Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Centra Spike
Reaper Industries Eternal Rapture
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 00:18:00 -
[2101]
Just read the patch notes...who wants my stuff?
You guys took a sandblaster to a soup cracker. ------
|

Leyline777
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 00:18:00 -
[2102]
Edited by: Leyline777 on 09/11/2008 00:26:29 Edited by: Leyline777 on 09/11/2008 00:22:11
Originally by: Windjammer
Originally by: Tzujeih Lookit all these worthless fuggen posters.
If you don't test it out, your opinion is worthless.
Since nobody can test it yet, you're all worthless.
Now who do you suppose such a huge nerf will benefit? Goonswarm and their blob tactics? Naaaawwww. Couldn't be.
Windjammer
heh true stuff... oh wait and we HAVE been testing it on sisi, but ccp is from iceland apparently they dont teach reading comprehension or customer service or both there...
In other news the link to warhammer online is here (great new content coming their way it looks like if you read that heavy metal article).
And ofc the obligatory Wrath of the Lich King and WoW Community site is Here. --
My sig doesn't fit and the sig limit is ******ed >>. (yes this is a "jetcan".. get over it) |

FVZA
Dark Dominion
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 00:39:00 -
[2103]
Against ---------------------------------
Need a can flipped? Contact me in game. |

Sephrin
Minmatar Imperium Forces Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 04:10:00 -
[2104]
This patch affects way to many aspects of the game to be well thought through. I try and cut CCP alot of slack and go on faith most of the time, but the release date of this expansion combined with the current SiSi revision does not make me feel like this expansion is going to do much of anything good for the eve universe.
I vote no
|

Splaterbug
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 04:46:00 -
[2105]
/signed
|

Yon89
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 06:01:00 -
[2106]
i like my vaga ============= SIG SIG SIG |

Mickey Simon
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 06:01:00 -
[2107]
I'm against the nerf, because it's so far reaching. I agree with it in principle - some ships shouldn't go as fast as they can currently go. However, I disagree with how this readjustment is being handled. Speed is related to everything, and therefore adjusting it completely (like is being done) means adjusting almost everything else. More time needs to be spent to find a correct, or even an agreeable answer.
|

Gaelenus
Gallente Society of the Crimson Flame
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 06:07:00 -
[2108]
And CCP still ignores this        
|

nukebie
The Establishment
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 07:33:00 -
[2109]
against the blob encouraging nerf. Sigh... eve was fun... once.
|

Xathytoz
Roswell Project Victimz
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 07:40:00 -
[2110]
Yeeha, ofc I wanna trash my Deimps... respectively, with the upcoming changes even Zulupark's 6/4/5-Deimos with Rep bonus would've made more sense... :( CCP, STOP THIS MADNESS, speed-patch REALLY has not just to be postponed but to be REVISED!
|

Don Shadow
Viper Squad
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 08:26:00 -
[2111]
CCP, give me back my game! 
|

Meister75th
Caldari Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 09:02:00 -
[2112]
Edited by: Meister75th on 09/11/2008 09:04:16 *Ahem*
1500 vs 230000?
Yeah.. Can I haz all ur stuffz!?
hello nano nerf, goodbye lamers!
|

Thoruos
Armageddon Day
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 09:38:00 -
[2113]
/signed
|

oni911b
Suns Of Korhal
|
Posted - 2008.11.09 19:48:00 -
[2114]
If i recall we asked for hacs that cant go faster than inties not blobfests. Well that stacless io will be usefull to handle upcoming blobfest.
|

Max Leadfoot
Murky Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 02:51:00 -
[2115]
|

Milan Sovilj
Ergo Abstergo
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 04:35:00 -
[2116]
A G A I N S T !
|

Veryez
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 07:01:00 -
[2117]
This fundamental change to combat is wrong in so many ways, I HATE the direction that eve is going. These combat changes are HORRIBLE, does CCP actually think that these changes are going to do ANYTHING other than promote blobs? CCP's history is not good, they ALWAYS overnerf something, then are forced to buff it 1 to 2 years later. The question is do you feel like waiting 2 years for CCP to correct this mistake?
The whole premise that small ships can fight large ships is flawed. Of course a battleship won't be able to solo an AF, so what will it do - join up with 10+ of his buddies. Sorry but this 'change' works against small gang and solo PvP - so much for our sandbox. Welcome to SWG II.
|

ARGH69
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 07:25:00 -
[2118]
AGAINST!
all they had to do was increase the mass of cruisers so that they can no longer be made to go faster than interceptors and it would have solved the nano problem. instead they completely change the missile damage formula where a specialized cruise missile fired from a stealth bomber (a ship designed to alpha strike and destroy small ships in one volley) will no longer be able to alpha strike a frigate going 150 m/sec or faster, despite the cruise missiles going 7,500 m/sec towards it.
i will be forced to quit the game for good as i feel like my years of training in missiles will be useless in pvp and solo stealth bomber pilots will become obsolete.
|

Savage Roar
Storm Thesis
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 09:01:00 -
[2119]
/signed and yes, this is my sig. IBTL |

Teraos
Genos Occidere Heretic Nation
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 11:05:00 -
[2120]
Against!
|

Iva Soreass
Black Plague.
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 12:23:00 -
[2121]
/supported
wow im so shocked that ccp are going ahead with this and just aint listening, oh wait no im not......SWG//Planetside All over again.
|

Ag3nT 0rang3
DamageDealer Inc
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 12:48:00 -
[2122]
Against!
|

desintox
Square Dimensions
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 14:36:00 -
[2123]
Edited by: desintox on 10/11/2008 14:38:29 They never listened to the community about the speednerf, they even referred to their blog post from July 2008 wich first announced the proposed changes to speed.
Nothing has been changed since that was announced... and CCP wanted player feedback?
LOOK AT THIS - 72 PAGES OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK - NOTHING .. NOTHING IS CHANGED ?
|

Divine Infinity
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 14:41:00 -
[2124]
AGAINST it completely. And yes, is really bad if you do that, only possibility for players is to quit if they are against that. And i think I might take this into account.
|

Ruri Dant
Onorata Societa
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 16:07:00 -
[2125]
NO NANO NERF
|

Orar Ironfist
Digital assassins
|
Posted - 2008.11.10 20:22:00 -
[2126]
against
|

Verstal
Incredibuilders United
|
Posted - 2008.11.12 03:51:00 -
[2127]
Edited by: Verstal on 12/11/2008 03:56:11
/SIGNED for 3 accounts 9 total characters! As stated many times this is the worst patch in the history of Eve, these accounts are about to expire because of how much I hate these changes, everything is canceled.
|

Quicktime
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.11.12 04:00:00 -
[2128]
/signed This is a great way to vote! The whole patch needs to be tossed out if you ask me, new ship is cool but not at the cost of the rest of the game, you can read my 10's of posts about how bad I think this patch is.
|

Mother Commander
|
Posted - 2008.11.12 04:03:00 -
[2129]
Edited by: Mother Commander on 12/11/2008 04:03:11 /signed
|

altish McN0tmymain
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.11.12 14:42:00 -
[2130]
1 step forwards and 6 steps back, well done once again ccp. signed
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |