EVE Search - High Sec Griefing

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

High Sec Griefing

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Kiradaman	Posted - 2010.05.23 23:05:00 - [1] Some work needs to be done with high sec, concord and salvage. Here is the story below About 6 of us were in a fleet running missions out of ordion. We had a mission with about 5 gates to it. Part of what we do as im sure most do is loot the items and take the salvage. We however did not get most of our salvage because of broken game mechanics. While we were fighting a person by the name of Lexeara flew around and grabed the salvage from us. We were in high sec so we couldn't employ PvP because of concord. So we lost a few million isk because of this person. I am not about to shoot a buzzard with my navy scorp and have concord come possably destroy because of a broken mechanic. Salvage needs to be locked just like loot so if someone trys to take it we have the right to attack. I find this as a system exploit to grief.
Caimeka	Posted - 2010.05.23 23:20:00 - [2] Per CCP Mitnal: Originally by: CCP Mitnal "Our policy on this is extremely clear... Salvaging is a mini-profession within EVE and does not constitute stealing." Per GM Faolchu : Originally by: GM Faolchu Salvaging other peoples wrecks.... This is an intended game mechanic and is in no way an exploit. People salvaging your missions npcs or the player you just blew up are doing nothing wrong. The players are salvaging what is effectively floating rubbish in space and Concord places no value on this wreckage. Eve is a harsh place you won't always have everything go your way, its a do or die world and people do what they can to get along. If salvaging some wreckage gets them a few more ISK someone will do it, it doesn't matter who just blew it up. Per Senior GM Ytterbium : Originally by: GM Ytterbium Players are still completely free to salvage other pilot wrecks at will ... and doing so is not considered as an exploit. Per CCP Prism X : Originally by: CCP Prism X Why is stealing salvage OK? It's not. It shouldn't even be possible to move an item from your cargo-hold / hanger to another persons cargo-hold / hanger without opening a trade window. Before the salvage enters those containers it is not considered your stuff by the server code. Hence it's not stealing. Per CCP Incognito : Originally by: CCP Incognito Had a chat with some designers this evening. Ninja salvaging is intended game play. It was always intended that the wrecks are public, the loot is private. They do not see it as a problem if others salvage your wrecks. (These quotes are kept handy for your convenience at Ironfleet.com.)
Psycros	Posted - 2010.05.23 23:34:00 - [3] Agree 1000%, as do many, many others. Bad enough that your salvage isn't really yours in CONCORD's eyes - how in God's holy name is it fair that someone can come into your mission space without having that mission themselves???. And then rob you of what you spent ammo, time and possibly risked your neck for? If this is how CCP wants it, then f'in do away with all mission gates and deadspace. What's the point if it you can't even enjoy the loot you worked for? Yeah, yeah, "not WoW in space, blah blah blah", save it, mmkay? Either make it so anyone can steal anything, any time, with no consequences or show some consistency, CCP. You're hacking off a lot of customers unnecessarily, and there will be much newer and better-written games out soon..
Baaldor Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate	Posted - 2010.05.24 01:19:00 - [4] Originally by: Psycros as do many, many others... Yes the throngs of support for this is evident in the assembly hall every time it is proposed. Originally by: Psycros Either make it so anyone can steal anything, any time, with no consequences Yes, they used to steal out of cans with out consequences. Bears screamed for the right to shoot them. They got what they asked for. Originally by: Psycros and there will be much newer and better-written games out soon.. Bye.
FISHANDCHIPS	Posted - 2010.05.24 01:56:00 - [5] Your in a nazy scorp and your crying over a few mill LOL oh ps THE SALVAGE DOESN'T BELONG TO YOU
JordanParey Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service	Posted - 2010.05.24 02:27:00 - [6] Link to a thread where they talk about what to do to annoy ninja salvagers [i]2000 B.C. - "Here, eat this root." 1000 B.C. - "That root is heathen, say this prayer." 1850 A.D. - "That prayer is superstition, drink this potion." 1940 A.D. - "That potion is snake oil, sw
Caldari 5 Amarr The Element Syndicate Hand That Feeds	Posted - 2010.05.24 02:45:00 - [7] PvE Tactic for PvP Problem :) Just do what I do, Warp out and leave them with the room agro, if they come back repeat, eventually they will get the idea that you won't protect them by tanking the damage for them.
Kiradaman	Posted - 2010.05.24 03:43:00 - [8] Let me clear something up, I was in a navy scorp. the rest of the people i was with are new so that few million isk is a big deal for them.
Misanthra	Posted - 2010.05.24 04:46:00 - [9] Edited by: Misanthra on 24/05/2010 04:46:21 skip the salvage....about 5 minutes per mission assuming decent skills and salvage tackles. gives more time for missions over a few missions. more rewards, bounties, lp for sale. less of a hit depedning on missions you are getting money wise. don't mission in hubs or systems filled with ninjyas. I run missions for r&d agent standing. get sent to some obscure systems with decent agents actually. Time to wipe the mission (not the motsu lv 4 q 18...but motsu is usually 1 ninjya per mission runner anyway lol), take a break (I AF high lv 2's/low lv 3's till a better ship trained, slow going since the toon spec'd for science learning....doable but time consuming) and wrecks still there when I come back. third option....if grouping this, designated wreck stripper to clean while rest of group kills. Wreck guy still gets paid the bounties and reward, just make sure its someone trustworhty to do fair split. Worst case you and the ninjya's are competing to see who gets more wrecks (have dual boxed and had contests with ninjya's before, my higher skill and salvage tackled ship won lions share lol). if at 50/50....well its 50 you weren't getting before. This is a mini-career that isn't going away.
Mag's the united Negative Ten.	Posted - 2010.05.25 13:41:00 - [10] Originally by: Kiradaman Salvage needs to be locked just like loot so if someone trys to take it we have the right to attack. I find this as a system exploit to grief. No exploit, the salvage is not yours until after you salvage it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive.
Gypsio III Dirty Filthy Perverts	Posted - 2010.05.25 15:25:00 - [11] Originally by: Kiradaman We were in highsec so we couldn't employ PvP because of concord.
Sniperdoc Caldari Eerie Industries	Posted - 2010.05.25 15:26:00 - [12] Edited by: Sniperdoc on 25/05/2010 15:27:52 I do understand that according to CCP this was intended, but it is also illogical. In the United States, back in the early 1900's when prospectors went to the West to stake their claim on land it was against the law for another prospector to pan on already prospected land. EVE salvaging is pretty much similar. When on a mission, that player is prospecting. It doesn't necessarily mean that SPACE is his, but he spent hard earned ISK and Time to kill those NPCs. Hence, legally, the loot AND salvage should be his. Hell, in Tyrannis they're already nerfing the loot by 30%, so allowing any player to salvage wrecks without consequence is a garbage idea. I can't understand why CCP decided that it should be a game mechanic to allow griefing. Now, I have had non-fleeted salvagers show up in a mission and ASK me to salvage. I politely tell them yea or nae and even pay them some ISK for being polite. If they decide to salvage my wrecks without my permission, I just shoot the wrecks they are salvaging so they waste their own time instead of looking for a new victim. Now, as far as Kiradaman's issue... if you had people with you, why didn't you just have a guy hotseat salvaging (salvaging as the mission was going on)? That would have been a logical solution. But, I do agree the current salvaging legalities are flawed. Drakes ROCK!
Mag's the united Negative Ten.	Posted - 2010.05.25 15:30:00 - [13] Originally by: Sniperdoc RL analogies are flawed. Indeed they are. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive.
Robert Caldera	Posted - 2010.05.25 15:34:00 - [14] Originally by: Mag's Originally by: Sniperdoc RL analogies are flawed. Indeed they are. QFT
Ti'anla Minmatar	Posted - 2010.05.25 16:00:00 - [15] Vote against >.> Seriously, how many sci-fi settings are there with major characters pulling salvage 'illegally' (in the eyes of the people claiming it)? What's EVE trying to be? A sci-fi simulator. 'Seems to me CCP are just trying to simulate one more staple of the genre.
MarkyJ	Posted - 2010.05.25 16:15:00 - [16] Edited by: MarkyJ on 25/05/2010 16:16:45 Hmmm...Just my two isks: 1) You say there were six of you. Okay, you presumably need to be in your navy scorp if you're the highest skilled pilot on grid but out of the other 5 pilots with you did no one think to bring a destroyer/salvagecane? No? Well this is the result. If they did, at least you're getting some profit unless they're doing something wrong in which case ask them to try a faster ship. Maybe ask them to fit for speed so they can reach the wreck(yes, wreck. It's not salvage yet after all...) first. Personally, when I mission with a friend one of us (usually me) is always in a salvage boat for exactly this reason. Its boring but thems the breaks. 2) If he's annoying you using 'broken' game mechanics, annoy him back with some more (apparently) 'broken' mechanics. Suicide gank him! If you can fly a Navy scorpion then presumably you can fit and insure a cheapo gank battleship (or battlecruiser if the budgets really that tight). It might even be profitable for you to go pop. 3) It is not griefing. It would be if they followed you across several systems and did it purely to **** you off but from how you make it sound, you missioned in a random system, got picked out by the prober and decided his sole motive was to make your life a living hell. As it is, they're just after profit. That's why they're doing it. Deny them their profit and they'll leave.
Zwyggy Zythum	Posted - 2010.05.25 16:45:00 - [17] I thought all the cry babies went to STO.
Laechyd Eldgorn Caldari Cruoris Seraphim Exalted.	Posted - 2010.05.25 17:19:00 - [18] Fix concord they magically appear in place within few seconds even if you're in deep deadspace. Fix gate guns they are cheating they shoot everyone regardless who they were shooting at and they cannot possibly know who was shooting who in asteroid field.
Whitehound The Whitehound Corporation	Posted - 2010.05.25 17:42:00 - [19] The players in high-sec do not like it when others enter their mission pockets and it was stupid of CCP to aggro these player in this way. The change also broke mission running in low-sec. Now you have threads where players wonder how to populate low-sec again. --
eleve	Posted - 2010.05.26 11:02:00 - [20] If we really are going to make some IRL references, this is like the closest one: Someone throws newspaper at the street and walks away, so I can take it and use it in my owen. Hell, I should even go and blame him from littering. The newspaper had only news value to that person, even thought it could be used to light fire. Why this should be any different in eve? They are wrecks ffs.
Brechan Skene	Posted - 2010.05.26 12:11:00 - [21] Edited by: Brechan Skene on 26/05/2010 12:18:56 Edited by: Brechan Skene on 26/05/2010 12:17:55 To Sniperdoc, You like real life examples? Originally by: Sniperdoc Edited by: Sniperdoc on 25/05/2010 15:27:52 I do understand that according to CCP this was intended, but it is also illogical. In the United States, back in the early 1900's when prospectors went to the West to stake their claim on land it was against the law for another prospector to pan on already prospected land. Here is my real life modern day version Ok here goes, here is the statement I had previously made. ô Therefore what you are saying is that there is no example of a conflict/ engagement (a mission) occurring consisting of winner of the conflict/ engagement (the player) and a loser of the conflict / engagement (the NPC) and subsequently a third party (the Ninja) turning up later and salvaging the wrecks for profit without permission from either the designated player or NPC of the conflict/engagement.ö There is a show on Discovery channel called Treasure Quest. The Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc. (OME) is the world leader in the field of deep-ocean shipwreck exploration.Here is their Wikipedia site. I will be using them as the ninja salvager in the example I had previously posted. Odyssey is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol "OMEX". The wreck that was salvaged is called the "Black Swan". In May 2007, the company announced the largest historic deep-ocean treasure recovery of over 500,000 silver and several hundred gold coins, weighing 17 tons, from a Colonial era site code-named "Black Swan." Spain has claimed rights to the treasure, and the case is currently being litigated in US Federal Court. In the above example Spain has been designated the role of NPC because they were the loser of the conflict. Spain has claimed that it is the frigate Nuestra Senoara De Las Mercedes. From the websites of the Nuestra Senora De Las Mercedes it acknowledges that the ship that made the killing blow was from a British Frigate. Therefore this site acknowledges the winner of the conflict/ engagement (the player)as being the English. At this stage they have not yet made any claims for the items retrieved from the wreck. For this example we will acknowledge that the ship, the "Black Swan" is actually the Spanish ship that was destroyed by British war ships. However if the ship is proven not to be the ship it is still a good example of the basic mechanics of ninja salvaging. How does this example affect the way Ninja Salvaging should be handled in this game, especially if we use this real life example as the basis for the mechanic. I will answer some question based on the "Black Swan" scenario. 1. Does the wreck belong to the mission runner A: No. Currently there has been no attempt by Britain to make any claim for the treasure that was retrieved from the site. 2. The Ninja should be criminally flagged to the mission runner. No. See above answer. Also there has been no criminal action been taken by the British Government against the Company or any of its crew. However the Ship and crew was detained by the Spanish Government and later released. But no criminal charges were enforced against the Company or the crew. 3. Does the wreck and whatever is salvageable belongs to the NPC. A: Maybe, but they have more rights than the mission runner. But that is dependent on court action by the Spanish Government. But it is worth noting that they are the only ones that a currently actively seeking ownership of the items that was recovered from the "Black Swan".
DocSniper	Posted - 2010.05.26 12:32:00 - [22] Jeezus... some terrible analogies. The whole Odyssey thing... wrecks that are over 100 years old... mine are usually created BY me and I salvage them within the hour. Then on top of that, there are numerous legalities that are involved with Odyssey going around Salvaging wrecks. Unless it's in International Waters, those wrecks are NOT free game for anyone to "loot". Besides, they're not going in and taking parts they can use and selling them on the free market. What Odyssey is doing is like going on a mission that has an ancient Caldari Station in Caldari space and you going in and looting/salvaging it when there are clear laws that are set aside for "treasure hunters" to notify whatever government is within that wreck's jurisdiction. Anywho... going off track. What it comes down to is that the player on the mission has done all the work, the loot sets the aggro flag, but the wreck does not? Why? If that's the case, they should have just made it so the loot was free to take too. This half and half concept is garbage. Especially since the salvage is more valuable than the loot over 75% of the time. CCP has lots of great ideas that are always half thought out... I mean look at the interfaces of Eve, features that aren't there but should be based on the concept of the game... CCP needs to stop coming up with new stuff and continue to improve what is already in existence.
The AsteroidDrainer	Posted - 2010.06.07 01:56:00 - [23] there should b some timer or other method for the missioner to have the opportunity to salvage the wrecks he /she has put the effort in to killing maybe 1 hour after mission hand in the wreck becomes scan-able but not while the mission is active should u have some slimy little idiot come in and take the salvage that u have worked for
Misanthra	Posted - 2010.06.07 03:13:00 - [24] Edited by: Misanthra on 07/06/2010 03:15:50 Originally by: Zwyggy Zythum I thought all the cry babies went to STO. that game had problems out the starting gate lol. Even the power of being a trekkie could not keep many friends playing. Originally by: The AsteroidDrainer there should b some timer or other method for the missioner to have the opportunity to salvage the wrecks he /she has put the effort in to killing maybe 1 hour after mission hand in the wreck becomes scan-able but not while the mission is active should u have some slimy little idiot come in and take the salvage that u have worked for The cans aren't scannable, its the mission runner...Want your stuff, dual box a wreck cleaner while running the mission, get a maruader or fly gallente drone death where guns more for distanced room aggro. Least you can compete with the ninjya when they find you.
Gibbo3771	Posted - 2010.06.07 07:30:00 - [25] At least once every 3 days a stupid little highsec bear complains about this.
Srialia Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service	Posted - 2010.06.07 08:04:00 - [26] Edited by: Srialia on 07/06/2010 08:04:48 Originally by: Kiradaman Let me clear something up, I was in a navy scorp. the rest of the people i was with are new so that few million isk is a big deal for them. If a few million is a big deal to them, and you're in a navy scorp, then why don't you float them a loan or something? What's a few million to you? In the time it took you to make your crybaby post and follow up on it by reading responses and replying to them, you could have been in-game making the money you lost to the salvagers five times over. I submit that you're the biggest tool in this whole situation. But then, who's really surprised by that?
Dr Syphilis	Posted - 2010.06.07 10:12:00 - [27] Edited by: Dr Syphilis on 07/06/2010 10:12:19 Just shoot the wrecks till he get bored and leaves. Better nobody have it than some poor hobo (I rather **** in his cup than give him a coin).
Galvatine Caldari Dark Materials Mortal Destruction	Posted - 2010.06.07 12:13:00 - [28] waaa waaa Fly a Maurauder, employ a garbage collector. Simple solutions for a simple problem. If you cannot be bothered then dont complain about it.
Sealiah Minmatar Coffee Lovers Brewing Club Pipe Hitters Union	Posted - 2010.06.09 10:00:00 - [29] Well, if you don't mission in high-end systems you have very little chance of getting ninja salvadged. A solution I prefered and read somewhere was improving AI of the npcs. Improving in a way, that they would cycle targets like sleepers do. Also they should have a very high factor of fire concentration (not like sometimes that there are 10 ships and each ship shoots another person) and the npcs should also stay on target if they deal significant damage to him/her. That way ninja salvaging can be very limited - small ships would get blown by npcs, so ninjas would have to finally invest in big ships. And when they are using big ships they won't be able to salvage as fast and as efficiently. OR you could just shoot the wrecks the ninja tries to salvage. Usually after a few wrecks they get bored and fly away.
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 13:53:00 - [30] The point is not that the original poster is a "whiner". The point is that those who are ninja slavagers AND their supporters are without honor, ethics, or value to the Human species. These individuals are lazy bums, the equivilant of people who go on welfare, if you want a Real Life analogy, and don't try to EARN their keep but would rather sponge off the hard work of others, as opposed to those who are welfare temporarily until they can find a way, and try exceedingly hard to, to EARN their own way. These lazy, guttertrash s****are too lazy to go out and kill, either in PvP or PvE, and are the bottomfeeders, and they should be considered with less value than what many consider "carebears". Why? Because even "carebears" EARN what they obtain. The guttertrash should openly be outed, and treated with the disrespect they have EARNED, which is ALL they have EVER EARNED. An individual who destroys a vessel of ANY type should be considered the "owner" of the salvage because they EARNED the salvage and until they officially abandon it, it should be considered STEALING should some lazy bum, welfare guttertrash who doesn't want to EARN what they take, come along and take what isn't theirs. Such lazy bum guttertrash should instantly be labeled a Pirate and an Outlaw and be treated accordingly by both Concord and players. Any individual attempting to LIE and DECEIVE others regarding the nature of what is CLEARLY stealing by lazy bum welfare guttertrash is just as dishonorable, unethical, and without value to the Human species. The analogy to treasure seekers salvaging wrecks after both the original owner AND any who may have had a hand in the object becoming a "wreck" having been long since deceased, and therefore no existing claim (ie "abandoned" wreck) is false because we are talking about individuals who (1) still exist and (2) did not officially "abandon" the wreck. The cery existance of "abandon" wreck is evidence of OWNERSHIP of the salvage by those who EARNED the salvage.
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2010.06.09 14:04:00 - [31] Originally by: Jaron Stirling Any individual attempting to LIE and DECEIVE others regarding the nature of what is CLEARLY stealing by lazy bum welfare guttertrash is just as dishonorable, unethical, and without value to the Human species. With this I assume you are referring to CCP? Smooth. - DesuSigs - Now with ThreadAssignÖ and SigSelectÖ
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 14:16:00 - [32] Originally by: eleve If we really are going to make some IRL references, this is like the closest one: Someone throws newspaper at the street and walks away, so I can take it and use it in my owen. Hell, I should even go and blame him from littering. The newspaper had only news value to that person, even thought it could be used to light fire. Why this should be any different in eve? They are wrecks ffs. That is the equivilant of "Abandon" wreck. The Real Life equivilant is placing a newspaper down beside you on a picnic table in a park where you and your family have been eating. Your family is out playing. Your things are still there (the comparison to not having "Complete Mission", therefore the deadspace still exists). And you have gotten up and gone to the grill to fill some plates. The newspaper has been read. No one is going to read it anymore. But it has not been thrown in the trash ("abandoned"). Because someone feels you aren't going to use that newspaper anymore, do they actually have the Right to come up and take it off the table without asking you if they can have it?
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 14:22:00 - [33] Originally by: Crumplecorn Originally by: Jaron Stirling Any individual attempting to LIE and DECEIVE others regarding the nature of what is CLEARLY stealing by lazy bum welfare guttertrash is just as dishonorable, unethical, and without value to the Human species. With this I assume you are referring to CCP? Smooth. Or anyone, INCLUDING players, who support and justify such acts with additional lies and deceit. Make no mistake, backing up and supporting lies and deceit are COMMITTING lies and deceit.
Jacqueline Harrien Hulkageddon Orphanage	Posted - 2010.06.09 14:51:00 - [34] Originally by: Jaron Stirling The cery [sic] existance [sic] of "abandon" wreck is evidence of OWNERSHIP of the salvage by those who EARNED the salvage. Incorrect. At the very most, it might be considered evidence of ownership of the loot contained within the wreck by those who destroyed the ship. Really, I don't understand why whinging noobs insist on bringing this "idea" up again... and again... and again... and again... and again. In fact, over the last 2 years, I have not once been in this forum without seeing thread full of tear-filled whines about salvaging in the first page, filled with fail carebears exhibiting the exact same pathetic sense of entitlement that we see here. Get lost; nobody cares, least of all CCP (for evidence, see first reply in this thread)
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 14:57:00 - [35] Originally by: Jacqueline Harrien Originally by: Jaron Stirling The cery [sic] existance [sic] of "abandon" wreck is evidence of OWNERSHIP of the salvage by those who EARNED the salvage. Incorrect. At the very most, it might be considered evidence of ownership of the loot contained within the wreck by those who destroyed the ship. Really, I don't understand why whinging noobs insist on bringing this "idea" up again... and again... and again... and again... and again. In fact, over the last 2 years, I have not once been in this forum without seeing thread full of tear-filled whines about salvaging in the first page, filled with fail carebears exhibiting the exact same pathetic sense of entitlement that we see here. Get lost; nobody cares, least of all CCP (for evidence, see first reply in this thread) And there is clearly no end to the dishonorable, unethical, lazy bum guttertrash as yourself who knowingly and intentionally lies to and deceives other in support of criminal THEFT. Guttertrash such as yourself clearly cannot tell the difference between honorable and ethical work and criminal behavior, so you have to deceive others into believing the such acts are legal, when clearly the are NOT. What's the matter guttertrash, afraid to be held responsible for your criminal, dishonorable, and unethical behavior? I spit on you, your family, and any other mentally disturbd sociopath that follows your dishonorable, unethical, guttertrash ideals.
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2010.06.09 15:10:00 - [36] Originally by: Jaron Stirling frothing at the mouth The point being, you just defined the developers of the game as "guttertrash, dishonorable, unethical, and without value to the Human species". Perhaps you are playing the wrong game? - DesuSigs - Now with ThreadAssignÖ and SigSelectÖ
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 15:39:00 - [37] Originally by: Crumplecorn Originally by: Jaron Stirling frothing at the mouth The point being, you just defined the developers of the game as "guttertrash, dishonorable, unethical, and without value to the Human species". Perhaps you are playing the wrong game? The point being that I referred to those who support criminal behavior and attempt to justify it through lies and deceit as such. If that includes said individuals, so be it. If you want to translate them as either the ultimate government of New Eden or the "supreme beings" of New Eden, so be it. Those who operate honorably and ethically with in New Eden MUST do so within either a corrupt, dishonorable, and unethical government system or a universe ruled dihonorable, unethical "supreme beings". In some universes, "evil" must operate within a universe controlled or run by "good" governments or "supreme beings". It is the opposite here. And the honorable and ethical will not, and should not HAVE to be silent on the issue. Of course, the dishonorable and unethical WOULD include depriving others of Freedom of Expression by suggesting "if you don't like it, leave". But then, what do you expect from guttertrash?
Crumplecorn Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations	Posted - 2010.06.09 15:57:00 - [38] What in the name of god are you smoking. - DesuSigs - Now with ThreadAssignÖ and SigSelectÖ
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 16:03:00 - [39] Originally by: Crumplecorn What in the name of god are you smoking. I'm not the one who considers criminal acts to be honorable ethical ones or even attempts to justify them. Perhaps you are merely too mentally disturbed and sociopathic to tell the difference between honorable and dishonorable. Guttertrash usually does have that problem.
Mag's the united Negative Ten.	Posted - 2010.06.09 16:44:00 - [40] Originally by: Jaron Stirling Originally by: Crumplecorn What in the name of god are you smoking. I'm not the one who considers criminal acts to be honorable ethical ones or even attempts to justify them. Perhaps you are merely too mentally disturbed and sociopathic to tell the difference between honorable and dishonorable. Guttertrash usually does have that problem. You should take a break from Eve chap, you're taking it way too seriously. P.S. I'm a pirate in-game and in RL, I even have my own parrot and everything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive.
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 16:49:00 - [41] Originally by: Mag's Originally by: Jaron Stirling Originally by: Crumplecorn What in the name of god are you smoking. I'm not the one who considers criminal acts to be honorable ethical ones or even attempts to justify them. Perhaps you are merely too mentally disturbed and sociopathic to tell the difference between honorable and dishonorable. Guttertrash usually does have that problem. You should take a break from Eve chap, you're taking it way too seriously. P.S. I'm a pirate in-game and in RL, I even have my own parrot and everything. Your P.S. explains your support for criminal behavior in the game. It also is an admission of support for criminal behavior in real life. Clearly a mentally disturbed sociopath if we've ever met one.
Mag's the united Negative Ten.	Posted - 2010.06.09 16:57:00 - [42] Originally by: Jaron Stirling Your P.S. explains your support for criminal behavior in the game. It also is an admission of support for criminal behavior in real life. Clearly a mentally disturbed sociopath if we've ever met one. Damn you're good. Well I'd love to stay and chat, but I've just seen a schooner pass by my window and the parrot's going nuts. I'll be back later after I get my booty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive.
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:06:00 - [43] Originally by: Mag's Originally by: Jaron Stirling Your P.S. explains your support for criminal behavior in the game. It also is an admission of support for criminal behavior in real life. Clearly a mentally disturbed sociopath if we've ever met one. Damn you're good. Well I'd love to stay and chat, but I've just seen a schooner pass by my window and the parrot's going nuts. I'll be back later after I get my booty. Your sarcasm isn't even funny considering that a "pirate" has present day references, from the typically recognized high seas pirate who tends to commit violent crimes to the non-violent "pirate" of financial or intellectual property. Your admission of being a pirate, humourouse intent or not, still has realistic references behind them. You might want to be more careful of aligning yourself with criminal behavior in real life than you just did.
Xirin	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:07:00 - [44] Originally by: Jaron Stirling In some universes, "evil" must operate within a universe controlled or run by "good" governments or "supreme beings". It is the opposite here. And the honorable and ethical will not, and should not HAVE to be silent on the issue. Of course, the dishonorable and unethical WOULD include depriving others of Freedom of Expression by suggesting "if you don't like it, leave". But then, what do you expect from guttertrash? You remind me of those guys who stand on boxes on street corners, holding signs in one hand, an old book in the other, and yelling at me to accept some diety as my lord and saviour. I imagine some churches out there would pay to have someone do that all day. You could make a lot of money, and it would keep you off the forums. Everyone would win.
Mag's the united Negative Ten.	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:12:00 - [45] Edited by: Mag''s on 09/06/2010 17:12:27 Originally by: Jaron Stirling Stuffs Well thanks to you, after setting the house alarm and rowing up the street, that schooner was no where in sight. Now the parrot's gone into a sulk. I hope you're happy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive.
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:14:00 - [46] Originally by: Xirin Originally by: Jaron Stirling In some universes, "evil" must operate within a universe controlled or run by "good" governments or "supreme beings". It is the opposite here. And the honorable and ethical will not, and should not HAVE to be silent on the issue. Of course, the dishonorable and unethical WOULD include depriving others of Freedom of Expression by suggesting "if you don't like it, leave". But then, what do you expect from guttertrash? You remind me of those guys who stand on boxes on street corners, holding signs in one hand, an old book in the other, and yelling at me to accept some diety as my lord and saviour. I imagine some churches out there would pay to have someone do that all day. You could make a lot of money, and it would keep you off the forums. Everyone would win. Or perhaps we could have in game prison systems or even mental institutions for those mentally disturbed sociopaths that believe criminal behavior is good and justifiable. It would get those who commit and support such acts off the servers, hence less lag for those who suffer from it and be a REAL punishment for those who commit the acts. Prison time means no play time for the character. And since ther is real time used for other activities, then so, to, would be prison time. The honorable and ethical would be protected from the exposure of those mentally disturbed sociopaths for days, and even weeks at a time. A TRUE punishment for criminal acts. Not the simple, quick, recoverable punishment of having a ship blown up. What's the matter, criminal? Too afraid to suffer REAL consequences for your dishonorable, unethical, guttertrash acts and support for those acts committed by others? Oh, I forgot, people like you want it EASY. Want to DOMINATE, not be responsible or EARN your way. Typical lazy bum guttertrash attitudes.
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:28:00 - [47] Originally by: Xirin Originally by: Jaron Stirling In some universes, "evil" must operate within a universe controlled or run by "good" governments or "supreme beings". It is the opposite here. And the honorable and ethical will not, and should not HAVE to be silent on the issue. Of course, the dishonorable and unethical WOULD include depriving others of Freedom of Expression by suggesting "if you don't like it, leave". But then, what do you expect from guttertrash? You remind me of those guys who stand on boxes on street corners, holding signs in one hand, an old book in the other, and yelling at me to accept some diety as my lord and saviour. I imagine some churches out there would pay to have someone do that all day. You could make a lot of money, and it would keep you off the forums. Everyone would win. And what you remind me of are those individuals out there who claim that religious protection grants them the Right to commit whatever act they choose, even those acts any intelligent indivdiual would consider criminal acts and violations of other individual's Rights.
Mag's the united Negative Ten.	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:32:00 - [48] and breathe.... Oh the parrot feels much better, just sang him a Sea shanty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive.
Baaldor Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:46:00 - [49] Originally by: Jaron Stirling Originally by: Crumplecorn Originally by: Jaron Stirling frothing at the mouth The point being, you just defined the developers of the game as "guttertrash, dishonorable, unethical, and without value to the Human species". Perhaps you are playing the wrong game? The point being that I referred to those who support criminal behavior and attempt to justify it through lies and deceit as such. If that includes said individuals, so be it. If you want to translate them as either the ultimate government of New Eden or the "supreme beings" of New Eden, so be it. Those who operate honorably and ethically with in New Eden MUST do so within either a corrupt, dishonorable, and unethical government system or a universe ruled dihonorable, unethical "supreme beings". In some universes, "evil" must operate within a universe controlled or run by "good" governments or "supreme beings". It is the opposite here. And the honorable and ethical will not, and should not HAVE to be silent on the issue. Of course, the dishonorable and unethical WOULD include depriving others of Freedom of Expression by suggesting "if you don't like it, leave". But then, what do you expect from guttertrash? Giving you a 8/10 for the troll post. Very well done. Took point away for too much over the top, but gave you points back for getting others to bite.
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:48:00 - [50] Originally by: Baaldor Originally by: Jaron Stirling Originally by: Crumplecorn Originally by: Jaron Stirling frothing at the mouth The point being, you just defined the developers of the game as "guttertrash, dishonorable, unethical, and without value to the Human species". Perhaps you are playing the wrong game? The point being that I referred to those who support criminal behavior and attempt to justify it through lies and deceit as such. If that includes said individuals, so be it. If you want to translate them as either the ultimate government of New Eden or the "supreme beings" of New Eden, so be it. Those who operate honorably and ethically with in New Eden MUST do so within either a corrupt, dishonorable, and unethical government system or a universe ruled dihonorable, unethical "supreme beings". In some universes, "evil" must operate within a universe controlled or run by "good" governments or "supreme beings". It is the opposite here. And the honorable and ethical will not, and should not HAVE to be silent on the issue. Of course, the dishonorable and unethical WOULD include depriving others of Freedom of Expression by suggesting "if you don't like it, leave". But then, what do you expect from guttertrash? Giving you a 8/10 for the troll post. Very well done. Took point away for too much over the top, but gave you points back for getting others to bite. So anything that doesn't support criminal behavior is a "troll post"? Once again, we are presented with the mentality of a mentally disturbed sociopath who thinks that criminal behavior is good and justifiable. Typical guttertrash.
Xirin	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:53:00 - [51] Originally by: Jaron Stirling And what you remind me of are those individuals out there who claim that religious protection grants them the Right to commit whatever act they choose, even those acts any intelligent indivdiual would consider criminal acts and violations of other individual's Rights. It dawned on me for a second that you might be correct, but then I checked the UN Declaration of Human Rights, and I couldn't find anything about salvage from busted up internet spaceships belonging to the person who busted them up. I know I'm just feeding you needlessly, but frankly this thread has made a slow afternoon at work so much more entertaining!
Mag's the united Negative Ten.	Posted - 2010.06.09 17:59:00 - [52] Originally by: Xirin Oh the humanity.... Speaking of that church idea, I'd join in a heart beat. Got any name ideas also, I was thinking, 'Gutter-trash of the Unethical Dishonoured' GUD for short. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive.
Jamaican Herbsman I Love You Mary Jane	Posted - 2010.06.09 18:04:00 - [53] Hi Kiradaman, before posting use search. Here's few threads you may want to read: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1143161 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1165292 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1165292 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1170735 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1171508 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1171393 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1171638 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1174086 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1187421 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1182649 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1188394 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1190794 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1195280 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1195910 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1199510 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1207761 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1233624 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1234371 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1236499 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1252340 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1245672 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1245672 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1256539 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1262895 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1264157 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1298345 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1297563
Jaron Stirling	Posted - 2010.06.09 18:06:00 - [54] Originally by: Xirin Originally by: Jaron Stirling And what you remind me of are those individuals out there who claim that religious protection grants them the Right to commit whatever act they choose, even those acts any intelligent indivdiual would consider criminal acts and violations of other individual's Rights. It dawned on me for a second that you might be correct, but then I checked the UN Declaration of Human Rights, and I couldn't find anything about salvage from busted up internet spaceships belonging to the person who busted them up. I know I'm just feeding you needlessly, but frankly this thread has made a slow afternoon at work so much more entertaining! First, believe it or not, I salute you for even KNOWING about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Usually when Rights are referred to, the response is something along the lines of "not everlyone is in the US" (refering to Rights granted under the US Constitution). Secondly: Article 17. ò(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. ò(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. This is the issue that is the primary at hand. Ownership of the salvage which was created by the destruction of an object.
Jamaican Herbsman I Love You Mary Jane	Posted - 2010.06.09 18:14:00 - [55] cont'd http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1288344 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1067174 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1275371 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1268198 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1300185 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1307554 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1323565 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1333356
Tara Aristalia	Posted - 2010.06.09 21:28:00 - [56] There is a very simple way to prevent this or at least reduce it. Simply have a dedicated salvager in your squadron who joins you on the mission. You fight and when you have aggroed the room you call the salvager in to start salvaging. Now if a stranger comes in to do the same they take a risk of being aggroed themselves. If they come later the salvage is already gone. all they have to do is place the salvage in a jetcan and if someone takes from the can they are a legal target. If 6 of you were fighting there is no reason you couldn't have had one more for salvaging. The same people who do this for a living would probably love to join a corp and do it for a share of all loot and the faction and mission reward as well.
President Not'Sure Shut Up Woman Get On My Horse	Posted - 2010.06.09 21:46:00 - [57] Originally by: Jaron Stirling The point is not that the original poster is a "whiner". The point is that those who are ninja slavagers AND their supporters are without honor, ethics, or value to the Human species. These individuals are lazy bums, the equivilant of people who go on welfare, if you want a Real Life analogy, and don't try to EARN their keep but would rather sponge off the hard work of others, as opposed to those who are welfare temporarily until they can find a way, and try exceedingly hard to, to EARN their own way. These lazy, guttertrash s**are too lazy to go out and kill, either in PvP or PvE, and are the bottomfeeders, and they should be considered with less value than what many consider "carebears". Why? Because even "carebears" EARN what they obtain. The guttertrash should openly be outed, and treated with the disrespect they have EARNED, which is ALL they have EVER EARNED. An individual who destroys a vessel of ANY type should be considered the "owner" of the salvage because they EARNED the salvage and until they officially abandon it, it should be considered STEALING should some lazy bum, welfare guttertrash who doesn't want to EARN what they take, come along and take what isn't theirs. Such lazy bum guttertrash should instantly be labeled a Pirate and an Outlaw and be treated accordingly by both Concord and players. Any individual attempting to LIE and DECEIVE others regarding the nature of what is CLEARLY stealing by lazy bum welfare guttertrash is just as dishonorable, unethical, and without value to the Human species. The analogy to treasure seekers salvaging wrecks after both the original owner AND any who may have had a hand in the object becoming a "wreck" having been long since deceased, and therefore no existing claim (ie "abandoned" wreck) is false because we are talking about individuals who (1) still exist and (2) did not officially "abandon" the wreck. The cery existance of "abandon" wreck is evidence of OWNERSHIP of the salvage by those who EARNED the salvage. You are the reason these people exist. You probably know why, but I can point it out for you. You screaming and crying about this makes these people's day. Hell if I thought you were going to have a rage fit like this I'd even ninja salvage you for a good laugh. Though if you bothered to read this thread at all (or one of the millions of other ones that get made every damn week about this) you might find that CCP is of the mind that salvage isn't yours. Period. It only becomes yours AFTER you salvage it**. I bolded, italicized, and underlined the important part there to help you with your terrible reading comprehension.
Zeredek Gallente Vanguard Venture	Posted - 2010.06.09 22:21:00 - [58] Edited by: Zeredek on 09/06/2010 22:21:40 So playing games like Halo, Call of Duty, Counterstrike, Battlefield and the like make you a murderer irl? And yes, I am "leeching of the people who earn their keep", whatcha gonna do? Whine about it? Originally by: CCP Zymurgist CONCORD scrambles, Pod Pilots Scramble, but Faction Navy captains can't squeeze a warp scrambler with the Quafe and cookie dispensing mid-slot modules.
President Not'Sure Shut Up Woman Get On My Horse	Posted - 2010.06.09 22:24:00 - [59] Originally by: Zeredek Edited by: Zeredek on 09/06/2010 22:21:40 So playing games like Halo, Call of Duty, Counterstrike, Battlefield and the like make you a murderer irl? And yes, I am "leeching of the people who earn their keep", whatcha gonna do? Whine about it? Of course because everyone knows the media is always right and since this guy is getting his facts straight from them he must be right.
Agony Etain	Posted - 2010.06.10 00:21:00 - [60] Originally by: DocSniper Edited by: DocSniper on 26/05/2010 12:48:02 Edited by: DocSniper on 26/05/2010 12:46:18 Jeezus... some terrible analogies. The whole Odyssey thing... wrecks that are over 100 years old... mine are usually created BY me and I salvage them within the hour. 1. The wreck DOES belong to the mission runner as the wrecks are pirates and should actually be handled by Concord, but, are instead handled by individuals called Privateers...i.e. US. 2. The Ninja salvager is not working for anyone, did not perform the duty as a Privateer to take on that mission and take on those wrecks. He is freeloading, and essentially should be considered a Pirate. The ninja salvager gains something from nothing. That's not the way the world works. 3. Sure... if the Sansha are making wartime excursions into Caldari Space and want their wrecks back...? How many wrecks did the Japanese come and pick up out of China's seas. How about all the Zero's (Japanese prop planes of WWII) that are stuck in Atolls around Hawaii and the Pacific in general...? At that time the incident/mission occurs, all wartime targets belong to the entity being aggressed by the opposing force. This means, if Sansha are in Caldari space, the wrecks, contents, and whatever else Sansha material is in Caldari space, belongs to the Caldari. Now, if we're looking at going forward 80 years (from the war), then laws and accords, etc are put in place to handle situations like that. E.g. Japanese wanting to come to Hawaii to excavate/raise submarines for historic purposes. Anywho... going off track. The point is, that missions are designed for the privateers of the corporations. Players running missions are in essence subcontracting for corporations. This appointment as a privateer grants them the permission to salvage and loot the wrecks of the aggressors against that corporation. Has the ninja salvager obtained that right from the corporation? No... he's just the guy flying around wanting a free meal ticket. The player on the mission has done all the work, the loot sets the aggro flag, but the wreck does not? Why? If that's the case, they should have made it so the loot was free to take too. This half and half concept is garbage. Especially since the salvage is more valuable than the loot over 75% of the time. CCP has lots of great ideas that are always half thought out... I mean look at the interfaces of Eve, features that aren't there but should be based on the concept of the game... CCP needs to stop coming up with new stuff and continue to improve what is already in existence. I'm reviving this post by Sniper, This was a perfect Analogy, and why salvaging SHOULD put up the kill rights flag. by all plausible, reasonable, and common thinking, it would make sense that a corporation puts a contract out for a privateer in THEIR space, The aggressor does not have rights to their own wrecks because they were the aggressor into another territory. I.E. Minmitar attacking into Caldari space and losing, makes the wrecks Caldari property. This giving the privateer the rights to the loot the WRECKS of the pirate or enemy faction ships, since he or his corp. are the only ones who have been given the right by Caldari or the corporations owner who controls that space. The contract was NOT given to the ninja salvager, Therefore he is stealing and freeloading AKA a PIRATE.
Spins Meats Gallente Metalworks Majesta Empire	Posted - 2010.06.10 01:06:00 - [61] Edited by: Spins Meats on 10/06/2010 01:11:37 Originally by: Jaron Stirling Article 17. ò(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. ò(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. This is the issue that is the primary at hand. Ownership of the salvage which was created by the destruction of an object. Of course, then you might argue that we ALL are violating the Rights of both NPC and player alike when we destroy each other. That's a WHOLE new ball of wax. :) You're applying IRL standards to actions in an internet spaceship game. I'll give you a hint: nothing in Eve is actually real. The game has a set of rules (lets call them 'mechanics') which everybody in-game is subjected to equally, and things such as theft, murder, salvaging, etc are perfectly permissible under these rules. Or, put another way, ninja salvaging in Eve is exactly as permissible as sinking your opponent's cueball in billiards (look this up if you don't get the reference.) Originally by: Jaron Stirling Your sarcasm isn't even funny considering that a "pirate" has present day references, from the typically recognized high seas pirate who tends to commit violent crimes to the non-violent "pirate" of financial or intellectual property. Your admission of being a pirate, humourouse intent or not, still has realistic references behind them. You might want to be more careful of aligning yourself with criminal behavior in real life than you just did. A pirate (IRL) is somebody who takes stuff that isn't theirs (possibly employing violence to do so) on the high seas. Applying that label to people who commit "intellectual property" violations is a gross disrespect to anybody who's had their **** pushed in by pirates on the high seas; people have been making this mistake since Daniel Defoe complained bitterly about "pyrates" with printing presses, and continue to do so. I think, given the parallels between eve ships and actual IRL ocean-going ships, that the term 'piracy' is considerably more apropos in this context than anything to do with "intellectual property". Edit: fixed dumb typos
Sephiroth CloneIIV Section 8 Industries Looney Toons.	Posted - 2010.06.10 04:40:00 - [62] Ironicaly I often skip salvaging and picking up stuff if the targets have bountys. I have done numerous level 4 caldari navy missions in a mission hub that has a 100 or so population, where are the ninjas in my mission? I haven't encountered one. Signature removed for having inappropriate content. Zymurgist
jRonin	Posted - 2010.06.10 11:08:00 - [63] If you can't salvage due to the ninjas, just destroy the wrecks yourself. preferably the ones in their reach. They'll look for someone else. It happens to me only when i want to salvage to get the little space pests... when i leave a ton of wrecks they never come...
Galvatine Caldari Dark Materials Mortal Destruction	Posted - 2010.06.10 12:00:00 - [64] Oh dear god, is this whine not dead yet? Use a maurauder. Use a team. Use a different mission hub. Use your right to blow the wrecks up. Use your right to shoot the "ninja", and man up to the consequences of that right. Use your right to leave the mission a while and let them suck up the incomming dps. The rules of the game are very very clear on this, perhaps you need to find another one? As for this "supporting criminal intent and actions" hell yeah, that is what makes this game fun. Now cry me a river, build a bridge and get over it. Hello Kitty online----------------------->Thataway
1600 RT	Posted - 2010.06.10 13:22:00 - [65] Edited by: 1600 RT on 10/06/2010 13:25:13 i need to start the profession of ninja salvager, these tears are awesome. thanks OP for the hint. edit: you can just go mission run in lowsec or 0.0 no one will ninja-salvage you there and if they do you are allowed to shoot them. lv4 mission in high sec need some sort of drawback

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.