EVE Search - Mass-Testing 2.0 - Summer 2010 Expansion edition

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Mass-Testing 2.0 - Summer 2010 Expansion edition

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 16 post(s)
SlayerOfArgus Gallente For The Booze	Posted - 2010.03.03 18:37:00 - [61] Why was a test announced pretty much an hour after it was supposed to start?
Dsan Smegnet Corp	Posted - 2010.03.03 18:54:00 - [62] was asked to go here and request a fresh mirror update before the mass testing, i think it would motivate a lot of people to come join the testing. also you would probably get a LOT more capital pilots if you did it. there has to be someone that trained them over the past 1 quater of a year... considder this, since last mirror was made, Goonswarm has disbanded... what does that say about the mirror ?
Mahai Ano Gallente Center for Advanced Studies	Posted - 2010.03.03 18:54:00 - [63] Damn, announce it at least a couple of DAYS before you decide on a mass test. Don't you want to have people helping you?
Alchemist's Alt Gallente Hysteria Nexus	Posted - 2010.03.03 19:12:00 - [64] Was a fun test, I had fun the sleeper invasion was pretty impressive had a chance to risk ships I dont generally like to undock in. kindda screwed up my sleep today so I was like feeling tired and falling asleep, sent a message to a corpy saying "aww im tired cya" a second later over 9000 sleeper drones appear, it was like a mass caffeine boost, the downfall was the char I wanted to come with sadly didnt have certain skills trained to be useful :( Also message to some of the rawr guys, chill out FIRST!!
Kyra Felann Gallente	Posted - 2010.03.03 19:37:00 - [65] Wow, I didn't know about this until it was already over. It went like this: Wake up Check mail and RSS feeds See info about test today Excited, since I normally can't make it on Saturdays Read the time, which was two hours ago
StarLite Amarr Kingfisher Industries Halcyonidae	Posted - 2010.03.03 19:52:00 - [66] I missed this, and I even have the CCP News in my RSS reader... O_o _______________________________________________________________________ This sig is guarded by SigGuard(c)

CCP Tanis	Posted - 2010.03.03 19:55:00 - [67] FYI, results from the first test are now online! http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1278810 ____________________________ I break thingsÖ CCP Tanis - EVE Quality Assurance\|EVE Live Team CCP Games

Tonto Auri Vhero' Multipurpose Corp	Posted - 2010.03.03 22:59:00 - [68] Edited by: Tonto Auri on 03/03/2010 22:59:48 -- Thanks CCP for cu
Amberlamps	Posted - 2010.03.04 12:26:00 - [69] Originally by: CCP Tanis ...instead of waiting for "better timing". I guess that means you can give Sisi the "new" mirror which is now out dated by nearly a month. I'm surprised you guys haven't realised a new mirror would give a huge boost to people logging on, or you have realise that but just not bothered to act on it. At the least you give a reasonable reason for why there isn't a new mirror rather than waiting for a better time. We're paying a monthly sub for a game... we spend our time helping you "fix" the game... we still pay for the game with no bonus. Why not drop faction ships into everyone's hangar again on Sisi? Everyone going OMGWTFBBQ I can haz cheeseburger nao!
Slade Hoo Amarr Corpse Collection Point	Posted - 2010.03.04 12:49:00 - [70] Originally by: Amberlamps Why not drop faction ships into everyone's hangar again on Sisi? Because it ruins gaming experience. ------ Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum!

eiedu	Posted - 2010.03.04 14:35:00 - [71] Please vid the performances so people that can't join in see the progress but mostly for stunning sights for potential promo vids :)?
Merasa Tro	Posted - 2010.03.04 15:41:00 - [72] Whilst its great you provide feedback on the results of the testing.. Thought occured that perhaps you're providing too much info for those looking for exploits? Previously you've said that when you experience lag jumping in, do nothing. As chat, market, etc makes it worse. So what do people do? They spam chat to increase load for those jumping in. Now you've said dropping/picking up fleet increases load. Isn't that a hint to people WANTING to lag out a node to start forming/swapping/dropping fleets to deliberatly lag out the node? You're kind of stuck in the rock-hard place. Tell us, people exploit it, dont tell us, people whine it.
Brokers Clone	Posted - 2010.03.04 16:44:00 - [73] Yea, A test scheduled for Wed, at Noon EST Yes siree, lots of people will make that... yup
Hun Jakuza Octavian Vanguard	Posted - 2010.03.05 08:46:00 - [74] A real mass test on TQ : http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=5954169 Result : Never loading grid after titan bridge and die. Pilot info panel loading completed, chat load done, broadcast messages fine. Just the game unplayable because Dominion grid load bug.
Ban Doga	Posted - 2010.03.05 19:05:00 - [75] Edited by: Ban Doga on 05/03/2010 19:07:44 Originally by: CCP Tanis FYI, results from the first test are now online! http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1278810 Are there no results from the earlier tests or did I just miss them? Specifically I mean http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1238523 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1257152 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1261686 Originally by: CCP Tanis Also, the test today was announced on such short notice because we wanted to get a potential fix into testing ASAP so that it can get out to TQ faster, instead of waiting several days. We figured you folks would rather we keep trying to fix things instead of waiting for "better timing". Looking at the results - IMO it's merely a summary of the individual experiences, nothing anyone who participated didn't know already - I have the impression that after 2 months of testing you are still trying to find the actual problem, instead of trying to develop a solution to it. So are there any fixes already, some changes or ideas that were derived from the test result(s)?
Everseeker Caldari Northgate	Posted - 2010.03.05 19:24:00 - [76] Originally by: CCP Tanis Howdy Folks, [Update: Added new test for Wed March 3 to test a potential fix before deployment to TQ] ...stuff... Couple Questions: 1. How did the "fix test" go? 2. If good, Deploying to TQ soon? 3. Will the upcoming test be a second look at the fix, or will you be looking... deeper 4. So, About that swarm -o- Sleepers... Do it again? -- EverSeeker
Wastelander Miccey	Posted - 2010.03.06 10:11:00 - [77] Hmm...I cant log in to Singularity with my current character. I dwloaded the singu and installed to diffrent location, fire up the game and try to log in with my CURRENT character login and password..It says its wrong..So how do i do this??
Commander TGK Gallente The Deep Space Armada Rising Phoenix Alliance	Posted - 2010.03.06 23:01:00 - [78] CCP you had the test scheduled too early, most of us here in the US were still sleeping seeing as how it was a saturday morning. You'd get a better turnout if you did it at 20:00 GMT or later like the previous test.
Everseeker Caldari Northgate	Posted - 2010.03.08 19:02:00 - [79] What, NOON is too early? Hmmm.... if you're on the left coast, it's 9 AM. and that IS a wee bit early for a Saturday.... Personally, I had a commitment (of the Spousal aggro kind) But I see that the event was postponed... What happened? No one came? -- EverSeeker
HeliosGal Caldari	Posted - 2010.03.09 03:32:00 - [80] move ahead as required with testing Signature - CCP what this game needs is more variance in PVE aspects and a little bit less PVP focus, more content more varied level 1-4 missions more than just 10 per faction high sec low sec and 00

Caia Gallente The Scope	Posted - 2010.03.09 07:42:00 - [81] Quote: What, NOON is too early? Yes, by about 3 hours.
HeliosGal Caldari	Posted - 2010.03.10 02:28:00 - [82] at least they are pressing ahead Signature - CCP what this game needs is more variance in PVE aspects and a little bit less PVP focus, more content more varied level 1-4 missions more than just 10 per faction high sec low sec and 00
Tibeirus	Posted - 2010.03.13 13:24:00 - [83] Honestly, I have to applaud CCP for diverting from the normal testing times they have done in the past that virtually exclude US time zone participation. My only real question is will I be able to login to the test server for the test, or will it be the standard sitting in the login que for hours?
Reeno Coleman	Posted - 2010.03.14 08:39:00 - [84] I have a suggestion for the upcoming test As i'm a software developer too, I spend half my day with bugspray in hand. I tend to look at features that behave awkwardly or dont work very well first. Given I was there with the last tests and didn't notice any particular use of my favorite feature, I would suggest you test it explicitly. Do an extra test where you ask all ppl to fill their watchlists randomly! Why? I can't imagine people do this by themselves during a test. It's a vital part of fleetfights. This feature is not part of the native code and has been "hacked in" afterwards The watchlist often behaves odd. E.g. the red flashing during attacks is mostly wrong, or not there if needed There is a lot of information transferred additionaly. Given the non-native implementation i would guess this is not done very efficiently
Colporter	Posted - 2010.03.14 11:23:00 - [85] I have managed to 'cut down' my portion of the lag by using Piriforms CCleaner with 'Wipe Free Space' checked. It takes about 2 to 3 hours to complete and has been a substantial help on my computer when I play EVE. Here is a link to their website, Help Section. Colporter
Jamus Gorrelius Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2010.03.15 11:09:00 - [86] This incredibal lag was a direct effect on the dominion expansion, we had 100 in local last night and it was unplayable, targets that were dead were still there, loading into system took forever, is enough hard work and resources being put into this? I don't think so, they need to go through the code for dominion, look at the fleets finder, loot logger and watch list, these all seem to free lag when they are not active. Ive tested in system when in fleet and when not in fleet and the difference in lag is huge. Also look at the sov system, this has gone on too long and realy needs to be sorted.
Berenices Herculina Gallente Center for Advanced Studies	Posted - 2010.03.16 11:33:00 - [87] Originally by: Colporter I have managed to 'cut down' my portion of the lag by using Piriforms CCleaner with 'Wipe Free Space' checked. It takes about 2 to 3 hours to complete and has been a substantial help on my computer when I play EVE. Here is a link to their website, Help Section. Colporter We aren't talking about graphics lag caused by your crappy PC or lack of RAM of your crappy PC or lack of CPU of your crappy PC here...see where I am going? It's about the hamsters in the server cluster... You can have stable high FPS in fight involving 1000 pilots, but your module lag is counted in minutes - that's the 'lag' what we are talking here.
Msquare	Posted - 2010.03.19 16:04:00 - [88] Ahhh... A fresh Mirror. Not 100% sure, but seems less than a week old. And a 2Gb "patch". I'll ry and be there.
Giselda	Posted - 2010.03.20 14:26:00 - [89] Having this at the top of the newsfeed today might have informed a few more folks of the time and encouraged them to log on. It took a bit of searching to find this info today.
Giselda	Posted - 2010.03.21 01:47:00 - [90] Thanks for adding this to the newsfeed in time for folks to get there! My null sec main had fun - lots of pew pew with accompanying lag - hope test results were good!



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.