| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Po3tank
Amarr
Basgerin Pirate
   |
Posted - 2008.07.27 07:26:00 -
[571]
THIS THREAD NEED MORE ALTS \ /
oops postid with my main 
Your signature is too large. Please resize it to a maximum of 400 x 120 with the file size not exceeding 24000 bytes. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Mitnal |
Amanda Wilkins
Caldari
Dromedary Goat Albatross and Fish
Big Bang Quantum
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 07:35:00 -
[572]
AGAINST
Amanda
Amanda Wilkins
CEO of Dromedary, Goat, Albatross and Fish
Protector of the Bunnies of Stain
... because we DGAF! |
Spud NoSkill
Minmatar
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 07:37:00 -
[573]
Definately against .....
|
Amanda Wilkins
Dromedary Goat Albatross and Fish
Big Bang Quantum
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 07:37:00 -
[574]
AGAINST
... this time with checkbox.
Amanda
Amanda Wilkins
CEO of Dromedary, Goat, Albatross and Fish
Protector of the Bunnies of Stain
... because we DGAF! |
Princess Alienna
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 07:39:00 -
[575]
Against
|
Decimo
DEATH'S LEGION
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 07:39:00 -
[576]
Edited by: Decimo on 27/07/2008 07:39:22
Against. This will kill interceptors for me.
|
Sha Dar
eXceed Inc.
eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 07:40:00 -
[577]
FFS people !!!
If you are going to/wish to vote then at least take the 2 seconds it requires to make sure you tick the box "Check here if you want to give your support to the idea/discussion going on" in the bottom or the vote will NOT be counted
If you don't then the most you are doing is bumping this topic every now and then.
Mark 1 eyeball 4tw
-
|
ceyriot
Entropians on Vacation
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 07:59:00 -
[578]
der.
Faction Store - Killboard |
Forumz Poastr
Royal Amarr Institute
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 07:59:00 -
[579]
--
|
Achura Angel
Metafarmers
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:00:00 -
[580]
OhYah
--
Forum Piracy is Win.
More links for Savvy types. |
|
|
Cheesematarburger
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:01:00 -
[581]
Posting cause I'm just that cool.
|
The Tommnynator
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:01:00 -
[582]
|
CKAYT HAX
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:02:00 -
[583]
Against.
|
Crowat
Most Wanted INC
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:09:00 -
[584]
AGAINST
|
Valasaria
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:15:00 -
[585]
Edited by: Valasaria on 27/07/2008 08:15:42
So, CCP you want to nerf speed, huh? So you take an axe to webbers and the hardest hit falls on the race that is best equipped to deal with the nano-ships; aka the minmatar.
GREAT plan, as usual. Not.  
Like I actually have to say "Against." Jeeze.... Get some people on the balance team that actually PLAY the game in a mode other than testing PvP on SiSi.
|
Toramii
Le Moulin Rouge
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:17:00 -
[586]
I can see the need for ludicrous speed to be brought down a notch with slight nerf to some speed mods and implants.
But the proposed webifier nerf with the new MWD disruptor funcitonality hits Gallente blaster boats even more. Other weapon systems are close on their heels without the range penalties.
|
Dr Slaughter
Rabies Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:18:00 -
[587]
Against the nerf as it stands.
Too many things changed all at once = higher likelyhood of seriously breaking the game.
Give MWD's a maximum run time based on skill and a cool down time (also based on skill). That would limit how long people can keep a MWD active.
Think about scripts for webbers so they can actually web rather than just engine damp. i.e. add a kinetic damping script to webbers, and an engine damping script for normal operation. This would stop people gliding back out of web range due to their velocity/kinetic energy. It would encourage dual webs one with each script.
Make webbers chance based (not change ON or OFF) but chance % of effectiveness.
... ...
meh. whatever. |
Kasheem Cetanes
coracao ardente
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:22:00 -
[588]
no significant nerf
|
Black Chimpo
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:24:00 -
[589]
Against - this kills small gang pvp.
|
Ninsoku
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:27:00 -
[590]
Against!
Because I didn't spend months training Skirmish Warfare Specialist V only for it to be nerfed to hell on a whim. That's send the wrong message to people who dedicate to specialise.
Nerf MWD or polycarbs which cost literally no skill to fit, don't nerf things which require insane skill training like skirmish gang bonuses.
|
|
|
Tema Zelikin
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:31:00 -
[591]
AGAINST.
|
Delos Korelian
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 08:43:00 -
[592]
 Originally by: Po3tank
THIS THREAD NEED MORE ALTS \/
oops postid with my main
LOL, even if every second character is an ALT in this thread, it still beats the hell out of the whiners who instigated this whole speed nerf thing and their thread 3 to 1, as I said, even if 50% of posters here are alts, and 100% of posters in the "for the nerf" thread are mains, the number of "mains" here would still outstrip the other bunch there.
Feel little scared that CCP might wake up and actually reconsider the nerf?
|
Lara Kotran
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 09:02:00 -
[593]
AGAINSTx2
And not always against nano nerf, but against the web nerf too!!!
|
Wonkles
Sane Industries Inc.
Ursa Stellar Initiative
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 09:13:00 -
[594]
Edited by: Wonkles on 27/07/2008 09:13:17
this is sad
Linkage
|
Oniko Sengir
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 09:39:00 -
[595]
Against.
Latest Video
|
Envy Srignen
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 09:45:00 -
[596]
Definitely against.
Taking out nanos will take out the best (and arguably only) way to roam while surviving gatecamps, and fight outnumbered and against entrenched defenders.
|
MKeeper
Northern Exposure
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 10:01:00 -
[597]
Edited by: MKeeper on 27/07/2008 10:01:29
Against. It's almost as if the people involved in the 5-hour meeting couldn't decide on which steps to take and, so they could get to the pub in time, just decided to go for a random bunch of them.
edit: oops, supportin this |
Plave Okice
Universal Securities
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 10:06:00 -
[598]
Speed does need some adjustment, but not like this 
Would you like to know more? |
Jengo Phatt
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 10:11:00 -
[599]
Against it!
|
A Lucard
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 10:21:00 -
[600]
Edited by: A Lucard on 27/07/2008 10:21:31
against |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |