| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. [WTB] low sp char, but with HIGH standings to Caldari Navy. - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Only 6.97 standings but 1.23m sp?
- by narccissa - at 2009.03.17 10:42:00
|
2. Concerted Effort to beat Piracy? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: G'kek To be fair, PvP's in 0.0 sec seem to be the biggest cash cows. Pirates normally seem to buy low level frigs. That's why I was wondering if anyone had tried a concerted effort to fight piracy as they seem to be one of t...
- by narccissa - at 2008.12.06 17:56:00
|
3. DPS graphs: BS vs. BC - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rivqua Originally by: SecHaul Calculate the number of damps it will require to bring a 100KM lock range to under 40KM on a non-bonused platform. Here is a hint, 5 damps only reduce it 45%. When bonused ships are requ...
- by narccissa - at 2008.12.03 09:01:00
|
4. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: The Djego Wtf is it this hard to understand the diffrence between Low Sec Small Gang and 0.0 where you could have any support you need at hand if you want to? No, i get it. I am just m...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.28 16:46:00
|
5. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: van Uber Originally by: narccissa We're talking about a mega. If you fit 2 neuts, great your better against BC's. Another BS pilot will **** you in something else quite easily. Not to mention you give up your dps ad...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.25 03:33:00
|
6. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: narccissa on 24/11/2008 02:12:18 Originally by: van Uber Originally by: The Djego Actualy it is 13+ you might be a bit short of actual comabat experience when you come up with questions like this. 22s x 13 = 28...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.24 02:10:00
|
7. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: narccissa on 22/11/2008 22:34:57 Originally by: sdthujfg Edited by: sdthujfg on 21/11/2008 12:15:53 Originally by: narccissa Edited by: narccissa on 21/11/2008 07:04:06 Originally by: sdthujfg Edite...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.22 22:34:00
|
8. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: narccissa on 21/11/2008 07:04:06 Originally by: sdthujfg Edited by: sdthujfg on 21/11/2008 06:56:08 Originally by: narccissa Blasters are dead when you have trouble hitting a BC in a mega. Even Nozh (who sugges...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.21 07:01:00
|
9. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rogerano Originally by: Iog Krugar the reason why laser users have an edge is that they have a longer window of opportunity to kill the frigate while it is in approach. So if Null wasn't pre-nerfed by emo-rage-po...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.21 01:30:00
|
10. Afterburners are overpowered :) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gypsio III Edited by: Gypsio III on 16/11/2008 14:25:39 Akita, you're being wilfully stupid, and you should know better. Either that or I'm being wilfully trolled, in which case I should know better. But there's bee...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.17 02:25:00
|
11. Frigates > Battleships... Work this out... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: MotherMoon Originally by: BiggestT Originally by: MotherMoon god frigates should be better. and cruisers should be better than frigates, and BCs should be better than cruisers. And BAttleships should be bette...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.16 09:00:00
|
12. Siege Battleships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Builder One Originally by: Evelgrivion I think you can rest assured that the post was read. The fact of the matter is that the game already has a strong bias towards the well defended. A tool like this, as proposed,...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.16 08:49:00
|
13. Change to Covert Ops Cloak function Nerfed ? = Podded - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Waxau Not really mate.... The cov ops frigs and force recons both have a bonus to the recloak time. That is mentioned in the ship bonus/description. The blockade runners do not. It would have been helpful for CCP to menti...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.16 04:17:00
|
14. Large Ship Assembly Array has become the X Large Ship Assembly Array - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Praetor Novak Originally by: Mona X Edited by: Mona X on 15/11/2008 17:35:59 How about reading patch notes? Oh how original you idiot troll - go back to Poland and stay off these forums if you can't post const...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.15 19:49:00
|
15. Afterburners are overpowered :) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Roemy Schneider im sure 100km muninns deal "full damage" with snipe ammo Made up by flight time. Flight time reduces effectiveness especially compared to the alpha muninn has instantly after it locks. Sure, turrets don't...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.15 18:51:00
|
16. Disgusted, A SHOUT AGAINST THE NEW PVP SITUATION and a big **** YOU - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Baron Daxus YOU IDIOT. Quantum Rise is the Best thing that has happened to EVE since Premium Graphics. My Harpy can now do a better job soloing a battleship as it can go 2.5KMS orbiting it. just ADAPT and GET OVER IT. BTW ca...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.15 18:21:00
|
17. Afterburners are overpowered :) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gypsio III Quote: Translation : so a 165m base sigcruiser that would do 1300 m/s unwebbed will STILL get a 50% damage reduction AFTER being webbed down by a T2 web, while before it would have taken full damage (heck, ...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.15 17:16:00
|
18. Afterburners are overpowered :) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: narccissa on 15/11/2008 16:54:51 From the graph a 600m/s ab'ing cruiser will still receive only half damages from missiles of the same size. Since when did caldari ships need webs to apply full damage at range? What turret ship ne...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.15 16:54:00
|
19. Crow's Made Useless with Quantum Rise Patch - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Artemis Rose Has it lost the ability to perma-run a MWD and a 24km scrambler? Until it has, I doubt its 100% useless right, the ability to use an mwd and a disruptor. What ship can't fit them... oh right noobships. o/ it...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.12 08:47:00
|
20. The Pro-Quantam Rise Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
the more I think about it. The less I like it. Some people like to emphasize class differences. I don't. Role differences are fine but the idea that Cruisers should compete in web range versus larger ships is pretty stupid. In that way, class is...
- by narccissa - at 2008.11.12 08:34:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |