Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
212
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:12:00 -
[31] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:sabre906 wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote:It is banning by other means. That breaks the entire purpose of having allies. I rather go back to the old system then, this is feature is useless if one cannot play with it and push its limits.n. Nothing's stopping you from bringing your "allies" into a mutual alliance. Or having your allies pony up the cash and wardec the aggressors themselves. Or any number of methods that involve actual allies, and not just highsec ganker corps who merely want cost-effective workarounds around having to pay a wardec fee themselves (which I imagine is what you actually want). Nothing prevents you from just fighting the abovementioned people and force them into submission. Indeed. But this isn't about what I can or cannot do, but about the balance of the wardec system.
Balance is achieved when you're on the right side of the blob? Is that why the defender having allies brings forth butthurt? Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |
sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
212
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:15:00 -
[32] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:sabre906 wrote:Aiwha wrote:Implying any nullsec group gives a damn about a bunch of highsec "pvpers". If goons like the Jita camp, they wouldn't be crying to nerf it. Just because I can't be bothered to type out a fresh reply, here's one I made earlier. Perhaps you haven't been around very long, or perhaps you don't frequent many other parts of the forum than GD, but you are terribly mistaken. There are certainly members of GS that behave less than prudently on the forums, but that is not to say that all of them behave in such a fashion. If you had bothered to do even the tiniest bit of research you would realise that, for the most part, the GS have made invaluable contributions to this game. Granted there have been some rather major and well publicised negative events involving GS members, but that should in no way over shadow the positive aspects of having GS around. Back in 2004-right through until the arrival of GS we were lumbered with an Alliance that was of the same relative size and power as GS, but who did little to bring about changes that would be of benefit to the masses. GS have, to the annoyance of some, brought about some very good changes to the game, prominent amongst those being the nerfing of Titans, and more recently their requests for Technetium to be redistributed more fairly. The majority of people crying on these forums are not members of GS, but rather those who have little to no understanding of GS, nor of their intentions, even though these intentions should be clear to most by now. Most of the GS members I see "crying" on the forums are actually being ironic, sarcastic or just plain in your face trolling, the laughable thing is that people seem to believe that they really are crying. What is actually happening is that people like you are jumping on the "hate them cos they're bigger than us, wah wah wah" bandwagon, while taking absolutely no time or effort to take a look at things for yourselves. I suggest you go and educate yourself on the "facts" lest you appear more foolish than you already do.
tl;dr:
GS -> "Goon" is like a bad word, so unspeakable it cannot be spelled out. Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1215
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:20:00 -
[33] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Balance is achieved when you're on the right side of the blob? Is that why the defender having allies brings forth butthurt? Only one who seems to be butthurt is you and your ilk, as is usual.
What's stopping a 2-3000 man alliance being brought in as a defenders' ally for 10M a week, by the way? Oh wait, it's that the defender would actually have to have an ally to do so. |
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:22:00 -
[34] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: balance
That word should be banned.
CCP does many things badly, but they are 8/10 or even 9/10 in balance. When they mess up, the usually fix it right.
My issue - again - is not balance.
Its the defacto ban on accessing a tool's full potential to derive entertainment value of said tool in a toolbox.
Lets say the cost of bringing an ally were twice the cost of the attacking
The problem I see with both sides of the "OMG BALANCE" tears is that they are both speaking out of their ass. There is real pew pew pew in highsec. There are people who want to do things like bait and switch.
Its not about poor carebears being able to hit back (which quite frankly they can even with this system). Or poor old Jade getting permawarred for overdoing the tinfoil headresses.
Its about the possibilities of the sandbox. Essentially a trillion isk to mount a massive battle ground means banning massive battles in highsec.
Also, the so-called problem of the "free loaders" gets solved by charging the same amount for an ally that a war would have charged them had they had the same amount of members. Make being an ally the same as declaring war.
But the maximum for declaring war is not a trillion isk or more, its half a billion, which is affordable to any corp that actually needs help at that massive scale.
Also, I wouldn't mind attackers being able to bring allies too. But I can live without it too. I am just saying, give us tools, not directions. Specially trillion isk directions. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1215
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:28:00 -
[35] - Quote
Crunchie Attuxors wrote: Its about the possibilities of the sandbox. Essentially a trillion isk to mount a massive battle ground means banning massive battles in highsec.
Where exactly are you getting this figure of "a trillion isk". It costs 10M + 10M*n^2 per ally. Which means you could bring on the 9000 pilot "Anti-Goonswarm Alliance" as an ally for 20M isk a week, or whatever.
So what 'possibilities' are being restricted? |
sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
212
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:31:00 -
[36] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote: Its about the possibilities of the sandbox. Essentially a trillion isk to mount a massive battle ground means banning massive battles in highsec.
Where exactly are you getting this figure of "a trillion isk". It costs 10M + 10M*n^2 per ally. Which means you could bring on the 9000 pilot "Anti-Goonswarm Alliance" as an ally for 20M isk a week, or whatever. So what 'possibilities' are being restricted?
How much would that 10+10M*n^2 work out for 100 90 pilot "Anti-Goonswarm Alliances?" Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1215
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:37:00 -
[37] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote: Its about the possibilities of the sandbox. Essentially a trillion isk to mount a massive battle ground means banning massive battles in highsec.
Where exactly are you getting this figure of "a trillion isk". It costs 10M + 10M*n^2 per ally. Which means you could bring on the 9000 pilot "Anti-Goonswarm Alliance" as an ally for 20M isk a week, or whatever. So what 'possibilities' are being restricted? How much would that 10+10M*n^2 work out for 100 90 pilot "Anti-Goonswarm Alliances?" Or do you mean little guys should dock up? Lots, so they should merge up if they're serious about their anti-Goon goal and not just indiscriminately looking for cost-effective workarounds to wardecs. |
Jayrendo Karr
Suns Of Korhal Terran Commonwealth
152
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:41:00 -
[38] - Quote
Attacking corps should just pay 1 million x member count for a wardec. Problem solved. |
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:48:00 -
[39] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote: Its about the possibilities of the sandbox. Essentially a trillion isk to mount a massive battle ground means banning massive battles in highsec.
Where exactly are you getting this figure of "a trillion isk". It costs 10M + 10M*n^2 per ally. Which means you could bring on the 9000 pilot "Anti-Goonswarm Alliance" as an ally for 20M isk a week, or whatever. So what 'possibilities' are being restricted?
It is my understanding of the formula is (at least in SiSi):
10m+(n*2) where n is the previous amount.
So first ally is free. Second ally is 10m [10m+(0*2)=10m]. Third ally is 30m [10m+(10*2)=30m], and so on.
Or for your perusal:
http://d35dgn2pdc8wsn.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Infernoallies.jpg
Am I getting the formula wrong?
Also, please read what I wrote. I take the goons at their word that highsec wardecing is of zero interest to them.
I think it is more possible for Eve Forum posters to stay on topic than for an Anti-Goonswarm Alliance being possible or necessary in Highsec. I am thinking more in the 20 corp range, hence trillion.
It is however of interest to merc/pvp and to "carebears with teeth" corps.
RvB vs E-UNI is the exception, not the rule, in highsec. The only way to have massive pew pew in hisec is wardec a shitload of corps with one of the few large hisec corps. Lets not make that impossible...
|
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 22:51:00 -
[40] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Lots, so they should merge up if they're serious about their anti-Goon goal and not just indiscriminately looking for cost-effective workarounds to wardecs.
Can you read?
Many of us give as much as a **** about goons as goons give a **** about us. We play different games that only intersect in interesting and creative ways like Burn Jita.
This is not about "balance" and this is not about "goons".
Read what it is about above in my several posts, including the OP.
|
|
Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
220
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 23:28:00 -
[41] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote: Its about the possibilities of the sandbox. Essentially a trillion isk to mount a massive battle ground means banning massive battles in highsec.
Where exactly are you getting this figure of "a trillion isk". It costs 10M + 10M*n^2 per ally. Which means you could bring on the 9000 pilot "Anti-Goonswarm Alliance" as an ally for 20M isk a week, or whatever. So what 'possibilities' are being restricted? How much would that 10+10M*n^2 work out for 100 90 pilot "Anti-Goonswarm Alliances?" Or do you mean little guys should dock up?
That is exactly what he means. |
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 23:36:00 -
[42] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote: That is exactly what he means.
Yeah of course. I take all this time making a coherent argument that explicitly places itself outside of the Dramabelisk, but I am part of the collective carebear butthurt and the tinfoil hat set.
Yeah...
|
sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
213
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 23:40:00 -
[43] - Quote
Crunchie Attuxors wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote: That is exactly what he means.
Yeah of course. I take all this time making a coherent argument that explicitly places itself outside of the Dramabelisk, but I am part of the collective carebear butthurt and the tinfoil hat set. Yeah...
The butthurt over Jita-camp is strong in this one. Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |
Ten Bulls
Sons of Olsagard
183
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 23:55:00 -
[44] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:also, a real sandbox would be all about removing CONCORD anything else is a compromise
It ceases to be a sandbox if there are toys in there ? |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1038
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 00:12:00 -
[45] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote: That is exactly what he means.
Yeah of course. I take all this time making a coherent argument that explicitly places itself outside of the Dramabelisk, but I am part of the collective carebear butthurt and the tinfoil hat set. Yeah... The butthurt over Jita-camp is strong in this one. Camped in Jita, huh.
At least yu can amuse yourself browsing the market there. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
Kimmi Chan
Illuminatus Reforged The Revenant Order
101
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 00:24:00 -
[46] - Quote
Crunchie Attuxors wrote:Yeah of course. I take all this time making a coherent argument that explicitly places itself outside of the Dramabelisk, but I am part of the collective carebear butthurt and the tinfoil hat set. Yeah...
I hate to say it but this is GD. Coherent arguments and coherent responses are kind of left at the door. It is unfortunate but is the way of things.
What I might suggest is perhaps abandoning this thread and have another go of it in the Warfare and Tactics forum. That forum is all about PvP including Empire Wars.
Alternatively, if you have ideas that you think would make the game more fun or viable you might try posting this in Features and Ideas.
To post in GD and expect civil discourse is like throwing steak in a pit of tigers and then telling them to go hungry.
-á"Miners mine so I don't have to." ~Metal Icarus |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1038
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 00:30:00 -
[47] - Quote
Crunchie Attuxors wrote:Yeah of course. I take all this time making a coherent argument that explicitly places itself outside of the Dramabelisk, but I am part of the collective carebear butthurt and the tinfoil hat set. Since we're discussing the wardec thing, I thought the "butthurt" was from the goons, not carebears? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
Jimmy Gunsmythe
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 00:30:00 -
[48] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:also, a real sandbox would be all about removing CONCORD anything else is a compromise
As Eve can never be a true sandbox, I wouldn't hold your breath. For the game to operate, you must have compromise. A good predator knows how to live in balance with his prey, lest he follow them into oblivion. |
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
9
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 01:30:00 -
[49] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote:Yeah of course. I take all this time making a coherent argument that explicitly places itself outside of the Dramabelisk, but I am part of the collective carebear butthurt and the tinfoil hat set. Since we're discussing the wardec thing, I thought the "butthurt" was from the goons, not carebears?
No idea. As I pointed out, goons in this thread have either only 2/10 trolled or been nice.
Wait. I see what you did here -.- |
Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
980
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 01:44:00 -
[50] - Quote
oh no jita decbears are preventing us from doing things
*logs in neutral alt* eh |
|
Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
124
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 02:25:00 -
[51] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:also, a real sandbox would be all about removing CONCORD anything else is a compromise
I second this motion
Crunchie Attuxors wrote: stuffs
I do like how they were all "come at me bro" then when ppl did, CCP changed it so that only technium holding giant sov corps could afford TO "come at" them. http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
9
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 02:25:00 -
[52] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:oh no jita decbears are preventing us from doing things
*logs in neutral alt*
Decbear?
What is next? Bearbear?
|
Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
124
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 02:40:00 -
[53] - Quote
As I remember from another thread its quadrillions or quintillions, cant remember but theres a lotta zeros http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1038
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 02:43:00 -
[54] - Quote
Crunchie Attuxors wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote:Yeah of course. I take all this time making a coherent argument that explicitly places itself outside of the Dramabelisk, but I am part of the collective carebear butthurt and the tinfoil hat set. Since we're discussing the wardec thing, I thought the "butthurt" was from the goons, not carebears? No idea. As I pointed out, goons in this thread have either only 2/10 trolled or been nice. Wait. I see what you did here -.- I'm actually not sure.
On second thought, were you talking about Jade Constantine's whining over the infinite allies for free forever nerf? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 02:45:00 -
[55] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Crunchie Attuxors wrote:Yeah of course. I take all this time making a coherent argument that explicitly places itself outside of the Dramabelisk, but I am part of the collective carebear butthurt and the tinfoil hat set. Since we're discussing the wardec thing, I thought the "butthurt" was from the goons, not carebears? No idea. As I pointed out, goons in this thread have either only 2/10 trolled or been nice. Wait. I see what you did here -.- I'm actually not sure. On second thought, were you talking about Jade Constantine's whining over the infinite allies for free forever nerf?
Yep. |
RAP ACTION HERO
94
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 03:17:00 -
[56] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Indeed. But this isn't about what I can or cannot do, but about the balance of the wardec system. Balance is achieved when you're on the right side of the blob? Is that why the defender having allies brings forth butthurt? Edit: Pyramid quoting removed - ISD Stensson
you still can, pay for it scrub |
Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
126
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 03:49:00 -
[57] - Quote
RAP ACTION HERO wrote:sabre906 wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Indeed. But this isn't about what I can or cannot do, but about the balance of the wardec system. Balance is achieved when you're on the right side of the blob? Is that why the defender having allies brings forth butthurt? Edit: Pyramid quoting removed - ISD Stensson you still can, pay for it scrub
Because apparently EVE isnt meant to be fair for the defenders but its fine if its fair for the attackers
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
2329
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 04:26:00 -
[58] - Quote
RAP ACTION HERO wrote:sabre906 wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Indeed. But this isn't about what I can or cannot do, but about the balance of the wardec system. Balance is achieved when you're on the right side of the blob? Is that why the defender having allies brings forth butthurt? Edit: Pyramid quoting removed - ISD Stensson you still can, pay for it scrub
Amusingly on tuesday to add the 46th defensive ally to the Star Fraction's wardec from the Goonswarm Federation its going to cost an estimated 702 Quintillion ISK. I wasn't even sure how to write that in numbers before I checked google.
Apparently it's something like 702,000,000,000,000,000,000 ISK.
Some amusing facts:
1. Default price of the Goonswarm vs SF wardec is 50m isk. 2. One of my corp mates is one of the richest individuals in Eve online and in addition to holdings in blueprints, titan parts and whatnots his ambition this year was to exceed half a trillion in liquid isk in the current account. If he achieves this lofty ambition (and if he gave me his wallet) we'd be able to sustain our defensive wardecs in Incarna 1.1 for approximately 1.5 minutes before going irrevocably broke. 3. I believe that (fiscally speaking) this is probably the most extreme nerf of anything in the history of Eve Online.
Sometimes you really have to laugh :)
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom Epic Inferno Wardec Test, Sign up and shoot Goons for free! |
Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
224
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 04:55:00 -
[59] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Translation?
EVE is a crab bucket
|
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
11
|
Posted - 2012.06.17 16:58:00 -
[60] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:
3. I believe that (fiscally speaking) this is probably the most extreme nerf of anything in the history of Eve Online.
I don't agree with a lot of what you have said on this topic, but on this we agree. Its a mechanic breaking nerf.
Basically they introduced something, and then instead of tweaking it, they are breaking it to the point that the reason for it existing disappears.
It is basically worse than the previous mechanic. Not an improvement, but the opposite.
I do not understand how CCP could punch it in, in such a dimwitted way.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |