| Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rakshasa Taisab wrote: Weaselior wrote: Rakshasa Taisab wrote: Good news everyone, CCP has just implemented one such feature! While I'm not sure why I would expect the person who thought anom and sig scanning uncovered things like this...
- by Vatek - at 2013.10.17 18:46:00
|
2. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kismeteer wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: Kismeteer wrote: This actually hurts small operations way worse. 1. Find 1 man reaction/moon mining corp. 2. Find out his schedule, go to sleep, when he wakes up. 3. Wait for him to sleep. 4. You now have...
- by Vatek - at 2013.10.17 18:07:00
|
3. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
MeBiatch wrote: IrJosy wrote: It's the opposite actually. Jabber leak: (11:16:23 AM) aryth: this isn't going to crush us. it will crush everyone who doesn't rent (11:16:31 AM) aryth: which means everyone will rent. which means everyone w...
- by Vatek - at 2013.10.17 17:40:00
|
4. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Legion wrote: Once this is out we will be keeping an eye on how players use it, both via feedback here and metrics that we gather. We can then rebalance it accordingly to make sure it is not completely unbalanced or if it is used as a pure ...
- by Vatek - at 2013.10.17 17:32:00
|
5. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Anybody posting in this thread with HAHA SUCK ON THAT POS HAVERS attitudes has clearly never owned or operated a pos before. It's already ****** enough.
- by Vatek - at 2013.10.17 17:00:00
|
6. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Paradox wrote: The Warfish wrote: Will destroyed Siphons result in a Structure Killmail, a la POS Modules? If not, it should. Yes, Kill Reports will be generated including the information on what was dropped/destroyed. Is this ev...
- by Vatek - at 2013.10.17 16:58:00
|
7. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Callic Veratar wrote: With a max 50km deploy range, you'll always be in the range of POS guns when you deploy the syphon. You can't cloak while locked and interceptors have almost no tank. Not sure how AFK cloaking is a problem here. POS gun...
- by Vatek - at 2013.10.17 16:49:00
|
8. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Benjamin Hamburg wrote: Vatek wrote: Making these 20m3 in size and having no limit on how many can be placed on one tower is a horrible design decision. One pilot in a blockade runner could seed a nullsec region with hundreds of these and sh...
- by Vatek - at 2013.10.17 16:26:00
|
9. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This is a terrible design decision. One pilot in a blockade runner could seed a nullsec region with hundreds of these and shut down all moon mining income until the owners of the towers show up to pos gun them all to death. Then they can just go ...
- by Vatek - at 2013.10.17 16:14:00
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Brains! NOM NOM! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dersen Lowery wrote: If it's so critical to PVP in EVE that the aggressor show up in the same paper ship he's always used, and that he has the full help and support of rats to take down his target, I'm sure CCP could find some way to rationaliz...
- by Vatek - at 2012.10.26 15:30:00
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Brains! NOM NOM! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: You know they're not really listening. Funny story about that. We are. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=155703&p=12 You have not addressed PVP concerns at all othe...
- by Vatek - at 2012.10.23 17:14:00
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Brains! NOM NOM! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: Null sec ganks of people running PvE content. This does have an effect on that no doubt. To be honest yes this means you will no longer be able to do this solo in a stealth bomber. I however just tested it and was able to tank six frigat...
- by Vatek - at 2012.10.22 17:43:00
|
13. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Roime wrote: Lol @ goon pleb nerd rage Why blame CCP? All they did was enforcing the TOS/EULA and gave Mittens a temp ban. You all know they had no other choice. He resigned from his position as CSM chair, probably because he felt it was the ...
- by Vatek - at 2012.03.29 00:10:00
|
14. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Schettino wrote: All those crying about the 10k vote loss. The player has been banned and is out of the game -> LOSS OF REPRESENTATION. PERIOD Blame the player himself and NOT CCP. Sorry, no. There needs to be a system in place so th...
- by Vatek - at 2012.03.28 23:58:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |