For my conclusion i would like to state that Tippa is the scum of the universe

Also suicide gankers suck

So what are we talking about now?

If you're going to do something, might as well do it right.


That's not a nice thing to say at all.

why they call them french fries when we all know it was Belgium that made them first...

Incorrect. That only means they are low skilled players who don't have what it takes to fight.

Tippia? More like Tippiowned, amirite?

For arguments sake lets assume [GǪ]

Then what? It would still actually be insignificant and meaningless being the oppinion of one person. Just you.

Besides, skipping the "what if"? You should read back a little. It's there.

Tippa (or whatever the **** her name is) drew all attention away from the original topic at every opportunity, drawing attention to how OP started his argument and how other people posting on this thread are misinterpreting words and ideals.

GǪso they mitigate the risks they have to take.

How do you manage not to get a very simple name right. It's six letters long and only uses four very distinct letters of the alphabet.

How do you manage not to get a very simple name right. It's six letters long and only uses four very distinct letters of the alphabet.

About that "mining is risk free"...

Drop is easier to pronounce and it fits better to your posts.

GǪand it is if you manage your risks. Until you do, gankers and the like provide the risk it should have.

No. You will read about suicide gankers and how local ruins EVE until you relent and remove them both, and you will like it.

Based on the responses to this topic alone I guess most people on this forum as of now disagree because the act of suicide ganking alone does not condemn other accomplishments.

That isn't true, the people that get killed, get kill rights on the gankers.

For PvP and like to encourage more of it? Or perhaps you are an industrialist with a specific focus in game not directly concerned with PvP skilling to be effective at your role and therefore ineffective to apply teeth in response to criminal activities?

Want to validate a potential Career path in GëívGëí with new income potential that is ideally designed as simply a transferance of ISK from one pilot to another?

Actually like situations where ships shoot back and "really" improve your KB resume as opposed to simply suprising soft industrial targets?

You agree that pilots should adapt to challenging situations in GëívGëí where acceptance of risk is an everyday seperator of those getting ahead on the curve, criminals included, to ensure the game evolves instead of being kept dumbed down?

Or simply want to make GëívGëí less boring with adding more fun and challenging gameplay elements?

Would like to see CCP finally correct a long standing broken mechanic in the game which at best provides an exploit for the effected criminal party to profit further from and yet has been left in the game still?

"It's going to be awesome."

"It's absolutley on the list of things to do."

"We have a spaceships game, but you can't be han solo or boba fett, that's not clever."

So yes they obviously like it safe if they are resistant to seeing the BH system repaired

I just want to say to high-sec miners :

MINE IN COVETOR!

No gankers will attack you and what will you lost? around 10% of yield
How far it is from a 300M hulk?
And if you loose it, that's the cost of one hour of veldspar mining!

Suicide gankers I have to agree are like little girls with a spreadsheet mentality to EVE achievements. But moreso pathetic that they operate under broken bounty hunter mechanics which would be one obvious nominal risk element afforded to the criminal contigent outside of their spreadsheet calulations, if it was actually effective. So yes they obviously like it safe if they are resistant to seeing the BH system repaired so an interesting analogy to draw about gamer mentalities even if the definition is indifferent to the purposes.

hey i am gonna post some magic psychology here, if i call them carebears they will stop ganking