| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
481
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:21:00 -
[211] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Would you mind running the numbers for some home-made thermite? It isn't that expensive, as I understand it. Home made Thermite
Iron Oxide - by the pound Aluminum Powder Magnesium Ribbon
Understand Thermite is legal to own in the US - your jurisdiction may have other rules!
Enjoy...
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
813
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:26:00 -
[212] - Quote
Thanks for the quick analysis. I totally see why miners complain about their high-value specialized equipment being susceptible basically to ships that amount to thermite on a frame with a prop mod and a warp drive.
This is truly enlightening! He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Barbelo Valentinian
The Scope Gallente Federation
284
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:32:00 -
[213] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
So your argument that something cheaper shouldn't be able to do so much damage to something so much more expensive is actually very, very much wrong...
The argument fails in terms of "do serious damage to" or "cripple", but it doesn't necessarily fail in terms of "blowing the whole thing to smithereens". Ships in EVE are blown to smithereens, there's no such thing as "blow a hole in the side of" or "cripple".
How much TNT would it take to actually totally blow up an entire oil tanker so that all that's left is a few bits of scrap metal?
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
813
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:34:00 -
[214] - Quote
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:
So your argument that something cheaper shouldn't be able to do so much damage to something so much more expensive is actually very, very much wrong...
The argument fails in terms of "do serious damage to" or "cripple", but it doesn't necessarily fail in terms of "blowing the whole thing to smithereens". Ships in EVE are blown to smithereens, there's no such thing as "blow a hole in the side of" or "cripple". How much TNT would it take to actually totally blow up an entire oil tanker so that all that's left is a few bits of scrap metal?
In Eve Online we have wrecks. They are remnants of destroyed fuselages which are not smithereens, but in fact are containers.
Within these wrecks one frequently finds goodies such as drops.
In an oil tanker this could presumably include a wrecked tanker, frightened passengers, and some remnant of the oil cargo. Not to mention the highly-sought-after metal scraps. 
He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
481
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 22:20:00 -
[215] - Quote
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:
So your argument that something cheaper shouldn't be able to do so much damage to something so much more expensive is actually very, very much wrong...
The argument fails in terms of "do serious damage to" or "cripple", but it doesn't necessarily fail in terms of "blowing the whole thing to smithereens". Ships in EVE are blown to smithereens, there's no such thing as "blow a hole in the side of" or "cripple". How much TNT would it take to actually totally blow up an entire oil tanker so that all that's left is a few bits of scrap metal?
Asuri Kinnes wrote:(I hope you will agree that 14K pound of C4 or TNT, used appropriately, would destroy a tanker [i.e. - make it useless] just as few cheap-fit dessies can destroy [or make useless] a hulk)
TBQH - From my time in the Navy, I could probably sink a tanker with much less than 14K pounds of C4.... Using shaped charges I could probably get by with 500 to 750 pounds alone... The thing is "appropriately applied". The *point* being that the proper application of small forces yield HUGE results (i.e. Dessie vrs Hulk).
You *are* welcome.
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
814
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 22:25:00 -
[216] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Barbelo Valentinian wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:
So your argument that something cheaper shouldn't be able to do so much damage to something so much more expensive is actually very, very much wrong...
The argument fails in terms of "do serious damage to" or "cripple", but it doesn't necessarily fail in terms of "blowing the whole thing to smithereens". Ships in EVE are blown to smithereens, there's no such thing as "blow a hole in the side of" or "cripple". How much TNT would it take to actually totally blow up an entire oil tanker so that all that's left is a few bits of scrap metal? Asuri Kinnes wrote:(I hope you will agree that 14K pound of C4 or TNT, used appropriately, would destroy a tanker [i.e. - make it useless] just as few cheap-fit dessies can destroy [or make useless] a hulk) TBQH - From my time in the Navy, I could probably sink a tanker with much less than 14K pounds of C4.... Using shaped charges I could probably get by with 500 to 750 pounds alone... The thing is "appropriately applied". The *point* being that the proper application of small forces yield HUGE results (i.e. Dessie vrs Hulk). You *are* welcome. Properly placed thermite accomplishes the same feat with only 200 pounds.
It literally burns in water because it is self-oxidizing. It also literally burns through metal and just about everything else. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Conrad Makbure
Phoibe Enterprises
8
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 22:26:00 -
[217] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Many posts are appearing of late asking if the penalty for suicide-ganking is too low. From the gankees point of view, it probably is. They lost a ship. I will now put to you the other side of the argument. Suicide-gankers blow people up for many reasons. It may be for profit, in response to a player event or in many cases, they do it simply because it's fun[ny]. Now lets talk about penalties.
The gankee loses a ship & it's mods, plus whatever else resides in the cargohold. The ganker loses a ship & it's mods, whatever resides in the cargohold, sec status, gains a 15 minute GCC timer, can be shot by anyone for the duration & receives no insurance payout. Can you really say the penalties are too low?
The penalty for suicide ganking is just fine where its at there, ghostrider. No, there's noo need to change.
|

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
481
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 00:20:00 -
[218] - Quote
Conrad Makbure wrote:The penalty for suicide ganking is just fine where its at there, ghostrider. No, there's noo need to change.
Does that mean Ghostrider Awoxer'd Goose?
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Barbelo Valentinian
The Scope Gallente Federation
284
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 00:27:00 -
[219] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Barbelo Valentinian wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:
So your argument that something cheaper shouldn't be able to do so much damage to something so much more expensive is actually very, very much wrong...
The argument fails in terms of "do serious damage to" or "cripple", but it doesn't necessarily fail in terms of "blowing the whole thing to smithereens". Ships in EVE are blown to smithereens, there's no such thing as "blow a hole in the side of" or "cripple". How much TNT would it take to actually totally blow up an entire oil tanker so that all that's left is a few bits of scrap metal? In Eve Online we have wrecks.
Yeah, have you looked at a wreck recently? They're just some hunks of scrap metal, in no way resembling either the shape or even size of the original craft.
So my question to the knowledgeable person was, what would it take not just to sink a tanker or put it out of commission, but to actually blow the whole thing up to the analogue of a "wreck" in EVE - you know, what you have after you get the big 'splosion, the one with smithereens flying everywhere?  |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
1488
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 00:33:00 -
[220] - Quote
Excuse me.
Is this the thread for risk averse, combat frightened morons to cry about a mechanic that they are in no way required to participate in?
Let me just say this:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Mr Epeen  There is no excuse beyond fatalistic self-indulgence and sheer laziness for doing nothing --á Iain Banks |

Qvar Dar'Zanar
EVE University Ivy League
64
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 00:56:00 -
[221] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Excuse me. Is this the thread for risk averse, combat frightened morons to cry about a mechanic that they are in no way required to participate in? Let me just say this: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Mr Epeen 
I'm not sure if you're talking about the gankees or about the gankers. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1870
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:09:00 -
[222] - Quote
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Barbelo Valentinian wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:
So your argument that something cheaper shouldn't be able to do so much damage to something so much more expensive is actually very, very much wrong...
The argument fails in terms of "do serious damage to" or "cripple", but it doesn't necessarily fail in terms of "blowing the whole thing to smithereens". Ships in EVE are blown to smithereens, there's no such thing as "blow a hole in the side of" or "cripple". How much TNT would it take to actually totally blow up an entire oil tanker so that all that's left is a few bits of scrap metal? In Eve Online we have wrecks. Yeah, have you looked at a wreck recently? They're just some hunks of scrap metal, in no way resembling either the shape or even size of the original craft. So my question to the knowledgeable person was, what would it take not just to sink a tanker or put it out of commission, but to actually blow the whole thing up to the analogue of a "wreck" in EVE - you know, what you have after you get the big 'splosion, the one with smithereens flying everywhere? 
Depends how small the smithereens to which you require the ship to be blown are. If you want something small and consistant, no amount of explosives will do the job, it takes a wrecker (equivalent to reprocessing).
Wrecks in EvE can be looted and/or salvaged. Sunken or Wrecked ships in RL can be looted and/or salvaged.
The fact that EvE's visual representation of wrecks is some scraps of metal that don't vary with ship size points to the idea that they are not meant to be representative of how blown up the ship is. Once it's unfit for use, it's blown up and becomes a wreck. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
482
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:43:00 -
[223] - Quote
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:Yeah, have you looked at a wreck recently? They're just some hunks of scrap metal, in no way resembling either the shape or even size of the original craft. So my question to the knowledgeable person was, what would it take not just to sink a tanker or put it out of commission, but to actually blow the whole thing up to the analogue of a "wreck" in EVE - you know, what you have after you get the big 'splosion, the one with smithereens flying everywhere?  Real life analogies don't translate well to a video game, other than in broad strokes. Again, the point is, a very (relatively) cheap force, if applied correctly can cause great damage.
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Mallak Azaria
203
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 11:16:00 -
[224] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Barbelo Valentinian wrote:Yeah, have you looked at a wreck recently? They're just some hunks of scrap metal, in no way resembling either the shape or even size of the original craft. So my question to the knowledgeable person was, what would it take not just to sink a tanker or put it out of commission, but to actually blow the whole thing up to the analogue of a "wreck" in EVE - you know, what you have after you get the big 'splosion, the one with smithereens flying everywhere?  Real life analogies don't translate well to a video game, other than in broad strokes. Again, the point is, a very (relatively) cheap force, if applied correctly can cause great damage.
I know it's a bit of a taboo subject to some, but uhh... Al'qaeda understood that you can use cheap means to bring down something really expensive. Why can't these highsec miners who make themselves out to be very intelligent also understand this?
|

Rasmido
Liga Freier Terraner Ev0ke
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 12:07:00 -
[225] - Quote
Spikeflach wrote:Loss of any ship is no loss. They know its going to be lost, at the time they undock.
Corrected that for you. |

Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
671
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 12:46:00 -
[226] - Quote
The only problem with Suicide ganking is I can't shoot them first.

Move to low sec/null sec, and stop hiding in a place where you can't defend yourself!
The irony of High Sec is simple : "You are safe, but so is the guy trying to kill you! Mimidae Risk Solutions Recruiting |

Viktor Fyretracker
Emminent Terraforming
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 21:46:00 -
[227] - Quote
completely obliterating a ship at least in reality would take precision demolition. even a USN carrier could not turn a merchant vessel into something like an EVE wreck.... But the Mythbusters could.... remember the cement mixer... |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1879
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 21:51:00 -
[228] - Quote
Viktor Fyretracker wrote:completely obliterating a ship at least in reality would take precision demolition. even a USN carrier could not turn a merchant vessel into something like an EVE wreck.... But the Mythbusters could.... remember the cement mixer...
Carriers don't have much firepower. Assuming you meant a carrier air wing, they could easily blow something to smithereens over the course of emptying the magazines. Carriers hold a lot of munitions for their planes.
A battleship would also do pretty well, though you'd need target callers once the wreckage was strewn about.
The cement truck was the result of a confined explosion. Confined explosions do cool things. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Viktor Fyretracker
Emminent Terraforming
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 21:56:00 -
[229] - Quote
yes just imagine the explosion if one say.... Filled an entire oil tanker with that mining explosive. and I mean every tank right up to the top with bags of mining charges or AMFO... Now that would be an explosion. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1879
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 22:06:00 -
[230] - Quote
Viktor Fyretracker wrote:yes just imagine the explosion if one say.... Filled an entire oil tanker with that mining explosive. and I mean every tank right up to the top with bags of mining charges or AMFO... Now that would be an explosion.
At a certain point the initial detonation will start spreading the rest of the charge too far to detonate. It's the same problem that high yield nuclear warheads have. How to hold the thing together long enough to use all the available energy. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Cari Cullejen
Thukker Tribe Holdings Inc. Can't Undock. Won't Undock
8
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 23:11:00 -
[231] - Quote
Yes
Keep protecting those innocent defenseless asteroids from the evil hulks, coveters, and retrievers that roam the "high security" space... In love with CCP Sunset,-á+ëg velti ++v+¡ hvernig ++a+¦ er +í-á+ìslandi |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
488
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 23:15:00 -
[232] - Quote
Cari Cullejen wrote: "high security" space... Not "invulnerable..." Space...
Glad you were able to point that out to us...
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |