Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Suleiman Shouaa
The Tuskers
132
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 09:58:00 -
[31] - Quote
More interesting than your previous videos, I'll grant you that.
But sitting still and pressing F1-F3 on the primary is no more interesting for me than a CFC fleet where they orbit an anchor and shoot missiles. Arguably, it's less exciting - at least they broadcast for reps! |

Klown Walk
Antipodean inc. Outbreak.
104
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
There is reasons why you don-¦t see empire pvp videos, it-¦s boring to watch for most people that-¦s not into high sec wars. It also seems like you think it takes more piloting skills in empire than lowsec/0.0 when you don-¦t even move and have a bunch of logistic ready to rep you as soon as you take dmg, for all I know that looks 100% risk free. Bragging about stats in this thread doesn-¦t help either. |

ArmyOfMe
Omniscient Order
92
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 10:46:00 -
[33] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:
Always remember that we are fighting outnumbered ALOT of the time. In the last fight in the movie we have 1x Dominix, 1x Megathron, 1x Deimos and 4x Logistics vs 4x RR Dominix, 1x Typhoon, 2x Megathron, 1x Scorpion, 1x Drake and 1x Blackbird. Don't you think it's a risky game to engage that with what we had, considering that they had a Blackbird that could jam our logistics?
It's called good teamwork and very good piloting. Specially when we managed to kill a Scorpion and a Drake (yeah forgot to put the Drake into the battlereport in the movie) while we had 0 losses against that.
No, with 4 logis thats not a risky fight at all. They had nothing fast enough to tackle your logis, and their dps isnt able to break 4 guardians in the ammount of time needed. Oh, and if you havnt noticed on these forums, the movies that actually do get liked the most are ppl flying around killing **** while fighting against larger numbers (without the use of logis) Specially solo fights and 2 - 3 man gangs where skills actually do come in to play. ArmyOfMe > i swear my drones have become even more stupid after the patch Wanna Kill > as usually im way ahead of you, my drones have been drooling idiots for ages |

mama guru
Evolution The Retirement Club
53
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:10:00 -
[34] - Quote
The video was well edited and long enough but boring like some people said.
People who call this lame need to remember that there are ways to get people off a station even when they sit in a vindicator. It's rather telling about how unimaginative an opponent is when they cant even figure out how to counter a tactic thats been around since 2007, like the one rebirth is using. Let's just say natural selection has it's way around stupid people, but when there are rules in place that prevent that from happening stuff looks the same year after year.
Say what you want, but empire warriors in general have simply zero reason to innovate. The mechanics are simpler and have not changed one bit in ages, even the most insane bumping stunts will only get you a kill or two before they all redock anyway. Rebirth wont fight off a station/Gate because they know if they ever run into a fleet of machs/scimitars supported by a few Recons they are completely ****** if that happens a few hundred kilometers off a station or gate.
Take this example:
The only reason why nullsec supercap pvp is so stagnant compared to subcaps is that armor and brawling tactics are much more dominant amongst supers vs supers as compared to subcaps vs subcaps. Capital pvp is alot riskier since once you commit there is always a risk that you get outgunned or outmanouvered. Subcaps are largely shield dominant so you get alot more room to manouver and minimise casualties in the event of a mistake.
Highsec pvp vs nullsec pvp is not a debate about risk vs reward. It's a debate about the lack of dynamics in highsec pvp.
______
EVE online is the fishermans friend of MMO's. If it's too hard you are too weak. |

Daneel Trevize
The Scope Gallente Federation
156
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:19:00 -
[35] - Quote
Nightmare, you need to decide/better express the isk & risk value associated with this flying, you've flipflopped between 5bil BSs being easily able to be replaced, and something that would take weeks for each loss. Less posturing, more being open with your audience. AKA stick to one story. No one much cares if you're superspacerich or put everything into 1 ship, only the relative worth to yourself and if/how that affects your thoughts while flying it. Remember, new pilots would be terrified of losing a T2 fitted HAC, while AT winners can go fly 5bil Machs + full pirate implants in nullsec and lose them several times a week. Your fleet setup has a value unique to yourselves, you probably need to convey this better to produce the tension that leads to entertainment.
Who says a merc corp shouldn't take losses? Surely it's truely about being effective at whatever the contractor wants done? If they want you to camp a route to mess with people's logistics chains & be a distraction, and you're doing that fine for several hours until the targets get a fleet to smash yours, who's to say that isn't the perfect result even if you lose a lot. Of course it's down to the mercs & hirers as to how such behaviour is valued, but your losses count or cost doesn't really mean much if something greater is achieved, e.g. a moon/station/morale-crushing battle lost. With low losses it could be that you can't get people to fight you or are avoiding too many fights, which might make you a bad choice for certain jobs even if you're isk-efficient when you kill things.
As for station games being the same as gate fights, I expect you're aware of aggro mechanics. So you'd know that if 2 fleets clash at 0 on a gate, there's the options for those being aggressed to jump, but then if they have logis those will be in tackle range rather than safer furthur out, etc. If you try bait with your shiny BSs ahead of your support, there's calculating how far back/well hidden they need to be to not spook the target but also get there in time. And the matter that a decent fleet with logis can have you tackled on either side of a gate so you might be stuck while cap booster/ammo runs out, or just that deaggressing doesn't completely get you away, just that it gives you a minute away from the recons where you have to then fly to break free of lighter tackle. You see how it's not purely applied dps vs reps that makes the fight & demonstrates skill. |

Meridith Akesia
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
123
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 11:21:00 -
[36] - Quote
The editing and music choice was quite good.
The actual pvp content however was boring. Could only watch a few minutes of shooting people on stations before i had to stop watching. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 13:46:00 -
[37] - Quote
Suleiman Shouaa wrote:More interesting than your previous videos, I'll grant you that.
But sitting still and pressing F1-F3 on the primary is no more interesting for me than a CFC fleet where they orbit an anchor and shoot missiles. Arguably, it's less exciting - at least they broadcast for reps!
So please let me know how you are doing empire PVP then?
It's first of all impossible to get our war targets of the stations or the gates. And this is something we have to take into consideration. Just because they won't leave the station or the gate i don't have to stop making movies just because of that.
I'm all fine that you think my movie is boring, but that won't stop me from making more empire PVP videos at all. Empire PVP is a part of the game and there will always be empire PVP videos then.
Sitting still and pressing F1-F3 is as fun as watching a 1 vs 1 fight where the guy who are frapsing are in a nano ships and controlling the range with no risks. It's the same with 0.0 space / low sec fights where someone is hotdropping some carriers (used as a logistic) into a mid size battle in 0.0 space at a station.
Those types of movies as i'm talking about is as fun to watch as it's fun to watch a tree grow.
|

Prozacxx
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
75
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:27:00 -
[38] - Quote
Comedy gold overload |

Suleiman Shouaa
The Tuskers
133
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 14:42:00 -
[39] - Quote
Nightmare, if nano is so easy, please come down to low/null sec and record a video doing so. Controlling range is NOT easy, unless if you burn/align in a straight line and rely on someone else to point things. Dipping in and out of disruptor range is actually pretty difficult. |

ArmyOfMe
Omniscient Order
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 15:26:00 -
[40] - Quote
quick question, do you guys take contracts in low sec? ArmyOfMe > i swear my drones have become even more stupid after the patch Wanna Kill > as usually im way ahead of you, my drones have been drooling idiots for ages |
|

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 16:40:00 -
[41] - Quote
ArmyOfMe wrote:quick question, do you guys take contracts in low sec? 
Yes we do. Didn't you see the low sec fight in my Megathron in the movie?
It was on a contract.
Suleiman Shouaa wrote:Nightmare, if nano is so easy, please come down to low/null sec and record a video doing so. Controlling range is NOT easy, unless if you burn/align in a straight line and rely on someone else to point things. Dipping in and out of disruptor range is actually pretty difficult.
I'm not a solo PVP'er and i will most likely never be that either. It's not my type of playstyle.
Nah, having control of your distance isn't that hard if you knows exactly what you are doing and if you are experienced. In the same ways as we knows exactly what we are doing by having very few losses. |

Hoarr
RPS holdings
32
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 17:15:00 -
[42] - Quote
I was going to come in here and offer you some constructive criticism about how RR-BS is boring as **** to watch even though it might take some technical proficiency to pull off, which makes it a very poor subject for videos, but then you went and said this:
NightmareX wrote: Sitting still and pressing F1-F3 is as fun as watching a 1 vs 1 fight where the guy who are frapsing are in a nano ships and controlling the range with no risks. It's the same with 0.0 space / low sec fights where someone is hotdropping some carriers (used as a logistic) into a mid size battle in 0.0 space / low sec at a station.
Those types of movies as i'm talking about is as fun to watch as it's fun to watch a tree grow.
and this:
NightmareX wrote: Nah, having control of your distance isn't that hard if you knows exactly what you are doing and if you are experienced. In the same ways as we knows exactly what we are doing by having very few losses.
It's clear that you're HILARIOUSLY delusional about your own skill, the content of your video and the ability of others. You're a quintessential example of the annoying dude who says, "I could do it better than you can if I only knew how to do it!"
People here, in these forums, enjoy watching videos where the odds are CLEARLY stacked against the protagonist. No one cares about blobbing. If they wanted to blob, they'd just log on to TQ and do that. People enjoy watching stuff that they couldn't pull off themselves. This means fighting against people that are at LEAST 4, 5, 6 or more times the size of your gang.
As far as BS pvp is concerned, really the only well received one that I've seen was Kovorix's Mael at the end of Everlasting II. That was only because he was in a tandem taking on an entire 20 man camp.
This is all besides the point though. The point is that you've posted your video here, asked people what they thought of it, and then people tried to tell you that you didn't like it, you became very defensive. Here's a summation of the collective verdicts so far. You are clearly a talented video editor. From a technical standpoint, the video was very well made. The content however was boring to people.
If you want to release videos that will be better received, you either need to change your content or change your audience. There is NOTHING wrong with releasing videos for your own alliance that show some of their past victories. Since they were involved in the fight, they have more of a connection with the content and will enjoy it more. If, however, you want to release videos to the greater EvE public, you need to either change the content of your videos, or accept the fact that the vast majority of people won't like your videos and move on with it. It's completely OK to release a video with a niche audience in mind. Just don't try to release it to the greater public and expect it to be a huge hit. |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 17:33:00 -
[43] - Quote
Hoarr wrote:I was going to come in here and offer you some constructive criticism about how RR-BS is boring as **** to watch even though it might take some technical proficiency to pull off, which makes it a very poor subject for videos, but then you went and said this: NightmareX wrote: Sitting still and pressing F1-F3 is as fun as watching a 1 vs 1 fight where the guy who are frapsing are in a nano ships and controlling the range with no risks. It's the same with 0.0 space / low sec fights where someone is hotdropping some carriers (used as a logistic) into a mid size battle in 0.0 space / low sec at a station.
Those types of movies as i'm talking about is as fun to watch as it's fun to watch a tree grow.
and this: NightmareX wrote: Nah, having control of your distance isn't that hard if you knows exactly what you are doing and if you are experienced. In the same ways as we knows exactly what we are doing by having very few losses.
It's clear that you're HILARIOUSLY delusional about your own skill, the content of your video and the ability of others. You're a quintessential example of the annoying dude who says, "I could do it better than you can if I only knew how to do it!" People here, in these forums, enjoy watching videos where the odds are CLEARLY stacked against the protagonist. No one cares about blobbing. If they wanted to blob, they'd just log on to TQ and do that. People enjoy watching stuff that they couldn't pull off themselves. This means fighting against people that are at LEAST 4, 5, 6 or more times the size of your gang. As far as BS pvp is concerned, really the only well received one that I've seen was Kovorix's Mael at the end of Everlasting II. That was only because he was in a tandem taking on an entire 20 man camp. This is all besides the point though. The point is that you've posted your video here, asked people what they thought of it, and then people tried to tell you that you didn't like it, you became very defensive. Here's a summation of the collective verdicts so far. You are clearly a talented video editor. From a technical standpoint, the video was very well made. The content however was boring to people. If you want to release videos that will be better received, you either need to change your content or change your audience. There is NOTHING wrong with releasing videos for your own alliance that show some of their past victories. Since they were involved in the fight, they have more of a connection with the content and will enjoy it more. If, however, you want to release videos to the greater EvE public, you need to either change the content of your videos, or accept the fact that the vast majority of people won't like your videos and move on with it. It's completely OK to release a video with a niche audience in mind. Just don't try to release it to the greater public and expect it to be a huge hit.
I'm not talking about what need most skills to do, i'm talking about that footages of a nanoship orbiting and controlling the range of some battleships is very boring to, because those fights ends in the same way as always, that the nanoship wins over them.
This is not about me doing things better than others. It's about doing a good job against what we are fighting.
The thing about my defensiveness here is manly because of the attitude of some peoples over empire PVP movies the last 3-4 years. I KNOW someone will bash an empire PVP movie no matter what, just because it contains station fighting and many logistics.
They simply don't care about how the fight really is, because the station fights and logistics is destroying the movie for them anyways. So like i said, they will whine no matter what.
And therefor, i'm more defensive against those who just bash a movie without taking into consideration what kind of movie we are talking about. And what kind of playstyle we use.
90% of all movies on this forum are 0.0 space fights. Peoples are very used to those types of videos and are not used to see empire PVP movies and will criticise those just because they are TOTALLY different than 0.0 space / low sec movies.
And the fact that it's very rate to come over good fights in empire, then i actually see the fights in my movie for very good coming from empire fighting.
How often have you seen such fights from empire the last 2-3 years?
Exactly. I have a good point in what i'm telling here.
Just because empire PVP movies isn't your taste doesn't means it's a bad movie for many others.
And like i also said earlier, 95% of all of those who are posting in the topics under the 'My EVE' section are 0.0 space blobbers or low sec gankers.
How many do you see in any of the movie topics that is actually living in empire and are doing their business'es in empire nowdays?
I can count that on one hand. That's how few players there really is in those topics giving replies.
And it's not a secret that most peoples that are opening this topic and reads is won't give a reply. My topic now have 797 views while i only have 41 replies. How many of those do you think is hating my movie or loving my movie?
It's hard to say. So even if you don't like the movie i'm fine with that, but you don't speak for the big majority in EVE.
I would rather see replies from other empire PVP'ers that do PVP everyday in empire on how they looks at my movie.
Then i'm pretty sure that my standard when it comes to empire PVP is quite high.
|

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 17:45:00 -
[44] - Quote
Gonna write this in a seperate reply.
Just because you whine so much. How do you really expect us to fight in empire when it's hard enough to just get a good fight to begin with?
We can't just ask the war targets to move out of station or away from the gates and fight us just because i have to please some empire PVP haters on a forum.
We fight like we do in empire like you 0.0 space / low sec players fights with blobs and *****.
So i really want to know how you would fight in empire.
Would you just stop using carriers in a fight just because most of us thinks carrier blobbing is boring as hell?
Hell no, you would never do that. And guess what?
I accept that you wouldn't do that because it's your playstyle and i accept that you would make a movie out of it to. I accept it because of how 0.0 space is, so even when i hate carrier blobbing, i will accept that you use it because of how 0.0 space is.
And it's the same way here. Peoples should accept the empire PVP style and take into consideration on how empire PVP really is and how we fights there. It's about impossible to just change on our style just because my / our PVP style doesn't suits your needs.
And you can be damn sure that i won't bend over to some few empire PVP haters. |

Hoarr
RPS holdings
32
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 17:59:00 -
[45] - Quote
Ugh. Fine, it seems like this can only be solved by captain caps lock cruise control. WE AREN'T CRITICIZING YOUR FIGHTING, WE'RE SAYING IT'S BORING TO WATCH. I don't know how else to explain it to you.
As far as nullsec blobbing is concerned, no one enjoys watching videos of it aside from the alliances involved (unless there are some really funny coms or something). Can you point to a single video on here that glorifies blobbing and isn't about a minute long? I sure as sh*t can't. |

Hoarr
RPS holdings
32
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 18:04:00 -
[46] - Quote
Also, this:
http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html?m=1
|

Jack bubu
GK inc. Pandemic Legion
343
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 18:38:00 -
[47] - Quote
oh look, another terrible vid of NightmareX where he goes on and flames everyone who didnt like it lmao
go on dude, and tell us more how you are 1337 pr0 at station hugging
just kidding, you should stop posting forever |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 18:40:00 -
[48] - Quote
Hoarr wrote:Ugh. Fine, it seems like this can only be solved by captain caps lock cruise control. WE AREN'T CRITICIZING YOUR FIGHTING, WE'RE SAYING IT'S BORING TO WATCH. I don't know how else to explain it to you.
As far as nullsec blobbing is concerned, no one enjoys watching videos of it aside from the alliances involved (unless there are some really funny coms or something). Can you point to a single video on here that glorifies blobbing and isn't about a minute long? I sure as sh*t can't.
If my movie is boring to watch, then i'm affraid that empire PVP never will be fun to watch for you guys no matter what.
See where this is going?
Do you see now why i try to get more peoples to accept the style of PVP we do in empire?
|

ArmyOfMe
Omniscient Order
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:00:00 -
[49] - Quote
NightmareX wrote: If my movie is boring to watch, then i'm affraid that empire PVP never will be fun to watch for you guys no matter what.
See where this is going?
Actually, ive seen plenty of good empire pvp movies over the years, and you know what they all had in common? No freaking neutral RR.
And the fact that you state that this is the only way to do empire wars, clearly show how wrong you are. You wont find a single time the last few months where we have flown with logis in the gang (or neutral rr for that matter) ArmyOfMe > i swear my drones have become even more stupid after the patch Wanna Kill > as usually im way ahead of you, my drones have been drooling idiots for ages |

Xanral
Production Minos
18
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:10:00 -
[50] - Quote
Before I comment further, this isn't my cup of tea. I hope that you will not disregard what I'm saying because of that though.
I know some people who do enjoy this style of PvP so I'm going to make some suggestions based on that: - add an ISK destroyed/lost section in the after action screen - add in a little more description at the beginning of how the fight started if it was missed with FRAPS - divide the info box up; left side fighting ships, right side logi - leave the info screen up with the ships until you have something else to show, there is no need for a blank box - provide information mid fight that might build tension in the situation - after providing that information switch the info box back to showing the ships involved and update it as ships leave/join the fray
I think you're providing only some of the information your core viewers would want to have because you've followed a presentation template built for a different audience.
The Rooks and Kings series of video series is an example where they can take an interesting collection of fights and make them amazing by providing context, detailing information on the important bits, and excellent storytelling. If it was just the fights in a vacuum I'd probably find it much less entertaining. |
|

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:27:00 -
[51] - Quote
Xanral wrote:Before I comment further, this isn't my cup of tea. I hope that you will not disregard what I'm saying because of that though.
I know some people who do enjoy this style of PvP so I'm going to make some suggestions based on that: - add an ISK destroyed/lost section in the after action screen - add in a little more description at the beginning of how the fight started if it was missed with FRAPS - divide the info box up; left side fighting ships, right side logi - leave the info screen up with the ships until you have something else to show, there is no need for a blank box - provide information mid fight that might build tension in the situation - after providing that information switch the info box back to showing the ships involved and update it as ships leave/join the fray
I think you're providing only some of the information your core viewers would want to have because you've followed a presentation template built for a different audience.
The Rooks and Kings series of video series is an example where they can take an interesting collection of fights and make them amazing by providing context, detailing information on the important bits, and excellent storytelling. If it was just the fights in a vacuum I'd probably find it much less entertaining.
Thank you. This is something i like to see posted .
Will take this into consideration on my next movie.
ArmyOfMe wrote:NightmareX wrote: If my movie is boring to watch, then i'm affraid that empire PVP never will be fun to watch for you guys no matter what.
See where this is going?
Actually, ive seen plenty of good empire pvp movies over the years, and you know what they all had in common? No freaking neutral RR. And the fact that you state that this is the only way to do empire wars, clearly show how wrong you are. You wont find a single time the last few months where we have flown with logis in the gang (or neutral rr for that matter) Your problem is that to you guys, risking your ships is actually such a dreadfull thought. That again leads to gangs where u cant lose, wich is why your movies are boring to watch. Sadly, though everyone here has been trying to tell you this in all sorts of manner, it just seems you cant grasp the concept of solo pvp or any sort of pvp with risk in it. I guess thats why you allways spent more time on sisi then on tq in the past.
Oh, so what other ways can you do to do empire PVP today?
If you don't fight them at the stations or gates, they will simply not fight. So what you see from my movie is how empire PVP is today.
And those you are talking about had tons of RR's on their BS'es some years ago, so no matter how you look at it, RR's are used.
And lol, i haven't been on sisi for like a year now. Where have you been the last year?
Under a rock ?
Oh, about our fleets. Take for example the last fight in a Dominix. What do you think would happen if the Blackbird had jammed most of our Logis?
It's alot of risk bro. |

Zach Donnell
Ghost-Busters
43
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:If my movie is boring to watch, then i'm affraid that empire PVP never will be fun to watch for you guys no matter what.
See where this is going?
Do you see now why i try to get more peoples to accept the style of PVP we do in empire?
You are too much. How you did you not see this coming? Watching you sit still and press F1 is as boring as it gets...
I will take a minute to expand here.
Midscale pvp, low/null/high all included, is boring in videos I think. Don showed us that small gang (I mean a handful of pilots) pvp can be very interesting in a video, But as the gang sizes increase, there is a disconnect that occurs as a viewer. You can only experience so much of any given fight from the view of one pilot. It becomes harder to get a grasp of the overall fight that is happening and any significance the fight once had begins to drift away. Now in your video(s) you have coupled this with absolutely zero piloting on your part other than pressing F1 when (we assume haha) you get a new primary, it leads to complete snoozefest.
Now, to be a decent person, and give you serious feedback.
The only way your pvp is going to work in a video is approach it from a cinematic standpoint. You have shown us you can rehash After Effects tutorials with moderate success in your intro. Use 'ability' to give us a hybrid video. Alternating between your perspective, cinematic shots OF THE ACTUAL FIGHT (no BS here), and narratives of your dec's, contracts etc mixed in. It doesn't have to be narrated, but that would add to it. +1 for coms (lol) as well. Taking this approaching you could feasibly come up with a decent video, that is enjoyable, and may give you a shot at conveying to us what you find so interesting about this type of pvp.
Good luck
P.S. You are a terrible poster.
|

Prozacxx
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
75
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:52:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ye u ****** what if that blackbird make jam lol? |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:56:00 -
[54] - Quote
Prozacxx wrote:Ye u ****** what if that blackbird make jam lol?
Yeah, it's painfull to get jammed ya know 
Zach, you still know that empire PVP can't be done in a better way as the current mechanics are today?
Same as the 0.0 space cap ship blobbfaggorty can't be changed now because of how the 0.0 space mechanics are today.
EDIT: About the recording of our comms or using more like a commentary to some point is something many of our friends ingame and my alliance mates have told me to use because it would make things quite alot better.
So i might use more time on that on my next video if i can get it done right. |

ArmyOfMe
Omniscient Order
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:33:00 -
[55] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Prozacxx wrote:Ye u ****** what if that blackbird make jam lol? Yeah, it's painfull to get jammed ya know  I give up, you clearly have some "special" needs ArmyOfMe > i swear my drones have become even more stupid after the patch Wanna Kill > as usually im way ahead of you, my drones have been drooling idiots for ages |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 23:24:00 -
[56] - Quote
ArmyOfMe wrote:NightmareX wrote:Prozacxx wrote:Ye u ****** what if that blackbird make jam lol? Yeah, it's painfull to get jammed ya know  I give up
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
|

Amantus
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
73
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 00:15:00 -
[57] - Quote
i havent seen this yet but please post what music you used
i am looking forward to watching this video |

Drealar
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 00:23:00 -
[58] - Quote
If you had made this video with footage from Sisi it would be more exciting.
Then again, after reading your replies I can only assume you believe what you type. In which case, everyone should stop bullying him. He's clearly an idiot.
Now back on topic. OH CUTE, isn't this video amazing! You should be so happy fella, it looks fantastic! |

NightmareX
Rebirth. THE GOD SQUAD
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 00:30:00 -
[59] - Quote
Drealar wrote:If you had made this video with footage from Sisi it would be more exciting.
Then again, after reading your replies I can only assume you believe what you type. In which case, everyone should stop bullying him. He's clearly an idiot.
Now back on topic. OH CUTE, isn't this video amazing! You should be so happy fella, it looks fantastic!
Ahhh, such a cute post. |

God's Apples
The Tuskers
18
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 03:10:00 -
[60] - Quote
How about you compromise? Do an AHAC gang with 2 - 3 in corp logi and record that footage. Then all the whining about neutral logi and sitting still at 0 is null and the footage itself is more interesting.
About the video itself...
Since it is apparent (I hope) that empire PvP is boring to watch you could try to make a story line real or made up and have snip-its of clips sped up maybe 500% touched up with some after effects. This would allow you to entice the viewer just like the triage carrier footage from RnK. Although that large gang footage was boring on its own, when paired with a plot it made it interesting and an over all good watch. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |