Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ellatan
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:07:00 -
[241]
Edited by: Ellatan on 26/07/2008 20:07:51 Against Nano-nerf. I think that scrambler idea (maybe a little modified) is great though bringing some life back to Gallente Recons. ECM should be looked at imho, but most of all Lag issues.
|
THE CHAOSMASTER
Mark Septim Corp Fang Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:14:00 -
[242]
AGAINST NERF --------------------- Arrrrgh, i ll consume your brain and your market... |
Silver Leaflet
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:14:00 -
[243]
Against.
|
Lab freak
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:15:00 -
[244]
AGAINST
|
Lemonx
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:16:00 -
[245]
Supported |
LightSnow
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:16:00 -
[246]
I'm AGAINST the nano nerf
|
Death One
Starbridge
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:16:00 -
[247]
Against nerf.
|
Bakumatsu
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:17:00 -
[248]
Voting against the nerf in its current form.
|
ISpydeRI
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:19:00 -
[249]
against ccp's fail ideas
|
Emy l
SoT
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:20:00 -
[250]
Against
|
|
Tzujeih
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:21:00 -
[251]
Originally by: Windjammer
Originally by: Tzujeih Lookit all these worthless fuggen posters.
If you don't test it out, your opinion is worthless.
Since nobody can test it yet, you're all worthless.
Now who do you suppose such a huge nerf will benefit? Goonswarm and their blob tactics? Naaaawwww. Couldn't be.
Windjammer
Now who do you suppose is a stupid pubbie crying tears over nerfs during their conception stage.
|
OxyG3n2143
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:23:00 -
[252]
Against
|
n4DuL
Minmatar Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:24:00 -
[253]
AGAINST OR I WILL CANCELL MY 2 ACCOUNTS ****ING STUPID NERF |
Windjammer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:25:00 -
[254]
Originally by: Tzujeih
Originally by: Windjammer
Originally by: Tzujeih Lookit all these worthless fuggen posters.
If you don't test it out, your opinion is worthless.
Since nobody can test it yet, you're all worthless.
Now who do you suppose such a huge nerf will benefit? Goonswarm and their blob tactics? Naaaawwww. Couldn't be.
Windjammer
Now who do you suppose is a stupid pubbie crying tears over nerfs during their conception stage.
If someone were to propose the banning of Goonswarm, Something Aweful, etc. from EVE, what would your response be? We need to test it on Sisi to determine if it's a bad idea? I think not.
Windjammer
|
Steel Tigeress
Gallente Steel-Wolfs
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:26:00 -
[255]
Originally by: n4DuL AGAINST OR I WILL CANCELL MY 2 ACCOUNTS
Goodbye!!
I find it verry funny that fron the looks of everyone against..ignoring alts.... that 70+% or so of all those against come from 3 or so alliances....
adapt or die nano***s.
|
Aimel
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:26:00 -
[256]
against
|
Nas Xafat
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:27:00 -
[257]
AGAINST OR I WILL CANCELL MY 2 ACCOUNTS
|
n4DuL
Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:29:00 -
[258]
AGAINST OR I WILL CANCELL MY 2 ACCOUNTS ****ING STUPID NERF |
Daemi
R.u.S.H. - Fanatics Ultima Rati0
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:30:00 -
[259]
Edited by: Daemi on 26/07/2008 20:31:15 against nerf! ________________________________________________ I am Alpha and Omega, beginning and the end, the first and the last.... |
Ellatan Deruimte
HAMMER -N- SICKEL Stain Empire
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:31:00 -
[260]
Against nano-nerf.
|
|
beth blaze
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:35:00 -
[261]
against
|
Imperius Blackheart
KIA Corp KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:37:00 -
[262]
Edited by: Imperius Blackheart on 26/07/2008 20:37:16 Edited by: Imperius Blackheart on 26/07/2008 20:36:57 Nano needs to be dealt with but buff the counters don't remove the cause. No matter what you might think speed is *fun*... and fun is important.
A lot of what is proposed is completely over the top. Consider perhaps a Hictor script which has a slight web effect or something of that nature... The MWD nerf is OTT. And don't get me started on the web nerf...
Proud member of the Caldari Death Squad
|
Shadoo
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:37:00 -
[263]
Free Gneeznow!
|
Blade Slinger
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:37:00 -
[264]
So against this. Nerf speed, not all of EVE.
|
Lagkills
Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:37:00 -
[265]
Edited by: Lagkills on 26/07/2008 20:38:22 Supported
Damn nice lolizers... |
Risto Roisto
Spacegoat Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:37:00 -
[266]
FOR the nerf. Even though it might require quite a bit balancing before releasing it on TQ.
|
Shmeil
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:37:00 -
[267]
Against nano-nerf.
|
Marchant LaCroix
Gallente Ma-Ven Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:38:00 -
[268]
Goodbye nano ships. I won't miss you one bit.
|
Dungar Loghoth
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:39:00 -
[269]
Edited by: Dungar Loghoth on 26/07/2008 20:39:04 Way too much. Fix polys, evaluate after a month or two and see if more nerfing is required. You're changing too much too quickly. ---
|
Tobias Lee
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 20:46:00 -
[270]
Just nerf all nano equipment same way as warp core stabs with a lock range and or penalty per module fitted ie overdrive polycarb etc means u can still rig for speed for running away but pretty crap for pvp. It worked for the core stabs dont see people flying with 4 stabs on now.
I'm more concerned with halving the webber penalty that sucks makes huggins a pile of crap :(
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |