Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alex Foradlera
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:13:00 -
[451]
sry, but I am against. That`s a madnes to change half of the game to kill "uber"-nano.
|
Zigg Omelo
eXceed Inc. eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:18:00 -
[452]
Against it in its current unbalanced form, too many variables nerfed at once...
|
Mysdora
eXceed Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:20:00 -
[453]
I don't really see how the proposed changes would support my goal of enjoying pvp without getting entangled in laggy blob warfare.
|
Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:29:00 -
[454]
Voting.
As with all reactionary game mechanic changes, it goes way too far. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |
Sieessenschwanz
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:30:00 -
[455]
voting
|
Taex
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:31:00 -
[456]
no more nerfs
|
Pran Chole
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:31:00 -
[457]
Voting no to blobs.
|
Tepelath
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:32:00 -
[458]
They can't be serious.
|
Detech
Corrective Action Team Stain Empire
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:35:00 -
[459]
Voting
|
Shala Angelina
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:42:00 -
[460]
Do you REALLY need to nerf EVERYONE to take the edge off a few people who you CLAIM have an unfair advantage CCP? Apparently, you think you do. That is why I have to give this a big AGAINST.
If you need to address people that you see have an unfair advantage, fine. Address THEM. THIER ships. THEIR high-end modules and implants. Why does EVERYONE have to pay for your perceived abuses of a few?
Find a way to do this with some common sense, or leave it alone CCP.
|
|
atrophocy
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:43:00 -
[461]
definately against. very badly thought through as usual from ccp
|
XxNukeyxX
FroZen SoulS G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:48:00 -
[462]
Against
|
sue AGPlant
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:55:00 -
[463]
Yes the nano needs a nerf but wow talk about a sledge hammer way of doing it.
fix the stacking penelties to where they should be fix the overpowerd pollies then see where we are at before smashing the 1 style of play that actualy requires some skill from the player. Nano ***ging since 2006 |
Vanquish De'Enemi
Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 00:58:00 -
[464]
in present form this is a bad nerf
|
Ruze
No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:10:00 -
[465]
Support!
I supported both sides. I think making votes and vetos on a dev action, though, is pushing the rights of players. Personally? This is probably the best argument against having CSM's.
A lot of players believe they have some mysterious god-given right to control how an MMO grows and develops. They forget they are consumers, and thus their reign of control is limited to continuing to pay for the product, or not.
When players starting holding sit-ins, votes and vetoes, thinking they will be taken seriously ... especially before the changes even go to TEST ... that's when I think devs need to take action and shut the program down.
Genesis Project |
Ruze Ahkor'Murkon
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:11:00 -
[466]
Allo! Please apologize for poor english. It not my native speaking.
|
Tristan J'ior
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:12:00 -
[467]
What? Voting? Darn right! Fix those developers for changing OUR game!
|
Andreya
Direct Intent
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:26:00 -
[468]
Vote for boosting interdictors speed, to be faster than everything larger than it... other than that i dont care...
web nerf is sorta ghey |
Essque
Starlancers
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:31:00 -
[469]
Absolutely AGAINST.
The proposed changes will break way too many things whilst fixing almost none. CCP - bring the tech I polycarbon rigs in line with all other rigs (why were they released like that in the first place?!) and that's about all the 'balancing' you need to do. If you nerf snakes, nerf all pirate sets - that's called 'balance'. |
TheCraftyHippo
Vanguard Frontiers Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:32:00 -
[470]
While I fully agree that under certain conditions 'ludicrous speed' does exist and needs to be fixed, the proposed 'fix' is simply moronic and beyond stupid. |
|
Steel Tigeress
Gallente Steel-Wolfs
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:32:00 -
[471]
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832369&page=6#152
Quote: Yup, I'm all for it, as I've allready made some calculations. It's not as bad as people think...
Vaga still going 4+km/sec with cheap T2-stuff and without HG Snakes etc... Ceptors still doing easily over 5km/sec, and even my Rapier will have no troubles reaching 3km/sec with the proposed changes
Maybe folks in this thread should go do some of the math too befor calling the WAAABULANCE |
El Yatta
Mercenary Forces
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:33:00 -
[472]
Start again with the same list of ideas that are at the top of that blog CCP.
This time come up with a simple solution, with only one or two changes, that fulfills them. If it doesnt have the desired effect on TQ, change a little more the next patch.
DONT just go ARGGHHHEAHDIAJD<CSMPMCPS and change about twenty things, completely blind, and frack off everyone, and come out with no idea what change was good, what was bad, etc.
NO to the proposals, start again, nerf speed, but do it carefully. |
Ada Linn
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:37:00 -
[473]
Bad changes - no.
Fix the speed, but have a better look first at what's really broken. After the proposed changes you'll have to re-balances most of the HACs, and quite probably many other ships, modules and game mechanics. Try again, you can do better than that.
(One can hope, right?) |
DubanFP
Out of Order Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:44:00 -
[474]
AGAINST _______________
CCP Atropos > I pod people because there's money to be made in selling tears. |
Crudamus
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:44:00 -
[475]
AGAINST
Why don't you fix the real prooblems in eve, insted of braking it more.
Also, fix the lag, AND YES it is server side.
|
Smokie McLottapot
Caldari Keepers Of The Gate
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:49:00 -
[476]
Against the nano-nerf. Against the blob!
|
Yoshidzu
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:50:00 -
[477]
against fix lags and blobs
|
DarkSoban
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:51:00 -
[478]
AGAINST Yes,some overpower stuff need to nerf. but I dont see any balance in dev blog. it'll kill nano, blast boat, small ship,small gang and guerrilla warfare. ones again, CCP turn overpower stuff to trash. Is it NERF ? I dont think so, it is KILL.
|
PellePlutt
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:52:00 -
[479]
against don't kill nano
|
Ruze
Amarr No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 01:54:00 -
[480]
Edited by: Ruze on 27/07/2008 01:54:54 Completely against.
I don't need to see it on test for a month or even wait another 24 hours before I test it myself to know that it will completly screw up the entire game, cause server crashes, and ultimately force 150% of the playerbase to stop playing.
This is nothing but a reaction where CCP was bullied by forum posts, threats and CSM polls. I am absolutely CERTAIN my opinion is that of the majority of players, and as such, you apparently listened to a very vocal and whimpering minority when you came up with this new nerf.
You should probably always clear any decision you make about the game with me, personally. That'll help you guys in the CCP offices to stop looking like raving jackasses. I know for a fact I'd keep you from ruining how the game SHOULD be played.
AGAINST! And if this buggy thing will let me vote with my alts, it damn sure should let me vote with my main repeatedly! You suck, CCP!
Genesis Project |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |