| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. So are MS just that bad or is it just Kenny? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
wat
- by emf - at 2009.04.30 22:31:00
|
2. Major exploits. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: emf on 19/04/2009 11:20:43 Originally by: Zaraki KenpachiSan It is no possible that few people own hundreds, thousands of faction mods, faction ships, best named mods, billions over billions over billions in a simply ridicu...
- by emf - at 2009.04.19 11:20:00
|
3. WTF is with the 15 minute aggression timer? HE FIRED ON ME 1st! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It is 60 seconds right? I keep hearing 60 seconds as the right number but someone always comes along and says 30 seconds... Then it always feels like 30 seconds. Probably should just time it myself.
- by emf - at 2008.12.19 08:25:00
|
4. 3 years, CCP, 3 years - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: emf on 16/12/2008 19:04:52 Yes, but it is much more likely that if you get aggro in the short period of time your ship takes to emergency warp off, it is intentional. So it should follow the same set of rules as logging off with agg...
- by emf - at 2008.12.16 19:03:00
|
5. 3 years, CCP, 3 years - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Increase "disappear" timer to 120 seconds from 60 seconds. Problem solved.
- by emf - at 2008.12.16 17:51:00
|
6. Dev's my fighters have disappeared out of my carrier! Free booze!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just be patient, lol. =/ Although seeing an assortment of medium and light drones fly out of the carrier during a hotdrop is mildly disturbing.
- by emf - at 2008.12.12 00:45:00
|
7. Average ISK/hr? (mining, ratting, missioning, etc) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Banana Torres Edited by: Banana Torres on 11/12/2008 23:05:47 What is that funny symbol, like a dead snake being hit with a stick, that the OP puts in front of his money values? Anyway, I am lucky if I make 7M ISK/hour ...
- by emf - at 2008.12.12 00:21:00
|
8. Place your bets on the next Nerf! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd put my money on projectile weapons. I mean, they have such long falloff! If not, then the nafalgar, they need to flip it so that it's not so freaking vertical.
- by emf - at 2008.12.08 02:48:00
|
9. why dont devs try and make eve less tedious? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Then there's removing NPC sold shuttles to remove the tritanium price cap. They could just have quadrupled the price of NPC sold shuttles or reduced the amount of tritanium required to build it. But instead CCP decides to make it that much more te...
- by emf - at 2008.11.28 10:35:00
|
10. Aggro/deaggro games - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
90 seconds! Is that too much to ask for? Same with 90 seconds before disappearing when you log off without aggro. Fix both logoffski and aggro games at the same time.. But noooooo, CCP has to nerf webs 400% instead.....
- by emf - at 2008.11.27 06:32:00
|
11. The Web Nerf - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The part I don't understand the most is why CPP felt the need to hit so hard with the nerf stick. One would think that halving the effectiveness of webs would be already overkill. (2 new webs = 1 old web) They instead decide to reduce it's effec...
- by emf - at 2008.11.14 17:04:00
|
12. The Web Nerf - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: emf on 13/11/2008 14:59:55 Originally by: Terraform I agree that it's definitely a nerf to gatecamping... but i fail to see how that's even remotely a bad thing. I have entered low-sec 4 times in my whole eve-existence, ALL...
- by emf - at 2008.11.13 14:59:00
|
13. The Web Nerf - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Made 2 threads about this before the nerf, and sure enough the very first fight after the patch a webbed raven just goes back to the gate at a ridiculous speed and jumps.
- by emf - at 2008.11.13 14:45:00
|
14. I have an idea to fix cloaking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why so drastic, I think what most people want is just a possibility to scan down a cloaked ship. A new probe type for cloaked ships only usable by the exploration probe launcher and isn't all that accurate would make most people happy. Excessive u...
- by emf - at 2008.10.26 20:57:00
|
15. CCP, NERF nanos not buff them - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dianeces Originally by: emf Well a stabber goes faster without snakes and rigs currently. If anything 5km/s is a conservative speed for a post-nerf vagabond. Ahahahahahahahahahaha. Posting in a troll thread. ...
- by emf - at 2008.10.25 06:40:00
|
16. CCP, NERF nanos not buff them - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: emf on 25/10/2008 03:17:30 Heavy pulses already are the sex against nano ships. Just doesn't quite kill them but good enough... Patch won't change that. Oh, and the arazu would only have 18km range at recon ships V... Compared to ...
- by emf - at 2008.10.25 03:16:00
|
17. CCP, NERF nanos not buff them - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: emf on 25/10/2008 03:04:24 Interceptors? Why not just say rapiers, they work perfectly right now. After the nerf a 5km/s vagabond jumping into a gatecamp and getting double webbed by a rapier would travel at 800 m/s back towards the...
- by emf - at 2008.10.25 03:04:00
|
18. Confessions of an 2nd account miner - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: emf on 25/10/2008 02:35:26 Originally by: Breaker77 Edited by: Breaker77 on 25/10/2008 02:14:22 A hulk can make about 350,000 ISK per cycle (3 minutes) or about 1 million per 9 minutes just off of Veldspar. In short, go...
- by emf - at 2008.10.25 02:33:00
|
19. CCP, NERF nanos not buff them - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Red Thunder im killing loadsa nanos....so ur doin something wrong Well will you be killing less with webs ravaged?
- by emf - at 2008.10.25 02:07:00
|
20. CCP, NERF nanos not buff them - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well the ships which have to catch them are slower too. So I think they'd be able to run away just fine still.
- by emf - at 2008.10.24 20:19:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |