| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Corelin
Sons Of 0din
   |
Posted - 2010.07.08 16:08:00 -
[121]
Less Filling AND Tastes Great
|
Mynxee
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 18:24:00 -
[122]
I have bookmarked this proposal and will carefully review it for potentially raising in a future CSM meeting. I realize it is well supported and has been around for a little bit, but I haven't had time to read it and form an opinion nor do the research to see what similar proposals might already have been addressed by CSM. That's why it's not on my list of proposals to raise for this Saturday's CSM meeting.
Life In Low Sec |
Imiarr Timshae
Caldari
Funny Men In Funny Hats
|
Posted - 2010.07.18 14:50:00 -
[123]
 Originally by: Mynxee
I have bookmarked this proposal and will carefully review it for potentially raising in a future CSM meeting. I realize it is well supported and has been around for a little bit, but I haven't had time to read it and form an opinion nor do the research to see what similar proposals might already have been addressed by CSM. That's why it's not on my list of proposals to raise for this Saturday's CSM meeting.
I very much appreciate this.
The consistant approval of this proposal by the vast majority of people posting here suggests to me that drone options are sorely wanted, even if not in this particular iteration.
If you do decide to bring it up, please contact me ingame and I will put together a short presentation for you outlining what I'd like done; primarily the contents of this post, but also other additional options (Prefer size, prefer velocity, prefer nearest etc).
My thanks again, and thanks to all for the ongoing support!
-----
Originally by: GM Horse
Remember kids, both meth and macro use are Really Quite Bad Things.
Originally by: CCP Shadow
Tragic smelting accidents.
|
siC0 b0b
|
Posted - 2010.07.18 20:00:00 -
[124]
ehm... this is ****, just do it yourself don't be so ****ing lazy, how's this helping anyone
just bind the drone attack button and use it, i don't get this, it won't work in a bilion years
even if this stupid idea will ever get implemented, it'll only add more lag and you'll be better off assigning drones manualy anyway since it doesn't take any time to press a combination of two buttons and no AI is going to be better
really, people who thumbs up this never heard of key bindings, are seriously lazy and for them playing the game means staring at the screen or they just want annother buggy feature to complain about, because i can tell you right now, it won't work as you see it in your little head, even if it did it wouldn't replace binding drone attack, ever
|
Jahpahjay
|
Posted - 2010.07.20 16:23:00 -
[125]
You can say it's being lazy that I want to be able to effectively and efficiently control and program my drones to do what I want them to do, but that's what they are: automated robots.
What's wrong with setting them up to have greater functionality and less stress? They're already the most vulnerable weapon type in eve, what's wrong with at least making them do what you want them to do while they're there? Would it create more lag? Possibly. But so does somebody spamming whatever hotkey they're using to get the drones to engage the correct target, which can avoided using this method.
And did I mention less stress? What's wrong with being able to enjoy the game that much more?
Anyway, the idea gets my full support mainly because the more options there are to counter falcons and other ewar ships, the better 
|
SlayerOfArgus
Hermes Enterprises
|
Posted - 2010.07.21 02:22:00 -
[126]
Dear god yes please. Drone UI is terribad....
|
klyeme
Soft War
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2010.07.23 03:02:00 -
[127]
Also have your ship keep track of the drones that you left behind so you can warp to them and scoop them. Something like the drones in distant space, that for most ships has no use. This idea is great 
|
Sangroku
|
Posted - 2010.07.23 12:28:00 -
[128]
Edited by: Sangroku on 23/07/2010 12:28:28
I support this. |
Kai Lomu
|
Posted - 2010.07.23 15:55:00 -
[129]
Fully supported
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |