Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 16:47:00 -
[481] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:NightmareX wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:Its kinda funny that your last kill was 2 months ago, your last loss was in September when you were in lolnulli and it was a vagabond that died to Aquila.
You seem mega butthurt about how bad 0.0 is and how risk free it is when you are were flying with one of thee worse alliances in the game. You claim to have 4 years of 0.0/lowsec pvp experience and complain it is all about blobbing yet you only have 600 kills to backup this said experience, almost all of them with 10+ on the km. Before you start calling me a KB ****, I dont care about killboards but its a damn good way to help backup an argument about your experience.
You also insult people, saying they have a lack of balls to fly expensive ships and risk them. Yet when you went to lowsec and ganked the dread + carrier, for some strange reason you downgraded to a standard Megathron.
You really are a fuking Hypocritical ******. Awww, it's not me that seems butthurt. It's actually you that seems really butthurt because you fail at EVE and can't even find anything in empire to do and have to escape to 0.0 space while i release a movie that actually shows that there is quite alot of action in empire as long you are not a lazy ****. I'm not butthurt of 0.0 space. I'm just really bored of 0.0 space simply because all it was about when i was there was blobbing, and i'm pretty sure it's still about blobbing and who have the biggest blob and e-peen. Yeah i might insult someone for not having the balls to fly really expensive ships in PVP while you insult us empire PVPers by saying awww booohoo, you use logistics and it's gay. It's as much gay as you using logistics and carriers in 0.0 space to. I fail at eve? Im much better at this game than you m8, I actually go out, solo pvp and risk my ships. You also seem like a complete ******* idiot really, I fly solo and come across blobs and just kill some of them and move onto the next one. Its all about tactics, you are just so utterly blind and stupid your only experience is being in a blob and being blobbed by a smarter blob because nulli is ******* ****. I also dont use any form of RR, I dont use carriers. Get your facts right before, yet again dont insult someone that is superior to you in every way. After that post I am sure you are a very good troll, especially with things like Quote:It's as much gay as you using logistics and carriers in 0.0 space to Quote:because you fail at EVE and can't even find anything in empire to do and have to escape to 0.0 space while i release a movie
You know i talk about every 0.0 space players in this topic right?
Even though that you might not be a 0.0 space blobber, you will still get stamped as it because most from 0.0 space does it. 0.0 space as a whole gets stamped as blob space, because it's all about who have the biggest blob.
Of course, if you cries about logistics being used in empire, then we in empire will ofc cry about gay carriers and other capital ships being used in 0.0 space or in low sec. You either have to HTFU or deal with logistics being used in empire. In the same way as we have to deal with carriers being used all the time in 0.0 space.
You know, if you bite, i will absolutely bite back.
EDIT: You would never engage anyone solo if you know 100% that you will win pal.
And if you know 100% that you will win, then it's risk free. |
Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
673
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 16:56:00 -
[482] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:
EDIT: You would never engage anyone solo if you know 100% that you will win pal.
And if you know 100% that you will win, then it's risk free.
Come to think of it, I have never seen a video by you where you actually lose a ship. You edit out those bits or simply forget to whatever key you have binded fraps to? I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |
Mortvvs
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
5
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 17:04:00 -
[483] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:NightmareX wrote:
EDIT: You would never engage anyone solo if you know 100% that you will win pal.
And if you know 100% that you will win, then it's risk free.
Come to think of it, I have never seen a video by you where you actually lose a ship. You edit out those bits or simply forget to whatever key you have binded fraps to? Once you reach his level of PvP, you simply stop losing. FREE FILINGO |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 17:09:00 -
[484] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:NightmareX wrote:
EDIT: You would never engage anyone solo if you know 100% that you will win pal.
And if you know 100% that you will win, then it's risk free.
Come to think of it, I have never seen a video by you where you actually lose a ship. You edit out those bits or simply forget to whatever key you have binded fraps to?
Now i don't PVP that often nowday, so it might be that?
Or it might be to the strict rules of not losing ships in Rebirth?
Or it might be that i'm just good at not losing ships?
Considering that we have tons of war targets all around in empire, then i think it's a good idea to be very strict against losing ships, because losing Battleships and other ships to bad piloting, or without scouting like some do, then it's actually better to be very strict against losing ships than losing ships in a stupid way.
If we lose ships in a fleet fight, then it's something else. It's not always we can handle the incoming damage on some ships (since we are fighting alot outnumbered) before we have got enough rep cycles in. Like the low sec fight in my movie where the Battlecruiser and Megathron died. There we didn't had got enough reps on them before it was to late.
But the Battlecruiser wasn't Rebirth's loss i think.
|
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
146
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 17:13:00 -
[485] - Quote
Quote:You know i talk about every 0.0 space players in this topic right?
Even though that you might not be a 0.0 space blobber, you will still get stamped as it because most from 0.0 space does it. 0.0 space as a whole gets stamped as blob space, because it's all about who have the biggest blob.
Of course, if you cries about logistics being used in empire, then we in empire will ofc cry about gay carriers and other capital ships being used in 0.0 space or in low sec. You either have to HTFU or deal with logistics being used in empire. In the same way as we have to deal with carriers being used all the time in 0.0 space.
You know, if you bite, i will absolutely bite back.
EDIT: You would never engage anyone solo if you know 100% that you will win pal.
And if you know 100% that you will win, then it's risk free.
Confirming its risk free because I see an opportunity and go for it, once I have decided to go for it the situation remains optimal for me.
This is basically what you are saying.
I used to deal with neutral RR in highsec, back when i was in privateers. I left because it was ****, all I ended up doing was flying around catching idiots on gates or killing random missioners. This is literally all there is to do, you get the odd fight with bads that use rr and still diaf.
Whenever I roam with my corp, we come across carriers but guess what, they are killable unlike your neutral guardians and most of the time they do end up dead.
You just have no idea what 0.0 is like outside a blob and how fun it actually is to manipulate a blob solo, you know why? You dont have the skill for it, the balls or the interest. You would rather sit around in highsec, knowing that when you go into a fight, those 5 WT's among the other 2k people in local is all they have and its safe to engage, that reps will hold.
In nullsec, you can see whats on the gate, you can see the 5 man gang thats there waiting for you. What you cant see is the other 10 out of scan range or the recons cloaked on grid.
The risk in nullsec is much higher than in highsec, risk in highsec only exists for tards flying around in untanked hulks, 20bil lvl4 tengus and haulers with billions in the cargo. Unless you are among these elite special group of retards, then you are on a whole new level of retardation.
Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |
Mac Tir
State War Academy Caldari State
48
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 17:16:00 -
[486] - Quote
25 pages for this **** |
Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
673
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 17:21:00 -
[487] - Quote
Mortvvs wrote:Alpheias wrote:NightmareX wrote:
EDIT: You would never engage anyone solo if you know 100% that you will win pal.
And if you know 100% that you will win, then it's risk free.
Come to think of it, I have never seen a video by you where you actually lose a ship. You edit out those bits or simply forget to whatever key you have binded fraps to? Once you reach his level of PvP, you simply stop losing.
No one will ever reach Farjung's level. Not you, not me and especially not NightmareX. I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 17:25:00 -
[488] - Quote
[quote=Gibbo3771]Quote:I used to deal with neutral RR in highsec, back when i was in privateers. I left because it was ****, all I ended up doing was flying around catching idiots on gates or killing random missioners.
There we have your problem. You don't talk about how empire PVP is in general by having been a member of Privateers.
What Privateers and what we are doing is 2 totally different things. That's what you don't seems to graps. You think empire PVP is **** (even today) just because you had a bad experience with the crappiest PVP alliance in empire.
Yeah sure, it's a long time since i have been in 0.0 space now and it might have been some few changes since last time i have been there. But after what i have heard from others that are living in 0.0 space, it's just station ping pong and blobbing that is the daily plans.
I have a Norwegian friend in the Norwegian channel that is in Intrepid Crossing that was shooting stations yesterday. Fun isn't it?
So just because you or some very few corps'es are doing pretty well in 0.0 space without carriers and all of that ****, it doesn't mean that 0.0 space is a shithold in general.
|
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
146
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 17:45:00 -
[489] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:I used to deal with neutral RR in highsec, back when i was in privateers. I left because it was ****, all I ended up doing was flying around catching idiots on gates or killing random missioners. There we have your problem. You don't talk about how empire PVP is in general by having been a member of Privateers. It's that simple. What Privateers and what we are doing is 2 totally different things. That's what you don't seems to graps. You think empire PVP is **** (even today) just because you had a bad experience with the crappiest PVP alliance in empire. Yeah sure, it's a long time since i have been in 0.0 space now and it might have been some few changes since last time i have been there. But after what i have heard from others that are living in 0.0 space, it's just station ping pong and blobbing that is the daily plans. I have a Norwegian friend in the Norwegian channel that is in Intrepid Crossing that was shooting stations yesterday. Fun isn't it? So just because you or some very few corps'es are doing pretty well in 0.0 space without carriers and all of that ****, it doesn't mean that 0.0 space is a shithole in general. EDIT: So you don't talk about how empire is by having been a member of Privateers long time ago.
I do the exact same thing now that I did im privateers, go and look for fights and I can assure you they are much less frequent, twice as boring and 99% less risky than nullsec.
You are just lying to yourself, you are pretty pathetic.
Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 17:50:00 -
[490] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:NightmareX wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:I used to deal with neutral RR in highsec, back when i was in privateers. I left because it was ****, all I ended up doing was flying around catching idiots on gates or killing random missioners. There we have your problem. You don't talk about how empire PVP is in general by having been a member of Privateers. It's that simple. What Privateers and what we are doing is 2 totally different things. That's what you don't seems to graps. You think empire PVP is **** (even today) just because you had a bad experience with the crappiest PVP alliance in empire. Yeah sure, it's a long time since i have been in 0.0 space now and it might have been some few changes since last time i have been there. But after what i have heard from others that are living in 0.0 space, it's just station ping pong and blobbing that is the daily plans. I have a Norwegian friend in the Norwegian channel that is in Intrepid Crossing that was shooting stations yesterday. Fun isn't it? So just because you or some very few corps'es are doing pretty well in 0.0 space without carriers and all of that ****, it doesn't mean that 0.0 space is a shithole in general. EDIT: So you don't talk about how empire is by having been a member of Privateers long time ago. I do the exact same thing now that I did im privateers, go and look for fights and I can assure you they are much less frequent, twice as boring and 99% less risky than nullsec. You are just lying to yourself, you are pretty pathetic.
Aww booohoo, cry me a river and go hug some bears in 0.0 space instead.
You are just jealous on us because we can do something really good that you fail TOTALLY at doing in empire.
You should rather do the research of war decing those who actually will fight you back. Like we do. |
|
Jack bubu
GK inc. Pandemic Legion
345
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 18:23:00 -
[491] - Quote
son, its time to stop posting
no seriously stop typing those angry words |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 18:25:00 -
[492] - Quote
Jack bubu wrote:son, its time to stop posting
no seriously stop typing those angry words
It's ok mate, just let it out
|
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
147
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 18:32:00 -
[493] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:NightmareX wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:I used to deal with neutral RR in highsec, back when i was in privateers. I left because it was ****, all I ended up doing was flying around catching idiots on gates or killing random missioners. There we have your problem. You don't talk about how empire PVP is in general by having been a member of Privateers. It's that simple. What Privateers and what we are doing is 2 totally different things. That's what you don't seems to graps. You think empire PVP is **** (even today) just because you had a bad experience with the crappiest PVP alliance in empire. Yeah sure, it's a long time since i have been in 0.0 space now and it might have been some few changes since last time i have been there. But after what i have heard from others that are living in 0.0 space, it's just station ping pong and blobbing that is the daily plans. I have a Norwegian friend in the Norwegian channel that is in Intrepid Crossing that was shooting stations yesterday. Fun isn't it? So just because you or some very few corps'es are doing pretty well in 0.0 space without carriers and all of that ****, it doesn't mean that 0.0 space is a shithole in general. EDIT: So you don't talk about how empire is by having been a member of Privateers long time ago. I do the exact same thing now that I did im privateers, go and look for fights and I can assure you they are much less frequent, twice as boring and 99% less risky than nullsec. You are just lying to yourself, you are pretty pathetic. Aww booohoo, cry me a river and go hug some bears in 0.0 space instead. You are just jealous on us because we can do something really good that you fail TOTALLY at doing in empire. You should rather do the research of war decing those who actually will fight you back. Like we do. Ofc, if some contractors want us to kill some miners in low sec, we will ofc do that. But the other war decs that are from our self is war decs against corps'es / alliances that WILL fight back.
Confirming I am terribad at huggin' a station undock and hitting F1.
Gf Gf. Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |
Prozacxx
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
85
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 18:37:00 -
[494] - Quote
i like how he posted a video about pro pvp where a loki sits and jumps, then some random vaga is like hi imma be nano cuz this is easy orbits a thorax at 20km mwd on and thorax just jumps and then dies to rifters cuz he doesnt even know how to burn away lol
who was he couldnt see cuz of **** quality lol? |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 18:40:00 -
[495] - Quote
Prozacxx wrote:i like how he posted a video about pro pvp where a loki sits and jumps, then some random vaga is like hi imma be nano cuz this is easy orbits a thorax at 20km mwd on and thorax just jumps and then dies to rifters cuz he doesnt even know how to burn away lol
who was he couldnt see cuz of **** quality lol?
At least we can prove that we ain't only doing those gay station huggings as you claim we are doing all the time.
And not only that, you wouldn't even go into a fight like the first fight here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OUVmhpO_Tk
That's 9 vs like 40. try that and prove us how good you really are.
Maybe you would do that at range where you can control distance and have no risks. |
Prozacxx
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
85
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 20:58:00 -
[496] - Quote
But u said u could like nano if u want cuz its so easy and risk free then u post a vid where u clearly are ******* utterly terrible at it?
WHY I MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL IS SO HARD |
ry ry
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
121
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 21:10:00 -
[497] - Quote
:nostradamus:
GOD SQUAD wardec Hydra. Hydra continue not logging in, and GOD SQUAD venture ~0.5km off Rens undock looking for them (before quickly scuttling back).
War expires after a week and GOD SQUAD claim glorious victory because Hydra 'were afraid to fight them' before sliding back into obscurity until the next time somebody notices how monumentally deluded they are and hilarity ensues. Become FEARLESS. |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 21:12:00 -
[498] - Quote
Prozacxx wrote:But u said u could like nano if u want cuz its so easy and risk free then u post a vid where u clearly are ******* utterly terrible at it?
WHY I MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL IS SO HARD
We might be bad with nanos, but that doesn't change the fact that we are better than most in empire when it comes to close range fights (and much better than you at it) with Battleships, Cruisers / Battlecruisers and T3's. |
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
147
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 21:30:00 -
[499] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Prozacxx wrote:But u said u could like nano if u want cuz its so easy and risk free then u post a vid where u clearly are ******* utterly terrible at it?
WHY I MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL IS SO HARD We might be bad with nanos, but that doesn't change the fact that we are better than most in empire when it comes to close range fights (and much better than you at it) with Battleships, Cruisers / Battlecruisers and T3's.
Confirming NightmareX is better at sitting @ zero on a station and hitting f1 than most in empire, you know, the miners, 4-4 traders and missioners.
Infact the missioners actually do more than you, they have to warp around, move between mission gates and pulse there shield booster.
So bad at making valid argument. Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |
Johnny Rook
Beyond Divinity Inc Excuses.
31
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 21:34:00 -
[500] - Quote
just to get some idea of the skills involved, at a rough estimate, what is the fastest you have gone from hearing a primary called, locking it then hitting F1? |
|
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 21:42:00 -
[501] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:NightmareX wrote:Prozacxx wrote:But u said u could like nano if u want cuz its so easy and risk free then u post a vid where u clearly are ******* utterly terrible at it?
WHY I MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL IS SO HARD We might be bad with nanos, but that doesn't change the fact that we are better than most in empire when it comes to close range fights (and much better than you at it) with Battleships, Cruisers / Battlecruisers and T3's. Confirming NightmareX is better at sitting @ zero on a station and hitting f1 than most in empire, you know, the miners, 4-4 traders and missioners. Infact the missioners actually do more than you, they have to warp around, move between mission gates and pulse there shield booster. So bad at making valid argument.
Yeah, confirming that warping into a fight at a station is totally risk free. In the same way as warping into a fight in low sec or 0.0 space at a gate is totally risk free.
|
Rengas
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 23:30:00 -
[502] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:NightmareX wrote:Prozacxx wrote:But u said u could like nano if u want cuz its so easy and risk free then u post a vid where u clearly are ******* utterly terrible at it?
WHY I MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL IS SO HARD We might be bad with nanos, but that doesn't change the fact that we are better than most in empire when it comes to close range fights (and much better than you at it) with Battleships, Cruisers / Battlecruisers and T3's. Confirming NightmareX is better at sitting @ zero on a station and hitting f1 than most in empire, you know, the miners, 4-4 traders and missioners. Infact the missioners actually do more than you, they have to warp around, move between mission gates and pulse there shield booster. So bad at making valid argument. Yeah, confirming that warping into a fight at a station is totally risk free. In the same way as warping into a fight in low sec or 0.0 space at a gate is totally risk free.
So you're saying I can dock at gates now? |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 23:36:00 -
[503] - Quote
Rengas wrote:NightmareX wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:NightmareX wrote:Prozacxx wrote:But u said u could like nano if u want cuz its so easy and risk free then u post a vid where u clearly are ******* utterly terrible at it?
WHY I MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL IS SO HARD We might be bad with nanos, but that doesn't change the fact that we are better than most in empire when it comes to close range fights (and much better than you at it) with Battleships, Cruisers / Battlecruisers and T3's. Confirming NightmareX is better at sitting @ zero on a station and hitting f1 than most in empire, you know, the miners, 4-4 traders and missioners. Infact the missioners actually do more than you, they have to warp around, move between mission gates and pulse there shield booster. So bad at making valid argument. Yeah, confirming that warping into a fight at a station is totally risk free. In the same way as warping into a fight in low sec or 0.0 space at a gate is totally risk free. So you're saying I can dock at gates now?
Hint: You can jump. |
Khanh'rhh
1627
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 23:57:00 -
[504] - Quote
A rational person would see 26 pages wherein not a single person agrees with him as a sign he might be wrong.
For NIghtmareX, it's because every single other person is wrong and the only risky PVP is when you do it stationary within a docking ring with a neutral Guardian for each DPS ship.
You're all wrong!
I mean, its not like YouTube is full of PVP videos where people PVP solo or in small gangs well away from the docking radius, is it?
No... the paragon of skill here is when all ships are at 0 on a station and not moving.
DO NOT SAY OTHERWISE YOU ARE A 0.0 FANBOI OMG BLOBLBOBBBBB - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
147
|
Posted - 2012.07.17 00:04:00 -
[505] - Quote
Quote:Hint: You can jump.
What if they jump 5 guys over and then leave the other 5 on the first side. Log off is probably the only way out of this right?
Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |
Khanh'rhh
1627
|
Posted - 2012.07.17 00:11:00 -
[506] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:We might be bad with nanos, but that doesn't change the fact that we are better than most in empire when it comes to close range fights (and much better than you at it) with Battleships, Cruisers / Battlecruisers and T3's. Can you explain how you are better at sitting still and not doing anything than the other people?
How does one best not move? Is there a threshold of skill?
I'm being serious. You think you are better at this than other people, explain how.
The reality is there IS no way of being better other than simply always ensuring you have more neutral guardians than you need.
That is it, that is all there is to it. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.17 00:19:00 -
[507] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:A rational person would see 26 pages wherein not a single person agrees with him as a sign he might be wrong.
For NIghtmareX, it's because every single other person is wrong and the only risky PVP is when you do it stationary within a docking ring with a neutral Guardian for each DPS ship.
You're all wrong!
I mean, its not like YouTube is full of PVP videos where people PVP solo or in small gangs well away from the docking radius, is it?
No... the paragon of skill here is when all ships are at 0 on a station and not moving.
DO NOT SAY OTHERWISE YOU ARE A 0.0 FANBOI OMG BLOBLBOBBBBB
Hi 0.0 space fanboi. How does it feel to be a 0.0 space fanboi who ony have the balls to PVP only if you have 25+ carriers in your 0.0 space fleet?
Mmmm, playing the no risk game is serious business in 0.0 space i hear
Khanh'rhh wrote:NightmareX wrote:We might be bad with nanos, but that doesn't change the fact that we are better than most in empire when it comes to close range fights (and much better than you at it) with Battleships, Cruisers / Battlecruisers and T3's. Can you explain how you are better at sitting still and not doing anything than the other people? How does one best not move? Is there a threshold of skill? I'm being serious. You think you are better at this than other people, explain how. The reality is there IS no way of being better other than simply always ensuring you have more neutral guardians than you need. That is it, that is all there is to it.
We use logistics and you use carriers. Is there any difference in them in PVP?
We are sitting still because our enemies are sitting still. Duuuuh HELLOOOO?
Should we just activate out MWD and orbit all of our enemies at 5 km while they are sitting still with our ships when we are at a station or gate lols?
Or should we just MWD towards a gate when we are at a station so our close range Battleships gets out of their optimal range on their weapons?
Here is a hint. We are not doing PVP in 0.0 space bro. We are in empire FYI.
If your enemies in 0.0 space hadn't been moving, you would just sit there at 0 m/s you self spamming for carrier reps. But because most in 0.0 space are moving, then you are moving to.
But i feel that you are pretty stupid at this game it sounds like by your posting. |
Khanh'rhh
1627
|
Posted - 2012.07.17 00:59:00 -
[508] - Quote
Well, that's the post I needed to fully realise you're actually serious and not just trolling.
I feel bad that you can't even imagine WHY you might need to move, but I could explain it to you perfectly and you'd just ignore it, because it's not a solution based on having more Guardians.
I will say that if you didn't have mass numbers of neutral Guardians then you would discover why you would want to move, but frankly you do, so sitting perfectly still will work for you.
It remains a very, very low skill option and no one will ever respect you for it.
I guess your only fan is yourself, but you seem to like it that way so I will leave you to it. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.17 01:04:00 -
[509] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Well, that's the post I needed to fully realise you're actually serious and not just trolling.
I feel bad that you can't even imagine WHY you might need to move, but I could explain it to you perfectly and you'd just ignore it, because it's not a solution based on having more Guardians.
I will say that if you didn't have mass numbers of neutral Guardians then you would discover why you would want to move, but frankly you do, so sitting perfectly still will work for you.
It remains a very, very low skill option and no one will ever respect you for it.
I guess your only fan is yourself, but you seem to like it that way so I will leave you to it.
Can you explain WHY we have to move when there is absolutely no reasons to do it as long as we don't have to or to just GTFO out the fight because we can't dock or something?
But actually, we are moving around in the movie though. In some fights we are pretty much sitting still. But even if we do that sometimes, it doesn't mean we always do that.
Like in the last fight where we doesn't have enough DPS, so we tried to bump one of the Dominix'es out of RR range even though we failed at that. |
Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
160
|
Posted - 2012.07.17 01:17:00 -
[510] - Quote
I'm just gonna say it. Any corp that has a rule against losing ships is doing it wrong. Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |