| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
15
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
due your repetable failures
This is not about nerfing tech, this is about injecting sooo much isk in an alliance by broken game mechannics that it is impossible to counter them in several arms races. Resulting in several things:
Unlimited reimbursent power; -Basicly this gives the abillity to suicie fleet after fleet to ware the oppoment isk pool down.
Unlimited capital ship buying power; -Abllity to fully fund allaince super capitals and reimburse them and not getting an financial injury when losing.
Strenghten the individual corporations of a tech alliance more -By having lots of isk for those corps they are able to purchase more and better support for there members. Think hereby about setting up logi chains with corp JF's, hireing FC's and free roaming ship reimbursements.
Giving those alliances a better moral and a better pubic image due more isk -Good FC's tend to join such allaices as they are getting payed in isk and getting their ships fully reimbursed. This creates a chain of affects that boost internal alli moral (more stuff/roams to do) and increases overall public image
Exellent Alliance Recruitment -Those allainces can take in more and better corps due promising them isk every month. Why shouldnt join an allaince that reimburse all your losses freely, hands out free supers and payes you 10-20b a month for just being there...
This is an armsrace that will effects eve for a long long time. Due poor game desighn and repeatable negection of serious issues like this i come to the conclusion that you have learned nothing so far CCP. The only way to fix this a little bit is insta removing tech from tech moons and NPC seed it at current prices untill ringmining is introduced. The excess isk gained should be removed to a level thats acceptable, something thats upto you to decide. The biggest reson for this to do it now is due ISK stocking. When the amount of isk that an allaice gains is soo high that they can save up 500 billion isk a month, something must be serious wrong. When an alliance has over 10 Trillion in savings and gaining another 500 billion a month something is not right.... Expecialy when it is publicly known that CCP employees have high ranks in that allaince. A serious Public Image Threat for you marketing department and your customer base. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
791
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Rene Fullchest
Sigillum Militum Xpisti Fatal Ascension
32
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
120
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
i wondered what the next excuse would be. |

Jonah Gravenstein
577
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
TL;DR
Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it.
Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Time Funnel
Ars ex Discordia Test Alliance Please Ignore
166
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
forestwho wrote: This is an armsrace that will effects eve for a long long time. Due poor game desighn and repeatable negection of serious issues like this i come to the conclusion that you have learned nothing so far CCP. The only way to fix this a little bit is insta removing tech from tech moons and NPC seed it at current prices untill ringmining is introduced. The excess isk gained should be removed to a level thats acceptable, something thats upto you to decide. The biggest reson for this to do it now is due ISK stocking. When the amount of isk that an allaice gains is soo high that they can save up 500 billion isk a month, something must be serious wrong. When an alliance has over 10 Trillion in savings and gaining another 500 billion a month something is not right.... Expecialy when it is publicly known that CCP employees have high ranks in that allaince. A serious Public Image Threat for you marketing department and your customer base.
I agreed with you up until you offered your solution. The correct solution in a sandbox game is to change the rules of the sandbox not to artificially inject things into the market for reasons of "stability" or "fairness". For the entire life of EVE there have been massive imbalances in the game mechanics. Perhaps the game mechanics can be balanced and iterated on in a way that makes things better and does not create another super imbalance like Tech did. The fact that Tech has not been balanced in 4? years simply blows my mind. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
120
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork: 
i think the point the op was trying to make is that they've had it that long they're too well resourced/dug in/whatever.
which just makes me wonder why nobody tried to do any thing sooner? |

dexington
Lysergic.acid.diethylamide
30
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1.
Judging from the public opinion on the forum, you are better off staying in empire. The 0.0 population use to much time complaining about how bad everything is in 0.0, empire seem like a nice place why would anyone leave?
Living in empire means more time to shoot at red dots and less time complaining on the forums, and you don't have to take part in the space politics, which seems to be mostly posting on the forums about how great you corp/alliance is, and how terrible everyone else is.
There is probably only two ways to get 10% to leave empire space, the carrot or the whip. Seeing how there is nothing that comes close to being a carrot, nothing is happening unless ccp nerf empire space to hell. |

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
57
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Confirming that tech moons are mined for pure isk, and not technetium. "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

Victoria Sin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:36:00 -
[10] - Quote
I just think the tech should move around. I don't like the idea of fixed assets at fixed locations at all. Tech needs to fade out of one region and fade into another over time. Then you'll see a more dynamic null-sec. |

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
57
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:38:00 -
[11] - Quote
Victoria Sin wrote:I just think the tech should move around. I don't like the idea of fixed assets at fixed locations at all. Tech needs to fade out of one region and fade into another over time. Then you'll see a more dynamic null-sec.
This is what happens when npc corp alts of high sec carebears suggest changes to null sec mechanics. "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

Dersk
90040045
84
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
forestwho wrote:This is not about nerfing tech, this is about injecting sooo much isk in an alliance by broken game mechannics that it is impossible to counter them in several arms races.
So that explains why no one could dislodge alliances like Morsus Mihi, White Noise., Raiden., RAZOR, and Mostly Harmless from their tech moons. I was wondering. |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
139
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 14:50:00 -
[13] - Quote
Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it.
Don't say we. You are no Goon, you are a lowly pet. There was no we, Goons fought for it and took it. Your masters just threw you a bone as condolences for all the rug burns on your knees.
Also Goons give themselves more credit than they deserve. They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. Goons would of never been able to beat BOB in a normal war, and they know that too. If they thought for even a second they could win they wouldn't have destroyed BOB in one fell swoop with no shots fired. Why take away your biggest target if you think you can beat them? Because they knew they had zero chance. |

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
790
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tell me more about how SoCo works, oh NPC alt forum warrior. (PS. I'm sorry you would get fined for posting with your main.) Why did you take my wings away? |

AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
299
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:02:00 -
[15] - Quote
No one believed that BoB could be taken down, and then someone did a left click of a mouse and proved them wrong.
Null sec should have elements worth fighting for. So, the problem is not the elements, but the fact that no one has the balls to take it for themselves.
That, is EVE.
Only difference is that BoB actually had the respect and the money, instead of just the money.
When you really look at the facts; Goonswarm do not have anything of value.
AK GÇ£You go into combat, and itGÇÖs NOT going to be WagnerGǪindustrial techno or really hard drum and bassGÇ¥ Reynir Hardarson, founding member of CCP Games, 2002.
somethingjustgotreal.com |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
139
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:02:00 -
[16] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:Tell me more about how SoCo works, oh NPC alt forum warrior. (PS. I'm sorry you would get fined for posting with your main.)
Oh did I make the Goon lap dog angry? Know how I know you're angry? When people get angry and have no real argument they like to point out that I am in an NPC corp.
AlleyKat wrote:No one believed that BoB could be taken down, and then someone did a left click of a mouse and proved them wrong.
BoB was never 'taken down' really. No one ever beat them in a war. They got infiltrated, robbed and disbanded. To think a second person would ever do something as stupid as give director roles to an enemy is delusional. I don't understand how it happened just one time. But I assure you the Goons are not going to make the same mistake. Using BoB as an example of how big alliances fall is not a good example. |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc Exhale.
133
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:04:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP need to properly balance tech distribution
but wont / promises to, but it'll be one of those things we dont see for two years
what else is new |

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
790
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
Exactly like your "winning by never undocking," I am "angry." Why did you take my wings away? |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
992
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:04:00 -
[19] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:KrakizBad wrote:Tell me more about how SoCo works, oh NPC alt forum warrior. (PS. I'm sorry you would get fined for posting with your main.) Oh did I make the Goon lap dog angry? Know how I know you're angry? When people get angry and have no real argument they like to point out that I am in an NPC corp.
You also have really bad opinions. Does that count as a "real argument?" |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
992
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:05:00 -
[20] - Quote
AlleyKat wrote:Only difference is that BoB actually had the respect and the money, instead of just the money.
BoB. Respect?
Ow. My sense of irony just sprained itself. |

Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris Etherium Cartel
228
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:Victoria Sin wrote:I just think the tech should move around. I don't like the idea of fixed assets at fixed locations at all. Tech needs to fade out of one region and fade into another over time. Then you'll see a more dynamic null-sec. This is what happens when npc corp alts of high sec carebears suggest changes to null sec mechanics. Just curious, but why do you think that? I have long believed that having the moon-goo fade in and out in waves would absolutely create a more dynamic null-sec landscape as the movement of scarce and limited veins would likely create a moving front-line as alliances are constantly on the go, ravaging an area for it's natural resources and then moving on.
no? |

stoicfaux
1219
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:14:00 -
[22] - Quote
Capitalism will save the day! Some team of bright engineers/chemists/scientists will create synthetic tech or create a generic equivalent or find a way to synthesize tech from other elements.
Similar to how DeBeers created a world-wide monopoly on diamonds, increasing prices on diamonds to artificially high levels, until people figured out how to grow perfect diamonds in the lab.
Also, wealth and power tends to attract egos. Politics tends to bring down even the best and most established organizations.
You can tell me what is and isn't Truth when you pry the tinfoil from my cold, lifeless head.
|

Spurty
D00M. Northern Coalition.
293
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:14:00 -
[23] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1.
And do what? They are not even able to replace their own ships in less than a week of grinding missions.
If you're not holding tech (just need to be blue to someone that does to meet that criteria) you're not going to do anything more than dream.
Seems that's all high sec people want mind you so don't see any point in changes made to the game.
Only changes that could rewire high sex people are things like :
- pirate modules and implants in null sec. Take them To high sec / low sec and get fined - faction modules only allowed in that factions space unless you're in fw where you are have to adjust your behavior
There is no need to come to null sec while everything minus the headaches is available at any market hub.
Jita is a massive blanket of comfort
Not sure why everyone wants to fight over null sec ... People camping Jita undock / gates are ahead of the curve with regards to effort / risk / reward
Holding tech doesn't affect them. Only concern they have is that Jita doesn't get it's trillions of ISK brought in / out every few hours
---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
994
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 15:57:00 -
[24] - Quote
Spurty wrote: Not sure why everyone wants to fight over null sec ... People camping Jita undock / gates are ahead of the curve with regards to effort / risk / reward
Holding tech doesn't affect them. Only concern they have is that Jita doesn't get it's trillions of ISK brought in / out every few hours
Sure, if by effort and risk/reward you mean sitting there like a lump, waiting for people to be vulnerable while their client freezes and blanks out during undock, so you can kill them without any chance of them fighting back. "Leet Highsec PVP" I guess, but it doesn't hold a candle to anything in Nullsec.
Also, I think you're vastly mistaken re: Tech profits. If you got 7000 players together and had them doing something in highsec, like say, mission running, or Ice botting, or crafting ships or something, you'd see similar profits. Tech is just what Goons "do" right now, because of a lucky happenstance with Goon space and moon goo.
The only way to really shuffle this around would be to force CCP to disband Goonswarm and the CFC, and hahaha, even NewCCP wouldn't dare. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
15
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:07:00 -
[25] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork: 
Cant if the current holders buys corps, strenght and has untimited reimbursement powers. Read my post properly pls
Xython wrote:
Also, I think you're vastly mistaken re: Tech profits. If you got 7000 players together and had them doing something in highsec, like say, mission running, or Ice botting, or crafting ships or something, you'd see similar profits. Tech is just what Goons "do" right now, because of a lucky happenstance with Goon space and moon goo.
Moonmining is 99% afk job once you have the establischment (blues) to defend them. Only need to fuel the tower and scoop out the goo 3 times a month and ship it to jita from time to time. Ppl maybe x up 1% of their monthy playing time to defend it myabe once in holdership....
Dersk wrote:forestwho wrote:This is not about nerfing tech, this is about injecting sooo much isk in an alliance by broken game mechannics that it is impossible to counter them in several arms races. So that explains why no one could dislodge alliances like Morsus Mihi, White Noise., Raiden., RAZOR, and Mostly Harmless from their tech moons. I was wondering.
0.0 politics are complicated, you saying that tells me you know nothing about it and allaince inner structures & it strengts and weaknesses and all sorts that is related to that.... pls move on |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
141
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:08:00 -
[26] - Quote
Xython wrote:Spurty wrote: Not sure why everyone wants to fight over null sec ... People camping Jita undock / gates are ahead of the curve with regards to effort / risk / reward
Holding tech doesn't affect them. Only concern they have is that Jita doesn't get it's trillions of ISK brought in / out every few hours
Also, I think you're vastly mistaken re: Tech profits. If you got 7000 players together and had them doing something in highsec, like say, mission running, or Ice botting, or crafting ships or something, you'd see similar profits. Tech is just what Goons "do" right now, because of a lucky happenstance with Goon space and moon goo. T
The difference is there are not 7000 people mining moon goo. I don't how many people exactly you have tending to POS but I am sure it's just a small handful. A handful of people making the same amount of isk (almost completely passively may I add) as 7000 people actively running missions or mining ice.
|

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
994
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:10:00 -
[27] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Cant if the current holders buys corps, strenght and has untimited reimbursement powers. Read my post properly pls Xython wrote:
Also, I think you're vastly mistaken re: Tech profits. If you got 7000 players together and had them doing something in highsec, like say, mission running, or Ice botting, or crafting ships or something, you'd see similar profits. Tech is just what Goons "do" right now, because of a lucky happenstance with Goon space and moon goo.
Moonmining is 99% afk job once you have the establischment (blues) to defend them. Only need to fuel the tower and scoop out the goo 3 times a month and ship it to jita from time to time. Ppl maybe x up 1% of their monthy playing time to defend it myabe once in holdership....
You have no idea what you are talking about and are too ignorant to bother trying to educate. Go away. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
15
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:14:00 -
[28] - Quote
Why cause this is a serious issue that is serious broken and that is affecting your income? |

Gorinia Sanford
Sons of Russ
21
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:15:00 -
[29] - Quote
forestwho wrote:due your repetable failures
This is not about nerfing tech, this is about injecting sooo much isk in an alliance by broken game mechannics that it is impossible to counter them in several arms races. Resulting in several things:
Unlimited reimbursent power; -Basicly this gives the abillity to suicie fleet after fleet to ware the oppoment isk pool down.
Unlimited capital ship buying power; -Abllity to fully fund allaince super capitals and reimburse them and not getting an financial injury when losing.
Strenghten the individual corporations of a tech alliance more -By having lots of isk for those corps they are able to purchase more and better support for there members. Think hereby about setting up logi chains with corp JF's, hireing FC's and free roaming ship reimbursements.
Giving those alliances a better moral and a better pubic image due more isk -Good FC's tend to join such allaices as they are getting payed in isk and getting their ships fully reimbursed. This creates a chain of affects that boost internal alli moral (more stuff/roams to do) and increases overall public image
Exellent Alliance Recruitment -Those allainces can take in more and better corps due promising them isk every month. Why shouldnt join an allaince that reimburse all your losses freely, hands out free supers and payes you 10-20b a month for just being there...
This is an armsrace that will effects eve for a long long time. Due poor game desighn and repeatable negection of serious issues like this i come to the conclusion that you have learned nothing so far CCP. The only way to fix this a little bit is insta removing tech from tech moons and NPC seed it at current prices untill ringmining is introduced. The excess isk gained should be removed to a level thats acceptable, something thats upto you to decide. The biggest reson for this to do it now is due ISK stocking. When the amount of isk that an allaice gains is soo high that they can save up 500 billion isk a month, something must be serious wrong. When an alliance has over 10 Trillion in savings and gaining another 500 billion a month something is not right.... Expecialy when it is publicly known that CCP employees have high ranks in that allaince. A serious Public Image Threat for you marketing department and your customer base.
Would you like a little cheese with that whine?
|

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
122
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:16:00 -
[30] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Cant if the current holders buys corps, strenght and has untimited reimbursement powers. Read my post properly pls
i'm sorry but the people in null sec who didn't bother to try and take the tech moons have nobody to blame but themselves. this situation is a direct result of their own actions or lack of. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
994
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:16:00 -
[31] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xython wrote:Spurty wrote: Not sure why everyone wants to fight over null sec ... People camping Jita undock / gates are ahead of the curve with regards to effort / risk / reward
Holding tech doesn't affect them. Only concern they have is that Jita doesn't get it's trillions of ISK brought in / out every few hours
Also, I think you're vastly mistaken re: Tech profits. If you got 7000 players together and had them doing something in highsec, like say, mission running, or Ice botting, or crafting ships or something, you'd see similar profits. Tech is just what Goons "do" right now, because of a lucky happenstance with Goon space and moon goo. T The difference is there are not 7000 people mining moon goo. I don't how many people exactly you have tending to POS but I am sure it's just a small handful. A handful of people making the same amount of isk (almost completely passively may I add) as 7000 people actively running missions or mining ice.
Sure, a small handful of people tending to POS... and an army of people offering required logistics support to ensure that handful of people can actually DO the moon mining in the first place. Don't try the false comparison bullshit there, it won't work. It's not 5 guys and a single spreadsheet leading to a trillion ISK a month in tech profits; it's the work of thousands of people in the Swarm working together.
Nullsec isn't Highsec, we have no CONCORD to hold our hands and wipe our... noses for us. If you want to start making real money in EVE, it's time to take off the training wheels and move out of Highsec. And CCP needs to get off their asses and move MORE money out of Highsec, because the Risk/Reward is so screwed up it's not even funny. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
994
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:18:00 -
[32] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Why cause this is a serious issue that is serious broken and that is affecting your income?
No, because you're an alt-corp troll ("foonfleet? Skill yourself.) who has a rather obvious agenda and a poor grasp of the English language. "serious broken" indeed. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
15
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:19:00 -
[33] - Quote
Xython wrote:forestwho wrote:Why cause this is a serious issue that is serious broken and that is affecting your income? No, because you're an alt-corp troll ("foonfleet? Skill yourself.) who has a rather obvious agenda and a poor grasp of the English language. "serious broken" indeed.
you mad? |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
994
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:19:00 -
[34] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Cant if the current holders buys corps, strenght and has untimited reimbursement powers. Read my post properly pls i'm sorry but the people in null sec who didn't bother to try and take the tech moons have nobody to blame but themselves. this situation is a direct result of their own actions or lack of.
Ah, but it's a lot more fun to wine to CCP and pray that they intervene in the sandbox to "fix" the fact that Goonfleet and the CFC actually like the game enough to do things like take and hold tech moons.
Hey, before you roll your eyes -- it worked for the lazy bastards AFK Bot Mining in highsec! Maybe it'll work for the poor idiots in SoCo. After all, since they never undock they have plenty of time to whine on the forums under alt accounts. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
994
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:21:00 -
[35] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Xython wrote:forestwho wrote:Why cause this is a serious issue that is serious broken and that is affecting your income? No, because you're an alt-corp troll ("foonfleet? Skill yourself.) who has a rather obvious agenda and a poor grasp of the English language. "serious broken" indeed. you mad?
Nope. And it's "You mad, bro?" Get it right. |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
141
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:25:00 -
[36] - Quote
Xython wrote:Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Cant if the current holders buys corps, strenght and has untimited reimbursement powers. Read my post properly pls i'm sorry but the people in null sec who didn't bother to try and take the tech moons have nobody to blame but themselves. this situation is a direct result of their own actions or lack of. Ah, but it's a lot more fun to wine to CCP and pray that they intervene in the sandbox to "fix" the fact that Goonfleet and the CFC actually like the game enough to do things like take and hold tech moons. Hey, before you roll your eyes -- it worked for the lazy bastards AFK Bot Mining in highsec! Maybe it'll work for the poor idiots in SoCo. After all, since they never undock they have plenty of time to whine on the forums under alt accounts.
You guys are both dumb, but thanks for bringing your flawed argument to the table. How is anyone supposed to do anything about it. First the biggest alliance (Goons) allies with the second biggest alliance (TEST). Then you have all your pets, which are some of the biggest nul alliances. Your little circle jerk is nearly bigger than every non CFC nul alliance combined.
Your flawed argument is like calling the owner of a small grocery store stupid for not being more competitive and letting Walmart put him out of business. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:28:00 -
[37] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. Don't say we. You are no Goon, you are a lowly pet. There was no we, Goons fought for it and took it. Your masters just threw you a bone as condolences for all the rug burns on your knees. .
http://crackerjax.org/gwiki/GoonWIki/wiki.goonfleet.com/Deklein.html
Quote: In Summer 2010, following the Delve fiasco and the Cloud Ring fiasco, goons were invited to move to Deklein and stay on TCF's couch. Couple of months later, TCF decided they didn't want that region anyway and have moved to Venal, handing sovereignty of Deklein over to the Goonswarm Federation.
More bullsh1t please. LOL Fought for it. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8423
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:32:00 -
[38] - Quote
Pesky LaRue wrote:Just curious, but why do you think that? I have long believed that having the moon-goo fade in and out in waves would absolutely create a more dynamic null-sec landscape as the movement of scarce and limited veins would likely create a moving front-line as alliances are constantly on the go, ravaging an area for it's natural resources and then moving on.
no? Most likely no.
Precious moon goo is worth taking and holding space over. But will it be worth doing that every n months? Constant war costs and that's what will be required to create the dynamic, on top of constantly having to pull down and erect towers to get the most of your territory. It also introduces a lead time in doing all that work (and finding the new rich veins) that cuts into the profit period. So it's just as likely that it will just cause more static behaviour: better to just sit tight and take what you can GÇö build up a reserve while the riches come your way and wait out the downtime before the die rolls in your favour again.
At the same time, it's also as likely that it will not actually work against the GÇ£big guysGÇ¥ GÇö that lead-up time will once again come to bite you if and when the smaller entity suddenly finds itself sitting on a gold mine. It has to harvest all of it, get it to market, use those riches to build defencesGǪ and get all of it done before the big brutes come and stomp all over you. With this outcome, the only dynamic is that the big coalitions stomp all over the map GÇö not that there will be any dynamism in who's GÇ£on topGÇ¥ at any given time.
While it sounds good in theory, dynamic resource shifts might in practice cause even more static space holding and/or even more favour the larger alliances GÇö the (unstated) goal is often one or both of the opposites of those two outcomes. Sure, those new problems could conceivably be fixed, but that would require yet another massive revamp of both the space holding (or, more accurately, space-taking) and resource extraction mechanismsGǪ and ship buildingGǪ and force projectionGǪ and (etc).
That is not to say that it wouldn't have other beneficial effects, but things like plain old laziness, economics, and lag-time in building a power base will definitely dampen the whole GÇ£dynamicGÇ¥ aspect of that kind of change. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Aineko Macx
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
197
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:37:00 -
[39] - Quote
By OPs logic the old NC shouldn't have collapsed under external pressure. |

Xinivrae
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:43:00 -
[40] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote: You guys are both dumb, but thanks for bringing your flawed argument to the table. How is anyone supposed to do anything about it. First the biggest alliance (Goons) allies with the second biggest alliance (TEST). Then you have all your pets, which are some of the biggest nul alliances. Your little circle jerk is nearly bigger than every non CFC nul alliance combined.
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:45:00 -
[41] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Cant if the current holders buys corps, strenght and has untimited reimbursement powers. Read my post properly pls i'm sorry but the people in null sec who didn't bother to try and take the tech moons have nobody to blame but themselves. this situation is a direct result of their own actions or lack of.
So tell me about Bropact?
Seems like you shave a tech moon and you get 1200 sceamers in local that live from Fountain, all the way around to Gem. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:48:00 -
[42] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:
Your flawed argument is like calling the owner of a small grocery store stupid for not being more competitive and letting Walmart put him out of business.
What you're saying here is that the US government (CCP) should shut down Walmart (GSF/CFC/OTEC) for being too big. Yeah thats not going to happen either. It will never change because there's no rule stopping anyone from becoming Walmart.
GSF used to be the small grocery store and BOB was Walmart and what did the GSF do? We took over the galaxy and crushed BOB and its 3(so far) reiterations. If you can't do that then yes, it's no ones fault but your own.
|

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
125
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:48:00 -
[43] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Cant if the current holders buys corps, strenght and has untimited reimbursement powers. Read my post properly pls i'm sorry but the people in null sec who didn't bother to try and take the tech moons have nobody to blame but themselves. this situation is a direct result of their own actions or lack of. So tell me about Bropact? Seems like you shave a tech moon and you get 1200 sceamers in local that live from Fountain, all the way around to Gem.
i'll tell you about bropact when you tell me, in detail, about your in-game efforts to change who owns the tech moons. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:49:00 -
[44] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Cant if the current holders buys corps, strenght and has untimited reimbursement powers. Read my post properly pls i'm sorry but the people in null sec who didn't bother to try and take the tech moons have nobody to blame but themselves. this situation is a direct result of their own actions or lack of. So tell me about Bropact? Seems like you shave a tech moon and you get 1200 sceamers in local that live from Fountain, all the way around to Gem.
So get a bigger bropact. They can get 1200 dudes why cant you? |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:
So tell me about Bropact?
Seems like you shave a tech moon and you get 1200 sceamers in local that live from Fountain, all the way around to Gem.
So get a bigger bropact. They can get 1200 dudes why cant you?[/quote]
SoCo has NEVER fielded a fleet that big, as in there isn't enough of the rest of the map.
|

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:53:00 -
[46] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
i'll tell you about bropact when you tell me, in detail, about your in-game efforts to change who owns the tech moons.
Be fair they deployed, they tried, they died in a fire. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:56:00 -
[47] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Onictus wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:
So tell me about Bropact?
Seems like you shave a tech moon and you get 1200 sceamers in local that live from Fountain, all the way around to Gem.
So get a bigger bropact. They can get 1200 dudes why cant you? SoCo has NEVER fielded a fleet that big, as in there isn't enough of the rest of the map.
Not our problem even though there is, you have a large(ish) coalition, if you cant scrape 1200 from 25k then whose fault is that? That and you have 15k renters between you and solar why don't you stop shitting on them and start utilizing them? |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
125
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:56:00 -
[48] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:
i'll tell you about bropact when you tell me, in detail, about your in-game efforts to change who owns the tech moons.
Be fair they deployed, they tried, they died in a fire.
which station did they stage a sit-in for that? |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:58:00 -
[49] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:
i'll tell you about bropact when you tell me, in detail, about your in-game efforts to change who owns the tech moons.
Be fair they deployed, they tried, they died in a fire. which station did they stage a sit-in for that?
Somewhere in placid apparently. They shot a pl moon 1 jump from where they were staging and couldn't take it. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 16:59:00 -
[50] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:
i'll tell you about bropact when you tell me, in detail, about your in-game efforts to change who owns the tech moons.
Be fair they deployed, they tried, they died in a fire. which station did they stage a sit-in for that? Somewhere in placid apparently. They shot a pl moon 1 jump from where they were staging and couldn't take it.
We took it, DNS actually shaved it, so we let them have it. They held it for 17 hours or some such.
That is the terrible -A- diplomacy you always scream about.
All of the POS mods are on my KB if you have any doubts. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
125
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:00:00 -
[51] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:
i'll tell you about bropact when you tell me, in detail, about your in-game efforts to change who owns the tech moons.
Be fair they deployed, they tried, they died in a fire. which station did they stage a sit-in for that? Somewhere in placid apparently. They shot a pl moon 1 jump from where they were staging and couldn't take it.
looks like that detailed account of their efforts to change ownership of tech moons will be a worse read than 50 shades of grey. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:02:00 -
[52] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:
i'll tell you about bropact when you tell me, in detail, about your in-game efforts to change who owns the tech moons.
Be fair they deployed, they tried, they died in a fire. which station did they stage a sit-in for that? Somewhere in placid apparently. They shot a pl moon 1 jump from where they were staging and couldn't take it. looks like that detailed account of their efforts to change ownership of tech moons will be a worse read than 50 shades of grey.
I wouldn't go quite that far. I mean maka raging would provide at least some humour. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:03:00 -
[53] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Dave stark wrote:
i'll tell you about bropact when you tell me, in detail, about your in-game efforts to change who owns the tech moons.
Be fair they deployed, they tried, they died in a fire. which station did they stage a sit-in for that? Somewhere in placid apparently. They shot a pl moon 1 jump from where they were staging and couldn't take it. We took it, DNS actually shaved it, so we let them have it. They held it for 17 hours or some such. That is the terrible -A- diplomacy you always scream about. All of the POS mods are on my KB if you have any doubts.
17 hours is hardly op success... I mean did they even get any tech out of it? Like enough to pay for the dead tower? |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:04:00 -
[54] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:
I wouldn't go quite that far. I mean maka raging would provide at least some humour.
Maka rage is great, I look forward to Maka foaming when I jump in coms, that means there is some **** and its going to be fun. When he's calm, its usually a structure shoot.
Cameron Cahill wrote:
17 hours is hardly op success... I mean did they even get any tech out of it? Like enough to pay for the dead tower?
You missed the DNS part. They shaved it, they got the moon, we just gave the numbers to kill the POS. They are in no other way affiliated -A- or the SoC0, they are WAY north for us. |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
141
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:06:00 -
[55] - Quote
Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
794
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:08:00 -
[56] - Quote
dexington wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. Judging from the public opinion on the forum, you are better off staying in empire. The 0.0 population use to much time complaining about how bad everything is in 0.0, empire seem like a nice place why would anyone leave? Living in empire means more time to shoot at red dots and less time complaining on the forums, and you don't have to take part in the space politics, which seems to be mostly posting on the forums about how great you corp/alliance is, and how terrible everyone else is. There is probably only two ways to get 10% to leave empire space, the carrot or the whip. Seeing how there is nothing that comes close to being a carrot, nothing is happening unless ccp nerf empire space to hell.
My point is that if Empire Dwellers do not like the way things are right now, the same tools that Goonswarm et al have used to build their empire are also available for high sec dwellers. If they choose not avail themselves of said tools, then complaining about the way things are at present is as pointless as two bald men fighting over a comb.
It should not require CCP stepping in to solve the problems of either group (barring the possible redistribution of Tech moons). EVE has always been about player choices over and above any mechanic, nerf or buff. If players cannot make the effort to get off their comfortably padded couches and do something for themselves, then they should expect nothing to change. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:10:00 -
[57] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote: It should not require CCP stepping in to solve the problems of either group (barring the possible redistribution of Tech moons). EVE has always been about player choices over and above any mechanic, nerf or buff. If players cannot make the effort to get off their comfortably padded couches and do something for themselves, then they should expect nothing to change.
Not empty quoting. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
125
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:11:00 -
[58] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi.
while i agree with your reasoning for the analogy. the issue is, us gov't is there to protect the small business as it can't just go and set fire to the walmart.
this is eve. go burn walmart down. |

Dramaticus
Goonswarm Federation
175
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:11:00 -
[59] - Quote
Omnipotence Itself. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:15:00 -
[60] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:dexington wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. Judging from the public opinion on the forum, you are better off staying in empire. The 0.0 population use to much time complaining about how bad everything is in 0.0, empire seem like a nice place why would anyone leave? Living in empire means more time to shoot at red dots and less time complaining on the forums, and you don't have to take part in the space politics, which seems to be mostly posting on the forums about how great you corp/alliance is, and how terrible everyone else is. There is probably only two ways to get 10% to leave empire space, the carrot or the whip. Seeing how there is nothing that comes close to being a carrot, nothing is happening unless ccp nerf empire space to hell. My point is that if Empire Dwellers do not like the way things are right now, the same tools that Goonswarm et al have used to build their empire are also available for high sec dwellers. If they choose not avail themselves of said tools, then complaining about the way things are at present is as pointless as two bald men fighting over a comb. It should not require CCP stepping in to solve the problems of either group (barring the possible redistribution of Tech moons). EVE has always been about player choices over and above any mechanic, nerf or buff. If players cannot make the effort to get off their comfortably padded couches and do something for themselves, then they should expect nothing to change.
I don't completley agree here.
Your choices currently are rent, or NPC space if you want to go on your own.
Some corps have pulled it, Black Aces went from renter, to trial, to member and onward in -A-. I wish them luck, they were chill as **** to fly with.
NPC space has issues with ability of denial, and renting has basically SOV bills. Eitherway there are bigger fish.
Fact is that supers drive null, and you can't build supers without sov, you "may" be able to buy them, but they don't appear from air, and there isn't a huge market, generally the people with the ability and the security to build them don't farm them out.
All good also.
The catch 22 is you need sov to build supers and you need supers to hold sov. |

Jonah Gravenstein
577
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:16:00 -
[61] - Quote
If all the people who whine about the CFC and their tech holdings banded together they could probably field equal or greater numbers than the CFC in the battle for tech control, but they won't, why? because they're all too busy squabbling with each other to actually pull their fingers out of their posteriors and do something about it.
/me dons flame retardant suit War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:19:00 -
[62] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:If all the people who whine about the CFC and their tech holdings banded together they could probably field equal or greater numbers than the CFC in the battle for tech control, but they won't, why? because they're all too busy squabbling with each other to actually pull their fingers out of their posteriors and do something about it.
/me dons flame retardant suit
They tried and CCP changed the wardec system.
Which actually worked for us, PL had about 35 hi-sec corps arrayed against -A- at the time. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:25:00 -
[63] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:If all the people who whine about the CFC and their tech holdings banded together they could probably field equal or greater numbers than the CFC in the battle for tech control, but they won't, why? because they're all too busy squabbling with each other to actually pull their fingers out of their posteriors and do something about it.
/me dons flame retardant suit They tried and CCP changed the wardec system. Which actually worked for us, PL had about 35 hi-sec corps arrayed against -A- at the time.
Cause tech moons are in Hi-sec........ |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:Onictus wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:If all the people who whine about the CFC and their tech holdings banded together they could probably field equal or greater numbers than the CFC in the battle for tech control, but they won't, why? because they're all too busy squabbling with each other to actually pull their fingers out of their posteriors and do something about it.
/me dons flame retardant suit They tried and CCP changed the wardec system. Which actually worked for us, PL had about 35 hi-sec corps arrayed against -A- at the time. Cause tech moons are in Hi-sec........
Oh who were the first to scream when there were 4000 "pubies" arrayed against them? We changed our logistics routes, you guys cried all over the place. |

Forum Clone 77777
State War Academy Caldari State
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:29:00 -
[65] - Quote
CCP should just implement a feature where you can sabotage enemies moons, so that they need to be actively defended if they are gonna keep on producing the materials.
Obviously Im not talking about some lonely bomber doing a small quick raid, but youd need to put effort and RISK into sabotaging your enemies moon aswell.
Say a dread could bombard a moon and it would be down until next downtime.
And tech moons should be spread out evenly'ish otherwise.. Well look at our current situation. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
17
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:31:00 -
[66] - Quote
Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
794
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:31:00 -
[67] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:dexington wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. Judging from the public opinion on the forum, you are better off staying in empire. The 0.0 population use to much time complaining about how bad everything is in 0.0, empire seem like a nice place why would anyone leave? Living in empire means more time to shoot at red dots and less time complaining on the forums, and you don't have to take part in the space politics, which seems to be mostly posting on the forums about how great you corp/alliance is, and how terrible everyone else is. There is probably only two ways to get 10% to leave empire space, the carrot or the whip. Seeing how there is nothing that comes close to being a carrot, nothing is happening unless ccp nerf empire space to hell. My point is that if Empire Dwellers do not like the way things are right now, the same tools that Goonswarm et al have used to build their empire are also available for high sec dwellers. If they choose not avail themselves of said tools, then complaining about the way things are at present is as pointless as two bald men fighting over a comb. It should not require CCP stepping in to solve the problems of either group (barring the possible redistribution of Tech moons). EVE has always been about player choices over and above any mechanic, nerf or buff. If players cannot make the effort to get off their comfortably padded couches and do something for themselves, then they should expect nothing to change. I don't completley agree here. Your choices currently are rent, or NPC space if you want to go on your own. Some corps have pulled it, Black Aces went from renter, to trial, to member and onward in -A-. I wish them luck, they were chill as **** to fly with. NPC space has issues with ability of denial, and renting has basically SOV bills. Eitherway there are bigger fish. Fact is that supers drive null, and you can't build supers without sov, you "may" be able to buy them, but they don't appear from air, and there isn't a huge market, generally the people with the ability and the security to build them don't farm them out. All good also. The catch 22 is you need sov to build supers and you need supers to hold sov.
Your choices are the same now as they have always been, fight or go home. It is the defeatist and weak willed attitude of other players that allows such large null sec alliances the room to spread. Yes, getting a foothold in null is not as easy as it once was, but that does not mean it is impossible, it just requires a little more effort.
If the enemy has big ships that you don't have, then bring excessive numbers of smaller ships. As I said earlier, if only a fraction of the high sec population formed an alliance, or at the very least a band of corporations, they would out number even the largest of the null sec alliances by at least 7 to 1. I dare anyone to see off those kinds of numbers. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:34:00 -
[68] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Onictus wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:If all the people who whine about the CFC and their tech holdings banded together they could probably field equal or greater numbers than the CFC in the battle for tech control, but they won't, why? because they're all too busy squabbling with each other to actually pull their fingers out of their posteriors and do something about it.
/me dons flame retardant suit They tried and CCP changed the wardec system. Which actually worked for us, PL had about 35 hi-sec corps arrayed against -A- at the time. Cause tech moons are in Hi-sec........ Oh who were the first to scream when there were 4000 "pubies" arrayed against them? We changed our logistics routes, you guys cried all over the place.
Where did we cry? |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
17
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:34:00 -
[69] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote: Your choices are the same now as they have always been, fight or go home. It is the defeatist and weak willed attitude of other players that allows such large null sec alliances the room to spread. Yes, getting a foothold in null is not as easy as it once was, but that does not mean it is impossible, it just requires a little more effort.
If the enemy has big ships that you don't have, then bring excessive numbers of smaller ships. As I said earlier, if only a fraction of the high sec population formed an alliance, or at the very least a band of corporations, they would out number even the largest of the null sec alliances by at least 7 to 1. I dare anyone to see off those kinds of numbers.
Most high sec ppl are isk making alts of whoever or whatever. The ones that are not are ppl that just joined EVE or not intested at all in pvp (the wowish ppl). I fight a empire ppl fleet outnumbers 7-1 anyday of the time. Skill does matter you know... exept in 90% tidi ofc.... |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
868
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:35:00 -
[70] - Quote
Oh look, this thread again.
"I cant organise a big enough coalition of people to beat their coalition of people so CCP please can you fix it for me so they are less strong please." Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:35:00 -
[71] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come....
The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves. |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:38:00 -
[72] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:If all the people who whine about the CFC and their tech holdings banded together they could probably field equal or greater numbers than the CFC in the battle for tech control, but they won't, why? because they're all too busy squabbling with each other to actually pull their fingers out of their posteriors and do something about it.
/me dons flame retardant suit They tried and CCP changed the wardec system. Which actually worked for us, PL had about 35 hi-sec corps arrayed against -A- at the time.
Hey -A- I know you are bad, but parroting Jade Constantine is a new low |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
17
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:40:00 -
[73] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves.
I dont realy care who has the isk now, fact is... next couple of years were all effected by this disbalancement and it doesnt exacly makes the 0.0 wars/ politics/ pew pew/ explosion quality any better.....
There is alot more involved that creates the EVE experiance than just pew pew.... if ppl are leaving the game because its so disbalanced and sooo obvius retared, the internal fun of being in a 0.0 is affected.... thereby less valued and the game dies a little bit
This happends on small scale but has a butterfly affect that will cause hugh inpact on long term... this is what im trying to explain in my first post... but as obvius my english isnt as good as my brains & eve experiance |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
125
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:42:00 -
[74] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves. I dont realy care who has the isk now, fact is... next couple of years were all effected by this disbalancement and it doesnt exacly makes the 0.0 wars/ politics/ pew pew/ explosion quality any better..... you clearly do care or you wouldn't have made a forum thread about it. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
17
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:44:00 -
[75] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves. I dont realy care who has the isk now, fact is... next couple of years were all effected by this disbalancement and it doesnt exacly makes the 0.0 wars/ politics/ pew pew/ explosion quality any better..... you clearly do care or you wouldn't have made a forum thread about it.
srry wasnt finished editing above post |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
662
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:44:00 -
[76] - Quote
Sorry that we're better at internet spaceships than you are. Your bitter tears fuel our war machine. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
125
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:44:00 -
[77] - Quote
forestwho wrote:srry wasnt finished editing above post oh, ok. carry on. |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
868
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:44:00 -
[78] - Quote
Also Im going to post again because you guys whining are really annoying me.
Technetium and isk DOES NOT WIN WARS. Morale and activity along with players who are actually enjoying themselves win wars.
And if isk is the real issue, MAKE MORE, it doesnt have to be technetium you know, if you put some effort in you can make plenty of isk. For instance:
A Fullerides reaction set which can be made in lowsec, you need a two moons preferably in one system or close by, one needs to be Platinum, that is th eonly isk moon you need for this. Yes you need to buy technetium, but you produce Fullerides and that will net you between 1 and 2.5 billion isk PROFIT EVERY 8 DAYS depending on the market.
My corp runs one of those and a few carbides and sylramics, pretty easy stuff and easy to manage and we make alot of isk, that is just at corp level. If you cant be bothered to do it and just want an easy isk tap then perhaps you dont deserve the right to become powerful enough to challenge teh CFC. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
794
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:46:00 -
[79] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote: Your choices are the same now as they have always been, fight or go home. It is the defeatist and weak willed attitude of other players that allows such large null sec alliances the room to spread. Yes, getting a foothold in null is not as easy as it once was, but that does not mean it is impossible, it just requires a little more effort.
If the enemy has big ships that you don't have, then bring excessive numbers of smaller ships. As I said earlier, if only a fraction of the high sec population formed an alliance, or at the very least a band of corporations, they would out number even the largest of the null sec alliances by at least 7 to 1. I dare anyone to see off those kinds of numbers.
Most high sec ppl are isk making alts of whoever or whatever. The ones that are not are ppl that just joined EVE or not intested at all in pvp (the wowish ppl). I fight a empire ppl fleet outnumbers 7-1 anyday of the time. Skill does matter you know... exept in 90% tidi ofc....
Could you please refrain from using made up statistics, it rather muddies the waters somewhat. How you come to the conclusion that everyone in high sec is either an alt of a low sec pilot, or a newbie is quite beyond me. You might also want to learn to distinguish between those pilots who are risk averse, and those who simply do not bother. One will run, the other will very likely turn and bite you back. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
17
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:48:00 -
[80] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:Also Im going to post again because you guys whining are really annoying me.
Technetium and isk DOES NOT WIN WARS. Morale and activity along with players who are actually enjoying themselves win wars.
And if isk is the real issue, MAKE MORE, it doesnt have to be technetium you know, if you put some effort in you can make plenty of isk. For instance:
A Fullerides reaction set which can be made in lowsec, you need a two moons preferably in one system or close by, one needs to be Platinum, that is th eonly isk moon you need for this. Yes you need to buy technetium, but you produce Fullerides and that will net you between 1 and 2.5 billion isk PROFIT EVERY 8 DAYS depending on the market.
My corp runs one of those and a few carbides and sylramics, pretty easy stuff and easy to manage and we make alot of isk, that is just at corp level. If you cant be bothered to do it and just want an easy isk tap then perhaps you dont deserve the right to become powerful enough to challenge teh CFC.
This is corp level income making, whitch is nice... but an alliance needs a lille bit more isk. And fact is if you fullscale to alliance needed income the market saturates and profits decline. Im sure non tech holding allies has plenty of other income. But so the the tech holding alliances if they are smart.... The moon income is extra on top of all that... |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
136
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:51:00 -
[81] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi. You know what you can do? You can talk to a bigger alliance, and help them out, either defending or taking space with them. If your 250 man alliance isn't totally incompetent, or you have some potential, maybe they will help you get some space to grow in, in return. It's called diplomacy, you should try it.
It amazes me that people still think 0.0 is still some neo-feudalistic playground, rather than a group of nation-states each with their own political and ideological rivalries, friendships, and politically expediant bedfellows. "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:52:00 -
[82] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves.
You were handed that ****, do I have to go link it off you wiki AGAIN? Don't make me go back though my post history. |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:53:00 -
[83] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves. You were handed that ****, do I have to go link it off you wiki AGAIN? Don't make me go back though my post history.
But what about the other half of the galaxy we conquered |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
125
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:54:00 -
[84] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves. I dont realy care who has the isk now, fact is... next couple of years were all effected by this disbalancement and it doesnt exacly makes the 0.0 wars/ politics/ pew pew/ explosion quality any better..... There is alot more involved that creates the EVE experiance than just pew pew.... if ppl are leaving the game because its so disbalanced and sooo obvius retared, the internal fun of being in a 0.0 is affected.... thereby less valued and the game dies a little bit This happends on small scale but has a butterfly affect that will cause hugh inpact on long term... this is what im trying to explain in my first post... but as obvius my english isnt as good as my brains & eve experiance
i've been in both the south and the north of nullsec, and it honestly has nothing to do with tech, or isk.
it's the players.
when i was in the south and a CTA was called, either people didn't bother and carried on ratting instead of defending their sov, or just sitting docked in a station until the bad men went away... however in the north it's so, so different. yes, granted i may have just been with ****** people in the south. still, the difference between where i was and where i am is like day and night, that's all down to the people.
yes sure having boat loads of isk will give some one an advantage, but that means nothing if you're sitting on piles of isk and refuse to undock to defend your piles of isk. no matter what CCP does they can not force people to play a certain way. the whole issue here is the people and nothing more.
let's assume for a second that one group of people ends up in control of null sec (doesn't matter who it is, soco, cfc, goons, your granny's favourite tea pot, or gene wilder) they are going to get bored, eventually they'll either collapse internally, or reset each other for some shooting, and new coalitions will form and the cycle will go on. this perceived lack of balance will not cause the demise of the game, really. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 17:58:00 -
[85] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:Onictus wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves. You were handed that ****, do I have to go link it off you wiki AGAIN? Don't make me go back though my post history. But what about the other half of the galaxy we conquered
Rather be lucky then good.
I'm not hating, that's how it works. |

Xpaulusx
V I R I I Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:01:00 -
[86] - Quote
This was a problem before CFC, even before old NC, in fact it was Mitti himself who complian about TEC so you cant point the finger at CFC, its CCP fault with the endless footdragging on this issue. Scream at CCP not fellow Gamers. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
17
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:04:00 -
[87] - Quote
Dave stark wrote: i've been in both the south and the north of nullsec, and it honestly has nothing to do with tech, or isk.
it's the players.
when i was in the south and a CTA was called, either people didn't bother and carried on ratting instead of defending their sov, or just sitting docked in a station until the bad men went away... however in the north it's so, so different. yes, granted i may have just been with ****** people in the south. still, the difference between where i was and where i am is like day and night, that's all down to the people.
yes sure having boat loads of isk will give some one an advantage, but that means nothing if you're sitting on piles of isk and refuse to undock to defend your piles of isk. no matter what CCP does they can not force people to play a certain way. the whole issue here is the people and nothing more.
I agree with you on some part with this. Peaples playing mentality is also very important. I do not want to go into this one too much as we end up in a conversation about blobbing again. Fact is though that a pile of "free" isk can mean a whole lot as in terms of free 100% full reimbursements. I know for example that the AAA T3 doctrine is not fully 100% reimbursed which does affect the will to fight vs larger numbers.
Dave stark wrote: let's assume for a second that one group of people ends up in control of null sec (doesn't matter who it is, soco, cfc, goons, your granny's favourite tea pot, or gene wilder) they are going to get bored, eventually they'll either collapse internally, or reset each other for some shooting, and new coalitions will form and the cycle will go on. this perceived lack of balance will not cause the demise of the game, really.
I totaly agree with you on this but eve would become terrible boring for a long time before this internal collapse. Than i come back at this butterfly affect i posted earlier. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
17
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:05:00 -
[88] - Quote
Xpaulusx wrote:This was a problem before CFC, even before old NC, in fact it was Mitti himself who complian about TEC so you cant point the finger at CFC, its CCP fault with the endless footdragging on this issue. Scream at CCP not fellow Gamers.
Im not, read thread title....... im not blaming anyone, im saying that injecting a high amount of isk in the economie is going to affect us (everyone, eve plitics, pew pew, ship explosions and roamin) for many years,... and this is very unhealthy |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:05:00 -
[89] - Quote
Xpaulusx wrote:This was a problem before CFC, even before old NC, in fact it was Mitti himself who complian about TEC so you cant point the finger at CFC, its CCP fault with the endless footdragging on this issue. Scream at CCP not fellow Gamers.
Tinfoil says CCP is Goons 
...not really but squeaky wheel gets the grease, and they squeak like mad. |

Internet Lawyer Steve
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
42
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:07:00 -
[90] - Quote
Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it.
CFC hasnt fought for anything.
Goons were given Dek The rest of you either were already NC pets, that switched sides, or took vacated space. Any member of the CFC cannot do anything by themselves. Thats why there are 40k of them in the north. Also include PL in this. Since PL cant even hold their own Tech moons without callilng the CFC to save them.
The only thing that will break up the big circle jerk is a tech nerf, making it so expensive to hold more space that is needed or adding the War Dec mechanic that makes them pay for blue standings. Since they are "Allies" they should have the same cost.
Internet Lawyer Steve and Associates,
Bringing Justice to New Eden, One post at a time... |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:13:00 -
[91] - Quote
Internet Lawyer Steve wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. CFC hasnt fought for anything. Goons were given Dek The rest of you either were already NC pets, that switched sides, or took vacated space. Any member of the CFC cannot do anything by themselves. Thats why there are 40k of them in the north. Also include PL in this. Since PL cant even hold their own Tech moons without callilng the CFC to save them. The only thing that will break up the big circle jerk is a tech nerf, making it so expensive to hold more space that is needed or adding the War Dec mechanic that makes them pay for blue standings. Since they are "Allies" they should have the same cost.
branch? tenal? CR? Fountain?
And we should pay to -not- shoot each other... good luck with that.... |

Apostate Lucius
Hedion University Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:15:00 -
[92] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. Don't say we. You are no Goon, you are a lowly pet. There was no we, Goons fought for it and took it. Your masters just threw you a bone as condolences for all the rug burns on your knees. Also Goons give themselves more credit than they deserve. They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. Goons would of never been able to beat BOB in a normal war, and they know that too. If they thought for even a second they could win they wouldn't have destroyed BOB in one fell swoop with no shots fired. Why take away your biggest target if you think you can beat them? Because they knew they had zero chance.
You speak the Goon mentality truly, in that they use their allies to further themselves. Allies like FA and TEST, nothing more than tools to be employed in the commision of a task, and then petted on the head and tossed a few scraps to keep you placated. A TEST member once said that the Goons and TEST were BFFs, but the reality is that Goons don't have friends. Goons watch out for Goons, no one else. When you have served your purpose, you will be tossed aside if you are lucky.
The Goons are BoB now, in every way short of name. History repeats itself again, and how much of that history being repeated is unknown to everyone but to CCP and Mittani. Why it has taken this long for anyone to come to the conclusion is beyond me. I'm sure that during their transitional period would have been a good time to strike out, but unfortunately I believe everyone involved with them had nothing but stars in their eyes. Now given the pure money situation along with their combat doctrine, it's likely that no one will ever be capable of dislodging them from their position.
Why though, does all of null sec expect the high sec players to come and save them? Are the null sec players not up to the task themselves? What does that say when such players disparage a group that they fully expect to come and do what they are either afraid to do, or are just unwilling? Let Caesar never forget, though he may rule by the authority of the gods, he is allowed to rule by the whim of the people. |

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
792
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:17:00 -
[93] - Quote
Internet Lawyer Steve wrote:CFC hasnt fought for anything. So bitter.  Why did you take my wings away? |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1275
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:18:00 -
[94] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves. You were handed that ****, do I have to go link it off you wiki AGAIN? Don't make me go back though my post history.
we inherited like 20 tech moons from TCF after the merger
we took the other 50-60 tech moons we have a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1275
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:21:00 -
[95] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. Don't say we. You are no Goon, you are a lowly pet. There was no we, Goons fought for it and took it. Your masters just threw you a bone as condolences for all the rug burns on your knees. Also Goons give themselves more credit than they deserve. They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. Goons would of never been able to beat BOB in a normal war, and they know that too. If they thought for even a second they could win they wouldn't have destroyed BOB in one fell swoop with no shots fired. Why take away your biggest target if you think you can beat them? Because they knew they had zero chance.
disbanding BoB only took away their sov 4 advantage and prevented them from jamming systems for a few weeks
I mean surely Omnipotence Itself didn't need that advantage right????? a rogue goon |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
17
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:27:00 -
[96] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. Don't say we. You are no Goon, you are a lowly pet. There was no we, Goons fought for it and took it. Your masters just threw you a bone as condolences for all the rug burns on your knees. Also Goons give themselves more credit than they deserve. They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. Goons would of never been able to beat BOB in a normal war, and they know that too. If they thought for even a second they could win they wouldn't have destroyed BOB in one fell swoop with no shots fired. Why take away your biggest target if you think you can beat them? Because they knew they had zero chance. disbanding BoB only took away their sov 4 advantage and prevented them from jamming systems for a few weeks I mean surely Omnipotence Itself didn't need that advantage right?????
with razor, mm, goon, test and pl supers bob only could win fights if they fought under cyno jammers. Thats was taken way so he did collapse bob kinda.... Their jb advantage was also lost, hugh asset loss |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:28:00 -
[97] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Onictus wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves. You were handed that ****, do I have to go link it off you wiki AGAIN? Don't make me go back though my post history. we inherited like 20 tech moons from TCF after the merger we took the other 50-60 tech moons we have
Pretty easy when you sit on your laurels.
Only conflict you got involved in was on DRF's side, and you didn't to jack there either.
WN was Horus'd Raiden. was an inside job (or a Goon spy) neither or which could be claimed as a military victory. Oddly you never tried against NC. There were scraps, but othing real.
You zerged Raiden with what 180 dreads to kill a Titan, and lost half of that fleet. If you can't beat them join them right?
So what do you do against an allaince that doesn't really care about space? Its been proven repeatedly that -A- is dead, and couldn't possibly do anything. Yet here we are, the leader of the SoCo, by default. We don't play your game. Bring that ****.
:edit
waving the hand as a (lol) "badposter" |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:30:00 -
[98] - Quote
Apostate Lucius wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. Don't say we. You are no Goon, you are a lowly pet. There was no we, Goons fought for it and took it. Your masters just threw you a bone as condolences for all the rug burns on your knees. Also Goons give themselves more credit than they deserve. They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. Goons would of never been able to beat BOB in a normal war, and they know that too. If they thought for even a second they could win they wouldn't have destroyed BOB in one fell swoop with no shots fired. Why take away your biggest target if you think you can beat them? Because they knew they had zero chance. You speak the Goon mentality truly, in that they use their allies to further themselves. Allies like FA and TEST, nothing more than tools to be employed in the commision of a task, and then petted on the head and tossed a few scraps to keep you placated. A TEST member once said that the Goons and TEST were BFFs, but the reality is that Goons don't have friends. Goons watch out for Goons, no one else. When you have served your purpose, you will be tossed aside if you are lucky. The Goons are BoB now, in every way short of name. History repeats itself again, and how much of that history being repeated is unknown to everyone but to CCP and Mittani. Why it has taken this long for anyone to come to the conclusion is beyond me. I'm sure that during their transitional period would have been a good time to strike out, but unfortunately I believe everyone involved with them had nothing but stars in their eyes. Now given the pure money situation along with their combat doctrine, it's likely that no one will ever be capable of dislodging them from their position. Why though, does all of null sec expect the high sec players to come and save them? Are the null sec players not up to the task themselves? What does that say when such players disparage a group that they fully expect to come and do what they are either afraid to do, or are just unwilling?
Untrue friend. We treat our allies a damn sight better than anyone else does, why do you think we have so many?
And no we're using hisec players as an example that there is a recruitment base out there. ie the CFC doesn't control +50% of the numbers in eve. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:33:00 -
[99] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Onictus wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:forestwho wrote:Doesnt matter all, fact is..... 0.0 is numbers and super... both are easy to be bought with isk and isk promises to good corporations. Fact is, exessively amount of isks on one side is not healty and is severly disbalancing the game for many years to come.... The one side took the isk. if its not balanced then its the other sides fault for not seeing their chance and taking it for themselves. You were handed that ****, do I have to go link it off you wiki AGAIN? Don't make me go back though my post history. we inherited like 20 tech moons from TCF after the merger we took the other 50-60 tech moons we have Pretty easy when you sit on your laurels. Only conflict you got involved in was on DRF's side, and you didn't to jack there either. WN was Horus'd Raiden. was an inside job (or a Goon spy) neither or which could be claimed as a military victory. Oddly you never tried against NC. There were scraps, but othing real. You zerged Raiden with what 180 dreads to kill a Titan, and lost half of that fleet. If you can't beat them join them right? So what do you do against an allaince that doesn't really care about space? Its been proven repeatedly that -A- is dead, and couldn't possibly do anything. Yet here we are, the leader of the SoCo, by default. We don't play your game. Bring that ****. :edit waving the hand as a (lol) "badposter"
How was Raiden. an inside job? and if you don't care about space why do you hold it? why were you planning to take fountain and cr if you 'dont want space'? |

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
792
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:35:00 -
[100] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Bring that ****. Undock then. I'll wave hi in local for you.  Why did you take my wings away? |

Forum Foreplay
Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:36:00 -
[101] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  i think the point the op was trying to make is that they've had it that long they're too well resourced/dug in/whatever. which just makes me wonder why nobody tried to do any thing sooner?
Always keep in mind it is a game, if this were RL and it was oil, sure there would be war.
But it is a computer game and at the extreme ends people expect game mechanics to place limits on extremes.
Usually the difficulty curve increases radically at the top, but in EvE it actually levels off until difficulty and risk are actually reduced.
Even a sandbox has borders to keep the sand inside...
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:38:00 -
[102] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote: How was Raiden. an inside job? and if you don't care about space why do you hold it? why were you planning to take fountain and cr if you 'dont want space'?
Raiden lost all of their SOV short of a few stations and like 2 systems when a founding corp took the rental income, and swapped SOV from rental holding corp to Rolling Thunder and bagged ass.
There was no military conquering there either, a bit of sadistic opportunism, but that's eve. |

Gillia Winddancer
Aliastra Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:38:00 -
[103] - Quote
Pardon this comparison a bit as it may be slightly offensive to some but...
I see any good and active corp/alliance as a cancer: it keeps growing and growing if it's not challenged or kept in check. Only way to reduce it is to fight it head on. If it's grown as big and fat as Goon and allies then yeah, no one to blame but the passive onlookers.
Want to beat goons and take their space/moons/whatever? Start gritting away, isk by isk. They may brag their asses off about having unlimited funding, but that statement is not entirely true. Yeah, they may have funding beyond comprehension, but hey, that's the long road that you passive folks created yourselves. So start walking it. Sure, the current mechanics may be far from ideal, and whilst I at least won't deny the hard work that must have been put into creating such a huge alliance, I also think that some aspects are too far on the "easy" road when it comes to managing such huge groups/controlling so much space.
As for the resources, I've said it before that the way resources work and are spread in the universe really could use a revamp. Again, that's just another one ingredient out of many which makes the nice cake that is called "unwillingness to venture to null-sec".
The way I see it, if CCP is capable of making a better cake that can improve traffic to null-sec, maybe then more people would eventually begin that long walk on that Goonie road. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:40:00 -
[104] - Quote
Gillia Winddancer wrote:Pardon this comparison a bit as it may be slightly offensive to some but...
I see any good and active corp/alliance as a cancer: it keeps growing and growing if it's not challenged or kept in check. Only way to reduce it is to fight it head on. If it's grown as big and fat as Goon and allies then yeah, no one to blame but the passive onlookers.
Want to beat goons and take their space/moons/whatever? Start gritting away, isk by isk. They may brag their asses off about having unlimited funding, but that statement is not entirely true. Yeah, they may have funding beyond comprehension, but hey, that's the long road that you passive folks created yourselves. So start walking it. Sure, the current mechanics may be far from ideal, and whilst I at least won't deny the hard work that must have been put into creating such a huge alliance, I also think that some aspects are too far on the "easy" road when it comes to managing such huge groups/controlling so much space.
As for the resources, I've said it before that the way resources work and are spread in the universe really could use a revamp. Again, that's just another one ingredient out of many which makes the nice cake that is called "unwillingness to venture to null-sec".
The way I see it, if CCP is capable of making a better cake that can improve traffic to null-sec, maybe then more people would eventually begin that long walk on that Goonie road.
Very Zen, but ineffective in the long run. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub Like I Give A F--K
1430
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:42:00 -
[105] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Exellent Alliance Recruitment -Those allainces can take in more and better corps due promising them isk every month. Why shouldnt join an allaince that reimburse all your losses freely, hands out free supers and payes you 10-20b a month for just being there... Posting to confirm that goons pay their members 20b a month and throw super capitals at them.
Most goons systems just have super capitals laying around unmanned, so any of their members can jump in and belt rat if they feel like it. You can find those supers by following the trail of jet cans full of technetium.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Gillia Winddancer
Aliastra Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:44:00 -
[106] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Gillia Winddancer wrote:Pardon this comparison a bit as it may be slightly offensive to some but...
I see any good and active corp/alliance as a cancer: it keeps growing and growing if it's not challenged or kept in check. Only way to reduce it is to fight it head on. If it's grown as big and fat as Goon and allies then yeah, no one to blame but the passive onlookers.
Want to beat goons and take their space/moons/whatever? Start gritting away, isk by isk. They may brag their asses off about having unlimited funding, but that statement is not entirely true. Yeah, they may have funding beyond comprehension, but hey, that's the long road that you passive folks created yourselves. So start walking it. Sure, the current mechanics may be far from ideal, and whilst I at least won't deny the hard work that must have been put into creating such a huge alliance, I also think that some aspects are too far on the "easy" road when it comes to managing such huge groups/controlling so much space.
As for the resources, I've said it before that the way resources work and are spread in the universe really could use a revamp. Again, that's just another one ingredient out of many which makes the nice cake that is called "unwillingness to venture to null-sec".
The way I see it, if CCP is capable of making a better cake that can improve traffic to null-sec, maybe then more people would eventually begin that long walk on that Goonie road. Very Zen, but ineffective in the long run.
Ineffectiveness is just another word for lack of determination in EVE as far as I can tell. And here I thought that this game was supposed to be a sandbox where player determination can achieve anything through hard work. Like Goonies.
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
159
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:47:00 -
[107] - Quote
Gillia Winddancer wrote: Ineffectiveness is just another word for lack of determination in EVE as far as I can tell. And here I thought that this game was supposed to be a sandbox where player determination can achieve anything through hard work. Like Goonies.
Number account for a lot.
They have numbers at least. |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:50:00 -
[108] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote: How was Raiden. an inside job? and if you don't care about space why do you hold it? why were you planning to take fountain and cr if you 'dont want space'?
Raiden lost all of their SOV short of a few stations and like 2 systems when a founding corp took the rental income, and swapped SOV from rental holding corp to Rolling Thunder and bagged ass. There was no military conquering there either, a bit of sadistic opportunism, but that's eve.
Yes, AFTER they lost tenal, and you didn't answer my other question. |

William Nimitz
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:53:00 -
[109] - Quote
http://www.mmorpg.com/blogs/Teala/052012/23055_BOB-20-Did-employees-of-CCP-show-favoritism-to-a-Corporation-again
Is it any wonder that the CFC controls such a vast portion of northern nullspace?  "That is not to say that we can relax our readiness to defend ourselves. Our armament must be adequate to the needs, but our faith is not primarily in these machines of defense but in ourselves." - Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz
|

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
792
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 18:57:00 -
[110] - Quote
I hear we also got CCP to break bombs to win this war. Why did you take my wings away? |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 19:00:00 -
[111] - Quote
You really think if we owned CCP we'd get them to intervene in a wardec? No free T2 bpos? No free titans? That and it involves a 10 minute petition response it would have been a nice troll but that makes it unbelievable.
3/10 |

Martil
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 19:03:00 -
[112] - Quote
CCP gave me a free hotdog once |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8427
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 19:05:00 -
[113] - Quote
Martil wrote:CCP gave me a free hotdog once Me too. Fancy that.
GǪwell, for large values of GÇ£freeGÇ¥. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub Like I Give A F--K
1430
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 19:08:00 -
[114] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:You really think if we owned CCP we'd get them to intervene in a wardec? No free T2 bpos? No free titans? That and it involves a 10 minute petition response it would have been a nice troll but that makes it unbelievable. 3/10 It still makes me laugh when high sec players think they have any kind of detrimental effect on large null sec alliances, when those alliances all use neutral haulers for transporting goods through high sec.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Captain Fandango
The Primrose League
3
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 19:11:00 -
[115] - Quote
Time Funnel wrote:forestwho wrote: This is an armsrace that will effects eve for a long long time. Due poor game desighn and repeatable negection of serious issues like this i come to the conclusion that you have learned nothing so far CCP. The only way to fix this a little bit is insta removing tech from tech moons and NPC seed it at current prices untill ringmining is introduced. The excess isk gained should be removed to a level thats acceptable, something thats upto you to decide. The biggest reson for this to do it now is due ISK stocking. When the amount of isk that an allaice gains is soo high that they can save up 500 billion isk a month, something must be serious wrong. When an alliance has over 10 Trillion in savings and gaining another 500 billion a month something is not right.... Expecialy when it is publicly known that CCP employees have high ranks in that allaince. A serious Public Image Threat for you marketing department and your customer base.
I agreed with you up until you offered your solution. The correct solution in a sandbox game is to change the rules of the sandbox not to artificially inject things into the market for reasons of "stability" or "fairness". For the entire life of EVE there have been massive imbalances in the game mechanics. Perhaps the game mechanics can be balanced and iterated on in a way that makes things better and does not create another super imbalance like Tech did. The fact that Tech has not been balanced in 4? years simply blows my mind.
BETTER? Better in what way? why are massive imbalances a bad thing? I'm no goon fan boy, i don't think the cfc are anywhere near cool enough to run a tech empire, I'd far rather a group of suave brittish space pirates ran eve but that dosen't mean that the CFC having a monoploy is a bad thing....
Look this is eve, it's supposed to be a visceral, real world, why on earth would it be better if anyone and everyone could compete on an equal footing, build and sell whatever they like and make a profit? Why shouldn't some corps, some empires, take over certain markets, buy out the competition, control some resources? This is what we, the player base, are buying into, the kind of game where realistic market control are a possibility, the kind of game that encourages emergent gameplay.
It's a tired old catchphrase but it's something that holds true for me. I'd quit in an instant if ccp started manufacturing rules that ensured lazy lone pilots without the comitment to forge a giant solar empire could vie with huge corperations for their slice of the market. What should happen in a sandbox game, as in real life, is nothing, until a group of players more determined, and more resourceful, come along and tipploe the goons tech empire. THAT, and only that, is the only acceptable solution in a sandbox, anything else would be artificialy imposed and at the expense of our freedom as a playerbase. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
506
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 19:39:00 -
[116] - Quote
Captain Fandango wrote:Time Funnel wrote:forestwho wrote: This is an armsrace that will effects eve for a long long time. Due poor game desighn and repeatable negection of serious issues like this i come to the conclusion that you have learned nothing so far CCP. The only way to fix this a little bit is insta removing tech from tech moons and NPC seed it at current prices untill ringmining is introduced. The excess isk gained should be removed to a level thats acceptable, something thats upto you to decide. The biggest reson for this to do it now is due ISK stocking. When the amount of isk that an allaice gains is soo high that they can save up 500 billion isk a month, something must be serious wrong. When an alliance has over 10 Trillion in savings and gaining another 500 billion a month something is not right.... Expecialy when it is publicly known that CCP employees have high ranks in that allaince. A serious Public Image Threat for you marketing department and your customer base.
I agreed with you up until you offered your solution. The correct solution in a sandbox game is to change the rules of the sandbox not to artificially inject things into the market for reasons of "stability" or "fairness". For the entire life of EVE there have been massive imbalances in the game mechanics. Perhaps the game mechanics can be balanced and iterated on in a way that makes things better and does not create another super imbalance like Tech did. The fact that Tech has not been balanced in 4? years simply blows my mind. BETTER? Better in what way? why are massive imbalances a bad thing? I'm no goon fan boy, i don't think the cfc are anywhere near cool enough to run a tech empire, I'd far rather a group of suave brittish space pirates ran eve but that dosen't mean that the CFC having a monoploy is a bad thing.... Look this is eve, it's supposed to be a visceral, real world, why on earth would it be better if anyone and everyone could compete on an equal footing, build and sell whatever they like and make a profit? Why shouldn't some corps, some empires, take over certain markets, buy out the competition, control some resources? This is what we, the player base, are buying into, the kind of game where realistic market control are a possibility, the kind of game that encourages emergent gameplay. It's a tired old catchphrase but it's something that holds true for me. I'd quit in an instant if ccp started manufacturing rules that ensured lazy lone pilots without the comitment to forge a giant solar empire could vie with huge corperations for their slice of the market. What should happen in a sandbox game, as in real life, is nothing, until a group of players more determined, and more resourceful, come along and tipploe the goons tech empire. THAT, and only that, is the only acceptable solution in a sandbox, anything else would be artificialy imposed and at the expense of our freedom as a playerbase.
Captain Fandango wants the Tech Empire to be run by the Super Adventure Club Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
32
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 19:58:00 -
[117] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi.
Dont like tidi? You should try a battle of cointoss then, as was the system before tidi. Two groups enter, one group loads... Victory.
Tidi is the best thing that happened to eve |

Captain Fandango
The Primrose League
4
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 20:42:00 -
[118] - Quote
Quote:Captain Fandango wants the Tech Empire to be run by the Super Adventure Club
I want the tech empire to be run by Benjamin Disraeli and Sher Khan, but that is besides the point, I'm happy it exists, a world of enforced equal opportunity is a world that offers no incentives for truly hard work, no incentives for fighting to be the best or dedicating your time to bettering the competition. A world where everyone has to be equally capable of producing and marketing every mineral, resource and item in the game is a world that will not grow, change or develop. That is something to fear, not the evils of goonswarm.
Goonswarm can be fought. sure it wont be easy, sure it will require real effort, by a large number of players, and it will take a while to overcome peoples natrual lethargy and incite rebellion, but there can be no rebellion against stagnation once you've forced ccp to implement a 'fair game'policy that restricts cartels and monopolies, you will have forever forced dystopia upon yourselves, our world will be a shrivelled thing without ambition or drive. fear that, fear lethargy, not the activities of a player group that incite rage and vitriol, these are healthy things. |

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
530
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 20:54:00 -
[119] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi.
Just throwing out that my alliance, with less than 100 real people behind the chars, held a dozen Tech moons for about six months.
|

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
141
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:15:00 -
[120] - Quote
qDoctor Strangelove wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi. Dont like tidi? You should try a battle of cointoss then, as was the system before tidi. Two groups enter, one group loads... Victory. Tidi is the best thing that happened to eve
Or I could just not fight in 400man blobs. I PvP all day and never play in TiDi. If your fleets are causing TiDi, well maybe you should get some skills and quit masking the lack of with numbers. I gamed during the 90's but lag does not make me feel nostalgic. TiDi is just equal lag for everyone. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
666
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:23:00 -
[121] - Quote
And this is why the rest of you always lose. You only think about yourselves. The CFC isn't successful because there's a lot of Goons, but because we're one of the few alliances that builds effective relationships with allies that are not based on taking advantage of them. We don't see our allies as speed bumps in front of our enemies, or as pets or as burdens. They are our friends and we help each other out because of mutual respect and of course mutual self interest. We all benefit by working together instead of abandoning each other the moment someone comes to attack us.
You can whine and moan all you want about us having more money than... everyone but its up to you to come take it. You can't do that by yourself and its hilarious to see you only thinking in terms of yourself. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Mallak Azaria
282
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:31:00 -
[122] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside.
People are still mad over this? Using game mechanics isn't cheating. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
666
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:33:00 -
[123] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. People are still mad over this? Using game mechanics isn't cheating.
That and the fact we didn't infiltrate them. One of their own directors who had infiltrated us defected when he saw how much better life is in Goonswarm. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Xpaulusx
V I R I I Ineluctable.
50
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:44:00 -
[124] - Quote
Mfume Apocal wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi. Just throwing out that my alliance, with less than 100 real people behind the chars, held a dozen Tech moons for about six months. You would be surprised at even what 50 good pilots can do to a region. I'm not going to fight a war on your terms or in Delve or whatever, ill bring it right to your doorstep and make you life miserable, you numbers or isk won't matter either. thats how you fight superior numbers IMO. |

Generals4
966
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:46:00 -
[125] - Quote
As a response to the general feeling of helplesness towards CFC: As far as my bad intel goes the CFC blob is merely fighting an other Blob so why don't the two other big blobs join if CFC is that strong, evil and what not? If they manage to fight that off than yes maybe something is wrong. But until than all i see is a failure at caring enough to do efforts. -Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. |

Akirei Scytale
Test Alliance Please Ignore
1860
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:48:00 -
[126] - Quote
Xpaulusx wrote:Mfume Apocal wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi. Just throwing out that my alliance, with less than 100 real people behind the chars, held a dozen Tech moons for about six months. You would be surprised at even what 50 good pilots can do to a region. I'm not going to fight a war on your terms or in Delve or whatever, ill bring it right to your doorstep and make you life miserable, you numbers or isk won't matter either. thats how you fight superior numbers IMO.
Heh, you think goonswarm doesn't have good pilots. TEST Alliance BEST Alliance |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub Like I Give A F--K
1430
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:50:00 -
[127] - Quote
Generals4 wrote:As a response to the general feeling of helplesness towards CFC: As far as my bad intel goes the CFC blob is merely fighting an other Blob so why don't the two other big blobs join if CFC is that strong, evil and what not? If they manage to fight that off than yes maybe something is wrong. But until than all i see is a failure at caring enough to do efforts. Because the only people who are really that bothered about goons are high sec care bears.
And they don't have a blob, because they aren't social enough to form fleets or large alliances/corporations.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:52:00 -
[128] - Quote
For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
668
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:52:00 -
[129] - Quote
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Heh, you think goonswarm doesn't have good pilots.
We don't. Every one of our successes has been an accident. Someone else on this forum described us an entropic collective, which I think is pretty accurate. If it wasn't for PL holding our hands in this war we would have failed days ago. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
668
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:52:00 -
[130] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition.
Why are people always so upset that we have friends? You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
126
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:53:00 -
[131] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition.
why waste the isk having a war when you can blue up and make a monopoly? |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
668
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:54:00 -
[132] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Charles Baker wrote:For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition. why waste the isk having a war when you can blue up and make a monopoly?
You don't even have to be blue to do that, see O-Tech. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:55:00 -
[133] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Charles Baker wrote:For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition. why waste the isk having a war when you can blue up and make a monopoly?
Because it's no fun, speaking as a former FA pilot all we did was drop 200 man Hurricane gangs onto towers which didn't shoot back, well barring 2 or 3 stealthbombers.
and no i'm not mad that you have friends, i'm just mad that 'friends' seem to coincide with all major tech holders. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub Like I Give A F--K
1430
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:55:00 -
[134] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition. Weren't goons pretty small fry a few years back? Then they beat some guys called bob or something?
Nah, must have imagined it. I'm sure goons were formed straight away with over 9,000 members and technetium spewing out of every orifice.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
668
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:56:00 -
[135] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote: and no i'm not mad that you have friends, i'm just mad that 'friends' seem to coincide with all major tech holders.
Yeah that whole mutual self-interest thing. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
126
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:56:00 -
[136] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Dave stark wrote:Charles Baker wrote:For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition. why waste the isk having a war when you can blue up and make a monopoly? You don't even have to be blue to do that, see O-Tech.
but blue is my favourite colour. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
668
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:58:00 -
[137] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote: Weren't goons pretty small fry a few years back? Then they beat some guys called bob or something?
Pubbies will never accept the fact that we beat BoB. It will always be infiltration, or accident or yada yada... You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Angst IronShard
37
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 21:58:00 -
[138] - Quote
When all 0.0 will be in the hands of Goons, well, I wonder what will be the point to play at EvE :/
The sov system is a failure as many others game's mechanics. |

Mallak Azaria
282
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:00:00 -
[139] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. People are still mad over this? Using game mechanics isn't cheating. That and the fact we didn't infiltrate them. One of their own directors who had infiltrated us defected when he saw how much better life is in Goonswarm.
If memory serves correctly, BoB was already dead before this happened. It was a cremation of a neglected corpse that had been rotting for several months. |

Ping Pang Pong
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:04:00 -
[140] - Quote
Xython wrote:Spurty wrote: Not sure why everyone wants to fight over null sec ... People camping Jita undock / gates are ahead of the curve with regards to effort / risk / reward
Holding tech doesn't affect them. Only concern they have is that Jita doesn't get it's trillions of ISK brought in / out every few hours
Sure, if by effort and risk/reward you mean sitting there like a lump, waiting for people to be vulnerable while their client freezes and blanks out during undock, so you can kill them without any chance of them fighting back. "Leet Highsec PVP" I guess, but it doesn't hold a candle to anything in Nullsec.
And how is this any different than what DoucheSwarm and their pets are doing to SoCo right now? All I have seen from Goons and their pets is bitching and moaning that they can't get SoCo to undock and fight. Why would they undock when as soon as they do you cyno in a fleet that is 5-6x the size of theirs?
As I have stated in other threads the Goons and their pets are utterly pathetic at PvP, and will run at the first sign of a fair fight. By fair fight I mean an incoming fleet that is half their size or more. You have been taking massive losses whenever you do actually decide to engage in a fight, and that only happens when SoCo chases a fleet halfway around the universe.
The most fighting I see out of Goons and their pets is forum warrioring. Is it some kind of rule that whenever the goons are mentioned in a thread that you all dog pile your asshattery into them? |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
669
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:06:00 -
[141] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote: And how is this any different than what DoucheSwarm and their pets are doing to SoCo right now? All I have seen from Goons and their pets is bitching and moaning that they can't get SoCo to undock and fight. Why would they undock when as soon as they do you cyno in a fleet that is 5-6x the size of theirs?
As I have stated in other threads the Goons and their pets are utterly pathetic at PvP, and will run at the first sign of a fair fight. By fair fight I mean an incoming fleet that is half their size or more. You have been taking massive losses whenever you do actually decide to engage in a fight, and that only happens when SoCo chases a fleet halfway around the universe.
The most fighting I see out of Goons and their pets is forum warrioring. Is it some kind of rule that whenever the goons are mentioned in a thread that you all dog pile your asshattery into them?
You can post on your Soco main. Getting kicked out of your alliance for showing your real face is probably the best thing that could happen to you right now.
An anonymous forum alt talking about bravery is pretty hilarious. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:07:00 -
[142] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Charles Baker wrote:For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition. Weren't goons pretty small fry a few years back? Then they beat some guys called bob or something? Nah, must have imagined it. I'm sure goons were formed straight away with over 9,000 members and technetium spewing out of every orifice.
Years is a long time, they've been rather solid since TCF gave them Deklein. someone please shitpoast about how goon's didn't even have to seize their home systems by force. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
669
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:08:00 -
[143] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Charles Baker wrote:For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition. Weren't goons pretty small fry a few years back? Then they beat some guys called bob or something? Nah, must have imagined it. I'm sure goons were formed straight away with over 9,000 members and technetium spewing out of every orifice. Years is a long time, they've been rather solid since TCF gave them Deklein. someone please shitpoast about how goon's didn't even have to seize their home systems by force.
Yet another perk of treating your allies with genuine respect. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
533
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:09:00 -
[144] - Quote
Xpaulusx wrote:You would be surprised at even what 50 good pilots can do to a region. I'm not going to fight a war on your terms or in Delve or whatever, ill bring it right to your doorstep and make you life miserable, you numbers or isk won't matter either. thats how you fight superior numbers IMO.
I have no idea what this dude is talking about. |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:10:00 -
[145] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Charles Baker wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Charles Baker wrote:For everyone here saying that CFC fought hard for their tech, you are speaking out their arse, only reason CFC holds tech is because they blued anyone who could threaten their monopolic position, Goons could easily beat Test in a straight up war and Test could certainly trump FA, only reason they still hold their tech moons is because they are too cowardly to fight anyone and would rather form a rofl-stomping coalition. Weren't goons pretty small fry a few years back? Then they beat some guys called bob or something? Nah, must have imagined it. I'm sure goons were formed straight away with over 9,000 members and technetium spewing out of every orifice. Years is a long time, they've been rather solid since TCF gave them Deklein. someone please shitpoast about how goon's didn't even have to seize their home systems by force. Yet another perk of treating your allies with genuine respect.
Hardly allies, TCF were like your ******* parents, you just inherited their house when they died. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
669
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:13:00 -
[146] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:
Hardly allies, TCF were like your ******* parents, you just inherited their house when they died.
Not really sure why you consider this a bad thing. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |

Sarah Schneider
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
1390
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:15:00 -
[147] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote: Weren't goons pretty small fry a few years back? Then they beat some guys called bob or something?
Pubbies will never accept the fact that we beat BoB. It will always be infiltration, or accident or yada yada... Nah, they think that winning wars is about winning fleet battles and who has the bigger assets to throw around. Don't like spaceships sandbox? then this is not the game for you. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
23
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:15:00 -
[148] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Charles Baker wrote:
Hardly allies, TCF were like your ******* parents, you just inherited their house when they died.
Not really sure why you consider this a bad thing.
You didn't earn it. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
507
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:17:00 -
[149] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Charles Baker wrote:
Hardly allies, TCF were like your ******* parents, you just inherited their house when they died.
Not really sure why you consider this a bad thing. You didn't earn it.
Beats being homeless doesn't it?
Edit: Can I pull myself up by your bootstraps, Charles? Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
23
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:20:00 -
[150] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Charles Baker wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Charles Baker wrote:
Hardly allies, TCF were like your ******* parents, you just inherited their house when they died.
Not really sure why you consider this a bad thing. You didn't earn it. Beats being homeless doesn't it? Edit: Can I pull myself up by your bootstraps, Charles?
I always saw myself as the figure who would unite the pubbies, and lead a glorious crusade 3 jumps into null before my fleet got a bout of cowardice and decided to return to their belts. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
507
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:23:00 -
[151] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Charles Baker wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Charles Baker wrote:
Hardly allies, TCF were like your ******* parents, you just inherited their house when they died.
Not really sure why you consider this a bad thing. You didn't earn it. Beats being homeless doesn't it? Edit: Can I pull myself up by your bootstraps, Charles? I always saw myself as the figure who would unite the pubbies, and lead a glorious crusade 3 jumps into null before my fleet got a bout of cowardice and decided to return to their belts.
I guess it truly is tough to talk a big game when your game consists of shooting inanimate rocks all day. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
24
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:26:00 -
[152] - Quote
Well of course, this is GD don't you know, but in all honesty isn't that what you guys do in null? except you guys dock up the second a cloaky enters system. Nothing sillier than seeing a 100 Hulk operation halted by a single Tengu.
|

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
33
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:47:00 -
[153] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:Well of course, this is GD don't you know, but in all honesty isn't that what you guys do in null? except you guys dock up the second a cloaky enters system. Nothing sillier than seeing a 100 Hulk operation halted by a single Tengu.
100 hulks? That is 500 medium ecm drones Do wonder what such a blob is running from.
AFK cloakers are no problem. Problem comes with covert cynos.
Anyway .. OP: How do YOU think Tech price got to where tey are today? They were set, by a crew that knows how to play the game...
There are several other parts of eve were major isk is to be had if you arrange for a treaty.
Any alliance should be able to take total control of incursion sites for example... And squeeze quite a lot of isk out from releasing them for public use.. |

Bolow Santosi
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 22:51:00 -
[154] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Charles Baker wrote:
Hardly allies, TCF were like your ******* parents, you just inherited their house when they died.
Not really sure why you consider this a bad thing. You didn't earn it.
The attempted VFK headshot never happened and we definitely didn't rampage all over Venal, Tenal and Fountain |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1280
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 23:00:00 -
[155] - Quote
Xpaulusx wrote:Mfume Apocal wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi. Just throwing out that my alliance, with less than 100 real people behind the chars, held a dozen Tech moons for about six months. You would be surprised at even what 50 good pilots can do to a region. I'm not going to fight a war on your terms or in Delve or whatever, ill bring it right to your doorstep and make you life miserable, you numbers or isk won't matter either. thats how you fight superior numbers IMO.
the mighty V I R I I corp makes us tremble in our sleep a rogue goon |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
285
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 23:13:00 -
[156] - Quote
Xpaulusx wrote:Mfume Apocal wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi. Just throwing out that my alliance, with less than 100 real people behind the chars, held a dozen Tech moons for about six months. You would be surprised at even what 50 good pilots can do to a region. I'm not going to fight a war on your terms or in Delve or whatever, ill bring it right to your doorstep and make you life miserable, you numbers or isk won't matter either. thats how you fight superior numbers IMO.
You should hit up Mine Lady, see if she can help you in your noble cause. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Desimus Maximus
Dark Matter Arsenal Development
15
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 00:10:00 -
[157] - Quote
We don't call them CCPswarm for nothing.
I do agree. Tech should be a travelling resource. Make them scout out areas and scan moons, this will give CCP their deepest desire to increase hostile action.
It's clear that the situation will never change without CCP action. In-game, it is about as likely to happen as Mittens admitting his membership in NAMBLA. |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 00:17:00 -
[158] - Quote
Desimus Maximus wrote: I do agree. Tech should be a travelling resource. Make them scout out areas and scan moons, this will give CCP their deepest desire to increase hostile action.
This would increase the price of technetium threefold. Sure, it would be impossible to cartel, but it would require scanning hundred of thousands of moons and dropping new towers every x months. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
507
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 00:18:00 -
[159] - Quote
Desimus Maximus wrote:We don't call them CCPswarm for nothing.
I do agree. Tech should be a travelling resource. Make them scout out areas and scan moons, this will give CCP their deepest desire to increase hostile action.
It's clear that the situation will never change without CCP action. In-game, it is about as likely to happen as Mittens admitting his membership in NAMBLA.
Wow, okay, I didn't even notice that last part, enjoy your ban, bro. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
172
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 00:20:00 -
[160] - Quote
When tech is nerfed set all wallets to zero. That would level the playing field... |

Secluse
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 00:24:00 -
[161] - Quote
Came with popcorn. Was disappoint. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
190
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 00:29:00 -
[162] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1.
I do believe they tried that.... and got hammered down when the wardec costs were (totally unasked for by the corp in question) changed.
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Unit757
North Point Cannabis Legionis
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 00:32:00 -
[163] - Quote
If one Alliance/Coalition having all the tech moons is such an "issue", then take it from them? |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1280
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 00:33:00 -
[164] - Quote
Unit757 wrote:If one Alliance/Coalition having all the tech moons is such an "issue", then take it from them?
"But you can't fight extremely rich alliances despite the numerous examples of rich, powerful alliances being taken down by coalitions of less powerful ones!" a rogue goon |

Unit757
North Point Cannabis Legionis
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 00:35:00 -
[165] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Unit757 wrote:If one Alliance/Coalition having all the tech moons is such an "issue", then take it from them? "But you can't fight extremely rich alliances despite the numerous examples of rich, powerful alliances being taken down by coalitions of less powerful ones!"
Don't see how that's the CFC's fault then. So much hate for no reason  |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
160
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 01:01:00 -
[166] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Ping Pang Pong wrote: And how is this any different than what DoucheSwarm and their pets are doing to SoCo right now? All I have seen from Goons and their pets is bitching and moaning that they can't get SoCo to undock and fight. Why would they undock when as soon as they do you cyno in a fleet that is 5-6x the size of theirs?
As I have stated in other threads the Goons and their pets are utterly pathetic at PvP, and will run at the first sign of a fair fight. By fair fight I mean an incoming fleet that is half their size or more. You have been taking massive losses whenever you do actually decide to engage in a fight, and that only happens when SoCo chases a fleet halfway around the universe.
The most fighting I see out of Goons and their pets is forum warrioring. Is it some kind of rule that whenever the goons are mentioned in a thread that you all dog pile your asshattery into them?
You can post on your Soco main. Getting kicked out of your alliance for showing your real face is probably the best thing that could happen to you right now. An anonymous forum alt talking about bravery is pretty hilarious.
What makes you think we need forum alts? |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 01:04:00 -
[167] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Ping Pang Pong wrote: And how is this any different than what DoucheSwarm and their pets are doing to SoCo right now? All I have seen from Goons and their pets is bitching and moaning that they can't get SoCo to undock and fight. Why would they undock when as soon as they do you cyno in a fleet that is 5-6x the size of theirs?
As I have stated in other threads the Goons and their pets are utterly pathetic at PvP, and will run at the first sign of a fair fight. By fair fight I mean an incoming fleet that is half their size or more. You have been taking massive losses whenever you do actually decide to engage in a fight, and that only happens when SoCo chases a fleet halfway around the universe.
The most fighting I see out of Goons and their pets is forum warrioring. Is it some kind of rule that whenever the goons are mentioned in a thread that you all dog pile your asshattery into them?
You can post on your Soco main. Getting kicked out of your alliance for showing your real face is probably the best thing that could happen to you right now. An anonymous forum alt talking about bravery is pretty hilarious. What makes you think we need forum alts?
Because all your mains are docked up.
|

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 01:06:00 -
[168] - Quote
Unit757 wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Unit757 wrote:If one Alliance/Coalition having all the tech moons is such an "issue", then take it from them? "But you can't fight extremely rich alliances despite the numerous examples of rich, powerful alliances being taken down by coalitions of less powerful ones!" Don't see how that's the CFC's fault then. So much hate for no reason 
So jealousy isn't a reason? ;P |

Unit757
North Point Cannabis Legionis
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 01:13:00 -
[169] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:Unit757 wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Unit757 wrote:If one Alliance/Coalition having all the tech moons is such an "issue", then take it from them? "But you can't fight extremely rich alliances despite the numerous examples of rich, powerful alliances being taken down by coalitions of less powerful ones!" Don't see how that's the CFC's fault then. So much hate for no reason  So jealousy isn't a reason? ;P
Not a good one at least. |

Delvega
The Geedunk Expedition
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 01:13:00 -
[170] - Quote
dexington wrote: There is probably only two ways to get 10% to leave empire space, the carrot or the whip. Seeing how there is nothing that comes close to being a carrot, nothing is happening unless ccp nerf empire space to hell.
The carrot is to lure players into a specific location.
The whip just drives players away from their current location but doesn't necessarily get them moving towards where the whip cracker wants them to go. That's the logical fallacy of the whip and why nerfing highsec is such a **** poor idea.
Make life in highsec so unbearable and several things will happen. Those players will either go to nullsec which is what you want, or they'll go to wormholes, or lowsec, or the most likely destination is to the account management page.
If you want players to leave highsec and go into other areas of space, try to come up with an alternate solution that doesn't involve mass unsubs. |

drdxie
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
134
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 01:44:00 -
[171] - Quote
Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it.
No you didn't... check with the older null players. Tech was put there after goons had the space
Missile enhancers.. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1235061& |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
287
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 02:00:00 -
[172] - Quote
drdxie wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. No you didn't... check with the older null players. Tech was put there after goons had the space
Dominion (when CCP nerfed R64s and signaled the ascendancy of the Tech Era) was in late 2009.
Here's Verite's map for November 2009 (a month or so after the R64 Nerf/Tech Buff)
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20091126.png
Goonswarm is down in Querius and Delve, nowhere near Tech. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
534
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 02:25:00 -
[173] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:the mighty V I R I I corp makes us tremble in our sleep
Just so we're clear, what I was saying was nothing like the "wulfpax their space!!!1" he was getting at. |

Delnas Sapphire
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 02:28:00 -
[174] - Quote
Soco being fined for talking in local? Soco being told to shut up everytime they speak in TS? Soco having maka whelp fleets everytime he undocks? Soco having mandatory ops and directors chewing corps out if someone misses one?
You wonder why people don't beat GS, this is just one war and the reason they are winning is because they aren't full of ****** rules and are actually able to enjoy themselves whilst other 0.0 entities act like a dictatorship.
Once alliances start to realize treating your members like **** doesn't work they might actually be able to mount a proper offensive. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
190
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 04:18:00 -
[175] - Quote
Delvega wrote:dexington wrote: There is probably only two ways to get 10% to leave empire space, the carrot or the whip. Seeing how there is nothing that comes close to being a carrot, nothing is happening unless ccp nerf empire space to hell.
The carrot is to lure players into a specific location. The whip just drives players away from their current location but doesn't necessarily get them moving towards where the whip cracker wants them to go. That's the logical fallacy of the whip and why nerfing highsec is such a **** poor idea. Make life in highsec so unbearable and several things will happen. Those players will either go to nullsec which is what you want, or they'll go to wormholes, or lowsec, or the most likely destination is to the account management page. If you want players to leave highsec and go into other areas of space, try to come up with an alternate solution that doesn't involve mass unsubs.
Yeah pretty much, nerf high enough Ill find a new game (MWO), Im doubt Im alone.
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
190
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 04:19:00 -
[176] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:drdxie wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. No you didn't... check with the older null players. Tech was put there after goons had the space Dominion (when CCP nerfed R64s and signaled the ascendancy of the Tech Era) was in late 2009. Here's Verite's map for November 2009 (a month or so after the R64 Nerf/Tech Buff) http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20091126.pngGoonswarm is down in Querius and Delve, nowhere near Tech.
Careful; youre bordering rumor there also; they dissapeared from there, only to reappear where the tech moons ARE and IT took over the old area.
http://youtu.be/RhxV_VjtqkI
2:58 then reappear at the new location 3:38 Note that proof negates rumor, and that Im not saying theres any conspiracy, just that it happened. http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
289
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 04:39:00 -
[177] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:drdxie wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. No you didn't... check with the older null players. Tech was put there after goons had the space Dominion (when CCP nerfed R64s and signaled the ascendancy of the Tech Era) was in late 2009. Here's Verite's map for November 2009 (a month or so after the R64 Nerf/Tech Buff) http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20091126.pngGoonswarm is down in Querius and Delve, nowhere near Tech. Careful; youre bordering rumor there also; they dissapeared from there, only to reappear where the tech moons ARE and IT took over the old area. http://youtu.be/RhxV_VjtqkI2:58 then reappear at the new location 3:38 Note that proof negates rumor, and that Im not saying theres any conspiracy, just that it happened.
Right, but they certainly weren't there before Tech was buffed, as the above poster claimed. http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20100203EE.png The lost Sov Feb 3, 2010, 2 months after Dominion and the r64 nerf/Tech buff.
They didn't gain Sov in Dekklin until August 2010, 8 months after the r64 nerf/Tech buff.
8 months after != before.
As you say, proof negates rumor.
EDIT: Would be nice to have a list of all of Verite's maps. EvEfiles truncates at a couple hundred, and its search function works poorly for finding Verite's maps. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
190
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 04:59:00 -
[178] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:drdxie wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. No you didn't... check with the older null players. Tech was put there after goons had the space Dominion (when CCP nerfed R64s and signaled the ascendancy of the Tech Era) was in late 2009. Here's Verite's map for November 2009 (a month or so after the R64 Nerf/Tech Buff) http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20091126.pngGoonswarm is down in Querius and Delve, nowhere near Tech. Careful; youre bordering rumor there also; they dissapeared from there, only to reappear where the tech moons ARE and IT took over the old area. http://youtu.be/RhxV_VjtqkI2:58 then reappear at the new location 3:38 Note that proof negates rumor, and that Im not saying theres any conspiracy, just that it happened. Right, but they certainly weren't there before Tech was buffed, as the above poster claimed. http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20100203EE.pngThe lost Sov Feb 3, 2010, 2 months after Dominion and the r64 nerf/Tech buff. They didn't gain Sov in Dekklin until August 2010, 8 months after the r64 nerf/Tech buff. 8 months after != before. As you say, proof negates rumor. EDIT: Would be nice to have a list of all of Verite's maps. EvEfiles truncates at a couple hundred, and its search function works poorly for finding Verite's maps.
again... as I said... I WASNT rumormongering as the above poster was. I dont like being banned http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1159
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 05:04:00 -
[179] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Dominion (when CCP nerfed R64s and signaled the ascendancy of the Tech Era) was in late 2009. Here's Verite's map for November 2009 (a month or so after the R64 Nerf/Tech Buff) http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20091126.pngGoonswarm is down in Querius and Delve, nowhere near Tech. Careful; youre bordering rumor there also; they dissapeared from there, only to reappear where the tech moons ARE and IT took over the old area. http://youtu.be/RhxV_VjtqkI2:58 then reappear at the new location 3:38 Note that proof negates rumor, and that Im not saying theres any conspiracy, just that it happened. Right, but they certainly weren't there before Tech was buffed, as the above poster claimed. http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20100203EE.pngThe lost Sov Feb 3, 2010, 2 months after Dominion and the r64 nerf/Tech buff. They didn't gain Sov in Dekklin until August 2010, 8 months after the r64 nerf/Tech buff. 8 months after != before. As you say, proof negates rumor. EDIT: Would be nice to have a list of all of Verite's maps. EvEfiles truncates at a couple hundred, and its search function works poorly for finding Verite's maps. The tech cartel thing only occurred relatively recently too. Funny that the nerf is already expected in winter or so.
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Dersk
90040045
90
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 05:09:00 -
[180] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:EDIT: Would be nice to have a list of all of Verite's maps. EvEfiles truncates at a couple hundred, and its search function works poorly for finding Verite's maps.
You can just change the date in the URLs.
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20091126.png = november 26, 2009. Easy. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
289
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 05:17:00 -
[181] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote: again... as I said... I WASNT rumormongering as the above poster was. I dont like being banned
Ah, I'm sorry. The way the quote's nested, I thought you were warning me about rumors and agreeing with the guy I quoted. My bad. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
289
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 05:22:00 -
[182] - Quote
Dersk wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:EDIT: Would be nice to have a list of all of Verite's maps. EvEfiles truncates at a couple hundred, and its search function works poorly for finding Verite's maps. You can just change the date in the URLs. http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20091126.png = november 26, 2009. Easy.
That's great if you have a date in mind, less great if you want to browse through occasional entries to find an event you had in mind.
It'll work, it's just kludgy. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
190
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 06:50:00 -
[183] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Dersk wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:EDIT: Would be nice to have a list of all of Verite's maps. EvEfiles truncates at a couple hundred, and its search function works poorly for finding Verite's maps. You can just change the date in the URLs. http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20091126.png = november 26, 2009. Easy. That's great if you have a date in mind, less great if you want to browse through occasional entries to find an event you had in mind. It'll work, it's just kludgy.
eh? thats a dev in a company called Kerberos Software
http://www.kerberos-productions.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1008
lol http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
869
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 07:23:00 -
[184] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. I do believe they tried that.... and got hammered down when the wardec costs were (totally unasked for by the corp in question) changed.
What? So you all thought you could wardec GSF, have a hisec war and win tech moons? Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1159
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 07:26:00 -
[185] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. I do believe they tried that.... and got hammered down when the wardec costs were (totally unasked for by the corp in question) changed. What? So you all thought you could wardec GSF, have a hisec war and win tech moons? Our tech moons just outside Jita 4-4, a little past the statue, to the right, you see it?
It's the thing that looks like its making an obscene gesture. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
190
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 07:35:00 -
[186] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. I do believe they tried that.... and got hammered down when the wardec costs were (totally unasked for by the corp in question) changed. What? So you all thought you could wardec GSF, have a hisec war and win tech moons?
no I think they thought they could ... what was it GSF said...?
Oh yeah "bring it"... but apparently CCP disagreed
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Prince Kobol
600
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 07:36:00 -
[187] - Quote
Here is the thing, in any war you want allies.
The more allies you have the better chance of success. The Goons have shown that not only are they very at gathering allies but they are also very good at keeping those allies within the CFC happy.
From my own personal experience and of those people I know who have flown in both the North and South is that the Goon treat their allies, friends and renters fairly well where as the guys in the south treat there allies, friends and renters like ****.
As long as this continues the CFC will continue to grow and flourish where as others like Solar, -A- will stagnate and lose members.
Then the issue of numbers comes into the argument. Any chance this might have to do with CFC members actually wanting to fight for their allies without having to be told to fight like so many others.
Until the other coalitions learn that whilst you keep treating your allies, renters, friends like **** you will never be able to beat the CFC.
At the moment as much as it pains me to say this, currently the only way I can see the CFC losing is if they turn against each other which is very unlikely.
I can see the likes of Solar and -A- turning on each other long before the CFC do.
|

adam smash
University of Caille Gallente Federation
108
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 07:55:00 -
[188] - Quote
gota love all the tears.
Plain and simple here how did the USA "beat" russia in the cold war
O right we out spent them.
Holding all that tech... you can outspend anyone. As said... it is a **** mechanic.
Also last time I checked... MM and the like never banded like 90% of null togeather. You had the NC and the SC...
And ya bob never lost, they died to stupid game mechanics. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
190
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 08:00:00 -
[189] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Here is the thing, in any war you want allies.
The more allies you have the better chance of success. The Goons have shown that not only are they very at gathering allies but they are also very good at keeping those allies within the CFC happy.
From my own personal experience and of those people I know who have flown in both the North and South is that the Goon treat their allies, friends and renters fairly well where as the guys in the south treat there allies, friends and renters like ****.
As long as this continues the CFC will continue to grow and flourish where as others like Solar, -A- will stagnate and lose members.
Then the issue of numbers comes into the argument. Any chance this might have to do with CFC members actually wanting to fight for their allies without having to be told to fight like so many others.
Until the other coalitions learn that whilst you keep treating your allies, renters, friends like **** you will never be able to beat the CFC.
At the moment as much as it pains me to say this, currently the only way I can see the CFC losing is if they turn against each other which is very unlikely.
I can see the likes of Solar and -A- turning on each other long before the CFC do.
cant wait till 0.0 shows all CFC lol http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Mithrantir Ob'lontra
Ixion Defence Systems Tactical Narcotics Team
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 08:01:00 -
[190] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi. Your alliance (which apparently forbids posting in EVE-Online forums) can make deals and pacts with other alliances too.
Which apparently is too much effort, thus the golden oldie excuse of CFC blobbing the crap out of anyone going against us.
|

Mithrantir Ob'lontra
Ixion Defence Systems Tactical Narcotics Team
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 09:15:00 -
[191] - Quote
Angst IronShard wrote:When all 0.0 will be in the hands of Goons, well, I wonder what will be the point to play at EvE :/
The sov system is a failure as many others game's mechanics. I am pretty sure that you rate as a failure every mechanic in this game that doesn't help you gain an advantage over the rest of the players.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 09:19:00 -
[192] - Quote
Mithrantir Ob'lontra wrote:Angst IronShard wrote:When all 0.0 will be in the hands of Goons, well, I wonder what will be the point to play at EvE :/
The sov system is a failure as many others game's mechanics. I am pretty sure that you rate as a failure every mechanic in this game that doesn't help you gain an advantage over the rest of the players. Tech is a great success of a mechanic.
Please nerf it, tia. Titans as well. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 09:21:00 -
[193] - Quote
Mithrantir Ob'lontra wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xinivrae wrote:
That right there, that "it's impossible, don't bother to try" mentality is what's keeping you down.
Riiiight, cause my 250 man alliance stands a real good chance in a war for assets against the tens of thousnads of members of the CFC. Every time one of your gangs comes through we destroy it (in admittedly usually good fights), but I am not delusional enough to think we could even make a stand in a real war. You out number us 100 to 1, an some of us don't enjoy playing in TiDi. Your alliance (which apparently forbids posting in EVE-Online forums) can make deals and pacts with other alliances too. Which apparently is too much effort, thus the golden oldie excuse of CFC blobbing the crap out of anyone going against us. You bring anything I don't like, I dock.
You don't want fights, fine. Dock up, dock up. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Lord Zim
985
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 09:23:00 -
[194] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Rico Minali wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. I do believe they tried that.... and got hammered down when the wardec costs were (totally unasked for by the corp in question) changed. What? So you all thought you could wardec GSF, have a hisec war and win tech moons? no I think they thought they could ... what was it GSF said...? Oh yeah "bring it"... but apparently CCP disagreed Oh and that was TOTALLY unasked for by GSF too. The GSF didn't ask for any wardec changes, in fact the only effects we see of the wardec changes are fewer evemail spam notifications of privateer alliance, the 0rphanage (except they disbanded yesterday :laffo:) etc initiating week #2347 of wardecs against us, and then proceed to do nothing but sit at jita 4-4 and cull our dumber members who haven't learned to use neutral alts yet.
I'm torn as to whether the loss of evemail spam is worth our dumber members not getting a very necessary schooling in how to travel around in hisec. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 09:27:00 -
[195] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:The GSF didn't ask for any wardec changes, in fact the only effects we see of the wardec changes are fewer evemail spam notifications of privateer alliance, the 0rphanage (except they disbanded yesterday :laffo:) etc initiating week #2347 of wardecs against us, and then proceed to do nothing but sit at jita 4-4 and cull our dumber members who haven't learned to use neutral alts yet.
I'm torn as to whether the loss of evemail spam is worth our dumber members not getting a very necessary schooling in how to travel around in hisec. I liked jumping through camps of WTs in my covert ops ship. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
60
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 10:08:00 -
[196] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote: The GSF didn't ask for any wardec changes, in fact the only effects we see of the wardec changes are fewer evemail spam notifications of privateer alliance, the 0rphanage (except they disbanded yesterday :laffo:) etc initiating week #2347 of wardecs against us, and then proceed to do nothing but sit at jita 4-4 and cull our dumber members who haven't learned to use neutral alts yet.
I'm torn as to whether the loss of evemail spam is worth our dumber members not getting a very necessary schooling in how to travel around in hisec.
Didn't anyone tell you, 0rphange are (were, wololololol) elite pvp  "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
160
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 10:32:00 -
[197] - Quote
Delnas Sapphire wrote:Soco being fined for talking in local? Soco being told to shut up everytime they speak in TS? Soco having maka whelp fleets everytime he undocks? Soco having mandatory ops and directors chewing corps out if someone misses one?
You wonder why people don't beat GS, this is just one war and the reason they are winning is because they aren't full of ****** rules and are actually able to enjoy themselves whilst other 0.0 entities act like a dictatorship.
Once alliances start to realize treating your members like **** doesn't work they might actually be able to mount a proper offensive.
Huh?
You aren't supposed to yap in local in fleet, this far from unique to SoCo. It's more about class. People get told to shut up in fleets, specifically if they are backdoor FCing. You want to FC put up a fleet, nothing is stopping you. Otherwise, its pretty much die quietly, follow orders and don't bump the titan. If by whelp you mean lose ships to superior numbers.....Meh. We come out ahead in 9:10 engagements. The only BRdocs Ive seen were the Loki fleet you guys zerged 4 : 1 and C3N
What mandatory OPs? There was nothing after C3N and even I have never seen people taking attendance. It may be a corp thing, but we aren't out here to rat, if there is a CTA fleet up. I' ve never heard of attendance being taken, we are an international alliance, people have jobs NO ONE makes every CTA for a campaign. Can we try to keep it at least slightly within reason. |

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
60
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 10:48:00 -
[198] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Delnas Sapphire wrote:Soco being fined for talking in local? Soco being told to shut up everytime they speak in TS? Soco having maka whelp fleets everytime he undocks? Soco having mandatory ops and directors chewing corps out if someone misses one?
You wonder why people don't beat GS, this is just one war and the reason they are winning is because they aren't full of ****** rules and are actually able to enjoy themselves whilst other 0.0 entities act like a dictatorship.
Once alliances start to realize treating your members like **** doesn't work they might actually be able to mount a proper offensive. Huh? You aren't supposed to yap in local in fleet, this far from unique to SoCo. It's more about class. People get told to shut up in fleets, specifically if they are backdoor FCing. You want to FC put up a fleet, nothing is stopping you. Otherwise, its pretty much die quietly, follow orders and don't bump the titan. If by whelp you mean lose ships to superior numbers.....Meh. We come out ahead in 9:10 engagements. The only BRdocs Ive seen were the Loki fleet you guys zerged 4 : 1 and C3N What mandatory OPs? There was nothing after C3N and even I have never seen people taking attendance. It may be a corp thing, but we aren't out here to rat, if there is a CTA fleet up. I' ve never heard of attendance being taken, we are an international alliance, people have jobs NO ONE makes every CTA for a campaign. Can we try to keep it at least slightly within reason.
http://soundcloud.com/dariush_records/soco-fight-07-07
Your FCs write our propaganda for us. "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

Prince Kobol
600
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 11:46:00 -
[199] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Here is the thing, in any war you want allies.
The more allies you have the better chance of success. The Goons have shown that not only are they very at gathering allies but they are also very good at keeping those allies within the CFC happy.
From my own personal experience and of those people I know who have flown in both the North and South is that the Goon treat their allies, friends and renters fairly well where as the guys in the south treat there allies, friends and renters like ****.
As long as this continues the CFC will continue to grow and flourish where as others like Solar, -A- will stagnate and lose members.
Then the issue of numbers comes into the argument. Any chance this might have to do with CFC members actually wanting to fight for their allies without having to be told to fight like so many others.
Until the other coalitions learn that whilst you keep treating your allies, renters, friends like **** you will never be able to beat the CFC.
At the moment as much as it pains me to say this, currently the only way I can see the CFC losing is if they turn against each other which is very unlikely.
I can see the likes of Solar and -A- turning on each other long before the CFC do.
cant wait till 0.0 shows all CFC lol
and yet as it currently stands it will not happen simply because all the other alliances are incredibly paranoid that everybody is a spy and treat everybody like ****. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
796
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 11:50:00 -
[200] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. I do believe they tried that.... and got hammered down when the wardec costs were (totally unasked for by the corp in question) changed.
I do believe that war declarations are not a requirement for combat in Null Sec, which is where the alliances live, no? Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
299
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 12:01:00 -
[201] - Quote
Xython wrote:AlleyKat wrote:Only difference is that BoB actually had the respect and the money, instead of just the money.
BoB. Respect? Ow. My sense of irony just sprained itself.
It wasn't open to debate; attempting to rewrite history will not erase my memory.
It also was not my intention to remind you of painful truths to offend you; sorry if that was the impression you got.
AK
GÇ£You go into combat, and itGÇÖs NOT going to be WagnerGǪindustrial techno or really hard drum and bassGÇ¥ Reynir Hardarson, founding member of CCP Games, 2002.
somethingjustgotreal.com |

Jonah Gravenstein
582
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 12:06:00 -
[202] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. I do believe they tried that.... and got hammered down when the wardec costs were (totally unasked for by the corp in question) changed. I do believe that war declarations are not a requirement for combat in Null Sec, which is where the alliances live, no?
Shhh don't say things like that, it'll burst some bubbles
I think some posters are butthurt that Jade Constantine did a better job of rallying a force against GSF than most of the null alliances have ever managed, even if it was down to a poorly thought out ally mechanic. There I said it, Jade Constantine > some null alliances, man am I going to burn for that one.
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Kerensky White
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 12:13:00 -
[203] - Quote
Onictus wrote:We don't play your game.
I play Minecraft, FFXI, TF2, soon Planetside 2 I hope! You should try them. Well ok maybe not FFXI it is still abit like slamming bits of yourself in a car door though they did make it a lot easier to level up. Seriously like very little grind for that now. I play a mithra because they are cute cat girls and when I play summoner, I get the best pets. Oh I guess this is what you all mean by goon pets!
|

Togg Bott
One Clone Gang
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 12:33:00 -
[204] - Quote
you know... typically i dont particularly care for or hate the Goons. but for people to get butthurt over the fact that they have and defend a huge swath of moon goo, is stupid.
calling for CCP to take it away from the Goons is just plain crazy. if you feel strongly enough about it... get all the other alliances out there NOT associated with the Goons and go take it from them.
Bad as i hate to say this, i agree with the Goons. its theirs, its their right to hold,defend and PROFIT on it. |

Lord Zim
988
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 12:39:00 -
[205] - Quote
Onictus wrote:You aren't supposed to yap in local in fleet, this far from unique to SoCo. It's more about class. ahahahahaha no it isn't, not yapping in local is literally stifling fun.
I mean, have you seen all the high-class **** to come out of local? Share the wealth, man. Puff puff pass. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1162
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 13:02:00 -
[206] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Onictus wrote:You aren't supposed to yap in local in fleet, this far from unique to SoCo. It's more about class. ahahahahaha no it isn't, not yapping in local is literally stifling fun. I mean, have you seen all the high-class **** to come out of local? Share the wealth, man. Puff puff pass. All the best stuff isn't even in game.
It's things like ... Makalu FCing comms leaks, hilarious posts on Kugu, the broadcasts written by amazing posters. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

March rabbit
R.I.P. Legion Red Alliance
210
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 13:26:00 -
[207] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:I hear we also got CCP to break bombs to win this war. jokes aside now your blob can't be countered. And when your 300-500+ drake fleet is sitting outside of a station nothing below this numbers can get your out. Before this "fix" there was conter to blobs - SB gangs. Not it is not exists.
Was watching few days ago how some fleet undocked and started fight. Immediately you droped lots of dreads/supers/titans on it. 
Local was like 750-800 and there was like 100 in RED alliance channel. I can guess 100-200 more people were from SoCo.
Just to answer to your "SoCo never undocks".... They do but not against your swarms.  |

Bolow Santosi
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 13:32:00 -
[208] - Quote
AlleyKat wrote:Xython wrote:AlleyKat wrote:Only difference is that BoB actually had the respect and the money, instead of just the money.
BoB. Respect? Ow. My sense of irony just sprained itself. It wasn't open to debate; attempting to rewrite history will not erase my memory. It also was not my intention to remind you of painful truths to offend you; sorry if that was the impression you got. AK
Yes because propping yourself up as some quasi feudal lord and deeming nullsec is for the elite only was a good, healthy and respectable mindset. |

Lord Zim
989
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 13:35:00 -
[209] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:KrakizBad wrote:I hear we also got CCP to break bombs to win this war. jokes aside now your blob can't be countered. This is a fallacy. Prior to us saying "we're heading south to burn your **** to the ground", you guys had 800+ in fleet. 2 days after, and it was "wololol retreat to NPC stain".
March rabbit wrote:And when your 300-500+ drake fleet is sitting outside of a station nothing below this numbers can get your out. Before this "fix" there was conter to blobs - SB gangs. Not it is not exists. SBs aren't nerfed, they're changed back to what they had before CCP ****** with missiles etc, which means you have to actually think a bit before lobbing bombs, instead of essentially doing a 256 man bombing run which is able to put aeons into armor in one volley.
March rabbit wrote:Was watching few days ago how some fleet undocked and started fight. Immediately you droped lots of dreads/supers/titans on it.  We're not there for good fights, we're there to burn your **** to the ground. Deal with it by throwing away makalu get someone competent to actually plan your war for you. Constantly being camped in 319 and following makalu 'yipe yipe yipe' zarya isn't going to work. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
507
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 14:32:00 -
[210] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:KrakizBad wrote:I hear we also got CCP to break bombs to win this war. jokes aside now your blob can't be countered. And when your 300-500+ drake fleet is sitting outside of a station nothing below this numbers can get your out. Before this "fix" there was conter to blobs - SB gangs. Not it is not exists. Was watching few days ago how some fleet undocked and started fight. Immediately you droped lots of dreads/supers/titans on it.  Local was like 750-800 and there was like 100 in RED alliance channel. I can guess 100-200 more people were from SoCo. Just to answer to your "SoCo never undocks".... They do but not against your swarms. 
Because GSF has never used bomber gangs to counter BS fleets in the past when bombs weren't broken.
Can we get Mr. Vee in here? Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
115
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 14:41:00 -
[211] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Because GSF has never used bomber gangs to counter BS fleets in the past when bombs weren't broken.
Can we get Mr. Vee in here?
No, it's only unfair to people who are bad with bombers and need to use a patching error to make them work.
|

March rabbit
R.I.P. Legion Red Alliance
211
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 15:06:00 -
[212] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote: This is a fallacy. Prior to us saying "we're heading south to burn your **** to the ground", you guys had 800+ in fleet. 2 days after, and it was "wololol retreat to NPC stain".
i'm new to Eve (second year in 0.0 sov)... Have only seen 150-200 fleets.... And like 500+ from you (switch forum char, you lost mark "CFC pet"). Where did you see 800+ in fleet? 
Lord Zim wrote: SBs aren't nerfed, they're changed back to what they had before CCP ****** with missiles etc, which means you have to actually think a bit before lobbing bombs, instead of essentially doing a 256 man bombing run which is able to put aeons into armor in one volley.
Not really. In theory bombs should be used in groups by 7 at a time. Then attack can destroy BS. Now you launch 1 bomb at a time. 1 bomb can't even blow frigate without MWD... So i'm not sure what is purpose of SBs these days Only if target will sit there and wait for next SB attack.... and next....
Lord Zim wrote:March rabbit wrote:Was watching few days ago how some fleet undocked and started fight. Immediately you droped lots of dreads/supers/titans on it.  We're not there for good fights, we're there to burn your **** to the ground. Deal with it by throwing away makalu get someone competent to actually plan your war for you. Constantly being camped in 319 and following makalu 'yipe yipe yipe' zarya isn't going to work. Well. Personally i have more interesting stuff than sitting on undock for hours and shitting into local chat (you do realise all of your alliances are already in Block list of any reasonable person?). RL stuff, whatever. So you can enjoy it and i will act when you leave And this war is giving me loads of ISK. Thanks for your visit. Just dock and buy my stuff! |

Galadriel Vasquez
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
114
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 15:37:00 -
[213] - Quote
Hi Sec whiners heres an idea - Band together and take yourselves to Null and wrench the Pinatas from the current incumbents.... If this is too much hard work or too complex you wont win EVE. I have tin foil hat trained to 5. |

Lord Zim
990
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 16:12:00 -
[214] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Not really. In theory bombs should be used in groups by 7 at a time. Then attack can destroy BS. Now you launch 1 bomb at a time. 1 bomb can't even blow frigate without MWD... So i'm not sure what is purpose of SBs these days  Only if target will sit there and wait for next SB attack.... and next.... You know what, somehow I'd completely forgotten they'd managed to **** the fix up by forgetting to reapply resists. My bad. vOv |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
843
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 16:23:00 -
[215] - Quote
Gas thread and ban OP. . |

Vellen Thoss
The Scope Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 17:41:00 -
[216] - Quote
forestwho wrote:due your repetable failures
This is not about nerfing tech, this is about injecting sooo much isk in an alliance by broken game mechannics that it is impossible to counter them in several arms races. Resulting in several things:
Unlimited reimbursent power; -Basicly this gives the abillity to suicie fleet after fleet to ware the oppoment isk pool down.
Unlimited capital ship buying power; -Abllity to fully fund allaince super capitals and reimburse them and not getting an financial injury when losing.
Strenghten the individual corporations of a tech alliance more -By having lots of isk for those corps they are able to purchase more and better support for there members. Think hereby about setting up logi chains with corp JF's, hireing FC's and free roaming ship reimbursements.
Giving those alliances a better moral and a better pubic image due more isk -Good FC's tend to join such allaices as they are getting payed in isk and getting their ships fully reimbursed. This creates a chain of affects that boost internal alli moral (more stuff/roams to do) and increases overall public image
Exellent Alliance Recruitment -Those allainces can take in more and better corps due promising them isk every month. Why shouldnt join an allaince that reimburse all your losses freely, hands out free supers and payes you 10-20b a month for just being there...
This is an armsrace that will effects eve for a long long time. Due poor game desighn and repeatable negection of serious issues like this i come to the conclusion that you have learned nothing so far CCP. The only way to fix this a little bit is insta removing tech from tech moons and NPC seed it at current prices untill ringmining is introduced. The excess isk gained should be removed to a level thats acceptable, something thats upto you to decide. The biggest reson for this to do it now is due ISK stocking. When the amount of isk that an allaice gains is soo high that they can save up 500 billion isk a month, something must be serious wrong. When an alliance has over 10 Trillion in savings and gaining another 500 billion a month something is not right.... Expecialy when it is publicly known that CCP employees have high ranks in that allaince. A serious Public Image Threat for you marketing department and your customer base.
Empires rise and fall.
Even in Star Wars, the Empire had all the iskies, had all the death stars and people and millions of laser cannon fodder (TIE Fighters) but a rag tag group with probably less than 2 full fleets managed to take them down.
Just because CFC and TEST are populous and possess numerous assets, does not make them unstoppable.
Changing game mechanics is not the way to go. Let the people sort out their own problems.
Kinda how I raise my kids. For better or worse, this game is a pure sandbox and (ideally) CCP keeps their hand out of the gears as much as possible. |

Ping Pang Pong
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 17:55:00 -
[217] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:March rabbit wrote:
[quote=March rabbit]And when your 300-500+ drake fleet is sitting outside of a station nothing below this numbers can get your out. Before this "fix" there was conter to blobs - SB gangs. Not it is not exists.
SBs aren't nerfed, they're changed back to what they had before CCP ****** with missiles etc, which means you have to actually think a bit before lobbing bombs, instead of essentially doing a 256 man bombing run which is able to put aeons into armor in one volley. .
Isn't it rather strange that CCP steps in and changes bombs directly after CFC gets an entire drake fleet knocked out by an SB run? I mean, bombs have been the way they were for years. Suddenly it is used against the goons and *ring ring* the batphone goes off and CCP gets to work to make sure the CFC isn't hit again by this mechanic that had been in game for years. Sad really.
I wouldn't be surprised if we had the GM's stepping in and nuking SoCo ships for the CFC like they did for the goons during a wardec a while back. 10 minute petition answer, direct out of game communications with CCP devs, opposing forces ships start to go *pop* out of the blue.
Nepotism in its truest form. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8451
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 17:59:00 -
[218] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:Gas thread and ban OP. Why is it always that and not the other way around?  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
27
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 18:00:00 -
[219] - Quote
Galadriel Vasquez wrote:Hi Sec whiners heres an idea - Band together and take yourselves to Null and wrench the Pinatas from the current incumbents.... If this is too much hard work or too complex you wont win EVE.
Careful it's not like CVA would be a hard nut to crack |

baltec1
Bat Country
1616
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 18:05:00 -
[220] - Quote
AlleyKat wrote:Xython wrote:AlleyKat wrote:Only difference is that BoB actually had the respect and the money, instead of just the money.
BoB. Respect? Ow. My sense of irony just sprained itself. It wasn't open to debate; attempting to rewrite history will not erase my memory. It also was not my intention to remind you of painful truths to offend you; sorry if that was the impression you got. AK
Cant say I ever respected BoB. |

baltec1
Bat Country
1616
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 18:07:00 -
[221] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:Galadriel Vasquez wrote:Hi Sec whiners heres an idea - Band together and take yourselves to Null and wrench the Pinatas from the current incumbents.... If this is too much hard work or too complex you wont win EVE. Careful it's not like CVA would be a hard nut to crack
CVA is impossible to kill. We all have tried it and it just keeps on comming back like a bad rash. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1289
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 18:08:00 -
[222] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:words
Thanks for your opinion hisec guy but bombs never worked that way until CCP bugged them in inferno
I'm sure you'd know this since you have so much experience with bombs in hisec
Oh and we've been keeping the bill paid on the SF/Honda wars now that they can't be mutual a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1289
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 18:11:00 -
[223] - Quote
No but please keep thinking Raidendot is or ever was a strong, stable alliance and not a loose alliance of high-SP retired mission runners and ex-BoB bittervets that depended entirely on amassing several of one ridiculously unbalanced shiptype that has been the subject of so many nerfs over the years
I mean surely they were so skilled that they could have avoided losing all of their space by kicking the holding corp that holds most of it right??? Oh wait they did a rogue goon |

Zyress
The Fabulous Thunderbirds
112
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 18:15:00 -
[224] - Quote
So what? They own an enormous empire out in null-sec and can build a never ending supply of ships that can't come to High sec or fit in a wormhole. Its like continuing a game of civ after you control all the land masses or playing a game with cheat codes that give you unlimited resources, eventually it gets old, boring, and pointless to continue. Thats the reason for things like burn jita and hulkaggeddon, its just them trying to break up the boredom of their pointless existence. If you don't have something to strive for in a game, it loses its entertainment value. Eventually they'll grow tired of it and probably move onto another game, or possibly they'll crumble from within when they realize that their only competition is themselves. |

Lord Zim
992
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 18:22:00 -
[225] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:Isn't it rather strange that CCP steps in and changes bombs directly after CFC gets an entire drake fleet knocked out by an SB run? I mean, bombs have been the way they were for years. Suddenly it is used against the goons and *ring ring* the batphone goes off and CCP gets to work to make sure the CFC isn't hit again by this mechanic that had been in game for years. Sad really. You should take a trip to mount tinfoil, I'm sure you can have a sweet chat with jade while you're there.
Someone on our side discovered that bombs were surprisingly effective now, and decided to try a 160 man bombing run on a carrier or two and an aeon. The carriers went pop, the aeon lost all its shields, this was recorded and posted on youtube, and I expect CCP went "oh ****" and fixed it. And by "fixed it" I mean "completely flubbed the fix", but that's CCP for you. Bombs are apparently fixed properly now. (watch me be proven wrong, now).
So you can come down off of mount tinfoil, now.
Ping Pang Pong wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if we had the GM's stepping in and nuking SoCo ships for the CFC like they did for the goons during a wardec a while back. 10 minute petition answer, direct out of game communications with CCP devs, opposing forces ships start to go *pop* out of the blue.
Nepotism in its truest form. I said come down from, not climb even higher up. |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
199
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 18:30:00 -
[226] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:KrakizBad wrote:Tell me more about how SoCo works, oh NPC alt forum warrior. (PS. I'm sorry you would get fined for posting with your main.) Oh did I make the Goon lap dog angry? Know how I know you're angry? When people get angry and have no real argument they like to point out that I am in an NPC corp. Know why you see goons posting on thier mains? Because no one tells us how to play the game we pay for.
We're allowed to post, we're allowed to chat in local, we aren't forced to fly OP's, we aren't told to make our own money so we can afford to fly ops that we're forced to join.
You talk about anger and your post is full of hate and envy because, as a goon, we can afford to have fun how and when we want; while you as a pet are forced to play the game how and when someone else tells you.
Instead of being mad at goons, why don't you tell your slave drivers that they can start paying for your gametime, seeing as they're already controlling it as is.
I would feel bad for you guys, but no one's making you stay in those crappy corps and alliances but yourself.
The only problem with tech is that our enemies are to incompitent to take any. They spend more time telling thier members what they can and can't do, and finding new ways to fine them to make money to actually organize enough to learn how to play EVE.
|

Cpt Roghie
Sabotage Incorporated Executive Outcomes
30
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 18:36:00 -
[227] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:KrakizBad wrote:Tell me more about how SoCo works, oh NPC alt forum warrior. (PS. I'm sorry you would get fined for posting with your main.) Oh did I make the Goon lap dog angry? Know how I know you're angry? When people get angry and have no real argument they like to point out that I am in an NPC corp. Know why you see goons posting on thier mains? Because no one tells us how to play the game we pay for. We're allowed to post, we're allowed to chat in local, we aren't forced to fly OP's, we aren't told to make our own money so we can afford to fly ops that we're forced to join. You talk about anger and your post is full of hate and envy because, as a goon, we can afford to have fun how and when we want; while you as a pet are forced to play the game how and when someone else tells you. Instead of being mad at goons, why don't you tell your slave drivers that they can start paying for your gametime, seeing as they're already controlling it as is. I would feel bad for you guys, but no one's making you stay in those crappy corps and alliances but yourself. The only problem with tech is that our enemies are to incompitent to take any. They spend more time telling thier members what they can and can't do, and finding new ways to fine them to make money to actually organize enough to learn how to play EVE.
Truth, this guy speaks it. Zzzzzzzz.
|

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 19:30:00 -
[228] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:Lord Zim wrote:March rabbit wrote:
[quote=March rabbit]And when your 300-500+ drake fleet is sitting outside of a station nothing below this numbers can get your out. Before this "fix" there was conter to blobs - SB gangs. Not it is not exists.
SBs aren't nerfed, they're changed back to what they had before CCP ****** with missiles etc, which means you have to actually think a bit before lobbing bombs, instead of essentially doing a 256 man bombing run which is able to put aeons into armor in one volley. . Isn't it rather strange that CCP steps in and changes bombs directly after CFC gets an entire drake fleet knocked out by an SB run? I mean, bombs have been the way they were for years. Suddenly it is used against the goons and *ring ring* the batphone goes off and CCP gets to work to make sure the CFC isn't hit again by this mechanic that had been in game for years. Sad really. I wouldn't be surprised if we had the GM's stepping in and nuking SoCo ships for the CFC like they did for the goons during a wardec a while back. 10 minute petition answer, direct out of game communications with CCP devs, opposing forces ships start to go *pop* out of the blue. Nepotism in its truest form. and @ the above poster: It is hard to combat both the CFC and CCP at the same time. It seems that every time someone gets a leg up there are changes that get rolled out which specifically cater to what the goons are up to. A few things CCP has done to directly intervene in the game and support the Goons/CFC: -Titan tracking nerf while CFC raids Raiden -Wardec changes only after goons get dogpiled. They had done a dog pile a few weeks earlier on another alliance, but no one seemed to care until it was the goons on the receiving end. -GM's nuking an opposing corp/alliance's ships during a war with the goons And the most recent: Bomb changes put in place immediately after a CFC drake fleet goes byebye. There are probably countless other times that things like these have happened, but these are ones I can think of off the top of my head. While I am too lazy to find the articles, there are plenty of reputable MMO gaming sites (MMORPG.com, Massively.com etc) that have spoken out and reported on this happening. It still doesn't change the fact that there are quite a few people working in CCP that are or "were" goons or the facts of mechanics being changed out of no where as soon as it benefits the goons.
Posting on my main to say that this man has heavily invested in shares of a tinfoil supplier. |

Jonah Gravenstein
584
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 20:27:00 -
[229] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:
Posting on my main to say that this man has heavily invested in shares of a tinfoil supplier.
Little does he know that the tinfoil hat actually attracts the Martian mind bending rays instead of repelling them, the propaganda is the inverse of the truth in this case  War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Lithalnas
Privateers Privateer Alliance
118
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 20:31:00 -
[230] - Quote
after being here for about 6 years this is what I have to say about threads that accuse some alliance of "owning nulsec"
Every single one has fallen without exception, The largest have fallen to a combination of internal disputes which split the alliance or break up coalitions. It happens every time. Privateer Alliance, rebuilding a not so safe High Sec.-á
Want to assist in this endevor? (contract wars, corp/pilot recrutment) Contact one of our directors. |

Lord Zim
997
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 20:32:00 -
[231] - Quote
Lithalnas wrote:after being here for about 6 years this is what I have to say about threads that accuse some alliance of "owning nulsec"
Every single one has fallen without exception, The largest have fallen to a combination of internal disputes which split the alliance or break up coalitions. It happens every time. No, this time, this time, tech will make sure we don't break apart. |

Freezehunter
201
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 21:06:00 -
[232] - Quote
forestwho wrote:
>a better pubic image due more isk >better pubic image >pubic
I lost my **** on that one. LOL
Inappropriate signature, CCP Phantom. |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
35
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 23:14:00 -
[233] - Quote
Cpt Roghie wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:KrakizBad wrote:Tell me more about how SoCo works, oh NPC alt forum warrior. (PS. I'm sorry you would get fined for posting with your main.) Oh did I make the Goon lap dog angry? Know how I know you're angry? When people get angry and have no real argument they like to point out that I am in an NPC corp. Know why you see goons posting on thier mains? Because no one tells us how to play the game we pay for. We're allowed to post, we're allowed to chat in local, we aren't forced to fly OP's, we aren't told to make our own money so we can afford to fly ops that we're forced to join. You talk about anger and your post is full of hate and envy because, as a goon, we can afford to have fun how and when we want; while you as a pet are forced to play the game how and when someone else tells you. Instead of being mad at goons, why don't you tell your slave drivers that they can start paying for your gametime, seeing as they're already controlling it as is. I would feel bad for you guys, but no one's making you stay in those crappy corps and alliances but yourself. The only problem with tech is that our enemies are to incompitent to take any. They spend more time telling thier members what they can and can't do, and finding new ways to fine them to make money to actually organize enough to learn how to play EVE. Truth, this guy speaks it.
Says the EXE pet. Remember the eye of terror? |

AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
299
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 23:23:00 -
[234] - Quote
Bolow Santosi wrote:AlleyKat wrote:Xython wrote:AlleyKat wrote:Only difference is that BoB actually had the respect and the money, instead of just the money.
BoB. Respect? Ow. My sense of irony just sprained itself. It wasn't open to debate; attempting to rewrite history will not erase my memory. It also was not my intention to remind you of painful truths to offend you; sorry if that was the impression you got. AK Yes because propping yourself up as some quasi feudal lord and deeming nullsec is for the elite only was a good, healthy and respectable mindset.
And accurate. GÇ£You go into combat, and itGÇÖs NOT going to be WagnerGǪindustrial techno or really hard drum and bassGÇ¥ Reynir Hardarson, founding member of CCP Games, 2002.
somethingjustgotreal.com |

Blobber NL
Galactic Express Intrepid Crossing
115
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 23:30:00 -
[235] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1.
You know that won't ever happen... |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
338
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 23:54:00 -
[236] - Quote
Blobber NL wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. You know that won't ever happen...
And whose fault is that? -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Lord Zim
1001
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 23:55:00 -
[237] - Quote
Goons' fault, duh. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
386
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:08:00 -
[238] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Goons' fault, duh. Sorry I didn't bother to read the posts. What crime are you goons confessing to now? Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
172
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:12:00 -
[239] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. Care Bear Swarm ??? |

Garreth Vlox
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:16:00 -
[240] - Quote
So basically you're mad someone else found a better way to play the game then you did? If you want their space TAKE IT, this is EVE stop crying in the forums that someone else has toys that are cooler than yours and start playing the game. |

Apostate Lucius
The Plebian Republic
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:17:00 -
[241] - Quote
Vellen Thoss wrote:
Empires rise and fall.
Even in Star Wars, the Empire had all the iskies, had all the death stars and people and millions of laser cannon fodder (TIE Fighters) but a rag tag group with probably less than 2 full fleets managed to take them down.
Just because CFC and TEST are populous and possess numerous assets, does not make them unstoppable.
Changing game mechanics is not the way to go. Let the people sort out their own problems.
Kinda how I raise my kids. For better or worse, this game is a pure sandbox and (ideally) CCP keeps their hand out of the gears as much as possible.
This isn't Star Wars. The economy of Star Wars never came into play, thus all the satire you see on YouTube concerning building Death Star Mk II. Quite frankly, had the Emperor used GSF tactics, the Rebellion would have been a cloud of discombobulated atoms free floating in space. Star Wars was for entertainment purposes only, not a How-To guide to fighting wars. Anyone who uses it as such...well...let's just say that I would have no pity for them as they got their ticket punched repeatedly.
I agree that GSF should NOT have anything taken from them that they already possess, it is their possessions, they did whatever they did to put it in their hangars and wallets, and ships. If CCP were to go and take the material and Isk made from it, they would be violating the spirit of Eve Online. Anyone who loves the game would fight against such an extreme action, no matter your loyalties or alliegances. Anyone who did not fight to stop something like that from happening would deserve to have it happen to them too.
That being said, I believe that Tech should be removed from the game, with nothing taking its place at all. As tinfoil-y as what the OP says really sounds, there are some valid points being made. The unadulterated amount of money, coupled with the combat doctrine and pure firepower that the GSF possesses would make dislodging them close to impossible on any timetable measured in less than years. It can be done, do not mistake what I am saying. The only expedient route would be an internal strife ending with the total dissolution of GSF and it's satellite corps/alliances. Otherwise, someone is going to have to want what they have more than they do.
I stand on the GSF's side of the line on this though. If CCP tried to take their money and material, that would be a violation of the game and the players. Quite frankly, OP, you should be ashamed to have even suggested that CCP take anything from them, let alone an amount that they might consider reasonable. The only reasonable amount is zero. Let Caesar never forget, though he may rule with the authority of the gods, he is allowed to rule by the whim of the people. |

Hemmo Paskiainen
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
336
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:21:00 -
[242] - Quote
fact is, income leven is the main driver for any corp or alliance. fact is that income driver on the most top level of eve is ****** an horrible disbalanced. im not saying it should be balanced 100% but i have to agree with the OP. this unhealty income situation is going to affect all of us as whole eve is connected in a hugh butterfly affect. add this upcomming devswarm public image and i can say for 100% guarantied that eve will not gain extra active players this year.... and i really wonder why that is... seems to me CCP has proven over and over they dont really care about the game and its growth or are stuck in this imaginairy fantasie game that only exist to shoot red crosses on the overview, anyhow.. bye CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS |

Lord Zim
1002
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:21:00 -
[243] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Goons' fault, duh. Sorry I didn't bother to read the posts. What crime are you goons confessing to now? All of them. |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
117
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:29:00 -
[244] - Quote
lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars
|

Bolow Santosi
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:29:00 -
[245] - Quote
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote:fact is, income level is the main driver for any corp or alliance. fact is that income driver on the most top level of eve is ****** an horrible disbalanced. im not saying it should be balanced 100% but i have to agree with the OP. this unhealty income situation is going to affect all of us as whole eve is connected in a hugh butterfly affect. add this upcomming devswarm public image and i can say for 100% guarantied that eve will not gain extra active players this year.... and i really wonder why that is... seems to me CCP has proven over and over they dont really care about the game and its growth or are stuck in this imaginairy fantasie game that only exist to shoot red crosses on the overview, anyhow.. bye
You know I always wondered what's the renter income like down in the south? It's not insignificant. Maybe not quite as good as tech but it's still good. If only your leaders weren't wasting that income on poorly FC'd T3 fleets or personal super capitals, you quality of life down there might be better.
Just sayin
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
343
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:30:00 -
[246] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars
Not just HS Forum Warriors. -A- Forum warriors too. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
343
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:31:00 -
[247] - Quote
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote: add this upcomming devswarm public image and i can say for 100% guarantied that eve will not gain extra active players this year.... and i really wonder why that is...
Last available numbers, EvE's up more than 10k Subs from December. 361k in May vs 350k in December. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Jonah Gravenstein
588
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 00:48:00 -
[248] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars
I resemble that remark, but I'm firmly on the side of Goons on this one, they took it, they get to keep it, until such time that others can take it from them. Like I said in my earlier post, if people don't like the OTEC thingy then they should get off their collective backsides, find like minded others and actually try and take the tech away from its current controllers, instead they ask CCP to fix something that isn't broken. War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 01:32:00 -
[249] - Quote
Apostate Lucius wrote:Anyone who loves the game would fight against such an extreme action, no matter your loyalties or allegiances.
This right here is the key sticking point. All these people who are demanding a tech nerf because they don't have any pretty much don't love eve.
Meanwhile, the people who do have Tech who have been demanding from the start that Tech needs to be fixed probably love eve and want to see it grow. |

Marconus Orion
Massive PVPness
177
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 01:36:00 -
[250] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud.  |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 01:40:00 -
[251] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud. 
Income really doesn't win a war, dude. It can help, or make things easier, but you can win a war with a minimum of funds if you are smart.
But Goons started in the game with Supercaps and Tech Moons. They certainly didn't start with Rifters and a few friends. |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
117
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 01:49:00 -
[252] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud. 
Tell us more about nullsec warfare, noted nullsec expert marlona sky.
|

Marconus Orion
Massive PVPness
177
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 02:27:00 -
[253] - Quote
Hahaha. Please keep coming with these replies. They are golden! |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
344
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 02:52:00 -
[254] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:Hahaha. Please keep coming with these replies. They are golden!
So are you saying that they're right, or that you can't come up with new lies to try to counter their points? -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Garreth Vlox
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 02:54:00 -
[255] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud. 
I like how you downplay the importance of people actually logging in and getting in fleet and waiting for hours for a fight that never happens, and then log in the next day and do it all over again. Money is meaningless without a fleet to back it up. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 02:57:00 -
[256] - Quote
Garreth Vlox wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud.  I like how you downplay the importance of people actually logging in and getting in fleet and waiting for hours for a fight that never happens, and then log in the next day and do it all over again. Money is meaningless without a fleet to back it up.
It's true., fleets win fights. Isk has almost nothing to do with it. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1163
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 03:45:00 -
[257] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:Garreth Vlox wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud.  I like how you downplay the importance of people actually logging in and getting in fleet and waiting for hours for a fight that never happens, and then log in the next day and do it all over again. Money is meaningless without a fleet to back it up. It's true., fleets win fights. Isk has almost nothing to do with it. But they're breaking our morale, what will our isk for for us then? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
538
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 03:56:00 -
[258] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud. 
When was the last time a sov war was lost because one side had money problems?
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
344
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:05:00 -
[259] - Quote
Mfume Apocal wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud.  When was the last time a sov war was lost because one side had money problems?
Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems? -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1293
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:11:00 -
[260] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Mfume Apocal wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:SetrakDark wrote:lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud.  When was the last time a sov war was lost because one side had money problems? Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems?
No, just an absentee directorate. a rogue goon |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
119
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:13:00 -
[261] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems?
Not having the ISK in the right wallet doesn't exactly qualify as an "income issue" in my mind.
:P
Quite literally I cannot think of one occasion in the three years I have followed nullsec wars where income played a role worth mentioning.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1163
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:17:00 -
[262] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems? No, just an absentee directorate. Never not forget to pay sov bills.  Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
344
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:19:00 -
[263] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems? Not having the ISK in the right wallet doesn't exactly qualify as an "income issue" in my mind. :P Quite literally I cannot think of one occasion in the three years I have followed nullsec wars where income played a role worth mentioning.
Never said income problem, I said "Money Problem" Just happens to be a funny little sidenote showing that Goons are just as bad at the game as they claim. (and another, similar, sidenote where LAWN just has bad luck)
But yeah, I can't think of any occasion where a war was lost because the defense (or offense, for that matter) ran out of money either.
Ran out of will, Ran into someone with more people, Ran out of friends, sure. But never because they Ran out of money. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
119
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:27:00 -
[264] - Quote
Heck, just look at the current war in the South. The supposedly poor techless alliances are throwing away t3 fleets almost daily and losing, while the supposedly wealthy tech alliances are mainly using drakes and winning.
The closest example I can think of was actually in terms of smart resource and logistics use, where WN had an entire backup supercap fleet waiting to go in POS in the drone regions, which was pretty decisive in finally stemming the NC advances in Geminate and turning the tide of the war. That had nothing to do with an income disparity though, and everything to do with the DRF spending their income wisely while the NC pissed it away on stations, JBs, and jammers in every system.
Again, the entire idea is so laughably wrong based on verifiable nullsec warfare history that only someone as clueless as marlona sky would champion it. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1163
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:33:00 -
[265] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:But yeah, I can't think of any occasion where a war was lost because the defense (or offense, for that matter) ran out of money either.
Ran out of will, Ran into someone with more people, Ran out of friends, sure. But never because they Ran out of money. Yeah, it seems attrition war is based on chasing away their pets/renters and grinding their morale down until they don't undock or log in.
Speaking of not undocking though. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Abel Merkabah
TIMELINE Industries
42
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 05:38:00 -
[266] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems? Not having the ISK in the right wallet doesn't exactly qualify as an "income issue" in my mind. :P Quite literally I cannot think of one occasion in the three years I have followed nullsec wars where income played a role worth mentioning.
Doesn't this kind of point to a problem? That the resources of all these alliances are so vast that depletion of your opponents funds is not a viable strategy? Should wars be more destructive? Perhaps the ability to destroy stations and the stock piled contents stored with in.
I'll be honest, no experience with null, but I do intend to move to null when I can (helping RL friends in their corp first), so this is a legitimate question hoping for experienced players' opinions. "The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds, given adequate vacuuming systems." |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
349
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 05:41:00 -
[267] - Quote
Abel Merkabah wrote:SetrakDark wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems? Not having the ISK in the right wallet doesn't exactly qualify as an "income issue" in my mind. :P Quite literally I cannot think of one occasion in the three years I have followed nullsec wars where income played a role worth mentioning. Doesn't this kind of point to a problem? That the resources of all these alliances are so vast that depletion of your opponents funds is not a viable strategy? Should wars be more destructive? Perhaps the ability to destroy stations and the stock piled contents stored with in. I'll be honest, no experience with null, but I do intend to move to null when I can (helping RL friends in their corp first), so this is a legitimate question hoping for experienced players' opinions.
Alliances with High Morale but no money win because their members do have money and are willing to spend it. It doesn't take much for an individual to be able to field Drakes to a Drakefleet. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Abel Merkabah
TIMELINE Industries
42
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 05:53:00 -
[268] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Abel Merkabah wrote:SetrakDark wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems? Not having the ISK in the right wallet doesn't exactly qualify as an "income issue" in my mind. :P Quite literally I cannot think of one occasion in the three years I have followed nullsec wars where income played a role worth mentioning. Doesn't this kind of point to a problem? That the resources of all these alliances are so vast that depletion of your opponents funds is not a viable strategy? Should wars be more destructive? Perhaps the ability to destroy stations and the stock piled contents stored with in. I'll be honest, no experience with null, but I do intend to move to null when I can (helping RL friends in their corp first), so this is a legitimate question hoping for experienced players' opinions. Alliances with High Morale but no money win because their members do have money and are willing to spend it. It doesn't take much for an individual to be able to field Drakes to a Drakefleet.
I can see the truth in that. I suppose if everyone is flying what they can afford to lose, it shouldn't be too hard to cover costs.
Kind of depressing though. In my mind I always pictured nullsec wars having drastic consequences. Although I suppose if your alliance would lose all sov, that would be a fairly drastic consequence. "The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds, given adequate vacuuming systems." |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1163
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:10:00 -
[269] - Quote
Abel Merkabah wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Alliances with High Morale but no money win because their members do have money and are willing to spend it. It doesn't take much for an individual to be able to field Drakes to a Drakefleet. I can see the truth in that. I suppose if everyone is flying what they can afford to lose, it shouldn't be too hard to cover costs. Kind of depressing though. In my mind I always pictured nullsec wars having drastic consequences. Although I suppose if your alliance would lose all sov, that would be a fairly drastic consequence. Morale is the real resource. Clearly having isk sitting somewhere but no pilots is ...
But pilots can get ships if they don't have em. Right now, to replace the reimbursements we get, I think a drake is half an hour of work, and a scorpion is about an hour. A hound is like 15 minutes. A blackbird is a few minutes.
My scorpion went out once in Delve and shot a few cruise missiles at a SBU. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
139
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:15:00 -
[270] - Quote
Abel Merkabah wrote: Doesn't this kind of point to a problem? That the resources of all these alliances are so vast that depletion of your opponents funds is not a viable strategy? Should wars be more destructive? Perhaps the ability to destroy stations and the stock piled contents stored with in.
I'll be honest, no experience with null, but I do intend to move to null when I can (helping RL friends in their corp first), so this is a legitimate question hoping for experienced players' opinions.
Rule one in Eve; Never fly what you can't afford to loose.
Two hours running anomalies/L4s will get you enough money for a well fit drake, a few assault frigates, lots of cruisers, or a huge pile of rifters. There is almost no way to interdict individual income streams, and as stated before, if morale remains high, people will log in and fight with their own money if they are motivated enough. "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
349
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:16:00 -
[271] - Quote
Abel Merkabah wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Abel Merkabah wrote:SetrakDark wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems? Not having the ISK in the right wallet doesn't exactly qualify as an "income issue" in my mind. :P Quite literally I cannot think of one occasion in the three years I have followed nullsec wars where income played a role worth mentioning. Doesn't this kind of point to a problem? That the resources of all these alliances are so vast that depletion of your opponents funds is not a viable strategy? Should wars be more destructive? Perhaps the ability to destroy stations and the stock piled contents stored with in. I'll be honest, no experience with null, but I do intend to move to null when I can (helping RL friends in their corp first), so this is a legitimate question hoping for experienced players' opinions. Alliances with High Morale but no money win because their members do have money and are willing to spend it. It doesn't take much for an individual to be able to field Drakes to a Drakefleet. I can see the truth in that. I suppose if everyone is flying what they can afford to lose, it shouldn't be too hard to cover costs. Kind of depressing though. In my mind I always pictured nullsec wars having drastic consequences. Although I suppose if your alliance would lose all sov, that would be a fairly drastic consequence.
A good Super fleet whelp does tend to do a number on most Alliance's wallets. I remember RA had to suspend their reimbursement program for a month or so after they lost something like 9 Titans in one fight.
That played merry havoc on morale even with the promise that reimbursements were simply delayed, not canceled. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1163
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:19:00 -
[272] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:A good Super fleet whelp does tend to do a number on most Alliance's wallets. I remember RA had to suspend their reimbursement program for a month or so after they lost something like 9 Titans in one fight.
That played merry havoc on morale even with the promise that reimbursements were simply delayed, not canceled. Oooh...
So we need to bait and hotdrop some supers eh. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
349
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:24:00 -
[273] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:A good Super fleet whelp does tend to do a number on most Alliance's wallets. I remember RA had to suspend their reimbursement program for a month or so after they lost something like 9 Titans in one fight.
That played merry havoc on morale even with the promise that reimbursements were simply delayed, not canceled. Oooh... So we need to bait and hotdrop some supers eh.
This was back when they were in Detorid. Who knows the current state of their finances. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
139
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:28:00 -
[274] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:A good Super fleet whelp does tend to do a number on most Alliance's wallets. I remember RA had to suspend their reimbursement program for a month or so after they lost something like 9 Titans in one fight.
That played merry havoc on morale even with the promise that reimbursements were simply delayed, not canceled. Oooh... So we need to bait and hotdrop some supers eh. Death to all supercaps? Or is it, death to all supercaps, but Goons?
"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1163
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:30:00 -
[275] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:A good Super fleet whelp does tend to do a number on most Alliance's wallets. I remember RA had to suspend their reimbursement program for a month or so after they lost something like 9 Titans in one fight.
That played merry havoc on morale even with the promise that reimbursements were simply delayed, not canceled. Oooh... So we need to bait and hotdrop some supers eh. Death to all supercaps? Or is it, death to all supercaps, but Goons? I thought people were saying supercaps were the way to defeat goons? You shouldn't be supporting death to all supercaps. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

DarkAegix
Acetech Systems
1149
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:32:00 -
[276] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Giving those alliances a better moral and a better pubic image due more isk -Good FC's tend to join such allaices as they are getting payed in isk and getting their ships fully reimbursed. This creates a
Quote:Giving those alliances a better moral and a better pubic image due more isk
 |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1163
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:36:00 -
[277] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:forestwho wrote:Giving those alliances a better moral and a better pubic image due more isk -Good FC's tend to join such allaices as they are getting payed in isk and getting their ships fully reimbursed. This creates a Quote:Giving those alliances a better moral and a better pubic image due more isk  Our isk definitely helps our public image.
Haha. No. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Lord Zim
1004
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:38:00 -
[278] - Quote
They don't. They do give our pubes a mean trim though. |

Abel Merkabah
TIMELINE Industries
42
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 06:47:00 -
[279] - Quote
Thanks for the replies to my questions and correcting my misconceptions. I appreciate the valid responses. "The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds, given adequate vacuuming systems." |

MotherMoon
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
948
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 08:02:00 -
[280] - Quote
Only question i have is why cant a stage an attack on undefended moons to raid them of goo. Does it magically transport the huge distance between moon and pos? If small gangs could blow up the ships transporting the goo to the safe pos, gangs of 5-10 players could make an impact raiding supply lines.
Small defense fleets would form to catch them.
Small gang warfare could come back to null sec.
Also if your an allaince with so many systems that 70% of them are empty most of the time, you deserve to have your passive income stolen by brave pilots. It would promote smaller sov space. Come on its perfect ! Why dust 514 is on Console and not PCBattle field 3 sales Xbox 360: 2.2 million PlayStation 3: 1.5 million PC: 500,000http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg |

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
61
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 08:05:00 -
[281] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: Morale is the real resource. Clearly having isk sitting somewhere but no pilots is ...
But pilots can get ships if they don't have em. Right now, to replace the reimbursements we get, I think a drake is half an hour of work, and a scorpion is about an hour. A hound is like 15 minutes. A blackbird is a few minutes.
My scorpion went out once in Delve and shot a few cruise missiles at a SBU.
And this is the real advantage of reimbursement programs - it keeps the morale of your pilots up when they lose ships. We had a newbro lose his first ever drake a few days ago, on one of the few time SoCo decided to fight. Normally, that loss would have hurt, and set him back quite a bit. Given that this was his first major coalition fleet, he probably would have retreated and refused to take part while he made the isk back. But the combination of insurance and reimbursement meant he was sitting in a new drake within a few minutes, waiting to join the next fleet going out "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

Victoria Sin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
99
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 09:09:00 -
[282] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:Victoria Sin wrote:I just think the tech should move around. I don't like the idea of fixed assets at fixed locations at all. Tech needs to fade out of one region and fade into another over time. Then you'll see a more dynamic null-sec. This is what happens when npc corp alts of high sec carebears suggest changes to null sec mechanics.
Please come to the discussion with an argument, rather than a simple minded ad hominem. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1294
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 09:10:00 -
[283] - Quote
tech needs to be nerfed but rotation is a stupid idea a rogue goon |

Jonah Gravenstein
597
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 09:15:00 -
[284] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:tech needs to be nerfed but rotation is a stupid idea
Unless it's the OP doing the rotating, whilst having an uncomfortable encounter with a Sansha spiky bit.
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Lord Zim
1005
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 09:16:00 -
[285] - Quote
Victoria Sin wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote:Victoria Sin wrote:I just think the tech should move around. I don't like the idea of fixed assets at fixed locations at all. Tech needs to fade out of one region and fade into another over time. Then you'll see a more dynamic null-sec. This is what happens when npc corp alts of high sec carebears suggest changes to null sec mechanics. Please come to the discussion with an argument, rather than a simple minded ad hominem. Have you scanned a region even once, or even a constellation even once?
Have you even been to nullsec? |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1163
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 09:21:00 -
[286] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote: Morale is the real resource. Clearly having isk sitting somewhere but no pilots is ...
But pilots can get ships if they don't have em. Right now, to replace the reimbursements we get, I think a drake is half an hour of work, and a scorpion is about an hour. A hound is like 15 minutes. A blackbird is a few minutes.
My scorpion went out once in Delve and shot a few cruise missiles at a SBU.
And this is the real advantage of reimbursement programs - it keeps the morale of your pilots up when they lose ships. We had a newbro lose his first ever drake a few days ago, on one of the few time SoCo decided to fight. Normally, that loss would have hurt, and set him back quite a bit. Given that this was his first major coalition fleet, he probably would have retreated and refused to take part while he made the isk back. But the combination of insurance and reimbursement meant he was sitting in a new drake within a few minutes, waiting to join the next fleet going out Hm, I didn't know TASHA called them newbros. :shobon:
But definitely newbies need to be fed lots of Rifters, Blackbirds, Drakes and so on. Once they get rolling on isk generation, it's not hard to stay in ships. But that hump, like EVE's famous learning curve, is a problem if you're going at it without help.
All cute newbies X up please :)
I want to add that the comms leaks from SoCo are great for morale. Also, TEST's 10mil for T1 frigs that got on Makalu's killmail by webbing him, great idea. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Merovee
Gorthaur Legion Of Mordor
24
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 09:28:00 -
[287] - Quote
Napoleon was defeated when the allies finally started to fight his way. Same thing with CFC, Someone has to organize the same way as the Goons to defeat the Goons, CCP must keep their noses out of it and not screw it up like they did to BoB and the GBC. |

Lord Zim
1005
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 09:31:00 -
[288] - Quote
Merovee wrote:Napoleon was defeated when the allies finally started to fight his way. Same thing with CFC, Someone has to organize the same way as the Goons to defeat the Goons, CCP must keep their noses out of it and not screw it up like they did to BoB and the GBC.  How did CCP screw it up like they did to BoB? By giving BoB T2 BPOs? |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 10:10:00 -
[289] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:Heck, just look at the current war in the South. The supposedly poor techless alliances are throwing away t3 fleets almost daily and losing, while the supposedly wealthy tech alliances are mainly using drakes and winning.
Because after 9 months of tech farming, whitch resulted in exelent recruitment, logi ect (see my first post) the numbers are too big to counter. You can only counter a 1200 man drake blob with a 1300 drake blob....
Abel Merkabah wrote:
Doesn't this kind of point to a problem? That the resources of all these alliances are so vast that depletion of your opponents funds is not a viable strategy? Should wars be more destructive? Perhaps the ability to destroy stations and the stock piled contents stored with in.
I'll be honest, no experience with null, but I do intend to move to null when I can (helping RL friends in their corp first), so this is a legitimate question hoping for experienced players' opinions.
For instance, super warefare isnt possible due the tech advantage, if SoCo loses a massive super fight their resources would be depleted. For what they need to counter, what ever they would, could will bring in super numbers will be serious damaged. CFC has over 150 titans and 200 supercarriers easy on standby.
Mortimer Civeri wrote: Rule one in Eve; Never fly what you can't afford to lose.
Two hours running anomalies/L4s(40-60 mill/hr) will get you enough money for a well fit drake, a few assault frigates, lots of cruisers, or a huge pile of rifters, with no alliance reimbursement. There is almost no way to interdict individual income streams, and as stated before, if morale remains high, people will log in and fight with their own money if they are motivated enough.
This doesnt work in fleet fights, you can bring a rifter or a rupture to a drake fleet but your contribution to the whole in general is less than if you would bring a drake. Certainly when fighing not equal numbers. It is dualbe to fight equal shiptypes when 1-1.5 -2 outnumberd but that aint possbile when its 1-3 or more. In those cases you need to deploy better ships to counter, like soco does with tengu's and lokies. And this is where the income level does matter.
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Our isk definitely helps our public image.
Haha. No.
Yes it does
Merovee wrote:Napoleon was defeated when the allies finally started to fight his way. Same thing with CFC, Someone has to organize the same way as the Goons to defeat the Goons, CCP must keep their noses out of it and not screw it up like they did to BoB and the GBC. 
So someone has to organize something, wow thats sooo smart of you.... Do you also perhaps know what this something maybe could be? As accourding to above posters it must not cost alot as one side having alot of isk shouldn't matter... right?
|

dexington
Lysergic.acid.diethylamide
32
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 10:12:00 -
[290] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Merovee wrote:Napoleon was defeated when the allies finally started to fight his way. Same thing with CFC, Someone has to organize the same way as the Goons to defeat the Goons, CCP must keep their noses out of it and not screw it up like they did to BoB and the GBC.  How did CCP screw it up like they did to BoB? By giving BoB T2 BPOs?
Was it CCP or an CCP employee who gave away the BPO's?, where is a big difference. |

Lord Zim
1005
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 10:25:00 -
[291] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Because after 9 months of tech farming, whitch resulted in exelent recruitment, logi ect (see my first post) the numbers are too big to counter. You can only counter a 1200 man drake blob with a 1300 drake blob....[/quote] Tech has nothing to do with "excellent recruitment, logi etc", we had this well before we had tech. But have fun with that strawman.
As for "the numbers are too big to counter", bullshit. There are literally tons of ways to counter the numbers, the problem is that their FCs are ****.
And "you can only counter a 1200 man drake blob with a 1300 man drake blob", ***** please. Get out of here with your whining if you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
forestwho wrote:For instance, super warefare isnt possible due the tech advantage, if SoCo loses a massive super fight their resources would be depleted. For what they need to counter, what ever they would, could will bring in super numbers will be serious damaged. CFC has over 150 titans and 200 supercarriers easy on standby. SoCo has more or less the same capabilities as we do, the problem isn't numbers, it's morale and the fact their FCs are ****. And again, the problem with supers isn't the cost of them, but the time it takes to build them.
And on a higher plane, the problem with supers is the fact they even exist, or exist with a direct combat role. Titans and supers wouldn't have anything to do with combat in any way, shape or form, if I had anything to do with their design.
forestwho wrote:This doesnt work in fleet fights, you can bring a rifter or a rupture to a drake fleet but your contribution to the whole in general is less than if you would bring a drake. Certainly when fighing not equal numbers. It is dualbe to fight equal shiptypes when 1-1.5 -2 outnumberd but that aint possbile when its 1-3 or more. In those cases you need to deploy better ships to counter, like soco does with tengu's and lokies. And this is where the income level does matter. For their price, tengus and lokis are **** compared to a vast array of other ships.
I guess the reason the entirety of eve hates us is because we're poors, then. Oh wait, they love us because we're rich, yet they ***** and whine and call us a plague upon the eve community because we're rich. Oh wait, but that makes us popular oh god what is this logic
forestwho wrote:So someone has to organize something, wow thats sooo smart of you.... Do you also perhaps know what this something maybe could be? As accourding to above posters it must not cost alot as one side having alot of isk shouldn't matter... right? It has been shown time and time again that money doesn't decide wars, lack of morale, **** fleet composition, **** FCs and **** logistics do.
Suck less at this and you'll get a lot farther than just throwing money at a problem. But I expect that you'll just ignore this and blather on with your inane ramblings. |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
238
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 10:59:00 -
[292] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote: It has been shown time and time again that money doesn't decide wars, lack of morale, **** fleet composition, **** FCs and **** logistics do.
income (and distribution of income) effects morale, fleet compositions, FCs and logistics.
Try to enforce a fleet composition if you can't afford subcap ship replacements (and don't want to go the "leet pvp corp" way of just kicking everyone who refuses to train for the right ship), try to find good FCs that are willing to lead the resulting ragtag fleets, try to keep morale up in the face of your killboard being flooded by red entries and your pilots' wallets taking one hit after another, ...
Logistics, too, requires you to have some wealthy alliance members who can afford to invest the necessary capital. Being able to put up ships for half your fleet on alliance contracts is not terribly useful.
The ability to offer your members ship replacement (at the very least for expensive/high risk ships like dictors and logis) and the ability to field a reasonable capital fleet (i.e. not three player-owned dreads that they can't afford to replace) are in my experience absolutely crucial and very much dependent on income.
I have been in a "social" 0.0 alliance which had literally no income outside of corp taxes and the overall experience can only be summed up as one huge exercise in frustration.
(yes, "friends" are maybe more important than income but making friends can be hard if you have next to nothing to offer) |

Jonah Gravenstein
598
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 10:59:00 -
[293] - Quote
forestwho wrote: Lots of stuff that makes no sense
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 10:59:00 -
[294] - Quote
Bolow Santosi wrote:
You know I have always wondered what's the renter income like down in the south? It's not insignificant. Maybe not quite as good as tech but it's still good. If only your leaders weren't wasting that income on poorly FC'd T3 fleets or personal super capitals, your quality of life down there might be better.
Just sayin
Rent income is not that big once substracted the sov & upgrade costs. Only the good true sec systems are good isk but there are only a handfull in the southrn regions. Brings me back to how good true sec systems Deklein has....(http://imageshack.us/f/600/dekleintruesec.jpg/) Just too many, best region ingame. Before saying it was always that... thats true... but the anomaly system got formed around it.... depending on true sec... Did the mittani propose that in the CSM? Or was it backdoor politic's? Funny the sov cost increase fits perfecly in such situation of goonswarm. 3 techmoons are equal to 1 region income in south.
Pipa Porto wrote:Hemmo Paskiainen wrote: add this upcomming devswarm public image and i can say for 100% guarantied that eve will not gain extra active players this year.... and i really wonder why that is... Last available numbers, EvE's up more than 10k Subs from December. 361k in May vs 350k in December.
So eve Gained 11k subscribers in 5 months, thats like 3,14% growth in 5 months or 0,628% a month... I wonder why that is... For me personal, im not buying a subscription... im buying an experiance. The game is what i experiance thats what i expect to get when paying my subscription. What if it repeatable fails to deliver. If expectations are always artificialy kept high by the fancy trailers and EVETV manipulation commercials about how coool eve is while infact its only 1/10 of that. Its dissapointment after dissapointment. My reson to still log on and play it is free plex and i do not which to lose what i build up in 7 years of playing eve. I have "friends" / people i like to chat too ect. Login resoning is for everyone different but that is what keeping me ingame. What if due repatable "unfairness" / "Disbalancements" and simple "Fail to understand Customer Needs" those friends and people stop playing or loggin in one by one. Than eventualy its like a cardhouse that collapses and more people around me would quit. That is the biggest threath to eve and ccp simply fails to understand this. The social aspect is what keeps 0.0 driving. And its slowly rotting due above resons. The old 0.0 are the experiance players with the knowlage, the corp makers, relation builders and the people that bind people cause the're funny or cool or just nice to talk to and play eve with. A fresly new sub value doesnt weight as much as an old vet. In the buttlefly social hierachy affect maxtrix (if ccp would be smart and make one about their customers) they would notice that 1 old vet that logs in daily brings in more social value than a fresh eve player than may or may not to hop back to battlefield 3 or whatever game when a new one comes out. Simply because he isnt that attached to eve as the old vet. Its upto CCP to what kind of player they which to satisfy and give them attention, the new ones or or old loyal ones... People are not blind, the sheeps are getting herded by the clever ones that see what is happening. In social games like these are general believes spreading like the flue. The overall public image is just being affected by incompetence or however the "tech issue"is interpertated. |

Lord Zim
1007
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 11:11:00 -
[295] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:income (and distribution of income) effects morale, fleet compositions, FCs and logistics. And I'm telling you, point blank, that this has not had any impact on major wars the last 3 years.
Vera Algaert wrote:Try to enforce a fleet composition if you can't afford subcap ship replacements (and don't want to go the "leet pvp corp" way of just kicking everyone who refuses to train for the right ship), try to find good FCs that are willing to lead the resulting ragtag fleets, try to keep morale up in the face of your killboard being flooded by red entries and your pilots' wallets taking one hit after another, ...
Logistics, too, requires you to have some wealthy alliance members who can afford to invest the necessary capital. Being able to put up ships for half your fleet on alliance contracts is not terribly useful.
The ability to offer your members ship replacement (at the very least for expensive/high risk ships like dictors and logis) and the ability to field a reasonable capital fleet (i.e. not three player-owned dreads that they can't afford to replace) are in my experience absolutely crucial and very much dependent on income. You're talking about alliances who end up as renters. I'm talking about actual wars, where people have actually gone to war against eachother. There's not a single war I've been in where money has been even remotely the reason the other side broke, the main reason has always been that we've been much, much more tenacious than the other side.
And before you whine about how we've been sucking at the technetium teat, I'm going so far back as before goons lost Delve/Querious/etc, i.e. before we had any technetium at all, and I'm especially thinking back to when we took fountain and branch. In Fountain, IT Alliance (arguably the biggest alliance in the game at the time, with various hangers-ons) broke because of infighting. In branch, raidendot, also a filthy rich alliance, broke after a month or two of constant harassment. They just plain burnt out.
Not money. Morale.
forestwho wrote:Rent income is not that big once substracted the sov & upgrade costs. Oh re-he-heeeeally?
forestwho wrote:Only the good true sec systems are good isk but there are only a handfull in the southrn regions. Brings me back to how good true sec systems Deklein has....( http://imageshack.us/f/600/dekleintruesec.jpg/) Just too many, best region ingame. Before saying it was always that... thats true... but the anomaly system got formed around it.... depending on true sec... Did the mittani propose that in the CSM? Or was it backdoor politic's? Funny the sov cost increase fits perfecly in such situation of goonswarm. 3 techmoons are equal to 1 region income in south. Hi Jade. Fancy finding you on Mount Tinfoil again. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 11:20:00 -
[296] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Vera Algaert wrote:income (and distribution of income) effects morale, fleet compositions, FCs and logistics. And I'm telling you, point blank, that this has not had any impact on major wars the last 3 years. . Isk is an indirect cause of it, however you put it, eve is a wealth game, its connected to everyting, ether direct or indirect...
Lord Zim wrote:Vera Algaert wrote:Try to enforce a fleet composition if you can't afford subcap ship replacements (and don't want to go the "leet pvp corp" way of just kicking everyone who refuses to train for the right ship), try to find good FCs that are willing to lead the resulting ragtag fleets, try to keep morale up in the face of your killboard being flooded by red entries and your pilots' wallets taking one hit after another, ...
Logistics, too, requires you to have some wealthy alliance members who can afford to invest the necessary capital. Being able to put up ships for half your fleet on alliance contracts is not terribly useful.
The ability to offer your members ship replacement (at the very least for expensive/high risk ships like dictors and logis) and the ability to field a reasonable capital fleet (i.e. not three player-owned dreads that they can't afford to replace) are in my experience absolutely crucial and very much dependent on income. You're talking about alliances who end up as renters. I'm talking about actual wars, where people have actually gone to war against eachother. There's not a single war I've been in where money has been even remotely the reason the other side broke, the main reason has always been that we've been much, much more tenacious than the other side. And before you whine about how we've been sucking at the technetium teat, I'm going so far back as before goons lost Delve/Querious/etc, i.e. before we had any technetium at all, and I'm especially thinking back to when we took fountain and branch. In Fountain, IT Alliance (arguably the biggest alliance in the game at the time, with various hangers-ons) broke because of infighting. In branch, raidendot, also a filthy rich alliance, broke after a month or two of constant harassment. They just plain burnt out..
Not money. Morale..[/quote]
As above, Isk is an indirect cause of it, however you put it, eve is a wealth game, its connected to everyting, ether direct or indirect... |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 11:20:00 -
[297] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Rent income is not that big once substracted the sov & upgrade costs. Oh re-he-heeeeally?
Yes- No - Yes - No, we can go on forever, YES its not that much, how do i know? cause i rent some of it out.... now pls stfu if you havent something to add that isnt a troll post.... thank you....
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Only the good true sec systems are good isk but there are only a handfull in the southrn regions. Brings me back to how good true sec systems Deklein has....( http://imageshack.us/f/600/dekleintruesec.jpg/) Just too many, best region ingame. Before saying it was always that... thats true... but the anomaly system got formed around it.... depending on true sec... Did the mittani propose that in the CSM? Or was it backdoor politic's? Funny the sov cost increase fits perfecly in such situation of goonswarm. 3 techmoons are equal to 1 region income in south. Hi Jade. Fancy finding you on Mount Tinfoil again.
Im not Jade, stop trolling my threat pls with useless comments or i report them and get the removed |

Lord Zim
1007
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 11:31:00 -
[298] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Isk is an indirect cause of it, however you put it, eve is a wealth game, its connected to everyting, ether direct or indirect... If you're in kindergarten and trying to play with the big boys, then yes, you'll be outclassed through wealth, but if you're not ******** and not taking on people who you have no business taking on (i.e. if you're actually taking on people roughly your own strength), then finances only play a part if you're absolute **** at it.
forestwho wrote:Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Rent income is not that big once substracted the sov & upgrade costs. Oh re-he-heeeeally? Yes- No - Yes - No, we can go on forever, YES its not that much, how do i know? cause i rent some of it out.... now pls stfu if you havent something to add that isnt a troll post.... thank you.... Funny how I've heard of minor players who boast of 100b/month in renter income, and that their monthly costs to keep said renters happy were well below this. I guess you've just either got unrealistic dreams of how much you should make while renting, or you're just bad at it.
forestwho wrote:Im not Jade, stop trolling my threat pls with useless comments or i report them and get the removed It's not trolling. Your comment about how mittani "proposed the anomaly system be made around truesec" while in the CSM, or "backdoor politics" is not only fit for conspiracy theorists who live up on Mount Tinfoil, it's slanderous and fallacious to boot. If you knew anything about how things have gone down the last 2 years, you would've known that everyone except CCP opposed the anom change. |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
119
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:11:00 -
[299] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:income (and distribution of income) effects morale, fleet compositions, FCs and logistics.
Just stop and think for a minute.
Your entire argument here is that you need "income" to fight a war. No ******* ****, idiot.
We're talking about income disparity deciding the contest, which is the basis for the suggestion that tech holding alliances cannot be beat strictly because they have tech.
Sure, four jerkoffs living in an NPC station can't beat Goonswarm, but it won't be because they can't afford an SRP program, it will be because they're just four jerkoffs. Yes that disparity exists, but it doesn't even come into play because far more relevant factors will decide the outcome first. On the other hand, when those other factors are more balanced, income will also naturally be balanced enough that it won't be an issue.
Again, people really need to stop talking about topics in which they are so painfully uninformed. It's a really bad habit and near-criminally obnoxious. |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
119
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:24:00 -
[300] - Quote
Abel Merkabah wrote:Doesn't this kind of point to a problem? That the resources of all these alliances are so vast that depletion of your opponents funds is not a viable strategy? Should wars be more destructive? Perhaps the ability to destroy stations and the stock piled contents stored with in.
I'll be honest, no experience with null, but I do intend to move to null when I can (helping RL friends in their corp first), so this is a legitimate question hoping for experienced players' opinions.
I think "problem" is a strong word to use. Undesirable, suboptimal, disappointing? Absolutely, those are all valid. Using the word "problem", though, suggests that it interferes with the smooth running or enjoyment of nullsec warfare, and it really doesn't.
In CCP's defense, getting income, risk/reward balancing, and all that stuff right is an incredibly ambitious endeavor, one which they may never get right. In addition, the fundamental reason is that the pressures that would eventually come to bear on income disparity will break you by morale long before they get to the point where income becomes a factor.
So on the surface your perception is correct, and nullsec warfare will improve as you improve the distribution and strategic nature of income, but the game is still perfectly playable as is.
Good question. Thanks for asking for elaboration instead of just spewing uninformed tinfoil nonsense like some other people. |

Lord Zim
1009
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:30:00 -
[301] - Quote
The problem is that people's morale break so ridiculously early that nobody have even any chance of even seeing the bottom of their alliance's warchest. Cloud Ring/Fountain? 2-3 weeks, total. Branch? A few more weeks. War against soco? They more or less lost it 2 days after the declaration of war, when they said "retreat to NPC stain!".
I keep hoping for a war where it will actually take all the resources the alliance/coalition has, and I've been completely disappointed the last two years. And it has nothing to do with in-game resources. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Nuh-uh. It's all about morale. |

Gallinae
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:39:00 -
[302] - Quote
the funny thing about taking a tech moon...its yet another thing you cant do in eve w/out undocking. |

Ping Pang Pong
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:43:00 -
[303] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:The problem is that people's morale break so ridiculously early that nobody have even any chance of even seeing the bottom of their alliance's warchest. Cloud Ring/Fountain? 2-3 weeks, total. Branch? A few more weeks. War against soco? They more or less lost it 2 days after the declaration of war, when they said "retreat to NPC stain!".
I keep hoping for a war where it will actually take all the resources the alliance/coalition has, and I've been completely disappointed the last two years. And it has nothing to do with in-game resources. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Nuh-uh. It's all about morale.
"It's all about morale."
Which you have effectively bought with **** poor distribution of map resources by CCP. Being able to replace entire fleets of super caps, baring their availability on the market, is a HUGE morale booster. Call in your pets with their super caps and say "if you get popped you have another one waiting for you". What do you think that person is going to do? Sit around in their super cap in a bubble or go get one of the few uses they can out of it because it will automatically be replaced? For most alliances a super cap is a huge investment and losing one is a devastating blow. To the CFC with their moon goo riches it is like dropping a dollar on the floor.
The logic you guys use to try to defend your positions is honestly one of the most ridiculous things I have witnessed in some time. I swear the goon posters must get paid by your alliance to troll the forums with utter stupidity.
|

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1130
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:44:00 -
[304] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. and 50% of that 10% would be in mining barges My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
119
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:44:00 -
[305] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:The problem is that people's morale break so ridiculously early that nobody have even any chance of even seeing the bottom of their alliance's warchest.
Precisely.
Now, does this mean that, in general, warchests are too big? Income too easy? Wars not destructive enough?
Those are all valid questions, and could be subjects worth looking at to improve the quality of nullsec warfare. However, as it stands we are all equally faced with the strategic nature of income in nullsec, and crying about income disparity in the conduct of warfare betrays an undeniable misunderstanding of the nature of nullsec warfare.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8474
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:51:00 -
[306] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:Being able to replace entire fleets of super caps, baring their availability on the market, is a HUGE morale booster. GǪexcept that super caps aren't really available on the market, and that their replacement costs time far more than ISK GÇö a currency that no amount of favourable geography will let you mass-produce. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
119
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:52:00 -
[307] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:Being able to replace entire fleets of super caps, baring their availability on the market, is a HUGE morale booster.
It's awesome when people betray their own argument in the first couple of lines.
Both the SoCo and the CFC could wipe out the market for available supers long before they wiped out their income to replace said supers. Any preparation done to have supers available beforehand to replace losses is tied to logistics and planning, not any income disparity.
Furthermore, one side will almost always have a clear supercap superiority, which means they will get to use the supers while the other side's will stay logged off. Nobody is going to throw away a supercap fleet just because they can replace it. The side with the bigger fleet will use it, while the side with the smaller fleet won't, income disparity on either side being a non-factor.
So, again, income has no mentionable role to play because other more important factors (morale, numbers, logistics, preparation, ect) will always trump one side before income becomes an issue.
P.S. Owned.
|

Lord Zim
1009
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 12:54:00 -
[308] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:Which you have effectively bought with **** poor distribution of map resources by CCP. Being able to replace entire fleets of super caps, baring their availability on the market, is a HUGE morale booster. Call in your pets with their super caps and say "if you get popped you have another one waiting for you". What do you think that person is going to do? Sit around in their super cap in a bubble or go get one of the few uses they can out of it because it will automatically be replaced? For most alliances a super cap is a huge investment and losing one is a devastating blow. To the CFC with their moon goo riches it is like dropping a dollar on the floor. This is bullshit from start to finish. We can't replace supercaps any quicker than some chucklefuck from the south, it still takes just as much time. And, I'll have you know, we generally don't tie down a few trillions in supercaps "just in case". They're all built to order.
Ping Pang Pong wrote:The logic you guys use to try to defend your positions is honestly one of the most ridiculous things I have witnessed in some time. I swear the goon posters must get paid by your alliance to troll the forums with utter stupidity. You're so filled with rage you can't even see sense when it's hitting you in the face.
SetrakDark wrote:Lord Zim wrote:The problem is that people's morale break so ridiculously early that nobody have even any chance of even seeing the bottom of their alliance's warchest. Precisely. Now, does this mean that, in general, warchests are too big? Income too easy? Wars not destructive enough? Those are all valid questions, and could be subjects worth looking at to improve the quality of nullsec warfare. However, as it stands we are all equally faced with the strategic nature of income in nullsec, and crying about income disparity in the conduct of warfare betrays an undeniable misunderstanding of the nature of nullsec warfare. The answer to those questions are "no", "no" and "no". Income can be argued is too high, but it's a non-factor so I'm going with no there as well. If, however, wars had lasted more than just a few meager weeks at best the last 2 years, then that answer would probably go over to yes, however, it depends on how much it actually impacted the actual war vs how much the other side could scrounge up.
The cause for the short wars is probably in part because of supercaps, in part because of the sov system, and in part because people are just pussies now. Supercaps because they're so powerful they're necessary, so expensive and hard to replace time-wise their losses hurt etc, which means that if they're in danger of being lost, people log them off and stay logged off, and they lose the war. SOV because it heavily favours defenders, which means if you've lost 2 systems in a row in 2 weeks, chances are slim you'll manage to stop them from taking the rest of them, which means most wars just end in structure shoots for the remaining 2-4 weeks. |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
119
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:03:00 -
[309] - Quote
I should mention that I, like many people here, am all for a tech nerf. I think tech creates poor strategic incentives, as in the causes for war. However, I am absolutely confident based on verifiable experience that once started, income plays little to no mentionable role in nullsec warfare.
This discussion has nothing to do with protecting tech and everything to do with correcting the impressions disseminated by the painfully uninformed and likely mentally-unstable forum warriors of the GD sub-forum. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1298
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:15:00 -
[310] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Ping Pang Pong wrote:Which you have effectively bought with **** poor distribution of map resources by CCP. Being able to replace entire fleets of super caps, baring their availability on the market, is a HUGE morale booster. Call in your pets with their super caps and say "if you get popped you have another one waiting for you". What do you think that person is going to do? Sit around in their super cap in a bubble or go get one of the few uses they can out of it because it will automatically be replaced? For most alliances a super cap is a huge investment and losing one is a devastating blow. To the CFC with their moon goo riches it is like dropping a dollar on the floor. This is bullshit from start to finish. We can't replace supercaps any quicker than some chucklefuck from the south, it still takes just as much time to build. And, I'll have you know, we generally don't tie down a few trillions in supercaps "just in case". They're all built to order.
To add to this, even alliances that normally buy their supercaps off of the open market (i.e. PL) can't simply buy up a whole pile of them at once - it'd take months to recover from a major supercap welp. You'd have to spend months buying them so as to not get gouged on prices. a rogue goon |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:21:00 -
[311] - Quote
I could multi quote past 10 forum post but i wont. To hook into the super thing... CFC has ALLLOOOT supers, ether bought by tech isk or built from tech isk (relative free isk, no personal isk ect). Corporate super accounts are made with lots of supers. The purchage or builds happend in past 9 months. Combined with increased recruitment benifits due above resoning (buttefly affect). They have simply much better odds ect. I do not pick any side in this whole thread but i dont see SoCo building any supers anytime (and they hvnt put in built due logic resoning) soon due number advantages in all Area's of CFC caused by the neglection of CCP to fix this whole tech issue when it was still fixable. Its obvius were long past that point. You can twist it whatever you like EVE = ISK and it always is relatable to that. Ether direct or indirect.
And no, they are easy to be bought when the price is right. On eve-o forum there are atleast 4-6 for sale each week. Over 2000 moms have been made. They are not all on inactive accounts. |

Lord Zim
1009
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:27:00 -
[312] - Quote
forestwho wrote:To hook into the super thing... CFC has ALLLOOOT supers So does the southern coalition.
forestwho wrote:The purchage or builds happend in past 9 months. Supers have been built in increasing numbers ever since they were buffed. That's a lot longer than "9 months".
forestwho wrote:Combined with increased recruitment benifits due above resoning (buttefly affect). Huh?
forestwho wrote:I do not pick any side in this whole thread but i dont see SoCo building any supers anytime (and they hvnt put in built due logic resoning) soon due number advantages in all Area's of CFC caused by the neglection of CCP to fix this whole tech issue when it was still fixable. "I'm not picking sides, but LOOK HOW POOR SOCO IS BECAUSE GOONS HAVE TECH!!!"
Again, SoCo have just as many supers as we have.
forestwho wrote:Its obvius were long past that point. You can twist it whatever you like EVE = ISK and it always is relatable to that. Ether direct or indirect. ISK isn't what made soco decide they didn't want to go head to head against a super fleet roughly the same size as theirs, a complete lack of balls and the fact that supers can't be easily replaced, is. |

Jonah Gravenstein
598
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:33:00 -
[313] - Quote
TIL Goonswarm = Devswarm, because they control the tech and have as many supers as their competitors
:tinfoil: War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:38:00 -
[314] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:To hook into the super thing... CFC has ALLLOOOT supers So does the southern coalition. Supers have been built in increasing numbers ever since they were buffed. That's a lot longer than "9 months". forestwho wrote:Combined with increased recruitment benifits due above resoning (buttefly affect). Huh? forestwho wrote:I do not pick any side in this whole thread but i dont see SoCo building any supers anytime (and they hvnt put in built due logic resoning) soon due number advantages in all Area's of CFC caused by the neglection of CCP to fix this whole tech issue when it was still fixable. "I'm not picking sides, but LOOK HOW POOR SOCO IS BECAUSE GOONS HAVE TECH!!!" Again, SoCo have just as many supers as we have. forestwho wrote:Its obvius were long past that point. You can twist it whatever you like EVE = ISK and it always is relatable to that. Ether direct or indirect. ISK isn't what made soco decide they didn't want to go head to head against a super fleet roughly the same size as theirs, a complete lack of balls and the fact that supers can't be easily replaced, is.
Are you mad? you sound lill agitated... and keep repeating yourselve... your arnt damage controlling are you? |

Lord Zim
1013
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:49:00 -
[315] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Are you mad? you sound lill agitated... and keep repeating yourselve... your arnt damage controlling are you? Heh, you've been raging up the wall, and you're actually trying a "umad" move? Cute.
As for repeating myself, if you're going to insist on repeating the same fallacy time and time again, you should expect to receive the same smackdown time and time again, too.
Now, how about we go about telling CCP to nerf tech and remove combat roles from supers, eh? I would be all for that. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:49:00 -
[316] - Quote
I will try again to make it clear for you:
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:To hook into the super thing... CFC has ALLLOOOT supers So does the southern coalition. Your supers are kinda free as the tech income is redicules high, so if you lose them there is nothing to be worried about, cant rly say that about soco. This also protects your super builders from any danger so you can build more and more and more for aslong as there is tech or the need to have more...
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Combined with increased recruitment benifits due above resoning (buttefly affect). Huh? You can buy more supercap fc, more corps into allaicne to pilot supers ect or just sub caps. ect,... see hiring PL and or shadoo to FC your fleets...
|

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:49:00 -
[317] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:I do not pick any side in this whole thread but i dont see SoCo building any supers anytime (and they hvnt put in built due logic resoning) soon due number advantages in all Area's of CFC caused by the neglection of CCP to fix this whole tech issue when it was still fixable. "I'm not picking sides, but LOOK HOW POOR SOCO IS BECAUSE GOONS HAVE TECH!!!" Pls stop trolling its useless, everyone sees trough it and lols at you
Lord Zim wrote: Again, SoCo have just as many supers as we have.
Nope, current CFC coalition has more that are also very easy (free) to replace
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Its obvius were long past that point. You can twist it whatever you like EVE = ISK and it always is relatable to that. Ether direct or indirect. ISK isn't what made soco decide they didn't want to go head to head against a super fleet roughly the same size as theirs, a complete lack of balls and the fact that supers can't be easily replaced, is. I believe its well known by now that they are getting out blobbed 4-1 everytime they undock by the complete OTECH, why is that? maybe because of the tech or the devided income that it genarates for all participants? |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:50:00 -
[318] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:
Now, how about we go about telling CCP to nerf tech and remove combat roles from supers, eh? I would be all for that.
Totaly agree with you on this  |

Lady Katherine Devonshire
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
10
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:50:00 -
[319] - Quote
Make moons work more like PI? That is, the moon as a whole stays constant but actual deposits move around and people would have to adjust their harvesters manually every X number of cycles - with shorter cycles paying out more as a reward for diligence? That would mean actually adding harvesters et al like PI has, but hey, it's more realistic than having a space station magically suck rocks out of the crust from a L5 point in orbit.
Just throwing that out there, I really have no idea if that would be better or not. Would still be interesting either way.
If the mythical Dust/EvE crossover ever actually happens, maybe then people could launch ground attacks on PI and MI facilities. Again, may be cool, may suck, but would definitely be interesting.
As for the whole issue of what regions get what... well, that happens everywhere with everything else, so why not moon-goo too? Even novice Empire space miners know that they're going to find different rocks in Gallente space than they will in Caldari space, and that there is a market for people willing to ship stuff between the haves and have-nots. Why should null-sec be any easier?
Because, of course, there is a catch: If an Empire space miner/trader wants to move things from Point A to Point B, all they need is to have neutral or better standings with both the respective NPC Empires. In null-sec, however, "Not blue? KOS" + 23/7 gatecamps makes things a bit more complicated for the would-be neutral freighter captain, because in null-sec there is no such thing as a neutral freighter captain. Thus resources do not get distributed with the same fluidity that they do in Empire space.
My conclusion, then, is that what looks like the problem is in fact only a symptom. The problem is in distribution after moon-mining, not before. If the Minmatar want some rock or blueprint or whatever that is only found in Amarr space, well cold-war be damned, they can just send a neutral alt over there to pick it up for them. Trying to get moon-goo from the space of a rival player alliance, however, requires a lot more effort (and risk) than simply raising your Diplomacy skill another point. Add that to the fact that some people hoard ("Can't risk putting it on the market, lest it falls into the hands of the enemy!) and you get the classic DeBeers situation of artificial scarcity further making things difficult.
Solution? I don't know. Maybe Chribba should start his own transport & freight company. Someone that no one is going to shoot at & thus be able to move some of that moon-goo around and get things flowing again. |

Lord Zim
1013
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:56:00 -
[320] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Your supers are kinda free as the tech income is redicules high, so if you lose them there is nothing to be worried about, cant rly say that about soco. This also protects your super builders from any danger so you can build more and more and more for aslong as there is tech or the need to have more... soco built up their supers during the same timeframe we did, they're also constrained by exactly the same thing we are, i.e. build times.
Lord Zim wrote:You can buy more supercap fc, more corps into allaicne to pilot supers ect or just sub caps. ect,... see hiring PL and or shadoo to FC your fleets... Pretty certain -A- made PL want to teabag their faces for free because they're terrible.
forestwho wrote:Pls stop trolling its useless, everyone sees trough it and lols at you Repeating a fallacy multiple times does not a truism make.
forestwho wrote:Nope, current CFC coalition has more that are also very easy (free) to replace We have more supers who are active. -A- is ****, so they've all logged off and stayed offline.
forestwho wrote:I believe its well known by now that they are getting out blobbed 4-1 everytime they undock by the complete OTECH, why is that? maybe because of the tech or the devided income that it genarates for all participants? The reason they're "getting outblobbed 4-1 every time they undock" is because makalu 'yipe yipe yipe my ass is on fire why are there friendly ecm drones on me aaaaaa' zarya whines so deliciously, and everyone wants to get in on that tear fountain.
Also, they outblobbed PL+Test with 800 or so, then we came down and said that we weren't even going to be there for good fights. You know what happened then? Their fleets shrunk to the pathetic size they're at now. If -A- hadn't been ****, they could've at the very least made this war take much, much longer. Instead, they gave up 2 days after mittani said "we're heading south to burn their space to the ground". |

Ben Youssef Noban
Sons of the Prophet
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:02:00 -
[321] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Your supers are kinda free as the tech income is redicules high, so if you lose them there is nothing to be worried about, cant rly say that about soco. This also protects your super builders from any danger so you can build more and more and more for aslong as there is tech or the need to have more... soco built up their supers during the same timeframe we did, they're also constrained by exactly the same thing we are, i.e. build times. Lord Zim wrote:You can buy more supercap fc, more corps into allaicne to pilot supers ect or just sub caps. ect,... see hiring PL and or shadoo to FC your fleets... Pretty certain -A- made PL want to teabag their faces for free because they're terrible. forestwho wrote:Pls stop trolling its useless, everyone sees trough it and lols at you Repeating a fallacy multiple times does not a truism make. [quote=forestwho]Nope, current CFC coalition has more that are also very easy (free) to replace We have more supers who are active. -A- is ****, so they've all logged off and stayed offline.
Only thing anyone has heard from you in this thread is that the Goons and CFC are winning because they are better than everyone else. Only reason you are better is you have infinitely more isk, many times the numbers and good relations with the game developers. If CFC side was poor and outnumbered you'd be crying for the winning enemies ships to be downgraded or the game mechanics to be changed in your favor again.
|

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:05:00 -
[322] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote: Also, they outblobbed PL+Test with 800 or so, then we came down and said that we weren't even going to be there for good fights. You know what happened then? Their fleets shrunk to the pathetic size they're at now. If -A- hadn't been ****, they could've at the very least made this war take much, much longer. Instead, they gave up 2 days after mittani said "we're heading south to burn their space to the ground".
Not all true, dont forget SoCo is mostly Europe / russia TZ, the activity dropped before they staged to C3N, most ppl are on holliday break or enjoying the good weather (only +20 degrees C for 6-7 weeks a yr). Where in US most people concider the holiday as time off & spend it to play eve (good weather is almost always present). The cultural differances of experiancing summer does matter alot.
Like all wars / engangements, they dont happen in summer, they happen after summer just when winter kicks in... |

Lord Zim
1013
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:08:00 -
[323] - Quote
Ben Youssef Noban wrote:Only reason you are better is you have infinitely more isk Wrong, isk does not an effective war machine make.
Ben Youssef Noban wrote:many times the numbers Wrong, soco and hbc are more or less equal in number.
Ben Youssef Noban wrote:and good relations with the game developers. We do?
Ben Youssef Noban wrote:If CFC side was poor and outnumbered you'd be crying for the winning enemies ships to be downgraded or the game mechanics to be changed in your favor again. We used to be poor and outnumbered. We still won wars.
forestwho wrote:Not all true, dont forget SoCo is mostly Europe / russia TZ, the activity dropped before they staged to C3N, most ppl are on holliday break or enjoying the good weather. Where in US most people concider the holiday as time off & spend it to play eve (good weather is almost always present). The cultural differances of experiancing summer does matter alot.
Like all wars / engangements, they dont happen in summer, they happen after summer just when winter kicks in... So it's just summer in the southern coalition, but winter in the CFC? |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:13:00 -
[324] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Ben Youssef Noban wrote:Only reason you are better is you have infinitely more isk Wrong, isk does not an effective war machine make. Im srry i have to agree with him, i agree with that PL issue, but atleast cfc have the isk to buy it if they woudnt have it (im not saying they do or do not, just saying they have the ability to buy it if its needed)
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote: Like all wars / engangements, they dont happen in summer, they happen after summer just when winter kicks in...
So it's just summer in the southern coalition, but winter in the CFC? Yes, when the kiddies go back to school and need to make homework again instead of playing eve 24/7 in momsbasement  |

Ben Youssef Noban
Sons of the Prophet
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:14:00 -
[325] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Ben Youssef Noban wrote:Only reason you are better is you have infinitely more isk Wrong, isk does not an effective war machine make. Ben Youssef Noban wrote:many times the numbers Wrong, soco and hbc are more or less equal in number. Ben Youssef Noban wrote:and good relations with the game developers. We do? [quote=Ben Youssef Noban]If CFC side was poor and outnumbered you'd be crying for the winning enemies ships to be downgraded or the game mechanics to be changed in your favor again. We used to be poor and outnumbered. We still won wars.
Why you quoted like this is very confusing to read. You tell so many things not truth but confused in quotes.
|

Akai Kvaesir
0ffice of Naval Intelligence
94
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:35:00 -
[326] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  The only problem when trying to defeat an opponent that not only has access to unlimited funding, but also has a monopoly on ships and tech...Do I need to spell out the self-reinforcing aspect? If it were a winnable war, or one that even had a possibility of winning (however slight), there would be thousands marching to end the Goontide. Alas, you have probably ruined a lot of peoples games, and those you haven't are too space-poor to do ANYTHING about it. |

March rabbit
R.I.P. Legion Red Alliance
212
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:38:00 -
[327] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:The problem is that people's morale break so ridiculously early that nobody have even any chance of even seeing the bottom of their alliance's warchest. Cloud Ring/Fountain? 2-3 weeks, total. Branch? A few more weeks. War against soco? They more or less lost it 2 days after the declaration of war, when they said "retreat to NPC stain!".
I keep hoping for a war where it will actually take all the resources the alliance/coalition has, and I've been completely disappointed the last two years. And it has nothing to do with in-game resources. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Nuh-uh. It's all about morale. completely agree about morale. Low morale -> low resistance, easy win.
However how do you want to get "full-scale war" when you just stomp on your opponents? Which resistance from SoCo you want when you completely overwhelm us? Not one in right mind would hope to win this war so we just having fun of pvp right-on-door.
You will take all those regions? Ok. We will roam there. It was really boring in Droneland when i needed to make 15-20 jumps just to see 1 neutral face. So now it is just nice to have so many easy targets from TEST, goons, other pets right on undock 
And again: you will not have any good war in Eve these days when every attack only starts with 99% chance of win. Every war will be just one-sided destruction. |

March rabbit
R.I.P. Legion Red Alliance
212
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:48:00 -
[328] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:To hook into the super thing... CFC has ALLLOOOT supers So does the southern coalition. Again, SoCo have just as many supers as we have. numbers please.
and about northern coalition: i think everyone seen screenshot of PL titan fleet when they visited LXQ some time ago?  |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1314
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 22:07:00 -
[329] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Mittens himselve said to me he wanted to rush delve because of the standard low activity in summers. This is kinda an eve fact. Attacking is harder than defending in current sov system, therefor blitzkrieg strategie without gudfights when your opponment is weak and outnumbered...... Hes a exellent strategist i must admit 
Yeah I'm sure that The Mittani tells you everything a rogue goon |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 22:21:00 -
[330] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Im srry i have to agree with him, i agree with that PL issue, but atleast cfc have the isk to buy it if they woudnt have it (im not saying they do or do not, just saying they have the ability to buy it if its needed) I can either buy myself one pimpfit nyx on the market, or I can build myself two pimpfit nyxes (and spend 2 months doing so). The open market only has so much capacity, and you will get gauged if you do so.
Money is not the problem, build capacity is.
forestwho wrote:Yes, when the kiddies go back to school and need to make homework again instead of playing eve 24/7 in momsbasement  And the CFC etc aren't afflicted by exactly the same problem, right?
forestwho wrote:Mittens himselve said to me he wanted to rush delve because of the standard low activity in summers. This is kinda an eve fact. Attacking is harder than defending in current sov system, therefor blitzkrieg strategie without gudfights when your opponment is weak and outnumbered...... Hes a exellent strategist i must admit  So you're trying to tell us that you're close to mittens? :allears:
March rabbit wrote:numbers please. and about northern coalition: i think everyone seen screenshot of PL titan fleet when they visited LXQ some time ago?  According to Grath of PL, AAA has 283 supercarriers and titans on file, of which 159 have had activity the past 3 months. Raiden. had 265 supercaps on file, of which half had seen action the past 3 months.
SOCO have also thrown away tengu and loki fleets like there's no tomorrow, they could've bought tons of supercaps with the money sunk into those. They're not hurting for isk. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1173
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 00:21:00 -
[331] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:completely agree about morale. Low morale -> low resistance, easy win. However how do you want to get "full-scale war" when you just stomp on your opponents? Which resistance from SoCo you want when you completely overwhelm us? Not one in right mind would hope to win this war so we just having fun of pvp right-on-door. You will take all those regions? Ok. We will roam there. It was really boring in Droneland when i needed to make 15-20 jumps just to see 1 neutral face. So now it is just nice to have so many easy targets from TEST, goons, other pets right on undock  And again: you will not have any good war in Eve these days when every attack only starts with 99% chance of win. Every war will be just one-sided destruction. At least you're not bitter or deluded about what is happening. Good for you  Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

InternetSpaceship
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
136
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 01:09:00 -
[332] - Quote
I can just picture the OP, banging away at the keyboard in his impotent rage like a frustrated gorilla, spelling and grammar be damned. Official Recruiter for GoonSwarm Corporation.
If you paid isk to get into GoonSwarm, you were probably scammed.-á If you had the foresight to save the name of your scammer, let me know and I'll do what I can to help you. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 01:31:00 -
[333] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:forestwho wrote:Mittens himselve said to me he wanted to rush delve because of the standard low activity in summers. This is kinda an eve fact. Attacking is harder than defending in current sov system, therefor blitzkrieg strategie without gudfights when your opponment is weak and outnumbered...... Hes a exellent strategist i must admit  Yeah I'm sure that The Mittani tells you everything
Whispering sweet nothings in his ear. |

Doctor Benway Kado
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
173
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 04:03:00 -
[334] - Quote
Nerf tech, death to all supers, unfuck sov. Unleash the thousand year rule of the GoonSwarm Hegemony upon all of nullsec, none shall escape the all-encompassing grasp of the CFC, bow before our might.
Everything you argued for, we have argued for first. Everything you want, we want more. Everything you think would hurt us, would only ensure our continued success as a coherent coalition. So why do we post, calling you a moron? Because most of the time, the ideas are terrible (rotating moons, removing local, nerfing jump freighters, whatever the flavor of the month is). But more importantly, it's because some people have fun being forum warriors. That's why people go off message, and don't get any **** for it. That's why we'll call for a tech nerf in one thread, and defend tech in another. Get it yet?
We're allowed to chat in local, post on the Eveo forums (lol -A-), say whatever the **** we want - because some of us find it fun. You get it yet? That's why we're winning. Because it's not about sov, or owning all of nullsec, or being the next BoB. It's about fun. Remember that? Fun? It's the secret to our success and how we keep winning eve. Everything we do, everything we fight for, is geared towards creating the most amount of fun for our members. That's why we have multiple full fleets of drakes playing station games with the only SoCo FC and his hundred or so pilots. We're having fun, and they're not. |

Kuehnelt
Devoid Privateering
124
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 04:10:00 -
[335] - Quote
Doctor Benway Kado wrote:It's about fun. Remember that? Fun? It's the secret to our success and how we keep winning eve. Everything we do, everything we fight for, is geared towards creating the most amount of fun for our members.
... wait for it...
Doctor Benway Kado wrote:That's why we have multiple full fleets of drakes playing station games with the only SoCo FC and his hundred or so pilots. |

Doctor Benway Kado
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
173
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 05:29:00 -
[336] - Quote
Aaaaaaaand you still don't get it. Why am I still surprised with you, Eveo forums, after all this time. |

baltec1
Bat Country
1627
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 05:55:00 -
[337] - Quote
Akai Kvaesir wrote: The only problem when trying to defeat an opponent that not only has access to unlimited funding, but also has a monopoly on ships and tech...Do I need to spell out the self-reinforcing aspect? If it were a winnable war, or one that even had a possibility of winning (however slight), there would be thousands marching to end the Goontide. Alas, you have probably ruined a lot of peoples games, and those you haven't are too space-poor to do ANYTHING about it.
I bet you said the exact same thing about NC (BFF), BoB and the DRF. I have helped to kill so many superpowers in my time that I know for a fact that at some point our empire will fall. |

Kuehnelt
Devoid Privateering
124
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 06:23:00 -
[338] - Quote
Doctor Benway Kado wrote:Aaaaaaaand you still don't get it.
No, I think I do get it. For you, "fun" is just a propaganda word. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 06:29:00 -
[339] - Quote
Kuehnelt wrote:Doctor Benway Kado wrote:It's about fun. Remember that? Fun? It's the secret to our success and how we keep winning eve. Everything we do, everything we fight for, is geared towards creating the most amount of fun for our members. ... wait for it... Doctor Benway Kado wrote:That's why we have multiple full fleets of drakes playing station games with the only SoCo FC and his hundred or so pilots. Yep.
I think I need another dose of SoCo comms leaks.
Those are SO good, when they're all gone, I don't know what I'll do ... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

baltec1
Bat Country
1627
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 06:36:00 -
[340] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: Yep.
I think I need another dose of SoCo comms leaks.
Those are SO good, when they're all gone, I don't know what I'll do ...
We will always have IRC kitchen sink fleets.  |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 06:49:00 -
[341] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote: Yep.
I think I need another dose of SoCo comms leaks.
Those are SO good, when they're all gone, I don't know what I'll do ...
We will always have IRC kitchen sink fleets.  Well, yes we do, but those don't have the concentrated awesomeness of the SoCo comm leaks. We never got IRC leaks when blobbing them. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
123
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 06:54:00 -
[342] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. Don't say we. You are no Goon, you are a lowly pet. There was no we, Goons fought for it and took it. Your masters just threw you a bone as condolences for all the rug burns on your knees. Also Goons give themselves more credit than they deserve. They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. Goons would of never been able to beat BOB in a normal war, and they know that too. If they thought for even a second they could win they wouldn't have destroyed BOB in one fell swoop with no shots fired. Why take away your biggest target if you think you can beat them? Because they knew they had zero chance.
Cool story bro. Tell us more. |

Halete
Echoes of Korgoth Initiative
260
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:01:00 -
[343] - Quote
What if... Wait for it.
RvB controlled a monopoly on Null-sec?
On-topic: Who gives a ****, really? A group of players controlling the majority of assets/tech/whatever flavor argument people are using these days is entirely down to them taking it. That's EVE. If you don't like it, change it.
Asking a developer to 'nerf' a GROUP OF PLAYERS is the most pathetic thing I've heard in 15 years of video-games. Dirty heretical mud-child, reporting in. // Throwing one's hands up in the air and crying 'cal-matar nonsense!' seems to be the new dismissive these days when someone is being neither relevant nor dignified. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
362
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:09:00 -
[344] - Quote
Halete wrote:What if... Wait for it.
RvB controlled a monopoly on Null-sec?
On-topic: Who gives a ****, really? A group of players controlling the majority of assets/tech/whatever flavor argument people are using these days is entirely down to them taking it. That's EVE. If you don't like it, change it.
Asking a developer to 'nerf' a GROUP OF PLAYERS is the most pathetic thing I've heard in 15 years of video-games.
Nerf RvB!
They're... doing something... eh, @%#$ it. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

baltec1
Bat Country
1627
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:17:00 -
[345] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: Well, yes we do, but those don't have the concentrated awesomeness of the SoCo comm leaks. We never got IRC leaks when blobbing them.
Well...you dont tend to see them, me on the other hand |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:23:00 -
[346] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. Don't say we. You are no Goon, you are a lowly pet. There was no we, Goons fought for it and took it. Your masters just threw you a bone as condolences for all the rug burns on your knees. Also Goons give themselves more credit than they deserve. They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. Goons would of never been able to beat BOB in a normal war, and they know that too. If they thought for even a second they could win they wouldn't have destroyed BOB in one fell swoop with no shots fired. Why take away your biggest target if you think you can beat them? Because they knew they had zero chance. Cool story bro. Tell us more. I think he's mad, bro. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
362
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:24:00 -
[347] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Rene Fullchest wrote:Well, you know, it's not like CCP just gave all the tech to the CFC. We fought for it, took it, and hold it.
Not our problem that we were good enough to do so, nor is it CCP's.
If you truly feel that you, no one, will ever be able to take enough to compete, you should probably unsubscribe, because we certainly are not going to stop defending it. Don't say we. You are no Goon, you are a lowly pet. There was no we, Goons fought for it and took it. Your masters just threw you a bone as condolences for all the rug burns on your knees. Also Goons give themselves more credit than they deserve. They were greatly inferior to BOB and couldn't beat them. That's why they had to basically cheat (even if not violating EULA) by, infiltrating the corp and disassembling from the inside. Goons would of never been able to beat BOB in a normal war, and they know that too. If they thought for even a second they could win they wouldn't have destroyed BOB in one fell swoop with no shots fired. Why take away your biggest target if you think you can beat them? Because they knew they had zero chance. Cool story bro. Tell us more. I think he's mad, bro.
I bro he's bro, bra -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

tiberiusric
Comply Or Die En Garde
15
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:30:00 -
[348] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork: 
Stop talking out of your ass.... what a stupid quote... when goons have 9000 players, have been established alot longer, make trillions of isk per month. Then what shall the OP go and suddenly recruit 9000 good players out of thin air? and offer them nothing as he has nothing?
You sir are stupid, and i dont usually post, but comments like this annoy the hell outta me.
Even the strong NC., Evoke, PL cant even do it and they are some of the best pvp alliances in eve, how do you expect some random to do it... seriously think about what you say before posting total and utter rubbish.
To the OP, I think alot of people totally agree with you, but CCP continues to do sweet FA, the game has become saturated and people are starting to get a little f*cked off now. But again CCP and Goons seem to be controlling the game. Goons win EVE |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
873
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:31:00 -
[349] - Quote
Akai Kvaesir wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  The only problem when trying to defeat an opponent that not only has access to unlimited funding, but also has a monopoly on ships and tech...Do I need to spell out the self-reinforcing aspect? If it were a winnable war, or one that even had a possibility of winning (however slight), there would be thousands marching to end the Goontide. Alas, you have probably ruined a lot of peoples games, and those you haven't are too space-poor to do ANYTHING about it.
That is a ridiculous statement, you have just answered your own frightened question, if enough people come to fight, surely you stand a chance? Are you so afraid of losing pixels in a video game? That is why you will lose and lose and lose, because you are afraid so of losing. Fortune favours the bold. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
362
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:44:00 -
[350] - Quote
tiberiusric wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Stop talking out of your ass.... what a stupid quote... when goons have 9000 players, have been established alot longer, make trillions of isk per month. Then what shall the OP go and suddenly recruit 9000 good players out of thin air? and offer them nothing as he has nothing? You sir are stupid, and i dont usually post, but comments like this annoy the hell outta me. Even the strong NC., Evoke, PL cant even do it and they are some of the best pvp alliances in eve, how do you expect some random to do it... seriously think about what you say before posting total and utter rubbish. To the OP, I think alot of people totally agree with you, but CCP continues to do sweet FA, the game has become saturated and people are starting to get a little f*cked off now. But again CCP and Goons seem to be controlling the game. Goons win EVE
There are a lot more people who aren't in the GSF than that are. Assuming every GSF member has 2 accounts and only one character in Goonswarm, 18k accounts are owned by GSF members.
There are 361k active accounts.
That means Goonswarm represents, at the upper limit, 5% of the playerbase (and those are kind of ridiculous assumptions).
Now, another good number is the last QEN snapshot of Character location, which puts 86k Characters in Null. That means that Goonswarm represents about 10% of the Nullsec population.
So you've got 90% of the Nullsec population, and 95+% of the general population to recruit from.
So, I guess my question is: What's your next excuse? -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
163
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:51:00 -
[351] - Quote
I would really love to see how many accounts the average low sec player holds.
There are people out here with TWENTY accounts, I'm starting to feel restricted with just two. I'd damn near bet the average nullbear has three.....on the low end. |

Doctor Benway Kado
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
173
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:52:00 -
[352] - Quote
Kuehnelt wrote:Doctor Benway Kado wrote:Aaaaaaaand you still don't get it. No, I think I do get it. For you, "fun" is just a propaganda word. Huh. Actually, maybe you do get it. Our enemies think the idea of having fun is just a propaganda campaign.
Really does kind of sum up everything, doesn't it. |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
201
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:54:00 -
[353] - Quote
Don't understand why anyone would keep playing a game that makes them so angry and bitter.
OP is upset that he was told that he would have to earn his own ISK to buy his own ships, and that the ops were mandatory attendance if you're logged in. They don't care if you're an industrialist, if you're logged in you're required to fit a ship, fleet up, and st in station; even if it's a badger.
SoCo won't reimburse most of their losses anymore. Now there are a bunch of mad SoCo members who think its unfair for other groups to be able to do what his leadership is to incompetent to do themselves; hence they want tech nerves now because they just found out that the alliance is running out of money.
How ****** is it to log into a game you pay for and have some douchebag tell you that you HAVE to farm ISK when there isn't any fighting to pay for your own ships that you REQUIRED to fly because they threaten you with bans and fines if you're logged in and not in fleet when they tell you.
Why the **** do you guys put up with that bullshit? Instead of being mad at us how about you start taking matters into your own hands by removing the douchebags that are ruining the game for you by telling you how and when to play. You guys might actually be able to get somewhere if you stopped letting those pompous dickheads running your game time.
Jesus Christ, grow some balls and put together a better alliance, headed by people who aren't egomaniacal twats who think they're you ******* boss in a video game.
I don't know whats worse, the guys in charge or you sad sacks who stick with them.
The only problem with tech is that you guys are letting your alliances be run by a group of inept wanna be dictators, to incompetent to take it from us. You are the problem, not us.
Get smart or keep being miserable. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
362
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 07:56:00 -
[354] - Quote
Onictus wrote:I would really love to see how many accounts the average low sec player holds.
There are people out here with TWENTY accounts, I'm starting to feel restricted with just two. I'd damn near bet the average nullbear has three.....on the low end.
I don't see any reason to believe that GSF has a higher (or lower) prevalence of multiple accounts than any other nullsec alliance, so the percentages hold. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
163
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 08:00:00 -
[355] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Don't understand why anyone would keep playing a game that makes them so angry and bitter.
OP is upset that he was told that he would have to earn his own ISK to buy his own ships, and that the ops were mandatory attendance if you're logged in. They don't care if you're an industrialist, if you're logged in you're required to fit a ship, fleet up, and sit in station; even if it's a badger.
SoCo won't reimburse most of their losses anymore. Now there are a bunch of mad SoCo members who think its unfair for other groups to be able to do what his leadership is to incompetent to do themselves; hence they want tech nerfs now because they just found out that the alliance is running out of money.
How ****** is it to log into a game you pay for and have some douchebag tell you that you HAVE to farm ISK when there isn't any fighting to pay for your own ships that you're REQUIRED to fly because they threaten you with bans and fines if you're logged in and not in fleet when they tell you.
Why the **** do you guys put up with that bullshit? Instead of being mad at us how about you start taking matters into your own hands by removing the douchebags that are ruining the game for you by telling you how and when to play. You guys might actually be able to get somewhere if you stopped letting those pompous dickheads run your game time.
Jesus Christ, grow some balls and put together a better alliance, headed by people who aren't egomaniacal twats who think they're you ******* boss in a video game.
I don't know whats worse, the guys in charge or you sad sacks who stick with them.
The only problem with tech is that you guys are letting your alliances be run by a group of inept wanna be dictators, to incompetent to take it from us. You are the problem, not us.
Get smart or keep being miserable.
Y U mad?
It was a good splerge largely bullshit, but nice.
Our reimbursement hasn't changed this year, and we don't have industrialists, AAAC is that way, and they generally don' t run ops |

Caitlyn Tufy
Refuge of Hope Lemniskate
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 08:53:00 -
[356] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1.
Numbers aren't everything, something that gets painfully obvious when you throw a coalition of mission runners and miners at an experienced pirate group, then have to work with people who don't know how to align their ships, much less actually execute complex strategies. Don't get me wrong, given time, high sec players can learn, just as our alignment friend learned, but it's not something you can achieve over night.
As for wrestling out your own spot in the world - everything is possible and nobody is undefeatable. If anything, oldschool Goons with their cheap frigate tactics back in the day can serve as a perfect example of what a focused, determined bunch of players can do. But if one expects to have it easy, one should stay in high sec. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 08:59:00 -
[357] - Quote
Doctor Benway Kado wrote:Kuehnelt wrote:Doctor Benway Kado wrote:Aaaaaaaand you still don't get it. No, I think I do get it. For you, "fun" is just a propaganda word. Huh. Actually, maybe you do get it. Our enemies think the idea of having fun is just a propaganda campaign. Really does kind of sum up everything, doesn't it. They'll never understand why people voluntarily click the Join Fleet button when there's undocks to camp and structures to shoot.
It's because our structure shooting FCs have the BEST stories. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
62
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:00:00 -
[358] - Quote
Caitlyn Tufy wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:If only 10% of high sec dwellers were to form an alliance, they would likely out number even the largest null sec alliance by 7 to 1. Numbers aren't everything, something that gets painfully obvious when you throw a coalition of mission runners and miners at an experienced pirate group, then have to work with people who don't know how to align their ships, much less actually execute complex strategies. Don't get me wrong, given time, high sec players can learn, just as our alignment friend learned, but it's not something you can achieve over night. As for wrestling out your own spot in the world - everything is possible and nobody is undefeatable. If anything, oldschool Goons with their cheap frigate tactics back in the day can serve as a perfect example of what a focused, determined bunch of players can do. But if one expects to have it easy, one should stay in high sec. With a half decent FC and a ten minute fleet ops 101 lesson, yes you can take mission runners (with lots of juicy sp) and miners (these guys are useless) and kill leet pvp players, I've seen it done with total noobs all the time. "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:01:00 -
[359] - Quote
People would be amazed how little it would take, sometimes, if only they tried. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:01:00 -
[360] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:[quote=tiberiusric]There are a lot more people who aren't in the GSF than that are. Assuming every GSF member has 2 accounts and only one character in Goonswarm, 18k accounts are owned by GSF members.
There are 361k active accounts.
That means Goonswarm represents, at the upper limit, 5% of the playerbase (and those are kind of ridiculous assumptions).
Now, another good number is the last QEN snapshot of Character location, which puts 86k Characters in Null. That means that Goonswarm represents about 10% of the Nullsec population.
So you've got 90% of the Nullsec population, and 95+% of the general population to recruit from.
So, I guess my question is: What's your next excuse? ....
Probably, looking at the topic, they'd try to imply that tech is the problem. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:03:00 -
[361] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:Caitlyn Tufy wrote:As for wrestling out your own spot in the world - everything is possible and nobody is undefeatable. If anything, oldschool Goons with their cheap frigate tactics back in the day can serve as a perfect example of what a focused, determined bunch of players can do. But if one expects to have it easy, one should stay in high sec. With a half decent FC and a ten minute fleet ops 101 lesson, yes you can take mission runners (with lots of juicy sp) and miners (these guys are useless) and kill leet pvp players, I've seen it done with total noobs all the time. Considering the newbies in the fleets, I think you'd be ok with rifters. The problem is updating your clone will cost you a good bit more than it would the newbie.
Oh, and you'd be losing training because obviously not going to use +5s in Bubble-land.
Oh and you could be making isk in highsec ~safely~. Hmm, well ... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
62
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:13:00 -
[362] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: Considering the newbies in the fleets, I think you'd be ok with rifters. The problem is updating your clone will cost you a good bit more than it would the newbie.
Oh, and you'd be losing training because obviously not going to use +5s in Bubble-land.
Oh and you could be making isk in highsec ~safely~. Hmm, well ...
Not to mention all the loot pinatas that mission runners would try to bring. We once had a guy try to bring a faction/deadspace fit rupture on a welp rupture roam *ohgodwhy* "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
163
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:26:00 -
[363] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote:Caitlyn Tufy wrote:As for wrestling out your own spot in the world - everything is possible and nobody is undefeatable. If anything, oldschool Goons with their cheap frigate tactics back in the day can serve as a perfect example of what a focused, determined bunch of players can do. But if one expects to have it easy, one should stay in high sec. With a half decent FC and a ten minute fleet ops 101 lesson, yes you can take mission runners (with lots of juicy sp) and miners (these guys are useless) and kill leet pvp players, I've seen it done with total noobs all the time. Considering the newbies in the fleets, I think you'd be ok with rifters. The problem is updating your clone will cost you a good bit more than it would the newbie. Oh, and you'd be losing training because obviously not going to use +5s in Bubble-land. Oh and you could be making isk in highsec ~safely~. Hmm, well ...
Oh noes, not Meh training time.
Granted it kinda sucks, but really at 30-40mil you should have a pretty solid combat skill set. Not to mention the most pump ship gets dull pretty fast in missions. I'll usually run a +4 for whatever my primary is, and they collect so I end up with a couple 150 nil pods lost, but that's just the cost of doing business.
Running 19 jumps through three camsp with a velator and a bomber, much more lively. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:29:00 -
[364] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Oh noes, not Meh training time.
Granted it kinda sucks, but really at 30-40mil you should have a pretty solid combat skill set. Not to mention the most pump ship gets dull pretty fast in missions. I'll usually run a +4 for whatever my primary is, and they collect so I end up with a couple 150 nil pods lost, but that's just the cost of doing business.
Running 19 jumps through three camsp with a velator and a bomber, much more lively. Yeah, for what it's worth I have 2 +4s in my battleship using main (this character) but never got in a fight....
My bomber alt uses +3s, but it doesn't have cybernetics IV. Funny to think that a +4 implant could get a newbie another blackbird though... I think the newbies get reimbursed enough that they can fly blackbirds all the time and jam Makalu for the 10s before he dies and gets podded. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:31:00 -
[365] - Quote
+whatever-using scrubs. real men train without implants. |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:31:00 -
[366] - Quote
Uphill. Both ways. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1174
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:33:00 -
[367] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:Not to mention all the loot pinatas that mission runners would try to bring. We once had a guy try to bring a faction/deadspace fit rupture on a welp rupture roam *ohgodwhy* Ugh, no way. Welp. Sometimes there are reasons to go faction etc, but not when you're going to die in something that isn't already an expensive hull. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
364
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:34:00 -
[368] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:+whatever-using scrubs. real men train without implants.
Real men PvP without updated med-clones. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1175
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:36:00 -
[369] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Lord Zim wrote:+whatever-using scrubs. real men train without implants. Real men PvP without updated med-clones. Let me tell you a tale of losing a mindlinked alphaclone.
It's called Losing Fleet Command V, and every newbie should learn about it so they know why you should always keep your clone updated to hold all your skillpoints. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

baltec1
Bat Country
1627
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:37:00 -
[370] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Uphill. Both ways.
In the snow, while its raining hail and rain. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
163
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:38:00 -
[371] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Lord Zim wrote:+whatever-using scrubs. real men train without implants. Real men PvP without updated med-clones.
Done that, last weekend actually......fortunately, it was only 4 hours.....because the skill was AWU V.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
1627
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:39:00 -
[372] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote:Not to mention all the loot pinatas that mission runners would try to bring. We once had a guy try to bring a faction/deadspace fit rupture on a welp rupture roam *ohgodwhy* Ugh, no way. Welp. Sometimes there are reasons to go faction etc, but not when you're going to die in something that isn't already an expensive hull.
One time I am going to bring a faction navy mega. Just once because I can. |

Degren
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1812
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:41:00 -
[373] - Quote
The best part of the thread are the 11 upvotes to the OP.
Someone agrees with you, keep posting!
Maybe you can dethrone them together! Better consult the chart. |

Slow P Oke
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
35
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:43:00 -
[374] - Quote
THIS JUST IN!
RELATIVE NEWCOMER GOONSWARM FEDERATION HAS DETHRONED NORTHERN COALITION, THE LONG STANDING POWER BLOC OF EVE ONLINE, SO DEEPLY INGRAINED IN EVE SOCIETY IT WAS LONG CONSIDERED TOO BIG TO FAIL
MORE NEWS AT 11 |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1175
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:44:00 -
[375] - Quote
Slow P Oke wrote:THIS JUST IN!
RELATIVE NEWCOMER GOONSWARM FEDERATION HAS DETHRONED NORTHERN COALITION, THE LONG STANDING POWER BLOC OF EVE ONLINE, SO DEEPLY INGRAINED IN EVE SOCIETY IT WAS LONG CONSIDERED TOO BIG TO FAIL
MORE NEWS AT 11 Guess CCP didn't bail them out eh. So much for too big to fail.
Oh wait, this wasn't a banker bailout reference, was it. It was a goons are too massive reference. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:46:00 -
[376] - Quote
I can confirm I am, indeed, too massive.
As is my neckbeard. |

Bob Nesta Marley
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:47:00 -
[377] - Quote
I'm fairly certain it was a "Do something about it or stop whining" post. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:20:00 -
[378] - Quote
Degren wrote:The best part of the thread are the 11 upvotes to the OP.
Someone agrees with you, keep posting!
Maybe you can dethrone them together! Stop trolling or i report it and just simply get your posts removed.
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Im srry i have to agree with him, i agree with that PL issue, but atleast cfc have the isk to buy it if they woudnt have it (im not saying they do or do not, just saying they have the ability to buy it if its needed) I can either buy myself one pimpfit nyx on the market, or I can build myself two pimpfit nyxes (and spend 2 months doing so). The open market only has so much capacity, and you will get gauged if you do so. Money is not the problem, build capacity is.. Build time on a mom 3-4 weeks? In current situation with all the otech friends and gained isk from it its not possible to put any supers in the oven in any SoCo allaince. It would be suicide. This current situation exists due isk gaining from the tech moons. I get your point. All im saying is that it is completly safe to build supers in CFC at the moment while it isnt in SoCo and its caused by the tech isk. It is an exponential thing, it cant be stopped by recruiting more people or buying more supers with isk as the tech income is just sooo redicules high. Next step in this whole process is taking sov preventing SoCo any income. Do you see where im going to? Combine this with the devfleet public image that is existing and i forsee not much member growth this year for eve. Alot of ppl are allready pissed off by this and it will only go downwards. Effecting general eve population and thus everyone...
tiberiusric wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Stop talking out of your ass.... what a stupid quote... when goons have 9000 players, have been established alot longer, make trillions of isk per month. Then what shall the OP go and suddenly recruit 9000 good players out of thin air? and offer them nothing as he has nothing? You sir are stupid, and i dont usually post, but comments like this annoy the hell outta me. Even the strong NC., Evoke, PL cant even do it and they are some of the best pvp alliances in eve, how do you expect some random to do it... seriously think about what you say before posting total and utter rubbish. To the OP, I think alot of people totally agree with you, but CCP continues to do sweet FA, the game has become saturated and people are starting to get a little f*cked off now. But again CCP and Goons seem to be controlling the game. Goons win EVE
Goon win eve and alot of ppl quit eve. Not my loss rly as i pay with plex anyway. I wonder if CCP would care about this as much as they care about forcing eve being Barby-Online about a year ago.... |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:30:00 -
[379] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Build time on a mom 3-4 weeks? In current situation with all the otech friends and gained isk from it its not possible to put any supers in the oven in any SoCo allaince. It would be suicide. This has nothing to do with tech money, and everything to do with soco being a bunch of whinyassed pansies who can't even undock without getting slaughtered to a man.
forestwho wrote:This current situation exists due isk gaining from the tech moons. Nope. It exists because -A- is ****. 2 days from "we're going to burn your **** down" to "yipe yipe yipe BACK TO NPC STAIN RUN HIDE AAAAAA". They had the manpower and the hardware to make this a long, interesting and bloody war, yet they just ran away like a beaten dog with its tail between their legs the instant their 3-1 advantage turned into more of a 1-1 "advantage".
That's so pathetic it pegs the pathetic-o-meter.
forestwho wrote:I get your point. All im saying is that it is completly safe to build supers in CFC at the moment while it isnt in SoCo and its caused by the tech isk. Nope. The reason it's "completely safe to build supers in CFC" while it "isn't in SoCo" is because SoCo aren't hitting back. Hell, they're not even defending their own ****, all they're doing is throwing away a super or a titan worth of isk a day by undocking T3s into drakes.
forestwho wrote:It is an exponential thing, it cant be stopped by recruiting more people or buying more supers with isk as the tech income is just sooo redicules high. Them being **** is what's stopping them from recruiting more people, not the lack of isk. Again, they've lost multiple fleets of T3s, they're not hurting for isk.
forestwho wrote:Next step in this whole process is taking sov preventing SoCo any income. Do you see where im going to? Combine this with the devfleet public image that is existing and i forsee not much member growth this year for eve. Alot of ppl are allready pissed off by this and it will only go downwards. Effecting general eve population and thus everyone...
Goon win eve and alot of ppl quit eve. Not my loss rly as i pay with plex anyway. I wonder if CCP would care about this as much as they care about forcing eve being Barby-Online about a year ago.... You know what this reminds me of, nearly word for word?
The NC.
Where, pray tell, is the NC now? |

Jonah Gravenstein
601
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:31:00 -
[380] - Quote
tiberiusric wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Stop talking out of your ass.... what a stupid quote... when goons have 9000 players, have been established alot longer, make trillions of isk per month. Then what shall the OP go and suddenly recruit 9000 good players out of thin air? and offer them nothing as he has nothing? You sir are stupid, and i dont usually post, but comments like this annoy the hell outta me.
Pray tell who did I quote? and I don't possess a donkey to talk out of.
Goons weren't always a massive corp with oodles of isk, they still managed to carve themselves a niche in null and beat the bejesus out of BoB in the process. For an example of what can be done you only have to look at their rise to power and infamy, follow their example, recruit, blob the hell out of them with noobships, infiltrate them, use their own successful tactics against them. If goons can rise to the top of this seething cesspool we call Eve then so can anybody else with enough determination & friends.
As I originally said it requires teamwork and effort, if that makes me stupid then so be it.
tiberiusric wrote:Even the strong NC., Evoke, PL cant even do it and they are some of the best pvp alliances in eve, how do you expect some random to do it... seriously think about what you say before posting total and utter rubbish.
To the OP, I think alot of people totally agree with you, but CCP continues to do sweet FA, the game has become saturated and people are starting to get a little f*cked off now. But again CCP and Goons seem to be controlling the game. Goons win EVE
If NC., Evoke, PL and their ilk teamed up (see there's that teamwork thing again) then I have no doubt they could give goons, TEST etc. a damn good run for their money, but they won't because they hate each other more than they hate the CFC, and collectively couldn't organise a drunken outing in a brewery without shooting each other in the face. The old adage "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" springs to mind but that just ain't going to happen.
As for CCP and goons controlling the game, well duh it's CCPs game and at present goons seem to be creating a lot more publicity and content than anybody else at the moment so of course CCP are going to support them to a certain extent, but not to the extent all the tinfoil haberdashery fans would like to think.
TL;DR [sarcasm]I'm so stupid that when I typed this I stopped breathing because my braincell (singular) couldn't handle doing 2 things at once, oh and I talk out of my arse (which is not a donkey)[/sarcasm] War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

baltec1
Bat Country
1628
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:34:00 -
[381] - Quote
forestwho wrote: Goon win eve and alot of ppl quit eve. Not my loss rly as i pay with plex anyway. I wonder if CCP would care about this as much as they care about forcing eve being Barby-Online about a year ago....
They care about as much as when the NC was king of 0.0 and all those other impossible to kill superpowers that are no more. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:37:00 -
[382] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:tiberiusric wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Stop talking out of your ass.... what a stupid quote... when goons have 9000 players, have been established alot longer, make trillions of isk per month. Then what shall the OP go and suddenly recruit 9000 good players out of thin air? and offer them nothing as he has nothing? You sir are stupid, and i dont usually post, but comments like this annoy the hell outta me. Even the strong NC., Evoke, PL cant even do it and they are some of the best pvp alliances in eve, how do you expect some random to do it... seriously think about what you say before posting total and utter rubbish. To the OP, I think alot of people totally agree with you, but CCP continues to do sweet FA, the game has become saturated and people are starting to get a little f*cked off now. But again CCP and Goons seem to be controlling the game. Goons win EVE There are a lot more people who aren't in the GSF than that are. Assuming every GSF member has 2 accounts and only one character in Goonswarm, 18k accounts are owned by GSF members. There are 361k active accounts. That means Goonswarm represents, at the upper limit, 5% of the playerbase (and those are kind of ridiculous assumptions). Now, another good number is the last QEN snapshot of Character location, which puts 86k Characters in Null. That means that Goonswarm represents about 10% of the Nullsec population. So you've got 90% of the Nullsec population, and 95+% of the general population to recruit from. So, I guess my question is: What's your next excuse?
Your doing it wrong, i can pull numbers out my ass too..... 361 active accounts, avarage of 2 accounts = 150k real players. of which 43k in null. of which
9000 = 4500 in GS 7700 = 3850 in Test 2900 = 1500 in Razor 2700 = 1500 in FA 12000= 6000 other random CFC pets (inc you PL)
= 17350 members lets say for equalness that SoCo has same numbers (which isnt correct due you obvius blobbing them all time)
Than you come out on 34700 ish ppl that are tied up in this war or 80,6% of null sec population. Of the other 20% there are some renters ect blah blah, main thing here is that your talking out you ass with made up numbers... maybe me too but your more wrong than me 
So theres like a rly small pool to recruit from which reflects CCP's butterly effect that more ppl are leaving null sec due the broken game mechanics than they are trying to get people in 0.0 with improved mechanics.
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
364
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:37:00 -
[383] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Im srry i have to agree with him, i agree with that PL issue, but atleast cfc have the isk to buy it if they woudnt have it (im not saying they do or do not, just saying they have the ability to buy it if its needed) I can either buy myself one pimpfit nyx on the market, or I can build myself two pimpfit nyxes (and spend 2 months doing so). The open market only has so much capacity, and you will get gauged if you do so. Money is not the problem, build capacity is.. Build time on a mom 3-4 weeks? In current situation with all the otech friends and gained isk from it its not possible to put any supers in the oven in any SoCo allaince. It would be suicide. This current situation exists due isk gaining from the tech moons. I get your point. All im saying is that it is completly safe to build supers in CFC at the moment while it isnt in SoCo and its caused by the tech isk. It is an exponential thing, it cant be stopped by recruiting more people or buying more supers with isk as the tech income is just sooo redicules high. Next step in this whole process is taking sov preventing SoCo any income. Do you see where im going to? Combine this with the devfleet public image that is existing and i forsee not much member growth this year for eve. Alot of ppl are allready pissed off by this and it will only go downwards. Effecting general eve population and thus everyone...
I thought you claimed that the CFC bought their Supers off the open market.
Anyway, SOCO could have prepared by getting some Supers ready: "He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared." Sun Tzu wrote it down 2500 years ago, how did SoCo not figure it out?
It is exactly as safe to build Supers in CFC space as SoCo allows it to be. If SoCo thinks the reason they're losing is the CFC's Super production, they should be out RFing POSes.
So one person with 10b can stop 10 guys with 1b between them? Nope. SoCo could have treated their friends well and taken steps to keep morale high (or not left a tasty looking war going on in Delve ), and they'd be doing much better.
As for the "DevFleet" accusation, do you have any evidence to support your insinuations (or even a concrete accusation? At least Jade Constantine provides concrete accusations). -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
364
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:41:00 -
[384] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:tiberiusric wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:TL;DR Goons and pals control all the tech, and I can't be arsed to do anything about it. Want that tech? take it, just like they did. :effort: :teamwork:  Stop talking out of your ass.... what a stupid quote... when goons have 9000 players, have been established alot longer, make trillions of isk per month. Then what shall the OP go and suddenly recruit 9000 good players out of thin air? and offer them nothing as he has nothing? You sir are stupid, and i dont usually post, but comments like this annoy the hell outta me. Even the strong NC., Evoke, PL cant even do it and they are some of the best pvp alliances in eve, how do you expect some random to do it... seriously think about what you say before posting total and utter rubbish. To the OP, I think alot of people totally agree with you, but CCP continues to do sweet FA, the game has become saturated and people are starting to get a little f*cked off now. But again CCP and Goons seem to be controlling the game. Goons win EVE There are a lot more people who aren't in the GSF than that are. Assuming every GSF member has 2 accounts and only one character in Goonswarm, 18k accounts are owned by GSF members. There are 361k active accounts. That means Goonswarm represents, at the upper limit, 5% of the playerbase (and those are kind of ridiculous assumptions). Now, another good number is the last QEN snapshot of Character location, which puts 86k Characters in Null. That means that Goonswarm represents about 10% of the Nullsec population. So you've got 90% of the Nullsec population, and 95+% of the general population to recruit from. So, I guess my question is: What's your next excuse? Your doing it wrong, i can pull numbers out my ass too..... 361 active accounts, avarage of 2 accounts = 150k real players. of which 43k in null. of which 9000 = 4500 in GS 7700 = 3850 in Test 2900 = 1500 in Razor 2700 = 1500 in FA 12000= 6000 other random CFC pets (inc you PL) = 17350 members lets say for equalness that SoCo has same numbers (which isnt correct due you obvius blobbing them all time) Than you come out on 34700 ish ppl that are tied up in this war or 80,6% of null sec population. Of the other 20% there are some renters ect blah blah, main thing here is that your talking out you ass with made up numbers... maybe me too but your more wrong than me  So theres like a rly small pool to recruit from which reflects CCP's butterly effect that more ppl are leaving null sec due the broken game mechanics than they are trying to get people in 0.0 with improved mechanics.
Since when is 34700k ( ) 80% of 86k?
You first assume that everyone has 2 characters in Null, then you decline to divide every alliance's numbers by 2 to account for that? 
Try again when you understand how math works. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:42:00 -
[385] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Build time on a mom 3-4 weeks? In current situation with all the otech friends and gained isk from it its not possible to put any supers in the oven in any SoCo allaince. It would be suicide. This has nothing to do with tech money, and everything to do with soco being a bunch of whinyassed pansies who can't even undock without getting slaughtered to a man. forestwho wrote:This current situation exists due isk gaining from the tech moons. Nope. It exists because -A- is ****. 2 days from "we're going to burn your **** down" to "yipe yipe yipe BACK TO NPC STAIN RUN HIDE AAAAAA". They had the manpower and the hardware to make this a long, interesting and bloody war, yet they just ran away like a beaten dog with its tail between their legs the instant their 3-1 advantage turned into more of a 1-1 "advantage". That's so pathetic it pegs the pathetic-o-meter. forestwho wrote:I get your point. All im saying is that it is completly safe to build supers in CFC at the moment while it isnt in SoCo and its caused by the tech isk. Nope. The reason it's "completely safe to build supers in CFC" while it "isn't in SoCo" is because SoCo aren't hitting back. Hell, they're not even defending their own ****, all they're doing is throwing away a super or a titan worth of isk a day by undocking T3s into drakes. forestwho wrote:It is an exponential thing, it cant be stopped by recruiting more people or buying more supers with isk as the tech income is just sooo redicules high. Them being **** is what's stopping them from recruiting more people, not the lack of isk. Again, they've lost multiple fleets of T3s, they're not hurting for isk. You know what this reminds me of, nearly word for word? The NC. Where, pray tell, is the NC now?
You repeating your selve over and over, its because of the tech income, the formed OTECH and the increased recruitment (indirect Tech related) which allows CFC to outblob SoCo 4-1... No one will fight you those numbers. Indirect its cause due the whole tech issue.
|

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:44:00 -
[386] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Since when is 34700k (  ) 80% of 86k? You first assume that everyone has 2 characters in Null, then you decline to divide every alliance's numbers by 2 to account for that?  Try again when you understand how math works.
Because your a noob that cant read, read it again, you may edit your post.... |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
364
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:45:00 -
[387] - Quote
forestwho wrote: You repeating your selve over and over, its because of the tech income, the formed OTECH and the increased recruitment (indirect Tech related) which allows CFC to outblob SoCo 4-1... No one will fight you those numbers. Indirect its cause due the whole tech issue.
You still have yet to show how Tech turns into "Players Logging On."
Your big red tinfoil boat/hat keeps sailing in circles. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8508
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:46:00 -
[388] - Quote
forestwho wrote:i can pull numbers out my ass too..... 361 active accounts, avarage of 2 accounts = 150k real players. of which 43k in null. Well, you got that first part right. None of those numbers have any connection to reality.
If you're going to do that, why not just claim that Goon outnumbers all of EVE by a factor of 3:1? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:46:00 -
[389] - Quote
forestwho wrote:You repeating your selve over and over, its because of the tech income, the formed OTECH and the increased recruitment (indirect Tech related) which allows CFC to outblob SoCo 4-1... No one will fight you those numbers. Indirect its cause due the whole tech issue. You're repeating the same fallacious arguments, time and time again, I'm smacking down the fallacious arguments with the same facts, time and time again.
SoCo "outblobbed" first by bringing -A- etc and bringing up to 800 people after nulli and red alliance couldn't win every fight against PL and test. We counterescalated and said, in no uncertain terms, that we weren't there for good fights, since you guys obviously weren't either.
Sucks to be you. Have a piece of humble pie and be less awful at coalition-building next time.
PS: It's not due to tech. This would've happened with or without tech. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:47:00 -
[390] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:forestwho wrote: You repeating your selve over and over, its because of the tech income, the formed OTECH and the increased recruitment (indirect Tech related) which allows CFC to outblob SoCo 4-1... No one will fight you those numbers. Indirect its cause due the whole tech issue.
You still have yet to show how Tech turns into "Players Logging On." Your big red tinfoil boat/hat keeps sailing in circles.
The tech holders neutral alts keeps giving answeres that are going in circles, about how the tech income doesnt affect 0.0 situaltion at all....
I dont rly blame you for that, if i had tech moons i probaly would do the same
Tippia wrote:forestwho wrote:i can pull numbers out my ass too..... 361 active accounts, avarage of 2 accounts = 150k real players. of which 43k in null. Well, you got that first part right. None of those numbers have any connection to reality. If you're going to do that, why not just claim that Goon outnumbers all of EVE by a factor of 3:1?
Like i said, i can pull out numbers out my ass aswel, im not saying they are right, im just saying his numbers were more wrong than mine  |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:48:00 -
[391] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Because your a noob that cant read, read it again, you may edit your post.... and ask yourselve, whats 43k form 86k.... Pot, stop calling the kettle black. It's racist.
forestwho wrote:Stop trolling or i report it and just simply get your posts removed. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8508
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:51:00 -
[392] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:You still have yet to show how Tech turns into "Players Logging On." The tech holders neutral alts keeps giving answeres that are going in circles, about how the tech income doesnt affect 0.0 situaltion at all.... GǪand that still doesn't mean you've shown how tech turns into players logging on.
Quote:Like i said, i can pull out numbers out my ass aswel Then don't try to make an argument out of them. His arguments at least had some kind of reasoning behind them (even though the number of active accounts is higher than what he said, last anyone heard, but that only makes his point even stronger). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

baltec1
Bat Country
1628
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:52:00 -
[393] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Like i said, i can pull out numbers out my ass aswel, im not saying they are right, im just saying his numbers were more wrong than mine 
This is different to the NC and its colossal income how? |

Halete
Echoes of Korgoth Initiative
260
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:53:00 -
[394] - Quote
I think the headline should read "Coalition of super-friends lead by retired furry married to a beard and a BR with 900 ping triumphs over oppressive southern capitalist war giant". Dirty heretical mud-child, reporting in. // Throwing one's hands up in the air and crying 'cal-matar nonsense!' seems to be the new dismissive these days when someone is being neither relevant nor dignified. |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:55:00 -
[395] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:forestwho wrote:Like i said, i can pull out numbers out my ass aswel, im not saying they are right, im just saying his numbers were more wrong than mine  This is different to the NC and its colossal income how? The NC is dead, Goons are not.
*** Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc. :science: |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:56:00 -
[396] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Because your a noob that cant read, read it again, you may edit your post.... and ask yourselve, whats 43k form 86k.... Pot, stop calling the kettle black. It's racist. forestwho wrote:Stop trolling or i report it and just simply get your posts removed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j--tixvta_g&feature=related
Tippia wrote:and that still doesn't mean you've shown how tech turns into players logging on.
I have explained that somewhere half way this thread. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8508
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:01:00 -
[397] - Quote
forestwho wrote:I have explained that somewhere half way this thread. Could you link it?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
364
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:02:00 -
[398] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Since when is 34700k (  ) 80% of 86k? You first assume that everyone has 2 characters in Null, then you decline to divide every alliance's numbers by 2 to account for that?  Try again when you understand how math works. Because your a noob that cant read, read it again, you may edit your post.... and ask yourselve, whats 43k form 86k....
Ok, so I misread that because of your terrible ability to estimate the number of people involved. There are enough large alliances playing no part in Delve that your claim that there's only 20% of the population not involved is laughable.
None of the other Alliances you listed are in Goonswarm. They're allied. That means you can recruit them away from Goonswarm by convincing them that you'll be better allies to them than Goonswarm will. Uhhhhnfortunately, Goonswarm tends to treat their allies with respect and cheerful help, while most of SoCo tends to treat their allies like something they stepped in.
So, 90% of Nullsec Population is still available if you can break their alliances with GSF (Hint: The Beatles said it best). Heck, half of DelveJam isn't even in the CFC, so certainly splitting up a coalition formed with the express purpose of stomping... oh...
Well, turns out the South's poor reputation is causing it some PR problems when it comes to bringing in Friends (or as they call them, Pets) in this great war between North and South. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
239
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:02:00 -
[399] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:PS: It's not due to tech. This would've happened with or without tech. I think we all know that the CFC were BFFs with ev0ke and NCdot long before OTEC. |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:03:00 -
[400] - Quote
No, what you've done is assume tech is the reason literally all of soco stopped logging in. It isn't.
Walltreipers Alliance, an alliance of 376 people, have absolutely no tech, yet they're fighting harder for their one system than the 20k of the rest of soco.
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/WALLTREIPERS_ALLIANCE http://walltreipers.eve-kill.net/?a=alliance_detail&view=kills&all_id=6075&m=7&y=2012 |

Halete
Echoes of Korgoth Initiative
260
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:04:00 -
[401] - Quote
Those brave internet spaceship samurais.
 Dirty heretical mud-child, reporting in. // Throwing one's hands up in the air and crying 'cal-matar nonsense!' seems to be the new dismissive these days when someone is being neither relevant nor dignified. |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:06:00 -
[402] - Quote
It's quite refreshing. It actually makes me go all daww and want to cuddle them and treat them well, not shoot them. :shobon: |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
364
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:06:00 -
[403] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:Lord Zim wrote:PS: It's not due to tech. This would've happened with or without tech. I think we all know that the CFC were BFFs with ev0ke and NCdot long before OTEC.
Last I heard NC. is sitting this one out, and Hey, so is ev0ke. So how do they fit into the Delve situation? -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Easthir Ravin
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
49
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:08:00 -
[404] - Quote
Greetings
All this talk about Tech and fairness is kind of a moot point. Yes some hold all the Tech, and some think it unfair and it needs to change. What you are missing though, is that it doesn't matter what that change is, as you will ultimately complain about it being unfair as well.
I say this because the type of player that bands together to form organizations that can hold all the Tech are the type that will roll with whatever change comes along and make it work in their favor. If you do not think that they most likely have plans for when Tech gets "balanced" you are confused.
Just think though, you have it relatively easy. All you are required to do is change the name of the mechanic you don't like and re-post the same old crap.
vr East IN THE IMORTAL WORDS OF SOCRATES: -á" I drank WHAT?!" |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
239
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:12:00 -
[405] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Vera Algaert wrote:Lord Zim wrote:PS: It's not due to tech. This would've happened with or without tech. I think we all know that the CFC were BFFs with ev0ke and NCdot long before OTEC. Last I heard NC. is sitting this one out, and Hey, so is ev0ke. So how do they fit into the Delve situation? In my version of a "no tech" alternate reality they would be hitting CFC moons in the North now instead of fighting SOLAR in Geminate.
Doubtful if it would have much of an impact on Delve/Querious but it might make a difference with rgds to just how far CFC+HB push the SoCo back. |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:14:00 -
[406] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:Doubtful if it would have much of an impact on Delve/Querious but it might make a difference with rgds to just how far CFC+HB push the SoCo back. Given the comms **** we're getting out of this? Doubtful. That **** is priceless. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
364
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:22:00 -
[407] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Vera Algaert wrote:Lord Zim wrote:PS: It's not due to tech. This would've happened with or without tech. I think we all know that the CFC were BFFs with ev0ke and NCdot long before OTEC. Last I heard NC. is sitting this one out, and Hey, so is ev0ke. So how do they fit into the Delve situation? In my version of a "no tech" alternate reality they would be hitting CFC moons in the North now instead of fighting SOLAR in Geminate. Doubtful if it would have much of an impact on Delve/Querious but it might make a difference with rgds to just how far CFC+HB push the SoCo back.
Why would they be hitting Moons if there were no Tech?
Right now they're fighting SOLAR because SOLAR shot first. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Max50
Parental Control
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:28:00 -
[408] - Quote
I think people are missing the point when it comes to think of changes from CCP.
CCP will make changes to keep the game running,this doesnt mean that it will actually make the game better for all players.
Anyone remembers the days of NC?How loved they were together...brofist etc?The one day supers got boosted and suddenly the ruskies that had lots of them pull the numbers in subcaps and ofc outnumbered NC's supercaps.NC fell,propably because of the combination of doing over and over the same thing(defending long boring gaming hours etc over and over) and because a few game changes gave the edge to someone else. Time passes and the game gets static again.Goons try...whatever they try but they get stomped over and over in a boring wall of supercarriers,virtually invicible if you didnt had more supercaps.Then the first supercap rebalancing(nerf for onwers like me,fair balancing for the rest) but again that wasnt enough since the blap titans appeared. Blap titans made it possible for a single alliance like raiden to defend succesfully against a coalition of alliances.The game became static again since CFC couldnt stand getting blapped on a daily and boring basis so a next new thing should come to change this.So now we have the new "rebalanced" titans.
Although i participated in opposite side of goons,i cannot say that the game isnt changed for good.
Players have 3-4 options:
1)either join the "winning side"
2)start crying more than goons did about everything 3)get organised
4)adapt.
Crying about it isnt an option.Like any mmorpg,EVE has to give the players the carrot to keep the rabbits running behind it.Thats how this game works.CCP chose tech to keep a big part of its memberbase running behind something they think is important. But the fact is that it isnt important if you dont let it be.Adapt or die i guess.
I use to make ISK by doing lvl4 missions in empire and later ratting plexing in -1.0 systems.I thought that i knew my **** untill i tried lvl5 missions.Doing them propably not only gives more ISK,it gives you a ISK you dont know what to do so you just stop farming.I am not doing wallet show off here,since i am certain some other guy will tell me that he is better than me and makes even more by ...lets say trading. Always adapt,always look for some new for ISK making,for manufacturing or for PVPing.Its what makes the game interesting.
CFC will die in the future,just like BOB died,just like the ruskie coalition died,just like NC died after so many wars etc etc.
Death of powerblocks is what keeps this game ticking.The problem is what you or me g |

Florestan Bronstein
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
552
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:33:00 -
[409] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Vera Algaert wrote:Doubtful if it would have much of an impact on Delve/Querious but it might make a difference with rgds to just how far CFC+HB push the SoCo back. Given the comms **** we're getting out of this? Doubtful. That **** is priceless. there is no certainty in "What if the Germans had won the battle for Britain"-level speculation.
In my opinion in such a scenario there would have been more pressure on SOLAR to get involved (no "we're already helping you by preventing NCdot from coming to Delve, so be happy and stfu") and the CFC would at some point have to clean up their home.
As I said I think it might make a difference once you come to the "do we follow into Catch/Stain?" question but if you disagree that's fine.
(posted on my main so you can stop claiming I'm ignorant about the state of Delve) |

Lord Zim
1018
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:50:00 -
[410] - Quote
I wasn't claiming you were ignorant about the state of delve, I was just stuck in the "no tech" line of argument. And I would've taken your latest post seriously even if you hadn't posted on "your main", because it does make sense. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:54:00 -
[411] - Quote
Max50 wrote:I think people are missing the point when it comes to think of changes from CCP.
CCP will make changes to keep the game running,this doesnt mean that it will actually make the game better for all players.
Anyone remembers the days of NC?How loved they were together...brofist etc?The one day supers got boosted and suddenly the ruskies that had lots of them pull the numbers in subcaps and ofc outnumbered NC's supercaps.NC fell,propably because of the combination of doing over and over the same thing(defending long boring gaming hours etc over and over) and because a few game changes gave the edge to someone else. Time passes and the game gets static again.Goons try...whatever they try but they get stomped over and over in a boring wall of supercarriers,virtually invicible if you didnt had more supercaps.Then the first supercap rebalancing(nerf for onwers like me,fair balancing for the rest) but again that wasnt enough since the blap titans appeared. Blap titans made it possible for a single alliance like raiden to defend succesfully against a coalition of alliances.The game became static again since CFC couldnt stand getting blapped on a daily and boring basis so a next new thing should come to change this.So now we have the new "rebalanced" titans.
Although i participated in opposite side of goons,i cannot say that the game isnt changed for good.
Players have 3-4 options:
1)either join the "winning side"
2)start crying more than goons did about everything 3)get organised
4)adapt.
Crying about it isnt an option.Like any mmorpg,EVE has to give the players the carrot to keep the rabbits running behind it.Thats how this game works.CCP chose tech to keep a big part of its memberbase running behind something they think is important. But the fact is that it isnt important if you dont let it be.Adapt or die i guess.
I use to make ISK by doing lvl4 missions in empire and later ratting plexing in -1.0 systems.I thought that i knew my **** untill i tried lvl5 missions.Doing them propably not only gives more ISK,it gives you a ISK you dont know what to do so you just stop farming.I am not doing wallet show off here,since i am certain some other guy will tell me that he is better than me and makes even more by ...lets say trading. Always adapt,always look for some new for ISK making,for manufacturing or for PVPing.Its what makes the game interesting.
CFC will die in the future,just like BOB died,just like the ruskie coalition died,just like NC died after so many wars etc etc.
Death of powerblocks is what keeps this game ticking.The problem is what you or me g
The CFC may die like BoB did, maybe, at some far point in the future. But so far Goonswarm has been destroyed a few times and each time we come back far stronger than before.
|

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:58:00 -
[412] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:
Edit: Blap titans were almost as game breaking as remote Doomsdays. Perhaps moreso.
Atleast they were getting fixed, ring mining gets introduced in winterpatch prolly november thats alot of tech isk to be bottled up untill that time |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 12:01:00 -
[413] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Andrey Wartooth wrote:
Edit: Blap titans were almost as game breaking as remote Doomsdays. Perhaps moreso.
Atleast they were getting fixed, ring mining gets introduced in winterpatch prolly november thats alot of tech isk isk to be bottled up untill that time
Ring mining is much much more content heavy than fixing some numbers in the database. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to find out. Personally I'm looking forward to when Ring Mining comes out and isn't broken. (I don't think CCP can get it right the first go around) I know lots and lots of Goons are also looking forward to ring mining as well.
We are all for expanding gameplay, and not at all for limiting it. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
164
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 12:20:00 -
[414] - Quote
http://soundcloud.com/sindel-pellion/titan
LOL who sang it so I can, throw them some isk. That was hilarios. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 12:26:00 -
[415] - Quote
Onictus wrote:http://soundcloud.com/sindel-pellion/titan
LOL who sang it so I can, throw them some isk. That was hilarios.
I'm guessing Sindel Pellion of TEST. I'm glad you are taking losing all your space so well. |

JitaPriceChecker2
State War Academy Caldari State
179
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 12:30:00 -
[416] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:forestwho wrote:Like i said, i can pull out numbers out my ass aswel, im not saying they are right, im just saying his numbers were more wrong than mine  This is different to the NC and its colossal income how?
LOL
NC died due to botted and rmted supercarriers that were buffed prior to invasion.
So no NC did't die because grunts mobilized and because of "effort" |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 12:31:00 -
[417] - Quote
JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:baltec1 wrote:forestwho wrote:Like i said, i can pull out numbers out my ass aswel, im not saying they are right, im just saying his numbers were more wrong than mine  This is different to the NC and its colossal income how? LOL NC died due to botted and rmted supercarriers that were buffed prior to invasion. So no NC did't die because grunts mobilized and because of "effort"
Do you have any evidence of botting and/or RMTing? |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
164
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 12:33:00 -
[418] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:Onictus wrote:http://soundcloud.com/sindel-pellion/titan
LOL who sang it so I can, throw them some isk. That was hilarios. I'm guessing Sindel Pellion of TEST. I'm glad you are taking losing all your space so well.
Why so serious?
I'm just a hired gun, on my end, all I need is a target, and FC and maybe a Titan pilot to get me there and I'm happy, if I'm in SOV space or NPC means no nevermind to me.
I didn't move to null to build outposts and fuel POS's. |

JitaPriceChecker2
State War Academy Caldari State
179
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 12:35:00 -
[419] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:baltec1 wrote:forestwho wrote:Like i said, i can pull out numbers out my ass aswel, im not saying they are right, im just saying his numbers were more wrong than mine  This is different to the NC and its colossal income how? LOL NC died due to botted and rmted supercarriers that were buffed prior to invasion. So no NC did't die because grunts mobilized and because of "effort" Do you have any evidence of botting and/or RMTing?
Yes there were a lot of documented cases of botes in drone region, that belonged to the solar fleet and their pets. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 12:42:00 -
[420] - Quote
JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:Andrey Wartooth wrote:JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:baltec1 wrote:forestwho wrote:Like i said, i can pull out numbers out my ass aswel, im not saying they are right, im just saying his numbers were more wrong than mine  This is different to the NC and its colossal income how? LOL NC died due to botted and rmted supercarriers that were buffed prior to invasion. So no NC did't die because grunts mobilized and because of "effort" Do you have any evidence of botting and/or RMTing? Yes there were a lot of documented cases of botes in drone region, that belonged to the solar fleet and their pets.
Uh, you do know that Solar was not part of the NC right? They were actually part o the -A- Wagon back then and were fighting against the NC. |

JitaPriceChecker2
State War Academy Caldari State
179
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 12:47:00 -
[421] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:[quote=JitaPriceChecker2]
Uh, you do know that Solar was not part of the NC right? They were actually part o the -A- Wagon back then and were fighting against the NC.
NO ? I remember shooting SOLAR abbadons in geminate so stop posting because you have no clue.
They may be fighintg now but not when OLD NC falled. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 13:05:00 -
[422] - Quote
JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:Andrey Wartooth wrote:
Uh, you do know that Solar was not part of the NC right? They were actually part o the -A- Wagon back then and were fighting against the NC.
NO ? I remember shooting SOLAR abbadons in geminate so stop posting because you have no clue. They may be fighintg now but not when OLD NC falled.
Really? Do you have any evidence to back this up, faceless person?
Quote:Red Alliance offshoot, consisting largely of the corps Solar Dragons and Russian SOBR, and led by the former leader of RA, MACTEP. SDG and RUSSO had been focused largely on fighting in the drone regions, while the rest of RA cared little about it; there was some drama, and those two corps split. Relations between RA and SF remain friendly (SF still uses the RA killboard, for example).
Solar Fleet made a lot of waves by allying with Intrepid Crossing and Ethereal Dawn while they were fighting Red Alliance and many of the smaller members of the Northern Coalition. Solar Fleet's involvement caused Red Alliance and Majesta Empire to pull out of the war to avoid conflict with Solar Fleet. Solar Fleet likely did this to ensure that they had allies in the Drone Regions in the event that the NC invades the Drone Regions.
Compounding the awkwardness, Solar Fleet has apparently allied with AAA, KenZoku, and Triumvirate while attempting to seize control of Geminate away from Wildly Inappropriate. Since WI is a member of the Northern Coalition, this put them at war with TCF, RAZOR, and many other alliances also blue to us. As of August 2009 they are still fighting NC and have skirmished in southern Geminate and northern Cobalt Edge close to Tenal. |

Lord Zim
1019
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 13:44:00 -
[423] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Andrey Wartooth wrote:
Edit: Blap titans were almost as game breaking as remote Doomsdays. Perhaps moreso.
Atleast they were getting fixed, ring mining gets introduced in winterpatch prolly november thats alot of tech isk to be bottled up untill that time If only CCP would hurry up and fix tech so we could place bets on what people like you would whine about next. |

baltec1
Bat Country
1628
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 13:56:00 -
[424] - Quote
JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:baltec1 wrote:forestwho wrote:Like i said, i can pull out numbers out my ass aswel, im not saying they are right, im just saying his numbers were more wrong than mine  This is different to the NC and its colossal income how? LOL NC died due to botted and rmted supercarriers that were buffed prior to invasion. So no NC did't die because grunts mobilized and because of "effort"
NC lost because their vast numbers failed to turn up to fights. The supers just speeded up the implosion. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
651
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:01:00 -
[425] - Quote
NC had more supers than the DRF at first. Furthermore, both sides had equal time to build more after the changes, and the war started long after said changes.
TL;DR your theory is **** |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
651
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:03:00 -
[426] - Quote
Oh ya, and Raiden and co were already beat before the titan tracking nerf...which actually wasn't that huge of a nerf anyway, the big difference being that they can't clear bubblers off of each other anymore. Titans can still ownzone battleships and are a huge boost to fleets.
TL;DR your theory is doubly **** |

Rellik B00n
Lethal Death Squad
148
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:15:00 -
[427] - Quote
Spurty wrote: Not sure why everyone wants to fight over null sec ... People camping Jita undock / gates are ahead of the curve with regards to effort / risk / reward
shhh, dont tell everyone ffs. qfmjt-1 |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:20:00 -
[428] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Andrey Wartooth wrote:
Edit: Blap titans were almost as game breaking as remote Doomsdays. Perhaps moreso.
Atleast they were getting fixed, ring mining gets introduced in winterpatch prolly november thats alot of tech isk to be bottled up untill that time If only CCP would hurry up and fix tech so we could place bets on what people like you would whine about next. My bets are on members of Goonswarm exploiting a bug in the game for profit again, while all the Goon forum posters claim it was not really an exploit or Goonswarm election rigging or Goonswarm embarrassing this game internationally via online gaming magazines or a Goonswarm member complaining, CCP threw him/her under a bus.
I could go on but there seems to be a pattern emerging. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

March rabbit
R.I.P. Legion Red Alliance
213
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:21:00 -
[429] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Andrey Wartooth wrote:Onictus wrote:http://soundcloud.com/sindel-pellion/titan
LOL who sang it so I can, throw them some isk. That was hilarios. I'm guessing Sindel Pellion of TEST. I'm glad you are taking losing all your space so well. Why so serious? I'm just a hired gun, on my end, all I need is a target, an FC, and maybe a Titan pilot to get me there and I'm happy, if I'm in SOV space or NPC means no nevermind to me. I didn't move to null to build outposts and fuel POS's. i guess those guys are happy that their leader will have more systems to lend and put bots into. Nice to see so big adherence  Maybe they even support their RL governments   |

Twulf
The Konvergent League Sev3rance
90
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:45:00 -
[430] - Quote
Xython wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Xython wrote:Spurty wrote: Not sure why everyone wants to fight over null sec ... People camping Jita undock / gates are ahead of the curve with regards to effort / risk / reward
Holding tech doesn't affect them. Only concern they have is that Jita doesn't get it's trillions of ISK brought in / out every few hours
Also, I think you're vastly mistaken re: Tech profits. If you got 7000 players together and had them doing something in highsec, like say, mission running, or Ice botting, or crafting ships or something, you'd see similar profits. Tech is just what Goons "do" right now, because of a lucky happenstance with Goon space and moon goo. T The difference is there are not 7000 people mining moon goo. I don't how many people exactly you have tending to POS but I am sure it's just a small handful. A handful of people making the same amount of isk (almost completely passively may I add) as 7000 people actively running missions or mining ice. Sure, a small handful of people tending to POS... and an army of people offering required logistics support to ensure that handful of people can actually DO the moon mining in the first place. Don't try the false comparison bullshit there, it won't work. It's not 5 guys and a single spreadsheet leading to a trillion ISK a month in tech profits; it's the work of thousands of people in the Swarm working together. Nullsec isn't Highsec, we have no CONCORD to hold our hands and wipe our... noses for us. If you want to start making real money in EVE, it's time to take off the training wheels and move out of Highsec. And CCP needs to get off their asses and move MORE money out of Highsec, because the Risk/Reward is so screwed up it's not even funny.
Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
144
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:48:00 -
[431] - Quote
Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons.
you say that as if all of the tech moons in the game were specifically given to the goons by some benevolent higher being. |

Degren
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1812
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:50:00 -
[432] - Quote
forestwho wrote:[quote=Degren]The best part of the thread are the 11 upvotes to the OP.
Someone agrees with you, keep posting!
Maybe you can dethrone them together! Stop trolling or i report it and just simply get your posts removed.
I was being deadly serious, sir. What is stopping you?
PS: I wish we got notices when people quoted our posts. Such comedy gold
Better consult the chart. |

Twulf
The Konvergent League Sev3rance
90
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 16:13:00 -
[433] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. you say that as if all of the tech moons in the game were specifically given to the goons by some benevolent higher being.
You act as if Goons had any risk when they took the moons, they zerg and scammed their way to the tech moons. They have numbers and numbers win in EvE. |

Degren
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1814
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 16:14:00 -
[434] - Quote
Twulf wrote:They have numbers and numbers win in EvE.
Make friends, boss. Better consult the chart. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
147
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 16:16:00 -
[435] - Quote
Twulf wrote:Dave stark wrote:Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. you say that as if all of the tech moons in the game were specifically given to the goons by some benevolent higher being. You act as if Goons had any risk when they took the moons, they zerg and scammed their way to the tech moons. They have numbers and numbers win in EvE.
quoting a nice shade of green. |

baltec1
Bat Country
1629
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 16:19:00 -
[436] - Quote
Twulf wrote:Dave stark wrote:Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. you say that as if all of the tech moons in the game were specifically given to the goons by some benevolent higher being. You act as if Goons had any risk when they took the moons, they zerg and scammed their way to the tech moons. They have numbers and numbers win in EvE.
Tell that to BFF NC. |

Ping Pang Pong
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 18:22:00 -
[437] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:forestwho wrote:Andrey Wartooth wrote:
Edit: Blap titans were almost as game breaking as remote Doomsdays. Perhaps moreso.
Atleast they were getting fixed, ring mining gets introduced in winterpatch prolly november thats alot of tech isk to be bottled up untill that time If only CCP would hurry up and fix tech so we could place bets on what people like you would whine about next.
Fixing tech won't do anything to immediately effect the way things are. You guys have been bathing in moon goo for what, 3 years now? Pulling in something like 15 billion a month per moon over three years means your coffers are good and padded. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1009
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 19:13:00 -
[438] - Quote
Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons.
What's that? Why yes, we are better at EVE than you, thank you for noticing. :)
|

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1009
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 19:14:00 -
[439] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:Lord Zim wrote: If only CCP would hurry up and fix tech so we could place bets on what people like you would whine about next.
Fixing tech won't do anything to immediately effect the way things are. You guys have been bathing in moon goo for what, 3 years now? Pulling in something like 15 billion a month per moon over three years means your coffers are good and padded.
Er, 1 trillion a month. That's 1000 billion, for those of you who can't count. Padded is not the word.
And that's only Tech, that's not counting our other industrial interests, as well as the market manipulation games we do all the time to make isk et all. Tech profits allow for some really rad ways of investing isk to make more isk, after all. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 19:16:00 -
[440] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:
I would say that falls in the line of the Goons being given just about everything they have.
I would say this falls in line with you not knowing what you are talking about, noted NPC forums poster Fing Fang Foom. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 19:17:00 -
[441] - Quote
Xython wrote:Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. What's that? Why yes, we are better at EVE than you, thank you for noticing. :)
Having friends in this social game owns, doesn't it? I think a lot of the posters in this thread could use some friends, because clearly they haven't got any. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1009
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 19:42:00 -
[442] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:Xython wrote:Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. What's that? Why yes, we are better at EVE than you, thank you for noticing. :) Having friends in this social game owns, doesn't it? I think a lot of the posters in this thread could use some friends, because clearly they haven't got any.
I'm torn. I love to solo rat, and solo **** in other MMOs. So I "get" the whole "**** friends" thing. At the same time, you can't beat having 7000 friends at your back if **** hits the fan.
I just wish EVE had group PVE content. Don't bother saying "Incursions" -- they were destroyed in that patch and are worthless. |

Jonah Gravenstein
601
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 19:54:00 -
[443] - Quote
Xython wrote: I just wish EVE had group PVE content. Don't bother saying "Incursions" -- they were destroyed in that patch and are worthless.
c5 & c6 + cap escalations are an absolute isk farm if you do them right, and the PvP is free if it's in someone elses wormhole. War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Lord Zim
1021
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:00:00 -
[444] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:You guys have been bathing in moon goo for what, 3 years now? Pulling in something like 15 billion a month per moon over three years means your coffers are good and padded. Given the fact we dissolved barely over 2 years ago, and TCF dissolved less than 1.5 years ago, I'm going to go with "you're wrong".
Ping Pang Pong wrote:The Goons were given half of their tech moons by an alliance that moved out of the system/dissolved. The remainder of the moons were taken after CCP decided to nerf tracking on super caps out of the blue, and goons blobbed everything with sub-caps.
I would say that falls in the line of the Goons being given just about everything they have. We took most of our tech before titan tracking was tweaked. So again, I'm going to go with "you're wrong".
Hope that helps. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1009
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:08:00 -
[445] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Xython wrote: I just wish EVE had group PVE content. Don't bother saying "Incursions" -- they were destroyed in that patch and are worthless.
c5 & c6 + cap escalations are an absolute isk farm if you do them right, and the PvP is free if it's in someone elses wormhole.
Ya know, that's one thing I never have gotten into at all -- Wormhole stuff. Might be fun to look into it. |

Garreth Vlox
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:17:00 -
[446] - Quote
MotherMoon wrote:Only question i have is why cant a stage an attack on undefended moons to raid them of goo. Does it magically transport the huge distance between moon and pos? If small gangs could blow up the ships transporting the goo to the safe pos, gangs of 5-10 players could make an impact raiding supply lines.
Small defense fleets would form to catch them.
Small gang warfare could come back to null sec.
Also if your an allaince with so many systems that 70% of them are empty most of the time, you deserve to have your passive income stolen by brave pilots. It would promote smaller sov space. Come on its perfect !
I've marked the important part, if you think that is how it would work you have never been in null sec. You **** with a moon that makes an alliance as much isk a month as a tech moon does and you will get blobbed. No self respecting alliance is going to tolerate you poking their money supply line.
ALSO:
This is just another way to try and circumvent actually taking the moon, here's a thought, how about instead of trying to scheme CCP on the forums into adding a game mechanic that allows you to attack a POS without actually attacking, you just go find some people fleet up and shoot the ******* thing. And as far as the you're a big alliance and you leave systems empty so I should be allowed to steal from you, try that in real life and see how long it takes some one to try and shoot you for stealing **** out of their back yard. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1178
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:17:00 -
[447] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Ping Pang Pong wrote:You guys have been bathing in moon goo for what, 3 years now? Pulling in something like 15 billion a month per moon over three years means your coffers are good and padded. Given the fact we dissolved barely over 2 years ago, and TCF dissolved less than 1.5 years ago, I'm going to go with "you're wrong". Ping Pang Pong wrote:The Goons were given half of their tech moons by an alliance that moved out of the system/dissolved. The remainder of the moons were taken after CCP decided to nerf tracking on super caps out of the blue, and goons blobbed everything with sub-caps.
I would say that falls in the line of the Goons being given just about everything they have. We took most of our tech before titan tracking was tweaked. So again, I'm going to go with "you're wrong". Hope that helps. Besides all the tech money goes back out as reimbursements, so the people that get blown up are who benefit. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:35:00 -
[448] - Quote
Twulf wrote:Dave stark wrote:Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. you say that as if all of the tech moons in the game were specifically given to the goons by some benevolent higher being. You act as if Goons had any risk when they took the moons, they zerg and scammed their way to the tech moons. They have numbers and numbers win in EvE.
How does one scam someone out of a tech moon? I don't think even we've managed that. |

Jonah Gravenstein
601
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:37:00 -
[449] - Quote
Xython wrote: Ya know, that's one thing I never have gotten into at all -- Wormhole stuff. Might be fun to look into it.
3 things to remember, wormholes are like gates with mass limits and a lifetime either of which will close it, always have probe launchers fitted to at least 50% of your fleet and bookmarks, bookmark everything especially your exit. War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1178
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:38:00 -
[450] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:Twulf wrote:Dave stark wrote:Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. you say that as if all of the tech moons in the game were specifically given to the goons by some benevolent higher being. You act as if Goons had any risk when they took the moons, they zerg and scammed their way to the tech moons. They have numbers and numbers win in EvE. How does one scam someone out of a tech moon? I don't think even we've managed that. Nope.
Apparently we have ! Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Cameron Cahill
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:38:00 -
[451] - Quote
Ping Pang Pong wrote:Lord Zim wrote: If only CCP would hurry up and fix tech so we could place bets on what people like you would whine about next.
Fixing tech won't do anything to immediately effect the way things are. You guys have been bathing in moon goo for what, 3 years now? Pulling in something like 15 billion a month per moon over three years means your coffers are good and padded. Twulf wrote:Dave stark wrote:Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. you say that as if all of the tech moons in the game were specifically given to the goons by some benevolent higher being. You act as if Goons had any risk when they took the moons, they zerg and scammed their way to the tech moons. They have numbers and numbers win in EvE. The Goons were given half of their tech moons by an alliance that moved out of the system/dissolved. The remainder of the moons were taken after CCP decided to nerf tracking on super caps out of the blue, and goons blobbed everything with sub-caps. I would say that falls in the line of the Goons being given just about everything they have.
Again what about fade, pure blind, fountain, cloud ring, branch, tenal and now delve? Who gave us those?
|

Max50
Parental Control
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:39:00 -
[452] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:Max50 wrote:I think people are missing the point when it comes to think of changes from CCP.
CCP will make changes to keep the game running,this doesnt mean that it will actually make the game better for all players.
Anyone remembers the days of NC?How loved they were together...brofist etc?The one day supers got boosted and suddenly the ruskies that had lots of them pull the numbers in subcaps and ofc outnumbered NC's supercaps.NC fell,propably because of the combination of doing over and over the same thing(defending long boring gaming hours etc over and over) and because a few game changes gave the edge to someone else. Time passes and the game gets static again.Goons try...whatever they try but they get stomped over and over in a boring wall of supercarriers,virtually invicible if you didnt had more supercaps.Then the first supercap rebalancing(nerf for onwers like me,fair balancing for the rest) but again that wasnt enough since the blap titans appeared. Blap titans made it possible for a single alliance like raiden to defend succesfully against a coalition of alliances.The game became static again since CFC couldnt stand getting blapped on a daily and boring basis so a next new thing should come to change this.So now we have the new "rebalanced" titans.
Although i participated in opposite side of goons,i cannot say that the game isnt changed for good.
Players have 3-4 options:
1)either join the "winning side"
2)start crying more than goons did about everything 3)get organised
4)adapt.
Crying about it isnt an option.Like any mmorpg,EVE has to give the players the carrot to keep the rabbits running behind it.Thats how this game works.CCP chose tech to keep a big part of its memberbase running behind something they think is important. But the fact is that it isnt important if you dont let it be.Adapt or die i guess.
I use to make ISK by doing lvl4 missions in empire and later ratting plexing in -1.0 systems.I thought that i knew my **** untill i tried lvl5 missions.Doing them propably not only gives more ISK,it gives you a ISK you dont know what to do so you just stop farming.I am not doing wallet show off here,since i am certain some other guy will tell me that he is better than me and makes even more by ...lets say trading. Always adapt,always look for some new for ISK making,for manufacturing or for PVPing.Its what makes the game interesting.
CFC will die in the future,just like BOB died,just like the ruskie coalition died,just like NC died after so many wars etc etc.
Death of powerblocks is what keeps this game ticking.The problem is what you or me g The CFC may die like BoB did, maybe, at some far point in the future. But so far Goonswarm has been destroyed a few times and each time we come back far stronger than before. Edit: Blap titans were almost as game breaking as remote Doomsdays. Perhaps moreso.
Its not a question of "if" but a question of "when".I am not roleplaying the usual anti-CFC here but its just the normal circle of power as demonstrated all these years in EVE.The reasons can be many but irrelevant to the stance a player or a group of players should keep. Adaptation is the only solution when game mechanics dont favour what a player does.Crying doesnt help.
So the problem with the CFC tech now isnt that they control almost all of it because they were flying maels+drakes+canes+support for these before they get any tech moon and they still fly the same ships.Yes they might build supers now but they already had supers before the tech. If someone wants to actually beat CFC he needs to overcome some simple difficulties that have nothing to do with "unfair" gameplay.They first need to find 1500 actual players,half in EU tz and half in US tz,then they need to motivate them to form up a blob in a daily basis and go out for a huge grind. As much "cool" as it seems for new players to actually do the grind,if you ask me or thousand other players to go grind a POS i will simply log off,because i am bored and because i have adapted so i dont need to grind anything.
In that sense exactly,i dont agree with the opinion that says RDN lost before the titan nerf.1 alliance,practically less than 200 players held the field numerous times using the most expensive ships in game(tengus,abbadons,supercarriers and titans) as long as they believed it fit them.Once another change was on the way they simply decided to adapt.
P.S 1:blap titans were "game breaking" for the CFC side,but "blob balancing" from the other side.I thought we left roleplaying for CAOD. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1178
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:07:00 -
[453] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:Again what about fade, pure blind, fountain, cloud ring, branch, tenal and now delve? Who gave us those?
-A- didn't want their friends to have those regions, they gave them to us.
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:14:00 -
[454] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:Your flawed argument is like calling the owner of a small grocery store stupid for not being more competitive and letting Walmart put him out of business.
Tesco is something like the world's third biggest retailer. It started as a single stall in a market. Care to throw another bad analogy out? |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1178
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:25:00 -
[455] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:Your flawed argument is like calling the owner of a small grocery store stupid for not being more competitive and letting Walmart put him out of business. Tesco is something like the world's third biggest retailer. It started as a single stall in a market. Care to throw another bad analogy out? It's like rifters attacking a cyno ship when remote doomsdays existed. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Lord Zim
1021
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:29:00 -
[456] - Quote
Max50 wrote:Its not a question of "if" but a question of "when".I am not roleplaying the usual anti-CFC here but its just the normal circle of power as demonstrated all these years in EVE. This can't be emphasized enough, this will happen. Question is just when, and how spectacularly.
I'm hoping very. I mean, we have to top the SOV welp of early 2010.
Max50 wrote:In that sense exactly,i dont agree with the opinion that says RDN lost before the titan nerf.1 alliance,practically less than 200 players held the field numerous times using the most expensive ships in game(tengus,abbadons,supercarriers and titans) as long as they believed it fit them.Once another change was on the way they simply decided to adapt. I'm not 100% certain of all the details, mainly because I wasn't as involved in this war as I would've liked, but I thought we were mostly going "we're not invading" while rzr kept SBUing etc tenal, until we finally said "ok, that's enough, we're taking tenal", at which point RDN just slinked away.
Prior to that, RDN, NCdot and Ev0ke had been working together (with a smattering of PL whenever there was a chance of a super kill) to fairly good effect, but they were getting pretty close to matching our numbers, and then they had supers on the field in addition.
Max50 wrote:P.S 1:blap titans were "game breaking" for the CFC side,but "blob balancing" from the other side.I thought we left roleplaying for CAOD. Yes and no. At that point they were used to do "blob balancing", but that only works as long as only one side uses supers. The instant both sides start using them is the instant one (or both) sides start losing a lot of them, and if one side loses more than the other chances are their morale breaks, and this is the more game breaking aspect of supers (it still is, even after rebalancing). There are tons of counters to them, but the main problem is their effect on morale, both when just one side uses them, and when one side loses a lot of them. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1178
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:34:00 -
[457] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:I'm not 100% certain of all the details, mainly because I wasn't as involved in this war as I would've liked, but I thought we were mostly going "we're not invading" while rzr kept SBUing etc tenal, until we finally said "ok, that's enough, we're taking tenal", at which point RDN just slinked away. The cap fleets were shooting their structures for a while before. Two weeks to a month, and RZR was tiring of repping all their structures.
Lord Zim wrote:Yes and no. At that point they were used to do "blob balancing", but that only works as long as only one side uses supers. The instant both sides start using them is the instant one (or both) sides start losing a lot of them, and if one side loses more than the other chances are their morale breaks, and this is the more game breaking aspect of supers (it still is, even after rebalancing). There are tons of counters to them, but the main problem is their effect on morale, both when just one side uses them, and when one side loses a lot of them. Yep, and now we have blap titans helping to camp 310. Damn wierd.
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Twulf
The Konvergent League Sev3rance
91
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 22:19:00 -
[458] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:Twulf wrote:Dave stark wrote:Twulf wrote:Lol now I have seen it all. A Goon talking about risk/reward as if they have any idea what that means when they can zerk non stop and never run out of ISK because of tech moons. you say that as if all of the tech moons in the game were specifically given to the goons by some benevolent higher being. You act as if Goons had any risk when they took the moons, they zerg and scammed their way to the tech moons. They have numbers and numbers win in EvE. How does one scam someone out of a tech moon? I don't think even we've managed that.
Did you guys not scam you way to beating BOB or do I have wrong information?
Personally I don't really care. GOONs have earned everything they have. |

Lord Zim
1021
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 22:25:00 -
[459] - Quote
Twulf wrote:Did you guys not scam you way to beating BOB or do I have wrong information? There was no scam involved, one director just went **** BoB, just like our CEO went **** goons a year later. |

Vinni Starseeker
MMMMMA
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 03:58:00 -
[460] - Quote
Cameron Cahill wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:
Your flawed argument is like calling the owner of a small grocery store stupid for not being more competitive and letting Walmart put him out of business.
What you're saying here is that the US government (CCP) should shut down Walmart (GSF/CFC/OTEC) for being too big. Yeah thats not going to happen either. It will never change because there's no rule stopping anyone from becoming Walmart. GSF used to be the small grocery store and BOB was Walmart and what did the GSF do? We took over the galaxy and crushed BOB and its 3(so far) reiterations. If you can't do that then yes, it's no ones fault but your own.
Learn your history For the analogy use AT&T rather than Walmart. AT&T was split up by the U.S. Government for running a monopoly. If corporations get so big in EVE that they significantly reduce the game play experiance then CCP is within their right to change the rules.
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
370
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 04:00:00 -
[461] - Quote
Vinni Starseeker wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:
Your flawed argument is like calling the owner of a small grocery store stupid for not being more competitive and letting Walmart put him out of business.
What you're saying here is that the US government (CCP) should shut down Walmart (GSF/CFC/OTEC) for being too big. Yeah thats not going to happen either. It will never change because there's no rule stopping anyone from becoming Walmart. GSF used to be the small grocery store and BOB was Walmart and what did the GSF do? We took over the galaxy and crushed BOB and its 3(so far) reiterations. If you can't do that then yes, it's no ones fault but your own. Learn your history For the analogy use AT&T rather than Walmart. AT&T was split up by the U.S. Government for running a monopoly. If corporations get so big in EVE that they significantly reduce the game play experiance then CCP is within their right to change the rules.
Learn your history, AT&T (well, Bell, really) had a Monopoly on its business that could not be shaken because of legal restrictions against putting up new phone lines. And decades of direct subsidy.
Goonswarm has no such special advantages. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
191
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 06:01:00 -
[462] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:
Learn your history, AT&T (well, Bell, really) had a Monopoly on its business that could not be shaken because of legal restrictions against putting up new phone lines. And decades of direct subsidy.
Goonswarm has no such special advantages.
Yeah they have others.... friends.......
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Lord Zim
1022
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 06:12:00 -
[463] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:
Learn your history, AT&T (well, Bell, really) had a Monopoly on its business that could not be shaken because of legal restrictions against putting up new phone lines. And decades of direct subsidy.
Goonswarm has no such special advantages.
Yeah they have others.... friends....... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvdf5n-zI14 |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.13 00:14:00 -
[464] - Quote
kinda derailing here... wtb instant tech fix |

Yeshulomolka McBitchtits
Grand Lodge of Nothingness
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.13 01:34:00 -
[465] - Quote
forestwho wrote: Giving those alliances a better moral and a better pubic image due more isk
forestwho wrote: a better pubic image due more isk
forestwho wrote: a better pubic image
forestwho wrote: pubic image
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
379
|
Posted - 2012.07.13 01:36:00 -
[466] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:
Learn your history, AT&T (well, Bell, really) had a Monopoly on its business that could not be shaken because of legal restrictions against putting up new phone lines. And decades of direct subsidy.
Goonswarm has no such special advantages.
Yeah they have others.... friends....... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvdf5n-zI14
Actually, I think the relationships Goons form among themselves and with other alliances are the only unfair advantage they have.
Friendship is not only magic, it's OP. I don't get why other alliances aren't hopping on the Friendship Exploit train. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
874
|
Posted - 2012.07.13 09:34:00 -
[467] - Quote
I wish I had some friends. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Dave stark
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
162
|
Posted - 2012.07.13 09:37:00 -
[468] - Quote
forestwho wrote:kinda derailing here... wtb instant tech fix indeed, i'm curious as to the next excuse people will be using. the tech excuse is getting old. |

Lord Zim
1022
|
Posted - 2012.07.13 09:43:00 -
[469] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:kinda derailing here... wtb instant tech fix indeed, i'm curious as to the next excuse people will be using. the tech excuse is getting old. Don't worry, we'll be back in "you're just the NC" in a week. |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
30
|
Posted - 2012.07.14 08:36:00 -
[470] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:kinda derailing here... wtb instant tech fix indeed, i'm curious as to the next excuse people will be using. the tech excuse is getting old.
next excuse is devfleet ofc... kinda obvius |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.14 08:47:00 -
[471] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:kinda derailing here... wtb instant tech fix indeed, i'm curious as to the next excuse people will be using. the tech excuse is getting old. next excuse is devfleet ofc... kinda obvius
Got any evidence to back up your Rumor attacking CCP and its Staff? -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

forestwho
Foonfleet Investment Banking
30
|
Posted - 2012.07.14 08:53:00 -
[472] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:forestwho wrote:Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:kinda derailing here... wtb instant tech fix indeed, i'm curious as to the next excuse people will be using. the tech excuse is getting old. next excuse is devfleet ofc... kinda obvius Got any evidence to back up your Rumor attacking CCP and its Staff?
only indirect stuff... its kinda weird it took them 4 days to fix bomb and missile damage in this announced big delve war were they were used quet heavly.... affecting tengus and bombers.. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
591
|
Posted - 2012.07.14 09:12:00 -
[473] - Quote
Clearly CCP should have remained impartial by allowing SoCo to carry on exploiting the bomb damage bug. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
401
|
Posted - 2012.07.14 10:18:00 -
[474] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:forestwho wrote:Dave stark wrote:forestwho wrote:kinda derailing here... wtb instant tech fix indeed, i'm curious as to the next excuse people will be using. the tech excuse is getting old. next excuse is devfleet ofc... kinda obvius Got any evidence to back up your Rumor attacking CCP and its Staff? only indirect stuff... its kinda weird it took them 4 days to fix bomb and missile damage in this announced big delve war were they were used quet heavly.... affecting tengus and bombers..
They Broke something (massively), fixed it in a timely manner, and you're claiming conspiracy?
Had they not fixed it, DelveJam would have started Bombing Super Fleets. They already demonstrated the ability to put enough bombers in a fleet for poops and giggles to kill an Archon. Imagine the turnout of Bombers for a potential Super kill, or any other Super Serial Business. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Lord Zim
1025
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 21:17:00 -
[475] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:They Broke something (massively), fixed it in a timely manner, and you're claiming conspiracy?
Had they not fixed it, DelveJam would have started Bombing Super Fleets. They already demonstrated the ability to put enough bombers in a fleet for poops and giggles to kill an Archon. Imagine the turnout of Bombers for a potential Super kill, or any other Super Serial Business. You really need to stop letting facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
427
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 23:37:00 -
[476] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:They Broke something (massively), fixed it in a timely manner, and you're claiming conspiracy?
Had they not fixed it, DelveJam would have started Bombing Super Fleets. They already demonstrated the ability to put enough bombers in a fleet for poops and giggles to kill an Archon. Imagine the turnout of Bombers for a potential Super kill, or any other Super Serial Business. You really need to stop letting facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
That's what the Apollo truthers keep telling me when I show them LRO photos.
I guess I'm just bad at conspiracy theories. -RubyPorto
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Jayrendo Karr
Suns Of Korhal Terran Commonwealth
187
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 23:59:00 -
[477] - Quote
Guerrilla warfare, attack their **** then leave before a response fleet arrives. You may not have supers but a well organized/timed/armed strike with smaller guns can do significant damage. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: [one page] |