| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Count Austheim
Raven's Flight
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 22:46:00 -
[61] - Quote
You need many people to make a game. |

Mendolus
Aurelius Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 22:50:00 -
[62] - Quote
RougeOperator wrote:Mendolus wrote:RougeOperator wrote: What is your point exactly?
This is a video game, not the Lament of the Proletariat. Thanks for pointing out to everyone reading the forums that you are extremely ignorant. Its not just a game. Its also a payed for service. One the involves an investment of time and money. This is not some scrabble game you toss in the closet and pull out only once a year for a family gathering. Its not some 20 hour game you got for xbox that once its over its over. Its an MMO which is a totally different thing then just a game. For many many reasons. And customer/player/user feedback matters. As each person has formed relationships in game and out that can and will effect sales and retention of past and future customers.
I never said it wasn't, I was just pointing out that you seem to be thumping your pulpit considerably harder than is really necessary, esp. with the whole silencing discontent and brainwashing nonsense.
Do you really think rhetoric like that is necessary? I mean, you have really lost touch that bad with reality?
...clearly the Ishukone Watch Scorpion is the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, i.e. the Brown Rider, otherwise known as Poopie. |

Mendolus
Aurelius Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 23:03:00 -
[63] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote: There are gradiations of protest. Measured demonstration of discontent. This community is old enough and sophisticated enough to see through the manipulative rhetoric of counterrevolutionary agents such as yourself!
Exactly, and I think many of you have long since crossed the line from reasonable discussion into mob mentality.
Make a list of your demands, and we will see which side you are on, no?
Hint: Anything that involves things we clearly know CCP will never do in any way, shape, or form, regardless of whether they should or ought to from a subscriber viewpoint but NOT a business viewpoint puts you on the mob side.
CCP are not subscribers, they are producers. They are not obligated to consider your feelings when they make a product, only whether money will leave your wallet when they dangle it in front of you.
Mobs make irrational demands that can obviously not be met.
Things like:
Remove Incarna! Quit ALL WiS development forever! Trash WoD and DUST! Do as I and I alone say because I must know best! etc. ...clearly the Ishukone Watch Scorpion is the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, i.e. the Brown Rider, otherwise known as Poopie. |

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 23:10:00 -
[64] - Quote
Mendolus wrote: They are not obligated to consider your feelings when they make a product,
You need to stop posting. Just with this line alone.
Also you are the one coming off as a ranting mad man on a soapbox at this point.
|

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
236
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 23:15:00 -
[65] - Quote
Mendolus wrote: Exactly, and I think many of you have long since crossed the line from reasonable discussion into mob mentality. Make a list of your demands, and we will see which side you are on, no?
I think you are being quite dishonest to portray the grand majority of players troubled with CCP's recent business and development decisions in this way. "Mob-mentality?" Should I be refering to you as a puling collaborator or witless quisling? Such language gets in the way of discussion and draws battle-lines - but is that what you are attempting to do?
Quote:Hint: Anything that involves things we clearly know CCP will never do in any way, shape, or form, regardless of whether they should or ought to from a subscriber viewpoint but NOT a business viewpoint puts you on the mob side.
Who is calling for such really?
Quote:CCP are not subscribers, they are producers. They are not obligated to consider your feelings when they make a product, only whether money will leave your wallet when they dangle it in front of you. Mobs make irrational demands that can obviously not be met.
Can I ask what your interest is in portraying members of this community in such a negative cash-cow role? I refute your argument with reference to the CSM. If all was as you surmise then what exactly is the CSM for and why was it set up in the first place.
Quote:Things like: Remove Incarna! Quit ALL WiS development forever! Trash WoD and DUST! Do as I and I alone say because I must know best! etc.
I am not calling for the removal of Incarna and I honestly don't know of anyone who has seriously called for this on these forums. Similarly I don't believe people are calling for the end of all Incarna development forever. Dito for WoD and Dust.
These are obvious strawman statements that reveal you as a dishonest debater and this leaves me wondering if you are simply trolling here or have some other bizarre agenda. Either which way I have to tell you that you aren't really achieving much.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. |

Fawcks
Avoid and Evade Epsilon Shimmy Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 23:21:00 -
[66] - Quote
Someone summarize this thread for me in a small paragraph or less? I'm just lazy and I don't feel like going through all 4 pages to get to the meat of the discussion. |

Mendolus
Aurelius Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 23:30:00 -
[67] - Quote
RougeOperator wrote:Mendolus wrote: They are not obligated to consider your feelings when they make a product,
You need to stop posting. Just with this line alone. Also you are the one coming off as a ranting mad man on a soapbox at this point.
Rouge, it is alright to back off the tone of your rhetoric, I am not going to use it against you if you do or chest beat, I will simply better enjoy having a more rational discussion with you over the topic at hand.
But phrases like silencing discontent and brainwashing are really not very constructive on a video game forum.
And I am sorry, but CCP is a company, not a nursery, they are here to make a profit first, not improve the quality of your life experiences or help you achieve inner peace.
Do they and most of their employees care whether you are having fun or not? Of course they do. But at the end of the day, they have mouths to feed, whether their own, or others, and I'm sorry, but if I had to choose between your feelings and my dinner, I would choose the latter every time. ...clearly the Ishukone Watch Scorpion is the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, i.e. the Brown Rider, otherwise known as Poopie. |

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 23:42:00 -
[68] - Quote
Mendolus wrote:RougeOperator wrote:Mendolus wrote: They are not obligated to consider your feelings when they make a product,
You need to stop posting. Just with this line alone. Also you are the one coming off as a ranting mad man on a soapbox at this point. Rouge, it is alright to back off the tone of your rhetoric, I am not going to use it against you if you do or chest beat, I will simply better enjoy having a more rational discussion with you over the topic at hand. But phrases like silencing discontent and brainwashing are really not very constructive on a video game forum. And I am sorry, but CCP is a company, not a nursery, they are here to make a profit first, not improve the quality of your life experiences or help you achieve inner peace. Do they and most of their employees care whether you are having fun or not? Of course they do. But at the end of the day, they have mouths to feed, whether their own, or others, and I'm sorry, but if I had to choose between your feelings and my dinner, I would choose the latter every time.
They are very constructive if they are describing the actions I am talking about. |

Mendolus
Aurelius Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 23:44:00 -
[69] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:...
You are taking what I mean out of context, so this ends here.
And honestly, I do not really care, I was just curious to see if you could surprise me with something... expansive.
You did not.
Edit: And by the way, I did not say feelings do not matter, nor whether CCP should solely be concerned with selling snake oil and not with whether it works or not, I said that they are here to sell a product, that product is designed to give you all manner of feelings of goodiness, but the product must make a profit, even if not all of you get the same amount of goodiness as others.
Evidently CCP is under the impression that their current development path will result in the same or more profit than before, and this relatively small sampling of forum goers says next to nothing about whether or not they are actually achieving that end.
Now logon metrics and subscription numbers both current and projected are another matter, which of course, involves feelings of goodiness in the product over time.
Sure, voice your discontent, but be careful you do not raise your voices so loudly that you do more damage than you are trying to avert in the first place.
You can be your own worst enemy very easily if you really want to be, doesn't take nearly as much as you'd think. ...clearly the Ishukone Watch Scorpion is the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, i.e. the Brown Rider, otherwise known as Poopie. |

Sin Easts
56
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 06:23:00 -
[70] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Yeah thats a dodgy argument that doesn't really refute anything people have gotten annoyed about.
CCP has one current income stream and thats Eve Online. Any resources raised by Eve and spent on other projects represents resource taken from Eve. Doesn't really matter if they are Dust devs or WOD devs they are paid-for-by-eve Devs.
So I wouldn't really go making triumphant threads about this stuff.
However that is how companies work - you reinvest profits in expanding your products protofilo in order to make more profit. EvE players calling CCP out for developing other projects than EvE with "EvE money" is about the same as Mac users bashing Apple for developing iPods and not further enhancing their trusty computers - possible, but rather silly. |

Trolls Troll
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 06:39:00 -
[71] - Quote
Still fanboing for CCP Deni? Still fighting the good fight, trying to convince anyone that speaking about something other than your own opinion couldn't possibly be right?
What you fail to realise (once again), is that no-one would have a problem on WOD or DUST or even Incarna being created if Eve FiS had sufficient developer time. These projects are taking away resources that could have been spent on Eve, and instead Eve is being neglected in favour of these projects.
Learn2business, you don't neglect your primary customer base to develop new cool hip things.
Unless your Apple ofc. |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 06:55:00 -
[72] - Quote
Denidil wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Yeah thats a dodgy argument that doesn't really refute anything people have gotten annoyed about.
CCP has one current income stream and thats Eve Online. Any resources raised by Eve and spent on other projects represents resource taken from Eve. Doesn't really matter if they are Dust devs or WOD devs they are paid-for-by-eve Devs.
So I wouldn't really go making triumphant threads about this stuff.
you really don't know jackshit about business, do you?
You're a scrub that knows "jackshit" about how CCP operate. Your gushing fanboi posts are ample proof of that.
In a year's time (if you're still here which I doubt) you will look back on the drivel you spew out and cringe. |

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
233
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 07:32:00 -
[73] - Quote
Fawcks wrote:Someone summarize this thread for me in a small paragraph or less? I'm just lazy and I don't feel like going through all 4 pages to get to the meat of the discussion.
Some people think that all of the profits from Eve should go into developing Eve.
Some people think that all of th profits from Eve should go into developing other games.
Draw a line between between those two viewpoints.
Most people sit somewhere along that line, and are arguing that their's is the best spot.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |

Psyrelle
Coalition Of Gentlemen.
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 07:50:00 -
[74] - Quote
Rodj Blake wrote:Fawcks wrote:Someone summarize this thread for me in a small paragraph or less? I'm just lazy and I don't feel like going through all 4 pages to get to the meat of the discussion. Some people think that all of the profits from Eve should go into developing Eve. Some people think that Quote:all of th profits from Eve should go into developing other games. some of the profits should also go into devolping other games Draw a line between between those two viewpoints. Most people sit somewhere along that line, and are arguing that their's is the best spot.
better to read the intire thread again before posting concrete stuff. |

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 11:12:00 -
[75] - Quote
Rodj Blake wrote:Fawcks wrote:Someone summarize this thread for me in a small paragraph or less? I'm just lazy and I don't feel like going through all 4 pages to get to the meat of the discussion. Some people think that all of the profits from Eve should go into developing Eve. Some people think that all of th profits from Eve should go into developing other games. Draw a line between between those two viewpoints. Most people sit somewhere along that line, and are arguing that their's is the best spot.
More like
Some people think the profits from EvE should only be spent after they reinvest in the core product that is EvE. The basic Idea is that there is a minimum overhead of resources that should be given to EvE from our subscriptions that must be met before they reallocate resources to other games and new venture products.
What CCP did was put way less then the minimum required in terms of resources needed into the core product for YEARS at this point. In an attempt to front load new projects at the expense of the core existing product. Which seems to have lead to a corporate culture of viewing the customers not as customers but as little more then slaves on the plantation that should be happy to work for their masters. I'm looking at you Hilmar.
The insult on top of it all is when we finally get the big expansion they put so much on hold for years and when we get incarna its buggy as all get out, melts computers, and takes away from the gameplay experience in many ways. While adding nothing new to the core mechanics and content. Not to mention the insult that was the NEX store and its pricing. Im not sure if the NEX is madness or stupidity at this point honestly. The best thing was the new turret animations, but then botched that with turd icons. CCP created a textbook example for other companies on, "how not to introduce a cash shop". I hope other developers take note.
No one is saying they should not use our money to develop new games or projects. But before they do that they need to meet the minimum investment back into the game we pay for. Something that they have so far failed at to be honest. That is what the people angrey at CCP are saying.
The other Pro CCP side is only interested in putting words into dissenters mouths and creating straw men and acting like Saul Alinksy's. Rather then have a legitimate discourse on the matter. Though there are a few that are not just blowing smoke they and have valid points they get drowned out in a sea of CCP sycophants and brown shirt thugs. Whose basic argument seems to be that they can do whatever they want and you should just shut up and take it. |

Merdaneth
Defensores Fidei Curatores Veritatis Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 12:28:00 -
[76] - Quote
AFKCloaked AltSpy wrote: Just stating the obvious.
Imagine If I sent an email to the Board of directors @ Intel and told them how to develop processors because I bought one.
I want eve to be developed by professional developers, and managed by professional managers. Feedback from their customer base is important on game content, feedback from their customer base on management of the company is a waste of time.
I think you don't understand MMO's. They are different from something like processor because MMO's derive a large part of their value from the time investment of their customers. EVE is fun because we are investing time to play it. Processors don't get better or worse to anyone if you invest a lot of time in them as a customer.
Because EVE players have invested a lot of time in EVE it represents some thing of value beyond just the money they've paid with it. If a company causes the player investments to become worthless, then they will either have to write off those investements or convince management to change course.
If you invested two years of your time to become a Photoshop expert, and Adobe spent all most their money on other software, slowly making your investment worthless, then yes, you most likely *would* be pretty pissed off.
|

DarkAegix
Acetech Systems
36
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 13:17:00 -
[77] - Quote
Some people on this forum aren't familiar with the disadvantages of having all your eggs in one basket... Here's an EVE analogy: You're solo-roaming in your completely officer-fit Drake, kicking piratical butt. Other ships don't stand a chance, as your uber-fit tears them to pieces. You have 0 ISK in wallet, and no assets in station. Who needs those, anyway? Surely you could never lose your Drake! Wrong. You're blobbed by sixteen billion Dramiels and a Falcon, and lose everything. Back to square one. Enjoy your default insurance, and try to scrape your way back to the top. If only you had flown around in a T2 fit Drake, keeping billions of ISK safe in the form of station assets and cold, hard ISK.
And that is precisely why CCP are developing other games. |

AFKCloaked AltSpy
MasterMined Technologies
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 13:48:00 -
[78] - Quote
Merdaneth wrote:AFKCloaked AltSpy wrote: Just stating the obvious.
Imagine If I sent an email to the Board of directors @ Intel and told them how to develop processors because I bought one.
I want eve to be developed by professional developers, and managed by professional managers. Feedback from their customer base is important on game content, feedback from their customer base on management of the company is a waste of time.
I think you don't understand MMO's. They are different from something like processor because MMO's derive a large part of their value from the time investment of their customers. EVE is fun because we are investing time to play it. Processors don't get better or worse to anyone if you invest a lot of time in them as a customer. Because EVE players have invested a lot of time in EVE it represents some thing of value beyond just the money they've paid with it. If a company causes the player investments to become worthless, then they will either have to write off those investements or convince management to change course. If you invested two years of your time to become a Photoshop expert, and Adobe spent all most their money on other software, slowly making your investment worthless, then yes, you most likely *would* be pretty pissed off. If i bought photoshop, my investment would be paid in full. The software would be on my PC, I would have what I paid for, and Adobe would owe me exactly **** all.
When you pay for your EvE subscription, you pay for access to the server. Your investment of time is completely independent of your investment of money. The "value" that you get from the monetary investment is access to the server. The "value" that you get from your time investment is unambiguously subjective.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
168
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 14:05:00 -
[79] - Quote
RougeOperator wrote:More like [truth] Very much like that.
Unless you are completely blind, it is obvious that EVE has not been severely down-prioritised over the last couple of years. A company of 600 people developing 3 games gives us very simply maths to figure out how much resources should go into each game in order for one not to be sacrificed to serve the others.
The example in the OP is that Apoc had drawn devs away from other projects and into EVE. The detail that is being missed here is that when Apoc was released, the company was about half the size it is today. So let's say Gàö of the resources went into EVE rather than the Gàô you'd expectGǪ that's 200ppl minus overhead. Fast-forward to today when the company is 600 heads strong, and let's assume that they are, indeed, giving all games equal attention GÇö that Gàô of the resources are still going into EVE. That means the game should now haveGǪ 200ppl minus overhead working on it. And yet, nothing even remotely approaching the scope of Apoc has happned.
So only sane conclusion here is that, either they have only increased the headcount by adding overhead, or they are, indeed, not giving EVE the attention it gives the other games. I suppose it could be argued that, no, EVE has not had any resources diverted away from it GÇö it still has the 100ppl strong crew it had three years agoGǪ never mind that the other two then would have teams that are more than twice as large. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

AFKCloaked AltSpy
MasterMined Technologies
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 14:10:00 -
[80] - Quote
You have all the variables then?
Lets see them. |

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 14:29:00 -
[81] - Quote
AFKCloaked AltSpy wrote:You have all the variables then? Lets see them.
You will never get them cause CCP would then show that they have indeed miss allocated resources.
Heck seems they are trying to bury info especially with the cancellation of the annual reports to a yearly report. Shortly after the Incarna boondoggle.
|

AFKCloaked AltSpy
MasterMined Technologies
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 14:39:00 -
[82] - Quote
RougeOperator wrote:AFKCloaked AltSpy wrote:You have all the variables then? Lets see them. You will never get them cause CCP would then show that they have indeed miss allocated resources. Heck seems they are trying to bury info especially with the cancellation of the annual reports to a yearly report. Shortly after the Incarna boondoggle.
Right. Which takes the argument from "simple maths" to "complex assumptions". Which is my point.
|

Astir Zekor
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 14:48:00 -
[83] - Quote
Heh, truth is eve is neglected and will be so in forseable future.
Consider few things: - what level of changes, and with what quality they were released - considering earlier consider starting quality of wod and dust and "amount of flesh on those bare bones" - considering earlier consider amount of emergency fixes, patches, redesigning to make those two projects enjoyable .. emm passable - considering earlier consider how much dev power eve can get and when
Just my little train of though that combined with Nex made me go bye bye on subscription (i find this forums more fun than actual game and hang in here till the sub run off). |

Ris Dnalor
Fleet of Doom Ushra'Khan
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 15:01:00 -
[84] - Quote
Denidil wrote:CCP Fallout wrote:Baralosus wrote:Eve development resources have been shifted to focus on Dust514 and World of Darkness. What you are seeing is a slowed down progress because of this. If CCP is able to afford hiring more people to work in the art development aspect, then I'm sure they would be doing that right now. I believe that they cannot afford expanding their staff when they have too much development resources tied up with other games (that which is not currently generating any revenue) and an old game (Eve) that is starting to show signs of age, and possible decline.
But I'm all for putting in more development for Eve. I could care less how they do it as long as they find something that works. I respectfully point out that you are wrong, sir, and ask that you not listen to skuttlbutt. We do not move EVE devs out of EVE. In fact, when we did Apocrypha, staff from WoD and DUST were moved to EVE. These kinds of things happen quite often, where we may borrow resources from WoD or DUST and use them in EVE. Additionally, we are a company of 600 people, of which, we have quite a number of resources working on EVE. thought this should be pointed out more widely. thanks for the info Fallout! original post https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=11056&find=unread
You can say what you will, but the money to pay for all the devs currently comes from eve, so eve resources are being spent elsewhere. Perhaps in the future eve may benefit from dustwad resources, but for now that's not the case. BUT... spin on to your hearts content!
|

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 15:50:00 -
[85] - Quote
AFKCloaked AltSpy wrote:RougeOperator wrote:AFKCloaked AltSpy wrote:You have all the variables then? Lets see them. You will never get them cause CCP would then show that they have indeed miss allocated resources. Heck seems they are trying to bury info especially with the cancellation of the annual reports to a yearly report. Shortly after the Incarna boondoggle. Right. Which takes the argument from "simple maths" to "complex assumptions". Which is my point.
Assumption is not a dirty word, much to the contrary of how you are trying to present it.
The assumption being made based on current evidence that we have access to has turned up with the most likely correct assumption. You can make correct and logical assumptions without simple maths.
Which will also most likely be proven true if we had access to the actual resource allocation information on projects and as to who and what is being worked on.
Its a safe assumption that they have not put the minimum necessary needed resources into the flagship product. As others have already pointed out they have expanded staff and yet none of that expansion was allocated to EvE but to the new projects alone. And they pulled staff over the years from EvE to work on other projects. Or worse yet pretend the incrana team is working on eve when its actually WoD masquerading Incarna as true EvE content. When its clear its an Alpha test for another game at our expense.
So again Incarna is being worked on by WoD staff. They are not the actual EvE staff but Staff abusing the other product as some kind of alpha test and abusing the paying customers that want to play EvE. Which is utter rubbish from most any way you look at it. They made the game we pay for worse off to test tech for another game. Most of us are not fooled by what they are doing.
There is no fungibility in what they are doing here with the resources at their disposal.
Ill add that they technically actually do owe the paying EvE customers at this point. CCP has created a DEBT they owe the EvE community due to the lack of content and game play we have been paying for without much to show for it. |

AFKCloaked AltSpy
MasterMined Technologies
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 15:58:00 -
[86] - Quote
Quote:Assumption is not a dirty word, much to the contrary of how you are trying to present it.
No no no no no no no no no no NO.
Assumption is what everybody has to work with when they don't have all the variables.
I have to assume also.
But as I said, that changes the entire scenario. When everybody is assuming it is 100% opinion at that point. Its not a simple equation.
for example;
Quote: There is no fungibility in what they are doing here with the resources at their disposal.
You have no idea what resources they have at their disposal, or when or where they were allocated. You have a general idea of how many employees work there. |

RougeOperator
Autocannons Anonymous
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 16:06:00 -
[87] - Quote
AFKCloaked AltSpy wrote:Quote:Assumption is not a dirty word, much to the contrary of how you are trying to present it. No no no no no no no no no no NO. Assumption is what everybody has to work with when they don't have all the variables. I have to assume also. But as I said, that changes the entire scenario. When everybody is assuming it is 100% opinion at that point. Its not a simple equation. for example; Quote: There is no fungibility in what they are doing here with the resources at their disposal.
You have no idea what resources they have at their disposal, or when or where they were allocated. You have a general idea of how many employees work there.
Too bad then that the assumptions we are making have a prepoderence of fact backing them up.
Not having the specific hard data on the time clock of employees is not needed when we have enough evidence laying about that backs up the mismanagement of resources.
Or were you not around during the protests? Where streams of information were collected. And posted on many blogs?
I have to say you are just being willfully obtuse about all this. |

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 16:30:00 -
[88] - Quote
I know it's popular to think that EVE is financing WoD and DUST514. But the fact of the matter is that these games are likely being financed through debt, and not through EVE subscriptions. Hence the reason why there was talk in MD about how CCP is going to deal with a loan payment due in October.
Of course people are too busy saying "woe is me" and too attached to the idea that CCP's sole purpose in life is to screw over their customers to understand how business projects are financed. |

AFKCloaked AltSpy
MasterMined Technologies
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 16:32:00 -
[89] - Quote
RougeOperator wrote:AFKCloaked AltSpy wrote:Quote:Assumption is not a dirty word, much to the contrary of how you are trying to present it. No no no no no no no no no no NO. Assumption is what everybody has to work with when they don't have all the variables. I have to assume also. But as I said, that changes the entire scenario. When everybody is assuming it is 100% opinion at that point. Its not a simple equation. for example; Quote: There is no fungibility in what they are doing here with the resources at their disposal.
You have no idea what resources they have at their disposal, or when or where they were allocated. You have a general idea of how many employees work there. Too bad then that the assumptions we are making have a prepoderence of fact backing them up. Not having the specific hard data on the time clock of employees is not needed when we have enough evidence laying about that backs up the mismanagement of resources. Or were you not around during the protests? Where streams of information were collected. And posted on many blogs? I have to say you are just being willfully obtuse about all this.
1. If you have some of the information, you still have to assume. 2. You didn't post any of the evidence you are talking about in this thread, so saying it is backed up with the preponderance of fact is a fallacy.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
198
|
Posted - 2011.09.17 16:34:00 -
[90] - Quote
AFKCloaked AltSpy wrote:Right. Which takes the argument from "simple maths" to "complex assumptions". Which is my point.
No, it doesn't.
600 employees, three games vs. 300 employees working on three games. The only assumption was that when they focused on Apoc, they shifted Gàö of the resources over to EVE. The simple maths is this: Gàô of f(600) = Gàö of f(300), where f(x) simply means "minus overhead".
In fact, the math is not just simple, but na+»ve GÇö the relative overhead for 600 will normally be lower than for 300, and the whole thing doesn't even include stuff that benefits all three games at once, so really, it's Gàô of f(600) GëÑ Gàö of f(300), and yet, those 300 managed to do more than the 600 have done. So either they have huge issues with their overhead, or they are, indeed, not putting a fair share of the resources into EVE. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |