| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Pakokkie wrote: People that died to a character using isbox have their ships reimbursed. That does not at all sound like something that would be abused to hell and back if it was even remotely true (unless we're talking about some kind of ...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.21 16:56:00
|
2. Time to do something about locust swarms? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Faeana wrote: Some of these 20 skiff + orca + freighter groups are made up of fairly new characters, 3-4 months old, all created around the same date, all with very strange names. Shocking. Next you'll tell us they're all trained for mining!...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.19 18:26:00
|
3. Time to do something about locust swarms? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Faeana wrote: Schmata Bastanold wrote: Faeana wrote: It is risk free. Only risk free thing I can see here is NPC forum alt whining. Nobody ever said ganking has to be profitable, get yourself fleet of 10 artynados and gank skiff swarms...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.18 15:44:00
|
4. Time to do something about locust swarms? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Memrox wrote: Bump em'. Too much effort. It shouldn't require more than a disapproving glare in the general direction of a multiboxer to explode all his ships, disconnect his accounts and set his machine on fire.
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.18 08:53:00
|
5. Time to do something about locust swarms? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ashwind Houssa wrote: Sentamon wrote: Hate to break it to you but banning multi-boxing directly leads to less players and more bots. Multi boxing is botting, but since it gets CCP cash they overlook it. But I am not sure that your ar...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.18 04:38:00
|
6. Time to do something about locust swarms? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Faeana wrote: Barzai Mekhar wrote: Faeana wrote: Mr Epeen wrote: Gankers have been forever telling miners to stop whining and tank if they want to survive. Now they're all whining because the miners listened to them. You just gotta lo...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.17 10:14:00
|
7. Time to do something about locust swarms? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Faeana wrote: Mr Epeen wrote: Gankers have been forever telling miners to stop whining and tank if they want to survive. Now they're all whining because the miners listened to them. You just gotta love that irony. Mr Epeen Actually th...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.17 10:00:00
|
8. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lilly Naari wrote: Um... I am an IT guy, and you are 100% incorrect. AND CCP already does this if you use a trial account. Try it. It will only let you log onto that ONE account on the same machine. People share a sub-net "Mask", Your I...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.16 21:21:00
|
9. Time to do something about locust swarms? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paynus Maiassus wrote: Hanna Cyrus wrote: OMG. Wardec him, thats what the mechanik for. Grab yourself some miningships and do the same, if you think it's easy money. I only had problems with a multi boxer once for a while. The guy's to...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.16 18:09:00
|
10. Time to do something about locust swarms? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Faeana wrote: Barzai Mekhar wrote: Faeana wrote: As it is, there is far too many Procurers and Skiffs being used in hi-sec anomalies, most players are using them, this shows that there is a balance issue. So the obvious thing to do is, ...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.16 12:06:00
|
11. Time to do something about locust swarms? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Faeana wrote: As it is, there is far too many Procurers and Skiffs being used in hi-sec anomalies, most players are using them, this shows that there is a balance issue. So the obvious thing to do is, is solve the balance issue by adjusting t...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.16 11:46:00
|
12. Stupid undercutting - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kijimea wrote: I dont undercut for 0.01 isk as well. Saying that undercutting by a significant amount would keep you from adjusting your order every 5 mins is wrong. As i said in particular rigs, one guy dumped down the price by a large amount,...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.09 14:50:00
|
13. Stupid undercutting - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Undercutting by a significant amount discourages other people from playing the 1 ISK undercutting game, and I really don't like having to adjust my market orders every 5 minutes...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.09 09:16:00
|
14. Multi boxers and bots consistency - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I guess it's just the viking roots of iceland showing, but CCP does not seem to consider a friendly 50 to 1 kill unfair. Not to mention the distinction between "unfair" (situation that favors one party over the other when equality is expected...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.07 19:46:00
|
15. Multi boxers and bots consistency - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
O2 jayjay wrote: Barzai Mekhar wrote: Synergy was a specific example. <- sorry bro but it was an example of a Multi boxing program. They just used that one since it was the most popular Ugh. Normally, this is the point at which I'...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.07 18:05:00
|
16. Multi boxers and bots consistency - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
O2 jayjay wrote: From these replies are players that are Multi Boxing on a single computer. They are still playing the game and are not banned. They are posting saying "you dont have to use Multi computers". As stated before it is alittle confu...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.07 17:38:00
|
17. Multi boxers and bots consistency - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
O2 jayjay wrote: Barzai Mekhar wrote: O2 jayjay wrote: This is a little bit confusing. I Bold some keywords that were written by GM Lelouch. Now the question remains. Do you need to be on different computers when Multi boxing as stated b...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.07 17:29:00
|
18. Multi boxers and bots consistency - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
O2 jayjay wrote: This is a little bit confusing. I Bold some keywords that were written by GM Lelouch. Now the question remains. Do you need to be on different computers when Multi boxing as stated before. Also the rules need to be rewritten t...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.07 17:21:00
|
19. Multi boxers and bots consistency - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Notorious Fellon wrote: It's like having a conversation with a flashing neon sign. It just says the same thing over and over and over without listening to the hobo trying to tell it that it is flashing the wrong words. Relevant
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.07 16:45:00
|
20. Multi boxers and bots consistency - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
O2 jayjay wrote: You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes or other patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an acceler...
- by Barzai Mekhar - at 2014.08.07 16:33:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |