| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. WTB 60d GTC x1 750mil - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
much obliged
- by Zhulik - at 2009.06.26 08:22:00
|
2. Which shield tankers can tackle effectively... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I hear rapiers and huginns tackle rather effectively, durrr. -Sincerily yours, Cpt. O ----- My views reflect those of my corp completely and entirely. My corpmates will gladly go to war over my forum antics.
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.29 01:34:00
|
3. Real drawback on astronautics rig ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Yeah, the cost is enough of a drawback for me not to fit them in most cases. Being cheap is fun. ----- My views reflect those of my corp completely and entirely. My corpmates will gladly go to war over my forum antics.
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.20 01:19:00
|
4. New Scorpion Model on SISI - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Come on, on the first one even the background is mirrored. ----- My views reflect those of my corp completely and entirely. My corpmates will gladly go to war over my forum antics.
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.20 00:31:00
|
5. Is it true what im hearing on the munnin - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I hear it can devour souls and fart COMMUNISM. ----- My views reflect those of my corp completely and entirely. My corpmates will gladly go to war over my forum antics.
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.19 23:28:00
|
6. Roadkill if you had any brains..... - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Peoke when the russians are coming. Don't we visit at least a couple of times every weekend though? :) ----- My views reflect those of my corp completely and entirely. My corpmates will gladly go to war over my forum ant...
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.19 21:46:00
|
7. Please Re-model Moa/Eagle - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
And do that to blackbird, rook and falcon while you're at it. Right now Rook and Falcon are imbalanced in their performance, former one being a falcon with more launchers. Which is totally fine, it isn't like one has to use missiles that much whe...
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.19 21:38:00
|
8. Proposed nano ship counter - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Just to clear something up: when I say "you", I mean noone in particular, but rather the collective image of your average forum nanodefender. I fly nanos. Mostly rapiers. And only three thing pose a real threat to a rapier: nano-curse, another ra...
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.13 23:58:00
|
9. Proposed nano ship counter - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Speaking of them "effective counters", why do you people always assume everyone has Energy Management @ 5 and is thus capable of overloading their webs? Those extra 3km aren't that much of a help against the majority of nanohomosexuals anyway. Ju...
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.13 23:31:00
|
10. How do you kill a huginn? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Damn, do I feel like Captain Obvious. Curse(sligthly nanoed) or heavy neuts, former preferred, arazu/lachesis. Another huginn/rapier and an arazu/lachesis. Four inties (expect casualties, heh) with webs and some dps. Or any combination of the ab...
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.13 23:10:00
|
11. New matari ships/drones from CCP? :-/ - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Zhulik on 06/02/2008 19:59:52 The joke is completely wasted on those who haven't seen the movie, and I doubt a lot of non-russians have. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin-dza-dza! You silly capitalist pigdogs still won't get it t...
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.06 19:58:00
|
12. So when are nano's gone? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Nanoishtars have got to go, everything else I'm fine with. Seriously, don't people fit conventional tanks on their ishtars anymore? Love people who fly nanodrakes(not too much nano tbh), nanoishtars, etc. and write something like "nanos are the a...
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.06 19:37:00
|
13. Battle Report R-6 and 89-j - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
God, I sure hope it not too late for us to leave this crappy alliance! ----- My views reflect those of my corp completely and entirely. My corpmates will gladly go to war over my forum antics.
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.04 01:24:00
|
14. Nerf EMP L - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Nerf EMP L all you want, just leave emp m alone, kay? There. Go back to your cardboard box now.
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.03 05:59:00
|
15. Tracking Disruptors [Devs.. you forgot something] - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
gasp! a stealth missile boost!
- by Zhulik - at 2008.02.03 05:09:00
|
16. Base resi change is on sisi - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
How come it says "amarr"? Sounds more like a minnie boost to me, reducing their "racial" resist on the shield and giving emp, their most damaging ammo type, more oomph when firing into armor. Not that I'm complaining though.
- by Zhulik - at 2008.01.30 22:40:00
|
17. Amarr Recon - Current state - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I like them the way they are, thank you very much :)
- by Zhulik - at 2008.01.09 06:07:00
|
18. Electronic Attack Ships/frigs - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Admiral Pelleon Just like AFs to HACS. But aren't AFs virtually useless and HACs quite well suited for a variety of purposes?
- by Zhulik - at 2007.12.30 06:16:00
|
19. Electronic Attack Ships/frigs - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Why is everyone so hyped about EAS? They aren't all that good and are massively outperformed by recons in every aspect. They are okay for noobs who want to see what the recons are like before training them, but other than that they seem like a jok...
- by Zhulik - at 2007.12.30 05:19:00
|
20. Non Nano Vaga - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
BLASPHEMY! /me shrieks like a fruit bat
- by Zhulik - at 2007.12.29 18:41:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |