| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
MrCaptAwsm
Caldari
Autistic Sharks
Test Alliance Please Ignore
   |
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:01:00 -
[241]
SBU's anchored before extended downtime twice in a row, and no consequences for IT, despite it being announced as an exploit.
And now, mysteriously bubbles going offline and supercaps getting out?
Yeah.
|
cpt Mike
Amarr
Metanoia.
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:05:00 -
[242]
Edited by: cpt Mike on 28/01/2011 19:05:27
I don't know about you all... but I am even more eager to fight now, knowing we fight against IT + CCP.
|
Viribus
Gallente
Autistic Sharks
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:07:00 -
[243]
This thread is just stuffed in every hole with bad posting, it's like someone just dumped a busload of Steam forum posters at an internet cafe and told them all to go to CAOD
|
Ken Cook
Caldari
Cobalt Dragon Exploration Company
Gentlemen's Agreement
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:08:00 -
[244]
 Originally by: Viribus
This thread is just stuffed in every hole with bad posting, it's like someone just dumped a busload of Steam forum posters at an internet cafe and told them all to go to CAOD
Steam is quality posts.
|
Farmstink
Caldari
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:12:00 -
[245]
Are we still at war with CCP? I forgot.
|
DantesInfernoRedux
Amarr
ANZAC ALLIANCE
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:16:00 -
[246]
Question is, how many bubbles were anchored on said pos? Excessive bubbling is an exploit in itself.
Love goon tears though. Never gets old.
|
Orkasm
Minmatar
Navy of Xoc
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:18:00 -
[247]
Edited by: Orkasm on 28/01/2011 19:18:51
Originally by: DantesInfernoRedux
Question is, how many bubbles were anchored on said pos? Excessive bubbling is an exploit in itself.
Love goon tears though. Never gets old.
Enough to cover the required area and no more, hardly 'Too Many Bubbles' when any less would not have been effective
So that excuse aint gonna fly
|
Karadion
Caldari
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:20:00 -
[248]
Originally by: DantesInfernoRedux
Question is, how many bubbles were anchored on said pos? Excessive bubbling is an exploit in itself.
Love goon tears though. Never gets old.
Too bad that's not true. You literally have to put so many bubbles in to strain the server (keyword being server here). Just because your crappy UI/video card can't handle it doesn't mean it's an exploit.
|
Iratus Aragrev
Minmatar
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:20:00 -
[249]
Edited by: Iratus Aragrev on 28/01/2011 19:20:26
Funny part is: not even the batphone will save fountain.
|
Viribus
Gallente
Autistic Sharks
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:21:00 -
[250]
Coming tomorrow, incursions in every constellation in fountain
|
DantesInfernoRedux
Amarr
ANZAC ALLIANCE
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:23:00 -
[251]
Edited by: DantesInfernoRedux on 28/01/2011 19:22:54
Originally by: Orkasm
Enough to cover the required area and no more, hardly 'Too Many Bubbles' when any less would not have been effective
So that excuse aint gonna fly
CCP doesn't go by goon standards of what is 'enough' sadly.
And to the muppet below, has nothing to do with videos settings. If its too many bubbles on a pos or gate, its an exploit.
Commence with the whinging.
|
Karadion
Caldari
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:27:00 -
[252]
Originally by: DantesInfernoRedux
Edited by: DantesInfernoRedux on 28/01/2011 19:22:54
Originally by: Orkasm
Enough to cover the required area and no more, hardly 'Too Many Bubbles' when any less would not have been effective
So that excuse aint gonna fly
CCP doesn't go by goon standards of what is 'enough' sadly.
And to the muppet below, has nothing to do with videos settings. If its too many bubbles on a pos or gate, its an exploit.
Commence with the whinging.
Prove it.
http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1446795#8 which I believe 20-40 bubbles were deployed per POS including the ones that everyone is concerned about so your standard is that as long it's owned by Test/GOONS, it's an exploit.
|
51layer
Amarr
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:27:00 -
[253]
It was not too many, it was just enough to be effective. Just shut your mouth trying to justify your cheating, you're just mad you lost a region to a bunch of noobs in rifters, how embarassing.
|
Tavi Jasoon
Gallente
Merch Industrial
Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:27:00 -
[254]
Originally by: Zagdul
Hi
I'm the person that anchored just about every T2 bubble.
How may I help?
I just wanted to say, that one bubble 50km off the POS was pretty pr0. C/D that you flipped the on switches for these? |
DantesInfernoRedux
Amarr
ANZAC ALLIANCE
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:30:00 -
[255]
Edited by: DantesInfernoRedux on 28/01/2011 19:32:33
Edited by: DantesInfernoRedux on 28/01/2011 19:32:10
Originally by: Karadion
Prove it.
http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1446795#8 which I believe 20-40 bubbles were deployed per POS including the ones that everyone is concerned about so your standard is that as long it's owned by Test/GOONS, it's an exploit.
I've stated my inquiry in a question format. I haven't made a decision on whether this was the case here. You, and the rest of the goon muppets, are definitively stating it wasn't the case.
And kudos for linking a thread stating nothing about the '20-40 bubbles' bit as anything beyond heresay. Try again?
|
Farham
Gallente
The Fimbriani
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:34:00 -
[256]
Some talented Goonie like person who is gifted in Photoshop/imaging needs to make a protest poster involving a clown stealing a monkey with a single gloved child molester in hot pursuit.
Not hacking it in 0.0 since 2006
Farham is my name, and fail quoting is my game. |
BAR0NESS
Amarr
Therapy.
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:34:00 -
[257]
Official Explanation
|
DantesInfernoRedux
Amarr
ANZAC ALLIANCE
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:34:00 -
[258]
Edited by: DantesInfernoRedux on 28/01/2011 19:34:51
Originally by: 51layer
It was not too many, it was just enough to be effective. Just shut your mouth trying to justify your cheating, you're just mad you lost a region to a bunch of noobs in rifters, how embarassing.
More goon emo. Now I'm cheating.
Still no definitive proof that the bubbling of said pos was not an exploit and ccp has justification at removing them.
And yeah, more of the end of days scenario based on potentially losing one system.
Shakin in me boots. 
|
Karadion
Caldari
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:35:00 -
[259]
Originally by: DantesInfernoRedux
Edited by: DantesInfernoRedux on 28/01/2011 19:31:54
Edited by: DantesInfernoRedux on 28/01/2011 19:30:48
Originally by: Karadion
Prove it.
http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1446795#8 which I believe 20-40 bubbles were deployed per POS including the ones that everyone is concerned about so your standard is that as long it's owned by Test/GOONS, it's an exploit.
I've stated my inquiry in a question format. I haven't made a decision on whether this was the case here. You, and the rest of the goon muppets, are definitively stating it wasn't the case.
And kudos for linking a thread stating nothing about the '20-40 bubbles' bit as beyond beyond heresay. Try again?
How is it hearsay when I linked to the exact comment who (confirmed or not) had petitioned CCP on excessive bubbles? Do you need a new dictionary? There are even free sites online that can help you clear up the definition of what hearsay is. I did answer your question though. There were 20-40 bubbles per tower / station which is more than enough but way less than what is considered to be an exploit by CCP because it is supposed to be a strain on the server, not on your GeForce2 MX 200 that you got and still haven't replaced.
Yes I'm a stupid goonie! I don't know what I'm talking about.
|
Genorator
Gallente
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:35:00 -
[260]
Originally by: DantesInfernoRedux
http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1446795#8 which I believe 20-40 bubbles were deployed per POS including the ones that everyone is concerned about so your standard is that as long it's owned by Test/GOONS, it's an exploit.
I've stated my inquiry in a question format. I haven't made a decision on whether this was the case here. You, and the rest of the goon muppets, are definitively stating it wasn't the case.
And kudos for linking a thread stating nothing about the '20-40 bubbles' bit as anything beyond heresay. Try again?
I'm very confused here. Did you send in the right forms to IT leadership to be allowed to post on COAD weeks ago and just have permission for multiple posts saved up, or have they cut back the bureaucracy and given you permission to post openly for a 2 hour period, though I'm certain every post you make will go under a judicial review.
Your CEOs micromanage your FCs, no wonder you haven't won a single engagement in over 3 months.
|
Garreth Vlox
Minmatar
Hysterically Unforgiving
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:37:00 -
[261]
bumping this so that all the new customers that look at this before getting into the game realize that CCP will let any allinace die, unless its run by molle in which case its ok to magically offline bubbles, and dont forget, the logs show nothing. i wonder how long i'd keep my job if i gave that line to my boss?...
|
Ken Cook
Caldari
Cobalt Dragon Exploration Company
Gentlemen's Agreement
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:38:00 -
[262]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GOqM18Bhhg
|
Kpowers
Gallente
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:42:00 -
[263]
Lulz Dante is mad IT is failcascading, and losing every fight to rifter noobs. The amount of bubbles on the POSs were JUST enough to be effective for their intended purpose. Say what you want, the only tears are clown tears, we aren't the ones with super capitals stuck in a POS and need CCP help to flee like little babies.
|
Myz Toyou
Minmatar
APOCALYPSE LEGION
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:45:00 -
[264]
Someone should write a blog on Tentonhammer about this...ohwait. Just keep on whineing...
|
Viktoria Gunndis
Minmatar
Hello Kitty Elitist Ops
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:46:00 -
[265]
Originally by: DantesInfernoRedux
Edited by: DantesInfernoRedux on 28/01/2011 19:34:51
Originally by: 51layer
It was not too many, it was just enough to be effective. Just shut your mouth trying to justify your cheating, you're just mad you lost a region to a bunch of noobs in rifters, how embarassing.
More goon emo. Now I'm cheating.
Still no definitive proof that the bubbling of said pos was not an exploit and ccp has justification at removing them.
And yeah, more of the end of days scenario based on potentially losing one system.
Shakin in me boots.
Damn, you're serious bro? This is worst than telling a religious guy that his "santa" doesn't exist.
You guys got away by an event that wasn't suposed to happen, end of the ****ing deal.
|
Myelinated
Caldari
Autistic Sharks
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:47:00 -
[266]
This makes me want to soak in a nice warm bubble bath with lose bowels and pretend my own excrement is It super capitals
|
Kryhane
Gallente
Peripheral Madness
The Midget Mafia
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:48:00 -
[267]
I read through a bunch of the pages, but it's hard to parse through some of the crap.
so is the tl;dr of this -- Test(and friends?) cage station and supercap staging pos multiple days ago. Somehow this morning after DT all but the oldest bubbles magically revert to unanchored leaving IT to exit stage left at their discretion?
|
Sandwich PvP
Caldari
The Maverick Navy
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:50:00 -
[268]
Originally by: Viribus
Yes, it is not only possible but 100% likely that a spy went to dozens of camped bubbles in a system with hundreds in local and offlined them without anyone noticing. I fail to see any problem with this plan.
Well, is it any less likely than your theory?
And would any intelligent person continue to play this game believing that the Devs themselves were against you?
"fakeedit"
Duh, guess I answered my own question, thread can now be returned to is normal spam.
Sort by what? |
DantesInfernoRedux
Amarr
ANZAC ALLIANCE
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:51:00 -
[269]
Originally by: Karadion
How is it hearsay when I linked to the exact comment who (confirmed or not) had petitioned CCP on excessive bubbles? Do you need a new dictionary? There are even free sites online that can help you clear up the definition of what hearsay is. I did answer your question though. There were 20-40 bubbles per tower / station which is more than enough but way less than what is considered to be an exploit by CCP because it is supposed to be a strain on the server, not on your GeForce2 MX 200 that you got and still haven't replaced.
Yes I'm a stupid goonie! I don't know what I'm talking about.
Guess you've been watching a bit too much Law and Order there. Hearsay is simply unverified information. So still applicable.
Seen ccp justify removing bubbles from gates and pos's due to excess on a non-IT related op/campaign. I'm awaiting ccp's response to the matter. No stamping my feet in a hissy fit like the brunt of you here.
|
Magnus Orin
Minmatar
United Systems Navy
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:52:00 -
[270]
Edited by: Magnus Orin on 28/01/2011 19:54:40
Originally by: DantesInfernoRedux
Excessive bubbling is an exploit in itself.
Can you please provide a citation to this claim?
Also, just who decides how many bubbles constitutes "excessive"
Sarcasm - Because i'm too far away to strangle you. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |