| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
801. Dual boxing lvl 4 missions - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: mama guru Turrets focus fire. Missiles and turrets combined spread out their dps, this reduces lost damage due to missiles not hitting their target. Not to mention it reduces their effectiveness. 1800 dps focused is more...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.30 11:05:00
|
802. Freighters SUCK - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: 1600 RT probably a stupid question: but can i put repackaged ship in the orca Maintenance Bay? No. Parrots, commence! Postcount: 916555
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.30 10:58:00
|
803. Dual boxing lvl 4 missions - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Anything missile will always be at a disadvantage once you have more than ship due to lost volleys and the fact that the strongpoints are pretty much lost. I'd wager the best you can do is dual nightmares followed by dual machariels. Followed by ...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.30 10:17:00
|
804. Kronos vs Paldin - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
i cant access your skillsheet right now but it's largely irrelevant. What really matters is how many and how well you run missions. If yo run missions perfectly and 20 hours a day the minimal loss you take from reselling the kronos is neglectable ...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.29 13:02:00
|
805. Rogue Drone Ratting Ship - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I'd probably aim for a marauder or possibly something in the line of domi/rattlesnake. Pretty much because cargo space is more important than any other value. If you're after a caldari battleship Raven is near enough your only option. Parrots, com...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.28 17:11:00
|
806. [Falcon]High slot! Small Smart+Med Neut or Med Smart+Small Neut - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
How about a cyno? Parrots, commence! Postcount: 119295
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.28 16:30:00
|
807. Why is there no Amarr Khanid Design Battleship or Cruiser - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: TimMc Do want torp abaddon with: Amarr Battleship Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to Torpedo damage and 5% bonus to all armor resistances per level Advanced Assault Ship Skill Bonus: 5% reduction of capacitor recharge time and 5% b...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.28 14:20:00
|
808. Mackinaw and Hulk Tanks - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
If your belt is busted, you're screwed either way. Rats are easily handled by midslots. So I'd either go with drone mining yield augmentors or low friction nozzle joints. One making you stay in the belt for shorter total the other making you stay ...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.28 09:38:00
|
809. DPS Raven? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton tank is miserable of course, but like I/he said someone else is tanking and if the torp cnr is quite doable whats wrong with the torp raven? Two big things, one being that the cruise CNR actually do...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.28 09:36:00
|
810. Battlecruisers kill the appeal of cruisers? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Hirana Yoshida Originally by: Ephemeron If BC's were forced to use Large rigs, it would make them much more fair relative to cruisers and battleships. Costs matter. That might actually work, would certainly make ...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 20:14:00
|
811. Drone boats: No utility? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Fair enough, let me be a bit more elaborate. Ewar drones are not used because damage drones add so much that the opportunity cost of ewar drones gets to high for them to be viable. You could compensate this by improving their stats, however it wo...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 20:12:00
|
812. Maelstrom solo pvp - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron "legendary" PvPers aside, Maelstrom is one of the worst possible choices for solo PvP. The main limiting factors are - slow locking, slow moving, slow accelerating. You need room for MWD, scramble/disruptor, heavy...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 18:49:00
|
813. Drone boats: No utility? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Snyderm Originally by: NoNah and more importantly changing it to a global bonus would fix _nothing_ of it on any of the current ships. I don't understand what this means. It doesn't matter if a myrm gets +50...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 18:43:00
|
814. Drone boats: No utility? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Drone ships really aren't that bad to begin with - for small scale stuff, and more importantly changing it to a global bonus would fix _nothing_ of it on any of the current ships. It's really just a waste of resources. Parrots, commence! Postcou...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 18:32:00
|
815. Why is there no Amarr Khanid Design Battleship or Cruiser - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I'm guessing because there's no role for one. Parrots, commence! Postcount: 347912
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 13:07:00
|
816. Battlecruisers kill the appeal of cruisers? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Nanferr Quote: I said this when someone wanted to get rid of T3s because they was better then T2 and T1... Well ges what... there ment to be. this is an insanely complicated concept which is impossible to explain t...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 10:50:00
|
817. DPS Raven? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: afkalt Meh, half arsed fit, I dont care, delivers the damage and thats all that was asked for, perfecting it is up the the pilot It's worse than that, the modules I bolded does _nothing_ rigors don't work on unguided mis...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 09:44:00
|
818. public pole : yay/nay to faction destroyers - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Relena Owens Edited by: Relena Owens on 27/12/2010 09:39:04 Originally by: NoNah Posting your ideas about faction BC's and Destroyers is completely irrelevant until you put them in the context of your intended ch...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 09:42:00
|
819. DPS Raven? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: afkalt [Raven, lolfit] 6x 'Arbalest' Siege Missile Launcher (Caldari Navy Juggernaut Torpedo) X-Large C5-L Emergency Shield Overload I Shield Recharger II Invulnerability Field II 'Copasetic' I Particle Field Accelerati...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 09:38:00
|
820. Battlecruisers kill the appeal of cruisers? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Liang Nuren Bang for the buck is normally a term that compares the alternatives. In that light, the Caracal's bang for the buck is extremely low. -Liang It's not. You're just buying rollerskates and expect them to ma...
- by NoNah - at 2010.12.27 09:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |