| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Davion Falcon
Those Once Loyal Ushra'Khan
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.14 20:10:00 -
[361] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Prozacxx wrote:NightmareX wrote:Diesel47 wrote:Why did u disable the like and dislike buttons on youtube?
Afraid of people to give their opinion on ur video?
lol. Because it doesn't have any meaning on how peoples likes the video. Just because of some angry 0.0 space fanbois'es doesn't like the video, it doesn't mean the the rest of the EVE wont like it. Everyone is free to give their opinions on my video on the comment section as long as they are biting on my troll movie http://i.chzbgr.com/completestore/2009/7/12/128918977693479635.jpg
A sufficiently advanced troll is indistinguishable from a genuine ******. Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. Never forgotten, never forgiven. |

Khanh'rhh
1621
|
Posted - 2012.07.14 21:23:00 -
[362] - Quote
"The DunningGÇôKruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes"
This is basically OP.
I hope he's trolling because it takes a whole lot of stupid to claim what he is claiming seriously.
And that is me done with the thread, OP will never ever see that he's stupid no matter how many times people point it out.
I actually pity him.
Anyone who disagrees is a "0.0 fanboi" which is hilarious seeing as most of the people telling him he's bad have done or are currently doing highsec PVP.
That he can non-ironically say he brings one neutral Guardian per DPS ship and still claims there are more risks than in lowsec/nullsec is probably the most hilariously sad thing I have ever seen. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.14 22:38:00 -
[363] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:"The DunningGÇôKruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes"
This is basically OP.
I hope he's trolling because it takes a whole lot of stupid to claim what he is claiming seriously.
And that is me done with the thread, OP will never ever see that he's stupid no matter how many times people point it out.
I actually pity him.
Anyone who disagrees is a "0.0 fanboi" which is hilarious seeing as most of the people telling him he's bad have done or are currently doing highsec PVP.
That he can non-ironically say he brings one neutral Guardian per DPS ship and still claims there are more risks than in lowsec/nullsec is probably the most hilariously sad thing I have ever seen.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1622674#post1622674
Care to give me any counter arguments to that?
Or are you just gonna continue to do a fap fap over you fanboyism over 0.0 space?
You clearly knows i'm damn right about what i'm saying there. |

Khanh'rhh
1622
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 00:00:00 -
[364] - Quote
I already ridiculed that post, in which you claim gaining intel in 0.0 is easier than in highsec, which is just flat out terribly bad.
I will make this hilariously easy for you:
WH - anything is permissible, no local channel 0.0 - anything is permissible LS - no AOE weapons or interdiction. Titans cannot doomsday. Gate guns for illegal aggression HS - no AOE weapons or interdiction. No cynos. Only valid targets without CONCORD interaction are wartargets.
That is basically how it breaks down through space types.
So, whenever you list a risk in highsec, it is *also present in every other space type* -- on top of the ones you mention you get all the risks that come with lower sec.
Most crucially, if you wardec someone then only the wartargets can get involved. If you dec a 20man corp and 5 are online, then the expected fleet size that can shoot you is 5 and the maximum is 20.
In no other space type can you say this for certain. It allows you to perfectly plan your engagement and there should be no way you can lose ships.
This shows in your video where you abandon the Vindicator when you enter lowsec, since you ******* know there's more risk to it there. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 00:22:00 -
[365] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:I already ridiculed that post, in which you claim gaining intel in 0.0 is easier than in highsec, which is just flat out terribly bad.
I will make this hilariously easy for you:
WH - anything is permissible, no local channel 0.0 - anything is permissible LS - no AOE weapons or interdiction. Titans cannot doomsday. Gate guns for illegal aggression HS - no AOE weapons or interdiction. No cynos. Only valid targets without CONCORD interaction are wartargets.
That is basically how it breaks down through space types.
So, whenever you list a risk in highsec, it is *also present in every other space type* -- on top of the ones you mention you get all the risks that come with lower sec.
Most crucially, if you wardec someone then only the wartargets can get involved. If you dec a 20man corp and 5 are online, then the expected fleet size that can shoot you is 5 and the maximum is 20.
In no other space type can you say this for certain. It allows you to perfectly plan your engagement and there should be no way you can lose ships.
This shows in your video where you abandon the Vindicator when you enter lowsec, since you ******* know there's more risk to it there.
Nope, my plan was to use the Megathron to begin with. I had to get some Megathron footages. I asked about the Vindicator though, but i was told to hold on with it to begin with.
And as you did see, that contract in low sec didn't last for long. So i didn't even get the time to move the Vindi anywhere.
And what you say about WH, 0.0, LS and HS is not enough to measure how the different places are when it comes to risk. Scouting and spying is also a big part of a war. And before you can get the right information about the war targets / enemies, then you have to find out how many they have in their fleet and what kind of ships they have ready to fight us with.
You can scan out ships in WH, 0.0, and low sec. This is extremely hard to do in crowded systems in empire because random ships are all over places.
And before you can call something for risk free, then we first of all have to know exactly how many ships and what ships our enemies / war targets have when we start a fight. But like i have said, it's impossible to know the exact numbers they have and what ships they have simply because it's impossible to scan for war targets without getting other ***** on our scans. So we don't know what kind of ships that actually is a war target after a scan is done.
In a 0.0 space or WH space, it's rather easy to get that info. Because when you are in a random 0.0 space where 80% or more are only war targets, then it's much easier to find out where in space they are and what ships they have. It's the same in a WH system, because you enter a WH system to kill those who are in that WH system. So when some of your friends have found their fleet there, then you guys jumps into the WH system and start the fight where you already know what you will meet.
Because of that, it's actually more risks by doing PVP in crowded systems in empire because it's pretty much impossible to know exactly what they have against us and how many they are.
You should come to empire and do PVP your self to see this. It's quite scary sometimes because you never know when they have 20-30 Battleships ready in a crowded system to attack our 5 man Battleship fleet just to take an example.
Can you explain to me why this is NOT risky? |

Ohh Yeah
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
139
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 00:59:00 -
[366] - Quote
nightmarex will end this thread by claiming that he's trolling
and even if he is, nobody will believe him and still perceive him as an idiot |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 01:12:00 -
[367] - Quote
Ohh Yeah wrote:nightmarex will end this thread by claiming that he's trolling
and even if he is, nobody will believe him and still perceive him as an idiot
Hi PL.
Y U SO MAD? |

Cambarus
The Baros Syndicate
210
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 01:47:00 -
[368] - Quote
You should probably put less effort into editing your vids m8, then people will just ignore it instead of dragging you into a 20 page flame war where everyone except you thinks you're awful.  |

Jimmy Razor
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 01:56:00 -
[369] - Quote
This is one of the worst EVE-related videos I have ever seen.
Jesus christ. |

SNSD Tiffany
RAM Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:03:00 -
[370] - Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect |

Davion Falcon
Those Once Loyal Ushra'Khan
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:09:00 -
[371] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:
Herp a derp.
Can you explain to me why this is NOT risky?
It's been done multiple times throughout this glorious spergefest. Reasons that have made sense to everyone but you. Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. Never forgotten, never forgiven. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:11:00 -
[372] - Quote
Cambarus wrote:You should probably put less effort into editing your vids m8, then people will just ignore it instead of dragging you into a 20 page flame war where everyone except you thinks you're awful. 
Nah, everyone are just butthurt and angry and just want to troll me because i just proved myself to be better at both PVP and movie making than them.
And just because it's me that are posting the video and topic. If this movie had been posted by anyone else, then this topic wouldn't even be 4 pages long yet.
So, there you have it. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:13:00 -
[373] - Quote
Davion Falcon wrote:NightmareX wrote:
Herp a derp.
Can you explain to me why this is NOT risky?
It's been done multiple times throughout this glorious spergefest. Reasons that have made sense to everyone but you.
I still find it funny that you think it's no risk on what i explained. If that's the case, then your to dumb to understand empire.
|

Richard Stallmanu Stallmania
Exanthesis
19
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:23:00 -
[374] - Quote
This was the worst Eve pvp video I have seen since ReMined 4 by NightminerX, member of God-Awful Squad. Wait, this is the same video. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:29:00 -
[375] - Quote
Richard Stallmanu Stallmania wrote:This was the worst Eve pvp video I have seen since ReMined 4 by NightminerX, member of God-Awful Squad. Wait, this is the same video.
http://www.forumspile.com/BooHoo-FatBastard.jpg
|

sondre
The Athiest Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:34:00 -
[376] - Quote
Nightmare
No wonder you're a virgin, Nightmarex. |

Davion Falcon
Those Once Loyal Ushra'Khan
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:35:00 -
[377] - Quote
You fooled me once. I thought you were genuinely serious about this whole highsec pvp thing is "pro", and had so many unknown variables that are impossible to account for and thus, "risky" and require "balls of steel" to pull off.
But now I see you for the magnificent troll you are. There's no way anyone could possibly believe the above is true of eve highsec pvp. I tip my hat to you good sir, I shall rise no more to your bait. Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. Never forgotten, never forgiven. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:38:00 -
[378] - Quote
sondre wrote:NightmareNo wonder you're a virgin, Nightmarex.
Heh, that picture is like 4 years old now. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:40:00 -
[379] - Quote
Davion Falcon wrote:You fooled me once. I thought you were genuinely serious about this whole highsec pvp thing is "pro", and had so many unknown variables that are impossible to account for and thus, "risky" and require "balls of steel" to pull off.
But now I see you for the magnificent troll you are. There's no way anyone could possibly believe the above is true of eve highsec pvp. I tip my hat to you good sir, I shall rise no more to your bait.
You would never have the balls to put a Paladin (that almost died) up against 2x Vindicators, or ever PVP in a Vindicator at all. The only thing you would have the balls to do is to sit in a massive 150 man blob with 50 carriers.
You alliance name says all about you.
|

Davion Falcon
Those Once Loyal Ushra'Khan
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:53:00 -
[380] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Davion Falcon wrote:You fooled me once. I thought you were genuinely serious about this whole highsec pvp thing is "pro", and had so many unknown variables that are impossible to account for and thus, "risky" and require "balls of steel" to pull off.
But now I see you for the magnificent troll you are. There's no way anyone could possibly believe the above is true of eve highsec pvp. I tip my hat to you good sir, I shall rise no more to your bait. You would never have the balls to put a Paladin (that almost died) up against 2x Vindicators, or ever PVP in a Vindicator at all. The only thing you would have the balls to do is to sit in a massive 100 man blob with 25 carriers. You alliance name says all about you. EDIT: I find it very funny that alot of you here comes here and goes totally bawwww, you have no risks bla bla bla, while you forget what you are doing your self in 0.0 space and what alliance you are in. Think about that for a second before you post.
Ushra'Khan is in nullsec? When did this happen? Did CCP suddenly change the sec status of Kourmonen and Auga the last couple hours? Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. Never forgotten, never forgiven. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 02:56:00 -
[381] - Quote
Davion Falcon wrote:NightmareX wrote:Davion Falcon wrote:You fooled me once. I thought you were genuinely serious about this whole highsec pvp thing is "pro", and had so many unknown variables that are impossible to account for and thus, "risky" and require "balls of steel" to pull off.
But now I see you for the magnificent troll you are. There's no way anyone could possibly believe the above is true of eve highsec pvp. I tip my hat to you good sir, I shall rise no more to your bait. You would never have the balls to put a Paladin (that almost died) up against 2x Vindicators, or ever PVP in a Vindicator at all. The only thing you would have the balls to do is to sit in a massive 100 man blob with 25 carriers. You alliance name says all about you. EDIT: I find it very funny that alot of you here comes here and goes totally bawwww, you have no risks bla bla bla, while you forget what you are doing your self in 0.0 space and what alliance you are in. Think about that for a second before you post. Ushra'Khan is in nullsec? When did this happen? Did CCP suddenly change the sec status of Kourmonen and Auga the last couple hours?
It still doesn't change the fact that you still don't have the balls to use a Vindicator or a Paladin worth billions of isks in PVP.
EDIT: Hah, got the page 20 snipah  .
Now, my next goal is to reach page 50. |

Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
92
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 04:09:00 -
[382] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Davion Falcon wrote:NightmareX wrote:Davion Falcon wrote:You fooled me once. I thought you were genuinely serious about this whole highsec pvp thing is "pro", and had so many unknown variables that are impossible to account for and thus, "risky" and require "balls of steel" to pull off.
But now I see you for the magnificent troll you are. There's no way anyone could possibly believe the above is true of eve highsec pvp. I tip my hat to you good sir, I shall rise no more to your bait. You would never have the balls to put a Paladin (that almost died) up against 2x Vindicators, or ever PVP in a Vindicator at all. The only thing you would have the balls to do is to sit in a massive 100 man blob with 25 carriers. You alliance name says all about you. EDIT: I find it very funny that alot of you here comes here and goes totally bawwww, you have no risks bla bla bla, while you forget what you are doing your self in 0.0 space and what alliance you are in. Think about that for a second before you post. Ushra'Khan is in nullsec? When did this happen? Did CCP suddenly change the sec status of Kourmonen and Auga the last couple hours? It still doesn't change the fact that you still don't have the balls to use a Vindicator or a Paladin worth billions of isks in PVP. EDIT: Hah, got the page 20 snipah   . Now, my next goal is to reach page 50. http://kb.eveaquila.com/?a=kill_related&kll_id=22792
http://kb.vergeofcollapse.com/?a=kill_related&kll_id=5937
please don't bring your vindi up to scare people, warp that vindi into a bubble and fight there then talk to us about the risk of fighting in shiny ships.
about wh and 0.0, you have absolutely no clue about how things work there, pal.
in wh, there's this thing that everyone in 0.0 hates called cloak, which hide yourself from dscan, that + no local in wh makes it impossible to estimate the exact number of hostile fleet.
in 0.0, every single people in local that not in your fleet are hostile and they use cloak to approach you.
both place have this thing all carebears hate called bubble to get your shiny pod.
saying that using expensive pod in LS is pure ********
|

Davion Falcon
Those Once Loyal Ushra'Khan
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 04:10:00 -
[383] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Davion Falcon wrote:NightmareX wrote:Davion Falcon wrote:You fooled me once. I thought you were genuinely serious about this whole highsec pvp thing is "pro", and had so many unknown variables that are impossible to account for and thus, "risky" and require "balls of steel" to pull off.
But now I see you for the magnificent troll you are. There's no way anyone could possibly believe the above is true of eve highsec pvp. I tip my hat to you good sir, I shall rise no more to your bait. You would never have the balls to put a Paladin (that almost died) up against 2x Vindicators, or ever PVP in a Vindicator at all. The only thing you would have the balls to do is to sit in a massive 100 man blob with 25 carriers. You alliance name says all about you. EDIT: I find it very funny that alot of you here comes here and goes totally bawwww, you have no risks bla bla bla, while you forget what you are doing your self in 0.0 space and what alliance you are in. Think about that for a second before you post. Ushra'Khan is in nullsec? When did this happen? Did CCP suddenly change the sec status of Kourmonen and Auga the last couple hours? It still doesn't change the fact that you still don't have the balls to use a Vindicator or a Paladin worth billions of isks in PVP. EDIT: Hah, got the page 20 snipah   . Now, my next goal is to reach page 50.
Oh I'm sure you'll get there, even if half the posts have to be by you.
Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. Never forgotten, never forgiven. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 04:44:00 -
[384] - Quote
Apolyon I wrote:NightmareX wrote:Davion Falcon wrote:NightmareX wrote:Davion Falcon wrote:You fooled me once. I thought you were genuinely serious about this whole highsec pvp thing is "pro", and had so many unknown variables that are impossible to account for and thus, "risky" and require "balls of steel" to pull off.
But now I see you for the magnificent troll you are. There's no way anyone could possibly believe the above is true of eve highsec pvp. I tip my hat to you good sir, I shall rise no more to your bait. You would never have the balls to put a Paladin (that almost died) up against 2x Vindicators, or ever PVP in a Vindicator at all. The only thing you would have the balls to do is to sit in a massive 100 man blob with 25 carriers. You alliance name says all about you. EDIT: I find it very funny that alot of you here comes here and goes totally bawwww, you have no risks bla bla bla, while you forget what you are doing your self in 0.0 space and what alliance you are in. Think about that for a second before you post. Ushra'Khan is in nullsec? When did this happen? Did CCP suddenly change the sec status of Kourmonen and Auga the last couple hours? It still doesn't change the fact that you still don't have the balls to use a Vindicator or a Paladin worth billions of isks in PVP. EDIT: Hah, got the page 20 snipah   . Now, my next goal is to reach page 50. http://kb.eveaquila.com/?a=kill_related&kll_id=22792http://kb.vergeofcollapse.com/?a=kill_related&kll_id=5937please don't bring your vindi up to scare people, warp that vindi into a bubble and fight there then talk to us about the risk of fighting in shiny ships. about wh and 0.0, you have absolutely no clue about how things work there, pal. in wh, there's this thing that everyone in 0.0 hates called cloak, which hide yourself from dscan, that + no local in wh makes it impossible to estimate the exact number of hostile fleet. in 0.0, every single people in local that not in your fleet are hostile and they use cloak to approach you. both place have this thing all carebears hate called bubble to get your shiny pod. saying that using expensive pod in LS is pure ********
I have all the experience i need to fully understand how 0.0 space is. I have been living there for over 4 years. Just saying.
Anyways, the first link you posted there shows a Kronos loss. That setup it was using was laughable. With the setup it was using, it had a total value of 1.45 bill isk. Not really much isk to lose in that. My Vindicator cost 6 bill isk now with the new officer Heavy Capacitor Booster it has now.
Now try to bring a Kronos, Bhaalgorn or a Vindicator out in PVP with such expensive setups like mine instead.
Now i don't know what kind of setups the Bhaalgorns are using. Care to share?
But congrats i'll guess, you are maybe one of very very few in 0.0 space who use pirate BS'es. Not easy to come over corps'es in 0.0 space who do that nowdays. |

Prozacxx
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 08:31:00 -
[385] - Quote
NightmareX wrote: If this movie had been posted by anyone else, then this topic wouldn't even be 4 pages long yet.
ur absolutely right
ur one of a kind |

Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
142
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 10:38:00 -
[386] - Quote
You still seem convinced that Aquila, one of the most known WH corps in eve lives in nullsec.
It also sound like your Vindicator is fit like a worthless overpriced peice of ****, why would you ever officer cap booster, fed navy web, rf point, deadspace mwd when you are within 1km of the target all the time, everytime. Who actually puts 6bil into a "buffer" vindicator.
If you want to see ballsy use of a Vindicator, expensive fit and with high risk of dieing watch any Gods Coldblood video and be put back in your place, get the **** off your high chair and smell the coffee. You are ****, your corp/alliance is ****, your movie is ****, your arguments are ****. You. Are. ****. Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |

DARKSTAR POWNYOUALL
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 11:13:00 -
[387] - Quote
SO BASICALLY, THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE (EVERYONE) IN THIS THREAD THINKS YOUR VIDEO IS ****, BUT THEIR OPINION DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE THEY LIVE IN 0.0 SPACE. AND EVERYONE ELSE WHO THINKS THE SAME THING BUT DOESN'T LIVE IN 0.0, THEIR OPINION DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE THEY AREN'T THE MAJORITY.
YOU SIR, ARE AN ABSOLUTE ******* R-TARD. |

Khanh'rhh
1622
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 12:01:00 -
[388] - Quote
OP: "You take no risks because you PVP in nullsec, but I have a neutral Guardian for every single DPS ship we field and that's risky"
As I said before, if you don't know exactly how many you are facing in highsec PVP then you are bad at the game. Busy system or not, you have the tools and ability to get 100% intel without risking the scouts or having it known that you know.
If you are unable to do this, then you are bad. There is no "risk" in having spare Guardians in 4-4 ready to log on if you find out you can't count.
With the amount of neutral guardians seen in the video you'd be able to tank a sieged Moros whilst de-aggroing, so I have no idea what you think the risk from scrubby battleships is.
The paladin nearly died because it had no buffer - having a badly fit ship nearly die is not indicative of risk.
PLEASEEE tell us you don't literally think what you write? How can you possibly believe you are right? - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Miura Bull
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
20
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 12:25:00 -
[389] - Quote
I read the threadnaught first and then clicked the video....... unfortunately I remembered my recently creosoted fence was just finishing the last stages of its drying process and thus I quickly dashed away from the computer to catch the dramatic final moments. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
79
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 13:46:00 -
[390] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:OP: "You take no risks because you PVP in nullsec, but I have a neutral Guardian for every single DPS ship we field and that's risky"
As I said before, if you don't know exactly how many you are facing in highsec PVP then you are bad at the game. Busy system or not, you have the tools and ability to get 100% intel without risking the scouts or having it known that you know.
If you are unable to do this, then you are bad. There is no "risk" in having spare Guardians in 4-4 ready to log on if you find out you can't count.
With the amount of neutral guardians seen in the video you'd be able to tank a sieged Moros whilst de-aggroing, so I have no idea what you think the risk from scrubby battleships is.
The paladin nearly died because it had no buffer - having a badly fit ship nearly die is not indicative of risk.
PLEASEEE tell us you don't literally think what you write? How can you possibly believe you are right?
We can count and see how many blinky blinkys there are in system, but do we know where in system they are if they are undocked?
Ofc, are they docked in a station, then that's fine, but we can't get info on what ship(s) they have there then.
If you think it's easy to scan out war targets in Jita, then i'm afraid you are totally wrong. You have never tried to scan out war targets in a system like Jita if you think it's easy.
Anyone who think it's easy have failed EVE and empire totally.
Please explain how it's easy to scan out war targets in Jita?
I'm gonna sit ready with lots of popcorn ready to read you loltastic answer here.
Other than that, nice bawwww and waah waah post.
DARKSTAR POWNYOUALL wrote:SO BASICALLY, THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE (EVERYONE) IN THIS THREAD THINKS YOUR VIDEO IS ****, BUT THEIR OPINION DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE THEY LIVE IN 0.0 SPACE. AND EVERYONE ELSE WHO THINKS THE SAME THING BUT DOESN'T LIVE IN 0.0, THEIR OPINION DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE THEY AREN'T THE MAJORITY.
YOU SIR, ARE AN ABSOLUTE ******* R-TARD.
Guys, i don't think we can take 'I'M SO COOL BECUZ I CAN WRITE IN CAPS LOCK CUZ IT'S LIKE CRUISE CONTROL' players seriously.
LOL, just look at this post. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |