| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. Cerberus HAML Solo piracy setup? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Harlequinn on 07/02/2007 19:46:01 I think what he is trying to say is that interceptors are moving in excess of 6k more often than ever. This means that even heavy T2 precision missiles just won't do enough damage to deter them fr...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.02.07 19:45:00
|
42. [CoRM] Announcement - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Heya MikeG, Long time no see! Tell Purtac and Zo I said hi! Honestly what happened with LRC and CoRM was mostly between 0mni, Eldar and Zo and really stemed from that discussion we tried to have to sort things out. The war dec you guys got at t...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.02.06 20:02:00
|
43. Hawk, PvP setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
The Hawk is a great anti-interceptor platform, but that's about all it does well IMO. Really all you need it Standard Missile Launcher II's in the high slots with blood claw precisions, a BCU II, and a sensor booster to destroy most interceptors ...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.02.05 15:00:00
|
44. Falcon setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Harlequinn on 02/02/2007 15:26:10 Originally by: DunNa Originally by: Waxau Oh and you do realise the falcon has 7 med slots right? Wanna give us a clue whats in the other? I figured the SB in the seventh was ki...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.02.02 15:28:00
|
45. Buff T2 Webs!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Boost T2 web bandwagon! /signed --Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none.--
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.23 18:55:00
|
46. Dissapointed in T2 webs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Boost T2 web bandwagon! /signed --Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none.--
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.23 18:53:00
|
47. Give Torpedoes their AOE power back. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Slash Harnet Originally by: "Def Antares" i thought it was also hot when missiles were non guided and hit objects in their flightpath. gave missile ships a real drawback when someone hid in asteroids. Why did th...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.23 18:08:00
|
48. Manticore [Rev] - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
If you plan on fighting up close use a 20km scram, a web, 2 x sensor boosters, 3 x Cruise launcher II with wrath furies. I can get a domination BCU and a nanofiber on mine. You need the lowest cpu web, 20km disrumtor, and sensor boosters as well. ...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.22 19:07:00
|
49. [REV] Rapier PvP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sin Stylejr Edited by: Sin Stylejr on 18/01/2007 13:32:19 Ok i have to ask. Why are we fitting sensor boosters on this ship? Takes like 2 seconds to lock after uncloaking this ship with good skills. In that couple of sec...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.18 14:27:00
|
50. Need a hawk setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Thor Ba'aleron Quote: Well It's a decent setup in theory, but the Hawk has cap enough to tank or to run a propulsion mod; not both. The MWD gimps the Shield booster and that's where the Hawk's bonuses lie. It's a pig c...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.13 17:54:00
|
51. Need a hawk setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Harlequinn on 12/01/2007 16:39:57 Edited by: Harlequinn on 12/01/2007 16:39:31 Originally by: Ryysa Originally by: Thor Ba'aleron Since the hawk dosen't get a bonus for rockets, I'd advise sticking to missiles......
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.12 16:39:00
|
52. Need a hawk setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
If you're going for gang setups try this. It will kill 'ceptors in about 3 volleys @ almost 50 km. 4 T2 Standards with bloodclaw precisions 1 T2 Small Shield Booster II 1 Named Med Shield extender 1 Passive EM hardener 1 Sensor Booster 1 Micro Au...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.11 19:36:00
|
53. DPS : Drake or Cerberus - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
If only the Cerb could use it's last high slot for a launcher. --Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none.--
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.11 15:29:00
|
54. Harpy? Blarpy? Hawk? Rawk? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Dix Neuf I'm about to step into assault frigs tomorrow, and want to use them as additional firepower support for small 5-7man frig/cruiser gangs in 0.0, possibly with a secondary role as a heavy tackler. IMO both of the...
- by Harlequinn - at 2007.01.10 21:30:00
|
55. Sha K Annoucement - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Im going to miss you guys! Good luck, Sha K. I hope we fly together again. --Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none.--
- by Harlequinn - at 2006.12.26 04:17:00
|
56. To BOB & ASCN - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Merry X-mas, Happy holidays, and OMG DON'T DO IT!! Err, I mean grats on getting married! --Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none.--
- by Harlequinn - at 2006.12.21 18:43:00
|
57. StabbaPhoon - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Harlequinn on 15/12/2006 21:24:41 Originally by: Arktaos Inertial stabs got stacking penalty... Doesn't the stacking penalty apply to any bonus that affects the same attribute , not just the stacking of the same item? ...
- by Harlequinn - at 2006.12.15 21:08:00
|
58. Hawk PvP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Karma Coma Edited by: Karma Coma on 14/12/2006 16:15:22 Quote: Highs 4 x Standard Missile Launcher II (w/bloodclaw precisions) Mids 1 x Small Shield Booster II 1 x Medium Fs9 Regolith Shield Extender 1 x Passive ...
- by Harlequinn - at 2006.12.15 17:22:00
|
59. Hawk Setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Harlequinn on 09/12/2006 17:34:30 I think the Hawk works best as an anti-frigate platform, mainly it's best as anti-inty support. I think it makes a terrible tackler so I don't even try to fit a web or scram. This setup will wreck i...
- by Harlequinn - at 2006.12.09 17:33:00
|
60. Eve-TV Streaming problems thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
the buffering is absurd on the high quality, I spent some cash hoping to be able to watch this tourney in some detail. So I'm out the cash and got a completely unwatchable video stream.. Thanks CCP! --Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows...
- by Harlequinn - at 2006.12.01 17:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |