Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Suggestion to modify new titan DD - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Orb Lati You guys need to be more precise in your acronym's DCU = "Drone Control Unit" DC = "Damage Control" Seems like a few counter arguments are getting them mixed up. a dcu is and always has referred to a damage ...
- by Graalum - at 2009.12.06 21:52:00
|
2. Why is the Naglfar being nerfed CCP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
bump
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.15 08:11:00
|
3. Why is the Naglfar being nerfed CCP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
can we get a dev response?
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.13 20:19:00
|
4. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Le Skunk Edited by: Le Skunk on 13/11/2009 19:37:48 Take one rebalance. Add 300 whining MOM pilots. Result: 1) HP boosted, ewar immune, unkillable Dock/Undock MOMs..... 2) Reimbursement president set. SKUNK i do...
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.13 20:12:00
|
5. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Nozh Hey, We've made some further changes to super carriers after taking your feedback into consideration. It's quite understandable that the changes made were a disappointment to many of you, but I wanted to remind you...
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.13 18:14:00
|
6. Why is the Naglfar being nerfed CCP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mkiaki Originally by: Elaron Originally by: Pattern Clarc I'm pretty certain now, that the balance team really have no idea what their doing. I've been of that opinion since the non-answer about balance i...
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.13 17:59:00
|
7. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: gnome blood If you skip the anti-capital role? Are you serious? CCP decided it¦s the new role for the ship and you conveniently skip it? supercarriers are terrible at the anti-capital role as currently stands. Further...
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.13 17:53:00
|
8. Why is the Naglfar being nerfed CCP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
this is bizarre. what the **** is ccp doing?
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.13 17:25:00
|
9. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: The Internets Originally by: Tinator Originally by: The Internets Edited by: The Internets on 12/11/2009 22:08:31 Originally by: Sarah Norbulk Hi, Mr.Troll. Nice to see you. Let me ask you a ques...
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.12 22:22:00
|
10. [Petition] Restore Motherships (supercarriers) to previous stats MKII - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed, not a mothership pilot
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.12 22:16:00
|
11. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Graalum on 12/11/2009 22:06:00 Linkage this is the test server feedback forum. You are getting feedback from players, it is not spam. Originally by: The Internets Originally by: Jordan Musgrat Originally by...
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.12 22:02:00
|
12. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Graalum on 12/11/2009 21:54:51 Originally by: The Internets Originally by: Graalum has there even been a single pro-change post in this thread? A decent number. The vast majority of people posting here are pretty...
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.12 21:51:00
|
13. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
has there even been a single pro-change post in this thread?
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.12 21:27:00
|
14. [Petition] Restore Motherships (supercarriers) to previous stats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed, not a supercap pilot I didn't know motherships were good enough to get a nerf lolol
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.12 20:43:00
|
15. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
i was stockpiling mins to build a supercarrier, and was getting pretty close on the highends and midends. Now i am pretty close to having the minerals to build the future ones, but i'm really not interested. thanks anyways ccp, keep up the terrib...
- by Graalum - at 2009.11.12 20:13:00
|
16. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: isdisco3 Edited by: isdisco3 on 04/05/2009 20:13:03 its still going to be insta-primary in every fleet fight, and its still going to die horribly. if your fc is primarying naglfars in a cap fight you've already lost
- by Graalum - at 2009.05.05 00:40:00
|
17. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
seriously though there are lots of circumstances where you can make the argument that its better to fit cruise t2 than cits on a dread
- by Graalum - at 2009.05.03 07:47:00
|
18. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Graalum on 03/05/2009 07:42:56 add capital cruise: instaboost to naglfar and pheonix. missiles are the only capital weapon lacking a short range/long range variant, and this should be addressed, rather than trying and failing to hav...
- by Graalum - at 2009.05.03 07:41:00
|
19. T1 Freighter nerf? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
bob in this thread are hilarious, went from wanting to own 0.0 and maintaining a giant empire to wanting to nerf large empires and favoring small local enclaves in like a week. Sounds a little bitter to me.
- by Graalum - at 2007.11.02 17:26:00
|
20. T1 Freighter nerf? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: maarud God knows how people coped before carriers, titans and jump bridges... how did they do it?!? well back then 3 pos in one station system and there were only 3 outposts per region in the good ones. Now days even ***...
- by Graalum - at 2007.11.02 17:16:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |