| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 |
381. Why are CCP redesigning Exhumers around high-sec suicide gangs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
stoicfaux wrote: CCP Goliath wrote: Nice quoting. Let me join in. ... Translation: We changed things. Get over it. And why aren't you posting in the pre-existing threadnaught ? edit: To be fair, I like the "not a high-sec ship" twist...
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.30 16:57:00
|
382. Why are CCP redesigning Exhumers around high-sec suicide gangs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
to make you post whiny **** posts, thats why.
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.30 16:47:00
|
383. Escapism from escapism - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I just met a girl, and her corporation wardecced us.
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.30 13:28:00
|
384. Capsuleer invasion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
you're all forgetting that earth didn't go through a 20k year dark age ... if the empires of the new eden cluster managed to stabilize the eve gate and attempt to invade the milky way... they would probably get ****** HARD.
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.30 13:23:00
|
385. CCP Punkturis is hot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
and OP is a creeper.
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.30 13:16:00
|
386. NC. are such good MATES with RvB they chucked us a war... - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
stupid children, in NCdot? it's more likely than you think.
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.30 02:52:00
|
387. Since mining barge ore olds are larger - orca/rorq - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Dave stark wrote: Denidil wrote: Dave stark wrote: no they don't. the hulk lost 150m3 of space. the skiff has the same space a fully extended hulk had and you won't be using an orca/rorq if you're using a mack [because if you did have an ...
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.29 23:37:00
|
388. Since mining barge ore olds are larger - orca/rorq - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Dave stark wrote: no they don't. the hulk lost 150m3 of space. the skiff has the same space a fully extended hulk had and you won't be using an orca/rorq if you're using a mack [because if you did have an orca or a rorq you'd be in a hulk] so i...
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.29 16:51:00
|
389. Since mining barge ore olds are larger - orca/rorq - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
orca/rorq need a major ore hold buff (do not nerf the barge holds!)
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.29 16:36:00
|
390. Improve the Hulk Please! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
learn the new mining ship roles you twunt.
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.28 17:38:00
|
391. Initial mining barge changes are on the test server - in Science and Industry [original thread]
get the shitposting e-peen contest out of the thread you wankers.
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.28 17:36:00
|
392. Hey Devs, when are the mining ship changes going to hit test server? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Dave stark wrote: Denidil wrote: sod off. genuine lol. we actually get the devs to look at the issue, then some whiny **** comes in and bitches because one ship isn't the end all be all and he *gasp* has to change rigs? ugh.. i want s...
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.27 20:22:00
|
393. Hey Devs, when are the mining ship changes going to hit test server? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Commander A9 wrote: Perhaps I'm naive or just stubborn, but...being the hardcore miner that I am, a Hulk miner by the way, I'm not terribly enthused about the reduction in my ore bay, and the fact that cargo expander rigs are now useless...and ...
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.27 20:10:00
|
394. Hey Devs, when are the mining ship changes going to hit test server? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
mackinaw: 2 crystals in strips, 4 ore types 3*3+1 in hold, 2 in strips = 4 ores + spare 10*25=250m3 .. it's bay is big enough with the size reduction in fact you have room for a fifth ore
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.27 19:12:00
|
395. Initial mining barge changes are on the test server - in Science and Industry [original thread]
yeah they reduced the mac hold.. so lame
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.27 18:54:00
|
396. Hey Devs, when are the mining ship changes going to hit test server? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Infinite Force wrote: Having two threads basically addressing the same issues kind of bites, but here goes:. not everyone reads this forum
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.27 18:25:00
|
397. Ice Harvesters Still Glitching - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
THEY CHANGED THE ROLE BONUSES OF ALL THE BARGES, READ THE DAMN DESCRIPTIONS ON TEST SERVER FFS.
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.27 17:55:00
|
398. Hey Devs, when are the mining ship changes going to hit test server? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jake Rivers wrote: And you do need spares, as the current format, it is impossible to check each crystal for wear when you are docked wrong.. show info
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.27 17:53:00
|
399. Give the mack it's 37500m3 ore bay back pls. give skiff utility high and cp... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Barbara Nichole wrote: Dave stark wrote: Barbara Nichole wrote: My mack on sisi at present holds 31250... or realistically 31 blocks.. that should be 7 cycles if the mack role bonus worked correctly... which it does not. role bonus wor...
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.27 17:52:00
|
400. Initial mining barge changes are on the test server - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dave stark wrote: Denidil wrote: actually resistances are based on mining barge, not exhumers.. so it is really really wrong. i bugreported if it's mining barge level 5*1.05 is 1.25... right? so it's gone from 7.5% per barge level, to 5% ...
- by Denidil - at 2012.07.27 16:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |