Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tadehiro
Blue Labs Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 22:37:00 -
[1471]
Edited by: Tadehiro on 01/08/2008 22:38:05 AGAINST!
|
Nephtalius
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 22:39:00 -
[1472]
Against the speed nerf
|
Ituralde
Stimulus
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 23:09:00 -
[1473]
These ideas bring EVE in the wrong direction.
_____________________________ Fear is the mind-killer.
|
Nemesor
Stimulus
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 23:09:00 -
[1474]
Ummm. See previous posts.
|
Tyzzara
Stimulus
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 23:10:00 -
[1475]
I am all for changing the game. However, we need to implement changes that promote small gang warfare as much as they do large fleet battles. FW is an excellent start but they could do more with future nerfs and other modifications. Also each race is supposed to have different strengths and weaknesses. That is the point. They are not supposed to be so balanced as to be exactly the same.
Props to CCP for constant innovation and keeping pace but come up with something that does not hinder small gang style warfare to this extent.
I think some of the changes are warranted but don't kill small gang abilities to fight the blob. Leave us some kind of option other than blobbing up right along with them.
Against for these reasons.
|
Princess 02
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 23:31:00 -
[1476]
NO SUPPORT!!!
This is a typical example why DEMOCRACY can be a joke... hence NOT the BEST way of doing things...
|
Jonny Damordred
Stimulus
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 23:51:00 -
[1477]
A vote against the nerf is a vote for small-gang pvp. Down with the blob.
Cheers, Jonny D. ------------------------- CEO and Professor of Gunboat Diplomacy |
Bacchanalian
Stimulus
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 01:04:00 -
[1478]
Originally by: Jonny Damordred A vote against the nerf is a vote for small-gang pvp. Down with the blob.
Cheers, Jonny D.
What this brilliant man has said. ____________________ GM Sunshine > oops Neurotica > Hate to see a GM in your gang say 'oops'
|
Xaiah Darlis
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 01:07:00 -
[1479]
And of course, I agree as well.
|
DasDizzy
Developmental Neogenics Amalgamated
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 01:30:00 -
[1480]
Adapt or die you ****tards [/sig start] Due to popular request i have now added a thing to show where my sig starts
In federate gallente, armor tanks YOU [sig end]
|
|
Ephemeron
Retribution Corp.
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 01:41:00 -
[1481]
Originally by: DasDizzy Adapt or die you ****tards
- Brought you by people who failed to adapt to nanos
|
BlackMoon Thrawn
Stimulus
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 01:53:00 -
[1482]
While I support a nerf of polycarbs, snakes and a stacking penalty on all speed mods I oppose everything else being implemented. If some minor tweaks don't solve the problem revisit it a couple months down the road.
|
Jim Linger
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 02:28:00 -
[1483]
CPP putting their pistol in their mouth again.
Make the right choice.
i'm not an alt i just post like one |
evilphoenix
3vil Industries Efferus Vehemens Inasnum Latrocinium
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 02:30:00 -
[1484]
I disagree with the nerf. --------
|
Insertclevernamehere
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 02:38:00 -
[1485]
S
W
G
|
Pheonix Kanan
Caldari D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 02:48:00 -
[1486]
Originally by: Ephemeron
Originally by: DasDizzy Adapt or die you ****tards
- Brought you by people who failed to adapt to nanos
TRUTH! |
BobMoo22
Radically Awesome People Eaters
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 03:26:00 -
[1487]
/signed
|
Yorku
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 03:30:00 -
[1488]
I say the nano nerf should not happpen. It's only planned because people complain about how nano ships are overpowered. After all, that is bull. They are not overpowered, people just cant adapt to how people fit their ships. Ok - if you spend a billion isk on faction fitting of a nano ship and all your skills are maxed to 5, and you have a gang with perfect nano bonuses, then you are nearly untouchable. But I think in that case you deserve to live anyways. Webs exist in the game for a reason. (This also means the web nerf would not work.) The nerf needs to be revised.
/signed
|
Sylthi
Minmatar Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 05:35:00 -
[1489]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
This issue counts as the most popular public issue for the coming August 3rd meeting so we will be discussing it. I've certainly done some testing myself on SISI and I'd advise as many people as possible to do that too. Go there, form up nano gangs and anti nano gangs and see if its possible now for speed to escape 0.0 bubble gamps. Make sure the BH's and devs get to see for themselves what happens. Basically - having a huge ass thread like this is good for highlighting the issue and now thats certainly been done - but its now time to get testing on SISI and coming up with some specific proposals for how to improve the changes suggested in the devblog.
This. Get to it people. Give the devs in game examples of why all of these changes are a bad thing or they are going to blatently ignore popular demand like always. I, for one, am doing my part, have you done yours gentle reader?
*
* |
Molicious
coracao ardente Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 05:58:00 -
[1490]
AGAINST THE NERF!!!
I was right, once they did the testing on sisi they needed to nerf missiles again cus people whined, and probably going to look at ecm and neuts again. when is it going to stop???? OH NO I DIED pls make pvp damage 1/5 of pve damage like wow!!!
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!
|
|
TripleDistilled Pownage
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 07:55:00 -
[1491]
Edited by: TripleDistilled Pownage on 02/08/2008 08:03:01 think before you act ccp, nerfing nano should be done EXTREMELY CAREFULLY, one thing at a time. your proposing to much to fast, as many ppl have said already do one or 2 changes, see how it goes, and proceed from there. and seriously, 5 hours? 5 whole hours you thought about this and you release that blog? dont they see the rammifications of even the slightest nerf to nano? pull your heads out of your asses and look around. **** im not even against a nano nerf, having bs's fly around at 4-5km/s is ludicurous but you need not destroy nano'ing as a tactic because some people have found a loophole in a system YOU designed. your system needs some fine tunning, maybe having mass reduction work on an exponential scale, meaning the heavier the ship is, it is exponentially harder to make is go faster by reducing its mass, thats just my opinion
|
Jita Johnny
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 08:10:00 -
[1492]
Quite possibly the worst set of proposed changes I have ever seen from CCP. |
Kolmogorow
Freedom Resources
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 11:14:00 -
[1493]
No Nerf!
|
Tar Sonn
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 11:20:00 -
[1494]
Against
|
chopsypaul
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 11:22:00 -
[1495]
No to nano nerf
|
Darc Kaahar
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 11:54:00 -
[1496]
Edited by: Darc Kaahar on 02/08/2008 11:54:04
Originally by: Xaiah Darlis And of course, I agree as well.
I agree with you. I love you.
Against o7 o7 o7
|
Karentaki
Maximum Yarrage
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 12:45:00 -
[1497]
Originally by: Jonny Damordred A vote against the nerf is a vote for small-gang pvp. Down with the blob.
Cheers, Jonny D.
QFT However, now you are just reading my signature... Or are you...
========= Sporks FTW |
Callie Nefarious
Atomic Battle Penguins The Darwin Award Foundation
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 12:55:00 -
[1498]
We dont need that kind of nerfs. /signed
|
Pheleus
Federation of Freedom Fighters
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 13:06:00 -
[1499]
As much as i support this topic CCP will just do whatever they want so it is really not that worth while.
|
Gregorius Decimus
Caldari Unseen Chimera The Unseen Company
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 13:09:00 -
[1500]
Definitively against!
-=Perfect Dream=- |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |