Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 42 post(s) |
DazedOne
The Crabbit S O L A R I S
129
|
Posted - 2012.07.18 20:14:00 -
[181] - Quote
I just pray with these friggin name changes I don't lose more hardwirings. Last time you guys monkeyed around with changing hardwiring names 1 of my gunnery hardwirings magically disappeared out of my clones head. I petetion it and of course I do not get reimbursed, so please before you go tinkering around with these things make damn sure you don't screw us over like you did to me when you changed the gunnery hardwirings awhile back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don't know about the rest of the community but I am tired of things disappearing because you want to make changes...... |
Pandora Neoborn
Mechanical Eagles Inc. The Ancients.
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 02:21:00 -
[182] - Quote
Awesome!
This was exactly what was needed (in my opinion) to make implants accessible to people that are getting into them for the first time. I know some of my corpies are (/were) having issues with it.
You Rokh, FF! |
Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
402
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 04:08:00 -
[183] - Quote
Caldorai Anninen wrote:Why??? Why??? Why CCP so much loving That_strange_very_very_long_names_for_every_thing_in_the_game? Why you think "Auto-targeting" is better than "FoF"???
The whole thing is pathetic.
FOF vs. Auto-Targeting.
And then we have a circle jerk to congratulate them on a name change, that does nothing other than tell us we shouldn't have to learn what F.O.F. means, because that would be too hard.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961
EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody
- Qolde |
azurefox
EVE University Ivy League
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 08:11:00 -
[184] - Quote
Someone give this Dev a promotion... Something useful from someone who thinks logically and that doesn't break something else... Good job. waiting to die is not living |
Digizzzz
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 11:39:00 -
[185] - Quote
I assume you will also change back the following skillname then: Assault Missiles --> Heavy Assault Missiles...
Just to make it uniform once again |
Zanmaru
Gallente Defence Force Illium Consulate
5
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 23:27:00 -
[186] - Quote
F.O.F. what? Next you're going to tell me we have missiles designed to shoot down other missiles. |
Stoleas
Dare Bears
2
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 19:00:00 -
[187] - Quote
Thanks. |
Jonuts
The Arrow Project
278
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 02:57:00 -
[188] - Quote
Sexy Graph. I approve >.> |
Siyis Rholh
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 16:29:00 -
[189] - Quote
"Blood Raiders" is written as "bloodraider" in the Talisman implants' description. My OCD feels this should be brought to the attention of CCP FoxFour's OCD.
Also, that's one sexy graph. |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
306
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 16:57:00 -
[190] - Quote
Siyis Rholh wrote:"Blood Raiders" is written as "bloodraider" in the Talisman implants' description. My OCD feels this should be brought to the attention of CCP FoxFour's OCD.
Also, that's one sexy graph.
WHAT! Can you please write that as a bug report? That way we can make sure there are no duplicates of it and then we can get it fixed. This cannot stand. :/ Content Designer | Team Five 0 @regnerBA |
|
|
Jade Greenfire
KISIN Enterprises
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 14:37:00 -
[191] - Quote
I am hearing allot of people complaining about how over powered ECM currently is (Falcons are a prime example) and how with the new frig chages it is only set to make it worse ( you will be able to take a squad of IBIS and jam out a opposing fleets logi, for less cost than using dedicated ECM ships). I always thought that FOF missiles was supposed to be one of the effective counters to ECM, but sadly they are rather underpowered & ineffective rendering them some what useless. Can FOF misslies get some love to restore them to be a effective counter to ECM?
With Hardwiring implants, Is there any chance that in the future we could have the option to be able to unplug them & change them, without them being destroyed. That would allow us the flexibilty to be able to change your implants to suit the occassion, ie use what hardwirings you feel are best suited for use with a particular ship and its role, rather than just having to change/destroy your hardwairings and losing isk in the process of trying to field what you feel is the best setup. Of course thou, if you were to be podded, I would still expect that what ever implants & hardwirings you were using would be destroyed. |
Debir Achen
EVE University Ivy League
29
|
Posted - 2012.08.08 06:48:00 -
[192] - Quote
Jade Greenfire wrote:I always thought that FOF missiles was supposed to be one of the effective counters to ECM, but sadly they are rather underpowered & ineffective rendering them some what useless. Are you sure about that? Auto-targeting missiles (to use the new nomenclature) get less base damage, but have their own damage bonus above and beyond the base missile bonus.
The biggest issue I can see is that they are described as auto-target the closest aggressor, which is all very well until you consider what happens when my raven launches auto-targeting cruise missiles at nearby drones rather than the scorpion / blackbird / falcon / cloud of ibises 40km away.
On the subject of market categories, I find it odd that subsystems are sorted first by slot, then by race. IMO, it should be the other way around: if I'm fitting out a Legion, I have no particular interest in the Caldari or Gallente offensive subsystems. Aren't Caldari supposed to have a large signature? |
Civire Desire
MinMatar Mining Manufacturing and Mayhem Wootang Clan
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.08 22:43:00 -
[193] - Quote
Personally, I think the missiles should still be called "FoF", as an acronym for "Fire on Friends." I quit using them, because when I run a site with 2 characters, they tend to shoot the other me...
There have also been cases where my FoF missiles have shot my own drones, who in turn then aggroed ME!
Is it possible that we could pay as much attention to how they work as we are about what they're named? |
Balder Verdandi
Czerka. ESS Empire
65
|
Posted - 2012.08.13 09:28:00 -
[194] - Quote
Perhaps we could get another dev with OCD to fix the inventory issues (75 pages now) or the bug with the tutorial not staying removed from the NeoCom bar?
It would be nice ..... just sayin'.
I don't stab people in the back. -áWhen you do, you miss the look on their face and that's priceless.
Long live the failure known as "Unified Inventory"! |
Jahpahjay
Forgotten Union of Knackered Tradesfolk New Terran Colonial Confederation
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 03:29:00 -
[195] - Quote
I'd like to point out something that I'm surprised hasn't bothered anyone else to my knowledge: Heavy Neutron Blaster is a medium gun while Neutron Blaster is a large gun...
Am I the only one who sees that as being backwards? |
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
308
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 17:19:00 -
[196] - Quote
Jahpahjay wrote:I'd like to point out something that I'm surprised hasn't bothered anyone else to my knowledge: Heavy Neutron Blaster is a medium gun while Neutron Blaster is a large gun...
Am I the only one who sees that as being backwards? Yes, but this is a dangerous topic to bring up as CCP will come up with yet another naming scheme that makes just as little sense.
Sometimes, the quirks of EVE are OK to leave in-place.
284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |
Tess La'Coil
Lightbringer's Sanctuary RAZOR Alliance
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 09:09:00 -
[197] - Quote
Widow still says to have a bonus to Siege and Cruise missile launchers. Someone once said I was a muppet. If that's so, I'm quite sure the Swedish Chef is my brother.-á |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
406
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 11:06:00 -
[198] - Quote
Jahpahjay wrote:I'd like to point out something that I'm surprised hasn't bothered anyone else to my knowledge: Heavy Neutron Blaster is a medium gun while Neutron Blaster is a large gun...
Am I the only one who sees that as being backwards?
Nope. :) Content Designer | Team Five 0 @regnerBA |
|
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
406
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 11:08:00 -
[199] - Quote
Hakaru Ishiwara wrote:Jahpahjay wrote:I'd like to point out something that I'm surprised hasn't bothered anyone else to my knowledge: Heavy Neutron Blaster is a medium gun while Neutron Blaster is a large gun...
Am I the only one who sees that as being backwards? Yes, but this is a dangerous topic to bring up as CCP will come up with yet another naming scheme that makes just as little sense. Sometimes, the quirks of EVE are OK to leave in-place.
My first pass through launcher names was just trying to make them consistent with that they were already supposed to be. Before touching them more we are working to come up with a naming convention that is sane. You can take a look at this thread here to see the ongoing discussion about this exact topic: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=143981 Content Designer | Team Five 0 @regnerBA |
|
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
406
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 11:12:00 -
[200] - Quote
Tess La'Coil wrote:Widow still says to have a bonus to Siege and Cruise missile launchers.
I changed FOF and Assault missiles, didn't touch Torpedoes or Cruise missiles, or their launchers. Is that not the bonus the Widow gives? Content Designer | Team Five 0 @regnerBA |
|
|
Paul Clancy
Korpu no Byakko Tower of Dark Alliance
21
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 13:36:00 -
[201] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Tess La'Coil wrote:Widow still says to have a bonus to Siege and Cruise missile launchers. I changed FOF and Assault missiles, didn't touch Torpedoes or Cruise missiles, or their launchers. Is that not the bonus the Widow gives?
Yes, I just double checked, Widow' and Scorpion Navy Issue' descriptions refers to siege launchers, while ingame said launchers named as Torpedo. |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
407
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 13:52:00 -
[202] - Quote
Paul Clancy wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Tess La'Coil wrote:Widow still says to have a bonus to Siege and Cruise missile launchers. I changed FOF and Assault missiles, didn't touch Torpedoes or Cruise missiles, or their launchers. Is that not the bonus the Widow gives? Yes, I just double checked, Widow' and Scorpion Navy Issue' descriptions refers to siege launchers, while ingame said launchers named as Torpedo.
Ah yes I see what you mean. Siege launchers no longer exists. Can you do me a favor and bug report it in-game. Feel free to mention me in it and I will try and get it fixed ASAP. Thank you very much for pointing that out. Content Designer | Team Five 0 @regnerBA |
|
Paul Clancy
Korpu no Byakko Tower of Dark Alliance
21
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 14:09:00 -
[203] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Ah yes I see what you mean. Siege launchers no longer exists. Can you do me a favor and bug report it in-game. Feel free to mention me in it and I will try and get it fixed ASAP. Thank you very much for pointing that out.
Sure. BR ID 143335
|
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
407
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 14:15:00 -
[204] - Quote
Paul Clancy wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Ah yes I see what you mean. Siege launchers no longer exists. Can you do me a favor and bug report it in-game. Feel free to mention me in it and I will try and get it fixed ASAP. Thank you very much for pointing that out. Sure. BR ID 143335
Thank you very much! :) Content Designer | Team Five 0 @regnerBA |
|
Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 14:30:00 -
[205] - Quote
Continuing on this. Bugreport 143338. Regarding Lachesis bonus. Put your name in the description FoxFour |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
407
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 14:32:00 -
[206] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Continuing on this. Bugreport 143338. Regarding Lachesis bonus. Put your name in the description FoxFour
Yup, that would also be a bug. Fixing fixing fixing. Well, as soon as I get a few spare minutes. Thank you very much for bringing these up. Content Designer | Team Five 0 @regnerBA |
|
Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 14:48:00 -
[207] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Hannott Thanos wrote:Continuing on this. Bugreport 143338. Regarding Lachesis bonus. Put your name in the description FoxFour Yup, that would also be a bug. Fixing fixing fixing. Well, as soon as I get a few spare minutes. Thank you very much for bringing these up.
Minor, but the Gila says "Assault" instead of "Heavy Assault" in special ability.
Osprey Navy Issue has the same issues as the Lachesis but on both it's bonuses.
Onyx has this issue on its dictor skill bonus.
Cerberus has this issue on it's Assault ship bonus.
Sacrilege has this issue on it's cruiser skill bonus.
|
Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 14:54:00 -
[208] - Quote
Battlecruisers:
Drake has this issue of "assault missiles"
Damnation says "assault missile" in its BC bonus.
Battleship:
Scorpion Navy Issue refers to Siege Launcher.
Widow, same as Navy Scorp |
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
407
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 15:04:00 -
[209] - Quote
You're doing this to me on purpose aren't you. I see what you are doing. Thing is it is working. :(
I have updated the bug report you sent me with that information. Will get it all done at the same time. Content Designer | Team Five 0 @regnerBA |
|
Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
100
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 15:22:00 -
[210] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:You're doing this to me on purpose aren't you. I see what you are doing. Thing is it is working. :(
I have updated the bug report you sent me with that information. Will get it all done at the same time.
Honestly, if you gave me the formatting rules you are using on the ship info pages, I would fix them all myself (I seriously would) to look like the new tier 3 battlecruiser standard with clear and separated bonuses. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |