Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sealime
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:51:00 -
[391]
|
seliana tanis
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:51:00 -
[392]
Against!
|
Steel Tigeress
Gallente Steel-Wolfs
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:52:00 -
[393]
Wow, alt voting ftl....
|
Jade Constantine
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:55:00 -
[394]
Originally by: Steel Tigeress Wow, alt voting ftl....
Don't worry too much. The CSM admins have a way to see how many actual accounts support rather than individual supports (which can obviously be 3 per account). When this gets to the wire we'll be able to call for an accurate indication of player sentiment either way (this and the pro-nerf camp).
Star Fraction | Dare to Dream!
|
Shad0w Hawk
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:57:00 -
[395]
against it.
|
MARC181983
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:57:00 -
[396]
Its just plain bull , ruins the entire game.
|
Steel Tigeress
Gallente Steel-Wolfs
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:00:00 -
[397]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Originally by: Steel Tigeress Wow, alt voting ftl....
Don't worry too much. The CSM admins have a way to see how many actual accounts support rather than individual supports (which can obviously be 3 per account). When this gets to the wire we'll be able to call for an accurate indication of player sentiment either way (this and the pro-nerf camp).
Thats good to know. I have 2 accounts but still only vote 1x because I'm just 1 person.
|
Beastoria
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:01:00 -
[398]
against --------------------------------------------------
Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 bytes, ty. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Cortes |
Fabric Live
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:02:00 -
[399]
against it
|
Saphire Emerald
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:03:00 -
[400]
against this change
|
|
Steroid Abuser
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:04:00 -
[401]
Edited by: Steroid Abuser on 26/07/2008 23:04:09 AGAINST
spending almost 1 year of skillpoints to have them just made Worthless is not my idea of a cool thing
|
Veronica D'Vaughn
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:04:00 -
[402]
against
|
Pattern Clarc
Invicta.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:06:00 -
[403]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 26/07/2008 23:06:30 Some quotes the CCP should take into consideration.
Quote: 1) The nerf doesn't fix anything, ships will still be able to go beyond the magic number and receive no damage, it's just a little harder. The mechanics is broken, hit effects and missiles are heavily simplified, instead of motion predictive effects, acceleration or deltaV, you have raw speed and transversal vs range determine the damage you receive. Until you fix this, you will not receive a fair mechanic for either side.
2) Most of the PvP'ers who you see as for nano's, are really just against the ******s you can't figure out how to deal with a tactic in the game. The real question is how do you deal with neuts and ECM?
3) 100mill ISK Cruisers flying at 2-3kms (before gang mods) did actually make sense, they where not immune to all damage, just stupid caldari HAM spammers (lasers really hurt Sad) and had a use/role outside that of what battlecruisers and frigs did.
4) People just can't seem to grasp the fact that you cant kill what you can't catch, it's a fundamental law of nature, if it's faster than you, it's going to get away, just as people will blob or go home when faced with an objective. It's just sheer pandering and idiocy that suggests we should be able to 'force engagements' magically, against anything that we are unable to out manoeuvre.
5) And what happens when we force an engagement???? The magical holy grail of PvP???? You either tank and gank, die, get ECM'ed or lag strikes and your left with the role of a dice... 80% of tactics and strategy in EvE revolves around starting a fight, unfortunately, it's like masturbating with sandpaper with a pay-off less pleasant than a poke in the eye with a rusty stick. Until there are more real time tactics in eve you shouldn't be touting that OMG, we cant force engagements bullcrap.
6) Most of EvE's problems fundamentally revolves around the laziness/ineptitude of the dev's, it took them 1 year to write that dev blog, jesusteddy****ingchrist, someone give them a noble prize.
Quote: the nerfing of nanos only serves to strengthen the DEFENSIVE side of EVE even more. The defense already has an undeniable advantage in large-scale gameplay, thus REDUCING fights. Nerfing nanos brings the scale even more in favor of a defensive style of play, thus REDUCING fights.
CCP needs to learn that they need to facilitate OFFENSIVE play, to make ATTACKING the normal mode of play. Offense is dynamic, defense is static and boring. Do they want to turn the game into a feudal contest where nobody leaves their borders except to siege a POS?
|
Gripen
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:10:00 -
[404]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Originally by: Steel Tigeress Wow, alt voting ftl....
Don't worry too much. The CSM admins have a way to see how many actual accounts support rather than individual supports (which can obviously be 3 per account). When this gets to the wire we'll be able to call for an accurate indication of player sentiment either way (this and the pro-nerf camp).
Image by Xaen
|
Faragher
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:13:00 -
[405]
Against
Completely stupid idea and badly thought out. |
AnmmnA
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:13:00 -
[406]
I support Nano-nerf
|
Jinx Barker
GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:13:00 -
[407]
100% Against NANO nerf.
|
Solid Trust
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:15:00 -
[408]
against
|
Delos Korelian
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:15:00 -
[409]
I believe the nerf is to heavy handed. They need to readjust it.
|
Bobby2Sox
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:15:00 -
[410]
Against |
|
Kingdon Brunel
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:17:00 -
[411]
Against |
Himphotep 87
Caldari Capital Produce Free Trade Zone.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:17:00 -
[412]
against
|
Voxis
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:18:00 -
[413]
Against the nerf in its cutrrnt form.
I am especially against nerfing my 3 Billion worth of implants.
|
Pattern Clarc
Invicta.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:19:00 -
[414]
Originally by: AnmmnA I support Nano-nerf
lol, posting in the anti nerf thread ftl
|
Gho Higyidr
Black Serpent Technologies Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:20:00 -
[415]
Edited by: Gho Higyidr on 26/07/2008 23:20:58
Originally by: Voxis Against the nerf in its cutrrnt form.
I am especially against nerfing my 3 Billion worth of implants.
Against. I think it could use a little nerfing, however not the the extent in the blog. And why would one make implants that cost 3 BILLION only to nerf the living f*** outta them and screw gamers out of a lot os isk. That's just not fair.
|
Atreus Danerun
Caldari Bank
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:21:00 -
[416]
Against the stupid nerf! CCP is making a mistake.
T2 SALES & SERVICE
|
RuleoftheBone
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:22:00 -
[417]
Against.
Also...nerf bios.
"Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the **** out of my way" General George Patton USA
|
Emerald FlintDeadEye
Amarr
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:23:00 -
[418]
Against. This nerf kills a lot of tactics in PvP.
|
Crushall
eXceed Inc. eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:23:00 -
[419]
Against
|
Sister MaryElephant
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 23:23:00 -
[420]
I am so against this.
My braids are uncurling.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |