Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux War.Pigs.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 01:32:00 -
[301]
Originally by: Omara Otawan
Originally by: Liang Nuren
T1 cruisers are utterly obsoleted by BCs, and that's a fact.
Thats a myth, besides t1 cruisers arent the only cruiser hulls in the game.
It's hardly a myth. A T1 cruiser has no place and people are often encouraged to skip them entirely in favor of battlecruisers - especially given that battlecruisers aren't really any more skill intensive and deliver much, much better performance. As for T2 cruisers - the only ones with any kind of role remaining are the ones that aren't brawling. The brawling T2 cruisers get known by such affectionate terms as "Diemost".
Quote:
I'll take a well-rounded HAC / recon gang over BC junk any day for roaming, shockingly for the the same reason I'd take a BC gang over a BS gang for roaming.
Ah yes, by "well-rounded" you mean "Cynabals", "Curses", "Rooks", and "Scimitars". Fantastic - who needs Battleships when you have such amazing ships to fall back on.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter - Blog got deleted when Evepress died - |
DHB WildCat
BURN EDEN
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 01:34:00 -
[302]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
Originally by: DHB WildCat
You are correct I did bash FW and always will. If you so choose to think FW is better than 0.0 so be it. However please do not make it personal, at no time did I ever bring you or your corp / alliance into it. I only ask the same respect and curteousy. I have enough people that smack me and my corp without reading the post as it is.
HEY BRO FW SUCKS LOL
(time passes)
WHY YOU GOT TO MAKE IT PERSONAL BRO THAT AIN'T COOL
(time passes)
I MEAN YEAH I'M BETTER THAN YOU BUT THAT'S NOT ELITISM
(time passes)
AGAIN WITH THE PERSONAL ATTACKS THIS IS LAME I DIDN'T SAY NUTHIN
Separately, if someone insults your corp, it is not a "personal" attack unless your entire corp consists of you. Which is more botting than I think even UDIE does, frankly.
All right you piece of **** if you want to make this personal lets do this. Anywhere any time you bring a battleship and ill 1 vs 1 you in a cruiser... I am certain I will own you. You obviously play FW which makes you a noob, and I am so much better than you (sarcasm). There now I just insulted you. Now you have a reason to whine like a little girl. I will meet you anywhere in empire and drop a can for you.
Okay now that I have come to your level of childishness, I cant wait to prove my point to you singlehandedly by owning your ass with a cruiser!
Game on!
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 01:47:00 -
[303]
Edited by: Omara Otawan on 15/12/2010 01:48:50
Originally by: Liang Nuren
It's hardly a myth. A T1 cruiser has no place and people are often encouraged to skip them entirely in favor of battlecruisers
By fools. T1 cruisers can play the same game as t2 cruisers can, just without the nice secondary abiltities of recons.
Originally by: Liang Nuren The brawling T2 cruisers get known by such affectionate terms as "Diemost".
It might be a surprise, but the deimos doesnt necessarily have to be a brawler these days. Agreed, its kinda unpopular though as the general forum opinion is its terrible.
Quote:
Ah yes, by "well-rounded" you mean "Cynabals", "Curses", "Rooks", and "Scimitars". Fantastic - who needs Battleships when you have such amazing ships to fall back on.
You forgot to include Cerberus, Zealot, Vagabond, Ishtar, Gila, Huginn, Lachesis, heck too many to list them all. Logistics arent even mandatory with proper tactics, but certainly a huge asset.
Now this is obviously a totally different playstyle than you'll have with battleship fleets, so what the hell has the battleship to do with it anyway?
|
Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 01:51:00 -
[304]
You still don't know what "personal" means, for the record.
It's tempting. I don't think I'll be able to play eve for the next few days (I am sure you find this concept unimaginable) but yeah, I'll eve mail you for the legendary fight of the century, whereby when you lose you say "WELL I WUZ IN A CRUISER" and probably something about "noobs."
When you say "cruiser" what are you talking about exactly? t3? hac? Because I really can't afford a t3 (enter botting joke here), and I don't fly a vaga, so that's a bit weak.
|
William Cooly
Sol Enterprises
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 01:51:00 -
[305]
Originally by: DHB WildCat
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
Originally by: DHB WildCat
You are correct I did bash FW and always will. If you so choose to think FW is better than 0.0 so be it. However please do not make it personal, at no time did I ever bring you or your corp / alliance into it. I only ask the same respect and curteousy. I have enough people that smack me and my corp without reading the post as it is.
HEY BRO FW SUCKS LOL
(time passes)
WHY YOU GOT TO MAKE IT PERSONAL BRO THAT AIN'T COOL
(time passes)
I MEAN YEAH I'M BETTER THAN YOU BUT THAT'S NOT ELITISM
(time passes)
AGAIN WITH THE PERSONAL ATTACKS THIS IS LAME I DIDN'T SAY NUTHIN
Separately, if someone insults your corp, it is not a "personal" attack unless your entire corp consists of you. Which is more botting than I think even UDIE does, frankly.
All right you piece of **** if you want to make this personal lets do this. Anywhere any time you bring a battleship and ill 1 vs 1 you in a cruiser... I am certain I will own you. You obviously play FW which makes you a noob, and I am so much better than you (sarcasm). There now I just insulted you. Now you have a reason to whine like a little girl. I will meet you anywhere in empire and drop a can for you.
Okay now that I have come to your level of childishness, I cant wait to prove my point to you singlehandedly by owning your ass with a cruiser!
Game on!
AH TAKE BOTH YOUZ NUBS ON IN MAH RIFTAHHHHHHH!!! -
I troll stupid people. |
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux War.Pigs.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 01:52:00 -
[306]
Originally by: Omara Otawan By fools. T1 cruisers can play the same game as t2 cruisers can, just without the nice secondary abiltities of recons.
So your entire argument boils down to the blackbird. Really?
Quote: It might be a surprise, but the deimos doesnt necessarily have to be a brawler these days. Agreed, its kinda unpopular though as the general forum opinion is its terrible.
That's more than just forum opinion.
Quote: You forgot to include Cerberus, Vagabond, Ishtar, Gila, Huginn, Lachesis, heck too many to list them all. Logistics arent even mandatory with proper tactics, but certainly a huge asset.
Ok, so now you're just trolling.
Quote: Now this is obviously a totally different playstyle than you'll have with battleship fleets, so what the hell has the battleship to do with it anyway?
Perhaps its a play style which obsoletes battleships in small gang combat? Maybe the thing that the whole thread is about. Just saying.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter - Blog got deleted when Evepress died - |
The Djego
Minmatar Hellequin Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 01:59:00 -
[307]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney When you say "cruiser" what are you talking about exactly? t3? hac? Because I really can't afford a t3 (enter botting joke here), and I don't fly a vaga, so that's a bit weak.
Mate, you need to bring the BS, not the cruiser. ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:00:00 -
[308]
Originally by: Liang Nuren
So your entire argument boils down to the blackbird. Really?
I wasnt even thinking about the blackbird tbh.
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Quote: You forgot to include Cerberus, Vagabond, Ishtar, Gila, Huginn, Lachesis, heck too many to list them all. Logistics arent even mandatory with proper tactics, but certainly a huge asset.
Ok, so now you're just trolling.
Frankly, I get the impression you are the one trolling here. If you honestly cant see how the Cerberus fits in with 56+km webs and points...
|
Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:00:00 -
[309]
Edited by: Emperor Cheney on 15/12/2010 02:00:59
Originally by: The Djego
Originally by: Emperor Cheney When you say "cruiser" what are you talking about exactly? t3? hac? Because I really can't afford a t3 (enter botting joke here), and I don't fly a vaga, so that's a bit weak.
Mate, you need to bring the BS, not the cruiser.
Oh I know, I'm just seeing a whole lot of ways for optimal skeeziness on his end here. There are obviously a whole lot of cruiser hulls that can beat 99% of bs's in a staged one on one, unless fitted in some crazy fashion. Some random BS against any and all cruiser hulls where he obviously has pretty much unlimited ISK and SP is giving him all the advantages.
|
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux War.Pigs.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:04:00 -
[310]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney There are obviously a whole lot of cruiser hulls that can beat 99% of bs's
El Oh El -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter - Blog got deleted when Evepress died - |
|
The Djego
Minmatar Hellequin Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:05:00 -
[311]
Edited by: The Djego on 15/12/2010 02:05:50
Originally by: Emperor Cheney Edited by: Emperor Cheney on 15/12/2010 02:00:59
Originally by: The Djego
Originally by: Emperor Cheney When you say "cruiser" what are you talking about exactly? t3? hac? Because I really can't afford a t3 (enter botting joke here), and I don't fly a vaga, so that's a bit weak.
Mate, you need to bring the BS, not the cruiser.
Oh I know, I'm just seeing a whole lot of ways for optimal skeeziness on his end here. There are obviously a whole lot of cruiser hulls that can beat 99% of bs's in a staged one on one, unless fitted in some crazy fashion. Some random BS against any and all cruiser hulls where he obviously has pretty much unlimited ISK and SP is giving him all the advantages.
Mate use full honor, like any skilled BS pilot does and bring your preferred cookie cuter BS to pawn this little cruiser. You can check the KBs of real low Sec dwellers what they use and what satisfies all her "I pawned this cruiser with my BS!" needs.
---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|
Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:06:00 -
[312]
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Originally by: Emperor Cheney There are obviously a whole lot of cruiser hulls that can beat 99% of bs's
El Oh El
. . .in a staged one on one. Way to selectively quote there.
|
Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:10:00 -
[313]
Originally by: The Djego
Mate use full honor, like any skilled BS pilot does and bring your preferred cookie cuter BS to pawn this little cruiser. You can check the KBs of real low Sec dwellers what they use and what satisfies all her "I pawned this cruiser with my BS!" needs.
honor!
A fast kiting ship pretty obviously has the edge in a one on one against pretty much any bs.
What are you even arguing here?
Is the idea that somewhere I said battleships are best for everything everywhere always? Because that's almost the opposite of what I said anywhere here. A one on one is an extremely staged circumstance in which fringe fittings thrive. I've said numerous times, here, that battleships shouldn't be deployed solo. I'm not knocking it at all, but after a whole thread talking about nullsec and lowsec fights, to suddenly make blind 1 v 1 the ultimate measure of a ship is, well, kind of silly.
|
TheZealot O0O0O
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:11:00 -
[314]
Edited by: TheZealot O0O0O on 15/12/2010 02:11:20 No.
|
Infinity Ziona
Minmatar Cloakers
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:13:00 -
[315]
Originally by: Hiroshima Jita
Originally by: Ephemeron
Battleship is the easiest sub-cap ship to tackle. It is easiest to catch and hold for the blob to come by and pound it to death. It is easiest to probe down. It is most susceptible to bomber strikes It is most vulnerable sub-cap to capitol attacks - particularly fighters and bombers It is easiest target to hit - both due to lack of speed and large sig radius - you can always deal your full damage to a battleship
Why does battleship have to be such an easy punching bag?
Because having a large sig radius and being slow is what defines a battleship compared to something smaller.
And you can never create a ship that will defeat blobs. If you make a solopwnmobile people will fly fleets of the things.
On the buffing battleship fleets, I think you could do wonders by making it harder to bomb battleship fleets. Bombs are kind of like reverse pre-nerf doomsdays. BC, Cruisers are fine with getting bombed, battleships take the worst beating.
Ships are not defined by their weaknesses. Battleships were defined by being the hardest hitting, longest lasting ships. They were given the penalties you mention to balance out their capabilities.
They no longer have the benefits that justify the penalties. Thanks to sig radius and speed negating damage they have fallen behind and cannot compete effectively.
They were never supposed to be purely fleet ships, they were intended also, and did extremely well, in small gangs and even solo.
Successive nerfs to aspects of the game and the addition of other ship classes have unintentionally outdated them.
They need increased build cost, increased dps and increased tank to balance them again. --------------------------------------------- Hate Bots / RMT? Do something worthwhile and good for EvE and cause tears and anguish for others, while doing absolutely nothing yourself! Join up. |
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux War.Pigs.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:13:00 -
[316]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney . . .in a staged one on one. Way to selectively quote there.
No, it perfectly illustrated exactly what the problem is with battleships. Battleships are "stupendous" and "mighty" and "contemptuous of all the small things" - and yet the small things are so incredibly powerful versus a battleship. The line of thinking that battleships shouldn't be able to affect small things needs reversed as well - small things shouldn't be able to affect battleships.
Unless we just throw that line of thinking out altogether.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter - Blog got deleted when Evepress died - |
Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:17:00 -
[317]
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Originally by: Emperor Cheney . . .in a staged one on one. Way to selectively quote there.
No, it perfectly illustrated exactly what the problem is with battleships. Battleships are "stupendous" and "mighty" and "contemptuous of all the small things" - and yet the small things are so incredibly powerful versus a battleship. The line of thinking that battleships shouldn't be able to affect small things needs reversed as well - small things shouldn't be able to affect battleships.
Unless we just throw that line of thinking out altogether.
-Liang
If battleships could do all that, why would anyone fly anything smaller for dps? You're basically arguing for even less ship diversity.
|
The Djego
Minmatar Hellequin Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:17:00 -
[318]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
Originally by: The Djego
Mate use full honor, like any skilled BS pilot does and bring your preferred cookie cuter BS to pawn this little cruiser. You can check the KBs of real low Sec dwellers what they use and what satisfies all her "I pawned this cruiser with my BS!" needs.
honor!
A fast kiting ship pretty obviously has the edge in a one on one against pretty much any bs.
You really fly a blaster BS? If so, I'm speechless. This is hilarious behind believe.
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
Is the idea that somewhere I said battleships are best for everything everywhere always? Because that's almost the opposite of what I said anywhere here. A one on one is an extremely staged circumstance in which fringe fittings thrive. I've said numerous times, here, that battleships shouldn't be deployed solo. I'm not knocking it at all, but after a whole thread talking about nullsec and lowsec fights, to suddenly make blind 1 v 1 the ultimate measure of a ship is, well, kind of silly.
Take it from someone that still flies BS solo, you fail. ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|
Helicity Boson
Amarr The Python Cartel. The Jerk Cartel
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:17:00 -
[319]
Edited by: Helicity Boson on 15/12/2010 02:25:38 Compared to BCs battleships just lack the ability to mount escape in the current age of FW/titanbridge blob-warfare EVE.
While it seems attractive to take a BS along for the extra oomph once you have a target tackled with smaller vessels, the reality is that a battlecruiser is just... better in almost all cases. And not just in price/value ratio.
I'd add to that for pirates nowadays, I'd say skipping T1 cruisers entirely and focusing on BC/HAC/Recon is pretty much the standard.
A T1 cruiser is a deathtrap for criminals in lowsec. slow enough to get caught, not tough enough to handle gateguns, vulnerable to tech 2 frigates. A BC is better in almost all situations. AFs are still mostly useless, inties got replaced by dramiels, and all of them are incapable of fighting on gates/stations.
BSs just get WTFjumpbridged by bored nullsec corps within hours.
Basically we get to fly 3 ship classes, or have to bend over backwards to make others work.
pretty crooked imho.
|
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux War.Pigs.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:18:00 -
[320]
Edited by: Liang Nuren on 15/12/2010 02:20:04
Originally by: Emperor Cheney to suddenly make blind 1 v 1 the ultimate measure of a ship is, well, kind of silly.
No, it really isn't - especially when the entire discussion revolves around small gang uses of battleships. Furthermore, when solo PVP'ing, that is the ideal situation you hope to encounter. And, that situation happens more often than you'd think.
Not that I expect you to know that.
Originally by: Emperor Cheney If battleships could do all that, why would anyone fly anything smaller for dps? You're basically arguing for even less ship diversity.
Who said I think it should do all of that? I'm just saying that the traditional argument of battleships being utterly ineffective against smaller ships is total bull**** as long as smaller ships are 100% effective against battleships.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter - Blog got deleted when Evepress died - |
|
Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:24:00 -
[321]
Originally by: The Djego
You really fly a blaster BS? If so, I'm speechless. This is hilarious behind believe.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7521306 ?
But I'm not sure what this has to do with anything. I don't even know what "behind believe" means. I wasn't talking about a blaster BS necessarily, because tracking exists - I don't even know what you're talking about at all.
Topics I was talking about
1) Battleships and their role in lowsec and nullsec
2) HONOURE DULES OF HONOUR
|
Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:29:00 -
[322]
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Originally by: Emperor Cheney to suddenly make blind 1 v 1 the ultimate measure of a ship is, well, kind of silly.
No, it really isn't - especially when the entire discussion revolves around small gang uses of battleships.
I'm completely turned around here. After me saying BS's shouldn't have a role in small gang stuff without scouts, now you're saying me not wanting to do a blind 1 v 1 against a (certainly) faster and more expensive ship in a 1 v 1 undercuts my point? No, it doesn't. I'm being perfectly consistent in not liking the things in small gang/solo work. Pretty sure a 1 v 1 also counts as small gang/solo.
Anyway, I feel this discussion and my place in it is getting really weighed down on "he posted/she posted" which doesn't advance anything, and I'm posting way too much in this thread without anything being advanced.
(makes "call me" motion to DBH Wildcat re: what we talking)
|
Anubis Xian
Reavers
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:34:00 -
[323]
I want to know who decided BSes shouldn't be mobile ships. One could surmise that since BSes are not capital ships in this silly game, that they should be just as viable a mobile platform as any other subcapital. Normalize max velocity for all ships. Change MWDs to being burst warp mods (say 50 km per pulse) allowing for closing and opening the gap.
Clearly the main problem is the idea that a BS is somehow supposed to be a mini dread, which was never the case... in fact the Dread was supposed to be the capital evolution of the BS. I guess it worked out that way ultimately though, both are useless in general pvp outside of specific applications.
Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
|
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux War.Pigs.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:34:00 -
[324]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney I'm completely turned around here.
Well that's been obvious for a few pages now.
Quote: After me saying BS's shouldn't have a role in small gang stuff without scouts
Scouts are nearing meaningless in the age of titan bridges and supercap hotdrops.
Quote: now you're saying me not wanting to do a blind 1 v 1 against a (certainly) faster and more expensive ship in a 1 v 1 undercuts my point? No, it doesn't. I'm being perfectly consistent in not liking the things in small gang/solo work.
You're being perfectly consistent in telling us that battleships simply don't and shouldn't have have a use unless you field a SUPER MEGA EPIC UBER BLOB of them. Where you're generally going to be better off in a BC anyway.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter - Blog got deleted when Evepress died - |
Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:35:00 -
[325]
Edited by: Emperor Cheney on 15/12/2010 02:36:05
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Scouts are nearing meaningless in the age of titan bridges and supercap hotdrops.
Your "small gangs" get hot dropped by supercaps often? Wow. That's pretty amazing.
|
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux War.Pigs.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:37:00 -
[326]
Edited by: Liang Nuren on 15/12/2010 02:38:28
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Scouts are nearing meaningless in the age of titan bridges and supercap hotdrops.
Your small gangs get hot dropped by supercaps often? Wow.
"Drake warping to the gate" "XXX, jump through and make sure he doesn't reapproach. YYY, ZZZ help me push him through. Nobody else engage" < Cyno up >
-Liang
Ed: Not sure what's so amazing about it, considering there's supercaps all over the FW regions. I think ~20 supercarriers is the biggest concentration that's hot dropped our gangs in low sec. I think we had 5 people there at the time. Titan bridging is honestly more common. -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter - Blog got deleted when Evepress died - |
The Djego
Minmatar Hellequin Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:39:00 -
[327]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
Originally by: The Djego
You really fly a blaster BS? If so, I'm speechless. This is hilarious behind believe.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7521306 ?
There is sometimes a moment in your live you want to believe it is still there(this might involve huge amounts of emoventism, balls and alcohol but yeah this is what blaster pvp was all about anyway). It also might have included a Web that didn't manage to hold the target in place and more than one neut on the gedon.
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
But I'm not sure what this has to do with anything. I don't even know what "behind believe" means. I wasn't talking about a blaster BS necessarily, because tracking exists - I don't even know what you're talking about at all. Topics I was talking about
1) Battleships and their role in lowsec and nullsec
2) HONOURE DULES OF HONOUR
What is funny since you started to smack about CAOD ****, that doesn't belong in a thread outside of CAOD and honestly not even in a thread in CAOD. ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|
Anubis Xian
Reavers
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:41:00 -
[328]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney Edited by: Emperor Cheney on 15/12/2010 02:36:05
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Scouts are nearing meaningless in the age of titan bridges and supercap hotdrops.
Your "small gangs" get hot dropped by supercaps often? Wow. That's pretty amazing.
Basic rule of thumb... if the fleet you are fighting has a cyno fitted, you will be hotdropped. The problem is you never know if it is going to happen or not and the only way to find out is to wait and see. It might be cool the first time, but the second time it is just annoying and takes the point of pvping and shoves it with a plunger in a dark direction.
Hotdropping is the most carebear form of pvp ever invented in this game.
Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
|
DHB WildCat
BURN EDEN
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:52:00 -
[329]
Edited by: DHB WildCat on 15/12/2010 02:53:14
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Originally by: Emperor Cheney to suddenly make blind 1 v 1 the ultimate measure of a ship is, well, kind of silly.
No, it really isn't - especially when the entire discussion revolves around small gang uses of battleships.
I'm completely turned around here. After me saying BS's shouldn't have a role in small gang stuff without scouts, now you're saying me not wanting to do a blind 1 v 1 against a (certainly) faster and more expensive ship in a 1 v 1 undercuts my point? No, it doesn't. I'm being perfectly consistent in not liking the things in small gang/solo work. Pretty sure a 1 v 1 also counts as small gang/solo.
Anyway, I feel this discussion and my place in it is getting really weighed down on "he posted/she posted" which doesn't advance anything, and I'm posting way too much in this thread without anything being advanced.
(makes "call me" motion to DBH Wildcat re: what we talking)
I am talking about your Battleship vs me in a cruiser such as a caracal, stabber, thorax, arbitrator... just to name one from each race.
Also you are correct. I will beat you because I'll outrun you, out ew you, tank your dps do to tracking issues and sig radius, then kill you because the set-up ill use does 700 dps with drones and primary weapons.
The entire point is to prove that a 10 mil cruiser after rigs and fitting will absolutely pwn you in a 200 mil Battleship after rigs and fittings and do so, so completely that it will leave you embarrassed and humiliated!
|
Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 02:54:00 -
[330]
Edited by: Emperor Cheney on 15/12/2010 02:55:48
Originally by: The Djego
What is funny since you started to smack about CAOD ****, that doesn't belong in a thread outside of CAOD and honestly not even in a thread in CAOD.
DBH dogged on me pretty much out of nowhere, so I dogged on him back. Then he melted down completely. I mean come on, that's at least kind of entertaining.
edit to add:
Originally by: DHB WildCat
The entire point is to prove that a 10 mil cruiser after rigs and fitting will absolutely pwn you in a 200 mil Battleship after rigs and fittings and do so, so completely that it will leave you embarrassed and humiliated!
I don't really know what this "point" has to do with anything, but okay, I will agree to fight your t1 cruiser. I'll send an evemail next time I'm online, see if our schedules work out.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |