Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Ancillary Shield Booster - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
If I'm not mistaken, looking at it, the new ancillary shield booster gives an unfair advantage to shield setups. You can expect a bunch of setups like this one from death from above (improved versions, of course). The reactive armor hardener is ...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.23 21:22:00
|
162. Sticky:New dev blog: Alliance Tournament X Random Draw Results - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Funny. RvB (who played fairly last year) are allowed to only field one team while Outbreak and Hydra (who went as far EULA violations to win) can field two.
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.23 16:37:00
|
163. Spying on the test server - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Fish Brain wrote: Everyone that participates in the AT has to deal with spies You're taking that as a fact of life, whereas I think the effects of this kind of metagaming can be decreased, even with very little effort on CCP's part. Fish ...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.20 21:17:00
|
164. Spying on the test server - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
The alliance tournament is not EVE.
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.19 11:27:00
|
165. Spying on the test server - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
If you can't trust your own pilots then there's nothing anyone can do to help you.
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.18 15:04:00
|
166. Spying on the test server - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
This kind of metagaming leads to fewer unique/unusual/interesting setups, and to more good teams dropping out early because Hydra supplied their (weaker) opponents with the setup and the counter-setup. Watching previous matches doesn't do that. A...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.18 14:27:00
|
167. Spying on the test server - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
They didn't interfere with thrown matches and manipulation so far either, but they say they will now. I'm not expecting anything, but maybe...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.18 11:22:00
|
168. Spying on the test server - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
They're already doing it with a neutral alt. One option would be to ban from the test server any characters who interfere with other people's activities.
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.17 20:22:00
|
169. Spying on the test server - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
What is CCPs opinion on alliances actively interfering with the training of other alliances on the test server? We're having Hydra Reloaded actively locate and scan the wormholes we're trying to run practices in.
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.17 17:49:00
|
170. Shouldn't the semi-finalists of AT9 get automatically be qualified for AT10? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
james1122 wrote: From the sound of things they aren't trying to actively punish Hydra, they just don't want to further reward them for producing such an awful final. But they are rewarding them instead, by potentially eliminating some of the...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.12 21:28:00
|
171. Shouldn't the semi-finalists of AT9 get automatically be qualified for AT10? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Sreegs wrote: The rule wasn't that we picked the teams we liked from some group of teams and let them automatically in. The rule was that the top x teams got in. Given that last year's performance in the finals was garbage to say the least ...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.12 15:11:00
|
172. Shouldn't the semi-finalists of AT9 get automatically be qualified for AT10? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Sreegs wrote: Read the quoted post where I quote the person saying it's unfair which is what I was responding to, thus the quote. We disagree that it's stupid. Ah, yes, I missed that. Apologies. CCP Sreegs wrote: I apologize that t...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.12 13:50:00
|
173. Shouldn't the semi-finalists of AT9 get automatically be qualified for AT10? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Sreegs wrote: Matze reloaded wrote: The reason behind this is probably that CCP or Soundwave or whoever decided this wants to avoid public discussions that they'd have to exclude either Hydra or Outbreak from the tourney. Nevertheless th...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.12 12:48:00
|
174. 64 teams again? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Zastrow wrote: The CCP dudes running the tournament are basically just volunteers who give up their weekends for a month to do this. Having more than 64 teams would require more manpower and budget to handle proctoring more matches. So that...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.11 12:39:00
|
175. 64 teams again? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Loxy wrote: We believe we have a good balance this year for the sign ups, if a big team doesn't make it in then they can only really blame themselves. Ah, yes. So if Darkside doesn't make it in the draw we can only really blame ourselves...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.08 08:34:00
|
176. Sticky:New dev blog: Alliance Tournament X Rules - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Loxy wrote: Everyone goes into the hat & the much larger auction system which we will post the details of in the next few days. There's never a perfect solution for this but we believe we have the best chance of getting in all the major...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.03 15:38:00
|
177. Sticky:New dev blog: Alliance Tournament X Rules - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Overall, good rule updates. Should bring out some new formats without completely wreaking havoc on old theorycrafting ideas. One thing I don't like is the reduction to 10 minutes of fighting in the 12vs12 matches. Quite a few matches in previous...
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.05.03 03:25:00
|
178. Sticky:EVE Online: Escalation to Inferno Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Broadcasting a "Travel to" destination in a fleet doesn't appear to do anything.
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.04.24 15:48:00
|
179. Appetite 4 Destruction - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
As most everyone does, you assume too much and have too much faith in your assumptions. Good fights nevertheless.
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.04.14 21:39:00
|
180. Jumping from system to system - Load Lag - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Seems to have been fixed in the latest patch.
- by Faffywaffy - at 2012.03.13 23:33:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |