| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
21. [Issue] vetoing upcoming speed nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
vote here instead: bigger thread already: http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371
- by Taex - at 2008.07.27 00:33:00
|
22. [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
no more nerfs
- by Taex - at 2008.07.27 00:31:00
|
23. Golem torpedo vs cruise - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
The realities are: You're going to want to wait till things are within 40km anyway to tractor them for optimal ISK per hour. You'll never lose a torpedo to defenders. Defenders do about 80 damage. Cruise missiles have 50 hp. Torpedoes have 240. Wi...
- by Taex - at 2008.07.22 21:07:00
|
24. Paladin, Golem, or Nightmare? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Boz Well CNR is fine in the damage dept, but it's hell to fit t2 siege on it and still maintain anything but a cardboard tank. With a Golem, you can fit t2 gear, have a strong tank, t2 launchers, range rigs, yada yada. It's ...
- by Taex - at 2008.07.22 15:06:00
|
25. [Issue] The Pilgrim aka. Amarr's Broken Force Recon - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The pilgrim is a broken epic failboat. Fix it.
- by Taex - at 2008.07.16 21:43:00
|
26. [Issue] Force Recon role bonus - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
No one lights a cyno in an expensive ship. It's like ringing a dinner bell to pirates and enemies. And you're stuck there at a warpable object for five minutes. Might as well be 5 years. People mostly use ruptures.
- by Taex - at 2008.07.16 21:40:00
|
27. Why no killrights when someone salvages my wreck? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Taex on 11/07/2008 18:10:58 They haven't fixed this yet? WTF
- by Taex - at 2008.07.11 18:11:00
|
28. CSM - CCP Meeting 001 - 0001 Skill Queue Functionality - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Deldrac Thank heavens, now we just need to get priority for this over nonsense like walking around stations. No kidding. I could not possibly care less about ambulation.
- by Taex - at 2008.07.11 14:56:00
|
29. [issue] We want a dev response about a skill queue - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
No doubt, why don't they either take it off the drawing board, or implement it already?
- by Taex - at 2008.07.06 21:32:00
|
30. Caldari Marauder - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Boz Well Only in the setup that he wasn't happy with because it required faction BCU... lolz. Nevermind the dual reactor controls, those faction BCU's are terrible. Maybe the try again was because that wasn't the setup he se...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.30 21:58:00
|
31. EVE Online: Empyrean Age 1.0.1 patch deployment - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Treelox Originally by: SirSpectre Originally by: Treelox /prays for his overview settings After the installer runs if you hit Finish rather than launch you wont lose your settings. Found that out the hard...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.30 14:20:00
|
32. Caldari Marauder - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ok first, defender missiles are percentage based. Due to rounding, a golem might do slightly less DPS at first, but it would quickly even out. Secondly, enter the torpedo. Defender missiles do approximately 80 damage. Cruise missiles have 50 stru...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.30 14:19:00
|
33. Up to 10M ISK for a Golem setup that meets my requirements - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Taex on 20/06/2008 13:54:00 And with that, I'm putting this alt, back in his box. o/
- by Taex - at 2008.06.20 13:54:00
|
34. Up to 10M ISK for a Golem setup that meets my requirements - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Kailiani That was a lot of drama to get a easy to EFT yourself setup, and lol at the caldari xl crap booster, whats the point of it? What drama? I posted a contest, and since it was on a public internet forum it got trolle...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.20 13:52:00
|
35. Up to 10M ISK for a Golem setup that meets my requirements - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Helen Edited by: Helen on 20/06/2008 07:02:35 Originally by: Taex Sure it's an awesome setup, and I will probably fly it just like that now and again, but that wasn't the only purpose. It was to push the envelo...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.20 13:45:00
|
36. Up to 10M ISK for a Golem setup that meets my requirements - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Endless Subversion Not much of an issue tbh. It was something to do at work. If you want to send me the ISK, that'd be great, if not, I'm also cool with that. Nah, I wouldn't be a **** like that. I paid you 11M for the la...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.20 02:15:00
|
37. What Cap ship? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Lithalnas well I will say some words you should take to heart: "if you have to ask your not ready for it." If you really want a ship to pvp with the archon is the best choice, mainly because of its battleship like DPS and ...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.19 18:16:00
|
38. Up to 10M ISK for a Golem setup that meets my requirements - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Check this out EV: [Golem, Endless Subversion2] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Power Diagnostic System II Reactor Control Unit II Caldari Navy X-Large Shield Booster Heavy Capacitor Booster II, Cap Booster 800 100MN Afte...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.19 17:02:00
|
39. Up to 10M ISK for a Golem setup that meets my requirements - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Slash Harnet Edited by: Slash Harnet on 19/06/2008 15:54:54 Edited by: Slash Harnet on 19/06/2008 15:50:01 No implants, only new level V skill is torps V. Meets every requirement except for range. [Golem, isk] React...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.19 16:50:00
|
40. Fixed one annoying bug, broke something else :-( - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tarminic I'm sure you've already filed a bug report on this, right ? Last I checked I wasn't getting paid to do CCP's most basic QA. Unit tests anyone? Did anyone bother to...I dunno.... undock and see that nothing got...
- by Taex - at 2008.06.19 15:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |