| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1667
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 04:50:00 -
[31] - Quote
Mcpewy wrote:Anyone aiding a pirate gets gcc. If a pirate takes a ship out of an orca it can be attacked just like the pirate can be. No warping to gates or docking for 15 minutes. Just like a remote repper gets in trouble so should a orca for suppling the ship to a pirate.
GCC in HS = Concord. Do you really want to be CONCORDED every time you spit your Hulk out of your Orca? Single-Shard, Player Driven-áSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |

Large Marg
University of Caille Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 04:55:00 -
[32] - Quote
Total sandbox mmo, CCP will do nothing.
Other side is new players that have little ISK get a new mining ship.
*GANKED* and now they are distressed and quit Eve.
Eve already has issue with low numbers of new users.
So basically YES is fun to gank and pop ships, down side is without new players and ganked players leaving, Eve slowly withers and dies. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1667
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 04:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Large Marg wrote:Total sandbox mmo, CCP will do nothing.
Other side is new players that have little ISK get a new mining ship.
*GANKED* and now they are distressed and quit Eve.
Eve already has issue with low numbers of new users.
So basically YES is fun to gank and pop ships, down side is without new players and ganked players leaving, Eve slowly withers and dies.
If you're flying a Hulk you are not a new player. Single-Shard, Player Driven-áSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |

Mcpewy
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:01:00 -
[34] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Mcpewy wrote:Anyone aiding a pirate gets gcc. If a pirate takes a ship out of an orca it can be attacked just like the pirate can be. No warping to gates or docking for 15 minutes. Just like a remote repper gets in trouble so should a orca for suppling the ship to a pirate. GCC in HS = Concord. Do you really want to be CONCORDED every time you spit your Hulk out of your Orca?
I said same mechanic as a remote rep. If a remote repper reps a pirate what happens? It wont affect me cause i won't be aiding a pirate. Whatever no concord just able to be attacked for 15 minutes. Mind is on low sec lol. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1667
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
Mcpewy wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Mcpewy wrote:Anyone aiding a pirate gets gcc. If a pirate takes a ship out of an orca it can be attacked just like the pirate can be. No warping to gates or docking for 15 minutes. Just like a remote repper gets in trouble so should a orca for suppling the ship to a pirate. GCC in HS = Concord. Do you really want to be CONCORDED every time you spit your Hulk out of your Orca? I said same mechanic as a remote rep. If a remote repper reps a pirate what happens? It wont affect me cause i won't be aiding a pirate. Whatever no concord just able to be attacked for 15 minutes. Mind is on low sec lol.
Repping an Outlaw gives you an aggression timer for 15m. It doesn't stop you from warping or docking, it just lets anyone shoot you in the next 15m. Since gankers jet the destroyers at safespots, this would have no effect.
Repping someone who's GCC gets you GCC and thus Concorded.
All of that is moot since nobody actually has to board the ship from the hangar. The orca can just jettison the destroyer, then the ganker board it.
Either the Orca gets a criminal aggro timer every time it jettisons a ship (meaning anyone can tackle and kill your orca if you jet a hulk), or your proposal will not affect gankers at all (it won't either way, but the first one at least gives the ganker's orca an aggro timer)
Are Miners in HS really this clueless about the mechanics of the game they play? Single-Shard, Player Driven-áSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |

Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Guards Hades.
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:10:00 -
[36] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:The ganker loses a ship & it's mods, whatever resides in the cargohold, sec status, gains a 15 minute GCC timer, can be shot by anyone for the duration & receives no insurance payout. Can you really say the penalties are too low? Yet all of those negatives are of little to no consequence to the ganker.
Taking all of those into consideration, the ganker has made a cost/benefit analysis and made a conscious decision that their course of action is of greater benefit than cost to them.
If the ganker had any regard for the ship they were flying, their security status, GCC timer, no insurance payout, then...
They wouldn't do it. EVE: The most hardcore thing out of Iceland since Eric the Red. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1667
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:17:00 -
[37] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:The ganker loses a ship & it's mods, whatever resides in the cargohold, sec status, gains a 15 minute GCC timer, can be shot by anyone for the duration & receives no insurance payout. Can you really say the penalties are too low? Yet all of those negatives are of little to no consequence to the ganker. Taking all of those into consideration, the ganker has made a cost/benefit analysis and made a conscious decision that their course of action is of greater benefit than cost to them.
Then Hulk pilots should probably do their cost/benefit analysis and decide if mining in untanked, max yield hulks is of greater benefit that the cost (value of ship/chance of gank) to them. Single-Shard, Player Driven-áSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
349
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:17:00 -
[38] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:The ganker loses a ship & it's mods, whatever resides in the cargohold, sec status, gains a 15 minute GCC timer, can be shot by anyone for the duration & receives no insurance payout. Can you really say the penalties are too low? Yet all of those negatives are of no to little consequence to the ganker. If the ganker had any regard for the ship they were flying, their security status, GCC timer, no insurance payout, then... They wouldn't do it. Taking all of those into consideration, the ganker has made a cost/benefit analysis and made a conscious decision that their course of action is of greater benefit than cost to them.
Imposing stiffer penalties doesn't really do much to lower crime rates. But ultimately it's all dumb logic because you are thinking in real life terms. This is a game: The only risk at any point in time ever to me as a PVP/GANK/SUPERGRIEFER pilot is that my time is wasted, assuming that's what my goals are (They aren't, I play eve for the Empire building and the giant space battles like in starwars only with slightly worse art design).
A great example would be the Burn Jita freighter interdiction: A lot of people thought we were making money off of that.
We weren't. Oh a few goons may have become independently wealthy from it due to market speculation and scooping the right thing at the right time, but as an alliance, it cost a lot more money than it brought in. The net payout to the organization was in entertainment. The fleets that came to fight us were fun, the freighters that came to blow up were also fun.
So when factoring in your equations don't forget to also toss in entertainment value for the person perpetuating the deed. |

Mcpewy
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:26:00 -
[39] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Mcpewy wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Mcpewy wrote:Anyone aiding a pirate gets gcc. If a pirate takes a ship out of an orca it can be attacked just like the pirate can be. No warping to gates or docking for 15 minutes. Just like a remote repper gets in trouble so should a orca for suppling the ship to a pirate. GCC in HS = Concord. Do you really want to be CONCORDED every time you spit your Hulk out of your Orca? I said same mechanic as a remote rep. If a remote repper reps a pirate what happens? It wont affect me cause i won't be aiding a pirate. Whatever no concord just able to be attacked for 15 minutes. Mind is on low sec lol. Repping an Outlaw gives you an aggression timer for 15m. It doesn't stop you from warping or docking, it just lets anyone shoot you in the next 15m. Since gankers jet the destroyers at safespots, this would have no effect. Repping someone who's GCC gets you GCC and thus Concorded. All of that is moot since nobody actually has to board the ship from the hangar. The orca can just jettison the destroyer, then the ganker board it. Either the Orca gets a criminal aggro timer every time it jettisons a ship (meaning anyone can tackle and kill your orca if you jet a hulk), or your proposal will not affect gankers at all (it won't either way, but the first one at least gives the ganker's orca an aggro timer) Are Miners in HS really this clueless about the mechanics of the game they play?
Acutally no i don't know how a ganker does his thing, i don't do it. I know i can right click a orca open ship hanger and hit board ship on one of the ships and the ship pops out and i get in it. So yeah i know how a orca works but i don't know how you guys gank. Did not think about jetting the ship out so i admit was a bad idea. I know mechanics but not how the the gankers do thier thing. |

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
498
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:27:00 -
[40] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:Taking all of those into consideration, the ganker has made a cost/benefit analysis and made a conscious decision that their course of action is of greater benefit than cost to them.. This is what makes a ganker a higher being than a miner. If the miner could learn to do the same he would evolve. But there is little proof such thing is even possible. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
66
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:27:00 -
[41] - Quote
Ganking isn't as easy as one may think. Don't forget the victim only sees the epitome of the gank; that final 10 seconds climax of work the ganker had to do. One mistake, and the gank will fail.
A successful gank takes a good amount of preparation, scouting, logistics and tactical positioning. On top of that there are factors which the ganker can never be 100% sure of such as skills trained.
The "art" of ganking relies on figuring out the cheapest setup(s) for the gank.
Ganking actually takes more work than gate camping, unless you plan to overkill. The best gankers do not overkill and are ready to get the occasional failed gank. |

Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Guards Hades.
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Imposing stiffer penalties doesn't really do much to lower crime rates. But ultimately it's all dumb logic because you are thinking in real life terms. This is a game: The only risk at any point in time ever to me as a PVP/GANK/SUPERGRIEFER pilot is that my time is wasted, assuming that's what my goals are (They aren't, I play eve for the Empire building and the giant space battles like in starwars only with slightly worse art design).
A great example would be the Burn Jita freighter interdiction: A lot of people thought we were making money off of that.
We weren't. Oh a few goons may have become independently wealthy from it due to market speculation and scooping the right thing at the right time, but as an alliance, it cost a lot more money than it brought in. The net payout to the organization was in entertainment. The fleets that came to fight us were fun, the freighters that came to blow up were also fun.
So when factoring in your equations don't forget to also toss in entertainment value for the person perpetuating the deed. I wasn't making a judgment call on the act of suicide ganking.
And when I spoke of cost/benefit analysis, I didn't mean to imply solely in ISK terms. The cost and benefit can be anything.
I plan to fork over $15 to go see Prometheus next week for entertainment. There's a cost ($15) and a benefit (entertainment).
The concept of labor/leisure trade-off is pretty basic, I recall going over it in Econ 1101. EVE: The most hardcore thing out of Iceland since Eric the Red. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1668
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
Mcpewy wrote:
Acutally no i don't know how a ganker does his thing, i don't do it. I know i can right click a orca open ship hanger and hit board ship on one of the ships and the ship pops out and i get in it. So yeah i know how a orca works but i don't know how you guys gank. Did not think about jetting the ship out so i admit was a bad idea. I know mechanics but not how the the gankers do thier thing.
You were confused about the simplest HS aggression mechanics. You don't know about the mechanics of the space you live in. Single-Shard, Player Driven-áSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |

Mallak Azaria
xX-Crusader-Xx Luna Sanguinem
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:47:00 -
[44] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:The ganker loses a ship & it's mods, whatever resides in the cargohold, sec status, gains a 15 minute GCC timer, can be shot by anyone for the duration & receives no insurance payout. Can you really say the penalties are too low? Yet all of those negatives are of little to no consequence to the ganker. Taking all of those into consideration, the ganker has made a cost/benefit analysis and made a conscious decision that their course of action is of greater benefit than cost to them. If the ganker had any regard for the ship they were flying, their security status, GCC timer, no insurance payout, then... They wouldn't do it.
So what you're saying is a miner does not make the same cost/benefit analysis because they have no regard for the ship they're flying? That explains a lot. |

Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Guards Hades.
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:52:00 -
[45] - Quote
Actually, if you re-read my post, I didn't say anything about miners, nor did I mean to imply anything with regards to miners.
read into [ri-Éd] vb (tr, preposition) to discern in or infer from a statement (meanings not intended by the speaker or writer) http://www.thefreedictionary.com/read+into EVE: The most hardcore thing out of Iceland since Eric the Red. |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
613
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 05:59:00 -
[46] - Quote
People get very confused about the concept of risk.
When people are talking about how carebears are risk averse they are talking about how a carebear is averse to the risk of loss. The same concept doesn't apply to gankers because in their situation the same loss the potential for which a carebear is averse to is an inherent part of what the ganker is doing, they accept that the loss is going to happen and decide whether or not they are going to try and gank a potential target based on how likely they think they are to succeed and how badly they want the target dead, the risk is the potential waste of resources and opportunity in the entirely likely event of failure.
Talking about risk by comparing suicide ganking as an activity to a moron in a faction fitted BS accepting a L4 in lowsec is moronic because even a child could tell you that the one individual is actively worried about avoiding a loss and the other has accepted loss as a given and will subsequently have totally different concepts of what constitutes an undesirable outcome. |

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:03:00 -
[47] - Quote
Put an end to suicide ganking, CCP!
Remove this silly sec status thing, get rid of concord and everybody will be just fine. |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
1492
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:05:00 -
[48] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Many posts are appearing of late asking if the penalty for suicide-ganking is too low. From the gankees point of view, it probably is. They lost a ship. I will now put to you the other side of the argument. Suicide-gankers blow people up for many reasons. It may be for profit, in response to a player event or in many cases, they do it simply because it's fun[ny]. Now lets talk about penalties.
The gankee loses a ship & it's mods, plus whatever else resides in the cargohold. The ganker loses a ship & it's mods, whatever resides in the cargohold, sec status, gains a 15 minute GCC timer, can be shot by anyone for the duration & receives no insurance payout. Can you really say the penalties are too low?
Eve is supposed to be cold and heartless as per mittens and his rants on ten ton hammer
Therefore, the cost to gankers is not high enough. |

Mallak Azaria
xX-Crusader-Xx Luna Sanguinem
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:15:00 -
[49] - Quote
Asuka Solo wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Many posts are appearing of late asking if the penalty for suicide-ganking is too low. From the gankees point of view, it probably is. They lost a ship. I will now put to you the other side of the argument. Suicide-gankers blow people up for many reasons. It may be for profit, in response to a player event or in many cases, they do it simply because it's fun[ny]. Now lets talk about penalties.
The gankee loses a ship & it's mods, plus whatever else resides in the cargohold. The ganker loses a ship & it's mods, whatever resides in the cargohold, sec status, gains a 15 minute GCC timer, can be shot by anyone for the duration & receives no insurance payout. Can you really say the penalties are too low? Eve is supposed to be cold and heartless as per mittens and his rants on ten ton hammer Therefore, the cost to gankers is not high enough.
This is a matter of penalties, not cost. |

Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
252
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:16:00 -
[50] - Quote
Whilst I have no issue with ganking, (this is Eve after all) I would suggest that if player numbers do really drop due to ganking, then CCP will feel under pressure to do something about it.
Of course, the problem CCP may well then face, is that those who favour ganking might quit in protest.
CCP could well find themselves caught between a rock and a hard place.
Interesting times. You want fries with that? |

Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Guards Hades.
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:17:00 -
[51] - Quote
Quote:This is a matter of penalties, not cost. A penalty is a type of cost. EVE: The most hardcore thing out of Iceland since Eric the Red. |

Mallak Azaria
xX-Crusader-Xx Luna Sanguinem
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:22:00 -
[52] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:Quote:This is a matter of penalties, not cost. A penalty is a type of cost.
penalty [pen-l-tee]
1. a punishment imposed or incurred for a violation of law or rule.
2. a loss, forfeiture, suffering, or the like, to which one subjects oneself by nonfulfillment of some obligation.
3. a disadvantage imposed upon one of the competitors or upon one side for infraction of the rules of a game, sport, etc.
4. consequence or disadvantage attached to any action, condition, etc.
See what I did there? |

Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Guards Hades.
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:27:00 -
[53] - Quote
And a penalty, by definition, is a type of cost. Like an orange is a fruit, or a dog is a mammal, or the Sun is a star.
Quote:cost (k+¦st): n.2. The expenditure of something, such as time or labor, necessary for the attainment of a goal. It was necessary for Hank to expend hard-earned security standing to attain his goal of suicide ganking that ship.v.intr.To require a specified payment, expenditure, effort, or loss. By suicide ganking, Hank will lose security standing.v.tr.2. To cause to lose, suffer, or sacrifice. The act of suicide ganking cost Hank 0.1 points of security standing. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cost
Quote:Main Entry: penalty GÇé[pen-l-tee] Show IPA Part of Speech:noun Definition:punishment Synonyms:amends, amercement, cost, damages, disadvantage, discipline, dues, fall, fine, forfeit, forfeiture, handicap, mortification, mulct, price, rap, retribution http://thesaurus.com/browse/penalty?s=t EVE: The most hardcore thing out of Iceland since Eric the Red. |

Mallak Azaria
xX-Crusader-Xx Luna Sanguinem
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:33:00 -
[54] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:And a penalty, by definition, is a type of cost. Like an orange is a fruit, or a dog is a mammal, or the Sun is a star. Quote:cost (k+¦st): n.2. The expenditure of something, such as time or labor, necessary for the attainment of a goal. v.intr.To require a specified payment, expenditure, effort, or loss. v.tr.2. To cause to lose, suffer, or sacrifice. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cost Quote:Main Entry: penalty GÇé[pen-l-tee] Show IPA Part of Speech:noun Definition:punishment Synonyms:amends, amercement, cost, damages, disadvantage, discipline, dues, fall, fine, forfeit, forfeiture, handicap, mortification, mulct, price, rap, retribution http://thesaurus.com/browse/penalty?s=t
Can be* a type of cost, but not always. As just proven by your skills with a dictionary. This thread is not referring to the cost of suicide ganking, but the penalties. |

Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Guards Hades.
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:38:00 -
[55] - Quote
What you mean to say, is that this thread isn't about monetary (i.e. ISK) expenditure.
Penalties and monetary expenditure, are both costs.
For example:
That drunken hookup with that sorority girl cost me my marriage.
My divorce cost me the house, my convertible, and my credit rating. EVE: The most hardcore thing out of Iceland since Eric the Red. |

Mallak Azaria
xX-Crusader-Xx Luna Sanguinem
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:52:00 -
[56] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:That drunken hookup with that sorority girl cost me my marriage.
My divorce cost me the house, my convertible, and my credit rating.
I hope she was worth it. |

Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Guards Hades.
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:56:00 -
[57] - Quote
Hooked up with many-a-sorority girl, never been married, fortunately.
EVE: The most hardcore thing out of Iceland since Eric the Red. |

Mallak Azaria
xX-Crusader-Xx Luna Sanguinem
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:58:00 -
[58] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:Hooked up with many-a-sorority girl, never been married, fortunately.
I've never been married either, but it's looking like gay marriage will be legalised in my country soon, so that will probably change. |

Mallak Azaria
xX-Crusader-Xx Luna Sanguinem
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 06:59:00 -
[59] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:The "art" of ganking.
Thor Kerrigan's "The Art of Ganking".
You should write a guide :) |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
370
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 07:11:00 -
[60] - Quote
The main problem in this whole debate seems to be that there is little or no control on the recycling of characters because their security status is to low EULA clearly states that the repeated recycling of characters due to low security status is seen as a exploit by ccp It only takes a relative short time to train for a dedicated suicide pilot even so shorter than trying to recover your security status thru grinding belt rats in low or 0.0 sec, second also takes effort something these griefers tend to avoid at all cost , effort
CCP been so transfixed on finding rmt traders and bots , rightly so, that they have little or norescources left to check all the characters being recycled
so ppeople are fully abusing the recycling of characters who s sec status be ame so low due to suicideganking that they can t even enter high sec anymore
Better and more control will go a long way I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |