Maybe like a special pos bashing module and subsystem for t3?

Something like this would spice up low class wormholes nicely as well. Especially c4's that are far enough from k-space to discourage invaders from ferrying large BC/BS fleets in but also immune to capital ships, so in c4's horribly fluffy carebears can keep their failfit poses up infinitely, since no one ever bothers to attack them there. In c5's we have cleaning crews removing failbears with dreadnoughts and c1-c3 have k-space logistics for invading smaller ships.

The idea has some merit. Let us investigate it further.

They took the risk/reward gamble of WH space and they lost it, and now they have the option to take the wimp's way out when the aggressing pilots have usually taken lost of time to set up the appropriate fleet and laid in wait for the appropriate time. They take the cowards way out, and now there will be no record of them ever being in that ship during said fight and only the pod will be proof.

Yes they did, and they lost an expensive piece of hardware in the process.
Please keep crying over killmails you don't deserve, your tears are delicious [read: pathetic]

What function does this post serve?

You's Trollin' [read: pathetic]

Fight fire with fire.

Yes they did, and they lost an expensive piece of hardware in the process.
Please keep crying over killmails you don't deserve, your tears are delicious [read: pathetic]

I still don't get why you are opposed to something reflecting accurately on a battle report. But if you really only want half the story to be shown, just say so.

popping wormhole PoSes is too easy, they don't have the coordination or the ability to bring in reinforcements like null does. In null you can fall back to another system, in wormholes your just ******

if popping poses in wormholes was profitable in any way other then "i want this system"

then too many people would just run around ganking wormholes and then wormhole content would die

cry moar bitches but CCP wants people to have fun

(...) just passive-aggressive deny the killers their trophy' that don't want.

popping wormhole PoSes is too easy, they don't have the coordination or the ability to bring in reinforcements like null does. In null you can fall back to another system, in wormholes your just ******

if popping poses in wormholes was profitable in any way other then "i want this system"

then too many people would just run around ganking wormholes and then wormhole content would die

cry moar bitches but CCP wants people to have fun

Nut up or shut up.
People who SD in combat are the lowest form of coward in EVE.

Because you did NOT kill it, it exploded at the expressed and delayed decision of the pilot.

I can't think of how to write this out any easier for you... erm.

Your ship blew up because I shot at it, a battle happened, you lost.
Regardless of what made your ship explode, it still exploded because I agressed it.

I am yet to hear a good reason there should be no record of this...

"You did not kill it" is not a good reason because it is wrong. I killed it, it is dead because of me, who cares if you got the final blow.

Rather than justify why I should have a killmail, I think it'd be better to hear the reasons you should be able to deny someone one, or why you would want to?

I'm betting almost everyone who thinks they deserve to deny a killmail does so out of 1 of 2 reasons (neither are valid)

1: Spite - your spite is not a valid game mechanic, you are the type of person that turns off a multiplayer right before the results and act like noone won because you turned it off...

2: Killboard - you don't want the loss, and wish to pretend like it didn't happen (even though it did)

That about right?

Killing (& baking stuff) is what this game is all about, self destruction is for cowards IMO, If they failed to protect their vessels they deserve to die.