| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Remove NPC Demand for Minerals - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So you've read the vast corpus of sociological research - or a statistically significant random sample of it - and come to this conclusion? After all, you did get tripped up on the difference between sex and gender, so I'm starting to think your ...
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.19 13:42:00
|
2. Remove NPC Demand for Minerals - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm starting to think we're testing the limits of the forum you and I. culture can be overcome by the individual ...and they can be constrained by it, as you and Jash are demonstrating, just incedentally. A potential does not necessarily e...
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.16 15:30:00
|
3. Alternative solutions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It is more a forcing of the choice - you can choose safety, but less profitability, or less safety and better profitability. ~Aissa Nomad, Dictionary and Encyclopedia of The Regulators
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.16 01:47:00
|
4. Alternative solutions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aissa on 15/11/2003 12:20:09 Strip mining in empire space, excessive profits from rat bounties, and a totally collapsed economy. Big problems in EVE, or at least according to some. One of the alternative solutions to these three pr...
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.15 12:17:00
|
5. Remove NPC Demand for Minerals - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aissa on 15/11/2003 04:55:32 By definition, if something is measurable then it is quantitative. Quantities are measurable. Qualities are not. Race. Ethnicity. Gender. Just off the top of my head, three fairly common qualitative...
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.15 02:30:00
|
6. Remove NPC Demand for Minerals - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ignoring my citations, do you take issue with any of my reasoning You never actually refuted any of the counter theories to supply-side economics either. You just said "here's one case that fits the pattern that supports my ontological postion...
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.14 10:19:00
|
7. Remove NPC Demand for Minerals - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
To Aissa, who cites Marx and Keynes, I point you in the direction of someone who actually watched an economy work before he wrote his books. Milton Friedman. Now, I might've taken you seriously had you not said this in the same post: "Like mi...
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.13 19:18:00
|
8. Remove NPC Demand for Minerals - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
"Aissa, you know the fun thing about a dictionary or encyclopedia? You can learn everything and nothing from them at the same time." That wasn't dragged out of a dictionary or encyclopedia. Of course, you know that. You don't like it so you res...
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.13 06:38:00
|
9. Remove NPC Demand for Minerals - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Heh. Restricted access to the means of production. Now where have I heard that before... ~Aissa Nomad, Dictionary and Encyclopedia of The Regulators
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.13 04:20:00
|
10. Okay, Pann... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The one of the disturbing things I see when dealing with these games (and I've dealt with many) is the ignorance of the fact that we pay them for the service. And? Just because you fork over cash for something doesn't instantly make you a ***...
- by Aissa - at 2003.11.04 14:48:00
|
11. Just out of interest... - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
It is simple: Equality of opportunity given a limited number of BPs that are being released into the economy via the agent system. Perhaps because of concerns over the player economy and the impact an excessive number of these BPs would have on...
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.29 15:03:00
|
12. Just out of interest... - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Everquest, loot, and the random number generator coupled with spawn times on certain MOBs creates/created a similar effect - if not moreso. This could be doubly amplified by inter-guild competition for spawns, etc. I'm pretty sure I could go to s...
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.28 04:17:00
|
13. Oh, no!!! The average # of jumps per mission is based on... Zrakor, am I right, please??? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Here is the worst location for an agent: N<-->S<-->S<-->S<-->S<-->S<-->S<-->A N=Neighbouring Constellation jump (or region) S=Constellation system A=Agent system IOW, to get to the next constellation or...
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.27 19:59:00
|
14. Oh, no!!! The average # of jumps per mission is based on... Zrakor, am I right, please??? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Another factor in the missions is "Next Closest Corporate Station" - for the "go here, pick up this, then go there and deliver it" missions (IE: Toolkits, Save the Premier, etc.). ~Aissa Nomad, Dictionary and Encyclopedia of The Regulators
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.26 19:31:00
|
15. CCP: **WARNING** Pushing Piracy completly outa Empire Space WILL result into a big problem, You must read. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh look. Another "The sky is falling" thread. How very novel. Let's all make some stupid suggestions and berate CCP for not implementing them! Then we can all vow to quit their "crappy" game and not come back. Maybe we'll even self-destruct our b...
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.24 13:48:00
|
16. Cancel Warp (CSM chat) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING! - Chicken little ~Aissa Nomad, Dictionary and Encyclopedia of The Regulators
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.23 13:23:00
|
17. Some notes on the new agent system which will be implemented in the next big patch - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Agents will rely almost totally on player standing towards them, their corporation and their faction + Agent missions will mostly use standing pre-requirements, instead of the old "mission success count". A good change, and this is what Papa Sm...
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.20 13:49:00
|
18. what will happen after new patch with agent BP's? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
On the Patch Review forum, Redundancy posted that existing standings won't be changed. IOW - No standing/faction/etc wipe. Of course, I won't believe it until it goes live, but that's just me. ~Aissa Nomad, Dictionary and Encyclopedia of The ...
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.17 17:13:00
|
19. Communism thrives in Eve - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It certainly does clarify where you are coming from (I do not intend this as a slight). "Capitalism" is not a system. It is nature. It's mean and ugly and unpleasant (when it is) because nature is mean and ugly and unpleasant. It is abusive and ...
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.16 13:04:00
|
20. Communism thrives in Eve - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
After looking at Dul's post, you really could just replace "communism" with "democracy" or "capitalism" without much of a fuss. Just a few minor changes really. That says it all I think. MacCarthy was no saint boys and girls - how many lives di...
- by Aissa - at 2003.10.14 22:52:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |