| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kish Lorenn
   |
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:16:00 -
[361]
against
|
WCBirdman
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:17:00 -
[362]
removes snakes, apply stacking thast fine but ccp is altering too many parameters everytime. Devs get a hobby or something.
|
SevereMan
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:17:00 -
[363]
signed
|
Piper Halliwell
Phantom Squad
G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:17:00 -
[364]
Against
--------------------
You've got a gun, I've got a gun, Let's write a tragic ending.
|
Inertial
The Python Cartel
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:24:00 -
[365]
Edited by: Inertial on 26/07/2008 22:24:48
 Originally by: Steel Tigeress
Originally by: Cubana69
AGAINST.
Nanos are the only way this game actually gives the sensation of "flying" your ship.
More, imho this nerf will ruin what's been done by the "need for speed" philosophy and it withdrwas focus for the actual skill of the pilot.
So, vote against this nano-nerf and against CCP's "shooting-your-own-foot" Dev's that contradict the whole game's spirit and the previous work.
cheers
You do realize the first thing they did in the Need for Speed initiative was to nerf speed the first time.....right? Because everything moving soo fast puts a strain on the servers and makes lag much more pronounced...
What people are railing against isn't a nano nerf, its this nano nerf, CCP is taking it too far (reminds me of a surgeon trying to remove a tumor with a sledge hammer, would be better off with a scalpel wouldn't he?).
btw: 300 people have supported this thread at least (350+ with those who failed to check the support box) while in the other thread about 100 people have supported. Going with this, it seems like a lot more people don't want this fix, than the number of people who want it
EdIT: page 15 snipa! "BOOM HEADSHOT"
we are recruiting!
|
Jim06
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:25:00 -
[366]
Edited by: Jim06 on 26/07/2008 22:32:21
against
|
Doomdutch
D00M.
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:25:00 -
[367]
Edited by: Doomdutch on 26/07/2008 22:25:43
Against
|
hugo potente
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:26:00 -
[368]
against
|
sh0tz
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:26:00 -
[369]
Edited by: sh0tz on 26/07/2008 22:32:51
against
|
Enmel
Demonic Corp
G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:26:00 -
[370]
Against the nano nerf.
Seriously CCP wake up...
|
|
|
Felix Cimney
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:27:00 -
[371]
Edited by: Felix Cimney on 26/07/2008 22:27:53
against
|
stranac
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:28:00 -
[372]
against for sure
|
Demongorge
eXceed Inc.
eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:30:00 -
[373]
against
|
THE WAG
eXceed Inc.
eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:31:00 -
[374]
against
|
Blafbeest
Gallente
North Eastern Swat
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:31:00 -
[375]
i am in PL so obviousley agains it :-)
|
Farscape Hw
Black Omega Security
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:32:00 -
[376]
AGAINST the nano nerf.
in a game where capitals can just sit there in docking range tanking a fleet and kill rediculous numbers of ppl then just deagress and click dock, we need the ability to get them out of docking range or solo station camping in capitals becomes overpowered.
the balance in this game atm the moment is nearly perfect. spend tons of isk on a well fit expensive battleship, mods, and implants, and you can kill that carrier or dread that costs less than your bumping ship.
i admit that i havnt been playing eve for the last few months but i intend on coming back to the game, and i have kept both of my accounts active durring the time ive been gone.
everyone knows i love extremly fast ships and i swear to God: CCP if you make my machariel slow, i will NOT start playing your game again in 3 months when my dsl arrives. furthermore i will cancel my accounts that i have kept paid for and active since you would be taking away the one thing that makes this game fun for me.
|
RipJok3r
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:33:00 -
[377]
against
|
Taip
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:36:00 -
[378]
Edited by: Taip on 26/07/2008 22:36:14
Against.
Simply because it doesn't seem very well thought out to me, a solution to silly km/sec is neeeded but surely they can do it without completely chaning pvp dynamics all over again.
|
olhaonegao
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:36:00 -
[379]
signed!
|
Tani Hasegawa
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:36:00 -
[380]
Edited by: Tani Hasegawa on 26/07/2008 22:36:16
Against!
Nano Nerf FTL!
Eve will be boredom =/
|
|
|
Spinnukur
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:36:00 -
[381]
Against the nerf, whoever thought of this at CCP should be fired...All that will be left if no nano is BLOB warfare an we have clearly seen how CCP's server respond to BLOBS
|
Selim
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:39:00 -
[382]
Supportin' dis.
If they really need to do something, just nerf snakes and polys... they've got to be insane to throw these terrible ideas out there.
|
XVSSBR
D00M.
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:40:00 -
[383]
AGAINST!
|
Jade Constantine
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:40:00 -
[384]
Yep basically there are several VERY important areas of the pvp game that need fixing before speed. And I'm definitely against this "nano-nerf" coming before such issues as anti-blob measures in 0.0, sovereignty warfare, even de-aggression timers, remote-rep flagging, alliances in faction warfare and even things like loot ownership in pvp. We had a chance at the CSM to prioritize these issues and speed-nerfing didn't even make the first cut.
Star Fraction | Dare to Dream!
|
Kimiyo Ishikawa
Brannigan's Law
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:40:00 -
[385]
Against.
|
OCD Gira
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:40:00 -
[386]
AGAINST!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Steel Tigeress
Gallente
Steel-Wolfs
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:40:00 -
[387]
Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 26/07/2008 22:42:40
Originally by: Inertial
Edited by: Inertial on 26/07/2008 22:24:48
Originally by: Steel Tigeress
Originally by: Cubana69
AGAINST.
Nanos are the only way this game actually gives the sensation of "flying" your ship.
More, imho this nerf will ruin what's been done by the "need for speed" philosophy and it withdrwas focus for the actual skill of the pilot.
So, vote against this nano-nerf and against CCP's "shooting-your-own-foot" Dev's that contradict the whole game's spirit and the previous work.
cheers
You do realize the first thing they did in the Need for Speed initiative was to nerf speed the first time.....right? Because everything moving soo fast puts a strain on the servers and makes lag much more pronounced...
What people are railing against isn't a nano nerf, its this nano nerf, CCP is taking it too far (reminds me of a surgeon trying to remove a tumor with a sledge hammer, would be better off with a scalpel wouldn't he?).
btw: 300 people have supported this thread at least (350+ with those who failed to check the support box) while in the other thread about 100 people have supported. Going with this, it seems like a lot more people don't want this fix, than the number of people who want it
EdIT: page 15 snipa! "BOOM HEADSHOT"
Except that most people dont post at all unless they are unhappy.
Somone said it in a different thread and its probably pretty close to true:
90% of people who are happy dont post.
90% of people that are unhappy post.
Its why when there was no nerf on the horizon, the forums were filled with people complaining about nano's, and only a few people responded to them in defence of nanoing all the time. Generally regurgitating the same tired "counters" to nano's which all entailed either flying a BS so you could fit a hvy neut, or flying a nano yourself... those were not counters, its pidgeonholing.
I'm for the changes because it rebalances the ships. Those that were meant to be fast still will be, Inties and frigs. Cruiser sized ships wont be as fast as they used to be, they will be catchable by the things meant to catch them, like small drones, the small ships, and some missles.
Warp Scramblers are getting a buff, a good thing cause who used them anyways.
The web nerf is actually a AB buff in disguise.... a tacler with a Scrambler and a web will slow down a ship with a MWD more than befor, by like 2%, but will only slow down an AB fitted ship by 50-60%.
Ships will still be able to be fast.... somone did the math in the dev thread on the blog, and the dev was mistaken. It wont take snakes to get a Vaga up to 4K, a t2 fit vaga will still pass that without implants.
|
Viper ShizzIe
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:48:00 -
[388]
+1
|
Viper Shizzle
Xan-Tek Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:48:00 -
[389]
+1
|
Romale
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:51:00 -
[390]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |