Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Strange issue with Planetary - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Scenario: Two pilots, two ships, two different computers, same 'person' sitting at the desk. Go to a planet with first ship and open the hangar or customs office. Go to a planet with second ship and jettison goodies for the first pilot to us...
- by Titen - at 2010.08.29 17:15:00
|
2. Whats your bang for buck ideas? (small change, big impact) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Some sort of keystroke combo that would allow you to center the HUD's tactical overlay on a selected object. Right now the overlay simply starts at your own ship and spreads out away from it. It would be nice to be able to have the 'center' of ...
- by Titen - at 2010.08.18 12:51:00
|
3. Excuse me, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's hard to believe someone would actually tout BP as a potential threat to anything, other than some unsuspecting dimwit's wallet. I got an invite to join the beta of BP, and signed on for it. After signing up I not only got bi-monthly offers t...
- by Titen - at 2010.08.18 12:09:00
|
4. Suggestion for SBU warfare - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Being on the business end of SBU spam, it is obvious that the mechanic for placing them needs some tweaking. I am not talking about the timers, when they are vulnerable or not vulnerable, or even how much space they take up in the ships that deli...
- by Titen - at 2010.08.18 00:43:00
|
5. How CCP ruined their game. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's an isk ratio that decides risk, not whether or not an individual thinks 1 v 1 must always have an equal chance. Might as well say Battleships are overpowered because they can kill a Frigate. Assume a decently fit BS has 120m isk invested in...
- by Titen - at 2010.06.29 13:55:00
|
6. Project Phoenix Eve Client UI redesign project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not really related to the actual "UI" as far as controls go, but I'd love to see the stupid auto-level effect on ships go away. Example: A. Outbound gate is above your ship (up) B. You align to that gate, then stop your ship C. When your ship ...
- by Titen - at 2010.05.07 15:06:00
|
7. Change, Fix, or back in time .,, you would - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A couple things actually... Go back in time to before 'warp to zero'.. when we had to have BM's to land zero on a gate or face the potential of a camped gate. Second, go back to stealth bombers that couldn't warp while cloaked. Yes, I do love th...
- by Titen - at 2010.05.07 14:44:00
|
8. In-Game Browser no Longer Functions - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
After strolling through other posts on these forums, I've seen another 'error' that has been reported that I see at times myself. I'll be cruising through space, or spinning in a station, and suddenly the EvE client shuts down for no apparent rea...
- by Titen - at 2010.04.22 13:43:00
|
9. In-Game Browser no Longer Functions - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Not sure what the deal is, but every site I attempt to go to with the in-game browser returns "Error loading requested URL The connection was refused Error Code: -102" Was working with no problems half an hour ago. My alt account (on a separate...
- by Titen - at 2010.04.21 14:30:00
|
10. A Suicide Ganker's Final Solution for the Insurance Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
My point is that the idea of removing insurance completely is valid. The idea of removing concord from the game is also valid. If we remove insurance, NOTHING else either needs to be modified or added to the mechanic to balance the isk loss when ...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.27 04:35:00
|
11. A Suicide Ganker's Final Solution for the Insurance Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alternate suggestion: 1. Remove Concord from all 0.9 systems and lower 2. Remove all belts from 1.0 systems, other than new player training areas 3. Increase security status hit for agression in 0.5 and higher systems 4. Once a player's sec statu...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.27 00:31:00
|
12. A Suicide Ganker's Final Solution for the Insurance Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ok, so mineral prices are too low. That's because there are no major wars going on that have losses attached to them. Most capital ships are parked due to the latest patch and it's interesting changes to their combat abilities. Sov wars are being ...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.26 22:08:00
|
13. Why is it everytime an alliance starts losing they insta-disband? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Most 0.0 alliances are just a bunch of carebears who do nothing but hide behind their numbers in order to maintain what they feel is 'dominance' over their chosen opponent. These alliances recruit 'PvP' corps to come into their mix, but in the en...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.26 21:40:00
|
14. A Suicide Ganker's Final Solution for the Insurance Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So the 'problem', as it's being explained, is that the mineral prices are too high - making miners rich beyond the dreams of a combat pilot, so high pay for mining needs to be ended. Yet, it's also being claimed, that ships are selling for such l...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.26 20:39:00
|
15. A Suicide Ganker's Final Solution for the Insurance Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Since removing insurance from self-destruct wont work (just as easy to fly to a hostile POS or get a buddy to pop your ship for you), it wont work to stop the practice. Removing insurance from any ship where Concord shows up to kill it makes the ...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.26 20:16:00
|
16. Playing 5+ Years and this is making me feel like a noob - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lord Windu The standing needs to be between you and the agent, agents corporation or the agents faction. Your corp doesn't come into it. Even though I have not yet finished my first cup of java this morning, I get a feel...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.19 13:55:00
|
17. Playing 5+ Years and this is making me feel like a noob - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I was going through my standings, looking for a nice new agent to play with, when I came across a suitable candidate.. or so I thought. Their info says, "You must have an effective Corporate, Faction or Personal standing of 6.00 to use this agent...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.19 13:40:00
|
18. Is it fair to say at this point Dominion is a failure? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP could save themselves a lot of pain if they would just address the issues that have plagued the game for years, that continually get complained about, that shouldn't be too hard to find a fix for, instead of focusing on 'let us promise and ann...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.17 19:28:00
|
19. Is it fair to say at this point Dominion is a failure? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I believe it was in a pre-Dominion video from fanfest that one of the big goals of the new sov system was stated: "We dont want POS's to be the basis for sov, they were never intended to do that. We dont want players to log off one day and then l...
- by Titen - at 2009.12.17 16:31:00
|
20. Defending against can flippers - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
"by the time I lock him, he's already off" Solution: Lock him the instant you think he's lining up to flip your can. Drones out - set to PASSIVE This way you dont have to wait to lock him until 'after' he flips the can, your drones are already p...
- by Titen - at 2009.10.17 14:06:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |