Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1031
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 10:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
Yes,
it's time to curbstomp AFK activities, inflation, botting and blitzing, and expose the revenue streams to PVP. Replace all NPC bounties with lootable tags, that can be sold to NPC buy orders. Same goes to LP, no automatic, ungankable payouts anymore anywhere in New Eden.
Combine this with rat AI revamp and the removal of L4s from hisec, and EVE economy is back on track again.
Have a nice weekend!
Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
2568
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 10:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'd rather have bounties and LP. Having to loot every wreck for tags in order to make an income is boring as ****. |

Kiandoshia
Gnampf Inc.
141
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 10:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fine by me, as long as we can get the old inventory management system back =p |

Lyskal Oskold
Sefem Velox Swift Angels Alliance
1476
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 10:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Does make sense. I approve. AFKers bug me and make FW turn into a carebear fest... Pirates are red, buddies are blue, if you're unlucky enough to be orange, I'll f*cking kill you.I wonder if all the pickles in the forums are tax exempt? |

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone Caldari State
646
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 10:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Another play it my way thread or nerf the hell out of Eve LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!-á |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1031
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 10:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:I'd rather have bounties and LP. Having to loot every wreck for tags in order to make an income is boring as ****.
Salvaging is about 400% more interesting than shooting rats.
People in wormholes already loot & salvage everything, and never complain- because having your income in a tangible form, exposed to hostiles actually adds interesting gameplay.
Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
436
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:05:00 -
[7] - Quote
No "This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1693
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Roime wrote:Combine this with rat AI revamp and the removal of L4s and incursions from hisec, and EVE economy is back on track again.
ftfy EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

gobbybobby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
Shameless Avenger wrote:No
why not? Explain? |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1033
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:07:00 -
[10] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Roime wrote:Combine this with rat AI revamp and the removal of L4s and incursions from hisec, and EVE economy is back on track again. ftfy
Ty!
I forgot about Incursions, because that Nefarious guy said CPP KILLED off all Incursion communities!!111
Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |
|

Antal Jozsef
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:08:00 -
[11] - Quote
This would be very good, bump. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1693
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Roime wrote:Ty!
I forgot about Incursions, because that Nefarious guy said CPP KILLED off all Incursion communities!!111
no they just put a bullet straight through the skull of easy-mode vanguard blitzing which drove away a lot of the dudes in it for the "easy" aspect EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
489
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:09:00 -
[13] - Quote
This post makes sense, you know how we are always trying to switch from wireless technologies to wired technologies with massive physical requirements?
Just the other day I was talking to my buddy Joe, and we changed his cell-phone out for a VOIP router and 1,600 ft of cable on a spool.
....
The CORRECT course of action would be to remove tags all together, and make LP a market commodity.
If you need a friend call me @ (501) 444-CCNA |

Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
113
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
To kick start eve CCP would need to remove level4's from high sec and remove T2BPO, they will do neither because they are terrified of the initial unsubs that would cause so instead EVE online will die the slow way seeing a slow downfall of subscriptions each passing month. Kugutsumen - My signature insures that my post is always read by an ISD or Dev, does yours? |

Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
204
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
No. A better idea is to shift the in-game currency to Rings of Jordan ... Or maybe it's better to leave the game alone for a while.
|

TotalRapeage
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:11:00 -
[16] - Quote
Roime wrote:Yes,
it's time to curbstomp AFK activities, inflation, botting and blitzing, and expose the revenue streams to PVP. Replace all NPC bounties with lootable tags, that can be sold to NPC buy orders. Same goes to LP, no automatic, ungankable payouts anymore anywhere in New Eden.
Combine this with rat AI revamp and the removal of L4s from hisec, and EVE economy is back on track again.
Have a nice weekend!
Drone regions didn't have bounties until just recently and it was still bots galore out there. How's your suggestion propose to handle all the jita station traders who make isk risk free? |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1693
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:12:00 -
[17] - Quote
TotalRapeage wrote:Drone regions didn't have bounties until just recently and it was still bots galore out there. How's your suggestion propose to handle all the jita station traders who make isk risk free?
There's no risk in trading? What? EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1033
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:23:00 -
[18] - Quote
TotalRapeage wrote: Drone regions didn't have bounties until just recently and it was still bots galore out there. How's your suggestion propose to handle all the jita station traders who make isk risk free?
You are correct, the bounty removal by itself (like any other single measure) is not enough to curb botting, and it's not likely that bots can ever be removed from computer games in general. But changes to rat AI along with the requirement to haul your "proof of kills" to the markets could help a bit.
I'd also like to see more alternatives to ratting-based income making in EVE.
As what comes to trading, I've lost billions on the markets, way more than in PVE ever. Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |

Sarik Olecar
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
112
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:43:00 -
[19] - Quote
You're dumb. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1034
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:50:00 -
[20] - Quote
And you are in need of hugs. Here, have a warm, long hug <3
Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |
|

pussnheels
534
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:53:00 -
[21] - Quote
None of you who agreed can t give a solid answer on why people shouldn t be allowed to play this game semi AFK I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1034
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:56:00 -
[22] - Quote
Perhaps you can seek the answer via the question- why should people play this game at the keyboard?
Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
307
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 11:57:00 -
[23] - Quote
Roime wrote:Yes,
it's time to curbstomp AFK activities, inflation, botting and blitzing, and expose the revenue streams to PVP. Replace all NPC bounties with lootable tags, that can be sold to NPC buy orders. Same goes to LP, no automatic, ungankable payouts anymore anywhere in New Eden.
Combine this with rat AI revamp and the removal of L4s from hisec, and EVE economy is back on track again.
Have a nice weekend!
this is an awesome idea!
in fact, the only source of ISK should be insurance payouts. I'm a NPC corp alt, any argument I make is invalid. |

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
436
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 12:00:00 -
[24] - Quote
gobbybobby wrote:Shameless Avenger wrote:No why not? Explain?
You want to replace all bounties with NPC tags that need to be looted. Do you have any idea how long it takes to loot a field on a slow battleship? With one wreck 90km away, flying at 25O, that's 6 minutes just to fly to ONE wreck. And you want to keep people from going AFK?
"This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1034
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 12:03:00 -
[25] - Quote
Maybe you should fit officer salvagers on that CNR?
Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 12:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
No. Go back to PvP while I make my billions in safety. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1034
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 12:27:00 -
[27] - Quote
I envy your L4 billions. I really do! I wish I could have as much fun and ISK in EVE. Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |

Xaeltis
Bio-Tech Research Luna Sanguinem
5
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 12:43:00 -
[28] - Quote
You sound mad. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 12:46:00 -
[29] - Quote
Roime wrote:I envy your L4 billions. I really do! I wish I could have as much fun and ISK in EVE.
Stop PvPing and you will. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
251
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 12:50:00 -
[30] - Quote
Roime wrote:TotalRapeage wrote: Drone regions didn't have bounties until just recently and it was still bots galore out there. How's your suggestion propose to handle all the jita station traders who make isk risk free?
You are correct, the bounty removal by itself (like any other single measure) is not enough to curb botting, and it's not likely that bots can ever be removed from computer games in general. But changes to rat AI along with the requirement to haul your "proof of kills" to the markets could help a bit. I'd also like to see more alternatives to ratting-based income making in EVE. As what comes to trading, I've lost billions on the markets, way more than in PVE ever.
So, you want to hammer the hell out of PVE income generation, and you just stated that trading is not the easy mode of generation ISK.
Precisely then, how do YOU make your ISK to fund your PvP activities and such.
|
|

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 12:52:00 -
[31] - Quote
Probably ransoms and scummy pirate methods. |

Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
Definately no, and leave L4 missions in high-sec.
If I'm afk I'm always in a station, but looting tag, that would just be more crap to loot.
Sounds to me all you're really trying to do is make high-sec crappy enough that nobody wants to be there. Except as the game is that won't happen, if high-sec gets too crappy they won't move to low-sec or 0.0 they'll just leave the game. |

Abel Merkabah
The Executioners Capital Punishment.
92
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:03:00 -
[33] - Quote
Urgg Boolean wrote:No. A better idea is to shift the in-game currency to Rings of Jordan ... Or maybe it's better to leave the game alone for a while.
WTS Rifter 1 HR! "The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds, given adequate vacuuming systems." |

Halcyon Ingenium
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
160
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:04:00 -
[34] - Quote
Roime wrote:Yes,
it's time to curbstomp AFK activities, inflation, botting and blitzing, and expose the revenue streams to PVP. Replace all NPC bounties with lootable tags, that can be sold to NPC buy orders. Same goes to LP, no automatic, ungankable payouts anymore anywhere in New Eden.
Combine this with rat AI revamp and the removal of L4s from hisec, and EVE economy is back on track again.
Have a nice weekend!
Well, at least he didn't preface this moronic crap with a "we" statement.
They say that in learning the game Go, it is best to lose your first 50 games as soon as possible. This is because Go is complex, and the only way you will start to get an idea of strategy and play is by first sucking and failing as hard as you can. So...In EVE, it is best to get your first 50 deaths by combat as soon as possible. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4288
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:10:00 -
[35] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Stop PvPing and you will.
Okay we'll quit PvPing and you can go find buyers for your deadspace loot, LP store items or ores when nobody is shopping for any of those things because they're not getting blown up. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1036
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:11:00 -
[36] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
So, you want to hammer the hell out of PVE income generation, and you just stated that trading is not the easy mode of generation ISK.
Precisely then, how do YOU make your ISK to fund your PvP activities and such.
I had to reread my posts, and still can't see where I said I want to hammer the hell out of anything? I'd like to decrease the ATM-like nature of current PVE, not decrease the actual profits. About trading I only echoed Richard's statement that trading is hardly risk-free.
And since you asked, by long-term investments using capital I accumulated during my active trading period(s). I also run a wh PI setup (most of that I feed now to corp wallet to buy ice products). I used to explore a lot but mostly for entertainment, now pretty much the only PVE I do is sleeper sites, and only because I want to give my corp members fun, regular and involving means of income generation, and I use my share to fund my corp's monthly award program.
Guess that answers Anslo's petty trolling as well.
Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |

Rats
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
131
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:14:00 -
[37] - Quote
Roime wrote:Destination SkillQueue wrote:I'd rather have bounties and LP. Having to loot every wreck for tags in order to make an income is boring as ****. Salvaging is about 400% more interesting than shooting rats. People in wormholes already loot & salvage everything, and never complain- because having your income in a tangible form, exposed to hostiles actually adds interesting gameplay.
Well it used to be when decent loot would occasionally drop ....
These days ....
Tal
-áI Fought the Law, and the Law Won... -áTalon Silverhawk-á |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
477
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:21:00 -
[38] - Quote
I agree with this, but leave L4s in high-sec; ninja-looting is a lot of fun and would be even more fun under this proposal. Nothing Found |

Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:22:00 -
[39] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:I agree with this, but leave L4s in high-sec; ninja-looting is a lot of fun and would be even more fun under this proposal.
And that's probably the best reason for leaving it as it is. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
477
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:24:00 -
[40] - Quote
Sabrina Solette wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:I agree with this, but leave L4s in high-sec; ninja-looting is a lot of fun and would be even more fun under this proposal. And that's probably the best reason for leaving it as it is. Please explain. Nothing Found |
|

Goremageddon Box
Guerrilla Flotilla
384
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:28:00 -
[41] - Quote
Tom Gerard wrote:This post makes sense, you know how we are always trying to switch from wireless technologies to wired technologies with massive physical requirements?
Just the other day I was talking to my buddy Joe, and we changed his cell-phone out for a VOIP router and 1,600 ft of cable on a spool.
....
The CORRECT course of action would be to remove tags all together, and make LP a market commodity.
wireless is garbage. reliability and ease of hackers getting your ****.
also this thread is GARBAGE.
**** no. i would unsub in a heartbeat. |

Jonah Gravenstein
723
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:31:00 -
[42] - Quote
Roime wrote:Yes,
it's time to curbstomp AFK activities, inflation, botting and blitzing, and expose the revenue streams to PVP. Replace all NPC bounties with lootable tags, that can be sold to NPC buy orders. Same goes to LP, no automatic, ungankable payouts anymore anywhere in New Eden.
Combine this with rat AI revamp and the removal of L4s from hisec, and EVE economy is back on track again.
Have a nice weekend!
While I agree with the need to stomp all over the bots, replacing the NPC bounties with tags to be sold to NPC buy orders would be a step backwards with regards to a player run economy, LP I believe is a primary source of faction ammo (at least that's where a lot of my LP goes). L4 missions should be available in hisec, although an AI revamp to sleeper or incursion levels will certainly make them a lot more entertaining and increase risk which would remove the blitzing/afk tactics that some players use. Fits would change, people would lose ships and tears would be collected. Familiarity with the concept of their ships assploding may also encourage people to indulge in PvP.
L1-3 missions are fine, leave their AI as is, we don't want players who are still relatively new being discouraged from playing by being wtfpwned by NPCs in what is supposed to be relatively safe space
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:32:00 -
[43] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Sabrina Solette wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:I agree with this, but leave L4s in high-sec; ninja-looting is a lot of fun and would be even more fun under this proposal. And that's probably the best reason for leaving it as it is. Please explain.
As it stands ninja salvagers get away with loot and salvage quite often virtually with no risk in most cases. The proposal you agree with means the missioner would get nothing for their trouble other than the mission reward, they might not even get that if it requires an item that the ninja salvager looted first.
But of course I did not need to tell you that as you already knew hence the more fun for you comment. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
251
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:38:00 -
[44] - Quote
Roime wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
So, you want to hammer the hell out of PVE income generation, and you just stated that trading is not the easy mode of generation ISK.
Precisely then, how do YOU make your ISK to fund your PvP activities and such.
I had to reread my posts, and still can't see where I said I want to hammer the hell out of anything? I'd like to decrease the ATM-like nature of current PVE, not decrease the actual profits. About trading I only echoed Richard's statement that trading is hardly risk-free. And since you asked, by long-term investments using capital I accumulated during my active trading period(s). I also run a wh PI setup (most of that I feed now to corp wallet to buy ice products). I used to explore a lot but mostly for entertainment, now pretty much the only PVE I do is sleeper sites, and only because I want to give my corp members fun, regular and involving means of income generation, and I use my share to fund my corp's monthly award program. Guess that answers Anslo's petty trolling as well.
1. By converting bounties into lootable tags, you dramatically increase the time required to acquire the bounties. Looting and then flying to NPC buyers takes time. Time = money. And that does not even begin to touch the potential of someone getting ganked with a hold full of tags.
2. You stated that you want L4's removed from high sec. Kind of destroys PvE ISK generation right there, in a big big way.
As for you methods of generating ISK, sorry, most people can't do that, or don't have the time to do it. I lived in wh's for a long time, and am fully aware of the time commitment required for a successful Sleeper op. Many people do not have the ability to block off a contiguous chunk of time to run in a sleeper op, or an incursion op.
L4's are their only source of decent income..
This thread is simply yet another "nerf hi-sec thread". |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
477
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:43:00 -
[45] - Quote
Sabrina Solette wrote:As it stands ninja salvagers get away with loot and salvage quite often virtually with no risk in most cases. The proposal you agree with means the missioner would get nothing for their trouble other than the mission reward, they might not even get that if it requires an item that the ninja salvager looted first. High-sec ninja-looting is low risk because :carebears:. Would you agree that the proposed changes give more incentive to protect your loot and possibly work with a team for greater rewards? Nothing Found |

Bunnie Hop
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
345
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:49:00 -
[46] - Quote
The myriad of idiotic ideas from the low-null sec muppets aimed at destroying hi sec is amazing. Destroy hi sec and you destroy eve, take the tin foil off and get it thru your heads. |

Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 13:54:00 -
[47] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Sabrina Solette wrote:As it stands ninja salvagers get away with loot and salvage quite often virtually with no risk in most cases. The proposal you agree with means the missioner would get nothing for their trouble other than the mission reward, they might not even get that if it requires an item that the ninja salvager looted first. High-sec ninja-looting is low risk because :carebears:. Would you agree that the proposed changes give more incentive to protect your loot and possibly work with a team for greater rewards?
No I don't agree, because that's not how high-sec works in general. There's a lot of high-sec players in NPC corps, they're effectively solo players with a chat line.
That propasal would just give you more loot and cause more grief to the other player for no more effort on your part which is why you consider it fun.
The greater rewards you refer to are not isk and what you may consider a reward someone else may not. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
477
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:09:00 -
[48] - Quote
Sabrina Solette wrote:That propasal would just give you more loot and cause more grief to the other player for no more effort on your part It could be a very hazardous job if people had incentive to defend their loot... In wormholes, for instance, you run the risk of losing your ship and the loot.
Sabrina Solette wrote:which is why you consider it fun. I actually find ninja-looting fun because of the implied risk rather than for some abstract "tears" (although watching idiots rage in local is pretty funny), but it becomes more boring the more I realize no one is really ready to defend their loot. I think this change would be better overall. Nothing Found |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4288
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:15:00 -
[49] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:The myriad of idiotic ideas from the low-null sec muppets aimed at destroying hi sec is amazing. Destroy hi sec and you destroy eve, take the tin foil off and get it thru your heads.
hi uh this proposal would have the same effects on anomalies "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:21:00 -
[50] - Quote
Andski wrote:Anslo wrote:Stop PvPing and you will. Okay we'll quit PvPing and you can go find buyers for your deadspace loot, LP store items or ores when nobody is shopping for any of those things because they're not getting blown up.
Fine by me. |
|

Goremageddon Box
Guerrilla Flotilla
401
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:23:00 -
[51] - Quote
I'd like to reiterate my big NO.
|

Kinis Deren
EVE University Ivy League
65
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:25:00 -
[52] - Quote
I agree with OP - remove bounties and sec gain from all sov null ratting activities and switch the reward to worthless lootable tags instead!  |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4288
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:31:00 -
[53] - Quote
Kinis Deren wrote:I agree with OP - remove bounties and sec gain from all sov null ratting activities and switch the reward to worthless lootable tags instead! 
i guess you also agree with the OP on the whole "remove l4s and incursions from hisec" part "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Goremageddon Box
Guerrilla Flotilla
408
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:32:00 -
[54] - Quote
wouldnt a better way just be that ccp sends a jove ship to afk people after an hour of sitting in space? |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:34:00 -
[55] - Quote
Andski wrote:Kinis Deren wrote:I agree with OP - remove bounties and sec gain from all sov null ratting activities and switch the reward to worthless lootable tags instead!  i guess you also agree with the OP on the whole "remove l4s and incursions from hisec" part
If we get screwed, so do you goon stooge. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
477
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:35:00 -
[56] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Andski wrote:Kinis Deren wrote:I agree with OP - remove bounties and sec gain from all sov null ratting activities and switch the reward to worthless lootable tags instead!  i guess you also agree with the OP on the whole "remove l4s and incursions from hisec" part If we get screwed, so do you goon stooge. These are hard words from a hard man. Nothing Found |

Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:35:00 -
[57] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Sabrina Solette wrote:That propasal would just give you more loot and cause more grief to the other player for no more effort on your part It could be a very hazardous job if people had incentive to defend their loot... In wormholes, for instance, you run the risk of losing your ship and the loot. Sabrina Solette wrote:which is why you consider it fun. I actually find ninja-looting fun because of the implied risk rather than for some abstract "tears" (although watching idiots rage in local is pretty funny), but it becomes more boring the more I realize no one is really ready to defend their loot. I think this change would be better overall.
Ninja salvagers will go where they can get the max profit with the least risk, which is why L4s get targeted often. That risk won't increase with that proposal because high-sec has a lot of solo players and the ships are fitted for PvE.
Implied risk, if you like to think it's risky that's up to you but in most cases the risk is next to nothing. Some might let you take the stuff, others might blow up the stuff but the risk to you is minimal in general. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4288
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:36:00 -
[58] - Quote
Anslo wrote:If we get screwed, so do you goon stooge.
oh dear, faction mods might cost more than a pittance? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Xenuria
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
594
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:39:00 -
[59] - Quote
Lyskal Oskold wrote:Does make sense. I approve. AFKers bug me and make FW turn into a carebear fest...
Your avatar looks like a girl I used to know. Xenuria CSM 8 |

Richter Enderas
Kaesong Kosmonauts Test Alliance Please Ignore
166
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:43:00 -
[60] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Lyskal Oskold wrote:Does make sense. I approve. AFKers bug me and make FW turn into a carebear fest... Your avatar looks like a girl I used to know.
Tell us about the time you were kicked from TEST because you admitted to viewing child pornography. |
|

Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
398
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:54:00 -
[61] - Quote
Roime wrote:Destination SkillQueue wrote:I'd rather have bounties and LP. Having to loot every wreck for tags in order to make an income is boring as ****. Salvaging is about 400% more interesting than shooting rats. People in wormholes already loot & salvage everything, and never complain- because having your income in a tangible form, exposed to hostiles actually adds interesting gameplay.
If you think salvaging/looting is enjoyable then feel free to do so.
Do not try to force me to do it as well.
Thank you. You want fries with that? |

Bunnie Hop
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
347
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 14:54:00 -
[62] - Quote
Richter Enderas wrote:Xenuria wrote:Lyskal Oskold wrote:Does make sense. I approve. AFKers bug me and make FW turn into a carebear fest... Your avatar looks like a girl I used to know. Tell us about the time you were kicked from TEST because you admitted to viewing child pornography.
This kind of nonsense does not belong on the forums. |

Lady Ayeipsia
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
316
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:03:00 -
[63] - Quote
So explain how this would work in sov controlled nul sec? Would people running legitimate anoms and sites have to fly their tags to npc held space? Or would this be a new station service for tag collection? That would be a joy, having each alliance transfer sovs on their stations just to add new service mods.
Also, given that the best way to gain faction standings is with lvl 4 missions, anyone wanting to gain enough standings to anchor a pos would be forced to mission in low sec. Nice way to force people to play your way. And what of the epic arcs? Would you force them to be fully low sec oriented? (save for the sister's arc)
Seems to me that this is a poorly thought out idea that doesn't take into consideration all factors these changes would create. It's just a knee jerk reaction, good for starting discussions, but failing to actually take into account any true ramifications if the,proposal.
|

Hiyora Akachi
Bling Ring Tax Evaders
96
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:18:00 -
[64] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Another play it my way thread or nerf the hell out of Eve
Posting in a not so stealthy Play EvE my way thread.
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1040
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:22:00 -
[65] - Quote
Lady,
this is obviously a discussion-starter, not a complete suggestion essay which would belong to another section on the forum.
In my personal experience, looting and salvaging is not a terrible chore, neither is hauling the goods to stations to sell- this is what wormhole inhabitants do. Instead, it's an activity that promotes teamwork and sharing responsibilities in a corp. An op always has a dedicated salvager in a specialized ship.
And the important part is really teamwork. Trust in your fleet/corpmates, improving as an entity are the best parts of MMOs. So why not invite someone to loot and salvage with you? Fly with buddies to lowsec to run the L4s, someone keeping guard, while a small gang pops the rats, someone salvages afterwards? Even with current mechanics, co-operation like this makes PVE fun. Couple this with vastly improved rat AI, and we have something that would promote some nice brosefing in New Eden. Why not form a larger group, and assume control of a small pocket of lowsec? Keep the baddies out while you run the missions, and suddenly content has been created for not only you, but to the baddies as well.
As what comes to "destroying hisec" and "forcing people to play my way" BS, whatever changes made to hisec as an endless source of effort-free, anti-social income are good changes. We need to work towards solutions that encourage people to team up, and engage in all the fun that can be had outside the starter zone- to experience EVE at it's best. All these changes are meaningless as long as hisec offers a way to achieve the same, risk-free and bot-like.
And obviously converting bounties to loot would affect all areas outside wormholes.
Some are against, some for, but discussion is always good. Trolls need to step up their game, at least make an effort to be funny. Maybe something comes out of this, but now I'm opening a beer and have an EVE-free festival weekend. Open your minds and chill :) Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |
|

ISD TYPE40
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
98

|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:27:00 -
[66] - Quote
Thread cleaned of off topic troll posts and personal attacks, please stay on topic and post responsibly, thank you - ISD Type40. ISD Type40 Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:35:00 -
[67] - Quote
Roime wrote:And the important part is really teamwork. Trust in your fleet/corpmates, improving as an entity are the best parts of MMOs. So why not invite someone to loot and salvage with you? Fly with buddies to lowsec to run the L4s, someone keeping guard, while a small gang pops the rats, someone salvages afterwards? Even with current mechanics, co-operation like this makes PVE fun. Couple this with vastly improved rat AI, and we have something that would promote some nice brosefing in New Eden. Why not form a larger group, and assume control of a small pocket of lowsec? Keep the baddies out while you run the missions, and suddenly content has been created for not only you, but to the baddies as well.
Team work from NPC corps? You do realise that NPC corps are made up from all sorts of characters. We have alts from pirate corps for example, now how do you trust those? Or are you proposing to get rid of all NPC corps and force people into player corps?
Team work is limited in high-sec it's not like low-sec or 0.0 where most people are in player corps. Just because someone is in an NPC corp that does not make them anti-social by default. |

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries Alliance not Found
58
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:39:00 -
[68] - Quote
I quite like the first point.
Replacing bounties, LP and so forth with tags or tiers (a system which already exists and is open to player market involvement) does indeed seem reasonable at first glance.
There are questions as to how it would impact newer players, particularly if specialist equipment (salvagers) was required, how it might impact the secondary market (LP offers for tags for example) and so forth; not to mention that it discourages grouping up due to the increased difficulty of dividing the reward amongst the fleet.
And then the arguement collapsed under the old saw of "remove L4s from hisec".
(NB: The suggestion works best if L4s remain in hisec, consider for example how much you could make in Motsu just from tag theft, consider how many mission runners would have to evaluate the loss of their tags against the risk that the thief they shoot may return in a gank fit 'thron and blow them up... The economy is stimulated by the need to replace more ships, rather than stagnating due to a perception of paucity of money supply. |

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
438
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:41:00 -
[69] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote: High-sec ninja-looting is low risk because :carebears:. Would you agree that the proposed changes give more incentive to protect your loot and possibly work with a team for greater rewards?
You are wrong sir. High Sec Ninjas is low risk because:
1. Off-grid gang-boosters 2. Neutral remote repairs 3. Orca
Carebear or no carebear, if I ninja-loot you and you shoot my merlin, expect me back 30 seconds, flying ganka-hurricane, gang-boosted and perma-remote-repaired.
And please go ahead and shoot the repper, please please do... now repper comes in yet another ganka-hurricane. Or better yet, a falcon, for the lulz.... or neut-domi.
You have no way of winning unless you bring friends. There's no "greater rewards" when everybody stops mission running to come save your arse. It will turn high-sec into yet another blob fest where the ones with most friends win. Meaning, unless you are goon or test, you won't be able to mission run. Bad idea, bad bad bad.
"This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4290
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
Shameless Avenger wrote:Karl Hobb wrote: High-sec ninja-looting is low risk because :carebears:. Would you agree that the proposed changes give more incentive to protect your loot and possibly work with a team for greater rewards?
You are wrong sir. High Sec Ninjas is low risk because: 1. Off-grid gang-boosters 2. Neutral remote repairs 3. Orca
how many ninja looters actually do all of that? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
|

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
477
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:48:00 -
[71] - Quote
Andski wrote:Shameless Avenger wrote:You are wrong sir. High Sec Ninjas is low risk because:
1. Off-grid gang-boosters 2. Neutral remote repairs 3. Orca how many ninja looters actually do all of that? I know I don't. That's too much work for too little reward. That's, what, four accounts I'd need to be controlling for a pittance in loot? Might as well blitz L4s instead. Nothing Found |

Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
398
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:57:00 -
[72] - Quote
I am happy to play Eve solo with all the limitations my play-style imposes on me.
Sandbox. You want fries with that? |

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
439
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 17:35:00 -
[73] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Andski wrote:Shameless Avenger wrote:You are wrong sir. High Sec Ninjas is low risk because:
1. Off-grid gang-boosters 2. Neutral remote repairs 3. Orca how many ninja looters actually do all of that? I know I don't. That's too much work for too little reward. That's, what, four accounts I'd need to be controlling for a pittance in loot? Might as well blitz L4s instead.
@Andsky: No serious ninja-looting gang will ninja-loot without at least 2 of those 2. So I would say, ALL?
@Karl: Little reward? You think we go after the loot don't you? Nope, we go after *you* and your faction/officer fit.
I could provide killboard links to show you *exactly* how often this happens, how many people do it and how much ISK you get out of it. But I suggest you just browse C&P more often.
And before anybody mentions that blizting eliminates ninja-looting... lol, we ninja-loot the damsel... now what u gonna do? Come on bear.. shoot me, just once... please shoot... pleeeeeseeee 
"This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Demolishar
United Aggression
328
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:23:00 -
[74] - Quote
Urgg Boolean wrote:No. A better idea is to shift the in-game currency to Rings of Jordan
A nice reminder that no matter how bad CCP can be, it can still get worse  |

Jonah Gravenstein
724
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:32:00 -
[75] - Quote
Demolishar wrote:Urgg Boolean wrote:No. A better idea is to shift the in-game currency to Rings of Jordan
A nice reminder that no matter how bad CCP can be, it can still get worse 
It could be EA?
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
440
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:36:00 -
[76] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: It could be EA?
EA is great. In fact, I would love to fit a full rack of USAS 12's on my Talos. "This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Syler Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:43:00 -
[77] - Quote
Remove bounties all together and switch to a drop system of initially useless crap that can be converted into usable goods. Make people work for isk not kill rat x and get x amount, tags is a very limited scope. Also use a limited version of sleeper AI on ALL rats, to make pve not crap. Remove static missions and make them randomly generated, with more interaction and less focus on quantity of rats but quality. |

Patrakele
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
82
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:45:00 -
[78] - Quote
Also make the only place you can sell those in 0.0. Why? CAUSE FU THATS WHY |

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
440
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:47:00 -
[79] - Quote
Patrakele wrote:Also make the only place you can sell those in 0.0. Why? CAUSE FU THATS WHY
So, if you are not goon or test you can't use the market? LOL "This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
75
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:48:00 -
[80] - Quote
Change nothing, or we care bears will vote with our wallet and leave en masse. Enjoy your lack of revenue. |
|

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
440
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:49:00 -
[81] - Quote
This thread is just trolls... they can't be serious. "This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Chokichi Ozuwara
Royal One Piece Corporation Deadly Unknown
429
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:52:00 -
[82] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:I'd rather have bounties and LP. Having to loot every wreck for tags in order to make an income is boring as ****. Particularly since CCP has slowed down can opening, and done almost everything imaginable to make salvaging a miserable activity. Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |

Syler Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:53:00 -
[83] - Quote
Shameless Avenger wrote:This thread is just trolls... they can't be serious.
I wasn't. Eve's general PvE needs a change badly, not to mention the never ending battle of faucets vs. sinks and the downfall of the industrial professions.
|

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
441
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:57:00 -
[84] - Quote
Syler Puuntai wrote:Shameless Avenger wrote:This thread is just trolls... they can't be serious. I wasn't. Eve's general PvE needs a change badly, not to mention the never ending battle of faucets vs. sinks and the downfall of the industrial professions.
Troll... We have been having bounties for almost a decade. It's not broken.
"This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
441
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 19:59:00 -
[85] - Quote
You guys seem to forget the drone regions, back when there was no bounty. How well did that worked? "This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Radius Prime
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 20:00:00 -
[86] - Quote
BS
Lets nerf hi-sec blabla. One step closer to completely getting rid of it right? Let's flame some carebears while we are at it as well right? Who would you hunt when everyone is a pvp player. Most of you tough guy griefers don't even like a fight you can't easily win. You wont stop nagging till you can camp Trial account spawning stations and make sure you kill Eve. Coward shark warped as soon as he saw he lost.
Removing hi-sec is making null-sec hi-sec. You do get that there would be no more reason for travel anymore. Everybody will just stick to the small/large pocket of space controlled by their alliance. Solo and small gang pvp would effectively become rare to non-existant in favour of all out alliance lag wars where skill becomes meaningless.
Tired of these short-sighted people. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
75
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 20:00:00 -
[87] - Quote
Syler Puuntai wrote:Shameless Avenger wrote:This thread is just trolls... they can't be serious. I wasn't. Eve's general PvE needs a change badly, not to mention the never ending battle of faucets vs. sinks and the downfall of the industrial professions.
Who cares, I play this game for spaceships, not economic hardships from gouging greedy fucks. Things will stay as they are. Deal with it. |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
4
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 20:10:00 -
[88] - Quote
Quote:Replace all NPC bounties with lootable tags I say YES, more tags please. But not all NPC should have it, just more tags, less bounties.
Quote: Combine this with rat AI revamp
I say YES.
Quote: removal of L4s from hisec
I say NO. Also add random mission generator. Something like random dungeons in RPGs.
Quote:AFK ISK miners problem Make non respawning, scannable ALL anomalies and DED complexes. That will teach them. COSMOS missions also should be more like normal missions non respawnable (in sense of NPCs). |

Syler Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 20:40:00 -
[89] - Quote
Shameless Avenger wrote:Troll... We have been having bounties for almost a decade. It's not broken.
This just shows the lack of knowledge when it comes to economics. Eve tries to mimic a RL economy, however one major fault is that in Eve money isn't based on any set value nor is it in limited supply, it comes out of no where. So as time goes on and population grows, more and more money gets seeded into the market which can and will cause hyperinflation or in actuality devaluation of goods. While their are sinks in place to remove money from the game aswell as the destruction of goods which helps remove some, however even with that the faucets out weigh the sinks heavily.
In short the current system doesn't scale well with population.
Shameless Avenger wrote:You guys seem to forget the drone regions, back when there was no bounty. How well did that worked?
Drone regions where one of the wealthiest and productive groups when it comes to being self sustainable and production ability. The failure of drone regions was that the loot system didn't necessarily complement the industrial base as a whole, it actually destroyed one aspect of it. Not only that your talking about a single area that was a completely different concept then the rest of its peers. If the entirety of the bounty system was changed then it wouldn't be as much of a problem. Other then people complaining they have to loot stuff. If people can have a lazier way to do the same thing they will choose that, if you remove that people will adapt or quit, Eve isn't about making things easy, its more a darwinist mentality. Also to counter your argument, WHs use the same loot system and has done very well since its release.
Anslo wrote:Who cares, I play this game for spaceships, not economic hardships from gouging greedy ****s. Things will stay as they are. Deal with it.
Very narrow sighted if you can't see how the economics and all other aspects of Eve rely heavily on each other. Ignoring one aspect can greatly effect another. If you can't see why things need a change and why CCP has been slowly shifting towards this type of system anyways to reduce faucets, then you will be in for a real surprise. |

Renan Ruivo
Irmandade Vera Cruz Alliance
845
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 21:12:00 -
[90] - Quote
Yes to replacing bounties with tags. No to NPC tag buy orders No to removing LP payouts from FW.
This would actually help with the faction module/ship market. A lot. The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die. |
|

Syler Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 21:38:00 -
[91] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Yes to replacing bounties with tags. No to NPC tag buy orders No to removing LP payouts from FW.
This would actually help with the faction module/ship market. A lot.
it depends on what you mean by helping that market. If your talking about it from a buyers standpoint then yes. Since it will flood the market with tags making items cheaper. If your a seller then no, since it will reduce profit if you collect the tags yourself.
Adding NPC buy orders would be bad, at least from some of the original reasonings for this system. Since it still injects isk into the market out of thin air. It just creates a extra burden without actually solving the underlining problem.
|

Renan Ruivo
Irmandade Vera Cruz Alliance
845
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 23:17:00 -
[92] - Quote
Syler Puuntai wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Yes to replacing bounties with tags. No to NPC tag buy orders No to removing LP payouts from FW.
This would actually help with the faction module/ship market. A lot. it depends on what you mean by helping that market. If your talking about it from a buyers standpoint then yes. Since it will flood the market with tags making items cheaper. If your a seller then no, since it will reduce profit if you collect the tags yourself. Adding NPC buy orders would be bad, at least from some of the original reasonings for this system. Since it still injects isk into the market out of thin air. It just creates a extra burden without actually solving the underlining problem.
It depends. I'm a faction item seller, and acquiring the tags is a big part of the investment. LP is another part of that investment, and to get LP i need to kill rats. I also do the salvage, so if i got the tags from the rats that i had killed, it might lower the costs of buying the tags from the market.
So actually, i guess, i'd suggest replacing bounties with LP. Bounties generate ISK out of thin air, and LP generate itens that can be destroyed.
The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
275
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 23:42:00 -
[93] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Syler Puuntai wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Yes to replacing bounties with tags. No to NPC tag buy orders No to removing LP payouts from FW.
This would actually help with the faction module/ship market. A lot. it depends on what you mean by helping that market. If your talking about it from a buyers standpoint then yes. Since it will flood the market with tags making items cheaper. If your a seller then no, since it will reduce profit if you collect the tags yourself. Adding NPC buy orders would be bad, at least from some of the original reasonings for this system. Since it still injects isk into the market out of thin air. It just creates a extra burden without actually solving the underlining problem. It depends. I'm a faction item seller, and acquiring the tags is a big part of the investment. LP is another part of that investment, and to get LP i need to kill rats. I also do the salvage, so if i got the tags from the rats that i had killed, it might lower the costs of buying the tags from the market. So actually, i guess, i'd suggest replacing bounties with LP. Bounties generate ISK out of thin air, and LP generate itens that can be destroyed. That doesn't help the LP item market though as it makes LP accrue faster and thus devalues it. |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
137
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:18:00 -
[94] - Quote
Yeah looting, there's a stimulating game mechanic.  ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Syler Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:22:00 -
[95] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Yeah looting, there's a stimulating game mechanic. 
Its like christmas with every rat you kill. However the discussion of loot isn't about stimulating game play, its more about curbing the trillions of isk bounties inject into the economy.
|

Renan Ruivo
Irmandade Vera Cruz Alliance
845
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:22:00 -
[96] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Syler Puuntai wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Yes to replacing bounties with tags. No to NPC tag buy orders No to removing LP payouts from FW.
This would actually help with the faction module/ship market. A lot. it depends on what you mean by helping that market. If your talking about it from a buyers standpoint then yes. Since it will flood the market with tags making items cheaper. If your a seller then no, since it will reduce profit if you collect the tags yourself. Adding NPC buy orders would be bad, at least from some of the original reasonings for this system. Since it still injects isk into the market out of thin air. It just creates a extra burden without actually solving the underlining problem. It depends. I'm a faction item seller, and acquiring the tags is a big part of the investment. LP is another part of that investment, and to get LP i need to kill rats. I also do the salvage, so if i got the tags from the rats that i had killed, it might lower the costs of buying the tags from the market. So actually, i guess, i'd suggest replacing bounties with LP. Bounties generate ISK out of thin air, and LP generate itens that can be destroyed. That doesn't help the LP item market though as it makes LP accrue faster and thus devalues it.
Suggesting that they replace bounties with LP is a high-level suggestion. Of course that things like not ******* up the LP stores would have to be considered.
For instance, if now theres more LP being distributed, then make itens cost more LP. Its not an easy change, and sacrifices will have to be made. But i know that they are not affraid of upseting the status-quo. The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die. |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
137
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:27:00 -
[97] - Quote
Syler Puuntai wrote:Sentamon wrote:Yeah looting, there's a stimulating game mechanic.  Its like christmas with every rat you kill. However the discussion of loot isn't about stimulating game play, its more about curbing the trillions of isk bounties inject into the economy.
Boring people into quitting will defiantly do that. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Syler Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:30:00 -
[98] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Syler Puuntai wrote:Sentamon wrote:Yeah looting, there's a stimulating game mechanic.  Its like christmas with every rat you kill. However the discussion of loot isn't about stimulating game play, its more about curbing the trillions of isk bounties inject into the economy. Boring people into quitting will defiantly do that.
Thats pretty much what PvE already does, so I don't see the issue.
|

Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:32:00 -
[99] - Quote
Syler Puuntai wrote: Drone regions where one of the wealthiest and productive groups when it comes to being self sustainable and production ability.
AKA... it was carebear heaven. That's what we want? More null regions full of occators and manufacturing arrays? Where carriers are only deployed to bring BPOs from empire?
"This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |

Syler Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:36:00 -
[100] - Quote
Shameless Avenger wrote:Syler Puuntai wrote: Drone regions where one of the wealthiest and productive groups when it comes to being self sustainable and production ability.
AKA... it was carebear heaven. That's what we want? More null regions full of occators and manufacturing arrays? Where carriers are only deployed to bring BPOs from empire?
More bears=more targets.
|
|

Hiyora Akachi
Bling Ring Tax Evaders
97
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:42:00 -
[101] - Quote
Posting again in a blatant "Play EvE my way or leave" thread. |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
137
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:53:00 -
[102] - Quote
Guess who loves looting? yeah BOTS and bot writers.
How about just don't AFK for 24 hours straight and leave the casual players be. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Syler Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 00:55:00 -
[103] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Guess who loves looting? yeah BOTS and bot writers.
Now your just getting lazy. Did you even think that one through? |

Soundwave Plays Diablo
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
102
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 01:47:00 -
[104] - Quote
If AFK'ers bother you then you have no soul.
/therad |

Jonah Gravenstein
725
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 01:52:00 -
[105] - Quote
Soundwave Plays Diablo wrote:If AFK'ers bother you then you have no soul.
/therad
Do you wear the hood because you are in fact a ginger?
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Soundwave Plays Diablo
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
102
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 01:55:00 -
[106] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Soundwave Plays Diablo wrote:If AFK'ers bother you then you have no soul.
/therad Do you wear the hood because you are in fact a ginger? 
So no one will know that I am in fact Soundwave.
Who is a ginger.
So technically, yes. |

Jonah Gravenstein
725
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 01:58:00 -
[107] - Quote
Soundwave Plays Diablo wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Soundwave Plays Diablo wrote:If AFK'ers bother you then you have no soul.
/therad Do you wear the hood because you are in fact a ginger?  So no one will know that I am in fact Soundwave. Who is a ginger. So technically, yes.
lol well played sir, nice rebuttal
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Denidil
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
451
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 02:27:00 -
[108] - Quote
OP: Your post is bad, and you should feel bad. If you don't see a problem in 0.0 eroding into two big super-coalitions and a few hangers on in areas nobody cares about.. then you don't have brains. |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
636
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 03:14:00 -
[109] - Quote
Roime wrote:Yes,
Combine this with rat AI revamp and the removal of L4s from hisec, and EVE economy is back on track again.
no you are an idiot it has been said before, nerf missions LESS people will go to low or nullsec. get over yourself you are a moron.
|

Flamewave
Crimson Moon Society
24
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 05:12:00 -
[110] - Quote
Step in the right direction, however one flaw:
Roime wrote:Replace all NPC bounties with lootable tags, that can be sold to NPC buy orders. NPC buy orders are an isk faucet and therefore this won't dent inflation. If, instead of tags, the rats dropped items useful to other players, no isk would enter the system and mission runners might actually stop being worthless for once. Though the only issue with this is any item(s) the rats were to drop in place of tags would drive down the market value of whatever it is they would now drop (as was the case of the drone regions) unless they were to drop something entirely new, in which case whole new chunks of game design would need to be implemented to make the items have value to other players.
Reverse engineering faction modules maybe? Who knows, the options are plentiful.  Some things ISK can't buy. For everything else, there's Jita.
YouTube |
|

Lady Aja
61
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 05:25:00 -
[111] - Quote
Shameless Avenger wrote:gobbybobby wrote:Shameless Avenger wrote:No why not? Explain? You want to replace all bounties with NPC tags that need to be looted. Do you have any idea how long it takes to loot a field on a slow battleship? With one wreck 90km away, flying at 25O, that's 6 minutes just to fly to ONE wreck. And you want to keep people from going AFK?
that's such a load of bullshit.
noctis.. where is my ability to link a sig properly CCP you munters!! |

Goremageddon Box
Guerrilla Flotilla
467
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 05:36:00 -
[112] - Quote
Lady Aja wrote:Shameless Avenger wrote:gobbybobby wrote:Shameless Avenger wrote:No why not? Explain? You want to replace all bounties with NPC tags that need to be looted. Do you have any idea how long it takes to loot a field on a slow battleship? With one wreck 90km away, flying at 25O, that's 6 minutes just to fly to ONE wreck. And you want to keep people from going AFK? that's such a load of bullshit. noctis.. No. Cant spell noctis without no. |

marVLs
31
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 05:49:00 -
[113] - Quote
Let's see... |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |