| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Keiko Shizuka
   |
Posted - 2009.02.02 06:09:00 -
[91]
 Originally by: Raknor Guldar
I will respond to this. I didn't have roles, that is why the transfer went so quick. I don't scam when I can get burned for it officially. There is a difference between a banable offence and a game mechanic. Thank you for free bumps.
Has this mechanic also changed? Because evn7289 is online now, and he was transferred less than an hour ago if my clock is correct. |
Clair Bear
Perkone
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 06:11:00 -
[92]
Originally by: Raknor Guldar
I will respond to this. I didn't have roles, that is why the transfer went so quick. I don't scam when I can get burned for it officially. There is a difference between a banable offence and a game mechanic. Thank you for free bumps.
Then can you explain why you sold Hap through unofficial channels but suddenly had a change of heart? You're very welcome for the spotlight, least we could do. |
Raknor Guldar
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 06:11:00 -
[93]
Originally by: Keiko ****uka
Originally by: Raknor Guldar
I will respond to this. I didn't have roles, that is why the transfer went so quick. I don't scam when I can get burned for it officially. There is a difference between a banable offence and a game mechanic. Thank you for free bumps.
Has this mechanic also changed? Because evn7289 is online now, and he was transferred less than an hour ago if my clock is correct.
That has changed... Every character I have bought has been active. I can't say why, that is up to a CCP person. |
Raknor Guldar
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 06:12:00 -
[94]
Originally by: Clair Bear
Originally by: Raknor Guldar
I will respond to this. I didn't have roles, that is why the transfer went so quick. I don't scam when I can get burned for it officially. There is a difference between a banable offence and a game mechanic. Thank you for free bumps.
Then can you explain why you sold Hap through unofficial channels but suddenly had a change of heart? You're very welcome for the spotlight, least we could do.
Never happened. |
Kazzac Elentria
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 06:12:00 -
[95]
I'll have to make sure to let Aurora Section know that they are harboring a known scammer as well. |
Raknor Guldar
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 06:13:00 -
[96]
Originally by: Kazzac Elentria
I'll have to make sure to let Aurora Section know that they are harboring a known scammer as well.
He is a RL friend and I would appreciate him being left out of this. |
Kazzac Elentria
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 06:16:00 -
[97]
Originally by: Raknor Guldar
Originally by: Kazzac Elentria
I'll have to make sure to let Aurora Section know that they are harboring a known scammer as well.
He is a RL friend and I would appreciate him being left out of this.
No.. I don't think so
This is what happens when you scam and leave your tracks wide open.
Confirming that EVN also has under his control the alts soccorfreak67890 and prodalt12345
This same account likely had a third toon which was either biomassed or sold as well and has yet to have the slot filled (well at least until today, Im sure he changed the key now)
Anyway, Soccorfreak has approx 58m of our scammed isk and is in the noob anti pirate corp (aint that laugh) Aurora Section.
Anyway, have fun with the info MD. I'm off to sleep for now and will prolly dream of the ensuing fun this is going to incur for the next 24 hours. |
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 06:45:00 -
[98]
Originally by: Forceflow
Edited by: Forceflow on 02/02/2009 05:53:25
Originally by: Kazzac Elentria
No, especially when you hold roles within your current corporation.
This thread delivers 
I hadn't had this much fun in a while.
PROOF OF GUILT (or as much as we're gonna get)
HAVE FUN.
I thought it was hilarious how consistent(Or lack there of he was in his reasoning) he was trying to convince us. The fact he now admitted it just kinda made it.. meh 
|
Raknor Korrag
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 07:03:00 -
[99]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Forceflow
Edited by: Forceflow on 02/02/2009 05:53:25
Originally by: Kazzac Elentria
No, especially when you hold roles within your current corporation.
This thread delivers
I hadn't had this much fun in a while.
PROOF OF GUILT (or as much as we're gonna get)
HAVE FUN.
Got bored, decided to sell off and start new.
I thought it was hilarious how consistent(Or lack there of he was in his reasoning) he was trying to convince us. The fact he now admitted it just kinda made it.. meh
|
Lo Lightshard
The Crimson Kiss
Coalition Of Empires
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 07:08:00 -
[100]
I'm unsure as to why this thread is worth 500M to someone who scammed billions ... just to needle Cosmoray?
Anyway, there was an audit done for the original IPO in which Kazuo Ishiguro states:
Quote:
I can confirm that the OP has purchased a freighter and large quantities of the stated goods using the funds received so far, and is generally proceeding as planned. His activities are spread out over several other characters, whose names I have noted. All seems well for the time being, and I look forward to seeing how this offering turns out.
Perhaps someone might have some fun with those names and I haven't seem them published yet.
[IMA6E REMOVED] |
Ambo
EMMA Test Corp
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 07:09:00 -
[101]
rofl.
Cosmo, you rule. 
--------------------------------------
Trader? Investor? Just want to track your finances? Check out EMMA |
MilowFV
Echo Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 07:45:00 -
[102]
I am glad Cosmoray got his/her isk back and I find this thread very funny.
I dont even see this as Cosmoray scamming as she/he had 500 million stolen by Hap/7289/Xaiber so it more like repossessing her/his funds. |
Mr Horizontal
Gallente
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 07:54:00 -
[103]
gratz Cosmo.
evn: If you play with fire, expect to get burned. |
Kazuo Ishiguro
House of Marbles
Zzz
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:16:00 -
[104]
Confirming that Equinaxe was another evn alt all along and that the sale was staged. |
SentryRaven
KIA Corp
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:21:00 -
[105]
I for one believe, saying "I would never scam" and "I only scammed him back because his main scammed me" is double standards.
But seems this all was a nice joke and lunchtime read, so everyone get back to work. There is ISK to be made... |
Viper ShizzIe
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:25:00 -
[106]
Originally by: SentryRaven
I for one believe, saying "I would never scam" and "I only scammed him back because his main scammed me" is double standards.
|
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:33:00 -
[107]
Originally by: SentryRaven
I for one believe, saying "I would never scam" and "I only scammed him back because his main scammed me" is double standards.
But saying ""I only scammed him back because his main scammed me" is faulty. It's like the US saying:
"We are commit acts of terror only because they did so to us". You won't hear that.
It's all about perspective. Your perspective is faulty, hence a collision of logic.
So let me fix it for you.
Originally by: SentryRaven
I for one believe, saying "I would never scam" and "I took back the ISK he took from me" is just fine.
|
Viper ShizzIe
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:34:00 -
[108]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: SentryRaven
I for one believe, saying "I would never scam" and "I only scammed him back because his main scammed me" is double standards.
But saying ""I only scammed him back because his main scammed me" is faulty. It's like the US saying:
"We are commit acts of terror only because they did so to us". You won't hear that.
It's all about perspective. Your perspective is faulty, hence a collision of logic.
So let me fix it for you.
Originally by: SentryRaven
I for one believe, saying "I would never scam" and "I took back the ISK he took from me" is just fine.
If EBANK took my isk and didn't pay it back when asked to, would that be scamming? |
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:38:00 -
[109]
Originally by: Viper ****zIe
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: SentryRaven
I for one believe, saying "I would never scam" and "I only scammed him back because his main scammed me" is double standards.
But saying ""I only scammed him back because his main scammed me" is faulty. It's like the US saying:
"We are commit acts of terror only because they did so to us". You won't hear that.
It's all about perspective. Your perspective is faulty, hence a collision of logic.
So let me fix it for you.
Originally by: SentryRaven
I for one believe, saying "I would never scam" and "I took back the ISK he took from me" is just fine.
If EBANK took my isk and didn't pay it back when asked to, would that be scamming?
You didn't steal ISK from us. So yes, that would be. |
SentryRaven
KIA Corp
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:39:00 -
[110]
Originally by: Viper ****zIe
*snip*
If EBANK took my isk and didn't pay it back when asked to, would that be scamming?
From my, according to LaVista, faulty perspective, I'd say yes. |
YouGotRipped
Ewigkeit
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:45:00 -
[111]
Originally by: evn7289
Oink, oink, oink.
And you say you're Russian. Well what does that make you? |
Ricdics
Tleilex Developments
Dara Cothrom
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:50:00 -
[112]
great way to get me through a crappy day in the office |
Viper ShizzIe
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:50:00 -
[113]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
You didn't steal ISK from us. So yes, that would be.
I've indirectly caused EBANK to lose isk, which technically means that I've caused a loss for EBANK. Using your logic this would make me a viable target for your scam.
|
YouGotRipped
Ewigkeit
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:52:00 -
[114]
Originally by: Viper ****zIe
I've indirectly caused EBANK to lose isk, which technically means that I've caused a loss for EBANK. Using your logic this would make me a viable target for your scam.
Shut up.
Brought up in the Assembly hall, feel free to wander over and sign |
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:56:00 -
[115]
Originally by: Viper ****zIe
Originally by: LaVista Vista
You didn't steal ISK from us. So yes, that would be.
I've indirectly caused EBANK to lose isk, which technically means that I've caused a loss for EBANK. Using your logic this would make me a viable target for your scam.
No, because our business structure is based around that very fact. Sure, there's opportunity cost involved in everything. But meh, lets not be silly.
|
Ricdics
Tleilex Developments
Dara Cothrom
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 09:56:00 -
[116]
ebank <3 everyone
Ebanks corporate stance is well known. You know this, my ****zle. |
Viper ShizzIe
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 10:09:00 -
[117]
I should really troll MD more often, this is great relief from writing an essay due in 6 hours :3
<3 Ricdic |
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 10:14:00 -
[118]
Edited by: LaVista Vista on 02/02/2009 10:15:09
Originally by: SentryRaven
From my, according to LaVista, faulty perspective
Well, look. It's the old Terrorist vs Freedom-fighter argument.
Which side of the fence are you on? If you stand on the fence and people on either side has the same intention because you can't put yourself in their shoes, then there's no point.
It's like watching 2 guys in a bar who are about to get into a fight. They have a difference in opinion which comes to a fight.
But if you don't know why, your perspective is non-existing. In which case you need to get off your damn horse on your damn moral high-ground 
I can totally see why you would think that cosmo is a scammer too. But I'm choosing not to take the moral high-ground and go for justice. While christianity does teach to turn your other chin rather than hit back, it doesn't get you anywhere in EVE. It's that simple. Fight back or you won't become anything.
That's the end on my rant on morals. Now please have a nice day. I'm going to raid the cafeteria for lunch 
EDIT: I realize I might offend somebody here. Please don't take offense. I just have ideals. I still love ya all |
RaTTuS
BIG
Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 10:21:00 -
[119]
Edited by: RaTTuS on 02/02/2009 10:22:18
Just to stuff my ore in
you cannot transfer a character unless they are in a noob corp
i.e. they have to remove roles , with 24 hr, leave corp before a transfer happens
edit
oh yea and then you can log in straight away [and if you are training then both chracters coninue to train until you stop one of them [i.e. jump clone or finish skill] |
MilowFV
Echo Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 12:30:00 -
[120]
What the heck does terrorism have to do with this. More like if Ebank made someone a loan and the person had 3 billion in an account and default on the loan. Would you expect Ebank to give back the 3 billion ISK in the account or take it and apply it against the loan.
Cosmoray did the same thing really, 928(what ever his name is) stole 500 million ISK from Cosmoray and then was stupid enough to give the ISK back to Cosmoray. Now he is crying that Cosmoray applied the ISK that he gave her/him to the ISK owed Cosmoray.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |