| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
101. Supporters of the nerf unite - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Quote: i also expect some megathron\phoon magic Don't dream, the web and MWD nerf simply kill the blasterboat. Whith a 60% web and large gun against a AB HAC you are now simply F UC KED. Or you are too slow and don't web enought to catc...
- by BABARR - at 2008.07.29 15:58:00
|
102. New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I never see a so much ugly nerf. If you want to nerf nano, WHY you don't make a EASY thing? 1 : limit overdrive and nano and i-stab by one per ship, like damage control. (so interceptor going to be fast, but full nano setup on cruiser going to ...
- by BABARR - at 2008.07.25 17:06:00
|
103. Dear CCP: Please Strengthen Manticores a logical proposal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
omg, if you want defeat a drake whith a T2 ship don't fly a cloaked long range T2 frig size ship ! The bomber are already very eficient against frig/destro and some cruiser. Stop to want a overpowered cloaked ship, if you want kill a drake you h...
- by BABARR - at 2008.07.08 22:36:00
|
104. Sensor strength rigs - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I think a 80/100% don't be "too much" when i see the lot of jam boat in pvp gang. And at least, people who fit this kind of rig don't going to fit polycarbon rig :D ... "Si vis pacem, parabellum"
- by BABARR - at 2008.06.10 23:47:00
|
105. Sensor strength rigs - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Can be a very good idea. Fight where you are jammed 100% of the time are simply boring like hell. And now you have falcon cloaked everywhere (gratz CCP to have boosted it).
- by BABARR - at 2008.06.10 22:37:00
|
106. If only MWD and Cap Boosters..... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: BABARR on 10/06/2008 22:25:24 Quote: Its the reason why no one uses active shield tank in pvp. Wrong. In pvp people use mainly passive setup in armor too cause it's more efficient and don't cost capa. And there isen't a l...
- by BABARR - at 2008.06.10 22:24:00
|
107. Another Nano Nerf? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Quote: Nerfing nanos would mean the death of small gang pvp. Thats all I have to say on the matter. If you are not able to PVP whitout nano, go play another game.... small nano gang in pvp are only able to kill little ship and run away, ...
- by BABARR - at 2008.06.10 22:20:00
|
108. [WTB] BASIC moros char - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
LOOL Better to fly a carrier if it's for drone, remote and dual capital armor rep. And if you have the money to buy a moros, you have the money to put rig on it. ... "Si vis pacem, parabellum"
- by BABARR - at 2008.05.19 17:22:00
|
109. Can we have a decent CPU cost for large shield transfert array??? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
How making a comment very, very helpfull and smart and... I just launch the topic, let's see if some people going to have some good idea, or at least if i'am the only one to think the CPU of shield transfer is a problem. My suggestion actuall...
- by BABARR - at 2008.05.05 18:03:00
|
110. Question: Another Nano Nerf? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yes nano need to be nerfed, it's not a new, but all nano user going to come here and complain "no no don't nerf" I'am a nano user, and yes they are abused. It's totally no fun when you gank noob and he can't hit you,ect. A sacrilege or a vagabond ...
- by BABARR - at 2008.05.05 17:51:00
|
111. Raven killer wanted - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
No, nos+neutra domi don't eat a decent torp raven. BUT dominix whith 2xcaldari ECM .... ... "Si vis pacem, parabellum"
- by BABARR - at 2008.05.05 17:28:00
|
112. Can we have a decent CPU cost for large shield transfert array??? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Actually the shield transfert array are very very hard to be fitted on BS. more than 100 of CPU, how can we fit it on a Maelstorm for exemple?? The remote armor rep are more easy to fit cause they use near the same CPU than a gun, and less powergr...
- by BABARR - at 2008.05.05 17:26:00
|
113. What about the agro timer? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: BABARR on 30/04/2008 21:00:25 Quote: Your corp misspelled parabellum. Oh very? very constructive comment. Yes, i know, it's a long story. Not the question here. ... "Si vis pacem, parabellum"
- by BABARR - at 2008.04.30 20:59:00
|
114. logoffski - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Did something change? I just had an isk farmer log off during a fight but never moved. I had a warp scam going and he never moved. Is this normal or not? Took my drones about a minute and ten seconds to kill him off. He did have agro ...
- by BABARR - at 2008.04.30 20:44:00
|
115. What about the agro timer? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: BABARR on 30/04/2008 20:39:43 Since years, CCP increased the HP and the tank ability of the ship, but the agro timer are still the same. Now, you see a lot of full tanked ship who agro only at dock range, or sometime at jump range,...
- by BABARR - at 2008.04.30 20:29:00
|
116. Repair bonus useless in 90% of situations ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Bah, it's simply the usual question, why plated ship are more efficient in pvp than armor rep one. ... "Si vis pacem, parabellum"
- by BABARR - at 2008.04.30 20:16:00
|
117. Some love for the Amarr, new Dev Blog by Zulupark - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Finally, you are going to make this "nerf".... It's simply a big error. All guy who where in a 3xhardener+EANM tank going to move for a full EANM tank, cause you simply get more all around resist, and finally going to have more EM resist than befo...
- by BABARR - at 2008.03.10 21:47:00
|
118. Counters to Caldari recons? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I confirm, damp are very good, a cloaked arazu next your gang can be very good :) ... "Si vis pacem, parabellum"
- by BABARR - at 2008.03.07 17:40:00
|
119. Torps are teh suck? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: BABARR on 05/03/2008 03:52:53 Quote: their damage doesn't seem to have increased considerably LOL? against a BS (or bigger) torp simply kickass now. The main problem now is tu use remote gang, cause large shield transfert...
- by BABARR - at 2008.03.05 03:51:00
|
120. Let stealth bombers fire while cloaked! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
And you want a doomsday on your bomber too? no? really? ... "Si vis pacem, parabellum"
- by BABARR - at 2008.03.05 00:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |