| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 |
981. ISK from missions - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Originally by: Assmodean Hi guys! im thinking of making missioning to get some iskies, and was wondering how much/hour one usually makes doing lvl4's in a Raven with moderate fitting. is it 1 or 10 million etc. thx in advance! It's ...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.14 12:47:00
|
982. Can u really...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
One might argue that beating EVE is e.g. when you can pay with GTCs using the ISK you earn ingame with 0 effort... isn't it funny how some people advocate both GTC<=>ISK trades and EVE being superior due to its cruelty and costly losses, ...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.14 12:09:00
|
983. 25s-6p, 525 pilots in system, whos doing what? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Karim alRashid Originally by: Lazuran So basically IAC has failed to secure yet another key system while there were still free moons. Oh well, no surprises there (same reason they didn't take 49- when it was still p...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.13 14:49:00
|
984. My Windows works just fine, why doesn't CCP's? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gilbert Drillerson Mainframe systems are normally used by banks and such which have many thousands of concurrent users and web based systems with literally millions of potential users.. It is all a moot point though... thee...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.13 14:03:00
|
985. THE UNITED VS. MIZ CENUIJ - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Man, that gave me a wonderful idea. If I had a mothership, I'm sure I would quickly get tired of killing shuttles and noobships in lowsec, so I would create an alt and start a thread here to call people to come in bigger ships to fight me. That w...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.13 13:50:00
|
986. Why does ExeFile.exe still use so much CPU time when TQ is down? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yes, but why can't they just add a call to sleep() or something ... PCs with modern CPUs use up to 30W more or so with the CPU time used by ExeFile.exe, so a simple calculation yields: 25000 users x 30W x 1 hour = 750KWh burned every DT that's ...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.13 12:00:00
|
987. Logging off to avoid combat, why hasn't this been fixed yet? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dukath What I find most ironic is that so many people are against fixing the problem in name of those with genuine disconnects, while the current system actually penalises those genuine disconnects against CTRL-Q-ers. ...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.13 11:55:00
|
988. This has to be a joke... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Seeah Yalv Ok heres the story, a few days ago this guy contacted me [...] Will you sell me the BPC for, say, 60m if I promise to be just as bad as that guy, but agree to skip all the negotiations and AFKing? isn'...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.13 11:48:00
|
989. Why does ExeFile.exe still use so much CPU time when TQ is down? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Can anyone explain this to me? It burns about 30% CPU time on my AMD 3500+ and it doesn't seem to do anything. isn't it funny how some people advocate both GTC<=>ISK trades and EVE being superior due to its cruelty and costly losses, when...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.13 11:36:00
|
990. Server issues, again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
server is starting up ... isn't it funny how some people advocate both GTC<=>ISK trades and EVE being superior due to its cruelty and costly losses, when they use the former to circumvent the latter?
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 18:06:00
|
991. Server issues, again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: kermitfrog looking into it with some (outside help) / probably microsoft seems to be peoples general belief. Let's hope they don't upgrade [the server] to DOS 5.0 isn't it funny how some people advocate both GTC<...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 17:59:00
|
992. Server issues, again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: El'essar Viocragh Wasn't answered yesterday, don't expect it to be answered today, but why does CCP staff always talk about "failover" when they mean "break"? Failover systems are built/designed to provide uninterrupted ser...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 17:58:00
|
993. Server issues, again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Arimus Darkhart Now I do not expect CCP to maintain that level of uptime, however - assuming about 30mins per outage, we've had about 220 mins of unplanned outages in the last three days. It has to be said that telco e...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 17:51:00
|
994. Server issues, again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Argro Second day in a row where I can't play. Someone remind me why I still pay money for this lack of service! Because you're addicted, fool. Seek professional help. isn't it funny how some people advocate both G...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 17:45:00
|
995. Server issues, again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Wrangler We experienced a lot of application locks, unfortunately it became too much for us to keep fixing and the database failed over. We will now restart the server and we will start digging through logs to check what...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 17:42:00
|
996. server down again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natural phenomena are preventing you from playing! ;-P isn't it funny how some people advocate both GTC<=>ISK trades and EVE being superior due to its cruelty and costly losses, when they use the former to circumvent the latter?
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 17:17:00
|
997. WTF TEH SERVER IS DESYNC LAG CRASH OHNOEZ!!1 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
stfu noob it's just the daily DOWNTIMES :) isn't it funny how some people advocate both GTC<=>ISK trades and EVE being superior due to its cruelty and costly losses, when they use the former to circumvent the latter?
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 17:13:00
|
998. Server Issues, 12 November - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Lazuran on 12/09/2007 17:11:40 Wow this subject can be re-used. ;-) So, what's going on again? Borked patch, eh? But it might really help to monitor TQ more closely, it can't be that there's absolutely nothing you can do to prevent...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 17:11:00
|
999. Mature discussion on the rising star of eve and the server - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Needo If I understood things correctly it is in a way "sharded" already in terms of cpu-load for the solar systems, and will be even more seamlessly so after the upgrade when you can have several nodes for the same system. S...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.12 11:30:00
|
1000. Do devs sleep in CCP HQ at night to fix the servers? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Lazuran on 11/09/2007 23:14:43 Originally by: DeadRow CCP and Their Top of the Line servers! Works so much better with Sun hardware ... (warning, some pictures contain nude admins - not for the weak-hearted) isn...
- by Lazuran - at 2007.09.11 23:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |