| Pages: [1] |
1. Requesting player input: heavy load environments - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Max Mexx has nailed one that I see constantly with the carrier/mum corp hangar opening. There is still a problem over long time with gradual memory leakage or some sort of table lookup issue (eg hashtable buckets getting over full making it real...
- by Ikkajo - at 2009.01.10 03:57:00
|
2. Logistics are imbalanced - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I don't have any numbers, just real world flight experience in active PvP gangs both in Lowsec and 0.0. In my experience, Goumidog is correct. In small fleet work, you want the Scimitar. With good skills (not perfect) I have a cap-stable T2 tank t...
- by Ikkajo - at 2008.02.14 03:09:00
|
3. This PvE'ers Take on the Golem - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Out of interest, which ships do you see sitting at that greater than 50km range? I almost exclusively do minmatar missions, which means primarily angels with a fair amount of drones and very few of the others (occasional merc, EoM and Serp), so I'...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.10.25 21:37:00
|
4. Onboard Scanner Encounters - Rat bounties & drops & Salvage - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Come to lowsec. Pre-2.2 you would end up with maybe one or two in the constellation at any one time, and if you had a couple of bugged ones, you were screwed. Now, I can regularly count on at least 2 in every system in the constellation - the lowe...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.09.06 05:26:00
|
5. LP Store opinion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP wish to encourage the community to participate in the game in all sorts of novel ways - such as providing out of game services, like those listed in my Sig. -- Industrialist Carebear, CEO Illudium Space Products: Where's the KABOOM!? LP offers...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.08.28 19:42:00
|
6. T2 Mining Crystals - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I've already bug reported it and got a confirmation that it is fixed. Unfortunatel I can't tell you which version they are intending to release it in as attempting to log into the bug reporting section is causing an internal server error right now...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.07.25 15:20:00
|
7. next patch : please estimate time - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm guessing that it can't be far away. I noticed today that the Bug reporting form now has an entry for 2.0.1. That was not there last Thursday when I last submitted a bug. -- Industrialist Carebear, CEO Illudium Space Products: Where's the KABOO...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.06.30 17:25:00
|
8. Bug Reporting Site Improvement Suggestion Thread. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm mostly a Bugzilla person, but I've also used Mantis as well, just not as extensively. I believe that both allow you to mark things as private - both an entire bug and individual comments within a report. In addtion you can create classes of us...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.06.28 15:04:00
|
9. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'll add another voice to the "It's a heck of a lot better than pre-patch" side. I play on an old notebook most of the time, and a super-high-end desktop the rest and the UI is far more responsive now. Better frame rates and the networking doesn't...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.06.24 22:14:00
|
10. More Exploration sites - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Thanks for the clarification on that. Really the only request I have is to be able to scan down wrecks using the probe system. There's a grouping for it under the scanner UI, but it never returns anything. As such, I don't see that as a new feat...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.05.28 02:38:00
|
11. More Exploration sites - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
OK. Fair enough. Does this then mean removal of all belt rats when this comes in? If not, it introduces more ways of getting money into the game until belts are removed. There's a fairly active "scavenger" mini-profession going on where people ju...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.05.27 22:09:00
|
12. More Exploration sites - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
What will be happening with the Ice fields? Will they also go to exploration? If they do, they would have to become significantly smaller than they are now so that they could be mined out to let another one spawn. Given exploration, is there a cha...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.05.27 17:29:00
|
13. Level 5 agents - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Not sure where to post this question, but it is kind of related to the new missioning system. When this hits, we will now have corporation-wide loyalty point and a LP store. What happens to the existing loyalty points as of just before the patch?...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.05.26 16:21:00
|
14. Name of the bomb launcher - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rigsta And good deal of random chance, or perhaps good intuition about how long before the thing actually launches after you click it. k I'm 30km away travelling at 500m/s, should be 2 seconds after I click the launcher bu...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.05.18 17:24:00
|
15. Name of the bomb launcher - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Glarion Garnier Have you considered another kind of implementation where you drop them and they move at the velocity your ship is at the time of the drop.. towards the direction you were flying to Naturally that would requ...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.05.18 15:24:00
|
16. SALVAGE: Armor plates - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'll add my support to the suggestion that the Nanite compound gets removed from armour pump rigs and replaced with the armour plates. That's the most logical and the drop rates match about the shield emitter drop rate, so that would make the rig ...
- by Ikkajo - at 2007.05.14 15:32:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |