EVE Search - Who will be left to hate? KenZoku must survive.

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Who will be left to hate? KenZoku must survive.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Teki Caldrum Caldari Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:19:00 - [1] 0.0 is about to become a very boring and lonely place. With these massive power blocks NAPing each other and smashing KenZoku into nothingness, who will be left to hate? In roughly a year, I wouldn't be surprised to see one alliance controlling all of 0.0. Doesn't this alarm anyone?
Terror Rising Minmatar Death Of Fallen Angels	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:20:00 - [2] Didn't Ken / Bob try and do this once and fail anyway? Please resize sig to a maximum file size no greater than 24000 bytes - Mitnal
EvilweaselFinance Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:22:00 - [3] empire pubbies
NokNok Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:23:00 - [4] KIA
MAXSuicide Caldari Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:23:00 - [5] Originally by: Terror Rising Didn't Ken / Bob try and do this once and fail anyway? No, not really.
Teki Caldrum Caldari Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:24:00 - [6] Edited by: Teki Caldrum on 04/05/2009 19:25:13 Originally by: Terror Rising Didn't Ken / Bob try and do this once and fail anyway? No, they made a campaign called "MAX" which wasn't about gaining SOV. It was simply about doing MAXimum Damage. BoB humbly accepted Delve as their home. They had the means to take down more regions, I'm sure. However, unlike GoonSwarm, they liked to keep enemies. Which, in my opinion, is in good sportsmanship. What is the point of NAPing everyone and gaining complete control. There will be minimal conflicts. Major power blocks will dictate if you're even ABLE to live in 0.0. It's unfair monopolization. IMHO, it's going to ruin this aspect of the game.
EvilweaselFinance Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:25:00 - [7] Originally by: Teki Caldrum Originally by: Terror Rising Didn't Ken / Bob try and do this once and fail anyway? No, they made a campaign called "MAX" which wasn't about gaining SOV. It was simply about doing MAXimum Damage. BoB humbly accepted Delve as their home. They had the means to take down more regions, I'm sure. yo they tried you might recall an invasion of teneferis a while ago suddenly they had no regions left but delve
Hey You Amarr Shut Up And Play	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:27:00 - [8] No one will control all of 0.0 evva. Because game mechanics don't allow it without a effort such is like 2 years of shooting poses and everyone gets tired of that way sooner. So doesn't matter what coalition you have nor size of said coalition. It might have been possible in the past and we all know who came closest to actually do it. __________________________________
Temporalis Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:31:00 - [9] Edited by: Temporalis on 04/05/2009 19:32:57 We don't want any more space than Delve/Querious. POS combat sucks and is boring. Saying that one alliance will control 0.0 confirms that you don't know what you are talking about.
Teki Caldrum Caldari Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:31:00 - [10] Originally by: Hey You No one will control all of 0.0 evva. Because game mechanics don't allow it without a effort such is like 2 years of shooting poses and everyone gets tired of that way sooner. So doesn't matter what coalition you have nor size of said coalition. It might have been possible in the past and we all know who came closest to actually do it. Sure it does. Through diplomacy. Sure they may not all carry the same name but it will be one giant coalition. No one will have the balls to leave this coalition and attempt to initiate another conflict. They will be too afraid of the massive NAPfest annihilating them. So, I fear that New Eden is about to go through its "Pax Romanus" era.
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr Guiding Hand Social Club Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:32:00 - [11] Edited by: Tyrrax Thorrk on 04/05/2009 19:36:37 Originally by: Hey You It might have been possible in the past and we all know who came closest to actually do it. goons? Originally by: Teki Caldrum Sure it does. Through diplomacy. Sure they may not all carry the same name but it will be one giant coalition. No one will have the balls to leave this coalition and attempt to initiate another conflict. They will be too afraid of the massive NAPfest annihilating them. So, I fear that New Eden is about to go through its "Pax Romanus" era. Bull ;P if the uniting factor for gooncoalition goes away (kenzoku dying off) they'll break apart into several coalitions again (NC, SPLOT, RSF), they may stay friends but they're unlikely to stay blue, especially SPLOT / NC and SPLOT/goons there'll still be groups like stainwagon hostile to the rest, -A-'s group, CVA's bunch, triumvirate and the north russians.. if you ask me things'll get more interesting if kenny stop being a factor, not less
Flinx Evenstar Minmatar North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:37:00 - [12] Posting in a "sky is falling" thread Hi, my name is Flinx, and I am a recovering nano***
Virum Acuedalla Amarr Phantasmal Collective Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:46:00 - [13] This is what makes Eve such a wonderful game. Invariably after the take over of Delve is complete and things "settle down", you're going to see someone get ambitious. Be it because of disgruntled leadership, new leadership etc. one of the many alliances may try to make a run at the NC, or they tear themselves apart. It may not happen for a while but everyone gets bored some time, and when that happens it will be all out war again. Under new ownership
Teki Caldrum Caldari Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:46:00 - [14] Originally by: Flinx Evenstar Edited by: Flinx Evenstar on 04/05/2009 19:39:16 Posting in a "sky is falling" thread Originally by: Teki Caldrum With these massive power blocks NAPing each other and smashing KenZoku into nothingness, I don't think Kenny will agree with that statement. I wouldn't agree with that statement if I were them, either. It would destroy morale. Only a fool would maintain a defeatist attitude. However, from the outside looking in, KenZoku cannot win a war of attrition. This isn't a conflict of skill.
Helen Amarr DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:56:00 - [15] Originally by: Teki Caldrum This isn't a conflict of skill. where has there been a conflict of skill in eve?
Vladic Ka Minmatar Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:58:00 - [16] Edited by: Vladic Ka on 04/05/2009 19:57:48 Apparently we will be taking on EVE when we are done. Vote Mazzilliu for CSM!
Teki Caldrum Caldari Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS	Posted - 2009.05.04 19:59:00 - [17] Edited by: Teki Caldrum on 04/05/2009 19:59:31 Originally by: Helen Originally by: Teki Caldrum This isn't a conflict of skill. where has there been a conflict of skill in eve? That's actually quite funny. Considering you're a goonie. There haven't been many conflicts your alliance has engaged in which were skill based. Your alliance relies entirely on one tactic, well as of late, two. 1.) Attrition. 2.) Espionage/Manipulation. Why did GoonSwarm need to force BoB to disband before taking Delve? I'm sure none of it had anything to do with skill?
BuIIseye Amarr Pax Amarria Corp	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:00:00 - [18] Originally by: Virum Acuedalla This is what makes Eve such a wonderful game. Invariably after the take over of Delve is complete and things "settle down", you're going to see someone get ambitious. Be it because of disgruntled leadership, new leadership etc. one of the many alliances may try to make a run at the NC, or they tear themselves apart. It may not happen for a while but everyone gets bored some time, and when that happens it will be all out war again. You mean like the time ED/IRC started a new conflict with RA after BoB was disbanded and ended up having some of their assets stolen by goons, atacked by RA, UNL, Rebelion and whatever other alliance from the south and Majesta and the rest of the NC b-teams from the west in a classic 10 alliance vs 3 blob warfare? Yes, i too think EVE will resume its fair non-blob honorable conflics once the things "settle down".
Flinx Evenstar Minmatar North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:01:00 - [19] Edited by: Flinx Evenstar on 04/05/2009 20:01:13 Originally by: Teki Caldrum 2.) Espionage/Manipulation. You do realise that there is far more skill involved in that than waiting a few days to train a skill, then press F1 Hi, my name is Flinx, and I am a recovering nano***
Teki Caldrum Caldari Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:02:00 - [20] Originally by: Flinx Evenstar Edited by: Flinx Evenstar on 04/05/2009 20:01:13 Originally by: Teki Caldrum 2.) Espionage/Manipulation. You do realise that there is far more skill involved in that than waiting a few days to train a skill, then press F1 Are you trying to say that skill in EVE-Online is denoted by how much SP you have? lol.
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr Guiding Hand Social Club Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:03:00 - [21] there's plenty of skill involved in espionage and wars of attrition (not to mention role management, laf) also I don't really agree that kenzoku is dying, yeah they're drastically diminished, as are their pets, but they still have stainwagon and -a- propping them up for now, don't think they'll just roll over and die even if that stops being so kenny's likely to continue being a factor in 0.0 politics for a long time to come
Helen Amarr DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:05:00 - [22] Originally by: Teki Caldrum Edited by: Teki Caldrum on 04/05/2009 19:59:31 Originally by: Helen Originally by: Teki Caldrum This isn't a conflict of skill. where has there been a conflict of skill in eve? That's actually quite funny. Considering you're a goonie. There haven't been many conflicts your alliance has engaged in which were skill based. Your alliance relies entirely on one tactic, well as of late, two. 1.) Attrition. 2.) Espionage/Manipulation. Why did GoonSwarm need to force BoB to disband before taking Delve? I'm sure none of it had anything to do with skill? you not going to answer me then? when has there been a conflict of skill in eve? (don't include 1v1's)
Flinx Evenstar Minmatar North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:06:00 - [23] Originally by: Teki Caldrum Are you trying to say that skill in EVE-Online is denoted by how much SP you have? lol. No, that's what you are implying. I am pointing out that social engineering requires genuine skills. But I'll accept your argument that the skilless blobbers are winning, and the skillful blobbers are losing Hi, my name is Flinx, and I am a recovering nano***
Snowden Vel Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:08:00 - [24] Originally by: Teki Caldrum 1.) Attrition. Please take a moment and explain how attrition is not a part of every war.
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr Guiding Hand Social Club Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:08:00 - [25] Originally by: Helen you not going to answer me then? when has there been a conflict of skill in eve? (don't include 1v1's) Really stupid questions don't deserve answers. PS; you suck at screenshots
Katsura Kotonoha Caldari Igneus Auctorita GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:10:00 - [26] attrition takes skill
Brobuck Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:12:00 - [27] Originally by: Teki Caldrum So, I fear that New Eden is about to go through its "Pax Romanus" era. As soon as kengoku (anime is cartoons) is dead, I'm coming to empire to kill you.
Teki Caldrum Caldari Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:19:00 - [28] Edited by: Teki Caldrum on 04/05/2009 20:19:43 Originally by: Snowden Vel Originally by: Teki Caldrum 1.) Attrition. Please take a moment and explain how attrition is not a part of every war. Well, lets first look at what Attrition Warfare is. Attrition Warfare is: Attrition Warfare is a tactic in which one party in a conflict attempts to wear down the other through use of superior forces in NUMBER. Meaning Quantity. This will also help you understand: Most military theorists[who?] and strategics like Sun Tzu have viewed attrition warfare as something to be avoided. In the sense that attrition warfare represents an attempt to grind down an opponent through superior numbers, it represents the opposite of the usual principles of war, where one attempts to achieve decisive victories through manoeuvre, concentration of force, surprise, and the like. On the other hand, a side which perceives itself to be at a marked disadvantage in manoeuvre warfare or unit tactics may deliberately seek out attrition warfare to neutralize its opponent's advantages.
Ice Fist Amarr Internal Anarchy	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:19:00 - [29] From what i've been hearing on my adventures playing internetz spaceshipz, I find more people who hate goons than bob/ken. I've always thought goons were cute and cuddly and just want someone to give them a hug.
Himo Amasacia Minmatar Ultrapolite Socialites GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.04 20:21:00 - [30] This is a straw. Yes, grasp harder. "Constant practice devoted to one subject often outdoes both intelligence and skill." -Cicero

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.