Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 [70] .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kel Solaar
Soulbound.
|
Posted - 2008.10.30 12:04:00 -
[2071]
Againt too in it's current form.
|
Doc Reed
Loot.
|
Posted - 2008.10.30 12:42:00 -
[2072]
Against
|
ian perrins
|
Posted - 2008.10.30 22:33:00 -
[2073]
as specialist in minmatar ships this will devastate my charcter,wasting years of skill training i`m most definatley against the nano nerf.. go fix the lag instead MINMATAR HAVE ALREADY BEEN NERFED TO HELL LEAVE US ALONE!!!!
|
night shiftstar
|
Posted - 2008.11.01 07:57:00 -
[2074]
How do i get close enough to my target then, to use my blasters and my slow as hell (drone carrier nerfed, by the way) drones?
I need a MWD, im already loosing tanking and cap to use it.
Ill end up being blown to bits, wile my caldari opponent sits relaxed spaming local selling crap, making entire eve universe an imensse Jita, as im still out of range, IN MY POD!
I need as well my implant slots and rigs for other things, like Armore, that collaterals speed... Nanos i only use in unfavorable zones, to avoid fights. If a cadari wants to catch me, he should be able to loose is tanking to fit webs, as im not fitting tank coz im using nanos. Also, he should use their drone bay once in a wile, not only 4 mining! Light scout drones r fast and thers also web drones. Most of caldari ships have drone bay. Use them!
Doing something with nanos should b something like using cpu and power greed; if u use it, less resources for guns, or even removing tham from game would b bether than cutting of everything abt speed. Even bether would b creating counter mesures, like appends in nature.
If a species develops a determent advantage, the other should countermeasure it. U guys create the rouls, now deal with it.
Sincerely, the fox become faster than the rabbit... Natures reply: "Ups, lets shop of its legs"
Meh, if nerfing goes, at least increase my drones engagement speed, speed bonuses of some races speed specialized and the ability to shoot down missiles!
|
Kazan Bho
Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.11.01 15:55:00 -
[2075]
The whole nano-nerf is a massive overreaction to a small problem (that CCP caused ) that could easily be solved with a few gentle tweaks.
Sadly, the people at CCP who have invested so much time in developing the game and working with its community seem to have moved onto CCP's new project, and the new team in control of game development do not appear to have any respect for the game, its history or its player base.
I truly hope that CCP can pull something out of the bag to save this great game.
|
Sar Ferredj
Universal Mining Inc Forged Dominion
|
Posted - 2008.11.05 08:59:00 -
[2076]
Nuking an entire area of the game to solve 1 problem is not a viable tactic . . . I support this thread : FIND A BETTER ANSWER TO THIS PROBLEM !
|
Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.11.05 11:31:00 -
[2077]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 05/11/2008 11:32:21 A mess of horrible changes nerfing everything in game, and breaking balance horribly in a number of places. I expected them to improve the changes after the first SISI iteration which was problematic - instead they just pushed the same stuff sans MWD reactivation delay, and went on wantonly nerfing stuff along the way.
Down with the crap.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Stalina
Gallente Deep Space Exploration Squad
|
Posted - 2008.11.05 13:43:00 -
[2078]
You know...after 2000 replys against this nerf...70 pages on this thread, CCP Still bringing this crap onto TQ, shows they dont care about their subscribers at all. They dont care about this CSM crap ( guess it's a joke ) and just continue nerfing things they dont even know how to use.
|
Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.11.06 00:59:00 -
[2079]
Originally by: Stalina You know...after 2000 replys against this nerf...70 pages on this thread, CCP Still bringing this crap onto TQ, shows they dont care about their subscribers at all. They dont care about this CSM crap ( guess it's a joke ) and just continue nerfing things they dont even know how to use.
Coming from the people suggesting small guns on battleships, well... erm. What's the point?
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Kaker
Demonic Corp G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.11.06 06:52:00 -
[2080]
AGAINST NANO NERF Gimme My 8 hvy drone Thorax back ! |
|
Takon Orlani
Chaos Monkeys
|
Posted - 2008.11.07 04:27:00 -
[2081]
I support this after seeing it put into effect on SiSi.
Using a pack of nails where a staple would have done the job.
|
Rakaim
19th Star Logistics
|
Posted - 2008.11.07 04:58:00 -
[2082]
I just wish nerfs would halt complelty. It's making my cry. I don't feel one way or the other about this particular nerf but I feel strongly for those who are losing a lot of training becuase of another silly nerf!!
I also am against the carrier nerf, and they're NOT overpowerd becuase spending 1.1B on a ship and repairers with crap loads of training time SHOULD be able to instantly redeploy! They've earned it!
But yeah, any nerfing is bad. I just feel bad for these players is all.
|
Bambuu
|
Posted - 2008.11.07 15:42:00 -
[2083]
Against.
Quote: Overkill is a slang term for the use of excessive force that seems to go much further than necessary to achieve its goal. For example, shooting an ant with a rocket launcher would be overkill. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overkill
Wake up. Needed a few small minor changes... not for you to wade in with a sledgehammer.
|
Rubino
Minmatar Mafia
|
Posted - 2008.11.07 15:48:00 -
[2084]
Completely against this nerf!
There's no reason at all to nerf nano ships. They're just as vulnerable as any other ship. Most aren't cap stable, most have paper-thin shields/armor when compared to similarly priced ships, most require a great deal of skill to fly properly. There are also plenty of ways to defend against a nano ship. The fact that people choose not to set-up their ship/fleet to defend against a nano ship, then whinge like 3 year olds when they lose ships doesn't justify wiping out a legitimate tactic.
CCP have taken some of the diversity out of the game and have pushed us closer towards blob warfare. Completely bonkers.
|
Keflin Geard
Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.11.07 19:42:00 -
[2085]
Been on sisi and dont like what i see - this expansion is not a nano-nerf - its a fundamental reorientation of the game away from fluid fast-paced engagements that rely on position to a slower paced one where numbers are king.
It hurts solo and small gang roaming. It rewards static gate camping. It nerfs almost every ship in the game except assault frigs. and murders the most fun ships in the game ū Hacs and recons. It creates ridiculous imbalances where expensive ships and highly skilled characters are now much less effective against small and cheap ships flown by low skill point characters.
The weapons stacking thing is good as are the server improvements ū thatĘs a big price to pay for all the rest of the crap.
|
Ameri Boi
hirr Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.11.07 20:08:00 -
[2086]
fully Support the petition against the nano nerf.
Either way, I got plans for new ship fittings if the nano nerf goes through, but would be nice if I didnt have to bother.
pew pew boom boom FLASH splat. |
Felysta Sandorn
coracao ardente Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 15:06:00 -
[2087]
Being the largest and most supported topic in the forum, it's suprising that this is still going ahead...
.: A Vagabond's Requiem (Blog) :.
|
Phoenus
Reikoku Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 20:49:00 -
[2088]
Originally by: Keflin Geard Been on sisi and dont like what i see - this expansion is not a nano-nerf - its a fundamental reorientation of the game away from fluid fast-paced engagements that rely on position to a slower paced one where numbers are king.
It hurts solo and small gang roaming. It rewards static gate camping. It nerfs almost every ship in the game except assault frigs. and murders the most fun ships in the game ū Hacs and recons. It creates ridiculous imbalances where expensive ships and highly skilled characters are now much less effective against small and cheap ships flown by low skill point characters.
The weapons stacking thing is good as are the server improvements ū thatĘs a big price to pay for all the rest of the crap.
^ This.
|
Sniper Wolf18
Apocalypse Ponies H E L I C O N
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 20:59:00 -
[2089]
McVOTE
|
ViRUS Pottage
R.U.S.T.
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 21:50:00 -
[2090]
I APPROVE!!!!! _________
Originally by: CCP Taera
May I have your stuff?
|
|
Jacques Benoit
Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 22:00:00 -
[2091]
Edited by: Jacques Benoit on 08/11/2008 22:04:42 I'm in agreement, down with the nerf!
|
Vitrael
Reaper Industries Eternal Rapture
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 22:38:00 -
[2092]
I support the anti "Speed Balance" movement.
These changes effect far too many fundamental aspects of gameplay to be viable, and I feel they will be damaging to the game overall.
-----
|
Lukeah
Relentless Industries
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 22:43:00 -
[2093]
/against!
This patch hasn't been tested enough! Most people who are blindly supporting it haven't even been on Sisi to see how messed up things are over there. |
Anomie Camus
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 22:45:00 -
[2094]
Edited by: Anomie Camus on 08/11/2008 22:44:50 Against!!!
|
Khamal Jolstien
Product Number 3
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 22:45:00 -
[2095]
Edited by: Khamal Jolstien on 08/11/2008 22:45:48
Originally by: Lukeah /against!
This patch hasn't been tested enough! Most people who are blindly supporting it haven't even been on Sisi to see how messed up things are over there.
I don't like nanos, but the way they've gone about this is absolutely insane. now all ships are nerfed, and it's almost miserable trying to play.
Edit to add following: Bottom line is, after testing it on SiSi, it's just not fun. THIS is where you should be focusing.
|
Q'zelm Wyrnatori
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 22:52:00 -
[2096]
This thead has my full support
|
MEM0
Battlestars
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 23:02:00 -
[2097]
Edited by: MEM0 on 08/11/2008 23:02:59 AGAINST
|
Needa3
BURN EDEN Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 23:15:00 -
[2098]
Give me my Raven back CCP
This account is paid for and i don't want your blob encouraging nerfs.
My time skilling My time playing My corps time creating tactics
You ****ing it up with a "way to go blob" patch
Undo all your nerfs and start boosting things instead of pulling the carebear card again and again
|
JorEl Tarasque
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 23:43:00 -
[2099]
Edited by: JorEl Tarasque on 08/11/2008 23:44:10 This is not an update to game play. This is a freakin "NERF FEAST".
So many people have spoken out against these changes and it all appears to be falling on deaf errors.
This is really beyond belief.
|
jdok
Reaper Industries Eternal Rapture
|
Posted - 2008.11.08 23:54:00 -
[2100]
Edited by: jdok on 08/11/2008 23:54:54 Really bad timing ccp, with all the other great games coming out on the same day as your fail cascade, looks like I'll be droppin eve for a while.
This is no expansion, this is slapping your players in the face ___________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 [70] .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |