| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Isokuro
Yamamoto Tech.
16
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 08:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
This whole Ally system seems borked allready.
CCP should have never made it so that a defender allaince can ask multiple corps/ allainces for help and why ?
instead of boosting the Merc market you just destroyed it completely because there are allready a **** ton of corps and allaince that just ally up with everyone for having more targets. Making it harder to actually ask a price for being someones ally for a merc.
Same goes with the wars for big allainces in nullsec.
for a quick example: Against All Authorities wardecced Pandemic Legion. Now because of the higher wardec costs all the high sec pvp allainces and corporations are all offering to be an ally for PL like Flies on a big fat pile of **** just so they can have these free wars.
So within a week now all the big null sec allainces have discoverd that its actually not a great idea to officially wardec a other null sec allainces because of this chaining of allies. leaving your fantastic features made to get a better overall look at the warstats left in the totall dark once again and you all did it yourself by instead of leaving that number 1 ally and make limitles. Offcourse this is my personal view but didn't CCP see this comming ?
How do others think about the new wardec system ? ( would be nice if some guys from Merc allainces could give there opinion ) |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
553
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 08:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
We told them this would happen (Alekseyev Karrde made a big write-up on it in another forum section that summarized these concerns), and they didn't listen.
My take on it is that it was simply another concession to carebears, since these changes act as a painfully-obvious nerf to high-sec war aggression. |

MotherMoon
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
724
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 08:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sandbox
it'll work itself out
If the system wasn't open to this sort of abuse it would be too closed to promote sandbox gameplay. If the playerbase in eve want to ruin the ally system for a while, it'll happen.
CCP already knew this would be a great way to let people get free wars, and get their allies into war with them for free.
If anything if you're tagging your self as someone who needs defenders it should only be if you're looking to pay someone. There should be an easy way to bring in free allies without littering the merc marketplace with people who don't want someone to give them an offer. Why dust 514 is on Console and not PCBattle field 3 salesXbox 360: 2.2 millionPlayStation 3: 1.5 millionPC: 500,000 |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
554
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 08:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
How is it "sandbox?" I fail to see how it can be "sandbox," unless your definition of sandbox is having all the adults on the playground beat the living **** out of the kid who knocked down another kid's sandcastle.
Look, I'm all for the "if you wardec someone, you better be prepared to fight" ideology. But this is simply absurd. It removes all incentive for declaring war against someone, because no matter how much you like pvp, and no matter how fearless you are, having the enemy get infinite allies is just stupid. No amount of ridicule and chicken-calling is going to get me to engage three hundred people out of principle. |

Tobiaz
Spacerats
507
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 08:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nobody is forcing Pandemic Legion to seek allies. Nobody is forcing Pandemic Legion to accept ally requests.
Working as intended.
Only part that needs a real fix right now is not locking allies for the entire duration of a war. Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
743
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 08:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Isokuro wrote:This whole Ally system seems borked allready.
CCP should have never made it so that a defender allaince can ask multiple corps/ allainces for help and why ?
instead of boosting the Merc market you just destroyed it completely because there are allready a **** ton of corps and allaince that just ally up with everyone for having more targets. Making it harder to actually ask a price for being someones ally for a merc.
Same goes with the wars for big allainces in nullsec.
for a quick example: Against All Authorities wardecced Pandemic Legion. Now because of the higher wardec costs all the high sec pvp allainces and corporations are all offering to be an ally for PL like Flies on a big fat pile of **** just so they can have these free wars.
So within a week now all the big null sec allainces have discoverd that its actually not a great idea to officially wardec a other null sec allainces because of this chaining of allies. leaving your fantastic features made to get a better overall look at the warstats left in the totall dark once again and you all did it yourself by instead of leaving that number 1 ally and make limitles. Offcourse this is my personal view but didn't CCP see this comming ?
How do others think about the new wardec system ? ( would be nice if some guys from Merc allainces could give there opinion )
We didn't 'buddy up' to PL for a 'free war'
We did because it meant more opportunity to kill -A-.
FYI, PL are still red and we still shoot each other. Buf if a decision has to be made of who are better targets, it's -A- every time.
A list of fixes for the new inventory
Dual Pane idea clicky |

Shoot2kilI
The Milkmen Test Alliance Please Ignore
38
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 08:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
"Mercs" complaining about the 50m war declaration increase. "Mercs" then complain about getting free wars on other terrible primordial highsec dwellers who think that their army of hulks and level four mission-running ravens can blot out the sun. Complaining about more targets is literally the most ******** thing I've seen since Darius III's CSM thread(s). How more barely-combat-capable targets is a bad thing, I do not know. My alt is having a hilarious time blowing up "allied" orca's and mining barges/exhumers. |

Ziranda Hakuli
Relativity Holding Corp AAA Citizens
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 08:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
SHHHHH! your ruining it. the isk sink has a hole in it................... |

Ten Bulls
Sons of Olsagard
133
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 09:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:We told them this would happen ... and they didn't listen.
CCP have made concerted efforts so they look like they listen to the players, they even made the CSM with 14 players, 2 of which represent and care about the majority of players.
They post on these forums regularly telling us how it will be, and criticise or ignore objectors, and generally keeping us informed of who the boss is.
How is that now players can see through their mask... |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
554
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 09:04:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Nobody is forcing Pandemic Legion to seek allies. Nobody is forcing Pandemic Legion to accept ally requests.
Working as intended. I suppose that if CCP would add a big red button to the UI that allowed you to instantly destroy the ship of the player you're targeting, if you were the defending party in a war with that player's corporation, you wouldn't be forced to use it. But how many people wouldn't?
Shoot2kilI wrote:"Mercs" complaining about the 50m war declaration increase. "Mercs" then complain about getting free wars on other terrible primordial highsec dwellers who think that their army of hulks and level four mission-running ravens can blot out the sun. Complaining about more targets is literally the most ******** thing I've seen since Darius III's CSM thread(s). How more barely-combat-capable targets is a bad thing, I do not know. My alt is having a hilarious time blowing up "allied" orca's and mining barges/exhumers. Before the changes, there was an actual mercenary market where people could hire mercenaries by reputation, and mercenaries actually got paid for their work. What we have now is a bunch of privateer-style groups doing the same for free. So point 1 is that there is no more mercenary work, because mercenaries get paid. Point 2 is that this will result in many less outgoing wars. Sure, the more skilled players will be able to evade the allies while achieving their goals, but the average corporation declaring upon another will get absolutely stomped because the defenders will bring in at least a few hundred people by clicking a single button.
Ten Bulls wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:We told them this would happen ... and they didn't listen. CCP have made concerted efforts so they look like they listen to the players, they even made the CSM with 14 players, 2 of which represent and care about the majority of players. They post on these forums regularly telling us how it will be, and criticise or ignore objectors, and generally keeping us informed of who the boss is. How is that now players can see through their mask... In my many years here, I can say that this has been one of their worst gameplay decisions ever made. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
902
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 09:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Tobiaz wrote:Nobody is forcing Pandemic Legion to seek allies. Nobody is forcing Pandemic Legion to accept ally requests.
Working as intended. I suppose that if CCP would add a big red button to the UI that allowed you to instantly destroy the ship of the player you're targeting, if you were the defending party in a war with that player's corporation, you wouldn't be forced to use it. But how many people wouldn't? Shoot2kilI wrote:"Mercs" complaining about the 50m war declaration increase. "Mercs" then complain about getting free wars on other terrible primordial highsec dwellers who think that their army of hulks and level four mission-running ravens can blot out the sun. Complaining about more targets is literally the most ******** thing I've seen since Darius III's CSM thread(s). How more barely-combat-capable targets is a bad thing, I do not know. My alt is having a hilarious time blowing up "allied" orca's and mining barges/exhumers. Before the changes, there was an actual mercenary market where people could hire mercenaries by reputation, and mercenaries actually got paid for their work. What we have now is a bunch of privateer-style groups doing the same for free. So point 1 is that there is no more mercenary work, because mercenaries get paid. Point 2 is that this will result in many less outgoing wars. Sure, the more skilled players will be able to evade the allies while achieving their goals, but the average corporation declaring upon another will get absolutely stomped because the defenders will bring in at least a few hundred people by clicking a single button. Ten Bulls wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:We told them this would happen ... and they didn't listen. CCP have made concerted efforts so they look like they listen to the players, they even made the CSM with 14 players, 2 of which represent and care about the majority of players. They post on these forums regularly telling us how it will be, and criticise or ignore objectors, and generally keeping us informed of who the boss is. How is that now players can see through their mask... In my many years here, I can say that this has been one of their worst gameplay decisions ever made.
It could be worse. They could have unified the whole wardec system in the smart Unified Interface To Rule Them All. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
303
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 09:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
Agreed. If one corp war decs you, you should only be able to hire one ally. |

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
1046
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 10:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Nobody is forcing Pandemic Legion to seek allies. Nobody is forcing Pandemic Legion to accept ally requests.
Working as intended.
Only part that needs a real fix right now is not locking allies for the entire duration of a war.
At most, there should probably be a small ISK fee (5-20M ISK) paid by the defender for each ally accepted. Putting a hard limit on how many allies you can accept would be too limiting given the open nature of EVE game play. Especially since you can't un-invite an ally to the war, so if you're limited to N allies and your first N allies are bogus choices, you'd be stuck without the ability to hire competent ally N+1 who shows up a day late with an offer.
Maybe once the defender has more control over ally contracts with expiration dates (CCP says this is coming soon), renewals and (most important) the ability to terminate ally contracts; then we can discuss putting limits on how many allies you can bring into the war.
The rest will be sorted out by the market. Including the going rate for good mercenary allies. But I expect that the first few weeks will see merc corps going in as allies on as many wardecs as possible as a way to build their history and try and fluff their numbers for future business.
|

BTL Thumps Up
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 10:43:00 -
[14] - Quote
more pvp? sounds grand also stop smeaningless wars wars should be SERIOUS BUSINESS I liked the part where wars were meaningful THUMPS UP IF BTL |

Christine Peeveepeeski
Killing With Kindness The Rat Race
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 11:03:00 -
[15] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:How is it "sandbox?" I fail to see how it can be "sandbox," unless your definition of sandbox is having all the adults on the playground beat the living **** out of the kid who knocked down another kid's sandcastle. Look, I'm all for the "if you wardec someone, you better be prepared to fight" ideology. But this is simply absurd. It removes all incentive for declaring war against someone, because no matter how much you like pvp, and no matter how fearless you are, having the enemy get infinite allies is just stupid. No amount of ridicule and chicken-calling is going to get me to engage three hundred people out of principle.
Not trying to troll or pick a fight here but you've raised an interesting point in the bolded part.
I would ask what was the incentive to start with? I hazard a guess that for most high sec wardeccers its just easy kills. Not all of course, but most. Those with balls will still dec a target if the reason to attack that target goes beyond easy fights because there is a reason to. If they know allies will engage in return then best they have friends of their own to counter dec the target corp.
|

Tobiaz
Spacerats
509
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 11:10:00 -
[16] - Quote
People should stop making up problems where there are none.
"Defending corporations shouldn't be able to add endless amounts of 'free' allies." Is this happening now? NOT AT ALL Besides, actually useful allies are almost never of the 'free' variety.
And if you are getting a ton of ally requests from tiny corporations wanting to jump on the free wardec-bandwagon, just convo them and charge them a fee for acceptng the rather useless 'ally' request. Complaining about ally-request spam is rather silly tbh. Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |

Fuji 9000
Sleeping Dogs Awake
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 11:36:00 -
[17] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote: In my many years here, I can say that this has been one of their worst gameplay decisions ever made.
completely agree.. it would have been much better if they didn't change anything and just fixed decshielding
I would like to hear from people that have deced smaller ~100 man corps, I assume they are spamming allies as well?
|

non judgement
Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance
779
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 12:06:00 -
[18] - Quote
A bit early to tell isn't it?
I would have thought that you'd have to wait a while before you can see which corps are good in the ally system. Of course it's going to get a bit weird in the first few weeks. When it settles down the good merc corps will have good records. The dodgy corps you'll be able to see their bad record of helping and you wont pay their fee.
How would anyone expect to be able to tell if it's good in such a short time?
It'd be better to wait a month or so and then see if sort of stuff is still happening. Making a judgement about how the system will work just after a few days is a waste of time. Eg. when CCP does something that causes a change in the market prices. After awhile you can see how it really changed the market. But saying something about the market right at the time of speculation and manipulation when CCP changes it, is silly. |

Jessica Sweetwater
Novindus Equilibrium Frentix Alliance
72
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 12:08:00 -
[19] - Quote
RAGE HARDER |

Mindfarer
Ruatha Holding
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 12:17:00 -
[20] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote: Before the changes, there was an actual mercenary market where people could hire mercenaries by reputation, and mercenaries actually got paid for their work. What we have now is a bunch of privateer-style groups doing the same for free. So point 1 is that there is no more mercenary work, because mercenaries get paid. Point 2 is that this will result in many less outgoing wars. Sure, the more skilled players will be able to evade the allies while achieving their goals, but the average corporation declaring upon another will get absolutely stomped because the defenders will bring in at least a few hundred people by clicking a single button.
That's free market. High supply (of trigger-happy people, this game surely doesn't lack of them) vs low demand (from warring corps) oviously drives prices down. This is as it should be.
if people want specialized services they will still go to professional mercs, and professional mercs can still try to convince a wardecced party that paying for specialized services alongside an unorganized mob is better than having just an unorganized mob for free.
I don't dispute that the system needs some tweaks, but the free market aspect of it should stay here. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
555
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 12:17:00 -
[21] - Quote
non judgement wrote:I would have thought that you'd have to wait a while before you can see which corps are good in the ally system. Of course it's going to get a bit weird in the first few weeks. When it settles down the good merc corps will have good records. The dodgy corps you'll be able to see their bad record of helping and you wont pay their fee. We already have a developed mercenary market, with many corporations and alliances that have good (and not so good) records.
The problem is that because of this change, all of the blanket-war groups (the ones that declare war on as many large entities as they can to have as many war targets as possible, as opposed to mercenary groups or war corporations that target more specific targets but in less numbers) are going to be accepting the ally requests for free.
Don't get me wrong, I think blanket war groups are great, and I have nothing against them. I loved pre-nerf privateers, even though at that point in time I was a null-sec dweller, and the alliances I was in were frequently targeted by them. It's just that now these guys will inadvertently ruin the mercenary market, as well as small-scale wars in general. Before the change, the war fees prevented them from doing so, but now they're free to offer assistance to any and all entities that request it, without charging a dime. The defenders would be stupid to not take up these offers, while the aggressors will be so inhibited that few will continue their activities.
CCP said this expansion was all about war; the only thing it will do in the long run is significantly decrease the amount of wars we have. |

Mocam
EVE University Ivy League
120
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 12:22:00 -
[22] - Quote
If it doesn't - Force a blue +10 standings on allies when accepted by a wardec'd corp.
+10 = Awoxer. Can't trust your allies = hire mercs.
Just give it a couple months to sort itself out with exploits of this nature. A small blip on the isk income for mercs until it sorts out is all. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
555
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 12:26:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mocam wrote:If it doesn't - Force a blue +10 standings on allies when accepted by a wardec'd corp.
+10 = Awoxer. Can't trust your allies = hire mercs. What? |

Plentath
Sudden Buggery
50
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 12:33:00 -
[24] - Quote
It works fine.
If you want random scrubs helping you (and everyone else) at the same time, accept the free offers.
If you want a powerful ally that will actually hunt and destroy the target effectively, pay for it like you would before.
The good thing~ about these changes is that it lowers the barriers to entry for mercs and allows small upstarts to get their name known without needing to post to C&P with no killboard history and getting trolled by Jita 4-4 campers.
+1 on the change, work with it not against it. |

Fuji 9000
Sleeping Dogs Awake
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 13:00:00 -
[25] - Quote
Plentath wrote:It works fine. If you want a powerful ally that will actually hunt and destroy the target effectively, pay for it like you would before. you're missing the point, why hire a 'powerful ally' and pay them what they are worth, when you can hire unlimited scrubs for free? most corps/alliances will go the free option |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
305
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 13:08:00 -
[26] - Quote
Isokuro wrote:So within a week now all the big null sec allainces have discoverd that its actually not a great idea to officially wardec a other null sec allainces because of this chaining of allies.
Yes, we all saw this coming. Yes we complained. Yes, it's as un-thought out as the UI Windows...and all development and implementation advice offered was ignored.
All I can say is....like me, get out of this mess while you can.
Good Luck. I think that God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability. In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
590
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 13:32:00 -
[27] - Quote
Plentath wrote:It works fine.
If you want random scrubs helping you (and everyone else) at the same time, accept the free offers.
If you want a powerful ally that will actually hunt and destroy the target effectively, pay for it like you would before. Except the people who are putting out 0.00isk assistance offers are the exact same people who are listed in the merc contracts channel. So no, not really. |

Mocam
EVE University Ivy League
120
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 13:44:00 -
[28] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Mocam wrote:If it doesn't - Force a blue +10 standings on allies when accepted by a wardec'd corp.
+10 = Awoxer. Can't trust your allies = hire mercs. What?
You're joking, right? If not ...
If the system sets all accepted allies to blue at +10 standings, then they aren't seen as hostiles.
Awoxer is someone who joins a group to then provide warp-ins to hostiles. A short-term spy gig used to mess up those that see them as friendly. It happens a bit in nullsec -- get "blue" to an alliance by joining it or a pet/friendly. The way many setup their overviews there, they turn off blues in local. As such, you warp to someone who's doing PvE stuff and have hostiles warp in to kill them.
It can tend to mess up trust.
With respect to this - simply have an alt group offer to help against your mains corporation, use that blue standing to get in close on their stuff and have your buddies come in and blow them up.
A couple such stunts and trust in accepting help takes a big dive.
It's not difficult to see this being done *IF* it is possible for griefer types to pull it off and once it starts, trust in strangers offering help won't last -- merc contracts go back in vogue vs accepting help "for free".
This is EVE and trusting someone to help that you don't know... I seriously doubt I'm the first to look at this notion and see the potential griefer side but, then again, I do hold a huge paranoia gig about others in this game so tend to look for what dangers may be lurking in any such game changes that come around.
If that standings for accepting help isn't in there, then request it and let the nature of the player base push things back to "normal" distrust. |

engjin
The Konvergent League
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 14:01:00 -
[29] - Quote
Isokuro wrote: instead of boosting the Merc market you just destroyed it completely because there are allready a **** ton of corps and allaince that just ally up with everyone for having more targets. Making it harder to actually ask a price for being someones ally for a merc.
Same goes with the wars for big allainces in nullsec.
for a quick example: Against All Authorities wardecced Pandemic Legion. Now because of the higher wardec costs all the high sec pvp allainces and corporations are all offering to be an ally for PL like Flies on a big fat pile of **** just so they can have these free wars.
Working as intended. People want more PVP and they're getting it, win win. Will 'real' merc corps/ alliances still get good contracts? Yes.
The Corp's and Alliance's getting freebies have no skin in the game. They don't have to engage or get any results at all. You get what you pay for. Of course scammers, bad merc corps or those that are up and coming will post cheaper rates than more popular ones but in the end if I want an outcome or a specific objective achieved I'm going to pay to have it done and will go to Noir, etc. to get it.
|

Kiandoshia
Gnampf Inc.
94
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 14:10:00 -
[30] - Quote
Isokuro wrote: but didn't CCP see this comming ? )
:D |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |