Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 61 post(s) |

IamBeastx
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:41:00 -
[361] - Quote
Intigo wrote:
It's a good thing that CCP clarified that joining the same corp was not allowed, but practicing together is.
The fact that the rule is so vague is the very reason that CVA & 4th were confused. They had considered doing the very same thing before HYDRA & Outbreak were banned.
Do you think Sreegs would have instantly banned their teams too?
Don't confuse my posts with anything other than replies related to previous tournies, go back a bit further and you'll see i do not agree with the complete ban, even the rules previously posted don't mention A-Teams being banned for having b,c, etc teams
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:43:00 -
[362] - Quote
IamBeastx wrote:Intigo wrote:
It's a good thing that CCP clarified that joining the same corp was not allowed, but practicing together is.
The fact that the rule is so vague is the very reason that CVA & 4th were confused. They had considered doing the very same thing before HYDRA & Outbreak were banned.
Do you think Sreegs would have instantly banned their teams too?
Don't confuse my posts with anything other than replies related to previous tournies, go back a bit further and you'll see i do not agree with the complete ban, even the rules previously posted don't mention A-Teams being banned for having b,c, etc teams
We did mention it somewhere it just really isn't worth my time digging it up for people who won't be participating in this year's alliance tournament. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

iLLeLogicaL
The Red Circle Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:44:00 -
[363] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:IamBeastx wrote:Intigo wrote:
It's a good thing that CCP clarified that joining the same corp was not allowed, but practicing together is.
The fact that the rule is so vague is the very reason that CVA & 4th were confused. They had considered doing the very same thing before HYDRA & Outbreak were banned.
Do you think Sreegs would have instantly banned their teams too?
Don't confuse my posts with anything other than replies related to previous tournies, go back a bit further and you'll see i do not agree with the complete ban, even the rules previously posted don't mention A-Teams being banned for having b,c, etc teams We did mention it somewhere it just really isn't worth my time digging it up for people who won't be participating in this year's alliance tournament. And that's the precise reason why you should step out and let someone above you handle this. |

Hathrul
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
90
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:44:00 -
[364] - Quote
Bubanni wrote:Sreeg you are really really bad at talking to the playerbase... you should find someone else to do it for you... you are acting like Hilmar did before he had to say sorry to everyone.
ive never seen someone so directly communicating with the player base.....id say hes doing the best damn job of all ccp |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:46:00 -
[365] - Quote
iLLeLogicaL wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:IamBeastx wrote:Intigo wrote:
It's a good thing that CCP clarified that joining the same corp was not allowed, but practicing together is.
The fact that the rule is so vague is the very reason that CVA & 4th were confused. They had considered doing the very same thing before HYDRA & Outbreak were banned.
Do you think Sreegs would have instantly banned their teams too?
Don't confuse my posts with anything other than replies related to previous tournies, go back a bit further and you'll see i do not agree with the complete ban, even the rules previously posted don't mention A-Teams being banned for having b,c, etc teams We did mention it somewhere it just really isn't worth my time digging it up for people who won't be participating in this year's alliance tournament. And that's the precise reason why you should step out and let someone above you handle this.
ok
:edit: haha j/k I'm still here "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Duncan Tanner
Genos Occidere
223
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:51:00 -
[366] - Quote
It's alright Sreegs, it's clear that trying to come to a resolution that allowed the defending champions to participate was never a priority for you.
Maintaining a high level of competitiveness for the tournament was never a priority for you.
Dealing with the situation professionally was never a priority for you.
We've wanted to believe that this was a misunderstanding on your end so we tried to post clarification and come to a resolution.
We were wrong however, the misunderstanding is on our end. You never intended for us to participate in the tournament to begin with. If you had you would've talked to us as you talked to others before taking action.
We've come to accept this now.
Enjoy your tournament. - |

Suleiman Shouaa
The Tuskers
71
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:52:00 -
[367] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Suleiman Shouaa wrote:CCP still mad due to AT IX Final (despite the semi-finals being better than most finals). CCP staff who are dedicated to the AT chose not to respond to Hydra's emails, despite responding to other emails from other teams. CCP bans 0utbreak/Genos, despite them having all the time in the world to tell them to knock it off if they actually wanted them in the tournament (ie. greater good for all the viewers). CCP starts deleting posts on forums related to this
:shocker: If you're going to post a timeline insert facts. Don't misrepresent me or the team purposely. That doesn't look like a request because it isn't.
The first point could be false, however the following still stands:
0utbreak, Hydra etc. sent emails to that email address with queries about the Alliance Tournament. At this point, two things happened:
i) You read those emails and thought about what to do with them OR ii) You didn't read them.
Since other teams have revealed that they've sent in their own queries and that they've been answered, it's pretty clear that those emails have been read and that you deliberately chose not to respond to 0utbreak/Hydra's queries.
By refusing to communicate with them, you knew that they would continue along this road and that you would have to ban them from the tournament.
If your primary concern was to make this tournament as good as possible, you would want them in the tournament. Why? They are in the highest "tier" of tournament teams - they have ISK, they have experience, they have skillpoints and they have teamwork. Most teams only have 1-2, some with 3. Not many have all 4.
But, you didn't want them in the tournament. Your feelings regarding last year's final ruled supreme over your desire to make this the best alliance tournament ever.
Do I think you shouldn't host the AT? No, you obviously have a passion for it otherwise you wouldn't be replying about it on a Saturday afternoon when I presume you're off the clock. And the improvements to ship points/team sizes etc. should shake it up quite nicely, with more gank orientated setups which are more fun to watch than the logi orientated setups.
Just admit that you had a lapse of judgement and for the greater good will allow them to submit a joint team and most of this will go away.
As for deleting posts? Compare and contrast https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=113748 with http://eve-search.com/thread/113748-1. |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:53:00 -
[368] - Quote
Duncan Tanner wrote:It's alright Sreegs, it's clear that trying to come to a resolution that allowed the defending champions to participate was never a priority for you.
Maintaining a high level of competitiveness for the tournament was never a priority for you.
Dealing with the situation professionally was never a priority for you.
We've wanted to believe that this was a misunderstanding on your end so we tried to post clarification and come to a resolution.
We were wrong however, the misunderstanding is on our end. You never intended for us to participate in the tournament to begin with. If you had you would've talked to us as you talked to others before taking action.
We've come to accept this now.
Enjoy your tournament.
Everyone will thanks! "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Kalvunia IV
Born-2-Kill
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:53:00 -
[369] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:iLLeLogicaL wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:IamBeastx wrote:Intigo wrote:
It's a good thing that CCP clarified that joining the same corp was not allowed, but practicing together is.
The fact that the rule is so vague is the very reason that CVA & 4th were confused. They had considered doing the very same thing before HYDRA & Outbreak were banned.
Do you think Sreegs would have instantly banned their teams too?
Don't confuse my posts with anything other than replies related to previous tournies, go back a bit further and you'll see i do not agree with the complete ban, even the rules previously posted don't mention A-Teams being banned for having b,c, etc teams We did mention it somewhere it just really isn't worth my time digging it up for people who won't be participating in this year's alliance tournament. And that's the precise reason why you should step out and let someone above you handle this. ok :edit: haha j/k I'm still here
As some one who is representing CCP publicly on this forum you should act more professional in my honest opinion. |

carbomb
Super Team Munkey
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:55:00 -
[370] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:[
None of those teams had a history of cheating using the exact same methods they were using again this year. Were we not to have to enforce these new rules a conversation with PL or RvB wouldn't have been necessary because those teams would have been in.
I hope this helps but it probably won't.
I'm Sorry, where did it say that what happend in AT9 was against the rules? No rules were broken! therefore they can not be regarded as "cheats" for it.
What would probably end all this posting is an admission from sreegs and co that basically this is them hitting back at last years finalists out of spite. You outmetagamed the metagamers and fair play ccp, you did it well. Just admit that this is payback and this matter will be closed. Its pretty pathetic how you are behaving. Most people can see that this was your attempt at revenge. You really are a bunch of kids at times. You made mistakes, you tried cover them up. admit your wrong doings and move along. By the way, If one of my employee's spoke to my customers the way you do to yours you would be out on your ear! Show some professionalism, man.
also love how you hung the Senior GM who responded to Hydra/0utbreak out to dry to cover you behinds. Smooth! |
|

ElextriX
Snuff Box
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:56:00 -
[371] - Quote
Hathrul wrote:Bubanni wrote:Sreeg you are really really bad at talking to the playerbase... you should find someone else to do it for you... you are acting like Hilmar did before he had to say sorry to everyone. ive never seen someone so directly communicating with the player base.....id say hes doing the best damn job of all ccp
By treating paying customers in a rude, arrogant and obnoxious manner? The lack of professionalism in his responses is frankly shocking. |

iLLeLogicaL
The Red Circle Inc.
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:57:00 -
[372] - Quote
Even a simpleton can easily why they went off together for the sake of convenience. And if you're a bit serious about winning, like Hydra & outbreak are. You go practice in a wormhole.
They only need 1 corp. They can train against worthy adversaries. Fleet finder is a nifty handy tool when you can just tick "corporation".
And there's this super awesome feature introduced (after being pushed by an elected official of the playerbase, TwoStep) called Corporation Bookmarks.
As wormhole dwelling resident, I can tell you this one was a lifechanger. |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:57:00 -
[373] - Quote
Suleiman Shouaa wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Suleiman Shouaa wrote:CCP still mad due to AT IX Final (despite the semi-finals being better than most finals). CCP staff who are dedicated to the AT chose not to respond to Hydra's emails, despite responding to other emails from other teams. CCP bans 0utbreak/Genos, despite them having all the time in the world to tell them to knock it off if they actually wanted them in the tournament (ie. greater good for all the viewers). CCP starts deleting posts on forums related to this
:shocker: If you're going to post a timeline insert facts. Don't misrepresent me or the team purposely. That doesn't look like a request because it isn't. The first point could be false, however the following still stands: 0utbreak, Hydra etc. sent emails to that email address with queries about the Alliance Tournament. At this point, two things happened: i) You read those emails and thought about what to do with them OR ii) You didn't read them. Since other teams have revealed that they've sent in their own queries and that they've been answered, it's pretty clear that those emails have been read and that you deliberately chose not to respond to 0utbreak/Hydra's queries. By refusing to communicate with them, you knew that they would continue along this road and that you would have to ban them from the tournament. If your primary concern was to make this tournament as good as possible, you would want them in the tournament. Why? They are in the highest "tier" of tournament teams - they have ISK, they have experience, they have skillpoints and they have teamwork. Most teams only have 1-2, some with 3. Not many have all 4. But, you didn't want them in the tournament. Your feelings regarding last year's final ruled supreme over your desire to make this the best alliance tournament ever. Do I think you shouldn't host the AT? No, you obviously have a passion for it otherwise you wouldn't be replying about it on a Saturday afternoon when I presume you're off the clock. And the improvements to ship points/team sizes etc. should shake it up quite nicely, with more gank orientated setups which are more fun to watch than the logi orientated setups. Just admit that you had a lapse of judgement and for the greater good will allow them to submit a joint team and most of this will go away. As for deleting posts? Compare and contrast https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=113748 with http://eve-search.com/thread/113748-1.
I don't delete posts nor have I asked for any to be deleted. Please don't say what I did or didn't know. I'm not a psychic and neither are you. The email sent is irrelevant as I've already pointed out and I'm tired of explaining that. I'm also tired of explaining that how good someone is doesn't have any bearing on the rules or how they're applied.
I'm also tired of explaining that if I didn't want them in the tournament they wouldn't have been able to apply.
I know it all seems pretty simple when I write that but that's because it is.
You won't be seeing Hydra or Outbreak in this tournament in any form as per the stickies. I already said that as well. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:58:00 -
[374] - Quote
carbomb wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:[
None of those teams had a history of cheating using the exact same methods they were using again this year. Were we not to have to enforce these new rules a conversation with PL or RvB wouldn't have been necessary because those teams would have been in.
I hope this helps but it probably won't. I'm Sorry, where did it say that what happend in AT9 was against the rules? No rules were broken! therefore they can not be regarded as "cheats" for it. What would probably end all this posting is an admission from sreegs and co that basically this is them hitting back at last years finalists out of spite. You outmetagamed the metagamers and fair play ccp, you did it well. Just admit that this is payback and this matter will be closed. Its pretty pathetic how you are behaving. Most people can see that this was your attempt at revenge. You really are a bunch of kids at times. You made mistakes, you tried cover them up. admit your wrong doings and move along. By the way, If one of my employee's spoke to my customers the way you do to yours you would be out on your ear! Show some professionalism, man. also love how you hung the Senior GM who responded to Hydra/0utbreak out to dry to cover you behinds. Smooth!
Read the stickies. You seem to have missed them "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Intigo
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
47
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:59:00 -
[375] - Quote
Reiterating "read the stickies" does not explain anything at all. CVA & 4th considered doing the very same thing we did without being aware at all that it was not allowed because your rules were so vague that you can suit any ruling to fit your needs.
Does the fact that they had the same plan initially not give you a hint at how vague your ruleset is and how silly it is for the entire Alliance Tournament team to ignore all attempts at communication from Garmon?
And yet you instantly ban 3 teams taking all those things into consideration.
It's impressive. |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:59:00 -
[376] - Quote
iLLeLogicaL wrote:Even a simpleton can easily why they went off together for the sake of convenience. And if you're a bit serious about winning, like Hydra & outbreak are. You go practice in a wormhole.
They only need 1 corp. They can train against worthy adversaries. Fleet finder is a nifty handy tool when you can just tick "corporation".
And there's this super awesome feature introduced (after being pushed by an elected official of the playerbase, TwoStep) called Corporation Bookmarks.
As wormhole dwelling resident, I can tell you this one was a lifechanger.
If you're serious about winning you enter two teams and act that way. Just like every team that will be competing this year. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:00:00 -
[377] - Quote
Intigo wrote:Reiterating "read the stickies" does not explain anything at all. CVA & 4th considered doing the very same thing we did without being aware at all that it was not allowed because your rules were so vague that you can suit any ruling to fit your needs.
Does the fact that they had the same plan initially not give you a hint at how vague your ruleset is and how silly it is for the entire Alliance Tournament team to ignore all attempts at communication from Garmon?
And yet you instantly ban 3 teams taking all those things into consideration.
It's impressive.
Read the stickies. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

IamBeastx
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
21
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:00:00 -
[378] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote: We did mention it somewhere it just really isn't worth my time digging it up for people who won't be participating in this year's alliance tournament.
Of course it is, you are currently the only member of CCP staff actively and publicly replying to this issue. Most arguments are about them being completely excluded are based on no rules say 'A' teams will be banned as well if found to have 'B' / 'C' etc teams.
Your saying there is a section saying these teams will be removed but won't link/quote it.
Also, there are competing teams asking for this information so dig it up for them.
|

iLLeLogicaL
The Red Circle Inc.
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:00:00 -
[379] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:iLLeLogicaL wrote:Even a simpleton can easily why they went off together for the sake of convenience. And if you're a bit serious about winning, like Hydra & outbreak are. You go practice in a wormhole.
They only need 1 corp. They can train against worthy adversaries. Fleet finder is a nifty handy tool when you can just tick "corporation".
And there's this super awesome feature introduced (after being pushed by an elected official of the playerbase, TwoStep) called Corporation Bookmarks.
As wormhole dwelling resident, I can tell you this one was a lifechanger. If you're serious about winning you enter two teams and act that way. Just like every team that will be competing this year. And so they did! They just trained against each other! |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:01:00 -
[380] - Quote
iLLeLogicaL wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:iLLeLogicaL wrote:Even a simpleton can easily why they went off together for the sake of convenience. And if you're a bit serious about winning, like Hydra & outbreak are. You go practice in a wormhole.
They only need 1 corp. They can train against worthy adversaries. Fleet finder is a nifty handy tool when you can just tick "corporation".
And there's this super awesome feature introduced (after being pushed by an elected official of the playerbase, TwoStep) called Corporation Bookmarks.
As wormhole dwelling resident, I can tell you this one was a lifechanger. If you're serious about winning you enter two teams and act that way. Just like every team that will be competing this year. And so they did! They just trained against each other!
oh it's this old untruth again haven't seen that one before! "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club Dystopia Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:02:00 -
[381] - Quote
Quote:How can you justify banning HYDRA & Outbreak without any warning, without responding to any attempts at communication when other teams had considered doing the very same thing that HYDRA & Outbreak did in order to make wormhole practicing ENDURABLE?!
Without any warning ? Really ? Only if they were blind or didn't bother to read the rules. ENDURABLE ? Really ? You actually think it's that hard ? Maybe you should try actually living in a wormhole before acting like being in two corps and using two poses would've been an insurmountable obstacle.
As for other teams, they would've been able to get away with more due to a lack of history of collusion, but working that closely together is pretty dubious even when it isn't hydrabreak. |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:02:00 -
[382] - Quote
IamBeastx wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote: We did mention it somewhere it just really isn't worth my time digging it up for people who won't be participating in this year's alliance tournament.
Of course it is, you are currently the only member of CCP staff actively and publicly replying to this issue. Most arguments are about them being completely excluded are based on no rules say 'A' teams will be banned as well if found to have 'B' / 'C' etc teams. Your saying there is a section saying these teams will be removed but won't link/quote it. Also, there are competing teams asking for this information so dig it up for them.
Whether we'd remove both teams or not is irrelevant to the team in question who is spamming these forums at the moment. The team who won't be competing. I'll try to dig it up in a second. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Kalvunia IV
Born-2-Kill
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:03:00 -
[383] - Quote
Intigo wrote:Reiterating "read the stickies" does not explain anything at all. CVA & 4th considered doing the very same thing we did without being aware at all that it was not allowed because your rules were so vague that you can suit any ruling to fit your needs.
Does the fact that they had the same plan initially not give you a hint at how vague your ruleset is and how silly it is for the entire Alliance Tournament team to ignore all attempts at communication from Garmon?
And yet you instantly ban 3 teams taking all those things into consideration.
It's impressive.
I think it's becoming more and more apparent to everyone that answering simple questions with more then "read stickies" is above the dev in questions cognitive functions. |

Time Funnel
Ars ex Discordia Test Alliance Please Ignore
146
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:03:00 -
[384] - Quote
HYDRA RELOADED and Outbreak. (Refered to commonly as Hydra) seem to be missing the point. I still think that Outbreak. is the better team, but everyone calls them HYDRA.
It is not about words, statements, a-teams and b-teams. That is the way the rule is "worded" (which you are harping on) but that is not the point. Since you seem to be too dense to understand the meaning behind the rules, perhaps I will lay it all out for you in an easy to understand format which highlights the key points.
It is about COLLUSION.
Since you seem to not know what that is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collusion
And if you are too lazy to look at that here you go:
Collusion is an agreement between two or more persons, sometimes illegal and therefore secretive, to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair advantage.
Now what you did last year is you DEMONSTRATED a PATTERN of COLLUSION which NECESSITATED a RULE CHANGE which INCONVENIENCED a lot of LEGITIMATE TEAMS this year due to its IMPLEMENTATION. COLLUSION is BANNED in most tournament formats including poker for the UNFAIR ADVANTAGE that it give teams WORKING TOGETHER over the rest of the FIELD.
What you are doing this year is EXACTLY THE SAME as what you did last year, and CCP had NO CHOICE but to ban you.
Yes, you guys made a mistake. Karma is a *****.
Also to summarize what is going on in this thread.
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BHHAHAHWWWWHHAHAAAAAAAAA WHAAA WHHAAA WHHAAAAAAAAaAAAAAa |

Suleiman Shouaa
The Tuskers
72
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:04:00 -
[385] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Suleiman Shouaa wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:[quote=Suleiman Shouaa]CCP still mad due to AT IX Final (despite the semi-finals being better than most finals). CCP staff who are dedicated to the AT chose not to respond to Hydra's emails, despite responding to other emails from other teams. CCP bans 0utbreak/Genos, despite them having all the time in the world to tell them to knock it off if they actually wanted them in the tournament (ie. greater good for all the viewers). CCP starts deleting posts on forums related to this
:shocker: -snipe- I don't delete posts nor have I asked for any to be deleted. Please don't say what I did or didn't know. I'm not a psychic and neither are you. The email sent is irrelevant as I've already pointed out and I'm tired of explaining that. I'm also tired of explaining that how good someone is doesn't have any bearing on the rules or how they're applied. I'm also tired of explaining that if I didn't want them in the tournament they wouldn't have been able to apply. I know it all seems pretty simple when I write that but that's because it is. You won't be seeing Hydra or Outbreak in this tournament in any form as per the stickies. I already said that as well.
When did I say you were the one deleting them? I said "CCP starts deleting posts on forums related to this". Are you saying that someone outside CCP is deleting them? 
So if all teams are treated equally regardless of how good they, how come one team was responded to but another team or two wasn't responded to?
This is what I don't understand. You're willing to work with RvB, PL etc. so they can participate. But not with 0utbreak or Genos. Why not? And don't say they're previous cheaters when there were no rules against what they did (in fact, PL did the same thing, just were less successful - no insult to PL meant).
There's a difference between being firm and just refusing to listen. |

Karbox Delacroix
Emo Rage Quit
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:08:00 -
[386] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:
I'm not a psychic and neither are you.
Actually, yes you are, or at least you are claiming to be. You are claiming this because you seem to be stating that because they trained together, YOU KNOW FOR A FACT, that they intended to collude together during the ATX(*) and possibly throw matches like the final ATIX.
So yes, you are claiming a motivation that is inside the mind of the individuals. You would have to be psychic to know that they were intending to collude together because they were sparring together. |

Raimo
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
59
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:09:00 -
[387] - Quote
Ding feeble 20 page thread o/ |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:09:00 -
[388] - Quote
Suleiman Shouaa wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Suleiman Shouaa wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:[quote=Suleiman Shouaa]CCP still mad due to AT IX Final (despite the semi-finals being better than most finals). CCP staff who are dedicated to the AT chose not to respond to Hydra's emails, despite responding to other emails from other teams. CCP bans 0utbreak/Genos, despite them having all the time in the world to tell them to knock it off if they actually wanted them in the tournament (ie. greater good for all the viewers). CCP starts deleting posts on forums related to this
:shocker: -snipe- I don't delete posts nor have I asked for any to be deleted. Please don't say what I did or didn't know. I'm not a psychic and neither are you. The email sent is irrelevant as I've already pointed out and I'm tired of explaining that. I'm also tired of explaining that how good someone is doesn't have any bearing on the rules or how they're applied. I'm also tired of explaining that if I didn't want them in the tournament they wouldn't have been able to apply. I know it all seems pretty simple when I write that but that's because it is. You won't be seeing Hydra or Outbreak in this tournament in any form as per the stickies. I already said that as well. When did I say you were the one deleting them? I said "CCP starts deleting posts on forums related to this". Are you saying that someone outside CCP is deleting them?  So if all teams are treated equally regardless of how good they, how come one team was responded to but another team or two wasn't responded to?This is what I don't understand. You're willing to work with RvB, PL etc. so they can participate. But not with 0utbreak or Genos. Why not? And don't say they're previous cheaters when there were no rules against what they did (in fact, PL did the same thing, just were less successful - no insult to PL meant). There's a difference between being firm and just refusing to listen.
Neither one of those teams was cheating in this way. I hope this helps. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club Dystopia Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:09:00 -
[389] - Quote
iLLeLogicaL wrote:So do you have proof that this year they were going to do the same thing as last year? Did you watch them while traininig? Do you have a spy on their voice servers relaying you intel? Or which source is telling you that this year's AT will be the same one as the one before?
Because if the logs show nothing, what's your decision resting on.
You seem to be confused, CCP was never going to be able to know for sure, all they have to go on is appearances and pattern of behavior. Hydra and 0utbreak only have themselves to blame for presenting the wrong ones. |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1434

|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:10:00 -
[390] - Quote
Karbox Delacroix wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:
I'm not a psychic and neither are you.
Actually, yes you are, or at least you are claiming to be. You are claiming this because you seem to be stating that because they trained together, YOU KNOW FOR A FACT, that they intended to collude together during the ATX(*) and possibly throw matches like the final ATIX. So yes, you are claiming a motivation that is inside the mind of the individuals. You would have to be psychic to know that they were intending to collude together because they were sparring together.
No but what I do know is what they did last year and it won't be happening again now. You're welcome. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |