Originally by: Stitcher

---

For frak's sake, it took millions of years of evolution for that brain to get inside your skull, would it kill you to actually USE the damned thing?

---

Originally by: CCP TomB

---

FIRST!

---

Originally by: Weltact

---

Sounds like an attempt to sell co op gameplay for pve. Except that all you need to do is watch where people come together, and then go in with overkill. Or are those earlier comments of hard caps on participation numbers still valid?

---

Originally by: Xessej

---

Hopefully "sleeper AI" will be improved for this.

To be blunt "sleeper AI" at present is extremely predictable. What makes sleepers challenging isn't their tactics, except for their propensity for targeting drones which is just annoying, but their sheer dps coupled with very high ehp and RR.

Maybe if the new NPC's meaningfully use ewar and nueting that will make these fights challenging and not just exercises in who can build the best RR gang.

---

Quote:

---

Aedun Sole > flying with lyk is like flying a bus filled with 5 year old children

---

Quote:

---

If you complete enough of those objectives and contribute positively over a period of time, you may even get a bonus reward for being a good soldier. Think of it as a "service guarantees citizenship" thing. We want to make sure that there is an incentive to be the number one contributor, so hopefully people are motivated to put in an effort. We'll make sure everyone knows who the top dogs are in all of this, so you can show everyone your veritable e-member.

---

Quote:

---

It was basically an ATM machine if you imagine it had a single button that said "free money" and was surrounded by neon signs reading "PLEASE COME TAKE MY MONEY."

---

Originally by: Mynxee

---

Is shooting at these NPCs going to give a sec status gain?

Will players be able to aid the NPCs directly?

Not really a PVE fan but am lookin forward to the potential collateral profit opportunities the incursion events might provide.

---

Originally by: Meissa Anunthiel

---

What metric is going to be used for the reward thingie?
ie, if I show up in a damnation to boost the shooters, or a logistics to rep them up, will I get a shot at the non-immediate rewards?

---

Originally by: Kerdrak

---

Capital size NPC? please...

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Originally by: Kerdrak

---

Capital size NPC? please...

---

Why stop there? Supercap size NPCs.

---

Quote:

---

Completing objectives will make reaching the end goal easier, so people across several systems will be able to work together and virtually high five each other.

---

Originally by: Camios

---

Edited by: Camios on 23/09/2010 16:49:35

Quote:

---

Completing objectives will make reaching the end goal easier, so people across several systems will be able to work together and virtually high five each other.

---

This thing sounds pretty good. Do you mean that all those people have to work for the common goal at the same time in different solarsystems?

If it works, I hope something like this can be applied to pvp/sov warfare.

---

Originally by: iP0D

---

Just out of curiosity, you are absolutely sure that this will be a complete feature set, and not a half enabled delivery that has to be iterated upon?

---

Originally by: Lumy

---

Do you have some contingency plan in case the people starts rolling over with dozen of super-capitals?

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Originally by: Camios

---

Edited by: Camios on 23/09/2010 16:49:35

Quote:

---

Completing objectives will make reaching the end goal easier, so people across several systems will be able to work together and virtually high five each other.

---

This thing sounds pretty good. Do you mean that all those people have to work for the common goal at the same time in different solarsystems?

If it works, I hope something like this can be applied to pvp/sov warfare.

---

So .. if it turns out to not work as imagined or envisioned, are you saying that it will be provided with support and care as an ongoing process, perhaps even if larger issues occur iterate on it?

That's exactly what I mean!

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Originally by: Meissa Anunthiel

---

What metric is going to be used for the reward thingie?
ie, if I show up in a damnation to boost the shooters, or a logistics to rep them up, will I get a shot at the non-immediate rewards?

---

Yeah, hopefully tying the rewards to objectives will mean that everyone gets a share and opens up for making different roles within a fleet apart from "damage".

---

Originally by: SIEGE RED

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Originally by: Camios

---

Edited by: Camios on 23/09/2010 16:49:35

Quote:

---

Completing objectives will make reaching the end goal easier, so people across several systems will be able to work together and virtually high five each other.

---

This thing sounds pretty good. Do you mean that all those people have to work for the common goal at the same time in different solarsystems?

If it works, I hope something like this can be applied to pvp/sov warfare.

---

That's exactly what I mean!

---

Don't make promises you cnnot keep. A quest system with coop mode around PVE content is hardly iterating on Dominion.

Also, nice way of encouraging supercapital blob warfare Rewards mean nothing, nada, zilch, in comparison to the easyness of using the ships en masse man. Especially in target rich environments.

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Ah no, don't get me wrong, this isn't a sov iteration. I mean you'll be working in several solar systems towards a common goal.

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Originally by: Camios

---

Quote:

---

Completing objectives will make reaching the end goal easier, so people across several systems will be able to work together and virtually high five each other.

---

This thing sounds pretty good. Do you mean that all those people have to work for the common goal at the same time in different solarsystems?

If it works, I hope something like this can be applied to pvp/sov warfare.

---

That's exactly what I mean!

---

Originally by: Marvel Emerald

---

Sleeper AI means no drones. Bye bye Gallente.

---

Originally by: Lumy

---

Do you have some contingency plan in case the people starts rolling over with dozen of super-capitals?

---

Originally by: CCP Ytterbium

---

Originally by: Xessej

---

Hopefully "sleeper AI" will be improved for this.

To be blunt "sleeper AI" at present is extremely predictable. What makes sleepers challenging isn't their tactics, except for their propensity for targeting drones which is just annoying, but their sheer dps coupled with very high ehp and RR.

Maybe if the new NPC's meaningfully use ewar and nueting that will make these fights challenging and not just exercises in who can build the best RR gang.

---

Be careful of what you wish for

---

Originally by: Dacil Arandur

---

Though this sounds great and lots of fun, your careful wording is really really worrying. It's hard not to notice the "hopefullys" in the blog itself and in all of your very guarded and carefully worded replies.

Seriously, this looks really great and I'm excited... but we've been pretty let down in the past when we hear about the new features at this point in the dev cycle and then when we see the "finished" product.

Would you mind listing those things which are "must haves" and which things are "should" or "could" ? I want to know what to reasonably expect before I get my hopes up, as it seems that only the "must haves" ever make it into the feature.

Thanks,
Dacil

---

Originally by: Amarok Tonrar

---

Couple of questions that maybe will be answered in future dev blogs about this?

First, and maybe I missed it, but am I correct in my guess that this will require some sort of probing/scanning? Or will they turn up as beacons on the overview? Basically, how are we going to find the locations?

Second, the original 10/10 complexes, as stated in the dev blog, respawned after downtime, and were pretty much farmed immediantly. That meant for those of us who work and are not able to play around that time, we never got to partake in em except perhaps on the weekends. Thus, it was great when they were reworked to their current state. So the question is, is this new feature going back to that original state? Something for only those who can log in the moment the server comes back up?

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Originally by: Dacil Arandur

---

Though this sounds great and lots of fun, your careful wording is really really worrying. It's hard not to notice the "hopefullys" in the blog itself and in all of your very guarded and carefully worded replies.

Seriously, this looks really great and I'm excited... but we've been pretty let down in the past when we hear about the new features at this point in the dev cycle and then when we see the "finished" product.

Would you mind listing those things which are "must haves" and which things are "should" or "could" ? I want to know what to reasonably expect before I get my hopes up, as it seems that only the "must haves" ever make it into the feature.

Thanks,
Dacil

---

I can't list them, but I can tell you that if our pace continues like this, we'll get deeper into the log than I have with any other team :) This thing is definately going in the right direction.

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Originally by: Amarok Tonrar

---

Couple of questions that maybe will be answered in future dev blogs about this?

First, and maybe I missed it, but am I correct in my guess that this will require some sort of probing/scanning? Or will they turn up as beacons on the overview? Basically, how are we going to find the locations?

Second, the original 10/10 complexes, as stated in the dev blog, respawned after downtime, and were pretty much farmed immediantly. That meant for those of us who work and are not able to play around that time, we never got to partake in em except perhaps on the weekends. Thus, it was great when they were reworked to their current state. So the question is, is this new feature going back to that original state? Something for only those who can log in the moment the server comes back up?

---

There will be no need to scan anything in this feature. When the Sanshas invade, they're not subtle about it.

The feature itself will be dynamic and take a while to run through, so I wouldn't worry about timezones. Plus the respawning is not dependent on downtime.

---

Originally by: Mik Nostrebor

---

3. Eve is like walking in treacle now for sorting stuff out. Having content that requires 50 people to drag Battleships, mods, looters, scanning ships 2-3 jumps for every 1 hour 'mission' will require at least that time in organisation. If you have to move that many jumps every time there is an event/mission then people will find it too challenging and most will give up.

---

Originally by: Mik Nostrebor

---

4. Rewards should still be in isk, LP and items in addition to loot and salv. Adding a new type of LP system for rewards will be like the Wow pvp badge system. In Wow, the main currency (gold) is becoming more and more irrelevant as these rewards become the only things that can give access to the better gear. Luckily for Eve, there is no concept of "soulbound" items except for implants.

---

Originally by: Xessej

---

I'd like to suggest the first Incursion should center on Jita. A couple of dozen Nightmares obliterating people trying to leave 4-4 would be HILARIOUS.

(Maybe if the player base comes up with a big enough "donation"?)

---

Originally by: islador

---

To those of you worried about Sleeper AI killing off your drones, please look into other methods of handling the agro table. Current sleeper AI is quite simple. ECM > RR > Damage, every time, without fail. The only exception is when the system resets the aggro tables and a damage or RR system cycles at the right time for a higher value than an ECM system.

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Originally by: Meissa Anunthiel

---

What metric is going to be used for the reward thingie?
ie, if I show up in a damnation to boost the shooters, or a logistics to rep them up, will I get a shot at the non-immediate rewards?

---

Yeah, hopefully tying the rewards to objectives will mean that everyone gets a share and opens up for making different roles within a fleet apart from "damage".

---

Originally by: Elsa Nietzsche

---

here's to hoping CCP put some thought into the spawns.
rather than 33% HS/33% LS/33% null. they use some kind of smart implementation to spawn more instances in areas where people actually play.
will be such a big waste to see 66% of spawns showing up in places where noone ever goes/does PVE

---

Originally by: SIEGE RED

---

Originally by: Mik Nostrebor

---

4. Rewards should still be in isk, LP and items in addition to loot and salv. Adding a new type of LP system for rewards will be like the Wow pvp badge system. In Wow, the main currency (gold) is becoming more and more irrelevant as these rewards become the only things that can give access to the better gear. Luckily for Eve, there is no concept of "soulbound" items except for implants.

---

Haven't you heard, badge systems and soulbound content is hot, it's in all the keynotes. It makes people think it will attract people used to such systems, even wanting them, regardless of whether you really want those in the sandbox or if they stick around when not following up on things. But hey, the sandbox, like the economy is self correcting! No really, you will see, it is going to be awesome!

---

Quote:

---

what's happening winter 2010?

---

Quote:

---

Team best friends forever

---

Quote:

---

Think of it as a moving circus where you have to shoot the clowns. Stupid clowns.

---

Originally by: CCP Fallout

---

CCP Soundwave outlines some of the changes to PVE that will come with EVE Online: Incursion

---

Originally by: MissyDark

---

Originally by: CCP Fallout

---

CCP Soundwave outlines some of the changes to PVE that will come with EVE Online: Incursion

---

I don't want to bash your contingency expansion that you have to put in place because of incarna not being ready, but sometimes I wish your expansions weren't free. I wonder how would players have voted with their money - for or against the incursion? Do you, CCP?

---

Originally by: LegendaryFrog

---

Do we have a ballpark estimate on how long these will take to complete? My initial concern is that if it is too quick, these will be run through almost immediately and those who were not fortunate enough to be at the right place at the right time will not be able to take part. Is the intention for this to be kind of a lottery effect, or do you intend for it to be such that someone looking to participate in this PvE feature will be able to seek it out and do so at his/her leisure?

Also, with advanced AI, I am hoping that these NPCs will also follow the 'rules' of regular players. EWAR abusing npcs sound much more interesting and fun when they dont have magical "ewar immunity" on themselves, and having the ability to open up all forms of warfare against these npcs could make the PvE fleet compositions far more interesting (fun).

---

Originally by: Ottman

---

does it sound familiar ? plex alone will not gurantee to exclude the isk for rl cash trader, and with every nerf that makes it harder to get iskies ingame you open the nearly shut door again for them. to ignore these relation is not wise, just as general warning, and the general tendence to raise the amount of time needed to finish those plexes with no isk rewards while killing npc's, maybe with t2 ammo, means that the few item rewards will have to earn the iskies for those players doing those plexes.
means in addition more inflation, and we had just one inflation wave with planetary interaction, the next one must not really hit us or what do you say ?

---

Originally by: Ottman

---

bringing in sleeper ai means also that player not only loose ships, they get podded by npc now too, another thing not mentioned in the dev blog, it means you risk all and its not sure that you get your reward, and it shows where the general tendence goes to.

---

Originally by: Ottman

---

paying for the account, paying for gtc to convert them into plex to be able to buy ships and stuff needed to fly those plexes, flying them, loosing ships, getting podded and then you need to buy next gtc with real life cash again if you want to get quick isk again. the only who earns cash that way is ccp for the case if you are a pure pew pew pilot.
it must ofc not be like this, but right now it smells like this for me. the only response i will read tbh is with ccp tag, the rest about flaming and trolling... i dont care, those ppl suck from default and are not worth my attention, tbh :P .

---

Originally by: youthink

---

Now, imagine an incursion event in a moderately occupied system/constellation. Let me hazard a guess and say 50 Sansha ships appear. Let's say it's high sec and some 50 players join in. That's 100 ships on grid to start with, plus drones. Now imagine some clown shooting other players at the site. Let's say he manages to hit five ships/drones with a Smart Bomb. How many Concord ships will be spawned? snip

---

Originally by: Tres FarmerCan those Sansha put up cynojammers once they land in a system?
This way everybody has to walk to the party in BS maximum instead of taking the private jet (SuperCap), if you know what I mean?! [8)

---

---

Quote:

---

Think of it as a moving circus where you have to shoot the clowns."

---

Quote:

---

another thing not mentioned in the dev blog, it means you risk all and its not sure that you get your reward, and it shows where the general tendence goes to

---

Quote:

---

Ok am I the only who thinks we could have had co-op missions in hi sec a long time ago except someone in their infinite "wisdom" decided to put all the lvl 5 agents in low sec. I know when everyeone first heard about lvl 5's and the need for co-op we were excited. Then we found out they were all low sec and said a collective WTF?! If you want to really create more co-op move the lvl 5's to hi sec or at least put some in hi sec.

---

Quote:

---

Everyone, this is CCP we're talking about. For those forgetting past expansions please take a look at Faction Failure, the drama lag that's been unleashed and the latest WH fiasco. I am fully confident CCP will totally mess this up, by creating a system in which this PVE 'battleground' will be dominated by massive cap blobs. They claim the more people are involved the less rewarding it will be but it'll get exploited heavily, before it's disabled/removed.

I, once upon a time, was an optimist and thought CCP would do things right. Now I know that this is CCP we're talking about

---

Quote:

---

Surprised noone has mentioned the similarity between the cooperative aspects of this system and Warhammer's public quests.

---

Originally by: CCP Fallout

---

CCP Soundwave outlines some of the changes to PVE that will come with EVE Online: Incursion in his newest dev blog.

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

Originally by: Amarok Tonrar

---

Couple of questions that maybe will be answered in future dev blogs about this?

First, and maybe I missed it, but am I correct in my guess that this will require some sort of probing/scanning? Or will they turn up as beacons on the overview? Basically, how are we going to find the locations?

Second, the original 10/10 complexes, as stated in the dev blog, respawned after downtime, and were pretty much farmed immediantly. That meant for those of us who work and are not able to play around that time, we never got to partake in em except perhaps on the weekends. Thus, it was great when they were reworked to their current state. So the question is, is this new feature going back to that original state? Something for only those who can log in the moment the server comes back up?

---

There will be no need to scan anything in this feature. When the Sanshas invade, they're not subtle about it.

The feature itself will be dynamic and take a while to run through, so I wouldn't worry about timezones. Plus the respawning is not dependent on downtime.

---

Originally by: Amarok Tonrar

---

While I think a lot of these posts are just blowing smoke, I can totally agree on the epicness this could be.

Picture this. Pilots goin about their business in Jita as usual, freighters and haulers and all sorts of ships coming and going, when suddenly a wormhole appears 150km from the station and a Sansha mothership comes through (what is a mothership btw? could it be possibly like a traveling station? A deathstar type thing?) Imagine all the carebear freighters scrambling for cover. Docking manager Scotty under such load that people are being told to stand by as Sansha ships are launched and are now bearing down on the station. At the same time, other major trade hubs are hit in all four of the empires.

Now THAT would be one hell of a Sansha invasion and would definitly stir up the sometimes rather mundane activities of high sec.

Just don't do it while it's me undocking in my freighter.

---

Originally by: Deva Blackfire

---

Edited by: Deva Blackfire on 24/09/2010 16:24:46
Any ship type limits? Or will you just jump 1-2 remote sebo/tracking titans (or few motherships) and be done with it without any risk?

[126]
Stop crying and go farm your jew-moongold. Or would you prefer to remove moon income and turn it back into static plexes? No? I guessed so.

---

Originally by: Infinion

---

Also there is never no risk. Im going to enjoy watching videos of carebear fit titans and moms getting hotdropped by cap fleets

---

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

There are no mechanics to take sides in currently, [..]

---

Originally by: Che Biko

---

Edited by: Che Biko on 24/09/2010 19:24:43

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

There are no mechanics to take sides in currently, [..]

---

Can't we at least have something like NPC ships attacking Nation space in 0.0, or NPC ships attacking nation complexes and base spawns in empire, or even NPC ships fighting the Sansha ships in the same event? Players on both sides try to eliminate the other side's NPC's, or something like that?
It's not a perfect solution, but something like that would be relatively easy to implement in the meantime I guess?

It's seems a bit unfair to not be able to enjoy the purpose of this (player teaming up vs NPC) if you happen to support the Nation team.

---

Originally by: CCP Dropbear

---

What Soundwave means there is that there's no "opt-in" mechanics for "sides" to choose, such as you get in Faction Warfare. It's still possible, despite this, for Sansha sympathisers (or local pirates, etc) to run interference. Right now though, the extent to which they can is limited in scope. If there's the time to, we'll try and broaden that.

---

Originally by: Terra Mikael

---

This will likely be the most underwhelming expansion since tyrannis.

---

Originally by: CCP Dropbear

---

It's still possible, despite this, for Sansha sympathisers (or local pirates, etc) to run interference. Right now though, the extent to which they can is limited in scope. If there's the time to, we'll try and broaden that.

---

Quote:

---

Think of it as a moving circus where you have to shoot the clowns. Stupid clowns. You will be able to find them in all areas of space, high sec, low sec and zero sec, with the appropriate reward multipliers depending on where it is of course.

---

Originally by: Aria Jenneth

---

So, the worst expansion since the last one? Funny, I've sort of been having fun with it.

---

Originally by: Adrian Schultze

---

As long as there are still options around to make a ship unprobeable in space while doing a mission, this idea is totally stupid. As soon as possible you will have unprobeable carebear gangs everywhere......

---

Originally by: John McCreedy

---

I know it's early days yet but is Incursion going to be only PvE content or will the be other cool stuff for those of us who prefer shooting real people in the face?

---

Originally by: CCP Dropbear

---

Originally by: Che Biko

---

Edited by: Che Biko on 24/09/2010 19:24:43

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

There are no mechanics to take sides in currently, [..]

---

Can't we at least have something like NPC ships attacking Nation space in 0.0, or NPC ships attacking nation complexes and base spawns in empire, or even NPC ships fighting the Sansha ships in the same event? Players on both sides try to eliminate the other side's NPC's, or something like that?
It's not a perfect solution, but something like that would be relatively easy to implement in the meantime I guess?

It's seems a bit unfair to not be able to enjoy the purpose of this (player teaming up vs NPC) if you happen to support the Nation team.

---

What Soundwave means there is that there's no "opt-in" mechanics for "sides" to choose, such as you get in Faction Warfare. It's still possible, despite this, for Sansha sympathisers (or local pirates, etc) to run interference. Right now though, the extent to which they can is limited in scope. If there's the time to, we'll try and broaden that.

---

Originally by: Matalino

---

Originally by: John McCreedy

---

I know it's early days yet but is Incursion going to be only PvE content or will the be other cool stuff for those of us who prefer shooting real people in the face?

---

Does a Faction mothership and fighterbomber count? Specific details are pending, but it is on the list of features.

---

Originally by: Sarge Tigershark

---

if they force me to join a corp to run level 4 missions and/or if they nerf the level 4 mish income and/or if i will have to travel all around systems to complete an objective for some few isk reward i ll quit eve.
can someone tell me are they changing high sec agent missions ?

---

Originally by: Katarin Savage

---

AND DONT FORGET: not everyone as an alliance or many friends they can call on to help defeat a fleet-sized battle...

I lost my best mega recently koz no one came to help me and I got blatted by just three other BS pirates, so please make sure them new 'Sleeper Ai' dont 'overkill' us for a poxy one meg reward like wot happened to me last week!!!

soem us like playing solo and I wouldnt want to see this ruin PvE for us if we get sucked into this 'new' mishon engine alone and without backup...

If fact, why cant I just buy some NPC friends to help out if we need them like we used to do in Dungeons and Dragons and all the other role-playing games of times lost forever????

guess I'd have to wait another two years b4 I get some help!!!

---

Originally by: John McCreedy

---

No, not really. A Faction Mothership will be the Eve equivalent to the Bugatti Veyron, accessible only to the super-rich, not for mere mortals who will never be able to afford one.

---

Quote:

---

you'll probably remember the static 10/10 complexes

---

Quote:

---

Now you may be asking yourself "why did you take them out then, stupid?" The high reward and static nature meant that you could make a lot of money every day at a pretty small effort. It was basically an ATM machine if you imagine it had a single button that said "free money" and was surrounded by neon signs reading "PLEASE COME TAKE MY MONEY."

---

Originally by: Tres Farmer

---

Can those Sansha put up cynojammers once they land in a system?

---

Originally by: CCP Dropbear

---

What Soundwave means there is that there's no "opt-in" mechanics for "sides" to choose, such as you get in Faction Warfare. It's still possible, despite this, for Sansha sympathisers (or local pirates, etc) to run interference. Right now though, the extent to which they can is limited in scope. If there's the time to, we'll try and broaden that.

---

Originally by: Aramis Defranzac

---

I'm hoping this feature is a true to the PVE players where this content shouldn't just be a focus on what else those in 0.0 can do and receive, but also for those who like the security of high sec and want to see more content :).

---

Originally by: CCP Dropbear

---

Originally by: Che Biko

---

Edited by: Che Biko on 24/09/2010 19:24:43

Originally by: CCP Soundwave

---

There are no mechanics to take sides in currently, [..]

---

Can't we at least have something like NPC ships attacking Nation space in 0.0, or NPC ships attacking nation complexes and base spawns in empire, or even NPC ships fighting the Sansha ships in the same event? Players on both sides try to eliminate the other side's NPC's, or something like that?
It's not a perfect solution, but something like that would be relatively easy to implement in the meantime I guess?

It's seems a bit unfair to not be able to enjoy the purpose of this (player teaming up vs NPC) if you happen to support the Nation team.

---

What Soundwave means there is that there's no "opt-in" mechanics for "sides" to choose, such as you get in Faction Warfare. It's still possible, despite this, for Sansha sympathisers (or local pirates, etc) to run interference. Right now though, the extent to which they can is limited in scope. If there's the time to, we'll try and broaden that.

---

Originally by: Jagga Spikes

---

quote: "...Think of it as a moving circus where you have to shoot the clowns."

that's just epic. :) tho, i'd really like to see an option to play as clown. just for principle of choice, if anything.

---

Originally by: Camios

---

Sansha should at least try to place SBUs and shoot Ihubs, outposts and TCUs (lol).

---

Originally by: Mynxee

---

Originally by: Aramis Defranzac

---

I'm hoping this feature is a true to the PVE players where this content shouldn't just be a focus on what else those in 0.0 can do and receive, but also for those who like the security of high sec and want to see more content :).

---

It would be disappointing -- and imho out of character for New Eden -- if the juiciest rewards of an invasion were plopped down right where there is the least risk to acquire them.

---

Originally by: corebloodbrothers

---

on a more serieus note,
i am curious about the reward system. ATM i often find tags, where as a tag from 1 race or bad guy can be worth 10 mill a pop, and the other of the same rank of another race is worth 0 isk. This unbalance doesnt help making things balanced.

Same would aply to other tags liek faction tags and officer tags. cash them in for LP or anything with loyalty and a equal reward over the different races and factions we all love in eve. Therefor giving PVE over races the same attraction in rewards.

---

Originally by: Mynxee

---

Originally by: Aramis Defranzac

---

I'm hoping this feature is a true to the PVE players where this content shouldn't just be a focus on what else those in 0.0 can do and receive, but also for those who like the security of high sec and want to see more content :).

---

It would be disappointing -- and imho out of character for New Eden -- if the juiciest rewards of an invasion were plopped down right where there is the least risk to acquire them.

---

Originally by: Aramis Defranzac

---

If I missed this I apologize but does this mean that if the event takes place in High Sec then there will not be a Mothership Spawn and the reward is less than in low sec or 0.0?

I'm hoping this feature is a true to the PVE players where this content shouldn't just be a focus on what else those in 0.0 can do and receive, but also for those who like the security of high sec and want to see more content :).

---

Originally by: Deva Blackfire

---

Originally by: Mynxee

---

Originally by: Aramis Defranzac

---

I'm hoping this feature is a true to the PVE players where this content shouldn't just be a focus on what else those in 0.0 can do and receive, but also for those who like the security of high sec and want to see more content :).

---

It would be disappointing -- and imho out of character for New Eden -- if the juiciest rewards of an invasion were plopped down right where there is the least risk to acquire them.

---

IIRC you cant blob PvE with supercaps in hisec.

---

Originally by: Mynxee

---

Originally by: Deva Blackfire

---

Originally by: Mynxee

---

Originally by: Aramis Defranzac

---

I'm hoping this feature is a true to the PVE players where this content shouldn't just be a focus on what else those in 0.0 can do and receive, but also for those who like the security of high sec and want to see more content :).

---

It would be disappointing -- and imho out of character for New Eden -- if the juiciest rewards of an invasion were plopped down right where there is the least risk to acquire them.

---

IIRC you cant blob PvE with supercaps in hisec.

---

I meant risk from other players, not from the NPCs themselves.

---

Originally by: Mynxee

---

It's a suggestion that CSM made at the June Summit when Soundwave discussed this feature with us and mentioned it was still in the "drawing board" stage. Too bad it didn't get slotted in. I would very much like to see a way for sympathizers to support the Sansha...it would make the encounters a lot more unpredictable for everyone--but especially the players who choose to oppose the invasion.

---

Originally by: Naomi Wildfire

---

Quote:

---

Think of it as a moving circus where you have to shoot the clowns. Stupid clowns. You will be able to find them in all areas of space, high sec, low sec and zero sec, with the appropriate reward multipliers depending on where it is of course.

---

IT alliance is going on a long time journey?

---

Originally by: Efraya

---

Time to download that 3gb~ update for sisi again :S

---