| Pages: 1 [2] |
21. New Alliance Abilities? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Now, tell me, how is this small corp going to take over constellation? Hmm? With the big alliances roaming around single corps can hardly take over a constellation. Unless that corp is incredibly powerful in which case ganksquads are not threat ...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.08.24 06:00:00
|
22. New Alliance Abilities? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malachon Draco Originally by: Thelmarr Those alliances already have all the benefits they need, no reason to add to them foolproof (besides serious attack force which would be fought anyway) bordercontrol to prevent ...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.08.23 11:42:00
|
23. New Alliance Abilities? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Thelmarr on 23/08/2006 10:28:10 Originally by: Malachon Draco Originally by: Thelmarr Originally by: Malachon Draco In concept I like some of the ideas. But I would agree that defense of a system should be do...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.08.23 10:25:00
|
24. New Alliance Abilities? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
No it does not. It would mean that such outposts would be fitted into chokepoint systems, perhaps in entrance and exit both, and after that alliance has effectively closed huge piece of space without need to put actual player effort to it beyond r...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.08.23 09:02:00
|
25. New Alliance Abilities? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malachon Draco In concept I like some of the ideas. But I would agree that defense of a system should be done primarily by players, not structures. So any defenses on gates, should be very limited and in itself more intend...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.08.23 08:27:00
|
26. New Alliance Abilities? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Not bad idea necessarily but it has one fault. It moves defending territory from players to structures. I myself am a firm believer of "if you can't defend it yourself, you should not claim it"-policy. Meaning that if alliance cannot have enough...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.08.23 08:10:00
|
27. Hare-Brained Insta Idea - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well, like you said it has one problem of being such ISK intensive solution. Or alliance since they control 0.0 Basically it makes newer players, specially ones without any alliance with 0.0, much more vulnerable causing them to venture even less...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.08.23 06:59:00
|
28. Mining Platform - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Thelmarr on 08/08/2006 05:32:37 I don't honestly like it. If alliance does not have motivated enough miner division they are doing something wrong and should reconsider way they are performing their business. Macroplant doing their...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.08.08 05:31:00
|
29. Kali and its effect on 0.0? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well, regardless of method Empire should expand more. If not to existing 0.0 then to new sectors. Why? Because that is where this game is mainly paid. And no, trying to push people forcefully to lowsec against their will is not going to work and...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.08.04 05:26:00
|
30. Warp Timer: Forcing PvP - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ellaine TashMurkon Forcing pvp is not the good way. Space is vast, its perfectly logical that someone can easily hide in a system that is few billion km (or something) wide. Good way is to encourage pvp. Give more resources...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.07.27 11:03:00
|
31. Forced PVP - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ellaine TashMurkon No, just the oposite. Things for larger public hit top sales and fade away when newer things for larger public emerge. Things for limited public survive longer. Sooner or later, blizzard or other industry ...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.07.25 07:27:00
|
32. Forced PVP - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ellaine TashMurkon Originally by: Corporate Dispatcher Originally by: Maya Rkell The game isn't for everyone. It might not be for you. *Sells CCP shares/buys stock in a company that is "for everyone"* ...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.07.25 06:53:00
|
33. Solid objects - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Served load young padawan. Everything done in the game has to be processed by servers, no matter how insignificant or minor. And those minor things add up as there are thousands of people doing them.
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.07.18 05:12:00
|
34. Locking Limits for Better PvP - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think this idea has certain merit. It would force fleets to break up into smaller subgroups working independently instead of putting all the blob shooting at one target. Would open whole new ideas for fleet combat.
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.06.28 12:05:00
|
35. Make the PVE more interesting. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lienzo I would prefer to see mission takers as contractors. Contractors would be able to hire other players, and quite readily those not in their corp, to help finish those missions. The contractor would have to pay an unre...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.06.27 06:12:00
|
36. Make Your Own System - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Zarch AlDain Originally by: ghosttr I think tht if such a thing were to be implemented there should be a smaller class of pos the newer payer will have access to earlier on. I dont hink its right to make the bigger b...
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.06.22 11:13:00
|
37. Cargo Bay / Drone Bay - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yup. It's deliberate. You go to battle with whatever drones you loaded up. Prevents insane dronespamming (not that biggest gallente ships would not have huge dronebays. which I am not complaining about since I'm gallente using drones!)
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.06.22 10:08:00
|
38. New Drone Command - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ehm... You could for example put them in a group and rightclick on the group bar to give orders to all. And IIRC same works when you click on "Local space" bar.
- by Thelmarr - at 2006.06.22 09:11:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |