Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Recent Amarr boost and caldari boats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ruato on 20/03/2008 20:38:53 Originally by: Ulstan Where we have a problem is with shield tanking compared to armor tanking in PvP. This is a big problem but not a caldari specific one and any fixes should not be caldari cen...
- by Ruato - at 2008.03.20 20:38:00
|
2. Recent Amarr boost and caldari boats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: sdthujfg I see plenty drakes, ravens, cerbs, falcons, rooks, rokhs, scorps, caracals and crows in pvp. Wich server are you playing on? I see plenty of useless trolling. Might aswell stop it. --- Get rid of those *ble...
- by Ruato - at 2008.03.20 15:48:00
|
3. Recent Amarr boost and caldari boats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Eleana Tomelac Your shield EM and thermal resistances didn't change, so the situation between your raven and an amarr ship shooting it is exactly the same as before . Not quite. Weak EM and thermal shield resist so amar...
- by Ruato - at 2008.03.20 14:26:00
|
4. Recent Amarr boost and caldari boats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ruato on 20/03/2008 14:05:04 Originally by: Ruah Piskonit Shields have regeneration. . .thats the logic behind the difference. Live with it. or train Gallente/Amarr and be done with it. The fact that so many people continue...
- by Ruato - at 2008.03.20 14:02:00
|
5. Recent Amarr boost and caldari boats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Chinese Chick No. No what? Shield tanked ships shouldnt get more em resist. or Adding EM resist wouldnt break the game. Reading the post ftw ;) --- Get rid of those *bleep*ing secure containers. *bleep*!
- by Ruato - at 2008.03.20 13:22:00
|
6. Recent Amarr boost and caldari boats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ruato on 20/03/2008 13:03:07 Well, amarr got buffed. Nothing wrong with it, but i was wondering if changes were good when we think about caldari ships (read: shield tanked ships). Lets take raven for example: In amarr buff, raven ...
- by Ruato - at 2008.03.20 13:02:00
|
7. Raven Overpowered now? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Jurgen Cartis Also, in the 'range' discussions, Mega Pulse IIs gets 15km+8k falloff with MF and 45km with Scorch L, the Raven is not the only short range BS that can engage beyond knifing range. As for blasters, well, what d...
- by Ruato - at 2008.01.25 06:52:00
|
8. I don't like the full screen login screen - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If it aint broke, dont fix it. And current login window is not. --- Get rid of those *bleep*ing secure containers. *bleep*!
- by Ruato - at 2007.11.02 15:10:00
|
9. carrier, moms nerf incoming - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Elmicker Originally by: Ruato Thats overreacting.. This would not nerf carriers so that nobody would use them anymore Yes it would. Assignment is impractical due to lag and coordination problems, and abandons the...
- by Ruato - at 2007.10.21 14:03:00
|
10. carrier, moms nerf incoming - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Three0fNine And the solution is to nerv them, that noone uses them anymore?? when you right arm is itching you can cut off the arm of course. It wonŠt itch anymore... Thats overreacting.. This would not nerf carriers so...
- by Ruato - at 2007.10.21 13:48:00
|
11. carrier, moms nerf incoming - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Tempelier Edited by: Tempelier on 21/10/2007 12:13:50 Why not work on your "core system" first! to finally let you play in fleet fights and not staring at your monitor for about 15 mins.. Nerving everything is not helpin...
- by Ruato - at 2007.10.21 13:34:00
|
12. Armageddon day feedback to CCP - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It was complete failure for me. First I couldn't log in because there was 1000+ guys in queue. After i finally got in during next day, i noticed these uber character do not have battlecruisers V (so i could not test ship i wanted (command ships)...
- by Ruato - at 2007.10.17 15:08:00
|
13. Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong I suppose then you would love to show me this amasing Maelstrom that does 1437 dps with tech 2 equipment out to 30km and can perfectly choose its damage types? Can the Hyperion, Abaddon, Dominix, etc out-tank yo...
- by Ruato - at 2007.10.14 04:25:00
|
14. Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I simply cant understand what the heck they are thinking sometimes. Rev II: absolutely nobody has problems with EANM's, and they decide they need a nerf. Rev III: nobody (as far as i can tell) is having problems with torps, and here comes the ne...
- by Ruato - at 2007.10.13 06:57:00
|
15. MOVEME Chan on SISI needs some love : ) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ruato on 12/09/2007 18:52:42 Originally by: Jita Alt They don't NEED to, they choose to, the least you ****s could do is be gratefull for it instead of whining about it like a baby on it's period Go back to jita and stay...
- by Ruato - at 2007.09.12 18:52:00
|
16. MOVEME Chan on SISI needs some love : ) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ruato on 12/09/2007 17:18:42 Why dont you make that channel automatic? - When Player joins the channel, Super Seekrit Script(tm) is automatically run on the server - Player gets moved to solarsystem with FFA beacons. - Player gets ...
- by Ruato - at 2007.09.12 17:18:00
|
17. Time for a new mirror of TQ ? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: BH Desryn How would that test skill training of skills?. Penn & Teller would say "this is bull****!" Anyways.. Skill training simply does not need to be tested (game has been around for years, so everyone knows exactly...
- by Ruato - at 2007.08.30 16:10:00
|
18. Time for a new mirror of TQ ? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
i think they should allow /charcopy TQ -> SISI Then they wouldnt need to hassle with mirrors anymore. --- Get rid of those *bleep*ing secure containers. *bleep*!
- by Ruato - at 2007.08.29 19:13:00
|
19. Kali 2.0 and drone ui, still nothing ? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
sadly, i wouldnt hold my breath about getting improved drone UI. For example, my old thread about drone UI ( here ) has 263 replies and 13734 views, and zero dev replies :p Looks like they dont even think about it at all when developing new st...
- by Ruato - at 2007.08.23 19:32:00
|
20. Precision Missile needs a speed bump. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I would bump all missile speeds :p Explosion velocity and radius reduce missile damage enough already (and its way way too easy to outrun missiles). --- Get rid of those *bleep*ing secure containers. *bleep*!
- by Ruato - at 2007.08.23 19:23:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |