| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Terios Corvalis
HUN Corp.
HUN Reloaded
   |
Posted - 2009.01.20 16:23:00 -
[91]
/signed
|
Temitten
|
Posted - 2009.01.21 00:46:00 -
[92]
Good point
|
SexDogg
|
Posted - 2009.01.21 17:10:00 -
[93]
Can one of the CSM please confirm that they will take this issue forward to CCP?
|
Matrix Skye
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.01.21 17:26:00 -
[94]
 Originally by: SexDogg
Can one of the CSM please confirm that they will take this issue forward to CCP?
 Does LoveDogg = SexDogg? 'Didn't take long for the alts to start pushing in their votes. I hope CCP pays attention on who's putting in the votes  . |
Captain Thunk
Vale Tudo.
|
Posted - 2009.01.21 18:53:00 -
[95]
More likely to be your alt Matrix Skye  |
Lancer Maelstorm
Endemic Aggression
Exalted.
|
Posted - 2009.01.22 01:40:00 -
[96]
Edited by: Lancer Maelstorm on 22/01/2009 01:44:36
Originally by: thesonarnet
against it.
A couple of activated Sensor Boosters + a properly set Overview + a scram pre activated and blinking = instant lock
I wish it were true m8.
I fit my Phobos with 3x Sensor booster II's scan res scripts. That gives me 919.1mm Scan res. If I am in fleet (About half the time) It boosts it up to 1011mm Scan res. That being said, there has still been quite a few cruisers that warped off either while I'm locking it, or while I wait the 1-3 second module delay (With only my point primed ready to go)
So how bout you go undock and try out stuff before you post alright?
Edit: Support =)
|
Suitonia
interimo
End of The Line.
|
Posted - 2009.01.22 03:20:00 -
[97]
/signed
|
Artemis Dragmire
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 11:15:00 -
[98]
Supported. |
Kaya Divine
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 11:34:00 -
[99]
Not supported. HIC are here with reason, learn to use them. |
Great Artista
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 13:09:00 -
[100]
Originally by: Kaya Divine
Not supported. HIC are here with reason, learn to use them.
Bringing more people shouldn't be the answer for everything.
Supporting op. |
|
|
van Uber
SAE Academy
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 14:46:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Kaya Divine
Not supported. HIC are here with reason, learn to use them.
You do know they have to lock their opponent, just like any other ship, outside of 0.0 space? |
sicieler
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 16:17:00 -
[102]
Would very much like to be able to lock stuff before it runs away |
Solasta Kovacs
Total Mayhem.
Eternal Rapture
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 16:19:00 -
[103]
/signed
A cruiser should be able to catch a cruiser etc. |
Zaran Darkstar
Divine Slaves
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 17:52:00 -
[104]
|
Pliskkenn
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 18:11:00 -
[105]
Originally by: Great Artista
Originally by: Kaya Divine
Not supported. HIC are here with reason, learn to use them.
Bringing more people shouldn't be the answer for everything.
Supporting op.
I agree with this. |
Shirley Serious
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 18:53:00 -
[106]
I Support this topic as one that needs CCP input.
There are things that need considering.
Scout frigates (Executioner, Atron, etc. ), tech1 fitted to align and accelerate quickly, piloted by someone with moderate navigation skills, need to be able to escape almost all of the time, to fulfil their scouting role. Otherwise, it promotes alt accounts rather than co-operation with other players, especially newer players.
|
Ryas Nia
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 19:09:00 -
[107]
This has killed off all but remote sensor boosting gate camps for low sec piracy :( gone are the days of roaming HAC/Recon gangs, now unless you have an RSB Hic in gang your not going to catch anything :( |
Kaileen Starsong
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 19:44:00 -
[108]
Yeah, too much reliance on numbers is not really good 
|
Fraction Turrent
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 19:47:00 -
[109]
/signed
|
Ridley Tree
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.24 23:48:00 -
[110]
Has my full support |
|
|
Demetri Slavic
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.25 12:11:00 -
[111]
Something needs to be done
|
Gabriel Darkefyre
Shadows Of The Federation
|
Posted - 2009.01.25 15:31:00 -
[112]
Supported. It's crazy that a ship set up specifically to lock fast and tackle struggles to achieve a lock against a Ship of a Larger Class than itself before the target can get into warp.
This isn't the point that a Cruiser should be able to lock a Cruiser before it can warp off.
This is the fact that a properly set up Frigate can't lock the same Cruiser before it can warp off. |
Johnny Malloy
Caldari
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.25 23:31:00 -
[113]
supported |
Ekil Ix
Omega Wing
R.E.P.O.
|
Posted - 2009.01.26 10:32:00 -
[114]
Signed
|
Banni Vinda
|
Posted - 2009.01.26 21:52:00 -
[115]
This should be dealt with |
TEK9
Caldari
Vale Tudo.
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.02.01 14:54:00 -
[116]
Any CSM going to take this forward?
|
1072
|
Posted - 2009.02.04 14:28:00 -
[117]
%100 percent support here.
|
Foolish Bob
The Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
|
Posted - 2009.02.04 15:13:00 -
[118]
Supported. Cruisers getting away from interceptors w/ >2000 scan res (I've been both the cruiser and the inty) in lowsec is broken mechanic |
Takeshi Yamato
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 21:19:00 -
[119]
Ships that decloak after jumping into system can not be locked for a few moments. The targeting attempt will fail even when the ship is clearly on the overview and there is no sign of elevated lag.
I found that with a Interceptor specifically built to catch things at gates (sensor booster + 2 signal amps) it is still impossible to catch a good number of ships for this reason. Impossible is not an overstatement, most frigs are in warp before I'm even allowed to start targeting them. Some cruisers/hacs are also fast enough for this.
|
Thann Starlinbow
Slacker Industries
The Boat Violencing Initiative
|
Posted - 2009.02.05 21:33:00 -
[120]
Supporting da OP. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |