Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Lord Zim
1632
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 20:16:00 -
[181] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:baltec1 wrote:
T3 BC ganking costs more than tempests used to.
Yes but is that value adjusted for the price increase in everything else? If everything has risen in proportion, then ganks are cheaper now. The cost of ganking in a T3 was increased over ganking in a tempest the instant the insurance nerf went through, i.e. before the prices of minerals etc increased.
Try another strawman. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 23:04:00 -
[182] - Quote
No I was unaware and asking a legit question. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1565
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 23:11:00 -
[183] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:baltec1 wrote:T3 BC ganking costs more than tempests used to. Yes but is that value adjusted for the price increase in everything else? If everything has risen in proportion, then ganks are cheaper now. The cost of ganking in a T3 was increased over ganking in a tempest the instant the insurance nerf went through, i.e. before the prices of minerals etc increased. Try another strawman. All these "questions" just another alt trying to act as though there's a great need to nerf ganking.
Look, it's already happening, there's no need to be all excited about it and egg CCP on. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Spurty
V0LTA Verge of Collapse
504
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 23:12:00 -
[184] - Quote
Poasting on page 10 of this years winter expansion wah-wah-waaaaaah dickers getting upset about change thread rage
Go to null
Let me kill you over and over please (no wah-wah-wailing) ---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
359
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 00:45:00 -
[185] - Quote
Spurty wrote:Poasting on page 10 of this years winter expansion wah-wah-waaaaaah dickers getting upset about change thread rage
Go to null
Let me kill you over and over please (no wah-wah-wailing)
No, no, no!
Bad troll! Bad! No soup for you, one month year!
You can't use the same weakfailtroll twice, unless you are an open forum-troll alt. (I'm assuming you think you aren't, at least? Who's your main, then?)
Jesus, what are they teaching kids these days...Panache please, people, panache ! There is a fine and proper artistry to wielding verbal scalpels, such that the crap-poster you've slashed doesn't even know they've been cut. But verbal bludgeons -- Those are just fun. |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2682
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 00:51:00 -
[186] - Quote
Ok, back to the thread title... why are we cooking french people? "A genius throws a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that he's going to die choking in a maze of smoke and flame. A hero drinks a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that if he does a split in midair, he can hit twice as many zombies per kick. Drunk hero wins again, wusses." ~Cracked.com |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
822
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 00:53:00 -
[187] - Quote
Spurty wrote:Go to null
Let me kill you over and over please (no wah-wah-wailing) If you want to kill me over and over you should be able to come to highsec and do it there. I shouldn't have to go no null for you to kill me over and over and that is our entire complaint. |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 01:10:00 -
[188] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:from http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.ca/2012/10/how-to-boil-frog.htmlAnd then thesummer of 2011 came, the **** hit the fan, the players were unhappy, subscriptions were cancelled. CCP was faced with the realization that what they did might not be appreciated. The goose might not lay golden eggs in perpetuity. CCP discovered fear.
I'm a bit new here. I've seen people here refer to some sort of apocalyptic event that happened in 2011. What exactly happened here? I joined after Incursion released so don't really know what this reference is to... can someone please explain?
|

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
822
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 01:16:00 -
[189] - Quote
It was the expansion that must not be named. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1566
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 01:17:00 -
[190] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:It was the expansion that must not be named. The INCARNAtion of doom itself. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5077
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 01:35:00 -
[191] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote: Historically, the most whining, the most threats of ending subscriptions, have come from the carebear segment of the playerbase.
Malarky most whines on EVENEWS24, THEMITTANI.COM, & EVE forum posts/blogs are NULL seccerz bleating about how to move HI SECerz into NULL so they have more EZ prey. Your post is yet another whine that everybody's sandbox shouldbe the way you want it.
since you're against a risky hisec, i guess you're for removing incursions and other high-reward activities from hisec
oh wait, no you're not lmao This post was crafted by a member of the Goonswarm Federation posting cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online posting.
fofofofofo |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1566
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 02:05:00 -
[192] - Quote
Andski wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Historically, the most whining, the most threats of ending subscriptions, have come from the carebear segment of the playerbase. Malarky most whines on EVENEWS24, THEMITTANI.COM, & EVE forum posts/blogs are NULL seccerz bleating about how to move HI SECerz into NULL so they have more EZ prey. Your post is yet another whine that everybody's sandbox shouldbe the way you want it. since you're against a risky hisec, i guess you're for removing incursions and other high-reward activities from hisec oh wait, no you're not lmao Rewards aren't risky, why do they have to be removed along with risk. They're the antithesis of risk.
Low-risk high-reward in highsec ERYYDAYYYYY Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 03:08:00 -
[193] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: All these "questions" just another alt trying to act as though there's a great need to nerf ganking.
Look, it's already happening, there's no need to be all excited about it and egg CCP on.
Actually this is my main and only. War dec me if you want for committing the sin of posting on main.
As for ganking I make most of my money stealing from the wrecks outside Jita. Nerfing ganking is bad for me |

Pipa Porto
1184
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 04:59:00 -
[194] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:from http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.ca/2012/10/how-to-boil-frog.htmlAnd then thesummer of 2011 came, the **** hit the fan, the players were unhappy, subscriptions were cancelled. CCP was faced with the realization that what they did might not be appreciated. The goose might not lay golden eggs in perpetuity. CCP discovered fear. I'm a bit new here. I've seen people here refer to some sort of apocalyptic event that happened in 2011. What exactly happened here? I joined after Incursion released so don't really know what this reference is to... can someone please explain?
Incarna was released with it's microtransaction store ($70 Monocles, and nothing under ~$10 IIRC) and anemic CQ, with little FIS content. A horrendously damaging internal newsletter was released (it could easily be read as "Microtransaction Everything"). There was a revelation about that anemic CQ being responsible for the relatively anemic expansions of the previous months. There was an emergency CSM summit (with a bungled and delayed release of minutes).
All of that resulted in giant protests and cost CCP ~25k Subs. That was CCP's summer 2011. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
2770
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 10:24:00 -
[195] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote: Every player meet, every fanfest, CCP Soundwave trots out the same tired vision, how one day he would like to turn off CONCORD and leave policing in the players hands.
Poetic Stanziel wrote: Increasing the costs of wardecs. Buffing mining ships to an obscene, nearly ungankable level. Removing insurance if killed by CONCORD. The so-called idiot switch to protect players from their own stupidity. The removal of can-flipping. Buffing CONCORD response. A change here, a change there. Control the message of those changes ("this behaviour was never intended," even when those behaviours have existed for years and never classified as exploits.)
Poetic Stanziel wrote: Toss a frog into some boiling water, it's going to freak the hell out and immediately try to escape. But, put a frog in some cool water, very slowly increase the temperature of the water over time and the frog will not perceive the danger, eventually boiling to death. Or so the hypothesis goes. Turns out it is complete bunk, the frog will hop out of the water when it becomes uncomfortably warm. As a metaphor, though, the boiling frog anecdote is instructive.
Interesting post in general - while I might disagree about some of the specifics of focus I do see where you are going with it. For my part I guess this frog jumped out of the water over the inferno 1.1 wardec changes. That was the point where I personally believed that Soundwave (aided and abetted by the CSM) had jumped the shark on sandbox balance and introduced an easy mode for the largest and richest alliances in the game by protecting them from affordable wardecs offensive and defensive ally consequence. It was a clumsy knee-jerk that broke more than it fixed and left a nearly unusable wardec system that most players appear to already have opted out of. (Speaking as a player who's considered the wardec system a core focus of my Eve gameplay since 2003 you can understand perhaps why losing that functionality initially stings then mutates into a disappointed sigh and feeling of "meh")
Ultimately I guess we all have our personal view of when changes go too far and ruin our view of what the sandbox should be and when that time comes we get to vote with our feet (and credit cards).
I'm still (and probably always will be) quite interested in Eve Online and where it ends up going - but for the immediate future I don't have much faith in Soundwave's vision or direction and I'm opting to take one of those plex-fueled can't be bothered to play breaks while there are so many other games and RL stuff to concentrate on.
Perhaps things would be different if I had any faith in the CSM actually understanding the problems mind ... but such faith is long fled. Its a shame but things change and Eve is a very old game now. At this point I think it needs a general reinvention and mass injection of time and lavish focus coupled with renewed direction from a chief designer who actually "gets" how the varied ecosystem of the single server sandbox should interact and counter-balance itself to keep the game rich, vibrant and genuinely varied in population and opportunity.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedomInferno Wardecs - Shoot Goons for FREE $300,000 dollars :(-á |

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1794
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 10:57:00 -
[196] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Nyancat Audeles wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:from http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.ca/2012/10/how-to-boil-frog.htmlAnd then thesummer of 2011 came, the **** hit the fan, the players were unhappy, subscriptions were cancelled. CCP was faced with the realization that what they did might not be appreciated. The goose might not lay golden eggs in perpetuity. CCP discovered fear. I'm a bit new here. I've seen people here refer to some sort of apocalyptic event that happened in 2011. What exactly happened here? I joined after Incursion released so don't really know what this reference is to... can someone please explain? Incarna was released with it's microtransaction store ($70 Monocles, and nothing under ~$10 IIRC) and anemic CQ, with little FIS content. A horrendously damaging internal newsletter was released (it could easily be read as "Microtransaction Everything"). There was a revelation about that anemic CQ being responsible for the relatively anemic expansions of the previous months. There was an emergency CSM summit (with a bungled and delayed release of minutes). All of that resulted in giant protests and cost CCP ~25k Subs. That was CCP's summer 2011. You forgot a big part. They removed ship spinning !
Can't tell me that didn't contribute to the disaster ! Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1521
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 13:33:00 -
[197] - Quote
Two step wrote:You seem to be forgetting all the stuff CCP did that helped suicide gankers, like Tier 3 BCs, the destroyer buffs, etc. Which they totally undid and then some with the latest changes.
It seems that CCP likes to talk the talk about EVE being a cold harsh 'anything goes' universe, but in plain sight of everyone they are slowly changing that fact. TK is recruiting |

Markku Laaksonen
EVE University Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 13:38:00 -
[198] - Quote
Genuinely thought I would be learning how to cook up some tasty frog legs. Halfway through the OP I said to myself, I said "Self, that's no recipe! You've been bamboozled!"
p.s. "Bamboozled" passes the red squiggly line spell check. |

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1345
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 19:07:00 -
[199] - Quote
I don't see how the new Kill Rights system does anything but discourage PvP in highsec. As Rotosequence describes the new system, it is engage highsec gangbang functionality.
Previous system, the kill rights were one-to-one. I admit that I like the idea of being able to sell a kill right, but the system should still remain one-to-one.
Not the case though. As soon as a kill right is activated, the target receives a suspect flag, opening them to aggression from EVERYONE.
Some people will continue to give no shits if they can be free-for-alled, but this will definitely cause many people to think twice before grabbing a criminal flag in highsec, because it means they can be dogpiled at anytime in highsec and without warning.
More evidence of CCP's ongoing development criteria of safening up highsec space. Caldari Militia |

Tenebrae Syrennis
The Scope Gallente Federation
24
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 01:25:00 -
[200] - Quote
Ohaidere, Soundwave!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNm5Hqow78I&feature=related
You monumental hypocrite. I have come to eat all your brains. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1801
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 01:35:00 -
[201] - Quote
Andski wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote: Historically, the most whining, the most threats of ending subscriptions, have come from the carebear segment of the playerbase.
Malarky most whines on EVENEWS24, THEMITTANI.COM, & EVE forum posts/blogs are NULL seccerz bleating about how to move HI SECerz into NULL so they have more EZ prey. Your post is yet another whine that everybody's sandbox shouldbe the way you want it. since you're against a risky hisec, i guess you're for removing incursions and other high-reward activities from hisec oh wait, no you're not lmao
When tech moons can be depleted perhaps those incursions should leave high sec.
Or maybe remove local in 0.0.
Just saying... |

Lord Zim
1643
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 01:56:00 -
[202] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:When tech moons can be depleted perhaps those incursions should leave high sec. Have you scanned a region before? A constellation? A single system?
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Or maybe remove local in 0.0. What's that you say, you wanted incursions, L4s and L3s to be removed from hisec?
Okay then. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
647
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 03:13:00 -
[203] - Quote
OK, so we've got theoretical FFA in hisec --just ask CCP, they'll tell you-- although I suspect the actual result will be much different.
So, let's take this to its logical endpoint:
CCP, allow covert cyno generation and bridging-to/between in hisec, with the legal possibility to escape CONCORD through same. Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1802
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 06:32:00 -
[204] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:OK, so we've got theoretical FFA in hisec --just ask CCP, they'll tell you-- although I suspect the actual result will be much different.
So, let's take this to its logical endpoint:
CCP, allow covert cyno generation and bridging-to/between in hisec, with the legal possibility to escape CONCORD through same.
That with the present proposed crimewatch and bounty system would really stir things up. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1802
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 06:34:00 -
[205] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:When tech moons can be depleted perhaps those incursions should leave high sec. Have you scanned a region before? A constellation? A single system? Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Or maybe remove local in 0.0. What's that you say, you wanted incursions, L4s and L3s to be removed from hisec? Okay then.
I spends months at a time in 0.0, trespassing, and go weeks at a time without seeing anybody else. I can say I scanned quite a few systems since exploration is pretty much the bulk of what I have done since they revamped it. |

Lord Zim
1643
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 07:19:00 -
[206] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:When tech moons can be depleted perhaps those incursions should leave high sec. Have you scanned a region before? A constellation? A single system? Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Or maybe remove local in 0.0. What's that you say, you wanted incursions, L4s and L3s to be removed from hisec? Okay then. I spends months at a time in 0.0, trespassing, and go weeks at a time without seeing anybody else. I can say I scanned quite a few systems since exploration is pretty much the bulk of what I have done since they revamped it. I'll take that as a no, then. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Pipa Porto
1190
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 07:52:00 -
[207] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:When tech moons can be depleted perhaps those incursions should leave high sec. Have you scanned a region before? A constellation? A single system? Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Or maybe remove local in 0.0. What's that you say, you wanted incursions, L4s and L3s to be removed from hisec? Okay then. I spends months at a time in 0.0, trespassing, and go weeks at a time without seeing anybody else. I can say I scanned quite a few systems since exploration is pretty much the bulk of what I have done since they revamped it.
Wrong type of scanning, jenious.
If you're talking about depleteable moon minerals, you're talking about increasing the amount of moon scanning necessary. How many systems have you scanned down completely? I've done about a dozen systems (never more than 1 or two at a time, by the way) and each time it make me want to [bad taste filter preempting comment of great violence]. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
159
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 07:53:00 -
[208] - Quote
this frog still living? |

Xhendiorandielum
Griffon's Revenge
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 13:31:00 -
[209] - Quote
1. Remove people showing up in local. 2. Make minerals in HiSec completely finite. 3. Move level 4 sec. missions to low sec. 4. Replace CONCORD NPC police force with CONCORD agent missions (patrol, destroy player etc) with above level 3s taking you into low sec. 5. ??? 6. Profit! (+£ber bonus mode. Remove jumpgates, add dedicated jumpships capable of jumping fleets.) |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 13:34:00 -
[210] - Quote
What is wrong with making hisec safer? |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |